City Council

CITY OF DANBURY Town of New Fairfield 155 DEER HILL AVENUE DANBURY, CONNECTICUT 06810 4 Brush Hill Road www.danbury-ct.gov New Fairfield, Connecticut 06812 ELISA ETCHETO Jean Green LEGISLATIVE ASSISTANT PHONE: 203-797-4514 Administrative Assistant to the First FAX: 203-796-1529 Selectman e.etcheto@danbury-ct.gov (203)312-5600 MEETING NOTICE Who: Margerie Reservoir Trail Advisory Committee When: Tuesday, August 19, 2025 6:30PM Where: Danbury City Hall – 155 Deer Hill Avenue 3rd Floor Purpose: Margerie Reservoir Trail Advisory Committee Meeting #16 *Original agenda Item on file with the Danbury Legislative Assistant & with the Town of New Fairfield Committee Members & Representatives: Holly Robinson, City Council Member, City of Danbury David Day, Public Utilities Superintendent, City of Danbury Corporation Counsel Representative, City of Danbury Ken Gucker, Alternate, Danbury Jeff Main, Conservation & Inland Wetland Commission, New Fairfield Peter Hearn, New Fairfield Ann Marie Mellas, Alternate, New Fairfield Posted Notices: Town Clerk, City of Danbury & New Fairfield Information Board, City of Danbury City Website, City of Danbury & New Fairfield  Updated 8/20/25 Margerie Reservoir Trail Advisory Committee (Meeting #16) AGENDA When: 6:30 PM – Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Where: Danbury City Hall – 3rd Fl – 3C 155 Deer Hill Avenue ______________________________________________________________________________ Call to Order Roll Call 1. Minutes July 22, 2025 1B. Progress Reports #5 and #6 2. Invoices Invoice # 12011 Invoice # 11558 Invoice # 12195 3. Communications to the Committee 4. Recommendations Danbury City Council & New Fairfield Board of Selectmen 5. Meeting Schedule 6. Adjournment *Note: This meeting will not include a public comment period.  1 Margerie Reservoir Trail Advisory Committee (Meeting #15) July22, 2025 Chair Robinson called the meeting to order at 6:36p.m. on Tuesday, July 22, 2025 at the New Fairfield Community Center. Present were Committee Members: David Day, City of Danbury; Peter Hearn, New Fairfield; Jeff Main, New Fairfield; Ken Gucker, Alternate, City of Danbury. Absent was Ann Marie Mellas, Alternate, New Fairfield. There is one Vacancy on the Committee. Also present was Joseph Mortelliti, Outside Counsel, City of Danbury; and several members of the public. Chair Robinson completed roll call. 1. Minutes: Corrections were identified in the minutes from the June 17th meeting. A motion was made by Member Hearn, seconded by Member Main, to amend the minutes. Motion carried unanimously. A motion was made by Member Hearn, seconded by Member Main, to approve the minutes as amended. Motion carried unanimously. Chair Robinson noted the resignation of Committee Member Antonio Iadarola. Chair Robinson discussed the purpose of the committee, the process thus far, and the intent to present a recommendation regarding the proposed trail to both the Danbury City Council and New Fairfield First Selectmen once the design process is completed. 2. Public Speaking: Chair Robinson identified a three-minute limit for each speaker. Carl Anderson, New Fairfield Resident – Spoke against the trail and discussed his concerns with congestion, and the need for greater transparency and access to information. Jim Fandell, New Fairfield Resident – Spoke against the trail and expressed his concerns with the affect of the trail on the town’s population. Tom Perkins, New Fairfield Resident – Asked for a breakdown of committed funding for the project. John Kreise, New Fairfield Resident – Asked about trail parking, security, and costs. He discussed concerns with overcrowding and water pollution. Jennifer Pappas, New Fairfield Resident – Spoke about concerns with a trail in Brookfield; identified noise and car pollution, eagle nest, and safety concerns. Ms. Pappas identified a FOIA request regarding communication about the project. John McCartney, New Fairfield Resident – Spoke in favor of the trail as a safe place for children and seniors. He discussed the online support for the project and the benefits of having a trail in your community. Chris Halloway, New Fairfield Resident – Spoke against the trail due to its impact on the environment. Asked about safety and emergency response on the trail. Kelly Linquist, New Fairfield Resident – Discussed concerns with the eagle’s nest. Tom Hicks, New Fairfield Resident & Business Owner – Asked about the impact on businesses, discussed concerns with safety and increased taxes. Joseph (inaudible), New Fairfield Resident – Asked about the cost of the trail, maintenance, insurance, parking, environmental impact, and safety needs. Melanie Horn, New Fairfield Resident – Asked that a DEEP representative attend a meeting to address public concerns. 3. Project updates: Chair Robinson reiterated the purpose of the Committee; specifically, the task of reviewing the feasibility of the trail so that the finding can be presented to the legislative bodies in Danbury and New Fairfield. Member Hearn spoke on the committee’s previous discussion of a new invoice approval process; he confirmed that New Fairfield has specific approval requirements and all invoices will continue to be approved by the committee at their regular meetings. Member Hearn confirmed that he is working on a draft project report (#5) for DEEP that will include financials in a format that New Fairfield has requested. The First Selectwoman will sign-off on these reports. He confirmed that he will provide reports and invoices for the agenda moving forward. He confirmed for Chair Robinson that DEEP project reports #5 and #6 are expected to be submitted in August. 4. Invoices: No invoices. 5. 2025 Meeting Schedule: Chair Robinson suggested that the remaining meetings all take place in New Fairfield due to the availability of a larger meeting room. A motion was made by Member Hearn, seconded by Member Main, to approve the meeting schedule dates; with the August 19th meeting taking place in Danbury. Motion carried unanimously. Alt. Member Gucker expressed the need for both communities to be able to attend and be involved with the process. Chair Robinson explained that the location of future meetings will be discussed at the August meeting. Member Hearn agreed that a larger space is needed for Danbury meetings. 6. New Business: Member Hearn spoke on the need for the B&L website to be updated with a Frequently Asked Questions section to address continues concerns. Chair Robinson noted that estimated costs will come as the consultant finalizes the design of the trail and spoke on plans for sponsorships and grants to help cover costs. Alt. Member Gucker began to comment on the public’s attendance of past meetings. Adjournment: A motion was made by Member Day, and seconded by Member Hearn, to adjourn. The motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 7:27pm. Respectfully submitted, Holly Robinson, Chair; David Day, Jeff Main, and Peter Hearn.  1B: Progress Report #5 Grantee/Contractor Name: New Fairfield Contract Value: $2,284,000 Contract End Date: 8/12/2027 Project Summary # 5. Reporting Period: August 13, 2024 through February 12, 2025 Supporting Narrative – Progress on Planned Activities – (2 pages plus attached spreadsheet) 1. Work Completed: The Margerie Trail Advisory Committee (Committee) met In September, December of 2024 and in January of 2025. Below is what was accomplished at each meeting. Included with the narration of this report is a spreadsheet showing expenditures during that period.  September 24, 2024. The meeting began with public comments. Committee discussion turned to the wetlands survey that had been authorized and was underway. The responses to the RFP for a trail design were reviewed by the Committee. It was decided to send to the responders a list of additional considerations to be included in their plan.  December 17, 2024. A public comment period was allowed. Mr. Villavicencio of Barton and Loguidice (B&L), which had been chosen as contractor for the trail plan, presented the Margerie Reservoir Trail design plans to the Committee. He provided a brief overview of the project’s schedule, costs and objectives. He reviewed the previous Rt 37 corridor study and discussed trail designs, outlined a proposed design and described the preliminary design process. He provided details about the website launch. Members of the Committees stressed the importance of addressing, in the trail design, any concerns that had been expressed by some members of the public. These were: privacy buffering, pedestrian safety, proximity to residential areas, increased noise, avoiding wetlands and protection of the eagle habitat.  January 28, 2025. The Committee approved the invoice # 10726 from B&L for $28,140 and invoice # 10336 for $32,160. The invoices comprise the work done up to that date by B&L including the Permit Review Process with CT DEEP and the creation of a project website with an online survey and interactive map. The Committee also authorized newspaper ads to inform the public of the online survey that was designed by B&L to elicit public opinion with respect to the utility of a trail and design preferences. Expenditures were allowed up to $1,100 for the Danbury News Times and for the Town Tribune. Member Ken Gucker had arranged the printing of flyers containing a QR link to the survey that had been distributed in both municipalities. 1  It was reported that the FOIA requests had been answered by Danbury to the extent that the requested information existed. It was decided that such communications be sent to Mr. Mortelliti who could respond to them. Members of the public were invited to speak. 2. Total Funds expended as of 2/12/2025: $ 130,135 (See attached spreadsheet.) Signature _______________________________ 8/6/2025 Date ________ Melissa Lindsey, First Selectman 2  Margerie Reservoir Trail Expenses to Date Date Vendor Description/Reference Amount 10/19/23 Hearst Media 2796206-09072023 Legal No $ 313.45 04/11/24 Hearst Media 2834375-03162024 $ 271.80 11/22/24 Sydney A. Rapp Land Surveying Part 1 - Topographic Surv $ 54,000.00 11/22/24 Sydney A. Rapp Land Surveying Part 2 - Wetland Delineat $ 15,250.00 02/05/25 Barton & Loguidice Inv. 10726 $ 28,140.00 02/05/25 Barton & Loguidice Inv.10336 $ 32,160.00 TOTAL $ 130,135.25 Through 2/12/2025 POWERSCHOOL PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 07/28/2025 TOWN OF NEW FAIRFIELD AUDIT21 TIME: 09:21:46 EXPENDITURE AUDIT TRAIL SELECTION CRITERIA: orgn.fund='302' and orgn.orgn1 like '4110%' and expledgr.account='720.08' ACCOUNTING PERIODS: 1/24 THRU 13/24 SORTED BY: FUND,DEPARTMENT,ACCOUNT TOTALED ON: PAGE BREAKS ON: FUND - 302 - TOWN CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET UNIT - 30241100000001 - MARGERIE RESERVOIR TRAIL ACCOUNT CUMULATIVE DATE T/C PURCHASE O REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION BALANCE 302-4110-0000-001-30241100000001 - MARGERIE RESERVOIR TRAIL 720.08 IMPROVEMENTS .00 .00 .00 BEGINNING BALANCE 07/01/23 13-1 2,284,000.00 DEEP GRANT 2022-241 10/12/23 11-4 .00 10/17/23 17-4 24000536-01 00108 HEARST MEDIA SER 313.45 2796206-09072023 LEGAL NO 10/19/23 21-4 24000536-01 111979 00108 HEARST MEDIA SER 313.45 -313.45 2796206-09072023 LEGAL NO 02/15/24 17-8 24000656-01 91328 SYDNEY A. RAPP L 54,000.00 PART 1 - TOPOGRAPHIC SURV 02/15/24 17-8 24000656-02 91328 SYDNEY A. RAPP L 15,250.00 PART 2 - WETLAND DELINEAT 04/09/24 18-10 24000536-01 00108 HEARST MEDIA SER 272.00 CHANGE ORDER - 1 04/11/24 21-10 24000536-01 112980 00108 HEARST MEDIA SER 271.80 -271.80 2834375-03162024 09/04/24 21-13 24000536-01 00108 HEARST MEDIA SER .00 - .20 2796206-09072023 LEGAL NO TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS 2,284,000.00 585.25 69,250.00 2,214,164.75 TOTAL REPORT 2,284,000.00 585.25 69,250.00 2,214,164.75 * THERE IS A NOTE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION  1B: Progress Report #6 DRAFT Grantee/Contractor Name: New Fairfield Contract No: 2023-241 Project ID: DEPA00030202707 and DEPA00030202809 Contract Value: $2,284,000 Contract End Date: 8/12/2027 Project Summary # 6. Reporting Period: February 13, 2025 through August 12, 2025 Supporting Narrative – Progress on Planned Activities – (2 pages) 1. Work Completed: The Margerie Trail Advisory Committee (Committee) met In September, December and January. Below is what was accomplished at each meeting. Included with the narration of this report is a spreadsheet showing project expenditures during that period. • March 25,2025. The meeting began with public comment. Barton and Loguidice (B&L), the design consultant for the project, reported that the inline survey received 514 responses, 177 map comments, mostly from New Fairfield residents age 45+. It was reported that B&L is in the process of creating a proposed trail route alignment based on online data: Connection to other activities and dog park, safety while walking the trail is a concern due to high traffic nearby, privacy, connection from trail to sidewalks along Route 7, vegetation buffer to help with privacy. There will also be an eagle nest buffer zone, existing stone walls will be avoided, grading and/or boardwalk in wetland areas. Committee member Day asked about DEEPs input on the eagle nest. Mr. Grindle of B&L confirmed that the DEEP expert believes the trail will not make a significant impact in comparison to the disruption Route 37 already has on the nest area. Mr. Grindle also confirmed the water mitigation is on their radar. Member Iadarola asked about adding tags to the map; he noted concerns with the flood line; and he asked about the grading plan that affected the location of the path and the boardwalk plan; Mr. Grindle suggested PVC construction for longevity. Member Iadarola also asked about addressing dead trees during the construction. Mr. Grindle confirmed for Member Day that the length of the trail is 2 miles and the boardwalk portion would be 1,300 linear ft. B&L Invoice # 11079 ($8,040) – A motion was made by Member Gucker, seconded by Member Iadarola, to approve the invoice from B&L Invoice #11079. Motion carried unanimously. • On June 17. The meeting began with public comments. The Committee formally approved B&L invoice #10763 for $8040 which had not been included in the minutes for previous meetings. 1  The Committee also approved B&L invoice # 11307 for $ 26,132. A discussion followed on how to accelerate invoice payments, which have been slow. Mr. Grindle of B&L showed a PowerPoint of the proposed trail route and features. He also discussed the walk through that was conducted with Mr. Hess of the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. He said the PowerPoint will be added to the trail website. Mr. Day asked about guaranteeing the safety of the reservoir. Chair Robinson presented the schedule of future meetings. The committee then entered into executive session to discuss the proposed trail plan. 2. Total Funds expended to date: $ 585.25 Funds expended in current reporting period $ 271.80 to Hearst Media. Signature _______________________________ Date _________ 2 2 (updated 8/19/25)  MARGERIE RESERVOIR TRAIL FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ) (As of August 6, 2025) 1. PROJECT FUNDING & SUPPORT Q.​ Who is paying for the current study of the reservoir’s suitability for a multiuse trail? A. ​ Neither the City of Danbury nor the Town of New Fairfield are paying for the current study. The planning and design phase is funded by a $2.28 million State of Connecticut grant dedicated solely to feasibility, permitting, and environmental review; these dollars cannot be spent on unrelated city or town expenses. It is funded through a State of Connecticut grant specifically for trail feasibility and planning (Urban Development Act Grant). Q.​ Which elected officials have supported the trail study? A.​ Since the concept of a reservoir trail was first proposed, elected officials from both political parties and multiple administrations have supported feasibility studies, including: ●​ Former Danbury Mayor Mark Boughton ●​ Current Danbury Mayor Roberto Alves ●​ Former State Senator Michael McLachlan ●​ Former State Representative Stephen Smith ●​ Former State Representative Rachel Chaleski ●​ Current State Representatives Ken Gucker and Pat Callahan ●​ Former New Fairfield First Selectmen Susan Chapman and Pat Del Monico ●​ Former New Fairfield Selectman Khris Hall ●​ Former Danbury City Council President Vinny DiGilio ●​ Current Danbury Councilwoman Holly Robinson ​ In addition, the concept of regional trail connectivity is: ●​ Supported in both the Danbury and New Fairfield Plans of Conservation and Development (POCD); and ●​ Endorsed by the Western Connecticut Council of Governments (WestCOG) (Danbury POCD 2023, New Fairfield POCD 2021, WestCOG 2024). Q.​ Is there business support for the trail? A.​ In addition to individual business owners, the Greater Danbury Chamber of Commerce confirms its support of the trail, stating “[f]rom an economic perspective, trails like this can improve the performance and visibility of nearby businesses, particularly those in retail, food service…..and generate sustained foot traffic, encourage “stop-in” commerce, and create the kind of active, connected downtown that draws both residents and visitors. In essence, they help convert pass-through activity into local spending. In addition, connectivity and walkability are consistently ranked as top community amenities, fostering a sense of place, encouraging investment, and supporting workforce retention by enhancing the day-to-day experience of those living and working in the community.” 2. THE MARGERIE RESERVOIR TRAIL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (MRTAC) Q. What is the Margerie Reservoir Trail Advisory Committee (MRTAC)? A.​ MRTAC is a joint committee formed by the City of Danbury and the Town of New Fairfield. It serves in an advisory capacity only; it cannot approve or fund construction. Its purpose is to evaluate engineering, environmental, and public-input data and then issue a recommendation to elected officials. 3. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Q.​ What public input has shaped the design? A.​ Public engagement has included: ●​ 15+ committee meetings since 2022, each offering public comment. ●​ A six-week online interactive map for public feedback, which generated 500 responses and 177 geo-pinned comments. ●​ Adjustments to trail routing and design based on public input, including vegetative screening near residences and sensitive environmental areas (Project Public Engagement Summary 2025). See Appendix A: Comprehensive Public Engagement Summary for more information 4. TRAIL COSTS & MAINTENANCE Q.​ What will the trail cost to construct? A.​ The exact cost depends on final design and materials. Preliminary estimates are expected by the end of summer 2025. Funding sources include the $2.28 million Urban  Development Act grant, other state/federal grants, philanthropic donations, and corporate sponsorships (CT DOT Trail Funding Program). Q.​ How much will it cost taxpayers to maintain the trail? A. ​ Maintenance costs vary by design but are generally low. The trail will be on City of Danbury property, and the City plans to pursue grant funding and partnerships for upkeep. Trails similar in length and usage in Connecticut typically cost $2,000–$4,000 annually per mile for maintenance (Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, 2022). For the proposed 2-mile Margerie Reservoir Trail, a conservative estimate for annual maintenance is approximately $10,000. Even if Danbury were to fund the full amount (without considering any volunteer, sponsorships, grant funding, etc.), the cost would be around 11-22 cents per taxpayer per year. 5. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Q.​ Will the trail endanger bald eagles? A. ​ No. The proposed trail alignment is outside the recommended federal buffer for nesting eagles, except where it runs adjacent to Route 37, where over 11,000 vehicles per day already travel without disturbing the nest (CTDOT traffic counts, CT DEEP Bald Eagle Management Guidelines). The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (CT DEEP) visited the site and has no objections to the alignment. Construction will be timed to avoid the nesting period and will use low-impact methods (no heavy equipment near the nest). Educational signage will also promote eagle protection. See Appendix B: Focus on Eagle Protection for more information Q.​ What about other wildlife and wetlands? A. ​ The route was designed to avoid wetlands whenever possible. Where crossings are necessary, elevated boardwalks will be used to maintain wetland function. The CT Natural Diversity Database shows no endangered or threatened species within the project area. If any are identified during permitting, additional protections will be implemented as required by law (CT Natural Diversity Database 2024). 6. PROPERTY & PRIVACY CONCERNS Q.​ How close will the trail be to condominiums? A. ​ The trail alignment keeps at least 100 feet from the nearest condo building and significantly more in most areas. Dense vegetative screening is included in the design for privacy (Trail Concept Plans 2025). Q.​ Will the trail bring strangers “into people’s backyards”? A.​ The trail is on City of Danbury-owned land, not private property. Public access to municipal land is a legal right and common practice statewide. Screening and fencing options are being considered where necessary (CT General Statutes § 7-148). 7. SAFETY & SECURITY Q.​ Will crime increase? A. ​ Studies consistently show that trails do not increase crime and, in some cases, reduce it because more eyes are present (Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, 2022). Local trails in both Danbury and New Fairfield have no significant crime incidents. National research shows crime either decreases or remains unchanged after a trail opens; one multi-state study found adjacent neighborhoods experienced a 10% drop in property crime. Additionally: ●​ The trail is expected to have regular pedestrian activity, deterring crime. ●​ It is visible from Route 37. ●​ Mile markers and emergency access points are built into the design. Q.​ How will medical emergencies be handled? A. ​ The entire route has cell coverage. Emergency vehicle access is available at two locations: from the south via the Danbury Dog Park entrance on Bear Mountain Road and from the north via the reservoir access road on Route 37 (North Street). Mile markers will be installed along the trail to help emergency responders quickly identify and access incident locations (PROJECT SAFETY PLAN 2025). Trail mile-markers and two gated access points allow EMS to reach any location quickly. 8. PARKING & USE Q.​ Where will people park? A.​ Most anticipated users are local residents—including school cross-country teams and Senior Center members—who can walk to the trail. Limited parking areas are being studied for occasional visitors, but daily use is expected to be neighborhood-based (User Demand Study 2025). 9. WATER QUALITY & RESERVOIR PROTECTION Q.​ Will the trail pollute the reservoir? A. ​ The trail design follows best management practices (BMPs) for stormwater and erosion control. The drainage plan may actually improve conditions by capturing and treating runoff that currently flows from Route 37 directly toward the reservoir. In fact, it may improve water quality by providing new drainage features to redirect roadway runoff from Route 37, a current pollutant source (EPA Stormwater BMP Manual). Q.​ Could the water supply be poisoned? A.​ The trail will increase passive surveillance (more eyes on the area), reducing illegal dumping risks. The Connecticut Department of Public Health encourages access trails around reservoirs when properly designed and managed (CT DPH Drinking Water Division Guidance). 10. COMMUNITY BENEFITS Q.​ What are the benefits of the trail? A.​ Numerous studies demonstrate benefits, including: ●​ Nearby homes typically gain 4–7% in value; Brookfield homes near the Still River Greenway rose by up to $50,000. ●​ Public health: Trails promote exercise, reducing healthcare costs (CDC Healthy Community Design Initiative). ●​ Education: Opportunities for environmental field trips and outdoor learning. ●​ Local economy: Trails typically boost nearby small businesses by 5–10% due to increased foot traffic (Rails-to-Trails Conservancy Economic Impact Studies). ●​ Community connection: A safe space for social interaction and events. 11. CLARIFYING CONCERNS Q.​ Why do some residents oppose the trail? A. ​ Community feedback has raised thoughtful concerns about privacy, wildlife protection, potential safety issues, and long-term impacts—many of which are understandable given the scale and visibility of the project. Some of these concerns stem from uncertainty or incomplete information, which is common in the early stages of a public planning process. The City of Danbury and the project team are committed to addressing questions openly and respectfully. To support this, an active project website includes: ●​ Current plans ●​ Meeting notes ●​ Eagle protection information ●​ Project schedules ●​ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)  ​ We encourage all residents to review the latest materials and submit feedback at: (https://bartonloguidice.mysocialpinpoint.com/margerie-reservoir-trail/margerie-trail or https://tinyurl.com/MargerieTrail). REFERENCES ●​ USFWS Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (2007) - https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/national-bald-eagle-management-g uidelines_0.pdf ●​ CT DEEP Bald Eagle Management Guidelines – https://portal.ct.gov/DEEP/Wildlife/Fact-Sheets/Bald-Eagle ●​ Rails-to-Trails Conservancy (Crime, Economic, and Maintenance Studies) – https://www.railstotrails.org/ ●​ Connecticut DOT Traffic Counts for Route 37 – https://portal.ct.gov/DOT/Performance/Traffic-Data ●​ Connecticut Natural Diversity Database (CT DEEP NDDB 2025)– https://portal.ct.gov/DEEP/EndangeredSpecies/Natural-Diversity-Data-Base ●​ CDC Healthy Community Design Initiative – https://www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/ ●​ National Association of Realtors – https://www.nar.realtor/research-and-statistics ●​ CT DPH Drinking Water Division – https://portal.ct.gov/DPH/Drinking-Water ●​ EPA Stormwater BMP Manual – https://www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater AUTHORSHIP Prepared collaboratively by the Margerie Reservoir Trail Advisory Committee (MRTAC), design consultants from Barton & Loguidice, and other subject matter experts and stakeholders. It is intended as a good-faith effort to inform the public and foster continued transparency. APPENDIX A: COMPREHENSIVE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY ​ This summary documents all public engagement, transparency efforts, and community responsiveness by the Margerie Reservoir Trail Advisory Committee (MRTAC) during its advisory review of a proposed multi-use trail along the Margerie Reservoir corridor between Danbury and New Fairfield, Connecticut. COMMITTEE STRUCTURE & TRANSPARENCY ●​ Advisory-only body created to assess trail feasibility; does not approve or fund construction ●​ 15 public meetings held (Dec 2022 – July 2025) ●​ Committee meetings noticed and recorded per FOIA and public meeting rules ●​ Rotating meeting locations between New Fairfield and Danbury to ensure accessibility for both communities ●​ Minutes taken and posted for all meetings; several included audio/video recordings ●​ FOIA requests received and formally addressed in public session ●​ Corporation Counsel present at most meetings to ensure compliance with public records and process obligations PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES & PARTICIPATION ●​ Public comment offered at nearly every meeting, often at beginning ●​ Over 100 public comments across meetings (residents, town leaders, business owners, stakeholders) ●​ Written comments submitted and read into the record at multiple meetings ●​ Committee members met with condo residents to hear property-specific concerns ●​ Chair and committee encouraged all speakers to raise new concerns while affirming respect for repeated input ●​ Public speakers included senior citizens, cross-country coaches, parents, homeowners, commissioners, and state/local officials ONLINE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT ●​ Project-specific website launched and maintained by consultant Barton & Loguidice (B&L) ●​ Website hosted trail maps, comment portal, survey, and updates ●​ Public Survey: 514 responses, 177 map-based comments ●​ Respondents were primarily New Fairfield residents, mostly aged 45+ ●​ Strong majority (~80%) expressed support for the trail MEDIA & PUBLIC NOTICE ●​ News-Times article (Jan 18, 2025): 'Planners Seek Feedback on Plan: Safe Link' ●​ Town Tribune article (Jan 23, 2025): 'MRTAC Seeks Your Input' with full-color trail map ●​ Newspaper ads: Town Tribune ($230), News-Times print+digital ($1,100) ●​ Public notice postings coordinated with both New Fairfield and Danbury municipalities REVISIONS BASED ON PUBLIC INPUT ●​ Trail alignment adjusted to increase distance from Lakewood Condos ●​ Vegetative buffers and screening berms added for privacy ●​ Adjustments made to avoid stone walls and wetlands ●​ Safety, fencing, lighting, and water concerns reviewed and integrated into RFP ●​ Public input themes directly incorporated into consultant scope WILDLIFE PROTECTION & ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ●​ April 25, 2025: Site walk conducted with CT DEEP Wildlife Biologist Brian Hess ●​ Nest observed; no distress noted; DEEP endorsed current trail alignment ●​ Construction to be phased to avoid nesting season ●​ Environmental Impact Assessment included in design scope DESIGN CONSULTANT ENGAGEMENT ●​ Open RFP process conducted; B&L selected unanimously ●​ B&L attended public meetings, presented options, and revised plans based on input ●​ Committed to public updates MEETINGS & MILESTONES ●​ Dec 2022 – Jul 2025: 15 public meetings held ●​ Jan–Feb 2024: Committee restructured with new chair ●​ Jan–Feb 2025: Public survey launched ●​ Apr 25, 2025: DEEP eagle nest walk ●​ Jul 22, 2025: Final major public meeting before recommendation ●​ Aug 19, 2025: Final report to be submitted FINAL NOTES ●​ 2.5 years of structured public engagement ●​ Committee listened, documented, and responded to concerns ●​ Plans revised with expert and public input ●​ Process exceeded public input standards for feasibility studies APPENDIX B: FOCUS ON EAGLE PROTECTION Since early in the Margerie Reservoir Trail planning process, MRTAC has prioritized the protection of wildlife, particularly the active bald eagle nest located near the proposed trail corridor. To ensure responsible planning and regulatory compliance, the committee worked closely with the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (CT DEEP), specifically with Wildlife Biologist Brian Hess of CT DEEP’s Wildlife Division. Brian Hess is a seasoned wildlife biologist with CT DEEP and is an expert on raptors, including bald eagles. His role at CT DEEP includes overseeing eagle monitoring efforts, coordinating with federal agencies such as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and advising municipalities and developers on best practices for minimizing impacts to sensitive species and habitats. Mr. Hess has conducted field research and public education around raptor conservation and has written and spoken extensively about the post-DDT bald eagle recovery in Connecticut. On April 25, 2025, Mr. Hess conducted an in-person site walk with members of the Advisory Committee and consultants from Barton & Loguidice (B&L). The walkthrough assessed the location of the active eagle nest in relation to the proposed trail alignment. During the site visit, an adult eagle and at least two eaglets were observed in the nest through a spotting scope. He noted that while the nest is located within the 330-foot primary buffer zone recommended for nesting bald eagles, the proposed trail alignment runs adjacent to Route 37 — a pre-existing state highway that already introduces disturbance in the area that is tolerated by the eagles. Mr. Hess stated that because the trail will be constructed along this corridor and because the scope of the disturbance from the trail will be similar to the disturbance of the roadway, impact on the nesting pair would be minimal. He expressed appreciation for the committee’s sensitivity to wildlife concerns and stated he had no objection to the proposed alignment. Importantly, Mr. Hess committed to providing technical assistance and coordination with both CT DEEP and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Based on Mr. Hess’s observations and guidance, the committee and design consultant have included the following protective measures into the trail planning and RFP scope: - Phased construction schedule to avoid bald eagle nesting and fledging seasons (typically January through July). - Installation of physical barriers (e.g., fencing, natural screening) near the eagle nest area to discourage off-trail wandering and provide additional visual screening between trail users and the eagles. - Use of educational signage about bald eagle conservation and federal protections. - Monitoring of nesting activity in partnership with CT DEEP throughout the construction and post-construction period. - Avoidance of loud construction activities or mechanized equipment near the nest during critical months. - Routing adjustments made during design development to maximize distance from the nest and minimize visibility. These measures were designed in accordance with both CT DEEP and USFWS recommendations for nest protection under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. The committee remains in regular contact with DEEP and is committed to modifying any construction or operational plans if eagle nesting behavior changes or if new nests are identified. MRTAC would like to express its gratitude to Brian Hess and the Wildlife Division of CT DEEP for their expertise, transparency, and collaboration in protecting this iconic species while supporting thoughtful recreational development. POWERSCHOOL PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 07/28/2025 TOWN OF NEW FAIRFIELD AUDIT21 TIME: 09:23:01 EXPENDITURE AUDIT TRAIL SELECTION CRITERIA: orgn.fund='302' and orgn.orgn1 like '4110%' and expledgr.account='720.08' ACCOUNTING PERIODS: 1/25 THRU 8/25 SORTED BY: FUND,DEPARTMENT,ACCOUNT TOTALED ON: PAGE BREAKS ON: FUND - 302 - TOWN CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET UNIT - 30241100000001 - MARGERIE RESERVOIR TRAIL ACCOUNT CUMULATIVE DATE T/C PURCHASE O REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION BALANCE 302-4110-0000-001-30241100000001 - MARGERIE RESERVOIR TRAIL 720.08 IMPROVEMENTS .00 .00 .00 BEGINNING BALANCE 07/01/24 13-1 2,214,164.75 FY24 AVAILABLE BUDGET 07/01/24 13-1 .00 07/22/24 11-1 .00 POSTED FROM BUDGET SYSTEM 09/04/24 13-1 54,000.00 PRIOR YR ENCUM-E4000656 09/04/24 13-1 15,250.00 PRIOR YR ENCUM-E4000656 09/04/24 17-1 24000656-01 91328 SYDNEY A. RAPP L 54,000.00 ENC CARRY FRWRD-E4000656 09/04/24 17-1 24000656-02 91328 SYDNEY A. RAPP L 15,250.00 ENC CARRY FRWRD-E4000656 11/22/24 21-5 24000656-01 113954 91328 SYDNEY A. RAPP L 54,000.00 -54,000.00 PART 1 - TOPOGRAPHIC SURV 11/22/24 21-5 24000656-02 113954 91328 SYDNEY A. RAPP L 15,250.00 -15,250.00 PART 2 - WETLAND DELINEAT 02/03/25 17-8 25000598-01 91689 BARTON & LOGUIDI 266,260.00 COMPREHENSIVE DESIGN SERV 02/03/25 17-8 25000599-01 19297 TOWN TRIBUNE 230.00 MARGERIE TRAIL SURVEY AD 02/03/25 17-8 25000600-01 00108 HEARST MEDIA SER 1,062.00 MARGERIE TRAIL ADVISORY S 02/05/25 21-8 25000598-01 114179 91689 BARTON & LOGUIDI 28,140.00 -28,140.00 INV. 10726 02/05/25 21-8 25000598-01 114179 91689 BARTON & LOGUIDI 32,160.00 -32,160.00 INV.10336 12/04/24 02/24/25 21-8 25000600-01 V1225 00108 HEARST MEDIA SER 500.00 -500.00 2898263-01312025 TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS 2,283,414.75 130,050.00 206,752.00 1,946,612.75 TOTAL REPORT 2,283,414.75 130,050.00 206,752.00 1,946,612.75 * THERE IS A NOTE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION