City Council

CITY OF DANBURY 155 DEER HILL AVENUE DANBURY, CONNECTICUT 06810 www.danbury-ct.gov ELISA ETCHETO PHONE: 203-797-4514 LEGISLATIVE ASSISTANT FAX: 203-796-1529 e.etcheto@danbury-ct.gov SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOTICE Who: City Council members When: 6:30 P.M. – Thursday, July 23, 2026 Where: City Council Chambers 3rd Fl, City Hall, 155 Deer Hill Avenue Purpose: Special Meeting of the City Council *Agenda Item on file in the Legislative Assistant’s Office and on the City website. Posted: Town Clerk Information Board City Website  SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL THURSDAY, JULY 23, 2026 The meeting will be called to order at 6:30 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE & PRAYER ROLL CALL PRESENT ABSENT NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING There will be a Special Meeting of the City Council on Thursday, July 23, 2026 at 6:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers in City Hall to act on the items below. ACCEPTANCE OF CALL TO SERVICE PUBLIC SPEAKING AGENDA 1. REPORTS - Public Hearing & Committee of the Whole Parts I, II & III: Charter Revision – Draft Report ADJOURNMENT Copies of Agenda Items are available in the Legislative Assistant’s Office and on the City’s website.  PUBLIC HEARING Charter Revision – Draft Report July 16, 2026 – 7pm Call To Order: Council President P. Buzaid called the Public Hearing to order at 7: 10p.m. Roll Call: COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Coelho, Flanagan, Hawley, LaPine, Salvatore, Buzaid, Gartner, Fay, Henry, Wallace-Smith, Spain-Reichl, Giordano, Rotello, Chianese, Duane Perkins, McAllister, Britton, Robinson, Laughinghouse, Dennis Perkins, Jabbour. COUNCIL MEMBER/S ABSENT: Council Member Jabbour arrived at 7:29pm. PRESENT: 21, ABSENT: 0 ALSO PRESENT FROM THE CITY: Dan Casagrande, Corporation Counsel; Joseph Mortellti, Outside Counsel and Legal Counsel to the Charter Revision Commission. NOTICE: Council President P. Buzaid read the meeting notice. PUBLIC SPEAKERS: Council President P. Buzaid opened Public Speaking. Roberto Alves, Resident & Mayor, 7 West Redding Road – Spoke regarding the process and the opportunities for the public to speak. Asked that voters have the opportunity to vote on these amendments, and stated that a No vote takes away the residents’ opportunity to vote on the document. Jan Marie Jagush, Resident, Coach Hill Drive – Spoke in favor of the changes to modernize the document, supports 4-year terms, appointing the Town Clerk, Increasing the bonding threshold to reflect today’s costs. Melody Derike, Resident, 15 Westview Dr. – Discussed safety concerns in the City. Ellen Cooke, Resident, 56 Sandpit Rd. – Spoke in favor sending the amendments to the voters, 4 year terms, the Town Clerk as a Civil Service position. Ashley Phan, Resident, William St. – Discussed concerns with accountability, language regarding the Chief of Staff position; asked that the Charter continue to be reviewed and amended. Karen Palanzo, Resident, 27 Middle River Road – Expressed concerns with the rushed process and pre- set agenda of proposed changes. Spoke regarding the need to add a Board of Ethics section. Ray McGarrigal, Resident, 41 East Gate Rd. – Asked for transparency in finances and spending, and to let the voters decide. Mary Tahan, Resident, 1 East Hayestown Rd. – Asked that the Council approve the work that has been done by the Commission, supports a reclassification of the Town Clerk to Appointed and asked that the voters have a say. Paul Bomba, Resident, 3 Crestdale Drive – Supports the work that has been done and asked that the Council allow the public to vote on the revised Charter. George Olochley, Resident, 13 Maple Ridge Rd – Spoke in favor of 4 year terms; has concerns with the BOE spending and believes the Council should have access to their finances; supports the reclassification of the Town Clerk based on experience; asked that the voters be able to vote on the changes. Henry Hall, Resident, 6 Flirtation Drive – Asked that the changes be presented to the voters. Keegan Williamson Resident, 43 Saddle Rock Rd. – Supports the changes to allow for more efficiency and asked that the voters have the opportunity to vote on the changes. Lynn Waller, Resident, Highland Ave. – Explained concerns with the process and that the Commission did not address recommended changes; provided a list of concerns and changes: BOE 4 year terms should be staggered; Town Clerk should be a Civil Service position or Elected; Legislative Assistant should be chosen by the Council; Reapportionment fifth member should not be chosen by the Mayor; a referendum requiring 10% is too high; asked that the Elderly Dept keep its name. Lorraine Burger, Resident, Southern Blvd. – Discussed concerns with no changes to the revisions and recommendations were not addressed; spoke against 4 Year Terms; believes there should be term limits for the Mayor; concerns with increasing the bon amounts without a referendum; concerns with centralizing powers. Kate Conetta, Resident, 4 Topfield Rd. – Spoke about concerns with the new BOE language due to city oversight, the use of the word Shall, possible access by the city to private data. Elvis Nova, 4 Stetson Place – Spoke in favor of the revisions to reflect the changes in our community including 4 year terms; and for the voters to have the final say. Jim LaPine, Resident, 14 Lily Drive – Discussed the importance of the Town Clerk and supports reclassifying the position to allow for continuity. Randall Michael, Resident, Juniper Ridge Dr. – Spoke in favor of the changes including 4 year terms; and asked that the Council move the Charter forward so that the voters can have a say. Debbie Rizzo, Resident, 46 Ole Musket Lane- Spoke against the appointment of the Town Clerk and supports Civil Service; is against 4 year terms; noted concerns with the rushed process of the Commission. Michelle Coelho, Resident, 47 East Lake Rd. – Expressed concerns with the process of Charter Revision; spoke regarding 2 year terms for the BOE to allow voters to have a say more often; an appointed Finance administrator that is not accountable to the people. Irving Fox, Resident, 10 Clapboard Ridge Road – Discussed the importance of keep the BOE terms staggered to allow new members to learn how things work from senior members in case there is a widespread change to the board. John Cooke, Resident, 152 South king St. – Spoke in favor of 4 year terms for efficiency; Supports financial review of the BOE; and supports making the Town Clerk an appointed position. ‘ Natalie M., Resident, 136 Pembroke Rd. – Asked that the Council reject the Charter changes. Eva Alveida, 3 Crane Street – Spoke regarding longer terms and the reclassification of the Town Clerk, and asked that the voters have a say. Rob Melillo, Resident, Lois St. - Read a letter from former Town Clerk, Jan Giegler – Spoke in favor of keeping the Town Clerk as an elected position to allow for voter accountability; spoke against 4 year terms; Legislative Assistant should be hired and dismissed by the legislative body; vacancies appointed by the Mayor should still require Council appointment; noted the remove of section…. Employees should have reassurances. Paul McAllister, Resident - Read a letter from Warren Levy, Resident, Pilgrim Dr. – Asked that the Council vote no on the proposed draft due to the inexperience of the Commission members and conflicts of interests; noted the rushed process and that comments were rarely addressed; expressed concerns with concentrated authority. Mark Stanton, Resident, 6 Tanglewood Drive – Spoke in favor of 4 year terms and the time it takes to learn a position and to be good at it. Gary Simone, Resident, 5 Dogwood Drive – Expressed his support of the Charter changes; addressed concerns with minority representation and asked the Council to address this subject. Denise Minson, Resident, 93 Park Ave. – Supports 4 year terms; asked for term limits; supports the Town Clerk as being a civil service position. Joan Bielizna, Resident, 179 Kohanza St. – Supports 4 year term for the Mayor to allow the individual to learn the job and to save money on elections every 2 years; spoke in favor of the City reviewing the BOE finances; asked that the voters be allowed to decide. Kathleen Troy, Resident, 92 Park Ave. – Noted the work that the Commission put into the process; and acknowledged that the document will never be perfect but the voters should have a chance to vote on the changes; spoke in favor of a 4 year term. Larry Riefberg, Resident, 6 Erving Drive – Addressed comments regarding the process and membership of the Commission; asked the Council to allow the voters to decide on the revisions. Ed Vachovetz, Resident, Thaddeus Ave. – Asked that the Council continue to review the Charter and to take the time to look over the proposed changes. Farley Santos, Resident, 27 West View Dr. – Asked that the Council allow the voters to have a say on the revisions; spoke to the opportunities for public participation throughout the process. Al Robinson, Resident, 7 Melrose Ave – Discussed the Charter Revision process and the Council’s opportunity to make recommendations to the Commission; he noted concerns with the rushed process. Asked if the Chair of the Charter Revision Commission had discussions previous or outside of the presence of the Commission. Jennifer Dorin, Resident & Assistant Town Clerk, Long Ridge Rd. – Discussed concerns with the new language regarding the Town Clerk position and constant change if the position is elected and appointed; asked that the position be hired to prevent an administration from removing a Town Clerk. Council President P. Buzaid closed public comment. A motion was made by Council member Chainese, seconded by Council member Rotello, to close the public hearing. The Motion Carried Unanimously. ADJOURNMENT: A motion was made by Council member Wallace-Smith, seconded by Council member Gartner, to adjourn. The Motion Carried Unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 8:42 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Elisa Etcheto, Legislative Assistant.  COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Charter Revision – Draft Report July 16, 2026 – 6:30pm Call To Order: Council President P. Buzaid called the Public Hearing to order at 6:36 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance: Council member McAllister led the Pledge of Allegiance. Roll Call: COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Coelho, Flanagan, LaPine, Buzaid, Gartner, Fay, Henry, Wallace- Smith, Spain-Reichl, Giordano, Jabbour*, Robinson, Hawley, Salvatore, Rotello, Chianese, Duane Perkins, McAllister, Britton, Laughinghouse, Dennis Perkins COUNCIL MEMBER/S ABSENT: Jabbour arrived at 6:49pm PRESENT: 21, ABSENT: 0 ALSO PRESENT FROM THE CITY: Dan Casagrande, Corporation Counsel; Joseph Mortellti, Outside Counsel and Legal Counsel to the Charter Revision Commission. NOTICE: Council President P. Buzaid read the meeting notice; and explained the Committee of the Whole purpose, and a chapter by chapter review process. A motion was made by Councilman Salvatore, 2nd by Council Member Chianese, to approve your (Council President’s) outline of the agenda to handle the Charter Revision recommendations chapter by chapter. Yes -19, No - 1 (Rotello). Motion Carried Main Motion: A motion was made by Council Member Salvatore, 2nd by Council Member Gartner to Approve the recommended changes from the Charter Revision Commission in the Preamble and Chapter 1, as amended. Motion Carried. Council Member Henry asked that Taxpayer be added to the preamble. Council Member Hawley asked why Town was still in the preamble; Mr. Mortelliti noted that there is no reason to keep the word. Council Member Rotello asked if adding citizen and resident is the only change to the preamble; Mr. Mortelliti confirmed it is the only change. Council Member Rotello asked how the “decision making” process would function; Mr. Mortellti noted that discussion did not get that specific. Council Member Chianese asked about the vagueness of adding “resident”, does this include non- residents being on local boards and commissions, voting in referendums; Mr. Mortellti noted that the legality of the word was not discussed, but was an aspirational intent. Council Member Duane Perkins asked if the term Taxpayer would replace a term; Mr. Mortellti noted that the Commission did not suggest the word and that the Council would have to decide if it should be added and where. Council Member Henry asked to amend the red-lined draft report to reflect the word taxpayer. Council Member Chianese asked for clarification of where the word would go. Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Henry, seconded by Council Member Coelho, to amend the Preamble in Part 1, Chapter 1, specific to the red-lined draft report to add the word taxpayer, to be included. Yes – 12, No – 9 (LaPine, Salvatore, Buzaid, Gartner, Spain Reichl, Gordano, Jabbour, Britton, McAllister). Motion Carried Council President Buzaid clarified that the suggested amendment language would be: “We believe in the right of every citizen, resident, and taxpayer.” Council Member Henry confirmed. Council Member Flanagan asked if adding Taxpayer would affect the rest of the Charter; Mr. Mortellti spoke to the general language of the Preamble that would not conflict with other sections. Council Member Hawley asked if this would be considered a substantive change; Mr. Mortellti noted that this is a recommendation and the classification of the change is not relevant. Council Members LaPine and Jabbour expressed concern with adding the term if no additional changes are made in the rest of the document. Council Member Rotello noted that the City allows taxpayers to participate in some ways and adding the language would just codify that, it would not change their rights such as voting in a city they do not live in. A motion was made by Council Member Rotello to Call the Question. Yes – 19, No – 2 (Chianese, Duane Perkins). Motion Carried. Council Member Henry asked for a Roll Call Vote. _________________ Candace Fay asked if it is appropriate for Council Member Britton to vote; Council Member Buzaid confirmed that Council Member Britton can vote. Back to the Main Motion. COW recessed at 7:04pm. COW Reconvened at 8:59pm Main Motion: A motion was made by Council Member Salvatore, 2nd by Council Member Gartner, to approve the recommended changes from the Charter Revision Commission on Chapter 2. Council Member Rotello asked for a point of order to confirm that the Council addressed Chapter 1; that was confirmed. Council Member Henry asked to amend language in Section 2-4 Reapportionment Wards and Voting Districts. Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Henry, 2nd by Council Member Chianese, to remove the language “Mayor Shall Appoint”, and keep “Unaffiliated voter appointed and approved by the City Council” No - , Yes - 8 (Coelho, Fay, Henry, Spain-Reichl, Rotello, Chianese, Duane Perkins, Dennis Perkins). Motion failed. Council Member Chianese concerned with the amendment because it does not specify how the 5th person will be selected and presented to the Council. Council Member Robinson suggested that the appointment by the Mayor would solve concerns addressed by Member Chianese. Council Member Chianese asked that the language be reviewed again by the Charter Revision Commission. Council Member Gartner supports the original language. Council Member Rotello suggested that the 5th member be approved by the Council and supports the amendment. Council Member Duane Perkins agrees with the amendment to remove the Mayor’s political influence on the selection; however, he asked how the Council would select the candidates, and asked if the Commission discussed the possibility of appointing an Independent Party representative; Mr. Mortelliti noted that there was extensive discussion regarding the appointment of a fifth member, and some alternatives were discussed. Council Member Jabbour noted that the amendment would require additional parameters and leaves more un answered questions. Council Member LaPine asked that the proposed language remain. Council Member Fay asked that the Commission consider the amendment and allow the Commission to make changes if deemed necessary. Council Member Wallace-Smith spoke in favor of leaving the language as presented due to unanswered questions. Council Member Laughinghouse noted that the revisions includes amended language that no longer requires a unanimous decision to confirm a fifth member. Council Member Rotello spoke to the politics behind choosing a fifth member. Council Member Fay spoke to the Council’s historical approval of the Mayor’s appointments. Council Member Gartner explained that this does address a problem. Council Member Robinson asked for clarification of the amendment and its intent. Council Member Salvatore clarified how recommendations made by the Council at the Committee of the Whole will proceed to the Commission for review. Council Member Salvatore spoke against the amendment due to the vagueness of what the process would be if amended, and noted the removal of the unanimous vote requirement. Council Member Giordano supports keeping the proposed language. Council Member Chianese supports the amendment to allow the Council to have a say. Council Member Henry asked for a Roll Call Vote. _____________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Jabbour, 2nd by Council Member Rotello, to amend the language from Appointed to Nominated. Yes – 20, No – 1 (LaPine). Motion Carried. ______________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Fay, 2nd by Council Member Rotello, to amend the proposed language to reflect that the Mayor serve a term of 2 years not 4 years. No – 14, Yes – 6 (Coelho, Fay, Henry, Rotello, Duane Perkins, Dennis Perkins), Abstention – 1 (Chainese). Motion Failed. Council Member Chianese asked if there was discussion regarding the removal of a mayor if there is a reason to do so; Mr. Motellti confirmed that pros and cons were discussed, however, removal was not addressed in detail. Council Member Chianese asked that legal Counsel provide state statute that addresses the removal of a mayor; Mr. Casagrande noted that the Council could ask that a removal clause be added by the Commission. Council Member Robinson asked for confirmation that the Council can address some changes to the proposed Charter in separate questions to the voters; Council President Buzaid confirmed the Council can decide on multiple questions to be presented to the voters. Council Member Rotello expressed concerns with changing the term lengths and supports 2-year terms, and is against term limits. Council Member Jabbour supports the voters being able to vote on 4-year terms and supports 4-year terms. Council Member Coelho asked what would happen if the Mayor leaves office before the term is done; Council President Buzaid confirmed that the Charter states that the Council President would complete the term; Coelho stated that he is against 4-year terms. Council Member Gartner supports a 4-year term to attract better candidates; and urges the Council to allow the public to vote on the change that is split among residents based on their comments during the public hearings. Council Member Spain-Reichl noted the need to reach out to the voters regularly. Council Member Fay noted that the public feels like the only time they see politicians is in an election year and every 2 years will require more interaction with the public. Council Member Robinson spoke to the time constraints that 2-year terms put on financial and infrastructure plans and development; she supports having the longer term presented to the voters. Council Member Duane Perkins supports 2- year terms. Council Member Laughinghouse supports allowing the public to vote on the length of terms. Council Member Spain-Reichl agrees with longer terms and supports allowing the public the opportunity to vote. Council Member Flanagan asked that the question be presented to the voters. Council Member Rotello spoke to the likelihood of all changes to the Charter being voted down due to the inclusion of 4-year terms. Council Member Salvatore asked that the voters have the choice. Council Member Fay asked for a Roll Call Vote. ________________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Rotello, 2nd by Council Member Coelho, to amend the revision language from 4-year terms for the Council to 2 years. No – 12. Yes – 9 (Coelho, Fay, Henry, Jabbour, Rotello, Chinese, Duane Perkins, Robinson, Dennis Perkins). Motion Fails. Council Member Fay spoke against a 4-year term for the Council noting the current make up of the Council with a super majority membership. Council Member Jabbour noted the difference between a paid position such as Mayor, versus a volunteer position such as the Council and is concerned with a 4 year term and the commitment it would take. Council Member Coelho asked how a vacancy on the Council would be addressed; his concern is that the replacement would be appointed by the town committee and takes the say away from the electors. Council Member Robinson spoke to the municipalities that approved a 4 year term for Mayor but kept the 2 year terms for council members. Council Member Gartner noted that BOE terms are 4 years and have worked. Council Member LaPine discussed the challenge of Council members running when the Mayor is not if the Mayor runs on 4 year terms and is concerned with voter turnout. Council Member Chianese asked for a Roll Call Vote. ________________ Council Member Chianese asked about BOE terms and why the staggering was suggested; Mr. Mortelliti suggested that the Council ask the Commission at the joint meeting. Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Chianese, 2nd by Council Member Coelho, to remove the new language and retain the staggered terms. Yes - 13, No – 8 (Hawley, LaPine, Salvatore, Buzaid, Gartner, Giordano, Britton, McAllister). Motion Carried. Council Member Giordano spoke to the practicality of having only a few BOE members running in some years and low voter turnout. Council Member Robinson asked if the BOE was involved with the changes, Mr. Mortellti confirmed there was discussion with the BOE and their attorneys. Council Member Fay spoke in favor of keeping the staggered terms to retain institutional knowledge. She spoke regarding pressure that was placed on the Commission members so that the Council would make and consider the recommendations provided by the public. Council Member Rotello spoke in favor of keeping the BOE staggered so that the focus would be on the BOE and an opportunity to focus on the work that the schools are doing and the biggest use of City funds. Council Member Chianese suggested that the BOE staggered elections take place on the state election ballots. Council Member Duane Perkins supports keeping the staggered terms. Council Member Britton spoke to removing the staggering due to the expense of elections for just a few positions; he also noted that the state statute allows for removal of the staggering and the language has been discussed in past Charter Revisions. Council Member Duane Perkins asked when the BOE members would appear on the ballots; Council President Buzaid clarified that the (amendment) motion would require BOE members be elected every 2 years. Council Member Henry spoke to the importance of institutional knowledge and learning curves. Council Member Gartner noted that some local races are voted on during state election cycles. Council Member Spain-Reichl spoke in favor of staggered terms. Council Member Coelho spoke to the impact that this issue can have on whether voters can support the other revisions to the Charter; supports staggering the 4-year terms. Council Member Coelho asked for a Roll Call Vote. _____________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Chianese, 2nd by Council Member Henry, to remove language allowing the Mayor to make an appointment to fill a vacancy if not filled within 60 days. No – 13, Yes – 8 (Coelho, Flanagan, Fay, Henry, Rotello, Chianese, Duane Perkins, Dennis Perkins). Motion Failed. Council Member Britton asked what the alternative would be; Council Member Chianese noted that the Council should be notified of the vacancy at the next council meeting, and the Council would vote on the party’s nomination; if a nomination is not made then an ad hoc would be established to find nominees; he supports keeping the power with the Council. Council Member Rotello asked that a process be established to replace the language. Council Member Henry supports the amendment and the appointment should require Council approval. Council Member Gartner noted the need to fill the vacancy in a timely manner. Council Member Fay suggested that 60 days is not enough time and is concerned with centralized power. Council Member Duane Perkins asked for clarification of the amendment and noted that the Commission wants to place a mechanism for the vacancy not to remain open. Council Member Rotello asked for clarification of the timeline if amended; Council Member Gartner noted that if the vacancy is filled by the Mayor the appointment will still be required to be of the same political party. Council Member Fay asked if the Council is required to provide the language; Council President Buzaid confirmed. _______________ Council President Buzaid offered Tuesday, July 21st at 6:30pm as the date for the continued Committee of the Whole meeting. A motion was made by Council Member Rotello, 2nd by Council Member McAllister, to continue the Committee of the Whole to Tuesday (July 21, 2026) at 6:30pm. Yes – 19, No – 2 (Salvatore, Britton). Motion Carried. The meeting adjourned at 11:37pm. Respectfully submitted, Elisa Etcheto, Legislative Assistant  COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Charter Revision – Draft Report: Part III July 21, 2026 – 6:30pm Call To Order: Council President P. Buzaid called the Committee of the Whole to order at 6:33 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance: Council member Coelho led the Pledge of Allegiance. Roll Call: COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Coelho, Flanagan, Hawley, LaPine, Gartner, Buzaid, Fay, Henry, Wallace-Smith, Spain-Reichl, Giordano, Jabbour, Rotello, Chianese, Duane Perkins, Britton, McAllister, Robinson, Laughinghouse COUNCIL MEMBER/S ABSENT: Salvatore, Dennis Perkins. PRESENT: 19, ABSENT: 2 ALSO PRESENT FROM THE CITY: Joseph Mortellti, Outside Counsel and Legal Counsel to the Charter Revision Commission. NOTICE: Council President P. Buzaid called the continued Committee of the Whole meeting to order, and reopened discussion regarding Chapter 2. Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Henry, seconded by Council Member Fay, to add language to Section 2-6 Vacancies, and approved by the City Council. No – 13, Yes – 6 (Coelho, Fay, Henry, Rotello, Chianese, Duane Perkins). Motion Failed. Council Member Henry asked for a Roll Call Vote. ____________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Fay, seconded by Council Member Rotello, to amend the language in Sec 2-2 so that all elected officials will serve a term of 2 years. No - 14, Yes – 5 (Coelho, Fay, Henry, Rotello, Duane Perkins). Motion Failed. Council Member Fay asked that Constables and Zoning Commission members revert back to a 2-year term. Council Member Rotello asked that a friendly amendment be made to include all elected positions in Section 2-2, so that they all serve a 2 year term (absent elected positions that have been voted on in previous motions). Council Member Fay agreed to the friendly amendment. Council Member Fay asked for a Roll Call Vote. ____________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Jabbour, seconded by Council Member Gartner, to replace the word Designated in Sec 2-4 with Appointed. Yes – 18, No – 1. Motion Carried. Council Member Rotello asked if there would be any legal issues with replacing those terms; Mr. Mortellti confirmed there is not, however, he did ask if the intent is now to replace the term Appointed to Nominated throughout the Charter. Council Member Chianese clarified the action that the Council can take regarding the words that the Commission could use; Council President Buzaid explained that the Council is limited to making recommendations; Council Member Rotello asked if that limitation is written somewhere; Council President Buzaid stated that State Statute Sec. 7-191 explains that the Commission can accept or reject a recommendation. Council Member Duane Perkins asked if the Council is not allowed to make a word change; Council President clarified that all amendments by the Council to the report are recommendations for the Commission. _____________ Council Member Rotello asked for clarification on language regarding Elected Officials and residency requirements; Council President Buzaid confirmed that the language in Sec. 2-7 is clear that officials must be electors or voters and thus a resident. _____________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Chianese, seconded by Council Member Duane Perkins, to recommend that the Charter Revision Commission review the language in Sec. 2-8, and consider: striking out all revisions, refer the language to what is required in the state statute, or include both language options. Yes – 16, No – 3. Motion Carried. Council Member Chianese clarified that State Statute allows for the two variations of the language including the original and revised language proposed by the Commission. Council Member Coelho asked if a friendly amendment would be accepted to include both terms “under god or penalty of perjury” instead of leaving it up to the state statute; Council Member Chianese noted that state statute supersedes the Charter. Council Member Coelho asked Mr. Motellti if there would be a reason to not refer to the state statute; Mr. Mortellit explained that you could use the and/or language, or refer to the statute, and explained that there is “home rule” clause allowing and individual to deviate from the statutes in regards to this point; he suggested that the recommendation language include both options. Council Member Rotello asked for clarification on the Commission’s intent for striking the language; Mr. Mortellti confirmed that general language was presented to replace religious language. Council Member Fay agrees to allow either language to be used per state statute. Council Member Hawley supports striking all language and allowing the individual to choose their language. A friendly amendment was agreed to. _____________ A motion was made by Council Member Gartner, seconded by Council Member Chianese, to approve the revisions made by the Charter Revision Commission in Chapter 3. Motion superseded by amendments. Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Henry, seconded by Council Member Fay, to have the commission review the language in Sec. 3-3 and remove “may be removed by the Mayor”. No - 14, Yes - 5 (Coelho, Fay, Henry, Rotello, Duane Perkins). Motion Failed. Council Member Garter and Robinson asked for clarification; Council President Buzaid clarified that the changed language would be “may be removed by a 2/3 vote of the entire membership of the Council”. Council Member Fay supports the amendment and spoke to the need for the position to be independent of the Mayor’s Office and asked that the Commission discuss to whom the Legislative Assistant reports. Council Member Rotello spoke to the history of the position and the need to have oversight over the Council’s assistant; he spoke in favor of the Council hiring or firing the Council’s staff, and that the Council should be able to rectify a concern with the Legislative Assistant. Council Members Jabbour and LaPine spoke to the language that provides the Council with the ability to provide input and vote if the Council wants to keep or remove the Legislative Assistant. Council Member Wallace-Smith spoke against adding personnel oversight to the duties of the Council. Council Member Coelho spoke to the existing language that identifies the Legislative Assistant as the Clerk to the Council, and asked why the Council would give away the power to have oversight of the Legislative Assistant. Council Member Britton explained that the proposed language gives the Council oversight over the removal of the Legislative Assistant, which it does not currently have. Council Member Fay stated that the language should be closely reviewed and clarified by the Commission. Council Member Robinson noted that the language as it exists does not allow the Council to have a say in the removal of the Legislative Assistant, and the proposed language would give the Council a say. Council Member Chianese spoke to the high voting threshold to appoint and remove the Legislative Assistant with a 2/3 vote of the entire membership. Member Fay asked for a Roll Call Vote. _____________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Fay, seconded by Council Member Henry, to ask that the Commission revisit the language that refers to the State Statute in Sec 3-8 and Sec. 3-10. No – 14, Yes – 6. Motion Failed. Council Member Rotello spoke to the need to continue noticing in newspapers for those that do still use them. Council Member Chianese asked what would happen if state statute noticing requirements change; Mr. Mortelliti explained that if the statute changes noticing can still be done in the newspaper if requested. Council Member Chianese suggested a notice consisting of a small message asking people to view the full text of ordinances on the City website. Council Member Fay noted additional references in Sec. 3-8 and 3-10 that should be included in the motion. Council Member Coelho asked that legal counsel provide the state statutes regarding the last two amendments to the Council and Commission. _____________ Council Member LaPine asked for clarification of Section 3-6 regarding what officials this references; Mr. Mortelliti suggested the Council make a motion to have the Commission review the language. Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member LaPine, seconded by Council Member Rotello, to have the Commission review Sec. 3-6, and consider the removal of the term “elected”. Yes - 16 , No – 2. Motion Carried. Council Member Rotello supports striking the change. Council Member Fay asked that the Commission consider changing the language to “the current sitting City Council”. _____________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Jabbour, seconded by Council Member Rotello, to amend all Charter references to state statutes to General Statutes. Yes - 19. Motion Carried Unanimously. Council Member Chianese made a friendly amendment to include the change throughout the Charter. Council Member Jabbour accepted the friendly amendment. _____________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Jabbour, seconded by Council Member Chianese, to clarify the language in Sec. 3-13 to include “ad hoc, standing, or committees of the whole”. Yes – 14, No - 6. Motion Carried. Council Member Hawley asked if Committee of the Whole needs to be added and if specific standing committees need to be named; Council President Buzaid noted that it adds clarity and that standing committees do not need to be named in the Charter. _____________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Rotello, seconded by Council Member Coelho, to strike all revised language in Sec. 3-13 regarding committees, except for ad hoc committees. Motion Failed. Council Member Robinson spoke to the need to continued discussion and a standing committee would assist in making progress and urged the council to vote in favor of keeping the revised language that includes standing committees. Council Member Chianese spoke regarding the need for a standing committee to allow an audit committee to meet and act; and suggested that an ordinance committee be established to update code of ordinances. Council Member Rotello spoke against standing committees and asked how members of the committees would be chosen and expressed concerns with what other requests might come down the road. Council Member Duane Perkins spoke against standing committees. Council Member Coelho against standing committee and spoke to the need to create safeguards to prevent power to a few in the majority. Council Member Chianese asked Counsel to confirm that committees in Sec. 3-13 would consist of city council members only; Mr. Mortellti confirmed that the committees are made up of City Council members. _____________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Chianese, seconded by Council Member Duane Perkins, to consider adding language requiring that a resolution establishing and rescind a standing committee require a 2/3 vote. Motion Failed. Council Member Rotello asked that the Commission provide some sort of structure behind standing committees. Council Member Robinson asked for confirmation that all committees must still report back to the Council; Mr. Mortellti confirmed that this section does not amend how committees function. _____________ Council Member Chianese asked if the term nominate will be added to Sec. 3-3. A motion was made by Council Member Chianese, seconded by Council Member Fay, to add language, to all areas in the Charter that state Appoint (or nominate), to include “and re-nominate” Motion failed. Council Member Rotello stated that if an individual is already appointed, then the individual would be re-appointed, not re-nominated. Council Member Fay clarified that her intent was to have the Council approve all re-appointments/re-nominations. _________________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Duane Perkins, seconded by Council Member Rotello, to recommend that language be added to include a term limit of 2 years for any chair of a committee. No - 13, Yes – 6. Motion Failed. Council Member Chianese asked if the term could be part of a resolution that establishes the committee; Council President Buzaid confirmed it could. Council Member Rotello and Fay spoke in favor of the motion. A recess was taken at 8:28pm. The Committee of the Whole Reconvened at 8:43pm. Main Motion A motion was made by Council Member Gartner, seconded by Council Member Hawley, to approve the recommendations made by the Charter Revision Commission for Chapter 4. Motion superseded by amendments. Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Fay, seconded by Council Member Coelho, to review the revised language in Sec. 4.1; leaving the amount at $1,000, and require reporting to the Council. Motion superseded by a request to split the motion. A motion was made by Council Member Fay, seconded by Council Member Coelho, to review the revised language in Sec. 4.1 leaving the amount at $1,000. Motion Failed. A motion was made by Council Member Fay, seconded by Council Member Coelho, to review the revised language in Sec. 4-1 to require reporting to the Council of any gifts being made to the city. Yes – 11, No - 8. Motion Carried. Council Member Fay explained concerns with having one individual accept a donation. Council Member Gartner noted that donations are being made to the City. Council Member Coelho asked why donations would not be presented to the Council to make the donation public and transparent. Council Member Rotello spoke to the intent behind donations and the need to have the donation recorded publicly. Council Member Giordano pointed out language that requires donations to still be presented to the Council. Council Member Robinson asked if the amendment motion was meant to only address the increased amount to $5,000; Council Member Fay asked if existing charter language regarding an amount in excess of $5,000 is included; Mr. Mortellti explained that if the Mayor’s Office wanted to report donations back to the Council it could do so. Council Member Rotello asked why the Commission made this change; Mr. Mortelliti suggested that the amount was part of a dated revision and was made to account for current monetary values, however, he suggested asking the Commission to clarify their intent. Council Member Fay clarified that her concern is with the mayor accepting the donation as well as the amount, and spoke to the need for transparency. Council Member Rotello asked for clarification in whether this is meant to address donations to the mayor; Council President Buzaid clarified that this addresses donations to the City but accepted by the mayor. Council Member Chianese asked for clarification regarding donations of $5,000 or less not being required to be reported to the Council; Mr. Mortellti confirmed that the mayor can accept a donation up to $5,000, anything over $5,000 requires the mayor to report the donation to the Council. _____________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Rotello, seconded by Council Member Duane Perkins, to strike the proposed language. Motion Failed. Council Member Coelho asked why this language was stricken by the Commission; Mr. Mortellti spoke to the importance of the Chief of Staff to the Office of the Mayor and the Commission had concerns with the Council removing the individual, and he that did not know if this has ever been an issue. _____________ Council President Buzaid noted that there are no changes in Chapter 5. A motion was made by Council Member Gartner, 2nd by Council Member Jabbour, to approve the revisions made in Chapter 6. Motion superseded by amendments. Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Hawley, seconded by Council Member Jabbour, to reconsider the amendments made to the Town Clerk, and keeping it as an elected position. Yes - 11, No – 8 (LaPine, Buzaid, Wallace-smith, Giordano, Chianese, Britton, Mcallister, Laughinghouse). Motion carried. Council Member Hawley spoke to concerns with insufficient reasons for the change, and noted that if it moves forward as appointed, that a plan to assure protections for the Town Clerk be established. Council Member Jabbour supports the motion and expressed concerns with future administrations and appointments; by keeping this as an elected position the electors continue to have oversight. Council Member Rotello spoke to the importance of the office and is concerned with no plans to assure that the office will be protected if the classification is changed. Council Member Chianese supports the appointment of the Town Clerk and believes the position should be subject to the Merit system in additional to some other safeguards, he suggested that the Commission reconsider the changes and consider addressing more questions. Council Member Flanagan asked that the office have a say in what language is included the charter; Council President Buzaid noted existing language that states, “shall include but not be limited to”. To address office tasks. Council Members Fay and Duane Perkins discussed concerns with this position being appointed or elected, and noted that additional discussion needs to be had to make this position more stable. Council Member Coelho spoke to the need to include duties required by state statute in the language and asked that the Commission consider adding it back in. Council Member Hawley asked for a Roll Call Vote. ____________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member LaPine, seconded by Council Member Wallace- Smith, to refer Sec. 6-8 back to the Commission to consider adding qualifications. No – 10, Yes - 9. Motion Failed. Council Member LaPine commented on why there are no qualification requirements for the Director of Public Works. Council Member Fay asked for clarification on what can be discussed by the Council; Mr. Mortellti identified Sec. 7-191 of the General Statutes subsection c and confirmed that the Council is not limited to the red-lined changes. Council Member Jabbour noted existing language that includes technical training, demonstrated executive and administrative qualifications. Council Member Robinson asked that the amendment be made to include qualifications for all the positions in Sec. 6-8; Council Member LaPine declined. Council Member Rotello expressed concerns with establishing qualifications ____________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Henry, seconded by Council Member Fay, to refer Sec. 6-18 back to the Commission to consider changing the word Shall to May. Rescinded. Council Member Robinson asked if a friendly amendment could be made to review the whole section including define “Full access”, conditions of access and include additional language. Council Member Henry agreed to the friendly amendment. Council Member Chianese asked that the motion be amended to send the whole section return back to the Commission, and that the Council continue to discuss all changes to the section before a motion is made with specific recommendations. Council President Buzaid asked if Council Member Henry would agree to a rescind his first motion. A motion was made by Council Member Henry, seconded by Council Member Fay, to refer all of Sec. 6-18 back to the Commission. Yes - 15, No – 4. Motion Carried. A motion was made by Council Member Henry, seconded by Council Member Fay, to refer Sec. 6-18 back to the Commission to consider changing the word Shall to May, to review what information needs to be defined and what “financial information” means. Yes – 10, No – 9 (LaPine, Buzaid, Gartner, Wallace-Smith, Giordano, Jabbour, Britton, McAllister, Laughinghouse). Motion Carried. Council Member Henry asked that the word Shall be replaced with May. Council Member Robinson asked that terms and requirements be clarified including the term “full access”, what personnel would be involved, confirm privacy, and provide reporting guidelines. Council Member Duane Perkins asked that the Commission review software access. Council Member Chianese discussed existing state statute requirements and asked what the penalty would be if the BOE does not comply. He urged the Commission to review the whole section again and incorporate the state statute10-248 requirements in the language. Council Member Laughinghouse spoke to the intent of the new section; Mr. Mortellti explained that meetings took place with the BOE and their legal representatives and that they approved the language except for the word Shall, and agreed that the intent was to put in writing a working relationship that currently exists. Council Member Rotello stated that the information being requested is already being submitted to the state so he does not see a concern with having the city receive the information as well. Council Member Rotello noted that public comment included concerns with access to software that could open up the BOE software to ransom ware threats. Council Member Robinson discussed additional information clarification. Council Member Henry asked who would be responsible for legal claims against the BOE; Mr. Mortellti confirmed that the BOE would continue to consult with their own attorneys but additional factors could affect that. Council Member Jabbour asked if the question could be split; Council President Buzaid stated that a vote was taken to combine the questions. Council Member Jabbour expressed her vote against the request to replace Shall with May. Council Member Coelho discussed concerns with the term Financial Affairs being too vague and asked if a legal opinion has been established to confirm that there is no legal conflict or potential for legal action; Mr. Mortellti confirmed that language was added to the section to prevent legal action. Council Member Coelho asked for a legal letter regarding his question. Council Member Coelho asked for a Roll Call Vote. _____________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Rotello, seconded by Council Member Duane Perkins, to add “Approved By the Council” to the language appointing the IT Director by the Mayor, and add that language to all sections in Chapter 6 that addresses department heads. No – 11 (Hawley, LaPine, Buzaid, Gartner, Wallce-Smith, Spain-Reichl, Giordano, Britton, McAllister, Robinson, Laughinghouse). Yes – 8. Motion Failed. Council Member Rotello spoke regarding the importance of this department and asked that the appointment of this Director follow the same process as other department heads. Council Member Chinaese asked for a friendly amendment to include consistent language throughout this section requiring all department heads to be appointed and confirmed by the City Council. Council Member Rotello agreed to the friendly amendment. Council President Buzaid noted language regarding appointments of Department heads in Chapter 6; Council Member Chianese clarified that he would like the Commission to add the appointment and confirmation language to all sections referring to department heads. Council Member Coelho asked for a Roll Call Vote. Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Hawley, seconded by Council Member Chianese, to amend Sec. 6-4 requiring a 2/3 confirmation vote by the Council. Yes - 11 , No – 8 (LaPine, Buzaid, Gartner, Wallace-Smith, Giordano, Britton, Robinson, Laughinghouse). Motion Carried. Council President Buzaid asked for a Roll Call Vote. ____________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Chianese, seconded by Council Member Rotello, to recommend that they change the department name back to the Department of Elderly Services. Yes - 9, No – 10 (Hawley, LaPine, Buzaid, Gartner, Spain-Reichl, Giordano, Britton, McAllister, Robinson, Laughinghouse). Motion Failed. Council Member LaPine explained that the Director of the Senior Center is seen as a negative term. Council Member Coelho spoke to the positive attitude towards the term Elderly and supports keeping the name. Council Member Rotello spoke to society’s interpretation of the terms Elderly vs. Aging and supports the amendment. Council Member Robinson agreed that Aging is used more in the industry and made a friendly amendment to identify Sections 6-3 and 6-14. Council Member Chianese spoke to the use of terms before documents are changed and asked why the change is taking place now if nothing has been presented to the Council or Commission. Council Member Giordano asked why the term was changed; Mr. Mortellti explained that the Commission felt it was a more inclusive and contemporary term and that they are interchangeable. Council Member Coelho asked for a Roll Call Vote. ____________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Chianese, seconded by Council Member Henry, to recommend that the Commission reconsider keeping the name: Department of Parks and Recreation. NO- 11 (Hawley, LaPine, Buzaid, Gartner, Spain-Reichl, Giordano, Jabbour, Britton, Mcallsiter, Robinson, Laughinghouse), Yes - 8. Motion Failed. Council Member Chianese spoke to the importance of having this department continue to address the needs of parks in the city and that the Public Works department cannot take on the additional work. Council Member Henry asked for clarification of why the name was changed; Mr. Mortelliti is not able to clarify the reason for the change. Council Member Flanagan explained that the Department should be able to address and direct work on the fields and parks. Council Member Coelho asked if the department currently oversees the maintenance of the parks; Council President Buzaid stated that oversight of the maintenance of Parks is not under the purvey of the Commission. Council Member Duane Perkins asked if the reason for the change was addressed by the Commission and if budgetary definitions were considered as part of the change. Council Member Robinson clarified that the responsibilities in this section explain why the name change was suggested. ___________ Council Member Coelho asked why affirmative action was replaced with opportunity programs to Section 6-15; Mr. Morelliti spoke to changes regarding this subject at the national level and were being sensitive to possible funding challenges that have come up in recent years. ____________ A motion was made by Council Member Gartner, seconded by Council Member LaPine, to approve the revisions by Commission to Chapter 7. Motion superseded by amendments. Council Member Rotello asked why the specific date was removed in Sec. 7-3; Council President Buzaid and Mr. Mortellti confirmed that the change was made due to conflicts with holidays and schedule conflicts. Council Member Chianese spoke to his concerns with the increase to the bond amount due to the consist borrowing of the maximum bond amount every year; he also expressed concerns with the terms of the type of projects that can be used; Mr. Mortellti confirmed that the term is for 20 years maximum and that section 7-10 addresses all of the Council Member’s questions and noted that Bond Counsel would be better equipped to answer bond questions. Mr. Mortellti confirmed that he would request the information from Bond Counsel. Council Member Duane Perkins asked if the $5M bond can be issued more than once per year; Council President Buzaid confirmed that the language limits the issuance of bonds to the amount in the Charter; Council Member Rotello asked for specific language confirming that multiple bonds cannot be issued in one year; Council President Buzaid identified the language “shall not exceed” as confirmation. Council Member Fay asked for clarification of the question that is being requested from Bond Counsel and asked that the Commission add additional language to control what $5M can be issued for due to the impact on the City and taxpayers. Council Member Chianese provided an example of his question, Can the city borrow $5M in separate years for the same project; Mr. Mortellti confirmed that those limitations are not included in Sec. 7-10. Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Fay, seconded by Council Member Chianese, to refer section 7-10 back to the Commission and discuss additional internal controls, and limitations including the use of the money. No – 13, Yes – 6 (Coelho, Fay, Henry, Rotello, Chianese, Duane Perkins). Motion failed. Council Member Chianese asked if a City Employee can serve on the City Council and asked that that be addressed in this section. Council Member Duane Perkins asked what other ethics concerns was discussed, specifically anything other than monetary; Mr. Mortellti refers to the Code and believes that it does address other conflicts. Council Member Jabbour confirmed that the code does address other forms of conflict and ethics. Council Member Robinson spoke to state statues that address ethics concerns; Mr. Mortellti confirmed. Council Member Rotello expressed concerns with future interpretation of the language and agrees that a reference to State Statute 2-99 is needed. Council Member LaPine stated that the City has a Board of Ethics. Council Member Duane Perkins suggested that the Commission review what the bond funds can be used for. Council Member Gartner spoke against referring this back to the Commission due to the rational of the increase and has not been abused in the past. Council President asked for a Roll Call Vote. ____________ A motion was made by Council Member Gartner, seconded by Council Member LaPine, to approve the revisions by the Charter Revision Commission to Chapter 8. Motion superseded by amendment. Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Fay, Council Member Rotello, to refer section 8-2/ 8- 3 back to the Commission consider other types of conflicts in addition to Monetary conflicts. No – 14, Yes –5 (Coelho, Fay, Henry, Rotello, Chianese, Robinson). Motion failed. Council Member Chianese asked if a City Employee can serve on the City Council and asked that that be addressed in this section. Council Member Duane Perkins asked what other ethics concerns was discussed, specifically anything other than monetary; Mr. Mortellti refers to the Code and believes that it does address other conflicts. Council Member Jabbour confirmed that the code does address other forms of conflict and ethics. Council Member Robinson spoke to state statues that address ethics concerns; Mr. Mortellti confirmed. Council Member Rotello expressed concerns with future interpretation of the language and agrees that a reference to State Statute 2-99 is needed. Council Member LaPine stated that the City has a Board of Ethics. Council President asked for a Roll Call Vote. ____________ Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Chianese, Council Member Rotello, to reinstate the language of Section 8-2. Yes- 10, No – 9 (Hawley, Buzaid, Gartner, Wallace-Smith, Spain- Reichl, Giordano, Britton, Mcallister, Laughinghouse). Motion Carried. Council Member Rotello asked if removal of this section would also affect the current IT Director to keep his position. Mr. Mortellti stated that if an individual is in an existing permanent position that they would be covered. Council Member Giordano asked why this section was removed; Mr. Mortellti explained that the Commission agreed to strike the language but he did not have a specific reason in his note. Council Member Chianese stated that he is open to the Commission amending the language, however he wants existing employees to retain the jobs. Council Member LaPine asked if it would be appropriate for the Commission Chair to clarify the intent; Council President Buzaid reminded the Council that there is a motion on the floor. Council Member Coelho asked that the Commission remember that the Council should protect the employees of the City. Council President asked for a Roll Call Vote. ____________ Council Member Fay explained that she was not able to find an ordinance from 1963 that is reference in Sec. 8-8 and 8-10, and asked if is still relevant; Council President Buzaid referenced ordinances that combined the Town and City. Amendment: A motion was made by Council Member Fay, seconded by Council Member Henry, that the Commission review Sec. 8-8 to decern if the reference to 9-24-63 is still applicable. No – 11, Yes – 8 (Coelho, Fay, Henry, Jabbour, Rotello, Chianese, Duane Perkins, Robinson). Motion Failed. Council President asked for a Roll Call Vote. ____________ A motion was made by Council Member Gartner, seconded by Council Member LaPine, that the City Council transmit to the Charter Revision Commission the approved recommended changes and amendments as voted upon in each chapter, and convene a meeting to confer between the two bodies for final presentation to the City Council. Yes - 16, No – 3 (Fay, Rotello, Duane Perkins). Motion carried. Council Member Chianese asked to address the term length of the Town Clerk now that the recommendation was made to keep it as an elected position; Council President clarified that there is a motion on the floor. Council Member Britton asked legal counsel to confirm that the motion is accurate; Mr. Mortelliti asked that the motion clarify that the joint meeting is for the two bodies to confer. Council Member Gartner amended the motion. A motion was made by Council Member Rotello, seconded by Council Member Jabbour, to close the Committee of the Whole and adjourn. Motion Carried Unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 12:08 am. Respectfully submitted, Elisa Etcheto, Legislative Assistant