Mayor & City Council
Regular MeetingCollege Park, MD · August 11, 2015
Minutes
MINUTES
Regular Meeting of the College Park City Council
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
Council Chambers
8:40 p.m. – 10:35 p.m.
PRESENT: Mayor Fellows; Councilmembers Kabir, Wojahn, Brennan, Dennis,
Stullich, Day, Hew and Mitchell.
ABSENT: None.
ALSO PRESENT: Joe Nagro, City Manager; Janeen Miller, City Clerk; Bill Gardiner,
Assistant City Manager; Suellen Ferguson, City Attorney; Terry Schum,
Director of Planning; Miriam Bader, Senior Planner; Steve Groh, Director
of Finance; Cole Holocker, Student Liaison.
Mayor Fellows opened the Regular Meeting at 8:40 p.m. after the conclusion of a 7:00 p.m. Oral
Argument. Councilmember Mitchell led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Minutes: A motion was made by Councilmember Dennis and seconded by Councilmember
Brennan to approve the minutes of the Public Hearing on the Strategic Plan held on July 7, 2015,
the Special Session of July 7, 2015, and the Regular Meeting on July 14, 2015. The motion
passed 8 – 0 – 0.
Announcements: None.
Amendments to the Agenda: None.
City Manager’s Report: Mr. Nagro announced that this is the Council’s last meeting of
August; the next Worksession is September 1. He has received a request from Taylor Roethle,
Vice President of External Affairs, IFC, for a $10,000 donation from the City for the on-campus
tailgates prior to football games. Last year we gave $5,000. He looked at their budget; they
have grants from Pepsi, Parents Grant, and Student Affairs. He recommended we match the
Student Affairs grant for $7,000. Council agreed to the contribution of $7,000.
Mr. Gardiner updated Council on the pedestrian overpass at the end of Berwyn Road: There was
a conference call last Friday. The one span over the Metro tracks has been ordered. Two
outstanding issues remain: whether to replace both spans (the other is the span over the CSX
tracks) and whether the current design is ADA compatible.
Student Liaison’s Report: The SGA hosted the Association of Big Ten Students. The
Association took a position on legislation establishing a task force to prevent sexual assault on
campus, in conjunction with the Big Ten. School begins Monday, August 31, followed by a
three-day weekend for Labor Day. He discussed move-ins and the football schedule.
Council requested to hear about plans for management of the Labor Day weekend activities at
the September 1 Worksession.
College Park City Council Meeting Minutes
August 11, 2015
Page 2
Comments From The Audience on Non-Agenda Items:
Carol Nezzo, 4600 Amherst Road: She discussed the benefits of participating in the
University’s volunteer program, and specifically discussed a new initiative to support the Office
of Foreign Students and the Volunteer Service Corps where they are seeking volunteers to help
with foreign student orientation. She provided her contact information and said she would send
an announcement directly to the Council.
CONSENT AGENDA: A motion was made by Councilmember Dennis and seconded by
Councilmember Wojahn to adopt the Consent Agenda, which consists of the following
items:
15-R-12 Resolution Of The Mayor And Council Of The City Of College Park,
Maryland Adopting The Recommendations Of The Advisory Planning
Commission Regarding Variance Application Number CPV-2015-03, 9735
Narragansett Parkway, College Park, Maryland, Recommending Approval
Of A Variance From Section 27-120.01(C) Of The Prince George’s County
Zoning Ordinance, “Front Yards Of Dwellings,” To Construct A Driveway
In The Front Yard, 15.5 Feet In Width By 32.5 Feet In Length.
15-G-84 Award of a one-year contract extension (Option Year 3 in Contract
CP-13-01) to NZI Construction Corporation of Beltsville, MD for FY ’16
“Miscellaneous Concrete Maintenance and Asphalt Resurfacing” in an
amount not to exceed $721,000, funded from Fund 301 Unrestricted C.I.P.
Reserve.
15-R-13 Resolution Of The Mayor And Council Of The City Of College Park,
Maryland Establishing A Framework For Evaluating Requests For
Recognitions And Commemorations.
15-G-85 Approval of an Amendment to Contract CP-13-01 with NZI Construction
Corporation of Beltsville, MD for Miscellaneous Downtown Streetscape
Improvements in an amount not to exceed $175,000 to be funded from C.I.P.
#103001, Downtown Streetscape #2, federal EDI Special Project Grant
Program B-08-SP-MD-0517, subject to a determination of proper form and
legal sufficiency by the City Attorney.
The motion passed 8 – 0 – 0.
ACTION ITEMS:
15-G-87 Adoption of the 2015-2020 Strategic Plan and Action Plan
A motion was made by Councilmember Dennis and seconded by Councilmember Brennan
that the City Council adopt the 2015–2020 Strategic Plan and Action Plan, which
establishes a new City Vision, Mission, Values, and Goals for the next five years. The
College Park City Council Meeting Minutes
August 11, 2015
Page 3
Action Plan identifies the specific steps City staff will take in order to accomplish the
Strategic Plan goals.
Councilmember Dennis said that in late 2014 the City Council initiated the development of a
new Strategic Plan with the assistance of The Novak Consulting Group. The process included an
environmental scan, focus group meetings, an online survey, public hearings, and all-day
workshops with Council and with staff. The Strategic Plan that Council is presenting tonight for
adoption articulates a new community vision for College Park, and establishes new goals and
steps to achieve our vision. The 2020 Strategic Plan Goals are: One College Park,
Environmental Sustainability, High Quality Development and Reinvestment, Quality
Infrastructure, Effective Leadership, Excellent Services. With input from Council, City staff
have developed and refined an Action Plan that identifies the steps that City departments will
carry out to accomplish the goals. The Action Plan will be updated regularly, and Council may
add or change items. Council and staff will work to ensure that residents, businesses, and our
partners in the region understand and embrace the City’s vision and goals.
There were no comments from the audience.
Councilmember Brennan said the “One College Park” goal is the most unique as it addresses
issues relating to geographic boundaries, bringing together our diverse population, our growing
relationship with the University and our desire for better communication utilizing different
methods.
Councilmember Kabir said the tough part is in front of us: to make the plan work. The plan is as
good as it can be on paper but to make it a reality we need to work hard.
Councilmember Wojahn said one of the most important goals is to expand the ways that we
engage with residents and to do a better job of reaching out to those residents who do not usually
have a voice. He looks forward to hiring a communications person, who he sees as doing not
just communication but also engagement.
Councilmember Mitchell said each Councilmember needs to take this plan to their civic
associations so the residents can be part of the process.
Mayor Fellows said we implemented many goals from the last five-year strategic plan and he is
excited about the many new initiatives in the new Plan.
The motion passed 8 – 0 – 0.
15-G-86 Approval of the scope of services for a feasibility study for Hollywood Road
extended at Mazza GrandMarc Apartments
A motion was made by Councilmember Mitchell and seconded by Councilmember Day
that the Mayor and Council give Starr Insurance Holdings the $500,000 in escrow back to
them.
College Park City Council Meeting Minutes
August 11, 2015
Page 4
Comments from the audience:
Sam Shin, Son of owner of 9600 Baltimore Avenue: To his untrained eye, there is no way this
project would not negatively impact his father’s property. If that is an acceptable casualty, then
there is nothing he can say to sway them. If it does bother them, he urges them to give the
money back and halt this process.
Suzanne Johnson, 9610 Autoville Drive: Council keeps continuing this discussion and it is
driving them crazy. It should have been resolved – Ms. Yep doesn’t want to do the feasibility
study, the neighbors don’t want it, they submitted petitions, they brought in a whole room of
people to testify, and yet the Council keeps pushing to have it done. Doing eminent domain
would reflect poorly on the City. Putting the light at Hollywood Road was a mistake – it should
have been put in front of the Mazza property in the first place. If this keeps going they will have
to get up another petition.
Mary Cook, 4705 Kiernan Road: One year ago this room was full of people who were
opposed to the feasibility study yet the Council voted in favor of it. They were so disappointed
and hurt that they wouldn’t come out tonight; they don’t believe in this process. If you do the
feasibility study - then what? There will be 20 more steps before a road can be built, which will
cost the taxpayers about $1.3 million, which we don’t have.
Councilmember Mitchell asked Ms. Yep if a one-way alignment is feasible. Ms. Yep said their
driveway has the main water line, so they would have to keep the current driveway or move the
water line and then develop the one way road, so they would be “dinged.” They would use the
current driveway for going into the property then would have to build the one-way road. It
would be very expensive: the various studies would cost about $800,000, then to take the land
would be about $1M, and that doesn’t include construction costs. The feasibility study will
provide construction costs.
Councilmember Mitchell asked how much each community meeting costs. Ms. Yep said each
community meeting with her consultant would cost about $1,000. Ms. Yep said they will pay up
to $500,000, but questions whether the City would be able to fund the construction of the road.
Mr. Holocker said he was speaking for residents of Mazza out of concern for the safety of people
making left turns into the shared center lane. This access is incompatible with future Route 1
reconstruction. He wouldn’t want to take any property but when the project was developed the
owner agreed to allocate $500,000 to study this roadway. It doesn’t mean we have to build it, or
that circumstances of those businesses wouldn’t change in the future. By undertaking this study
with money obligated by Mazza we would know what the options are.
Councilmember Brennan echoed the safety concerns mentioned by Mr. Holocker and said they
are attempting to represent a significant population of people who haven’t shown up for these
meetings who are making dangerous choices. There are unknown items that might come out of
this feasibility study and he would benefit from having this information. Doing the feasibility
study does not necessarily mean building the road. He is empathetic to the community but the
assumptions that he is hearing are creating false dilemmas and fear.
College Park City Council Meeting Minutes
August 11, 2015
Page 5
A amended motion was made by Councilmember Brennan and seconded by
Councilmember Wojahn that the scope of services submitted by VIKA Maryland, LLC for
a feasibility study to extend Hollywood Road west of US Route 1 to the Mazza GrandMarc
Apartments be approved subject to the following modifications:
1. Item # 2 under Project Assumptions shall be revised to state that the alternative
alignments should be designed to minimize the impact to adjoining properties to the
extent possible and that consideration shall be given to a one-way alignment alternative
if practicable.
2. Item #11 under Project Assumptions shall be revised to clarify that there will be a
minimum of two meetings with community stakeholders; one meeting to review the
alternative alignments to be studied and one meeting to present the final results of the
study.
3. Item # 3 Hollywood Road Site Layout and Grading Plan under Scope of Services shall
be revised to include community stakeholders in the discussions with the client and city
staff in determining the three alternative alignments to be studied.
4. Item # 9 Project Meetings under Scope of Services shall be revised to add adjoining
property owners, community stakeholders and city staff to those already listed.
Councilmember Brennan commented that $500,000 is held in escrow by Starr Insurance
Holding, Inc. for the planning, design and construction of the extension of Hollywood Road west
of Route 1 as required under an Agreement with the City. The feasibility study is estimated to
cost $66,500. The study will be conducted by VIKA engineers under the supervision of Starr
and in conjunction with city staff, adjoining property owners and community stakeholders. The
results will be presented to the City Council at which time the next steps will be considered.
Comments from the audience on the Amendment:
Unidentified Business Owner in Mr. Shin’s property: No matter what feasibility study you
do, you will still have a road cutting through a property. Just give the money back.
Keri Sargent, 9610 Autoville Drive, business owner in Mr. Shin’s property: Are you saying
that the safety of the Mazza residents getting out of their property is more important than the
livelihood of the business owners? All of you know there is no other way besides taking part of
the businesses. We have worried about this for months wondering when this is going to happen
and how our lives are going to be affected; put yourselves in our shoes.
Diane Yep, 399 Park Avenue, NYC, NY: She clarified the ownership: PPC/CHP Maryland;
Starr Insurance Holdings is an investor. If safety is the issue, make it right turn only when you
leave the property. They have completed 25 of the 26 conditions. One was to complete the
Hollywood Road light. Mayor Fellows asked if this could be done as part of the feasibility
study. Ms. Yep said yes, it could. Councilmember Brennan said there is a restricted sign there,
but Ms. Yep said people still turn left.
Ms. Schum said a condition of approval of the Mazza GrandMarc project regarded access. It is
no left turn from the property – it is right out only and left in. You can’t restrict access to right-
out only without building another access – you have to allow left turns in. That condition would
have to be modified with the Planning Board. Ms. Schum said the feasibility study could address
this issue.
College Park City Council Meeting Minutes
August 11, 2015
Page 6
Sam Shin: This process itself is detrimental to the businesses; having this hanging over them
devalues the properties.
Comments from the Council on the amendment:
Councilmember Day said running businesses out of College Park is not what we should be
doing. The uncertainty of being able to support your family puts a strain on every day. There is
an opportunity to correct the entrance to Mazza, yet we are still trying to push forward even
though the residents, businesses and the person financing it do not want to move forward. Who
do we really want to support in our City? We should have the police ticket people at Mazza. If
we keep running businesses out, no other businesses are going to want to come in. This is a bad
idea.
Councilmember Mitchell said we just passed a strategic plan about engaging our residents and
businesses, and yet we come to this motion and we cannot accept that these long-term residents
and small businesses say they do not want this. A study triggers money and would trigger the
ongoing process of completing a road that would take away homes. She does not see how we
can go forward with this.
Councilmember Wojahn said we have to decide how to balance the safety and lives of our
residents who are put at risk by a dangerous traffic situation with the protection and viability of
some of our important small businesses. He does not think we should make that determination
without having the full range of information before us, so he supports moving forward with this
feasibility study.
Mr. Holocker said he doesn’t think one business is more valuable than another, nor that we can
judge the life of a person more than the value of a business. He would not support building a
road with the current conditions that exist. But, sites can change over time. We can decide to not
move forward after the feasibility study is done, but it would be good to have the information,
especially when there is money that has been obligated for this purpose.
Councilmember Hew said no one is talking about taking homes. No one wants eminent domain.
This is just a study being done in a commercial district, not in a residential community. It is our
obligation to consider how to improve Route 1 and this is part of that effort and was decided
years ago. He is looking for valuable information that was promised by a previous Council. We
want to find a way to have the least impact on businesses. What we do with that information is a
decision for another day.
Councilmember Kabir said he asked the consultant last week if there would be an impact on the
businesses, and he said yes. The study will determine how large the impact will be. It sounds
good to spend the money since it is someone else’s money – not the taxpayers. So then what?
We will use eminent domain to take out that property, like we tried with #1 Liquors. What
message are we sending to our business community? He hopes we can find some common
ground to make safety improvements without impacting the businesses.
Councilmember Brennan said making these slippery slope arguments is dangerous. He asked if
studying another roadway into or out of Mazza could be part of the scope of work for this
feasibility study.
College Park City Council Meeting Minutes
August 11, 2015
Page 7
Ms. Schum said she believed that would be outside of this scope of work; the intention of the
money was to study Hollywood Road extended. Access into and out of Mazza is on the Detailed
Site Plan for the property and any modifications would be an amendment to the approved DSP
and would have to go back to the Planning Board, which is outside of this scope.
Mayor Fellows said one potential outcome of the feasibility study might suggest a process where
you would do something else to improve public safety.
Councilmember Day one possible outcome would lead to developing a road that would cost
millions of dollars to the taxpayers. There may not be residences there, but if someone cuts off
your paycheck and you can’t pay your bills, that is taking your house. Instead maybe we should
be working with SHA to redesign that intersection.
Vote on the amendment:
Aye: Wojahn, Brennan, Stullich, Hew
Nay: Kabir, Dennis, Day, Mitchell
Mayor Fellows voted Yes to break the tie and the amendment carried.
Vote on the main motion as amended:
Aye: Wojahn, Brennan, Stullich, Hew
Nay: Kabir, Dennis, Day, Mitchell
Mayor Fellows voted Yes to break the tie and the amended motion carried.
15-G-88 Approval of Amendment Three To Agreement Of Lease By And Between
City Of College Park And Ledo Restaurant, Inc.
A motion was made by Councilmember Day and seconded by Councilmember Dennis to
approve a Third Amendment to the Agreement of Lease between the City Of College Park
and Ledo Restaurant, Inc., to authorize current lease payments based on $15.00 per square
foot from October 1, 2013 through August, 2017. The rent will increase 2% on September
1, 2017 and for each of the two following years (2018 and 2019), without waiving the right
to collect rent based on the original lease terms. Prior to September 1, 2020, staff will meet
with Ledo’s to work out an arrangement for future rent calculations and to resolve any
non-payment issues. Loan payments will continue on the prior amortization schedule. The
City will not pursue at this time any prior unpaid or reduced amounts but does not waive
any rights with respect to these amounts. The lease amendment will be drafted by the City
Attorney consistent with this motion, and the City Manager is authorized to sign the lease
amendment.
Councilmember Day said the City supports local businesses, and as part of that effort has leased
the commercial space in the City parking garage to Ledo Restaurant, Inc. The owners of Ledo’s
have requested the ability to pay a per square foot rent that is less than that required by the lease
for a specified period of time. The Council has determined that it is appropriate to allow for this
College Park City Council Meeting Minutes
August 11, 2015
Page 8
limited time arrangement. Ledo’s will continue to repay the loan to the City in the originally
scheduled basis.
There were no comments from the audience.
Councilmember Kabir said he likes the idea of supporting our local businesses and Ledo is a
signature restaurant, but he has concerns about lowering the rent to $15/square foot from $25,
when other businesses pay a higher rate. We are afraid that we might lose this business if we
don’t lower the rent and it would be difficult to find a replacement business, but there are other
new businesses moving into Route 1 and there will be more customers because new housing is
being built. He will abstain.
The motion passed 6 – 0 – 1 (Hew absent; Kabir abstained).
15-O-04 Introduction Of Ordinance 15-O-04, An Ordinance Of The Mayor And
Council Of The City Of College Park, Amending Chapter 175 “Taxation”,
Article IV, “Revitalization Tax Credit”, Sections §175-9 “Eligibility
Requirements”; §175-10 “Eligibility Criteria”; §175-11 “Tax Credit –
Amount And Term”; §175-12 “Application Process”; And §175-13
“Waiver”, To Change Eligibility Requirements And Criteria, To Clarify
That A Tax Credit Will Be Granted Only If Financially Feasible, To Clarify
The Application Process, And To Delete A Certain Waiver Option.
A motion was made by Councilmember Wojahn and seconded by Councilmember Kabir to
introduce Ordinance 15-O-04, An Ordinance Of The Mayor And Council Of The City Of
College Park, Amending Chapter 175 “Taxation”, Article IV, “Revitalization Tax Credit”,
Sections §175-9 “Eligibility Requirements”; §175-10 “Eligibility Criteria”; §175-11 “Tax
Credit – Amount And Term”; §175-12 “Application Process”; And §175-13 “Waiver”, To
Change Eligibility Requirements And Criteria, To Clarify That A Tax Credit Will Be
Granted Only If Financially Feasible, To Clarify The Application Process, And To Delete A
Certain Waiver Option.
Mayor Fellows announced that the Public Hearing on this Ordinance is scheduled for 7:15 p.m.
on Tuesday, September 8, 2015 in the Council Chambers
15-G-89 Approval of the City Manager’s Employment Agreement
The City Attorney briefed the Council on the status of the contract negotiations. There are three
substantive issues that are outstanding:
1) Council had already approved the contribution to deferred compensation, but the candidate is
requesting that the contribution be spread out over the year rather than as a one-time
contribution. She suggested that is a good idea – it doesn’t change the amount.
2) The candidate is desirous of having a 30-day time for termination of employment. Right now
the agreement says 90 days. Council might want to agree to a compromise of 60 days.
3) Reimbursement of moving expenses: there was a request that the candidate’s partner be
included in visits to locate new housing. This was included in option B.
College Park City Council Meeting Minutes
August 11, 2015
Page 9
Mayor Fellows said 60 days seemed like a reasonable request.
A motion was made by Councilmember Brennan and seconded by Councilmember Stullich
to approve a contract in substantially the form attached, with the changes that were just
suggested tonight.
Councilmember Brennan thanked the stakeholder groups and everyone who has been affected by
this process, and the Council for their thoughtful deliberation. It was a good process, they saw a
lot of very qualified people, and we look forward to working with this candidate and see a very
bright future.
Councilmember Stullich agreed that it was a good process with helpful participation from the
stakeholder group and City staff and thoughtful discussion among the Council. We should be
pleased that we have an outstanding City Manager who is preparing to join us.
The motion passed 8 – 0 – 0.
Mayor Fellows announced that his name is Scott Somers, and that his starting date is still to be
determined.
15-G-91 Discussion and possible approval of a Council position on certain design
issues on SHA’s proposed U.S. Route 1 reconstruction
Mr. Gardiner provided an overview: Last week the State Highway Administration (SHA) came
to Council and presented the overview of the current design for reconstruction of US 1 from
College Avenue to 193. The City and University have been meeting with SHA to go over the
parcel-by-parcel detail of the plan, and we have expressed our concerns in these meetings about
the pedestrian and bike facilities provided in the plan. It would be helpful to staff to have a
formal position by Council expressing concerns about pedestrian buffers and bicycle lanes as we
move forward in these meetings. Last week’s SHA presentation was very general and did not
provide an opportunity for us to convey these concerns.
A motion was made by Councilmember Wojahn and seconded by Councilmember Kabir
for the City to express its concerns with the current SHA plans, as presented on August 5,
2015, for pedestrian and bicycle facilities for the reconstruction of Baltimore Avenue. This
motion authorizes City staff to work with the County, the University of Maryland, elected
officials, the business and property owners along Baltimore Avenue, and SHA officials, to
create an appropriate buffered pedestrian zone with adequate sidewalks, improved access
management onto Baltimore Avenue, the appropriate location of utilities, and an improved
buffer for bicyclists.
Councilmember Wojahn said the City, County, and University have been meeting and will
continue to meet with SHA on these design issues. This motion is to convey the Council’s
concerns and support for the positions identified above. Council may wish to review the plans in
greater detail and provide additional comments in the fall after the parties have met with SHA.
College Park City Council Meeting Minutes
August 11, 2015
Page 10
He added that this project provides an opportunity for SHA to do something right that will
benefit the City for many years to come.
The motion passed 8 – 0 – 0.
15-G-90 Appointments to Boards and Committees
A motion was made by Councilmember Wojahn and seconded by Councilmember Kabir to
appoint Kate Kennedy to the Advisory Planning Commission, Eric Hoffman and Christine
O’Brien to the Tree and Landscape Board, Pat Noone to the Animal Welfare Committee, Bob
Schnabel to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Committee, and Dave Dorsch to the Airport
Authority. The motion passed 8 – 0 – 0.
COUNCIL COMMENTS:
Councilmember Wojahn discussed his accident on July 18 where he was hit by a car on Route
193. He has been touched and humbled by the people who have come to his assistance. He
thanked public safety officials, his husband, and members of the community. It is a difficult
thing to have to go through, but it has taught him a lot.
ADJOURN: A motion was made by Councilmember Stullich and seconded by Councilmember
Dennis to adjourn the Regular Meeting. With a vote of 8 – 0 – 0, Mayor Fellows adjourned the
meeting at 10:35 p.m.
____________________________________________
Janeen S. Miller, CMC Date
City Clerk Approved
Pursuant to §C6-3 of the College Park City Charter, at 7:00 p.m. on August 5, 2015, a motion
was made by Councilmember Brennan and seconded by Councilmember Dennis to enter into a
Closed Session to consult with Counsel on a legal matter. The motion passed 5 – 0 – 0 and the
Council entered into the closed session at 7:00 p.m.
Present: Mayor Andrew Fellows; Councilmembers Wojahn, Brennan, Dennis, Day and Hew.
Councilmember Kabir arrived at 7:02 p.m. and Councilmember Mitchell arrived at 7:08 p.m.
Absent: Councilmember Stullich.
Also Present: Joe Nagro, City Manager; Suellen Ferguson, City Attorney; Bill Gardiner,
Assistant City Manager; Janeen Miller, City Clerk; Steve Groh, Director of Finance; Cole
Holocker, Student Liaison; Adler Pruitt, Deputy Student Liaison.
College Park City Council Meeting Minutes
August 11, 2015
Page 11
Topics Discussed: The City Attorney advised the City Council about possible amendments to
an existing lease agreement.
Actions Taken: None.
Adjourn: A motion was made by Councilmember Dennis and seconded by Councilmember
Wojahn to adjourn the closed session, and at 7:21 p.m. with a vote of 7 – 0 – 0, Mayor Fellows
adjourned the meeting.
Pursuant To §3-103 of the General Provisions Article of the Maryland Annotated Code, the
Mayor and City Council met in Administrative Function session on Tuesday, July 21, 2015 to
conduct an interview with a City Manager candidate. From 7:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. they met at
Ledo’s Restaurant and from 8:10 – 9:45 p.m. the session continued in the Council Chambers of
City Hall. Mayor Fellows, Councilmembers Dennis, Brennan, Kabir, Stullich, Hew, Mitchell
and Day were present. Councilmember Wojahn participated in part of the session by telephone.
Pursuant To §3-103 of the General Provisions Article of the Maryland Annotated Code, the
Mayor and City Council met in Administrative Function session on Wednesday, July 22, 2015 to
conduct an interview with a City Manager candidate. From 7:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. they met at
Ledo’s Restaurant and from 8:00 – 9:40 p.m. the session continued in the Council Chambers of
City Hall. Mayor Fellows and all members of the City Council were present.
Pursuant To §3-103 of the General Provisions Article of the Maryland Annotated Code, the
Mayor and City Council met in Administrative Function session from 7:00 p.m. – 8:40 p.m. on
Tuesday, July 28, 2015 in the Council Chambers of City Hall. Mayor Fellows, Councilmembers
Mitchell, Hew, Wojahn, Kabir, Day, Stullich, and Dennis were present. Councilmember
Brennan participated by telephone. The City Council discussed the City Manager search.
Pursuant To §3-103 of the General Provisions Article of the Maryland Annotated Code, the
Mayor and members of the City Council met in Administrative Function session from 7:00 p.m.
– 10:25 p.m. on Thursday, July 30, 2015 in the Council Chambers of City Hall. Present were
Mayor Fellows and Councilmembers Dennis, Stullich, and Wojahn. Reference checks in
connection with the City Manager search were conducted.
Pursuant To §3-103 of the General Provisions Article of the Maryland Annotated Code, the
Mayor and City Council met in Administrative Function session from approximately 8:00 p.m. -
9:05 p.m. on Monday, August 3, 2015 (following the “Aging-In-Place Task Force” meeting) in
the Council Chambers of City Hall. Mayor Fellows and all members of the City Council were
present for this meeting. The City Council discussed the City Manager search.
College Park City Council Meeting Minutes
August 11, 2015
Page 12
Pursuant To §3-103 of the General Provisions Article of the Maryland Annotated Code, the
Mayor and City Council met in Administrative Function session from 11:25 p.m. (following the
Worksession) – 11:50 p.m. on Wednesday, August 5, 2015 in the Council Chambers of City
Hall. Mayor Fellows, all members of the City Council, and City Attorney Suellen Ferguson
were present for this meeting. The City Council discussed the City Manager search.
Agenda
TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 2015
CITY OF COLLEGE PARK
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
ORAL ARGUMENT – CPD-2015-01
4618 COLLEGE AVENUE
7:30 P.M.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
MEDITATION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Councilmember Mitchell
ROLL CALL
MINUTES: Public Hearing on Strategic Plan held on July 7, 2015; Special Session of July
7, 2015; Regular Meeting on July 14, 2015.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF DIGNITARIES
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEWLY APPOINTED BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEMBERS
AWARDS
PROCLAMATIONS
AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
CITY MANAGER’S REPORT: Joe Nagro
STUDENT LIAISON’S REPORT: Cole Holocker
COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
PRESENTATIONS
CONSENT AGENDA
15-R-12 Resolution Of The Mayor And Council Of The City Of College Park, Motion By:
Maryland Adopting The Recommendations Of The Advisory Planning To: Approve
Commission Regarding Variance Application Number CPV-2015-03, Second:
9735 Narragansett Parkway, College Park, Maryland, Recommending Aye: ____
Nay: ____
Approval Of A Variance From Section 27-120.01(C) Of The Prince
Other: _____
George’s County Zoning Ordinance, “Front Yards Of Dwellings,” To
Construct A Driveway In The Front Yard, 15.5 Feet In Width By 32.5 Feet
In Length
001
15-G-84 Award of a one-year contract extension (Option Year 3 in Contract
CP-13-01) to NZI Construction Corporation of Beltsville, MD for FY
’16 “Miscellaneous Concrete Maintenance and Asphalt
Resurfacing” in an amount not to exceed $721,000, funded from
Fund 301 Unrestricted C.I.P. Reserve
15-R-13 Resolution Of The Mayor And Council Of The City Of College Park,
Maryland Establishing A Framework For Evaluating Requests For
Recognitions And Commemorations
15-G-85 Approval of an Amendment to Contract CP-13-01 with NZI
Construction Corporation of Beltsville, MD for Miscellaneous
Downtown Streetscape Improvements in an amount not to exceed
$175,000 to be funded from C.I.P. #103001, Downtown
Streetscape #2, federal EDI Special Project Grant Program B-08-
SP-MD-0517, subject to a determination of proper form and legal
sufficiency by the City Attorney.
ACTION ITEMS
15-G-87 Adoption of the 2015-2020 Strategic Plan and Action Plan Motion By: Dennis
To: Approve
Second:
Aye: ____ Nay: ____
Other: _____
15-G-86 Approval of the scope of services for a feasibility study for Motion By: Mitchell
Hollywood Road extended at Mazza GrandMarc Apartments To: Approve
Second:
Aye: ____ Nay: ____
Other: _____
15-G-88 Approval of Amendment Three To Agreement Of Lease By Motion By: Day
And Between City Of College Park And Ledo Restaurant, To: Approve
Second:
Inc. Aye: ____ Nay: ____
Other: _____
15-O-04 Introduction Of Ordinance 15-O-04, An Ordinance Of The Motion By: Wojahn
Mayor And Council Of The City Of College Park, Amending To: Introduce
Second:
Chapter 175 “Taxation”, Article IV, “Revitalization Tax
Credit”, Sections §175-9 “Eligibility Requirements”; §175-10
“Eligibility Criteria”; §175-11 “Tax Credit – Amount And
Term”; §175-12 “Application Process”; And §175-13
“Waiver”, To Change Eligibility Requirements And Criteria,
To Clarify That A Tax Credit Will Be Granted Only If
Financially Feasible, To Clarify The Application Process, And
To Delete A Certain Waiver Option.
The Public Hearing is scheduled for 7:15 p.m. on
Tuesday, September 8, 2015 in the Council Chambers
002
15-G-89 Placeholder: Approval of the City Manager’s Employment Motion By:
Agreement To: Approve
Second:
Aye: ____ Nay: ____
Other: _____
15-G-91 Discussion and possible approval of a Council position on Motion By:
certain design issues on SHA’s proposed U.S. Route 1 To: Approve
Second:
reconstruction Aye: ____ Nay: ____
Other: _____
15-G-90 Appointments to Boards and Committees Motion By:
To: Approve
Second:
Aye: ____ Nay: ____
Other: _____
COUNCIL COMMENTS
COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE
ADJOURN
INFORMATION/STATUS REPORTS (For Council Review)
(None.)
This agenda is subject to change. For the most current information, please contact the City Clerk. In accordance
with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance, please contact the City Clerk’s Office
and describe the assistance that is necessary.
City Clerk’s Office: 240-487-3501
003
7:00 P.M.
ORAL
ARGUMENT
CPD-2015-01
4618
COLLEGE
AVENUE
004
From: Theresheia Williams
To:
Cc: Janeen S Miller
Subject: Steven Behr - CPD-2014-01
Date: Friday, July 31, 2015 4:43:52 PM
Below are the Dropbox links to access the files for Steven Behr, 4618 College Avenue, Case# CPD-2014-01.
There are two files, one from the Oral argument on January 27, 2015 and one from the Remand hearing with
APC on May 7, 2015.
If you would also like hard copies, let me know and I will provide them.
If you have any questions, please call or e-mail.
Theresheia.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/f9snq9b9o9gxr10/Steven%20Behr%20Oral%20Argument%20hearing%201.27.15.pdf?
dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/c7javkn1hp4kno3/Steven%20Behr%20Remand%20Hearing%205.7.15.pdf?dl=0
Theresheia Williams
Planning, Community & Economic Development
City of College Park
4500 Knox Road
College Park, MD 20740
P: 240-487-3538
F: 301-887-0558
005
MINUTES
006
MINUTES
Public Hearing of the College Park City Council
Tuesday, July 7, 2015
7:00 – 7:15 p.m.
Draft 2015-2020 Strategic Plan
PRESENT: Mayor Fellows; Councilmembers Kabir (arrived at 7:04 p.m.), Wojahn,
Brennan, Dennis, Stullich, Day, Hew and Mitchell.
ABSENT: None.
ALSO PRESENT: Joe Nagro, City Manager; Bill Gardiner, Assistant City Manager; Janeen
Miller, City Clerk; Suellen Ferguson, City Attorney; Bob Ryan, Director of
Public Services; Miriam Bader, Senior Planner; Cole Holocker, Student
Liaison.
Mayor Fellows opened the Public Hearing on the proposed 2015-2020 Strategic Plan at 7:00 p.m.
and invited consultant Catherine Tuck Parrish to provide an overview.
Ms. Tuck Parrish said that when this process began in January, we tried to answer three questions:
What do we know to be true (environmental scan - where are we now), what do we hope to be true in
the future (Council vision and goals for where we want to go), and what must go well in order to
make it so (action plan and implementation). She reviewed the process and timeline: there were four
focus groups with 55 participants; 223 respondents to the community survey; and council and staff
each had specific input. Council workshops were held in February. In March and April we sought
community input. During April – June the draft Strategic Plan was refined and sent to staff to
develop the action plan. Council should adopt the Strategic Plan in August and provide feedback to
staff on the Action Plan and give staff permission to move forward on implementation, identify any
additional staff or community resources that will be needed, place quarterly updates on Council
agendas going forward, and incorporate the plan into budget documents in the future.
Mayor Fellows invited public comment.
Mary Cook, 4705 Kiernan Road: Under “Excellent Services”: She has received some excellent
services from staff this year. She thinks that gas and water main replacement should be incorporated
into the Strategic Plan – we have aging infrastructure and have to keep them in good repair. Also
under “Excellent Services” she didn’t see anything about our seniors: we need to improve the
effectiveness of our service to senior citizens. Regarding communication: she saw there was
supposed to be a full time communication person: Rather than adding an FTE for communication we
should use the University. Regarding “Leadership” it takes good communication with your
constituents to make for good leadership. They have established a Civic Association Leaders
association that meets quarterly.
There being no further public comment, Mayor Fellows closed the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. and
announced that Council would take a brief recess and continue with discussion about the Strategic
Plan at 7:20 p.m.
__________________________________________
Janeen S. Miller, CMC Date Approved
City Clerk
007
MINUTES
Special Session of the College Park City Council
Tuesday, July 7, 2015
Council Chambers
10:18 p.m. – 10:52 p.m.
PRESENT: Mayor Fellows; Councilmembers Kabir, Wojahn, Brennan, Dennis,
Stullich, Day, Hew and Mitchell.
ABSENT: None
ALSO PRESENT: Joe Nagro, City Manager; Bill Gardiner, Assistant City Manager; Janeen
Miller, City Clerk; Suellen Ferguson, City Attorney; Bob Ryan, Director
of Public Services; Steve Beavers, Community Development Coordinator;
Cole Holocker, Student Liaison.
During a regularly scheduled Worksession of the College Park City Council, a motion was made
by Councilmember Kabir and seconded by Councilmember Day to enter into a Special Session
to discuss the University of Maryland’s proposal to sell beer and wine at University of Maryland
sporting events. The possibility of the Special Session was listed on the Worksession agenda.
The motion passed 8 – 0 – 0 and the Council entered Special Session at 10:18 p.m.
ACTION ITEMS
15-G-71 University of Maryland proposal to sell beer and wine at UMD sports events
Mayor Fellows said he would recuse himself from the discussion because of his affiliation with
the University of Maryland. Mayor Pro Tem Mitchell presided.
Prior to entering into the Special Session, the City Council heard presentations by Linda Carter,
attorney for the applicant; Dave Mitchell, Chief, University of Maryland Police Department; Joe
Mollineaux, Director, UMD Dining Services; and Dr. Amelia Arria, Associate Professor at the
UMD School of Public Health. After discussion, the City Council entered into a Special Session
to take a position on the University’s proposal. The matter is time sensitive because the BOLC
hearing is tomorrow.
A motion was made by Councilmember Stullich and seconded by Councilmember Day to
send a letter to the Board of License Commissioners in support of the University’s
proposed one-year trial period to sell beer and wine to patrons at athletic events, with
certain details to be included in the letter.
There were no comments from the audience nor was there any further discussion by the Council.
Roll Call Vote:
Aye: Dennis, Day, Stullich, Mitchell, Hew
Nay: Brennan, Kabir, Wojahn
Abstain: None
Motion passed 5 – 3 – 0.
008
College Park City Council
July 7, 2015 Special Session Minutes
Page 2
The City Council recessed the Special Session at 10:22 p.m. and Mayor Fellows returned to the
table.
Council reconvened in Special Session at 10:25 p.m. to consider a request from the College Park
City-University Partnership for a Resolution in support of their application to the state for the
Maryland Community Investment Tax Credit Program.
15-R-10 College Park City-University Partnership Application To The Maryland
Department Of Housing And Community Development For Allocation Of
Tax Credits Under The Community Investment Tax Credit Program
Eric Olson, Executive Director of the College Park City-University Partnership, said the
Partnership is applying to the state for a Community Investment Tax Credit that would allow a
50% tax credit for those who donate to the CPCUP. This is a state program to help non-profits
build their donor base. They need the City Council’s support on the resolution for the
application. They have not developed a program yet, but if they are awarded this incentive, they
might use funds to expand the homeownership program or the safety ambassadors program. If
Council agrees, they need the resolution tonight because the application is due July 9. The
possibility of the Special Session was listed on the Worksession agenda.
A motion was made by Councilmember Stullich and seconded by Councilmember Day to
adopt Resolution 15-R-10, A Resolution Of The Mayor And Council Of The City Of
College Park In Support Of The College Park City-University Partnership Application To
The Maryland Department Of Housing And Community Development For Allocation Of
Tax Credits Under The Community Investment Tax Credit Program.
Councilmember Stullich said this would be beneficial by encouraging individuals and businesses
to support the Partnership in the many wonderful things they are trying to do for our community.
Comments from the audience:
Carlo Colella, Vice President of the University of Maryland and Vice Chair of the College
Park City-University Partnership: Spoke in favor of this Resolution.
The motion passed 8 – 0 – 0.
The Council recessed from the Special Session at 10:27, and reconvened in Special Session at
10:51 p.m. to discuss a contract award. The possibility of this Special Session was listed on the
Worksession agenda.
15-G-72 Contract award to Victor Stanley, Inc. not to exceed $100,000 for US 1
streetscape furniture to be paid from an EDI grant.
Steve Beavers said that the City has funds remaining in the HUD Economic Development
Incentive Grant (EDI) that can pay for streetscape improvements along Route 1. A portion has
009
College Park City Council
July 7, 2015 Special Session Minutes
Page 3
already been spent. We have a preliminary design plan from College Avenue to Hartwick Road
for 9 benches, 15 tables, 14 trash/recycling bins and 4 planters. He is asking Council to approve
the contract, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, and to sole-source this purchase to
Victor Stanley, the vendor we have used in the past. The need for the Special Session is because
it takes Victor Stanley 8 – 10 weeks lead-time to manufacture these items, and we are running up
against a September deadline.
Councilmember Kabir asked when staff learned about this and why there is such a rush. Mr.
Beavers said we were waiting for State Highway Administration to make more progress on their
Route 1 plans so we could integrate our purchases with their design, but that hasn’t moved as
quickly as we hoped. We have used some funds to make some improvements in front of the
Bagel Place. There is a legislative deadline that this money has to be spent by the end of
September. Mr. Gardiner said this was a congressional earmark; the funds originally went to the
University of Maryland specifically for downtown College Park and then were transferred to the
City.
A motion was made by Councilmember Stullich and seconded by Councilmember Brennan
to authorize the purchase of streetscape furniture from Victor Stanley, Inc., in an amount
not to exceed $100,000.00, subject to the review and approval of a contract by the City
Attorney and confirmation by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
that all procurement and grant requirements for this contract have been met.
There were no comments from the audience or from the Council.
The motion passed 8 – 0 – 0.
ADJOURN: A motion was made by Councilmember Stullich and seconded by Councilmember
Brennan to adjourn the Special Session. With a vote of 8 – 0 – 0, Mayor Fellows adjourned the
Special Session at 10:52 p.m.
____________________________________________
Janeen S. Miller, CMC Date
City Clerk Approved
010
MINUTES
Regular Meeting of the College Park City Council
Tuesday, July 14, 2015
Council Chambers
7:52 p.m. – 8:28 p.m.
PRESENT: Mayor Fellows; Councilmembers Kabir, Wojahn, Brennan, Dennis,
Stullich, Day, Hew and Mitchell.
ABSENT: None.
ALSO PRESENT: Joe Nagro, City Manager; Janeen Miller, City Clerk; Bill Gardiner,
Assistant City Manager; Suellen Ferguson, City Attorney; Terry Schum,
Director of Planning; Bob Ryan, Director of Public Services; Peggy
Higgins, Director of Youth, Family and Senior Services; Jill Clements,
Director of Human Resources; Miriam Bader, Senior Planner; Cole
Holocker, Student Liaison.
Mayor Fellows opened the Regular Meeting at 7:52 p.m. after the conclusion of a 7:00 p.m.
Closed Session. Councilmember Hew led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Minutes: A motion was made by Councilmember Mitchell and seconded by Councilmember
Dennis to approve the minutes of the Special Session on June 2, 2015 and the Regular Meeting
on June 9, 2015. The motion passed 8 – 0 – 0.
Announcements:
Councilmember Hew said volunteers are needed to weed the permaculture garden on the Trolley
Trail on Thursday at 5:30 p.m.
Councilmember Day discussed the situation on Edmonston Road where part of the road gave
away. Washington Gas has responded and backfilled the trench.
Councilmember Brennan discussed the Next Door app that Berwyn has been using; the Prince
George’s County Police announced that they have partnered with them as well.
Councilmember Wojahn reminded everyone of next Monday’s “Live Smart, Eat Local” event at
Ledo’s Restaurant. The guest speaker is County Executive Rushern Baker. The College Park
Community Foundation is hosting a grant workshop on August 5 for groups interested in
applying for a grant from the CPCF.
Councilmember Kabir thanked those who participated in the Hollywood clean-up last weekend.
Amendments to the Agenda: Remove item 15-G-78. Add Field Use Request by College Park
Boys and Girls Club to Consent Agenda (15-G-80). Add consideration of a letter of support for
MilkBoy College Park grant application (15-G-82). Add consideration of a letter to Prince
George’s County opposing increase in fees for farmers markets and one day special event food
licenses (15-G-81).
011
College Park City Council Meeting Minutes
July 14, 2015
Page 2
City Manager’s Report: Mr. Nagro said this is the last Council meeting for the month of July.
The next Worksession will be Wednesday, August 5. National Night Out is Tuesday, August 4.
There is a Four Cities Meeting on Wednesday, July 29 at 7:30 p.m. in Berwyn Heights. Finally,
Mr. Nagro wished the City of College Park a Happy Birthday – this month is the 70th
anniversary of the incorporation of the City.
Student Liaison’s Report: Mr. Holocker reported that the second summer session has begun.
The UMD campus is busy hosting numerous events and organizations.
Comments From The Audience on Non-Agenda Items:
Oscar Gregory, 9253 Limestone Place: On June 10 he attended a meeting on the Park and
Planning Master Trail Plan because he had questions on the proposed connector trail to College
Park Woods. He circulated a petition through College Park Woods and asked people who are
opposed to this trail to sign the petition. He submitted the petitions to the City Council. The
estimated cost to build the trail from the end of DuPauw exceeds an alternate site under the
power lines. He would rather see the funds spent to revitalize the existing neighborhood park.
He asked the City Council to rescind their letter of support to Park and Planning on the proposed
connector trail.
CONSENT AGENDA
A motion was made by Councilmember Brennan and seconded by Councilmember Dennis
to adopt the consent agenda, which consisted of the following items:
15-G-73 Approval of a Field Use Request by Knight Management Group for use of
Duvall Field on Saturday, August 22, 2015 from 9:00 a.m. – 3:00 p.m.
15-R-06 Resolution Of The Mayor And Council Of The City Of College Park,
Maryland Adopting The Recommendation Of The Advisory Planning
Commission Regarding Request For Certification Of Non-Conforming Use
CNU-2013-05 For Church Of God, 8800 48th Avenue, College Park,
Maryland Recommending Approval Of The Request For Certification Of
Non-Conforming Use
15-R-07 Resolution Of The Mayor And Council Of The City Of College Park,
Maryland Adopting The Recommendations Of The Advisory Planning
Commission Regarding Variance Application Number CPV-2015-01, 5014
Roanoke Place, College Park, Maryland, Recommending Approval Of A
Variance From The Requirements Of The Prince George’s County Zoning
Ordinance, Section 27-442(C), Prescribing Maximum Lot Coverage
15-R-08 Resolution Of The Mayor And Council Of The City Of College Park,
Maryland Adopting The Recommendation Of The Advisory Planning
Commission And Granting Departure Application Number CPD-2015-01,
7402 Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland, Nando’s Peri-Peri,
Recommending A Departure Of 14 Parking Spaces And 1 Loading Space
012
College Park City Council Meeting Minutes
July 14, 2015
Page 3
15-G-74 Approval of a contract in substantially the form attached between the City of
College Park and Navitus, Inc. of Annapolis, Maryland, an approved
PEPCO Trade Ally, in an amount not to exceed $70,368 for energy efficiency
retrofitting of parking garage lighting. The City will be reimbursed $65,620
under the PEPCO Small Business Program Lighting Incentive and the
balance of $4,748 will be reimbursed by a grant from the Maryland Energy
Administration
15-R-11 Adoption of Resolution 15-R-11, A Resolution Of Mayor And Council Of
The City Of College Park, Maryland To Apply For And Accept Community
Legacy Funding To Be Used For Calvert Road School Improvements
15-G-76 Approval of the extension of the Police Services Agreement with Prince
George’s County for full-time contract police from October 2014 – October
2017, and ratification of the contract extension from October 2014 to July
2015
15-G-77 Approval of a letter to the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
regarding proposed service reductions on Metro’s Green Line
15-G-80 Approval of a Field Use Request for College Park Boys and Girls Club for
summer soccer scrimmages at Duvall Field
ACTION ITEMS:
15-G-75 Approval, with conditions, of the Preliminary Plan of Subdivision
4-13012 for the Pregnancy Aid Center, 4700 Erie Street
A motion was made by Councilmember Kabir and seconded by Councilmember Wojahn
that the City Council recommend approval of Preliminary Plan of Subdivision 4-13012 and
a public utility variation request for the Pregnancy Aid Center located at 4700 Erie Street
subject to conditions 1-10 in the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning
Commission technical staff report and the following condition: Prior to final plat approval,
revise the plan to correct the ultimate right-of-way for 48th Avenue from 40-feet to 50-feet.
Councilmember Kabir said the Prince George’s County Planning Board is scheduled to hear this
application on July 16, 2015. The Pregnancy Aid Center is proposing a 3,102 square foot
addition to an existing medical facility and will also be filing a Detailed Site Plan application.
There were no comments from the audience or from the Council
The motion passed 8 – 0 – 0.
15-G-82 Discussion of letter in support of MilkBoy grant application – no action
Mayor Fellows said the City has been asked to provide a letter of support for a grant application
to the Prince George’s County Redevelopment Authority for the MilkBoy College Park Project.
013
College Park City Council Meeting Minutes
July 14, 2015
Page 4
Mr. Gardiner said he checked with the staff at the Redevelopment Authority and learned that the
Redevelopment Authority had this grant program last year; this would be for the second round of
funds for this program but it hasn’t been announced yet. If the guidelines are the same in the
second round, the cap would be $50,000 and the applicant would have to be a non-profit
organization. He was told that it would be announced in August and applications would be
accepted in September.
Mayor Fellows asked if we should until we have all the details. Mr. Gardiner said unless there is
some other reason for urgency, Council might want to have a presentation on this project from
the applicant before going forward.
15-G-81 Letter to County in opposition to increase in fees for local farmers markets
from $175 to $250 and for one-day special event food permits from $25 to
$125 (CB-41-2015)
A motion was made by Councilmember Wojahn and seconded by Councilmember Kabir to
express opposition to the increases in fees in CB-41-2015 to the one-day special event food
vendor’s permit from $25 to $125 each, and opposition to the increase in the farmers
market permit from $175 - $250 each.
Councilmember Wojahn said this was brought to his attention by County Council Member
Glaros and by Denise Seifried, the College Park Day event planner. The bill hasn’t passed yet
but these are in effect retroactively. His concern is that the 500% increase in the one-day special
event food vendor permits would negatively impact College Park Day because it would be more
expensive, and thereby more difficult, for vendors to participate. He is not sure how this would
impact farmers markets for the season but it would make it more expensive for them to
participate.
There were no comments from the audience.
Councilmember Mitchell said this bill has been sent to the other municipalities in the County.
Councilmember Kabir asked that this item be added to the next Four Cities Agenda.
The motion passed 8 – 0 – 0.
15-G-79 Appointments to Boards and Committees
A motion was made by Councilmember Brennan and seconded by Councilmember Dennis to
appoint Lois Donaty to the Animal Welfare Committee. The motion passed 8 – 0 – 0.
COUNCIL COMMENTS: Councilmember Kabir said that National Night Out is August 4 and
north College Park will have an event at 6:30 p.m. at Duvall Field.
COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE: None.
014
College Park City Council Meeting Minutes
July 14, 2015
Page 5
ADJOURN: A motion was made by Councilmember Wojahn and seconded by Councilmember
Mitchell to adjourn the regular meeting and to reconvene into a Worksession. The motion
passed 8 – 0 – 0 and Mayor Fellows adjourned the regular meeting at 8:28 p.m.
____________________________________________
Janeen S. Miller, CMC Date
City Clerk Approved
Pursuant To §3-103 of the General Provisions Article of the Maryland Annotated Code, the
Mayor and City Council met in Administrative Function session from 7:00 p.m. – 7:45 p.m. on
Monday, July 6, 2015 in the Council Chambers of City Hall. Mayor Fellows and all members of
the City Council were present for this meeting. The City Council discussed the City Manager
search.
Pursuant to §C6-3 of the College Park City Charter, at 7:05 p.m. on July 14, 2015, a motion was
made by Councilmember Dennis and seconded by Councilmember Mitchell to enter into a
Closed Session to discuss a personnel matter related to specific individual(s). The motion passed
5 – 0 – 0 and the Council entered into the closed session at 7:05 p.m.
Present: Mayor Andrew Fellows; Councilmembers Wojahn, Brennan, Dennis, Hew and
Mitchell.
Absent: Councilmembers Kabir, Stullich and Day.
Also Present: Joe Nagro, City Manager; Suellen Ferguson, City Attorney; Bill Gardiner,
Assistant City Manager; Bob Ryan, Director of Public Services; Sgt. Selway and Lt. Keleti were
present for part of the meeting.
Topics Discussed: The City Council was advised about a personnel matter. The City Council
discussed a personnel matter.
Actions Taken: None.
Adjourn: A motion was made by Councilmember Brennan and seconded by Councilmember
Dennis to adjourn the closed session, and at 7:50 p.m. with a vote of 5 – 0 – 0, Mayor Fellows
adjourned the meeting.
015
15-R-12
016
15-R-12
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE
PARK, MARYLAND ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE ADVISORY
PLANNING COMMISSION REGARDING VARIANCE APPLICATION NUMBER
CPV-2015-03, 9735 NARRAGANSETT PARKWAY, COLLEGE PARK, MARYLAND,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 27-120.01(C) OF
THE PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE, “FRONT YARDS OF
DWELLINGS,” TO CONSTRUCT A DRIVEWAY IN THE FRONT YARD, 15.5 FEET
IN WIDTH BY 32.5 FEET IN LENGTH
WHEREAS, the City of College Park, Maryland (hereinafter, the "City") has, pursuant to
§190-1 et seq., and in accordance with Section 27-924 of the Prince George's
County Zoning Ordinance (hereinafter, "Zoning Ordinance"), enacted
procedural regulations governing any or all of the following: departures from
design and landscaping standards, parking and loading standards, sign design
standards, and variances for lot size, setback, and similar requirements for land
within the corporate boundaries of the City, alternative compliance from
landscaping requirements, certification, revocation, and revision of
nonconforming uses, and minor changes to approved special exceptions; and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized by the Ordinance to grant an application for a waiver or
variance for lot size, setback, and similar requirements where, by reason of
exceptional narrowness, shallowness, shape, topography, or other extraordinary
situation or condition of the specific parcel of property, the strict application of
the Zoning Ordinance would result in peculiar and unusual practical difficulties
or an exceptional or undue hardship upon the owner of the property, and a
variance can be granted without substantial impairment of the intent, purpose
and integrity of the General Plan or Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, Section 27-422 (c), Table II, of the Prince George’s County Zoning Ordinance
prescribes a maximum lot coverage of 30% in the R-55 zoning district; and
WHEREAS, the Advisory Planning Commission (hereinafter "APC") is authorized by §190-3
of the City Code to hear requests for variances from the terms of the Zoning
Ordinance with respect to lot size, setback, and other requirements from which a
variance may be granted by the Prince George’s County Board of Appeals,
including variances from Section 27-442(c) of the Prince George’s County
Zoning Ordinance, and to make recommendations to the Mayor and Council in
connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, Section 27-120.01 (c) of the Zoning Ordinance stipulates that no parking
space, parking area, or parking structure other than a driveway no wider
than its associated garage, carport, or other parking structure may be
built in the front yard of a dwelling, except a townhouse or multifamily
dwelling, in the area between the front street line and the sides of the
dwelling; and
017
15-R-12
WHEREAS, on May 15, 2015, Leonardo Gonzalez (hereinafter, the “Applicant”), submitted
an application for a variance from Prince George’s County Zoning Ordinance,
Section 27-120.01 (c), to permit construction of a 15.5-foot by 32.5-foot
driveway or a 22.5-foot by 27.5-foot driveway in front of the house at the
premises known as 9735 Narragansett Parkway, College Park, Maryland (the
“Property”);
WHEREAS, on July 2, 2015, the APC conducted a hearing on the merits of the application, at
which time the APC heard testimony and accepted evidence, including the staff
report and Exhibits 1 – 7 with respect to whether the subject application meets
the standards for granting a variance set forth in the Ordinance.
WHEREAS, based upon the evidence and testimony presented, the APC voted 4-0-0 to
recommend that the variance be granted; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council are authorized by §190-6 to accept or deny the
recommendation of the APC with respect to variance requests; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council have reviewed the recommendation of the APC as to the
Application and in particular have reviewed the APC’s findings of fact and
conclusions of law; and
WHEREAS, no exceptions have been filed; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council are in agreement with and hereby adopt the findings of
fact and conclusions of law of the APC as to the Application as follows:
Section 1. Findings of Fact
1.1 The property is located at 9735 Narragansett Parkway in the Hollywood
subdivision.
1.2 The North College Park Citizens Association is the civic association that
represents the area in which the property is located.
1.3 The property is zoned R-55.
1.4 The Applicant is proposing to construct a driveway for two vehicles.
The property has a curb-cut but no driveway.
1.5 The property is located at the end of a small cul-de-sac resulting in an
irregular, triangular shape with a narrow width at the property line.
1.6 The property has an area of 8,960 SF or .21 acres.
1.7 The property is improved with a 1,127 square foot, one-story, brick,
single-family house.
1.8 The subject house was constructed in 1950.
1.9 The immediate neighborhood is zoned R-55, single-family residential.
018
15-R-12
1.10 The one-way cul-de-sac serves eight (8) properties.
1.11 Three (3) of the properties on the cul-de-sac have single-wide driveways
and five (5), including the applicant’s property, do not have driveways.
1.12 In this neighborhood, it is customary for people to be able to park in their
driveway or close to their home.
1.13 On-street parking is on one side of the street because it is one-way and is
further limited due to the configuration of the cul-de-sac.
1.14 The narrow width of the property at the street line and the location of the
house make it impossible to provide parking on-site that complies with
the regulations.
1.15 Perpendicular parking is permitted in the cul-de-sac but restricts the
turning radius, which can impede emergency vehicles from servicing the
properties.
1.16 Permit parking in the cul-de-sac is insufficient to limit the parking and
serve the needs of the residents.
1.17 The Applicant must routinely park on Narragansett, his vehicles being
out-of-sight from his residence which creates vehicle-safety concerns.
Section 2 Conclusions of Law
The Mayor and Council makes the following conclusions of law with regard to
CPV-2015-03 for a Variance from Section 27-120.01 (c) of the Prince George’s
County Zoning Ordinance, “Front Yards of Dwellings,” to expand a driveway in
the front yard to a width of 15.5-feet and a length of 32.5-feet or a driveway in
the front yard to a width of 22.5-feet and a length of 27.5 feet
2.1 The property has an exceptional topographic condition due to its
exceptional shape. The frontage is at the end of a cul-de-sac resulting in
a curved front property line that is only 28.88-feet wide. Given the
location and configuration of the house on the lot, there is insufficient
room to construct a driveway alongside the house.
2.2 Despite permit parking, the number of parking spaces on the street is
insufficient to accommodate residents. The strict application of the
Zoning Ordinance will result in an unusual practical difficulty by making
it more difficult for the Applicant to park his vehicles within sight of his
home.
2.3 Granting a single-wide driveway variance will not impair the intent and
purpose of the applicable County General Plan or County Master Plan,
because similarly configured driveways exist in this cul-de-sac.
Moreover, the driveway will help to reduce the perpendicular parking in
the cul-de-sac, thereby helping city and emergency vehicles to service
the street.
019
15-R-12
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor and Council of the City of College
Park, Maryland that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the APC are
hereby adopted and approval of a variance from Section 27-120.01 (c) to
encroach in the front yard with a driveway not to exceed a width of 15.5-feet
wide and a length of 32.5-feet for a total encroachment of 504 square feet is
granted.
ADOPTED, by the Mayor and Council of the City of College Park, Maryland at a regular
meeting on the 11th day of August 2015.
CITY OF COLLEGE PARK,
MARYLAND
Janeen S. Miller, CMC Andrew M. Fellows, Mayor
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
Suellen M. Ferguson
City Attorney
020
15-G-84
021
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor & Council
Through: Joe Nagro, City Manager
From: Steven E. Halpern, P.E.
Date: July 29, 2015
Subject: Award of Miscellaneous Concrete Maintenance and Asphalt Resurfacing RFP
CP-13-01 – Contract Option with NZI Construction Corporation for FY16.
(Proposed Consent)
Background
On May 24, 2012, sealed bids were opened for the FY13 Miscellaneous Concrete Maintenance
and Asphalt Resurfacing project, RFP CP-13-01. NZI Construction Corporation of Beltsville,
MD was awarded the base contract. The CP-13-01 contract was a 1-year contract with 3 optional
1-year extensions. The contract was renewed for FY14 and FY15.
NZI Construction Corporation has agreed to maintain their current unit prices. The term of this
3rd option is from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016 (fiscal year 2016).
We have projected that we will spend about $721,000 in FY16.
NZI Construction Corporation was the successful bidder for our previous contract, CP-09-01.
Their current work performance under the CP-13-01 contract has been exceptional.
Funding source: Fund 301 Unrestricted C.I.P. Reserve.
Recommendation
Based on staff’s review of the subject contract performance, it is recommended that Contract CP-
13-01 (Option Year 3), Miscellaneous Concrete Maintenance and Asphalt Resurfacing, be
awarded to NZI Construction Corp. of Beltsville, MD in an amount not to exceed $721,000.
022
15-R-13
023
15-R-13
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE PARK, MARYLAND
ESTABLISHING A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING
REQUESTS FOR RECOGNITIONS AND COMMEMORATIONS
WHEREAS, The Mayor and Council of the City of College Park may wish to recognize certain
individuals in the community who have made noteworthy contributions to the
City; and
WHEREAS, The City also receives requests to commemorate certain individuals and events
taking place in the City; and
WHEREAS, The Mayor and City Council wish to establish a framework to evaluate the
various requests received for such recognitions and commemorations and to help
guide future evaluations; and
WHEREAS, Mayor Fellows established an “Ad Hoc Recognition Committee” which met in
2015 to recommend a framework to help evaluate such requests; and
WHEREAS, the Ad Hoc Recognition Committee reviewed and considered Resolution 00-R-
10A, “A Resolution of the Mayor and Council of the City of College Park,
Maryland adopting a Policy to Recognize and Commemorate Citizens by Naming
A City Facility Or Other Public Property In Their Name” which was adopted on
April 25, 2000, and Resolution 13-R-04, “A Resolution of the Mayor and Council
of the City of College Park Establishing The Jack Perry Award” which was
adopted on February 26, 2013.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor and Council of the City of College Park
that the following guidelines for evaluating requests for recognitions and commemorations be
adopted:
1. Organizations, elected officials, residents and staff of the City of College Park may recommend
individuals for recognition. Recommendations should be submitted in writing to the Mayor, City
Manager or City Clerk, and shall state the reasons why the individual should be considered.
2. The type of recognition shall be commensurate with the contributions of the individual, and shall
be considered within the context of Attachment 1, Evaluation Chart, which lists previous City
recognitions in order of prestige and expense.
3. Some of the criteria to be considered when evaluating said requests will include:
Length of service
Chair of a City-appointed Board, Commission or Committee
Overall impact of the contribution to the City’s wellbeing, welfare or quality of life
Something that brings honor and prestige to the City
024
15-R-13
4. Only those residents who have made the most significant and outstanding contributions to the
City of College Park shall be recognized by the naming of a City facility or other public property
in their honor. Such recognition would normally be considered posthumously.
5. City-appointed Authorities, Boards, Commissions and Committees that wish to officially honor
past members and/or spend City funds to do so, must send the recommendation of the body to
the City Council for Council review and action.
6. At the discretion of the Mayor, in consultation with the City Clerk and other staff as appropriate,
the City may offer proclamations, certificates, or letters on the Mayor’s personal stationery, in
response to requests to commemorate individuals and/or events taking place in the City.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Resolution 13-R-04 establishing the Jack Perry Award remains in
effect.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Resolution 00-R-10A, adopted April 25, 2000, be repealed in its
entirety.
ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of College Park, Maryland at a regular meeting
on the _______ day of _____________________, 2015.
EFFECTIVE the ________ day of _____________________, 2015.
WITNESS: THE CITY OF COLLEGE PARK,
MARYLAND
____________________________ ______________________________
Janeen S. Miller, CMC, City Clerk Andrew M. Fellows, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY
______________________________
Suellen M. Ferguson
City Attorney
025
15-R-13
City Recognition Evaluation Chart
Attachment 1
Type of Recognition Who approves
1 Name a City place or building after the person Council Action
(normally considered posthumously)
2 Host a Reception to honor the person and give them a
proclamation
3 The Mayor presents the “Key to the City” – this includes a Decision of the Mayor
proclamation who will notify the
City Council
4 Proclaim a “Day” for the person – this includes a
proclamation and plaque
5 Purchase and plant a tree and install an engraved plaque at
the base of the tree
6 Purchase and install a bench with an engraved plaque
7 Present an engraved desk clock
8 Present a custom wood plaque
9 Present a Lucite plaque
10 Place an engraved plaque on an existing bench
11 Prepare a Proclamation to be listed on the agenda and read at
a Council meeting
12 Provide a Proclamation signed by the Mayor Mayor only
13 Provide a Certificate of Appreciation or Letter of
Congratulations signed by the Mayor
026
15-G-85
027
jJork se_ ~ s i' o/\. I f-e vvt-=#-) 0
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Terry Schum, Planning Director --fA>o
THROUGH: Joseph L. Nagro, City Manager ~
DATE: August 5, 2015
SUBJECT: Amendment to Contract CP-13-01 with NZI Construction
Corporation for Miscellaneous Downtown Streetscape
Improvements
ISSUE
The NZI Construction Corporation has provided a cost estimate for the implementation
of various downtown streetscape improvements under the soon to expire HUD
Economic Development Initiative (EDI) grant for Route 1. The contract was bid in
conformance with federal purchasing requirements and an amendment is needed in
order to include this work under the contract.
SUMMARY
The scope of work will generally be in accordance with the attached plan and will
include the following in an amount not to exceed $175,000 :
1. Install street furniture (benches, tables, bicycle racks, planters) purchased from
Victor Stanley (approved by City Council on July 7, 2015).
2. Remove/grind existing tree stumps and install new trees and structural soil.
3. Remove and replace concrete curb and gutter.
4 . Remove and replace concrete sidewalk area.
5. Furnish and install new French drain.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that CP-13-01 be amended to include this additional scope of work
in an amount not to exceed $175,000. The project is CIP# 103001, Downtown
Streetscape #2 , federal EDI Special Project Grant Program 8-08-SP-MD-0517.
028
~ ~ ~ i i i ~ ~ l
! i i !
Il I~ !
ii
~
!
l
li ti Hltf til It i ~
~
!I ~~
il II f i
ire ~ li ~ II l iI I
. ... :I !
i .
.
li! .i .~~, ~ .
~r
t .H
! ~u
I ~ ~IJ
• i
~
•i ~
•
•
~2:'
1~§~ : ,II~
~
~
..HWHI . •i
H~ I
!
~
i I
.
~ 2
~ IH((ImU,
"' ; OVERALL SITE PLAN
~
~ • -: STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
~ '-----RO ~~j~~
- PROGAE:SS SET · NOT FOR CO~~ucnON - UTE- 1 - - - -
'iji:~ :, 1!11
College Park, MD Ell '!:~ ;: ql
~ II
:::r
;;!
; II•}
ot
~~ 1
~~~ ~·lliilllill.·:.
029
15-G-87
030
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER DENNIS 15-G-87
MOTION:
I move for the adoption of the 2015–2020 Strategic Plan and Action Plan,
which establish a new City Vision, Mission, Values, and Goals for the next five
years. The Action Plan identifies the specific steps City staff will take in order
to accomplish the Strategic Plan goals.
DISCUSSION:
In late 2014 the City Council initiated the development of a new Strategic Plan with the
assistance of The Novak Consulting Group.
The process included an environmental scan, focus group meetings, an online survey, public
hearings, and all-day workshops with Council and with staff.
The Strategic Plan that Council is presenting tonight for adoption articulates a new community
vision for College Park, and establishes new goals and steps to achieve our vision.
The 2020 Strategic Plan Goals are:
1. One College Park
2. Environmental Sustainability
3. High Quality Development and Reinvestment
4. Quality Infrastructure
5. Effective Leadership
6. Excellent Services
With input from Council, City staff have developed and refined an Action Plan that identifies the
steps that City departments will carry out to accomplish the goals. The Action Plan will be
updated regularly, and Council may add or change items.
Council and staff will work to ensure that residents, businesses, and our partners in the region
understand and embrace the City’s vision and goals.
031
15-G-86
032
MOTION FOR COUNCILMEMBER MITCHELL ITEM # 15-G-86
I move that the scope of services submitted by VIKA Maryland, LLC for a feasibility
study to extend Hollywood Road west of US Route 1 to the Mazza GrandMarc
Apartments be approved subject to the following modifications:
1. Item # 2 under Project Assumptions shall be revised to state that the alternative
alignments should be designed to minimize the impact to adjoining properties to
the extent possible and that consideration may be given to a one-way alignment
alternative if practicable.
2. Item #11 under Project Assumptions shall be revised to clarify that there will be a
minimum of two meetings with community stakeholders; one meeting to review
the alternative alignments to be studied and one meeting to present the final
results of the study.
3. Item # 3 Hollywood Road Site Layout and Grading Plan under Scope of Services
shall be revised to include community stakeholders in the discussions with the
client and city staff in determining the three alternative alignments to be studied.
4. Item # 9 Project Meetings under Scope of Services shall be revised to add
adjoining property owners, community stakeholders and city staff to those
already listed.
Comments:
$500,000 is held in escrow by Starr Insurance Holding, Inc. for the planning,
design and construction of the extension of Hollywood Road west of Route 1 as
required under an Agreement with the City. The feasibility study is estimated to
cost $66,500.
The study will be conducted by VIKA engineers under the supervision of Starr
and in conjunction with city staff, adjoining property owners and community
stakeholders. The results will be presented to the City Council at which time the
next steps will be considered.
033
15-G-88
(Material to be
provided next week)
034
15-O-04
035
15-O-04
ORDINANCE
OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE PARK, AMENDING
CHAPTER 175 “TAXATION”, ARTICLE IV, “REVITALIZATION TAX CREDIT”,
SECTIONS §175-9 “ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS”; §175-10 “ELIGIBILITY
CRITERIA”; §175-11 “TAX CREDIT – AMOUNT AND TERM”; §175-12
“APPLICATION PROCESS”; AND §175-13 “WAIVER”, TO CHANGE ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS AND CRITERIA, TO CLARIFY THAT A TAX CREDIT WILL BE
GRANTED ONLY IF FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE, TO CLARIFY THE APPLICATION
PROCESS, AND TO DELETE A CERTAIN WAIVER OPTION.
WHEREAS, the State of Maryland, pursuant to 9-318(g) of the Tax-Property Article,
Annotated Code of Maryland, has authorized the establishment of revitalization districts by
resolution for the purpose of encouraging redevelopment and the granting of a property tax
credit against the City’s real property tax for a property located within the revitalization district
that is constructed or substantially redeveloped in conformance with adopted eligibility criteria
and reassessed as a result of the construction or redevelopment at a higher value than that
assessed prior to the construction or redevelopment; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council determined that it is in the public interest to
provide for the establishment of revitalization tax districts and to set the criteria for designation
of such districts, and adopted Article IV, Revitalization Tax Credit, of Chapter 175, “Taxation”
for this purpose; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council have determined that it is in the public interest
to amend certain provisions of the Revitalization Tax Credit Article.
Section 1. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED, by the Mayor
and Council of the City of College Park, Maryland that Chapter 175 “Taxation”, Article IV
“Revitalization Tax Credit” §175-9, “Eligibility requirements” be and it is hereby repealed, re-
enacted and amended to read as follows:
____________________________________
CAPS : Indicate matter added to existing law.
[Brackets] : Indicate matter deleted from law.
Asterisks * * * : Indicate matter remaining unchanged in existing law but not set forth in Ordinance
036
15-O-04
§175-9 Eligibility requirements.
To be eligible for the tax credit, a property must meet the following eligibility [criteria]
REQUIREMENTS:
A. Improvements must include new construction, reconstruction, or rehabilitation of
residential [(excluding single family detached)], commercial, hospitality, or mixed-use
properties, EXCLUDING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOUSING, MULTI-
FAMILY HOUSING INTENDED TO HOUSE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS,
AND DIRECT, EXTERIOR ROOM ACCESS HOTELS AND MOTELS.
B. The applicant must be in good standing with the City [of College Park’s Public Services
and Finance Departments]. In order to be in good standing, applicants may not have any
outstanding code OR ZONING violations or be delinquent on any payments including,
but not limited to, trash bills, permit fees, FINES and City tax payments.
C. Projects are ineligible for this program if they are located within a tax increment
financing district at the time of application, OR IN A REGIONAL INSTITUTION
STRATEGIC ENTERPRISE (“RISE”) ZONE DESIGNATED UNDER §5-1401 OF
THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ARTICLE, ANNOTATED CODE OF
MARYLAND AND ARE LOCATED ON A PROPERTY RECEIVING OR
APPLYING FOR A TAX CREDIT UNDER §9-103.1 OF THE TAX-PROPERTY
ARTICLE, ANNOTATED CODE OF MARYLAND. IN ADDITION, THE OWNERS
AND ASSIGNS OF ANY PROPERTY RECEIVING A CITY TAX CREDIT UNDER
THIS ARTICLE MUST AGREE TO FOREGO ANY FUTURE APPLICATION OR
RECEIPT OF A RISE ZONE TAX CREDIT.
D. * * * *
2
037
15-O-04
E. AN APPLICATION FOR A CITY TAX CREDIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED NO
LATER THAN THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE FOR THE INITIAL DETAILED
SITE PLAN FOR THE PROJECT BY THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL
PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION (M-NCPPC), IF APPLICABLE, OR THE
SUBMISSION OF A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TO PRINCE GEORGE'S
COUNTY. Projects that are under construction, completed, or have an approved
detailed site plan or building permit prior to the adoption of this program are not
eligible for the tax credit.
Section 2. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Mayor and Council
of the City of College Park Maryland that Chapter 175 “Taxation”, Article IV “Revitalization Tax
Credit” §175-10, “Eligibility criteria” be and it is hereby repealed, re-enacted and amended to
read as follows:
§175-10 Eligibility criteria
When evaluating whether a project will receive a tax credit under this article, the City Council will
use the following criteria. For projects located within the boundaries of Tax Credit District 1, at
least 4 of the criteria must be met; and for projects located within the boundaries of Tax Credit
District 2, at least 2 of the criteria must be met.
A. The MAJORITY OF THE LAND AREA OF THE PROPERTY UPON WHICH
project is located IS within a ½-mile radius of an existing or under construction rail
station for THE Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Maryland Area
Regional Commuter, Maryland Transit Administration, or similar agency.
B. * * * *
3
038
15-O-04
C. The project involves the SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENT OF FUNDS IN THE buyout
of leases, SUCH AS LONG TERM LEASES, to facilitate redevelopment.
D. The project will complete, or commit funds for, substantial infrastructure improvements
such as a new or relocated traffic signal, a public street, a public park, a public parking
garage, undergrounding of utilities, or SUPPORT FOR a bikeshare SYSTEM [station].
E. The project [meets] EXCEEDS the REQUIRED PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY
minimum green building guidelines as established by the US Green Building Council’s
LEED [Silver] Certification for the project’s appropriate rating system AND IN ANY
EVENT MEETS THE MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR A LEED SILVER
CERTIFICATION. A LEED scorecard must be submitted with the detailed site plan
application and evidence of certification MUST BE SUBMITTED at the time of final
application for the tax credit.
F. The MAJORITY OF THE LAND AREA OF THE PROPERTY ON WHICH THE
project is located IS within one of the walkable development nodes designated in the
approved Central US 1 Corridor Sector Plan.
G. The project involves the demolition of an existing non-historic structure, which has
been vacant at least one year, OR THE DEMOLITION OF A HOTEL OR MOTEL
WITH DIRECT EXTERIOR ROOM ACCESS.
H. * * * *.
I. The project has secured at least one locally-owned, non-franchise business
TOTALLING AT LEAST 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF SPACE as evidenced by executed
lease agreements OF AT LEAST FIVE YEARS DURATION at the time of final
application for the tax credit.
4
039
15-O-04
J. The project provides AT LEAST 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF space for a business
incubator, community center, art gallery, or similar public-benefit use.
Section 3. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Mayor and Council
of the City of College Park Maryland that Chapter 175 “Taxation”, Article IV “Revitalization Tax
Credit” §175-11, “Tax credit - amount and term” be and it is hereby repealed, re-enacted and
amended to read as follows:
§175-11 Tax Credit: amount and term
An eligible property may receive a five-year tax credit on City real property taxes based on the
increased assessment attributed to the taxable improvements upon project completion as
determined by the Supervisor of Assessments. The tax credit shall be in an amount equal to
75% of the increased assessment of City tax imposed in the first year; 60% in the second year;
45% in the third year; 30% in the fourth year; and 15% in the fifth year, PROVIDED
HOWEVER, THAT IF SUCH A TAX CREDIT IS NOT FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE BASED
ON CITY BUDGET CONSTRAINTS, THE COUNCIL MAY REDUCE OR ELIMINATE
THE AMOUNT AND/OR DURATION, AND/OR ALTER THE SEQUENCE, OF THE TAX
CREDIT. The tax credit is transferable to subsequent property owners within the term of the
original agreement.
Section 4. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Mayor and Council
of the City of College Park Maryland that Chapter 175 “Taxation”, Article IV “Revitalization Tax
Credit” §175-12, “Application process” be and it is hereby repealed, re-enacted and amended to
read as follows:
5
040
15-O-04
§175-12 Application process.
The application process is as follows:
A. * * * *
B. City staff review [and recommendation]. Upon receipt and acceptance of a completed
application, the City's Planning, Community, and Economic Development department will refer
a copy of the application to the finance department. City staff will provide aN
[recommendation] ELIGIBILITY REPORT to the City Council WITH RESPECT TO THE
APPLICATION for a tax credit [at the time of] SUBSEQUENT TO THE detailed site plan
review [before] BY the City Council. For projects that do not require a detailed site plan, staff
will review building permit plans and schedule the application for review by the City Council
at a City Council work session.
C. City Council resolution. A City Council resolution must be approved to authorize the award
of a tax credit. The approval will be contingent on all required terms of the revitalization tax
credit program being met at the time of final application. If the Prince George's County
Planning Board, the District Council, or any other government agency with authority changes
the City-approved conditions for the detailed site plan after the resolution has been adopted,
staff will review the changes and provide a supplemental [recommendation for] REPORT
CONCERNING the tax credit authorization that the City Council will rely upon with respect to
determining whether it should reconsider the authorization.
D. Final application approval. Prior to final [acceptance] APPROVAL of the application for a
City tax credit, documentation must be submitted to the City's Director of Finance, including a
legal description of the property, proof of a properly issued use and occupancy permit
6
041
15-O-04
applicable to eligible improvements, evidence of compliance with any City agreement or
required certifications, COPIES OF ALL LEASES TO LOCALLY-OWNED, NON-
FRANCHISE BUSINESSES USED AS A BASIS FOR ELIGIBILITY, CERTIFICATION OF
LEED STATUS, and such other information or documentation as the Director may require.
Upon final acceptance the City will issue a certificate to the property owner that confirms the
parcel's tax credit status. A copy of the certificate will be sent to the Prince George's County
Supervisor of Assessments who will determine the value of improvement.
Section 5. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Mayor and Council
of the City of College Park Maryland that Chapter 175 “Taxation”, Article IV “Revitalization Tax
Credit” §175-13, “Waiver” be and it is hereby repealed, re-enacted and amended to read as
follows:
§175-13 WAIVER
A. If it finds that the purposes of this article will be equally well served by doing so, the
Council may waive the requirement in § 175-12 that an application must be filed no later than
the date of acceptance for a detailed site plan, if applicable, or a building permit application,
and consider whether to grant a tax credit under the following circumstances for projects for
which no appeal was filed by the City:
(1) When the application is filed prior to the approval of the detailed site plan or issuance of the
building permit; or
(2) [Notwithstanding § 175-9E, if the detailed site plan was approved after January 1, 2009, the
project has been constructed, and the project satisfies at least the minimum required criteria
identified in § 175-10 for the district; or
7
042
15-O-04
(3)] If a detailed site plan has been approved, but construction has not occurred, for the purpose
of encouraging the construction; or
[(4)] (3) For an application that is timely filed, when the minimum requirements of § 175-10
are not met.
B. – C. * * * *
Section 6. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Mayor and Council
of the City of College Park that, upon formal introduction of this proposed Ordinance, which shall
be by way of a motion duly seconded and without any further vote, the City Clerk shall distribute a
copy to each Council member and shall maintain a reasonable number of copies in the office of
the City Clerk and shall publish this proposed ordinance or a fair summary thereof in a newspaper
having a general circulation in the City of College Park together with a notice setting out the time
and place for a public hearing thereon and for its consideration by the Council. The public
hearing, hereby set for _________ P.M. on the ___________ day of
_________________________, 2015, shall follow the publication by at least seven (7) days, may
be held separately or in connection with a regular or special Council meeting and may be
adjourned from time to time. All persons interested shall have an opportunity to be heard. After
the hearing, the Council may adopt the proposed ordinance with or without amendments or reject
it. As soon as practicable after adoption, the City Clerk shall have a fair summary of the
Ordinance and notice of its adoption published in a newspaper having a general circulation in the
City of College Park and available at the City's offices. This Ordinance shall become effective on
_____________________________, 2015 provided that a fair summary of this Ordinance is
published at least once prior to the date of passage and once as soon as practical after the date of
passage in a newspaper having general circulation in the City.
8
043
15-O-04
INTRODUCED by the Mayor and Council of the City of College Park, Maryland at a
regular meeting on the ________ day of _______________________ 2015.
ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the City of College Park, Maryland at a regular
meeting on the ________ day of ______________________________ 2015.
EFFECTIVE the ________ day of ________________________, 2015.
ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEGE PARK,
By: _____________________________ By: __________________________________
Janeen S. Miller, CMC, City Clerk Andrew M. Fellows, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
______________________________
Suellen M. Ferguson, City Attorney
9
044
15-G-89
(Placeholder)
045
15-G-91
046
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bill Gardiner, Assistant City Manager
Terry Schum, Planning Director
THROUGH: Joe Nagro, City Manager
DATE: August 7, 2015
SUBJECT: Current SHA Plan for the Reconstruction of Baltimore Avenue
ISSUE:
The SHA designs for the reconstruction of Baltimore Avenue between College Avenue and MD 193
are nearing completion. Right-of-Way acquisition is scheduled to begin in early 2016. The City,
County, and University of Maryland would like for SHA to make some modifications to the current
plan that would result in a safer environment for all users.
SUMMARY:
SHA has met with City, County, and University officials to review the plans in detail several times
since June 2015. These meetings have resulted in a better understanding of some of the design
challenges, as well as improvements to the intersection designs, pedestrian crosswalks, and access
management from businesses. SHA presented a summary of the current plans during the August 5,
2015 Worksession. City, County, and University staff have urged SHA to consider some additional
changes to create an appropriate landscape buffer for pedestrians and improved safety for cyclists.
These changes would further the project purpose (as stated in the SHA presentation), which is:
To improve safety for vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians that travel along the corridor,
manage access, and provide aesthetic improvements to establish US 1 as a gateway to the City
of College Park and the University of Maryland, College Park (UMD-CP).
An important area of concern is best shown by the images from the August 5, 2015 SHA presentation.
The photo immediately below shows the landscaped buffer and sidewalk adjacent to the Varsity and
the View. These developments were required to give SHA a 20-foot easement to create the
appropriate pedestrian facilities (new development on the east side is also required to give a 20-foot
easement). The landscaped buffer includes trees that can provide shade for pedestrians, the pedestrian
lighting, and the utility poles. Across the street, the existing sidewalk is four-feet wide and
immediately adjacent to the curb.
1
047
The current SHA plan for this section of Baltimore Avenue is shown below. The buffer in front of the
Varsity and the View is between two and three feet wide, too narrow for trees and too close to the curb
for pedestrian lights and utility poles. The sidewalk is only five-feet wide. On the east side, a five-foot
wide sidewalk is planned immediately against the curb, similar to the current situation (although a bike
lane will be adjacent to the curb). A five-foot sidewalk is adequate for two pedestrians to pass each
other without one person needing to step aside.
City, County, and University staff have expressed to SHA the importance for this area and others to
have a safety and landscaped buffer between the curb and the sidewalk, and to ensure the sidewalk
width is appropriate for the use. Similar concerns have been expressed regarding the current design for
no buffer between the sidewalk and road, and only a five-foot sidewalk near Jenkins Garage, Rita’s,
and Comfort Inn, and minimal buffers elsewhere.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council express its concerns with the planned pedestrian areas as noted above,
and the absence of a raised barrier for the bicycle lanes. Council is requested to authorize City staff to
work with the County, University of Maryland, elected officials, and SHA, as well as the business and
property owners along Baltimore Avenue, to create an appropriate buffered pedestrian zone with
adequate sidewalks, improved access management onto Baltimore Avenue, the appropriate location of
utilities, and improved buffers for bicyclists.
A proposed Council motion is attached.
2
048
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER ________________ 15-G-91
MOTION:
I move for Council to express its concerns with the current SHA plans, as presented on
August 5, 2015, for pedestrian and bicycle facilities for the Reconstruction of Baltimore
Avenue Project. Council authorizes City staff to work with the County, the University
of Maryland, elected officials, the business and property owners along Baltimore
Avenue, and SHA officials, to create an appropriate buffered pedestrian zone with
adequate sidewalks, improved access management onto Baltimore Avenue, the
appropriate location of utilities, and an improved buffer for bicyclists.
DISCUSSION:
The City, County, and University have been meeting and will continue to meet with
SHA on these design issues. This motion is to convey the Council’s concerns and
support for the positions identified above. Council may wish to review the plans in
greater detail and provide additional comments in the fall after the parties have met with
SHA.
3
049
15-G-90
050
Appointments to Boards and Committees 15-G-90
Mayor Fellows:
Kate Kennedy to the Advisory Planning Commission
Councilmember Wojahn:
Eric Hoffman to the Tree and Landscape Board
Christine O’Brien to the Tree and Landscape Board
Councilmember Kabir:
Pat Noone to the Animal Welfare Committee
Councilmember Stullich:
Bob Schnabel to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Committee
Councilmember Day:
Dave Dorsch to the Airport Authority for a three-year term
051
Get email alerts for College Park
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.