Planning Commission

COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 23' 2013 23' 2013 at 5:30 p'm" The Cookeville Planning Commission met on Monday, September Tennessee' in the Council Chambers, 45 E. Broad Street, Cookeville' Roy Loutzenheiser, Judy MEMBERS PRESENT: Jim Stafne, Dr. Angelo volpe, Dr. Jennings, Chris Wakefield, Randy Dalton, bavid Webb, Jim Woodford, and Kay Starkweather. and Ken Young' STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: James Mills, Jayne Barns, STAFF ABSENT: Jim ShiPleY. Jim Cobb' Jerry Gaw' OTHERS PRESENT: Eugene Harris, Mark Lee, Aaron Bernhardt, and William Hilker. TO ACTION ITEM A CONSIDER FOR ACTION MOVING FROM STUDY ITEM AVENUE LOCATED REQUEST FOR cLosuRE OF A PORTION OF LAUREL SUBMITTED BY BETwEEN wESiTt;ND wnsr 8rH STREETS. REQUEST AND LARRY AARON BERNHARDTO JERRY GAW, PAT FITZPATRICK REQUIRES THE l BURGESS. MOVING THIS ITEM FROM STUDY TO ACTION made the l AppRovAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser Jim woodford seconded the motion to approve moving this item from Study to Action. THIS ITEM motion and the motion carried unanimously. APPROVED MOVING FROM STUDY TO ACTION. Dr' Angelo Volpe CONSIDER FOR APPROVAL THE AGENDA AS SUBMITTED' Woodford seconded the motion made the motion to aJprove the agenda as submitted' Jim and the motion carried unanimously' APPROVED' 26' 2013' Randv CONSIDER FOR APPROVAL THE MINUTES OF AUGUST Kay Starkweather Dalton made the motion to approve the minutes of August26,2013' seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously. APPROVED' CONSIDER FOR ACTION RAO (REDEVELOPMENT AREA OVERLAY DISTRICT) ZONING FOR UNIVERSITY SQUARE PHASE II WHICH 7rH STREET. 712' INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING PROPERTIIiS 345-365 WEST 716 LATJREL AVENUE, 350-364 WEST 8rH STREET, AllD 721 CHESTNUT AVENUE (UNIVERSITY SQUARE PHASE II). REQUEST SUBMITTED BY JAMES MiIIS StAtEd AARON BERNHARDT ON BEHALF OF LARRY BURGESS' Burgess' has submitted a that Mr. Aaron Bernhardt, on behalf of property owner Larty request for RAO (Redevelopment Area Ou.ifuyj zoning of property located west Laurel Avenue and east oiChestnutAvenue between *est 7'h and West 8th Streets'  COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION , SEPTEMBER 23, 2013 The RAo District was created by ordinance Number ol3-01-02 which became effective earlier this year. The overlay district was created as a mechanism for the redevelopment, tevitalization' rehabilitation, and general improvement of areas within the City of Cookeville as identified within the Cookevitte zo:o Plan as being in need of such action, or other areas within the city as may be determined to be in need of such action. Within RAo districts, the city may waive or modify certain development requirements to provide incentives for redevelopment, including increases in density, reduction of setbacks, and reductions of lot sizes. Specific criteria must be met for properties to quaify for RAo zoning and a detailed process for approval must be followed. only those uses permitted in the underlying zoning may be permitted in a RAo district. To qualifu for RAo zoning the site must contain a minimum of one (l) acre when located within an areaidentified in the cookeville 2030 Plan as being in need of revitalization/redevelopment. The developer must submit and adhere to an approved development plan. The process for the approval of RAo zotinginvolves several steps. First the developer is required to meet with the Planning Director to determine whether the RAo zoning is appropriate for the-proposed property. If it is determined that the property is upprop.Tut" for RAo zoning,lhen-the developeimust submit a request for overlay zoning,a written statement describing the proposed development and htw it meets the objectives of the 2030 Plan, and a Preliminary RAo Concept Plan. The Concept plan floor and elevation plans. The Planning Commission, after reviewing -*ij"iira;^ri;;; the overlay zoning request and required submittals, must submit a recommendation to iire City Council for approval, modification, or denial of the request. Upon receipt of the planninj Commission recommendation the City Council then considers enactment of the overlay. " the overlay is enacted, a Final RAo Plan must be submitted to -once and approved by the Planning commission. The Final RAo Plan must be submitted within ri* the effective date of the enactment of the overlay by the City t;i months after Council or the ov erlay zoning action shall become null and void. Extension of no .r,or" than 18 months may be granted !v Lt" Planning Commission. The Final RAO Plan must substantially conform to the Preliminary RAO Concept Plan. Any substantial modifications to the upprorr.a Final RAO Plan must be resubmitted to the planning Commission. The property proposed for RAO zoning is identified as Parce Group A and consisls of approximately I.77 aues, or 77,101 I 21.00 on Tax Map 40O, square feet. The site is located entirely within an area identified in the Cookeville 2tfi0 planas being in need of redevelopment/revitalization. The underlying or existing zoning classification of the property is RD, Single and Duplex Residential. In conjuncti-on with the request for family RA,o zoning, Mr. Bernhardt has also iubmitted a request for the closure and abandonment of Laurel Avenue between West 7ft and West 8th'Streets, which bisects the University development and the proposed Phase II. He and his partners legut" own the properties on both sides of the street and the inclusion of the righrof-way, increase the land area-by approximat ely 0.25 acres to'approximatel if it is acqiirea, would y 2.02 acres or g7,gg0 square feet' The total land area would be reduced to approximately 1.84 acres or g0,150 square feet after the dedication of right-of-way along ilest 7th *a wl"lil Streets and Chestnut Avenue.  3 COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 23,2013 and as a mobile home The primary uses of the subject property are single family residential on the.property are pu.k^lpr"rriousty identified as the FiizzelMobile Home Park). Located homes, and 2 (two) out i"" fij single Amif/ Jweling, two (2) duplexes, eight (8) mobile The mobile buildings. The single family structure and the duplexes are in sound condition' home park is a nonconforming use. site Mr. Bernhardt has submitted a Preliminary RAO Concept Plan, written statement, plan, floor plans, elevation plans, photos and other materials required for RAO zoning as Phase II of the consideration. He indicates that the proposed RAO would be developed The application University Square RAO development, itti.tt is contiguous to the east. be constructed similar indicates that townhour., (singll family attached dweiings) would in appearance with those built in University Square Phase I' While townhouses are currently not a permitted use in the RD district, the City Council has- approved -an ZoningCode to allow townhouses as uses permitted on review by Ordinance urrrrrrAirrjttt. the Planning commission provided they are located in a RAO zone. The ordinance will become effective on October 4,2013. Laurel Avenue between The site plan, which.depicts the acquisition of the right-of-way of (2) il;'n;Jw;;t8,t d;;L, i.rai"ut"s that 40 townhouses would be clustered into(6)twounits' (1) group of six groups of nine (9) units, two (2) groups of eight (8) units and one i. toiut of 94 p*ting rpur.r'arJshown, which is nine (9) less than required' However' when combined *itti p'frur. I, a total of 181 spaces would be available for 75 dwelling the submitted development units, which exceeds the minimum requirement. According to (6) months. of approval of the schedule all existing structures would te removed within six two (2) years' RAo with rr"* ronlt*ction beginning thereafter and to be completed within The floor plans, which are the same as University Square, Phase I, depict the construction the first floor and two of two (2) story dwellings with kitchen, living, and dining aleas on (2) bedrooms and two (i) baths locatea o" G second floor. The elevation plans indicate utiuti"t construction and would mimic the structures in Phase I. installed and rain gardens Sidewalks along west gth Street and chestnut Avenue would be would be utilized for storm water detention instead of a detention pond' Existing where needed. All of the sidewalks along w*t zfr si*et would be repaired or replaced (extensions of Joy and proposed units would be accessed from in;rior privatl streets Charlotte Drives from Phase I). Parking areas wbuld be off the private streets and no direct vehicle access from pubiic streets to any dwelling will be provided. Canopy trees depicts the provision of a are to be planted along all street frontages. ihe site plan also Drives' common green space aiea between the extensions of Joy and Charlotte As noted the developer wishes to constru ct 40 dwellings, whiclr it T increase a of zoning, which requires approximat ely 24units over what could be constructed under RD the provisions of the minimum of 5,000 square feet of land area per dwelling unit. Under per acre' which is RAO district, the ciiy may allow a density bonus of up to 20 units acres' or approximately 2,178 tq"*! feet per dwelling unit. Fo1 an area containing2'02 87,gg0 square feet, the city can approve up ti +0 dwelling units. The total land area after  COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 4 SEPTEMBER 23,2013 dedication of right-of-way for adjoining streets would be reduced to approximately l.g4 acres' or 80,150 square feet, which would be 37 units in an RAO zone. ltre rigtrt-of-way dedication consists of approximately 6,800 square feet which equates to three (3) units. The developer is req.uesting reductions in the front setback requirements to 15 feet along West 7th and West 8ih Streeis and Chestnut Avenue. This would allow the structures in alignment with the structures in University Square, Phase I.. According totothe be preliminary RAO Plan, the structures along Wbst ith and West 8th Streets would be staggered so that approximately half would be setback at 17 feet and half at 15 feet. The minimum front setback requirement in the RD district is 20 feet or five (5) feet more than the requested reduction. Most of the existing structures are located withinthe required 20 foot setback area. It should also be noted that the developer will dedicate approximately five (5) feet of property along West 7m Street and approximately ten (10) feei^of property along Chestnut Avenue and West 8th Street to priviae 25 feet from the centerline of adjoining streets as right-of-way for future improviments to the streets. The developer also requests a waiver of up to $1,025.00 in fees for fence permits, for the city to pay half of the street lighting expense as was done in Phase I, and for a joint venture with the city to replace existing sidewalks on West 7th Street that are in less than good condition. Staff recommended approval of Preliminary RAO Concept Plan for the development of 40 single family attached dwellings, subject io the closure, abandonment and acquisition of the righrof-way of Laurel Avenue between West 7th and West 8th Streetq and approvat of the requested setback reductions with recommendation to City Council for the enactment of RAO zoning' waiver of fence permit fees in the amount requested, and for authorization of the requested assistance in street lighting and sidewalk replacement. Eugene Harris spoke on behalf of his father, who lives at 339 West 8th Street. Mr. Harris stated that his father has had more problems with drainage since the new apartment development has been built, and, that he had contacted Public Works about this issue, but they had not called him back. I\zIr. Harris was concerned for the safety of individuals pulling out on North Willow Avenue from West 8th & 9th Streets, "because dangerous to turn left or right on Willow Avenue, and due to these it was safety issues, he was opposed to Laurel Avenue being closed. Mr. Harris also had a concern ttrat westi,fr it.""t was naffow and that Tech Students from the new development had been parking on g,h Street, and that it would be difficult for an ambulance to pass the vehicles. Mr. Harris requested that the city put up No parking Signs on west gth dtreet. James Mills stated that residents cannot park on the street and that he would ask public Works put up some No parking signs on West gth Street. Chris Wakefield made the motion to approve the RAO (Redevelopment Area Overlay) zoning for 345-365 west 7rH Street, 712-jr6 Laurel Avenue, :so-:oi sTi w* 721 Chestnut Avenue. Jim Woodford seconded the motion and the motion carried srl.;:;;; unanimously. APPROVED RAO ZONING.  5 COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 23, 2013 CONSIDERF.oRACTIONAREQUESTFoRCL9|SUREoFAPO'RTIONoF zt" AND WEST 8rH STREETS' LAUREL AVENUE LoCATEu snrilifNl Wnsi REQUESTSUBMITTEDBYnnnoNBERNHARDT,JERRYGAw,PAT FITZPATRICKANDLARRYnuncnss.THEPETITIONERSHAVE REQUESTEDTHATTHISITEMBEMOVEDFROMSTUDYToACTION. REQUIRES THE APPROVAL MOVING THIS ITEM FROM STUNY TO ACTION oFTHEPLANNINGCoMMrssroN.JamesMillsstatedthattheownersofthe 7tl' and West 8tl' Streets have West properties on both sides of Laurel Avenue between i and declared as surplus property' submitted a request trrua be closed and abandoned According to a submitted survey, the portiol 9f Llurel Avenue requested for closure is width of approximately 40 feet' approximat ely 273 i..i i" length'and liu, u right-of-way on the eastem The total land area tigfnlof-way is 0.25 i"t"t' The right-of-yut ylqq "iift. by the dedication of ten (10) feet of property side and total land area was recently increased bv Mr' Bernhardt and others' from the Universit| iq.r*" RAO; *fti"ft-*ut developed Laurel Avenue currentry extends rr"* iv.t, zlt s,r""i,i w"ri 9th Street. It also runs from West 3'd Street to West 6h Street' The procedure for the closure and abandonment of streets or right-of-ways is specified in Thi procedure includes the Title 16, Chapter + of the Cooketiii;-M;ticipal Code' following: o Submittal of written request and payment of fee o Submittal of surveY contacted and concur with o Confirmation that all affected property owners-have.been all adjoining property owners have the closure and abandonment (it ir';i;y foficy that ale approveJ' one-half the right-of- the right to purchase, if closure and aLandonment *uy u'iorrg which the property is contiguous) r Review by applicable city departments o Review and approval of Planning Commission o Approval of CitY Council o purchase of property based on a value established by the city Manager (any appraisal andlorrecording to be paid for by the petitioner) "ortt portion of the public street proposed for There are two (2) parcels contiguous with the closure and abandonment. Parcel 21.00 o' Mup 40 O, Group A, owned B and B on the westem boundary and Parcel 24'00 Partnership, is contiguous with the right-of-way Jerry Gaw, and Pat Fitzpatrick' is on Map 40o, Group A, owned by Auron Bernhardt, contiguous on the eastern boundary. Located on Parcel 24'00 is the University Square Phase. II on Parcel 21'00' RAo and a r.q,r.rihas b"en submifieJ for University Squareto acquire the subject street The owners of the two (2) contiguous properties would.like University Square Phase II development' right-of-way and incorporate it into the ptopot"a departments' The Water Quality The request has been reviewed by the applicable.-city (2)-incfriine would be disconnected and Control Department indicates that an ""ft,t"g two The Gas Department indicates that recommends that an existing fire hydrant be-relocaied'  COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 23,2013 6 an existing gas line would be terminatla wjth the II' The Electric Department indicates that it woulddevelopment of university square phase need io retain utility easements ten (10) feet in width on both sides of the street. Staff recommended approval of closure and abandonment and declaration as surplus property with conveyange of right-of-way to property owrers in compliance with the Municipal code subject to the retention {jgining l orutitityJaiements as determined necessary. l Eugene-Harris spoke on behalf of his father, I who lives at 339 west gth street. He was still L opposed to a portion of Laurel Avenue being closed. Residents should not have to go out of their way to get to a street light on North Wilto* Avenue. James Mills stated that North willow Avenue was a State Route and he said that there would never be a signal at west 8th Street, but he ttroughtihere was a possibility for a light at west 9th Street' Mr. Mills added that in order , to"widen North willow Avenue from Broad Street to l2th Street for a turn lane that additional right-of-way would have to be dedicated from the property owners in the area. Mr. Mills has already talked to Mr. Gaw and Mr. Bernhardt about dedicating right-of-way on North willow Avenue. Jerry Gaw and Aaron Bernhardt both agreed at the meeting e that they would dedicate right- of-way for North Willow to be impro.v.i fo, a turn lane. Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser made the motion to close a portion between West 7th and West gth Streets. Randy of Laurel Avenue located Dalton seconded the motion and the motion carried A F CONSIDER F'OR ACTION RAO (REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT) ZONING FOR 423 & 429 WEST BROAD AREA OVERLAY STREET AND 116 & 118 CHESTNUT AV-E_NYE. REQUEST SUBMITTED JERRY GAw AND TIM STovER. James Mills BY AARON BERNHARDT, stated that Mr. Aaron Bernhardt, on behalf of Bernhardt LLC, Jeny c. Gaw, Inc. and Tim Stover, has submitted a request for RAo {Redevelopment Ar-ea overlay) zaning for their properties located at 423 and 429 west Broad street and l r6 and 11g A and B bhestnut Avenue. lhe gronerties proposed for RAo zoningare identified as parcels 2.00, 27.00and 2g.00 on Tax Map 53A, Group D and consists Jf approxi^itity-z.zacres combined. The site is located entirely within an area identified in itre cookeville 2030 plan as being in need of redevelopmenthevitarization- The underlying or .tiuirg rfiiui]u;ffiiln of parcel 2'00 is RD, Single Family and Duplex Residential and of"parc etsll.ooand 2g.00 it is CG, General Commercial. The primary use of the proposed RAo site is residential. Located on parcel 2.00 are a single family residential structure and a two are vacant with two (2) deteriorated single Q) unit apartment. parcels 27.00and 2g.00 famiiy rtruciure, having ut br"rr r"-ou"d. The structures located on parcel 2.00 arEin less tir* gooJ condition. "iay  COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 7 SEPTEMBER 23,2013 statement' site Mr. Bernhardt has submitted a Preliminary RAO Concept Plan, written plan, floor plans, elevation plans, photos and other materials required for RAO zoning (single family attached dwellings) consideration. The application indicates that townhouses townhouses are of two (2) different'ioo,. plans and sizes would be constructed. While use in the RD district' permitted uses in the CG district, they are currently not a permitted code to allow The city council has approved an ordinance amending the Zoning they are on review by the Planning- Commission provided townhouse. u, ,rr", f*-iti.A October 4,2013' located in a RAO zone. The Ordinance wilibecome effective on into five (5) groups of six The site plan indicates that 36 townhouses would be clustered the construction of (6) units and two (2) groups of three (3) units. The fl.991p1ans depict the construction of 12 24 single level uni#.iritf, i*o (2) bedrooms and two (2) baths and (2.5) baths' The elevation two (2) story units with two (2)bedrooms and two and one half plans indicate all brick construction with Hardy Plank accents. According to the submitted within 60 days of approval development schedule all existing structues would be removed within one of the RAO with new construction beginning thereafter and to be completed and a half (1.5) Years. Sidewalks along chestnut Avenue would be installed and rain gardens on west Broad detention instead of Street and Chestnut Avenue would be utilized for storm water detention ponds. All of the proposed units would be accessed from an interior private street. canopy trees are to be planted along all street frontages. 36 dwellings, which ) According to the submitted materials the petitioners wish to construct under cG is an increase of approximately three (3) units over what could be constructed square feet of land area per and RD zoning,*ftittt require a minimum of 2,500 and 5,000 : 1 1 (approximately square Ij dwelling unit. For the portion of the property zoned ut lD .12'395 as CG (approximately I feet) two (2) units .o,rid be constructed and'for the portion zoned 79,000 square feeq if units could be constructed. Under the provisions of the RAO per acr-e,- which is district, the city may allow a density bonus 9f Yg to 20 units I area containing 2'l acres' or approximat ely i,178 rqrrur. feet per dwelling unit. For an it',+lS rqrr*. feet, the tity.*approve upto 42 dwelling units' from 20 feet and The developer is requesting reductions in the rear setback requirements is 20 feet for multi-family 15 feet to 10 feet. within the cG district the rear yard setback RD district the rear yard residential developments and 10 feet for alr other uses. within the pay half of the street lighting setback is 15 feet. The developer also requests that the city expense as was done in the University Square Phase I development. for the development of 36 Staff recommended approval of Preliminary RAO Concept Plan setback reductions with single family attach# dwellings and approval of the requested recommendation t" CitV Council for the enactment of RAO zoning and for authotization of the requested street lighting assistance. his property is william Hilker, property owner at 126 A-D Chestnut Avenue, stated that concerned about the drainage adjacent on the nortl side of the request for RAO. He was  COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 8 SEPTEMBER 23,2013 toward his property and would request that the drainage be directed toward the west. He was also concerned about the safety of the kids that livi in his units and requested that Mr. Gaw put in a security fence adjacent to this property. Jerry Gaw agreed to put up a fence next to his property. Dr' Angelo Volpe made the motion to approve the RAO (Redevelopment Overlay) Zoning. Jim Woodford seconded the motion and the motion canied unanimously. AppROvED RAO ZONING. CONSIDER F'OR ACTION VARIANCE F'OR A FLAG LOT AND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL OF' THE REDIVISION OF LOTS 8-I4,22-28, BLOCK D OF THE H. E. NEELY SUBDIVISION, 3 LOTS LOCATED ON NORTH MAPLE AVENUE. REQUEST SUBMITTED BY MARK & REGINA LEE. Ken Young stated that property owner Mark Lee has submitted a request for a variance to allow the creation of one flag lot and final plat approval of the Re-division of Lots g-14,22-2g. Block D of the H' E' Neely Subdivision, a proposed three (3) lot single family residential development of his property fronting North Maple Avenue. As shown on the plut, Mr. Lee is purchasing a strip of land of varying width along the northern boundary of ihe adjacent parcel - owned-by Harriet Rowland to add to Lot 3 of the subdivision, ,o ih. lot will have 25 feet of street frontage on North Maple Avenue as required by the Subdivision Regulations for a flag lot. The properties proposed for this development are identified as parcels 5.00 and 6.00 on Tax Map 40O Group C and consists of approximately 1.32 acres. The site is zoned RS-10 as are properties to the east, south and west. The adjacent property to the north is zoned RM8' Both parcels contain existing single family iesiaentiai structures. As previously stated, Mr. Lee has requested that the Planning Commission consider granting a variance to allow one flag lot. A flag lot is defined in the Subdivision Regulation-s ..a as lot which is accessed by a strip of land of a width less than the required street frontage and which is located behind another lot which meets the required strlet frontage." ertiJte X Section G of the Subdivision Regulations specifies that flLg lots shall be p.lt*itt.a oniy for existing lots of record and upon the approval of avarianJe by the Planning Commission subject to the following conditions: a' The parcel of land prop_osed for subdivision to include a flag lot shall have depth to width ratio excee diig 21.t. b. No access strip shall-be less than25 feet in width for its entire length. c' The acc^es.s strip shall qrovi{e ?cceq: for only o". foi unO shall be?eeded and platted as apart of the building site. No building or structure shatt be located il d' The.access strip shal not exceed 500"feet ih; u"r*, ,trip. shall be located side-by-side. il i.rgth-;; no rno.. th* i*o u.ress strips e' The point ryhere the access strip-visibility abuts the public street shall be safe for vehicular ars far as uio-giuJ" ur. concerned since, unlike i1t-1:::.,i9,,:g."1t conventional f' i;;ii;;. lots,.flag lots have no other alternati',res for driveway All required building-setbacks shall apply;rab; rn"uiur"o from the boundaries of the portion of the lot exCluding the accesjrtrip COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 9 SEPTEMBER 23,2013 g. The developer shall restrict thg qag lot from further subdivision unless a street meeting all requiremed, l;;l;aing--iight-"of-*uy, ir constructed. Said restriction shall be placedon the Final Plat. standards' In no case shall a flag lot be used to avoid constructing a street to the required The lots will be served by the existing two inch waterline located in the right-of-way of proximity of North Maple Avenue. Thlre is one fiie hydrant located within the required Street . Access the lots at the southeast intersection of North Maple Avenue and East 21tt inch line also in the right- to the public sewer is available to the site from the existing eight of-way of North Maple Avenue. No portion of the subject property is located in a Special of property is indicated as Flood HazardArea as stated on the plat certificate. No area the being in a sinkhole retention area. that the variance Since the petitioner has met the criteria for a flag lot, Staff recommended approval for a flag iot be granted. In addition, the Planning Staffrecommended conditional of the final plat subject to the following: o Completion of corrections or additions to the plat as determined necessary by the Phnnlng Department and/or other appropriate city departments Jim Woodford made the motion to grant approval for the variance for a flag lot and to grant conditional Final Plat approval of the Redivision of Lots 8-I4,22-28, Block D of the H. E. Neely Subdivision, subject to completion of corrections or additions to the plat as determined necessary by the Planning Department and/or other aPProPriate citY unanimouslY. departments. Chris Wakefield seconded the motion and the motion carried VED CE FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. Dr. Roy Loutzenheiser made the motion to take the following items for study' Jim Woodford seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously. STUDY ITEMS' (t) CONSIDER FOR STUDY REZONING 218 & 233 E. 8rH STREET' 720,734,832, & 836 N. JEFFERSON AVENUE FROM RS15 TO RS10. REQUEST SUBMITTED BY JAKE LYNN ON BEHALF OF LYNNDERS PARTNERSHIP' MATTHEW & KATHERINE HILL, JOHN MCCAWLEY' SEAN & MICHELLE O'NEALO SOPHONPHAN SRITHANYARATN AND CHRIS & LAURA BURGIN. (2) CONSIDER FOR STUDY PRELIMINARY PLAT OF TBD (TO BE DETERMTNED), 24 LOTS LOCATED ON EAST SPRING STREET. REQUEST SUBMITTED BY JERRY GAW. COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION 10 SEPTEMBER 23, 2013 STAFF REPORTS: (1) MrNOR PLAT APPROVALS: O IMPERIAL DIXIE & STOVERS RENTAL DIVISION _ 2 LOTS LOCATED ON IMPERIAL DRIVE AND SOUTH WILLOW AVENUE _ DAN EICH. O AVERY PLACE SUBDIVISION COMBINATION PLAT FOR LOTS 7&8_1 LOT LOCATED ON AVERY PLACE _ JERRY GAW. ADJOURNMENT: 6:26 P.M. SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL SUBMITTED F'OR RECORDING JAYNE BARNS CPS JIM STAFNE, CHAIRMAN PLANNING ASSISTANT COOKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION