Planning Commission
Regular MeetingCookeville, TN · July 27, 2009
Minutes
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
JULY 27, 2009
The Cookeville Planning Commission met on Monday, July 27, 2009 at 5:30 p.m., in the
Council Chambers, 45 E. Broad Street, Cookeville, Tennessee.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jim Stafne, Tod Williams, Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser, Judy Jennings,
Chris Wakefield, Ryan Williams, Aaron Bernhardt, and Randy Dalton.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Dr. Angelo Volpe.
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: James Mills, Jayne Barns, and Ken Young.
STAFF MEMBERS ABSENT: Jim Shipley.
OTHERS PRESENT: See attached Record of Attendance.
CONSIDER FOR APPROVAL THE AGENDA AS SUBMITTED. Tod Williams made
the motion to approve the agenda as submitted. Aaron Bernhardt seconded the motion and the
motion carried unanimously. APPROVED.
CONSIDER FOR APPROVAL THE MINUTES OF JUNE 22 2009. Tod Williams made
the motion to approve the minutes of June 22, 2009. Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser seconded the
motion and the motion carried unanimously. APPROVED.
CONSIDER FOR ACTION AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING CODE PERTAINING
TO ELECTRONIC READER BOARDS IN THE CN (NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL) ZONE. REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE COOKEVILLE
PLANNING COMMISSION. James Mills stated that the Planning Department has
prepared for consideration amendments to the Zoning Code pertaining to electronic message
centers and reader boards in the CN, Neighborhood Commercial District.
The CN District is a mixed use zone intended for single and two-family residential dwellings
and limited office, business and retail uses. Non-residential structures are required to be
compatible with nearby residential structures in terms of scale and appearance. Freestanding
signs in the CN District are limited to 50 square feet in sign face area and to a height of 20
feet. Electronic message centers and reader boards are currently prohibited on freestanding
signs in the CN District. These are the most restrictive requirements for freestanding signs in
zoning districts allowing commercial uses. The more restrictive requirements are intended to
lessen the impact of non-residential uses on residential uses in the district.
Electronic message centers and reader boards are allowed in the CN, District as wall signs.
Section 207.6E (2) of the Zoning Code specifies that each commercial establishment is
allowed one (1) electronic message center or changeable copy sign as a wall sign provided
that such sign does not exceed 25 percent of the area of the face of the wall upon which the
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 2
JULY 27, 2009
sign is erected. In the opinion of the Planning Department, an electronic message center wall
sign occupying 25 percent of a wall could have a more significant impact on nearby
residential properties than a relatively small message center on a freestanding sign.
To address this situation the following amendments to Section 207, General Sign Regulations,
are recommended:
1. Amend Section 207.6E relative to wall signs in commercial districts to prohibit electronic
message centers and reader boards as wall signs in the CN District and to reduce the total
percentage of a wall that can be used for a sign in the CN District from 50 percent to 25
percent.
2. Amend Sections 207.6D (13) and (14) relative to freestanding signs in commercial
districts to allow as uses permitted on appeal in the CN District electronic message centers
and reader boards attached to freestanding sign subject to the following conditions:
a. The freestanding sign on which the electronic message center or reader board is to be
attached is located on a street of at least minor collector status.
b. The freestanding sign on which the electronic message center or reader board is to be
attached shall not be located closer than 50 feet from any single or two-family
residential structure located on contiguous property. The distance shall be measure
from the edge of the sign face closest to a wall of the residential structure.
c. The total sign face area of the freestanding sign and the attached electronic message
center/reader board shall not exceed 50 square feet.
d. Each message displayed on an electronic message center shall be static or depicted for
a minimum of six (6) seconds. The continuous scrolling of messages is prohibited.
e. Internal lighting of the electronic message centers shall be restricted to a black
background with white or yellow text.
3. Amend Section 207.6D (10) relative to freestanding signs in the CN District to specify
that the support structures of such signs shall be constructed of the same or compatible
materials as the principal structure.
Staff recommended approval of the amendments.
Kevin McBroom of Martin Signs started that the white lettering is the most intense color at
11,000 ceds, the colors red & amber are the same intensity at 5,000 ceds, and that the color
yellow is being discontinued. He requested that the Board not mandate the color of the
lettering.
James Mills stated that the Board could change the wording to amber. Mr. Mills added that
the City of Cookeville does not have the equipment to measure the intensity of the colors in
the reader board.
There was some discussion by the Board to take out 2.e. ((Internal lighting of the electronic
message centers shall be restricted to a black background with white or yellow text.) and to
bring back at next month’s meeting more information on the colors and on limiting the times
that the signs can be on, so that they will not burn all night in the CN zone.
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 3
JULY 27, 2009
Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser made the motion to approve the amendments to the zoning code
pertaining to electronic reader boards in the CN zone with the deletion of 2.e. (Internal
lighting of the electronic message centers shall be restricted to a black background with white
or yellow text.) Ryan Williams seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously.
APPROVED AMENDMENTS.
CONSIDER FOR ACTION REZONING 1200 MIRACLE ROAD (TAX MAP # 66-
73.05 & 73.06 FROM RS15 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO CG (GENERAL
COMMERCIAL). REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE RIVER COMMUNITY
CHURCH. James Mills stated that Mr. David Burnett, on behalf of River Community
Church, has submitted a request to rezone properties located on Miracle Road from RS-15,
Single Family Residential to CG, General Commercial.
The properties proposed for rezoning are identified as Parcels 73.05 and 73.06 on Tax Map 66
and consist of approximately 23.25 acres, combined. The church is currently located on
Parcel 73.05 and has long range plans for expanding onto Parcel 73.06.
The parcels are contiguous with RS-15 zoning to the north, south and west and with RS-15
and CG zoning to the east. Adequate utilities are available to the properties. Miracle Road,
which provides access to the properties, is classified as a local street. The street and utilities
were constructed by the church as a part of the River Community Church Subdivision in
2006. Miracle Road is a dead-end street extending approximately 2,020 off Green Gate Lane.
Green Gate Lane is also a dead-end street extending from South Willow Avenue
approximately 1,800 feet to Miracle Road. A variance was approved by the Planning
Commission as a part of the subdivision approval process to allow the street to exceed the
maximum permitted length of a dead-end street (1,200 feet).
The petitioner indicates in the rezoning application that the properties will continue to be used
for church purposes and for its future expansion. In discussions with the Planning
Department Mr. Burnett indicated that the current zoning limited the future plans for the
church. The primary concerns discussed included limitations on sanctuary size and sign size
and height.
Churches are permitted uses in the RS-15 District provided certain conditions are met. These
conditions include a minimum acreage requirement of two (2) acres for the first 250
sanctuary/auditorium seats and one (1) additional acre per every additional 50 seats. Based on
this requirement and the acreage available to the church (23 acres), the church could have a
total sanctuary capacity of 1,300 seats under the current zoning. Churches are also permitted
in the CG District but are not subject to the acreage requirements. In residential districts,
including the RS-15 District, freestanding church signs are limited to a maximum of 50 or 100
square feet in sign face area depending on the amount of street frontage. In commercial
districts, including the CG District, permitted uses can have signs up to 250 square feet in sign
face area. In addition, in the CG District on properties located within 750 feet of the right-of-
way of Interstate 40, signs can be erected to the height of 100 feet.
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 4
JULY 27, 2009
There are significant concerns regarding the proposed rezoning to CG due to the lack of
adequate access if the subject properties were to be developed for commercial purposes.
Under the current RS-15 zoning the density of development and the amount of traffic on the
dead-end street can be somewhat controlled. Development of the existing parcels, without
resubdivision, is generally limited to a few single family residential structures. Mr. Burnett
has informed the Planning Department that the church’s by-laws prohibit the properties from
being used for anything other than church or church related uses; however, he also has
indicated that there are no deed restrictions on the properties restricting their use should they
be sold.
The Comprehensive Future Land Use Plan depicts the subject properties as being best suited
for residential development. The eastern portion of the property is contiguous with an area
depicted as potentially suitable for commercial development. This commercial development
would be contingent upon the provision of adequate access. The Planning Commission in its
recent update of the Major Street Plan component of the revised Comprehensive Plan has
identified the extension of a street from Bunker Hill Road west to Miracle Road. While the
update of the Future Land Use Plan has not been finalized it is anticipated by the Planning
Department that the subject properties and others along the proposed street would be
identified as being best suited for commercial use. This is based on the assumption that at
some point in the future adequate access from the proposed connector street will be provided.
Under the current zoning there are limitations on the ability of the church to expand. Both
parcels proposed for rezoning were created as a part of a subdivision approved by the
Planning Commission. The subdivision was developed by the church specifically for the
construction of the church. While there are no assurances that the properties will always be
utilized for church purposes, based upon the investment of the church it is likely these
properties will be used for such purposes for the foreseeable future.
Staff recommended approval of the rezoning request.
Steve Tiebout, Pastor of The River Community Church, stated that they built their current
church building on faith and moved in two years ago and that they were able to build the
facility debt free. Due to the rapid growth of the Church, they currently have two services at
full capacity. They would like to construct a larger facility in stages for future growth but
they are unable to expand under the current zoning.
Randy Dalton made the motion to approve the rezoning request from RS-15 (Single Family
Residential) to CG (General Commercial). Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser seconded the motion and
the motion carried unanimously. APPROVED REZONING FROM RS15 TO CG.
CONSIDER FOR ACTION REZONING 1629 MCCULLEY ROAD FROM RS20
(SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO RS5 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL).
REQUEST SUBMITTED BY TIM HUDDLESTON. James Mills stated that Mr. Tim
Huddleston has submitted a request to rezone his property located at 1629 McCulley Road
from RS-20, Single Family Residential to RS-5, Single Family Residential.
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 5
JULY 27, 2009
The property proposed for rezoning is identified as Parcel 49.00 on Tax Map 52 and,
according to the records of the Putnam County Property Assessor, consists of approximately
16.6 acres. The parcel is contiguous with RS-20 zoning on all sides. When the subject
property was annexed in 2001 it was zoned as R-1, Single Family Residential. The minimum
lot size requirement in the R-1 District was 10,000 square feet. In 2002, as a part of the
adoption of the new Zoning Code and Map, the zoning of the subject property was changed to
RS-20. The minimum lot size requirement of the RS-20 District is 20,000 square feet. The
RS-20 District was primarily created to establish a zone for residential properties without
access to public sewer.
The primary difference between the RS-20 and RS-5 Districts is minimum lot size. Permitted
uses in both districts are the same with single family detached structures being the only form
of residential dwellings allowed. The minimum lot size requirement in the RS-20 District is
20,000 square feet while in the RS-5 District the minimum is 5,000 square feet. There are
also significant differences in setback requirements with the RS-20 requiring front setbacks of
30 feet, rear setbacks of 30 feet and side setbacks of 10 feet and the RS-5 requiring front
setbacks of 20 feet, rear setbacks of 15 feet and side setbacks of 7.5 feet.
The petitioner indicates in the rezoning application that he intends to subdivide the property.
Excluding the land area necessary for street, sidewalk and utility construction, under the
current zoning it is estimated that approximately 25 lots could be developed on the property
and under the proposed zoning approximately 75 lots could be developed. For example, in
Phase 1 of the Reserve at the County Club, which is zoned as RS-5 and consists of slightly
less than 25 acres, 109 lots were developed or approximately 4.4 lots per acre.
The Comprehensive Future Land Use Plan depicts the subject property as being best suited
for low density residential development. Low density residential development is defined as
up to 4 dwelling units per acre. As noted previously the RS-20 District was created for
residential properties without access to sewer. The majority of the properties annexed since
2000 are zoned as RS-20. In fact 6,800 acres, or one-third of city’s total land area, are zoned
as RS-20 and this is primarily due to the lack of sewer. It has always been anticipated that as
sewer is extended higher density zoning would be considered for the undeveloped and under
developed areas zoned as RS-20. There have so far been few rezoning proposals of RS-20
properties because very little sewer has been extended to these areas. When the appropriate
infrastructure becomes available, a failure to consider higher density zoning for the
undeveloped portions of these nearly 7,000 acres would have a major impact on the ability of
the city to provide for its future land use needs.
In addition to agreement with the city’s future land use plans, several other factors should be
examined in the consideration of this or any other rezoning request. These include the impact
and compatibility of the proposed uses with the existing uses on adjacent properties, the
availability of sufficient utilities, the adequacy of the existing street system, and the physical
characteristics of the properties.
The subject property is primarily contiguous with single family residential development to the
east and south. An undeveloped tract approximately 15 acres in size is contiguous to the
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 6
JULY 27, 2009
west. There is one (1) existing single-family currently located on McCulley Road between
Grandveiw Drive and Rockwell Drive. A church, bible college and commercial nursery are
located on the north side of McCulley Road. The surrounding residential neighborhood
consists primarily of older, well maintained homes that are mostly owner occupied.
As previously noted the permitted uses in the RS-20 and RS-5 districts are the same and
therefore in terms of land use the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the adjacent
existing residential uses. According to the records of the Putnam County Property Assessor,
the lot sizes of the 20 contiguous parcels range from approximately 93,525 square feet to
13,606 square feet. Of these 20 parcels, 12 consist of less than 20,000 square feet. Gauging
the impact of a higher density single family development on the property values of adjacent
lower density single family development is difficult. Smaller residential lot size does not
necessarily result in lower priced homes or even homes of smaller square footage. According
to the records of the Putnam County Property Assessor, the average appraised value of the 38
single family structures located between Rockwell Drive and Grandview Drive north of
Springboro Road is $91,476 (see enclosed). Property tax appraisals are often less than actual
market values and the actual average market value of these homes is probably closer to
$125,000 to $150,000.
The Cookeville Water Department indicates that public water, for both domestic and fire
protection purposes, is available to the subject property and is sufficient to serve the property
at the density allowed under RS-5 zoning. Water is available to the property from an existing
6 inch line located on McCulley Road. The developer would be responsible for all costs
associated with improvements necessary for the development of the property.
Access to public sewer is a primary requirement for residential developments at densities of
less than 20,000 square feet per dwelling unit. Gravity sewer service is currently not available
to the subject property. The Cookeville Water Department, however, has met with the
petitioner regarding the installation of a pumping station and has indicated that it would
accept the pumping station and collection system if the system is designed and installed per
their specifications. The developer would be responsible for all costs associated with
improvements necessary for the development of the property. It should be noted that should
the property be rezoned for higher density development it could not be developed at the
higher density unless sewer is made available.
The subject property is accessed by McCulley Road, a local residential street in good
condition with an average pavement width of 16 feet. The minimum acceptable pavement
width for streets with two-way traffic is 18 feet to 20 feet depending on the design of the
street. Any significant subdivision of the property, whether it is zoned as RS-20 or RS-5, will
require that the developer improve the width of McCulley Road. Access to McCulley Road
from East Spring Street is provided by Grandview Drive and Whitson Chapel Road. These
streets are currently not signalized at their intersections with East Spring Street. Grandview
Drive is a local residential street in good condition with an average pavement width of 19 feet.
Whitson Chapel Road is a minor collector street connecting East Spring Street with Buck
Mountain Road. It is in good condition with an average pavement width of 18 feet.
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 7
JULY 27, 2009
Assuming an average daily trip generation of seven (7) vehicle trips per day, a development
of 75 dwelling units can be projected to produce 525 vehicle trips per day. An average daily
traffic count on McCulley Road has not been determined but is estimated to be less than 100
vehicles per day. Traffic to and from McCulley Road would be dispersed onto Grandview
Drive and Whitson Chapel Road. The 2008 average daily traffic on Whitson Chapel Road at
its intersection with East Spring Street was 790. According to the Institute of Traffic
Engineers, local streets of appropriate widths with maximum speed limits of 35 MPH or less,
and lacking any significant design issues, generally can adequately handle average daily
traffic counts of up to 2,000 vehicles. While the existing streets may be able to absorb the
anticipated traffic increase, an additional 500 plus vehicle trips per day is significant.
The topography of the subject property can be generally described as level. An examination
of the city’s GIS sinkhole data indicates that small portions of sinkhole retention areas may
encroach on the property. Based on the GIS data the retention areas would not appear to have
a major impact on the development of the property. The impact of the retention areas and
other physical factors affecting the property, including drainage, would be analyzed and
addressed when and if the property is developed.
The most significant physical characteristic of the property affecting its development is street
frontage. Based on the information available to the Planning Department the property only
has frontage on McCulley Road at a width of approximately 160 feet. The Cookeville
Subdivision Regulations specify that a minimum of two access points be provided for single
family developments of more than 20 lots and that the maximum street length of a dead-end
street is 1,200 feet. The minimum separation of intersections of local streets on local streets
should be the width of one (1) block or a minimum of two (2) lots. Assuming that a minimum
right-of-way of 45 feet would be provided in the development of the property, the maximum
street intersection separation at McCulley Road that could be provided would be 70 feet,
which would not be sufficient. While there are several single family residential developments
located within the city with only one access point containing a great deal more than 20 lots,
most were developed prior to the adoption of the current Subdivision Regulations in 2000. It
should be noted that the Planning Commission has granted variances from the maximum
street length and number of lots in subdivisions since 2000; however, the Planning
Department is not aware of any variances that have allowed the number of lots that could
potentially be developed on the subject property should it be rezoned to RS-5.
In summation, the Planning Department is of the opinion that the subject property is not
appropriate for RS-5 zoning. This opinion is based primarily on the property’s existing street
frontage, which prohibits the provision of adequate access for the density of development
allowed under RS-5. It is also based on the impact of the potential traffic increase on the
existing residential streets that would result from a development at the density allowed under
RS-5 zoning. The Planning Department, however, is of the opinion that, with the provision of
sewer, the subject property is appropriate for the higher density single family residential
zoning of RS-10. The RS-10 zone is also for single family residential development and has a
minimum lot size requirement of 10,000 square feet. The setback requirements in the district
are 25 feet for front yards, 20 feet for rear yards, and 10 feet for side yards. The lot size
requirement of the RS-10 district is the generally the minimum necessary to justify the cost of
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 8
JULY 27, 2009
the extension of public sewer and provide lots affordable to the majority of potential home
buyers. Most of the subdivisions in the city with public sewer are zoned as RS-10 including
Old Kentucky Place, Windrowe, Village Green, Tanglewood and many others. Additionally,
RS-10 zoning for the subject property would be in conformity with the Future Land Use Plan.
Staff recommended denial of the request for rezoning to RS-5, but approval of rezoning the
property to RS-10, Single Family Residential.
Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser stated that the street system in the area was substandard and he was
concerned about the overload on the current streets.
Tim Huddleston stated that as the developer he would improve McCulley according to the
city standards. Mr. Huddleston added that he met with the Director of Water Quality Control
concerning the issue of gravity sewer and found out that it was not accessible to this property,
but he was told that he could install at his own expense a pumping station to this area. Tim
Huddleston also stated that he asked the Director of Planning which came first the rezoning or
the subdivision plat and he was advised that the rezoning request would come first
Mr. Huddleston stated that the market demand for starter homes in Cookeville is in the
$150,000 price range. The homes & lots will sell for between $150,000 to $170,000. The
study of the sinkhole will be addressed during the subdivision plat process. He added that the
Planning Commission has a provision that allows them to grant a waiver to allow one access
instead of two (2) accesses based on characteristics of the site and adjacent streets.
Dean Moore, 310 Whitson Chapel Road; Paul Bonner, 3210 Buck Mountain Road; Richard
Charles, 355 Whitson Chapel Road; Evelyn Handy, 1647 McCulley Road; Tim Smith, 501
Scenic Lane; and David Patterson, 500 Grandview Drive, spoke in opposition to rezoning the
property from RS20 to RS5. Some of their concerns were too much density, affect on property
values, additional traffic, McCulley Road too narrow, sinkhole study, and sewer availability.
Tim Huddleston suggested that if the City is not going to rezone any more property less than
RS20, then they might want to look at rezoning everything as PRD (Planned Residential
Development).
James Mills reiterated that the RS20 zoning was placed in areas all over Cookeville that did
not have access to sewer. It was the intent of the City to consider changing the zoning from
RS20 when sewer became available. If a developer has to put in sewer at his own expense
and develop the property under RS20 zoning, then the lots would be so expensive that the
average homeowner would not be able to afford the lots. Sinkhole studies, sewer availability,
improvements to existing roads are all reviewed when the property is developed.
Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser stated that he wanted to the City to grow in an orderly manner and he
didn’t want to rezone property with inadequate infrastructure.
Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser made the motion to deny rezoning 1629 McCulley Road from RS20 to
RS5. Judy Jennings seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously. DENIED.
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 9
JULY 27, 2009
Jim Stafne stated that the petitioner has the right to appeal the decision of the Planning
Commission to the City Council.
HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER FOR ACTION ANNEXATION OF
FREEHILL ROAD – NORTH WASHINGTON AVENUE AREA AND PLAN OF
SERVICES FOR SAME. REQUEST SUBMITTED BY STAFF. James Mills stated that
the Planning Department has completed a feasibility study on the annexation of
approximately 90 acres of property located north of the current corporate limits between
Freehill Road and North Washington Avenue. The study was initiated following the receipt
of individual requests for annexation from property owners in the area. The area proposed for
annexation is located entirely within the City of Cookeville Urban Growth Boundary.
Property owners in the proposed annexation area have been notified by mail and provided an
information package on the proposed annexation.
A Plan of Services for the proposed annexation area has also been prepared. It should be
reviewed on a point by point basis. A written report from the Planning Commission to the
City Council regarding the Plan of Services is required.
The study area consists of 49 parcels in their entirety and a portion of one (1) other. Located
on 38 of these 50 parcels are 65 residential housing units, of which 56 are occupied. The
estimated population of the area is 123 persons. There are approximately 0.53 miles of streets
in the area, with approximately 0.37 miles of these streets being in less than good condition.
At the present time, the proposed annexation area can be generally characterized as mixed
density residential. It has been identified in the Cookeville Future Land Use Plan as an area
primarily best suited for low density and mixed density residential development. The area has
a limited amount of undeveloped land. Topographically the area can be described as level to
gently rolling.
Water service to the entire proposed annexation area is currently provided by the City of
Cookeville. Approximately $76,000 in improvements will be necessary to bring the area up
to the same standards as in the corporate limits. While city sewer lines are already located in
a portion of the annexation property owners in the area are not able to connect to the system
because they are located outside the city. An estimated $380,000 in improvements will be
necessary to provide public sewer service to the entire area. Natural gas is available to a
portion of the area. The 18 current gas customers would have their rates reduced to the inside
city rate within approximately 60 days following annexation. Improvements costing
approximately $11,400 will be necessary to serve the entire area. It is anticipated that electric
service will continue to be provided by the Upper Cumberland Electric Membership
Cooperative unless the co-op agrees to cede the area to the City of Cookeville.
Approximately 16 street lights will be installed. The area is located within the 5 mile fire
service boundary of the city’s existing fire station located on North Washington Avenue.
Residents of the area proposed for annexation would receive numerous benefits as a result of
annexation. These include improved police and fire protection, reduction of ISO fire
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 10
JULY 27, 2009
insurance rating from Class 9 to Class 2 which can result in a savings on homeowners
insurance of up to 20 percent, reduction of water rates by over 30 percent, zoning protection,
street lighting, and weekly garbage pick up. Natural gas customers would received the inside
city rate, which is 25 percent less than the outside city rate.
Property owners would be required to pay city property tax. The current city property tax rate
is $0.87 per $100 of assessed value. Based on current tax appraisals the average annual city
property tax for a homeowner in the area would $149.10. Should this area be annexed in
2009, property owners would not be required to pay city property tax until 2010.
The estimated cost for the provision of all services to the proposed annexation area is
$484,000 of which the provision of sewer service is $380,000. The provision of sewer to the
annexation area is depicted on the Master Sewer Plan of the Department of Water Quality
Controls. The estimated annual revenue to the city from property and state shared taxes is
$21,700.
Staff recommended approval of Plan of Services and approval of annexation with
recommendation to City Council for RS-20, Single Family Residential Zoning and CL, Local
Commercial Zoning.
A petition of 17 names was presented to the Planning Commission at the meeting in
opposition to the annexation.
Several of the residents spoke in opposition: Donna Haynes, 495 Dogwood Circle; David
Morris, 2199 Freehill Road; Debbie Hannah & Eldon Hannah 2448 Hilham Road. Some of
their concerns were pigs, farming, new fence codes, building codes, and trailers.
Mr. Mills responded to their concerns.
Chris Wakefield made the motion to approve the Annexation area. Ryan Williams seconded
the motion. Votes: Jim Stafne-nay, Tod Williams-aye, Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser-nay, Judy
Jennings-nay, Chris Wakefield-aye, Ryan Williams-aye, Aaron Bernhardt-aye, and Randy
Dalton-aye. Motion carried. APPROVED.
CONSIDER FOR ACTION FINAL PLAT OF THE CUMBERLANDS OF
COOKEVILLE, A CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON THE
CORNER OF EAST SPRING STREET AND SOUTH MAPLE AVENUE. REQUEST
SUBMITTED BY SLADE STROUD. James Mills stated that Mr. Slade Stroud has
submitted for approval a Final Plat of The Cumberlands of Cookeville, a Condominium
Development, located at the southeast corner of North Maple Avenue and East Spring Street.
No preliminary plat was required for this development because it is classified as a minor plat
and no new public infrastructure is proposed or needed.
The property proposed for subdivision is identified on Tax Map 53F Group K as Parcel 5.00
and consists of approximately .697 acres. The property is zoned as CL (Local Commercial)
and the proposed use is equally split between residential and commercial. The four lower
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 11
JULY 27, 2009
units front East Spring Street and are for commercial use only. The upper four units are
addressed off North Maple Avenue and are for residential use only. The property is more than
25’ from the center line of the roads, and sidewalks abut both of the existing public streets.
The front setbacks along East Spring Street and North Maple Avenue are properly shown as
50’ and 30’ respectively, and the sides and rear of the property are 10’. The rear of the
property contains a public alley easement.
The new condos will be served by the existing water line located in the right-of-way of North
Maple Avenue and all units have individual meters. Three fire hydrants are within 290 feet of
the property. Sewer service will be provided from the sewer main located within the right-of-
way of East Spring Street. The Public Works Department has determined that all units will be
served by individual waste containers rather than dumpsters. The plat further depicts that the
required parking spaces have been provided. In addition, the parking area contains a detention
pond that has been designed and constructed with the approval of the Public Works
Department. No portion of the lot is in a Special Flood Hazard Area as noted on the plat. All
of the property and infrastructure is to remain private and repair and maintenance of the
common elements are to be covered under a homeowner’s association agreement that is to be
provided prior to plat recordation.
Staff recommended conditional final plat approval subject to the following: (1) Submission
of the recorded homeowner’s association agreement, and (2) Completion of corrections or
additions to the plat as determined necessary by the Planning Department and/or other
appropriate city departments
Ryan Williams made the motion to grant conditional final plat approval subject to staff’s
recommendation. Randy Dalton seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously.
CONDITIONAL FINAL PLAT APPROVAL.
Chris Wakefield made the motion to take the following item for study. Randy Dalton
seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously. STUDY ITEM.
(1) CONSIDER FOR STUDY AMENDMENT TO SECTION 218, PRD (PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT), REDUCING THE MINIMUM SIZE
REQUIREMENT IN SECTION 218.5. REQUEST SUBMITTED BY STAFF.
STAFF REPORTS:
(1) MINOR PLAT APPROVALS:
• THE BROWNSTONES SUBDIVISION, 2 LOTS LOCATED ON STOUT AND
BUNKERHILL ROAD – JUSTIN CUMBY.
• FOREST HILLS ESTATES REDIVISION OF LOTS 162 & 163, 2 LOTS LOCATED
ON THE CORNER OF LONE OAK AND CONTRABAND LANE – JAMES M.
ALLEN.
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 12
JULY 27, 2009
ADJOURNMENT: 7:55 P.M.
SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL SUBMITTED FOR RECORDING
____________________________ _________________________________
JAYNE BARNS CPS JIM STAFNE, CHAIRMAN
PLANNING ASSISTANT COOKEVILLE PLANNING
COMMISSION
Agenda
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
JULY 27, 2009
The Cookeville Planning Commission met on Monday, July 27, 2009 at 5:30 p.m., in the
Council Chambers, 45 E. Broad Street, Cookeville, Tennessee.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jim Stafne, Tod Williams, Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser, Judy Jennings,
Chris Wakefield, Ryan Williams, Aaron Bernhardt, and Randy Dalton.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Dr. Angelo Volpe.
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: James Mills, Jayne Barns, and Ken Young.
STAFF MEMBERS ABSENT: Jim Shipley.
OTHERS PRESENT: See attached Record of Attendance.
CONSIDER FOR APPROVAL THE AGENDA AS SUBMITTED. Tod Williams made
the motion to approve the agenda as submitted. Aaron Bernhardt seconded the motion and the
motion carried unanimously. APPROVED.
CONSIDER FOR APPROVAL THE MINUTES OF JUNE 22 2009. Tod Williams made
the motion to approve the minutes of June 22, 2009. Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser seconded the
motion and the motion carried unanimously. APPROVED.
CONSIDER FOR ACTION AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING CODE PERTAINING
TO ELECTRONIC READER BOARDS IN THE CN (NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL) ZONE. REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE COOKEVILLE
PLANNING COMMISSION. James Mills stated that the Planning Department has
prepared for consideration amendments to the Zoning Code pertaining to electronic message
centers and reader boards in the CN, Neighborhood Commercial District.
The CN District is a mixed use zone intended for single and two-family residential dwellings
and limited office, business and retail uses. Non-residential structures are required to be
compatible with nearby residential structures in terms of scale and appearance. Freestanding
signs in the CN District are limited to 50 square feet in sign face area and to a height of 20
feet. Electronic message centers and reader boards are currently prohibited on freestanding
signs in the CN District. These are the most restrictive requirements for freestanding signs in
zoning districts allowing commercial uses. The more restrictive requirements are intended to
lessen the impact of non-residential uses on residential uses in the district.
Electronic message centers and reader boards are allowed in the CN, District as wall signs.
Section 207.6E (2) of the Zoning Code specifies that each commercial establishment is
allowed one (1) electronic message center or changeable copy sign as a wall sign provided
that such sign does not exceed 25 percent of the area of the face of the wall upon which the
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 2
JULY 27, 2009
sign is erected. In the opinion of the Planning Department, an electronic message center wall
sign occupying 25 percent of a wall could have a more significant impact on nearby
residential properties than a relatively small message center on a freestanding sign.
To address this situation the following amendments to Section 207, General Sign Regulations,
are recommended:
1. Amend Section 207.6E relative to wall signs in commercial districts to prohibit electronic
message centers and reader boards as wall signs in the CN District and to reduce the total
percentage of a wall that can be used for a sign in the CN District from 50 percent to 25
percent.
2. Amend Sections 207.6D (13) and (14) relative to freestanding signs in commercial
districts to allow as uses permitted on appeal in the CN District electronic message centers
and reader boards attached to freestanding sign subject to the following conditions:
a. The freestanding sign on which the electronic message center or reader board is to be
attached is located on a street of at least minor collector status.
b. The freestanding sign on which the electronic message center or reader board is to be
attached shall not be located closer than 50 feet from any single or two-family
residential structure located on contiguous property. The distance shall be measure
from the edge of the sign face closest to a wall of the residential structure.
c. The total sign face area of the freestanding sign and the attached electronic message
center/reader board shall not exceed 50 square feet.
d. Each message displayed on an electronic message center shall be static or depicted for
a minimum of six (6) seconds. The continuous scrolling of messages is prohibited.
e. Internal lighting of the electronic message centers shall be restricted to a black
background with white or yellow text.
3. Amend Section 207.6D (10) relative to freestanding signs in the CN District to specify
that the support structures of such signs shall be constructed of the same or compatible
materials as the principal structure.
Staff recommended approval of the amendments.
Kevin McBroom of Martin Signs started that the white lettering is the most intense color at
11,000 ceds, the colors red & amber are the same intensity at 5,000 ceds, and that the color
yellow is being discontinued. He requested that the Board not mandate the color of the
lettering.
James Mills stated that the Board could change the wording to amber. Mr. Mills added that
the City of Cookeville does not have the equipment to measure the intensity of the colors in
the reader board.
There was some discussion by the Board to take out 2.e. ((Internal lighting of the electronic
message centers shall be restricted to a black background with white or yellow text.) and to
bring back at next month’s meeting more information on the colors and on limiting the times
that the signs can be on, so that they will not burn all night in the CN zone.
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 3
JULY 27, 2009
Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser made the motion to approve the amendments to the zoning code
pertaining to electronic reader boards in the CN zone with the deletion of 2.e. (Internal
lighting of the electronic message centers shall be restricted to a black background with white
or yellow text.) Ryan Williams seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously.
APPROVED AMENDMENTS.
CONSIDER FOR ACTION REZONING 1200 MIRACLE ROAD (TAX MAP # 66-
73.05 & 73.06 FROM RS15 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO CG (GENERAL
COMMERCIAL). REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE RIVER COMMUNITY
CHURCH. James Mills stated that Mr. David Burnett, on behalf of River Community
Church, has submitted a request to rezone properties located on Miracle Road from RS-15,
Single Family Residential to CG, General Commercial.
The properties proposed for rezoning are identified as Parcels 73.05 and 73.06 on Tax Map 66
and consist of approximately 23.25 acres, combined. The church is currently located on
Parcel 73.05 and has long range plans for expanding onto Parcel 73.06.
The parcels are contiguous with RS-15 zoning to the north, south and west and with RS-15
and CG zoning to the east. Adequate utilities are available to the properties. Miracle Road,
which provides access to the properties, is classified as a local street. The street and utilities
were constructed by the church as a part of the River Community Church Subdivision in
2006. Miracle Road is a dead-end street extending approximately 2,020 off Green Gate Lane.
Green Gate Lane is also a dead-end street extending from South Willow Avenue
approximately 1,800 feet to Miracle Road. A variance was approved by the Planning
Commission as a part of the subdivision approval process to allow the street to exceed the
maximum permitted length of a dead-end street (1,200 feet).
The petitioner indicates in the rezoning application that the properties will continue to be used
for church purposes and for its future expansion. In discussions with the Planning
Department Mr. Burnett indicated that the current zoning limited the future plans for the
church. The primary concerns discussed included limitations on sanctuary size and sign size
and height.
Churches are permitted uses in the RS-15 District provided certain conditions are met. These
conditions include a minimum acreage requirement of two (2) acres for the first 250
sanctuary/auditorium seats and one (1) additional acre per every additional 50 seats. Based on
this requirement and the acreage available to the church (23 acres), the church could have a
total sanctuary capacity of 1,300 seats under the current zoning. Churches are also permitted
in the CG District but are not subject to the acreage requirements. In residential districts,
including the RS-15 District, freestanding church signs are limited to a maximum of 50 or 100
square feet in sign face area depending on the amount of street frontage. In commercial
districts, including the CG District, permitted uses can have signs up to 250 square feet in sign
face area. In addition, in the CG District on properties located within 750 feet of the right-of-
way of Interstate 40, signs can be erected to the height of 100 feet.
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 4
JULY 27, 2009
There are significant concerns regarding the proposed rezoning to CG due to the lack of
adequate access if the subject properties were to be developed for commercial purposes.
Under the current RS-15 zoning the density of development and the amount of traffic on the
dead-end street can be somewhat controlled. Development of the existing parcels, without
resubdivision, is generally limited to a few single family residential structures. Mr. Burnett
has informed the Planning Department that the church’s by-laws prohibit the properties from
being used for anything other than church or church related uses; however, he also has
indicated that there are no deed restrictions on the properties restricting their use should they
be sold.
The Comprehensive Future Land Use Plan depicts the subject properties as being best suited
for residential development. The eastern portion of the property is contiguous with an area
depicted as potentially suitable for commercial development. This commercial development
would be contingent upon the provision of adequate access. The Planning Commission in its
recent update of the Major Street Plan component of the revised Comprehensive Plan has
identified the extension of a street from Bunker Hill Road west to Miracle Road. While the
update of the Future Land Use Plan has not been finalized it is anticipated by the Planning
Department that the subject properties and others along the proposed street would be
identified as being best suited for commercial use. This is based on the assumption that at
some point in the future adequate access from the proposed connector street will be provided.
Under the current zoning there are limitations on the ability of the church to expand. Both
parcels proposed for rezoning were created as a part of a subdivision approved by the
Planning Commission. The subdivision was developed by the church specifically for the
construction of the church. While there are no assurances that the properties will always be
utilized for church purposes, based upon the investment of the church it is likely these
properties will be used for such purposes for the foreseeable future.
Staff recommended approval of the rezoning request.
Steve Tiebout, Pastor of The River Community Church, stated that they built their current
church building on faith and moved in two years ago and that they were able to build the
facility debt free. Due to the rapid growth of the Church, they currently have two services at
full capacity. They would like to construct a larger facility in stages for future growth but
they are unable to expand under the current zoning.
Randy Dalton made the motion to approve the rezoning request from RS-15 (Single Family
Residential) to CG (General Commercial). Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser seconded the motion and
the motion carried unanimously. APPROVED REZONING FROM RS15 TO CG.
CONSIDER FOR ACTION REZONING 1629 MCCULLEY ROAD FROM RS20
(SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO RS5 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL).
REQUEST SUBMITTED BY TIM HUDDLESTON. James Mills stated that Mr. Tim
Huddleston has submitted a request to rezone his property located at 1629 McCulley Road
from RS-20, Single Family Residential to RS-5, Single Family Residential.
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 5
JULY 27, 2009
The property proposed for rezoning is identified as Parcel 49.00 on Tax Map 52 and,
according to the records of the Putnam County Property Assessor, consists of approximately
16.6 acres. The parcel is contiguous with RS-20 zoning on all sides. When the subject
property was annexed in 2001 it was zoned as R-1, Single Family Residential. The minimum
lot size requirement in the R-1 District was 10,000 square feet. In 2002, as a part of the
adoption of the new Zoning Code and Map, the zoning of the subject property was changed to
RS-20. The minimum lot size requirement of the RS-20 District is 20,000 square feet. The
RS-20 District was primarily created to establish a zone for residential properties without
access to public sewer.
The primary difference between the RS-20 and RS-5 Districts is minimum lot size. Permitted
uses in both districts are the same with single family detached structures being the only form
of residential dwellings allowed. The minimum lot size requirement in the RS-20 District is
20,000 square feet while in the RS-5 District the minimum is 5,000 square feet. There are
also significant differences in setback requirements with the RS-20 requiring front setbacks of
30 feet, rear setbacks of 30 feet and side setbacks of 10 feet and the RS-5 requiring front
setbacks of 20 feet, rear setbacks of 15 feet and side setbacks of 7.5 feet.
The petitioner indicates in the rezoning application that he intends to subdivide the property.
Excluding the land area necessary for street, sidewalk and utility construction, under the
current zoning it is estimated that approximately 25 lots could be developed on the property
and under the proposed zoning approximately 75 lots could be developed. For example, in
Phase 1 of the Reserve at the County Club, which is zoned as RS-5 and consists of slightly
less than 25 acres, 109 lots were developed or approximately 4.4 lots per acre.
The Comprehensive Future Land Use Plan depicts the subject property as being best suited
for low density residential development. Low density residential development is defined as
up to 4 dwelling units per acre. As noted previously the RS-20 District was created for
residential properties without access to sewer. The majority of the properties annexed since
2000 are zoned as RS-20. In fact 6,800 acres, or one-third of city’s total land area, are zoned
as RS-20 and this is primarily due to the lack of sewer. It has always been anticipated that as
sewer is extended higher density zoning would be considered for the undeveloped and under
developed areas zoned as RS-20. There have so far been few rezoning proposals of RS-20
properties because very little sewer has been extended to these areas. When the appropriate
infrastructure becomes available, a failure to consider higher density zoning for the
undeveloped portions of these nearly 7,000 acres would have a major impact on the ability of
the city to provide for its future land use needs.
In addition to agreement with the city’s future land use plans, several other factors should be
examined in the consideration of this or any other rezoning request. These include the impact
and compatibility of the proposed uses with the existing uses on adjacent properties, the
availability of sufficient utilities, the adequacy of the existing street system, and the physical
characteristics of the properties.
The subject property is primarily contiguous with single family residential development to the
east and south. An undeveloped tract approximately 15 acres in size is contiguous to the
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 6
JULY 27, 2009
west. There is one (1) existing single-family currently located on McCulley Road between
Grandveiw Drive and Rockwell Drive. A church, bible college and commercial nursery are
located on the north side of McCulley Road. The surrounding residential neighborhood
consists primarily of older, well maintained homes that are mostly owner occupied.
As previously noted the permitted uses in the RS-20 and RS-5 districts are the same and
therefore in terms of land use the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the adjacent
existing residential uses. According to the records of the Putnam County Property Assessor,
the lot sizes of the 20 contiguous parcels range from approximately 93,525 square feet to
13,606 square feet. Of these 20 parcels, 12 consist of less than 20,000 square feet. Gauging
the impact of a higher density single family development on the property values of adjacent
lower density single family development is difficult. Smaller residential lot size does not
necessarily result in lower priced homes or even homes of smaller square footage. According
to the records of the Putnam County Property Assessor, the average appraised value of the 38
single family structures located between Rockwell Drive and Grandview Drive north of
Springboro Road is $91,476 (see enclosed). Property tax appraisals are often less than actual
market values and the actual average market value of these homes is probably closer to
$125,000 to $150,000.
The Cookeville Water Department indicates that public water, for both domestic and fire
protection purposes, is available to the subject property and is sufficient to serve the property
at the density allowed under RS-5 zoning. Water is available to the property from an existing
6 inch line located on McCulley Road. The developer would be responsible for all costs
associated with improvements necessary for the development of the property.
Access to public sewer is a primary requirement for residential developments at densities of
less than 20,000 square feet per dwelling unit. Gravity sewer service is currently not available
to the subject property. The Cookeville Water Department, however, has met with the
petitioner regarding the installation of a pumping station and has indicated that it would
accept the pumping station and collection system if the system is designed and installed per
their specifications. The developer would be responsible for all costs associated with
improvements necessary for the development of the property. It should be noted that should
the property be rezoned for higher density development it could not be developed at the
higher density unless sewer is made available.
The subject property is accessed by McCulley Road, a local residential street in good
condition with an average pavement width of 16 feet. The minimum acceptable pavement
width for streets with two-way traffic is 18 feet to 20 feet depending on the design of the
street. Any significant subdivision of the property, whether it is zoned as RS-20 or RS-5, will
require that the developer improve the width of McCulley Road. Access to McCulley Road
from East Spring Street is provided by Grandview Drive and Whitson Chapel Road. These
streets are currently not signalized at their intersections with East Spring Street. Grandview
Drive is a local residential street in good condition with an average pavement width of 19 feet.
Whitson Chapel Road is a minor collector street connecting East Spring Street with Buck
Mountain Road. It is in good condition with an average pavement width of 18 feet.
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 7
JULY 27, 2009
Assuming an average daily trip generation of seven (7) vehicle trips per day, a development
of 75 dwelling units can be projected to produce 525 vehicle trips per day. An average daily
traffic count on McCulley Road has not been determined but is estimated to be less than 100
vehicles per day. Traffic to and from McCulley Road would be dispersed onto Grandview
Drive and Whitson Chapel Road. The 2008 average daily traffic on Whitson Chapel Road at
its intersection with East Spring Street was 790. According to the Institute of Traffic
Engineers, local streets of appropriate widths with maximum speed limits of 35 MPH or less,
and lacking any significant design issues, generally can adequately handle average daily
traffic counts of up to 2,000 vehicles. While the existing streets may be able to absorb the
anticipated traffic increase, an additional 500 plus vehicle trips per day is significant.
The topography of the subject property can be generally described as level. An examination
of the city’s GIS sinkhole data indicates that small portions of sinkhole retention areas may
encroach on the property. Based on the GIS data the retention areas would not appear to have
a major impact on the development of the property. The impact of the retention areas and
other physical factors affecting the property, including drainage, would be analyzed and
addressed when and if the property is developed.
The most significant physical characteristic of the property affecting its development is street
frontage. Based on the information available to the Planning Department the property only
has frontage on McCulley Road at a width of approximately 160 feet. The Cookeville
Subdivision Regulations specify that a minimum of two access points be provided for single
family developments of more than 20 lots and that the maximum street length of a dead-end
street is 1,200 feet. The minimum separation of intersections of local streets on local streets
should be the width of one (1) block or a minimum of two (2) lots. Assuming that a minimum
right-of-way of 45 feet would be provided in the development of the property, the maximum
street intersection separation at McCulley Road that could be provided would be 70 feet,
which would not be sufficient. While there are several single family residential developments
located within the city with only one access point containing a great deal more than 20 lots,
most were developed prior to the adoption of the current Subdivision Regulations in 2000. It
should be noted that the Planning Commission has granted variances from the maximum
street length and number of lots in subdivisions since 2000; however, the Planning
Department is not aware of any variances that have allowed the number of lots that could
potentially be developed on the subject property should it be rezoned to RS-5.
In summation, the Planning Department is of the opinion that the subject property is not
appropriate for RS-5 zoning. This opinion is based primarily on the property’s existing street
frontage, which prohibits the provision of adequate access for the density of development
allowed under RS-5. It is also based on the impact of the potential traffic increase on the
existing residential streets that would result from a development at the density allowed under
RS-5 zoning. The Planning Department, however, is of the opinion that, with the provision of
sewer, the subject property is appropriate for the higher density single family residential
zoning of RS-10. The RS-10 zone is also for single family residential development and has a
minimum lot size requirement of 10,000 square feet. The setback requirements in the district
are 25 feet for front yards, 20 feet for rear yards, and 10 feet for side yards. The lot size
requirement of the RS-10 district is the generally the minimum necessary to justify the cost of
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 8
JULY 27, 2009
the extension of public sewer and provide lots affordable to the majority of potential home
buyers. Most of the subdivisions in the city with public sewer are zoned as RS-10 including
Old Kentucky Place, Windrowe, Village Green, Tanglewood and many others. Additionally,
RS-10 zoning for the subject property would be in conformity with the Future Land Use Plan.
Staff recommended denial of the request for rezoning to RS-5, but approval of rezoning the
property to RS-10, Single Family Residential.
Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser stated that the street system in the area was substandard and he was
concerned about the overload on the current streets.
Tim Huddleston stated that as the developer he would improve McCulley according to the
city standards. Mr. Huddleston added that he met with the Director of Water Quality Control
concerning the issue of gravity sewer and found out that it was not accessible to this property,
but he was told that he could install at his own expense a pumping station to this area. Tim
Huddleston also stated that he asked the Director of Planning which came first the rezoning or
the subdivision plat and he was advised that the rezoning request would come first
Mr. Huddleston stated that the market demand for starter homes in Cookeville is in the
$150,000 price range. The homes & lots will sell for between $150,000 to $170,000. The
study of the sinkhole will be addressed during the subdivision plat process. He added that the
Planning Commission has a provision that allows them to grant a waiver to allow one access
instead of two (2) accesses based on characteristics of the site and adjacent streets.
Dean Moore, 310 Whitson Chapel Road; Paul Bonner, 3210 Buck Mountain Road; Richard
Charles, 355 Whitson Chapel Road; Evelyn Handy, 1647 McCulley Road; Tim Smith, 501
Scenic Lane; and David Patterson, 500 Grandview Drive, spoke in opposition to rezoning the
property from RS20 to RS5. Some of their concerns were too much density, affect on property
values, additional traffic, McCulley Road too narrow, sinkhole study, and sewer availability.
Tim Huddleston suggested that if the City is not going to rezone any more property less than
RS20, then they might want to look at rezoning everything as PRD (Planned Residential
Development).
James Mills reiterated that the RS20 zoning was placed in areas all over Cookeville that did
not have access to sewer. It was the intent of the City to consider changing the zoning from
RS20 when sewer became available. If a developer has to put in sewer at his own expense
and develop the property under RS20 zoning, then the lots would be so expensive that the
average homeowner would not be able to afford the lots. Sinkhole studies, sewer availability,
improvements to existing roads are all reviewed when the property is developed.
Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser stated that he wanted to the City to grow in an orderly manner and he
didn’t want to rezone property with inadequate infrastructure.
Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser made the motion to deny rezoning 1629 McCulley Road from RS20 to
RS5. Judy Jennings seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously. DENIED.
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 9
JULY 27, 2009
Jim Stafne stated that the petitioner has the right to appeal the decision of the Planning
Commission to the City Council.
HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER FOR ACTION ANNEXATION OF
FREEHILL ROAD – NORTH WASHINGTON AVENUE AREA AND PLAN OF
SERVICES FOR SAME. REQUEST SUBMITTED BY STAFF. James Mills stated that
the Planning Department has completed a feasibility study on the annexation of
approximately 90 acres of property located north of the current corporate limits between
Freehill Road and North Washington Avenue. The study was initiated following the receipt
of individual requests for annexation from property owners in the area. The area proposed for
annexation is located entirely within the City of Cookeville Urban Growth Boundary.
Property owners in the proposed annexation area have been notified by mail and provided an
information package on the proposed annexation.
A Plan of Services for the proposed annexation area has also been prepared. It should be
reviewed on a point by point basis. A written report from the Planning Commission to the
City Council regarding the Plan of Services is required.
The study area consists of 49 parcels in their entirety and a portion of one (1) other. Located
on 38 of these 50 parcels are 65 residential housing units, of which 56 are occupied. The
estimated population of the area is 123 persons. There are approximately 0.53 miles of streets
in the area, with approximately 0.37 miles of these streets being in less than good condition.
At the present time, the proposed annexation area can be generally characterized as mixed
density residential. It has been identified in the Cookeville Future Land Use Plan as an area
primarily best suited for low density and mixed density residential development. The area has
a limited amount of undeveloped land. Topographically the area can be described as level to
gently rolling.
Water service to the entire proposed annexation area is currently provided by the City of
Cookeville. Approximately $76,000 in improvements will be necessary to bring the area up
to the same standards as in the corporate limits. While city sewer lines are already located in
a portion of the annexation property owners in the area are not able to connect to the system
because they are located outside the city. An estimated $380,000 in improvements will be
necessary to provide public sewer service to the entire area. Natural gas is available to a
portion of the area. The 18 current gas customers would have their rates reduced to the inside
city rate within approximately 60 days following annexation. Improvements costing
approximately $11,400 will be necessary to serve the entire area. It is anticipated that electric
service will continue to be provided by the Upper Cumberland Electric Membership
Cooperative unless the co-op agrees to cede the area to the City of Cookeville.
Approximately 16 street lights will be installed. The area is located within the 5 mile fire
service boundary of the city’s existing fire station located on North Washington Avenue.
Residents of the area proposed for annexation would receive numerous benefits as a result of
annexation. These include improved police and fire protection, reduction of ISO fire
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 10
JULY 27, 2009
insurance rating from Class 9 to Class 2 which can result in a savings on homeowners
insurance of up to 20 percent, reduction of water rates by over 30 percent, zoning protection,
street lighting, and weekly garbage pick up. Natural gas customers would received the inside
city rate, which is 25 percent less than the outside city rate.
Property owners would be required to pay city property tax. The current city property tax rate
is $0.87 per $100 of assessed value. Based on current tax appraisals the average annual city
property tax for a homeowner in the area would $149.10. Should this area be annexed in
2009, property owners would not be required to pay city property tax until 2010.
The estimated cost for the provision of all services to the proposed annexation area is
$484,000 of which the provision of sewer service is $380,000. The provision of sewer to the
annexation area is depicted on the Master Sewer Plan of the Department of Water Quality
Controls. The estimated annual revenue to the city from property and state shared taxes is
$21,700.
Staff recommended approval of Plan of Services and approval of annexation with
recommendation to City Council for RS-20, Single Family Residential Zoning and CL, Local
Commercial Zoning.
A petition of 17 names was presented to the Planning Commission at the meeting in
opposition to the annexation.
Several of the residents spoke in opposition: Donna Haynes, 495 Dogwood Circle; David
Morris, 2199 Freehill Road; Debbie Hannah & Eldon Hannah 2448 Hilham Road. Some of
their concerns were pigs, farming, new fence codes, building codes, and trailers.
Mr. Mills responded to their concerns.
Chris Wakefield made the motion to approve the Annexation area. Ryan Williams seconded
the motion. Votes: Jim Stafne-nay, Tod Williams-aye, Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser-nay, Judy
Jennings-nay, Chris Wakefield-aye, Ryan Williams-aye, Aaron Bernhardt-aye, and Randy
Dalton-aye. Motion carried. APPROVED.
CONSIDER FOR ACTION FINAL PLAT OF THE CUMBERLANDS OF
COOKEVILLE, A CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON THE
CORNER OF EAST SPRING STREET AND SOUTH MAPLE AVENUE. REQUEST
SUBMITTED BY SLADE STROUD. James Mills stated that Mr. Slade Stroud has
submitted for approval a Final Plat of The Cumberlands of Cookeville, a Condominium
Development, located at the southeast corner of North Maple Avenue and East Spring Street.
No preliminary plat was required for this development because it is classified as a minor plat
and no new public infrastructure is proposed or needed.
The property proposed for subdivision is identified on Tax Map 53F Group K as Parcel 5.00
and consists of approximately .697 acres. The property is zoned as CL (Local Commercial)
and the proposed use is equally split between residential and commercial. The four lower
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 11
JULY 27, 2009
units front East Spring Street and are for commercial use only. The upper four units are
addressed off North Maple Avenue and are for residential use only. The property is more than
25’ from the center line of the roads, and sidewalks abut both of the existing public streets.
The front setbacks along East Spring Street and North Maple Avenue are properly shown as
50’ and 30’ respectively, and the sides and rear of the property are 10’. The rear of the
property contains a public alley easement.
The new condos will be served by the existing water line located in the right-of-way of North
Maple Avenue and all units have individual meters. Three fire hydrants are within 290 feet of
the property. Sewer service will be provided from the sewer main located within the right-of-
way of East Spring Street. The Public Works Department has determined that all units will be
served by individual waste containers rather than dumpsters. The plat further depicts that the
required parking spaces have been provided. In addition, the parking area contains a detention
pond that has been designed and constructed with the approval of the Public Works
Department. No portion of the lot is in a Special Flood Hazard Area as noted on the plat. All
of the property and infrastructure is to remain private and repair and maintenance of the
common elements are to be covered under a homeowner’s association agreement that is to be
provided prior to plat recordation.
Staff recommended conditional final plat approval subject to the following: (1) Submission
of the recorded homeowner’s association agreement, and (2) Completion of corrections or
additions to the plat as determined necessary by the Planning Department and/or other
appropriate city departments
Ryan Williams made the motion to grant conditional final plat approval subject to staff’s
recommendation. Randy Dalton seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously.
CONDITIONAL FINAL PLAT APPROVAL.
Chris Wakefield made the motion to take the following item for study. Randy Dalton
seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously. STUDY ITEM.
(1) CONSIDER FOR STUDY AMENDMENT TO SECTION 218, PRD (PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT), REDUCING THE MINIMUM SIZE
REQUIREMENT IN SECTION 218.5. REQUEST SUBMITTED BY STAFF.
STAFF REPORTS:
(1) MINOR PLAT APPROVALS:
• THE BROWNSTONES SUBDIVISION, 2 LOTS LOCATED ON STOUT AND
BUNKERHILL ROAD – JUSTIN CUMBY.
• FOREST HILLS ESTATES REDIVISION OF LOTS 162 & 163, 2 LOTS LOCATED
ON THE CORNER OF LONE OAK AND CONTRABAND LANE – JAMES M.
ALLEN.
COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 12
JULY 27, 2009
ADJOURNMENT: 7:55 P.M.
SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL SUBMITTED FOR RECORDING
____________________________ _________________________________
JAYNE BARNS CPS JIM STAFNE, CHAIRMAN
PLANNING ASSISTANT COOKEVILLE PLANNING
COMMISSION
Get email alerts for Cookeville
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.