City Council Meetings
Regular MeetingCortez, CO · November 3, 2015
Minutes
CORTEZ CITY COUNCIL/BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SPECIAL WORKSHOP
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2015
The workshop began at 5:30 p.m., with dinner served. Councilmembers present were Mayor
Karen Sheek, Mayor Pro-tem Ty Keel, Tom Butler, Bob Archibeque, Shawna McLaughlin, and
Jim Price. Councilmember Orly Lucero was absent. Montezuma County Commissioners
present were Chairman Keenen Ertel, Larry Don Suckla, James Lambert, and staff included
County Attorney John Baxter, and County Administrator Melissa Brunner. City staff present
included Director of Public Works Phil Johnson, Director of Planning and Building Sam
Proffer, City Clerk Linda Smith, and City Manager Shane Hale. There were six people present
in the audience.
1. Courthouse Building Permit Fee. Discussion was held on the construction of an
approximately 27,000 square foot administration building/courthouse to be located at the
southwest corner of Park Street and Driscoll, due south of the jail. County Administrator
Brunner gave background on the proposal and asked if there were any exemptions the City
could give in the way of building permit/water tap fees for the project. Discussion was held
on the fees that would be required for the project. City Manager Hale stated that the City
cannot waive the water tap fees as the City has a bonded debt on the City service. In answer
to a question from Mayor Sheek, Chairman Ertel stated that they hope to break ground for
the new facility in the spring and be completed by year end 2016. City Manager Hale spoke
of the PUD Subdivision design guideline requirements. Chairman Ertel commented that the
new Justice Building would benefit everyone in the community and asked that the City
consider alleviating the costs by waiving some of the fees.
2. Future of Justice Center. Discussion was held on the current Justice Building and it was
noted that the County owns the building and the City has joint management of the parking
area. City Manager Hale stated that the City does not have an interest in the building;
however, if the building were leveled the property could be added to the park. The County
stated that they may have several entities interested in the building including the Bridge
Shelter which currently operates out of the building. The County stated that they may offer
the building on the market and Council asked that the County keep them apprised of any
changes that may occur at the Justice Building.
3. Co-Owned Roads. City Manager Hale stated that there were seven roads that are co-owned
by the City and County and that it made sense for the City to take over ownership and
maintenance of four of the streets: Alamosa Street, East Empire, Hawkins Street, and West
7th Street. Discussion was held on each of the streets and where they connected at the City
and the County lines. The County stated that they would want to speak with their Road and
Bridge Supervisor Rob Englehart before moving forward with the ownership of any roads.
Discussion was held about the completion of East 7th Street to Road 27. It was determined
that the City would not participate in any 7th Street improvements, due to its limited street
funds and plans to develop Cactus Street in 2016.
4. Blight. A brief discussion was held regarding the blight throughout the City and County and
it was agreed that there are properties that need to be cleaned up. The County advised that
they were limited with what they could do regarding code enforcement.
5. County Road L Impact Fees. City Manager Hale stated that the City owns the former Four
Corners Material Property (19 plus acres) which was purchased with an intent of developing
an addition to the current Industrial Park as the existing Industrial Park is completely built
out. He asked about the road impact fees that would be required by the County for
development of the property. County Chairman Ertel stated that the County would be
interested in working with the City on the road impact fees if a business were to be
interested in the property that would be a benefit for everyone, such as bringing new jobs to
the area. Discussion was held on swapping City building permit fees for the new courthouse
in exchange for road impact fees for the development in the Industrial Park.
6. 7th Street Extension. Discussion on the extension of 7th Street to Road 27 was held during
the Co-Owned Road discussion (item 4).
7. 3-Mile Plan. City Manager Hale stated that all municipalities in Colorado are required to
have a 3-mile plan per CRS 31-12-105. He stated that the plans include any necessary
IGAs, possible agreements regarding urban growth boundaries, joint land use planning
and/or annexation and that the City would be updating its plan through the Land Use Code
update process. City Manager Hale continued that on a related subject the City has not been
receiving notice of developments within 2-miles of the City limits in time to have the City’s
Planning and Zoning Commission offer their comments on the project before the County’s
Planning and Zoning Commissioner’s make their recommendation to the County
Commissioners. Discussion was held on having the County notice the City at least 21 days
prior to the County’s Planning and Zoning meeting so the City would have the opportunity
to offer their comments. In replying to a question raised by Chairman Ertel, City Manager
Hale advised that while CRS 30-28-136 requests that notice be given within 2-miles, the
City’s biggest concern relates to development much closer to its borders. City Manager
Hale also inquired as to the County’s willingness to consider establishing a joint Planning
Commission regarding any development within a mile of the City’s border due to the
impacts of this development on the City and the likelihood that these properties will
eventually be annexed.
8. Landfill Charges. The County stated that they are looking at a 10% increase at the landfill
for 2016. County Commissioner Suckla spoke about the County’s new recyclables program
and commented that it will take several years before the program could possibly break
even. Chairman Ertel noted that the landfill increase proposed for 2016 is partially due to
the replacement of the scale and the need to reline the baler. He stated that the fee increase
does not have anything to do with the loose fill versus the bale operation of the landfill. The
County spoke about changes which they are making at the landfill and discussion was held
regarding the cost effectiveness of recycling.
9. Golf Course/Armory Property and Easement. City Manager Hale stated that the County
would like to have an entrance onto the armory property for their fleet vehicles from the
new access road the City recently developed to the golf course shop. He stated that staff
does not see any issues with the access; however, an Intergovernmental Agreement needs to
be completed so that each entity knows their responsibilities for the access maintenance, as
the City has done 100% of the maintenance up until now.
Final Discussion included the City supporting the County in opting out of Senate Bill No. 152
(regarding broadband) and live streaming of the City Council meetings. The County noted that
they would review their road plan with their supervisor and get back to the City on the co-owned
road situation. It was noted that City is not interested in participating in the extension of 7th
Street and the County stated that they would try to notice the City 21 days prior to the County’s
Planning and Zoning meetings on any development that is located within 2-miles of the City.
The County commented that the landfill fees are proposed to be increased by up to 10% in 2016.
The City will research ways in which they can help the County in regard to building permit fees
for the new courthouse and the County will get back to the City on an equitable way to deal with
the impact fees for County Road L. Commissioner Lambert suggested that each entity waive the
same percentage of fees, for example: the City waive 50% of the building permit fees and the
Board of County Commissioners could waive 50% of the road impact fees. A brief discussion
was also held on a future solar garden that could be jointly used by the City and County.
The workshop was adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
Get email alerts for Cortez
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.