City Plan Board

City of Dayton City Plan Board Minute Record Overview July 9, 2024 4:30 P.M. Planning Resource Conference Room, City Hall 101 W. Third Street, Dayton, Ohio Members Present: Ms. Leslie Lovelace, Mr. Matt Sauer, Ms. Ann Schenking, Mr. Greg Scott Members Excused: Mr. William Allen, Ms. Rosie Miller, Ms. Geraldine Pegues Mr. Scott called the meeting to order at 4:30 P.M. A motion was made by Ms. Schenking, seconded by Mr. Sauer, and carried to excuse the absences of Mr. Allen, Ms. Miller, and Ms. Pegues. A motion was made by Ms. Lovelace, seconded by Mr. Sauer, and carried to approve the minutes of the June 11, 2024, meeting with the corrections proposed by Mr. Scott that for case PLN2024-00150, the work session for the proposed police station at Third and Abbey, it had been stated that due to the property being a corner lot, the site plan as proposed was not compliant with the requirements for the location of the front entrance, the requirements for the landscaping of the parking lot islands were not met, and the setback of the parking lot from Abbey was not sufficient as had previously been held by Plan Board. 1. PLN2024-00177 – Subdivision Record Plan Located at 430 N Main St Applicant: Randy Wolfe 6219 Centre Park Dr. West Chester, OH 45069 Priority Land Use Board: North Central Planning District: McPherson Decision: Approved with Conditions 2. PLN2024-00181 – Subdivision Record Plan Located at 50 Central Ave Applicant: Greater Dayton Premier Management 400 Wayne Ave Dayton, OH 45410 Priority Land Use Board: North Central Planning District: Grafton Hill Decision: Approved with Conditions 3. PLN2024-00182 – Subdivision Record Plan Located at Fourth and Jefferson streets (Levitt Pavilion) Applicant: City of Dayton 101 W. Third St. DAYTON, OH 45402 Priority Land Use Board: Downtown Planning District: Downtown Decision: Approved with Conditions 4. PLN2024-00158 – Subdivision Record Plan Located at 19 Five Oaks Ave PUSHED TO AUGUST Applicant: Thomas Marsh 8529 Byers Rd Miamisburg, OH 45342 Priority Land Use Board: North Central Planning District: Riverdale Decision: Approved with Conditions City Plan Board Minute Record Summary Page 2 July 9, 2024 4. PLN2024-00186 – Work Session for University of Dayton’s General Development Plan Applicant: planning NEXT 955 Yard St. Suite 150 Columbus, OH 43212 Priority Land Use Board: Downtown Planning District: University Park Decision: Approved with Conditions 5. PLN2024-00175 – Final Plan for Proposed Public Safety Facility Located at the SE Corner of Third St and Abbey Ave Applicant: City of Dayton c/o Major Paul Saunders 101 W Third Street DAYTON, OH 45402 Priority Land Use Board: West Planning District: Arlington Heights Decision: N/A The Plan Board meeting was adjourned by Mr. Scott at 6:58 P.M. Minutes approved by the City Plan Board on August 13, 2024. Jennifer Hanauer, Secretary City Plan Board  City of Dayton City Plan Board Summary Minute Record July 9, 2024 1. PLN2024-00177 – A record plan to consolidate twenty-six (26) City lots into two (2) City lots along White Allen Ave. Applicant: Randy C Wolf Priority Land Use Board: North Central Planning District: McPherson Decision: Approved with conditions Staff Comments Elizabeth Dakin presented the case. This is a record plan to consolidate twenty-five (26) City lots into two (2) City lots along White Allen Ave. The lots are zoned MGC Mature General Commercial. The lots are being consolidated to facilitate future improvements on the site. Public Comments None. Board Discussion None. Board Action A motion was made by Ms. Schenking, seconded by Ms. Lovelace, and carried to approve Case PLN2024- 00177 subject to the following conditions: 1. Revise the Record Plan and any Construction Drawings per the City of Dayton Subdivision Regulations and comments from the Division of Civil Engineering. 2. Ensure that the dimensions are close to within a 1:10,000 ratio. 3. Add any easements required by AES, City of Dayton Water, etc. 4. A water utility easement needs to be established for the 8” sanitary sewer that runs on the west side of the proposed site. The easement shall be the width of the vacated alley. Mr. William Allen Excused Mr. Matt Sauer Yes Ms. Leslie Lovelace Yes Ms. Ann Schenking Yes Ms. Rosalyn Miller Excused Mr. Greg Scott Yes Ms. Geraldine Pegues Excused Minutes approved by the City Plan Board on August 13, 2024. Jen Hanauer, Secretary City Plan Board  City of Dayton City Plan Board Summary Minute Record July 9, 2024 2. PLN2024-00181 – A record plan to consolidate four (4) City lots into one (1) City lot at 50 Central Ave. Applicant: Greater Dayton Premier Management Priority Land Use Board: North Central Planning District: Grafton Hill Decision: Approved with conditions Staff Comments Jen Hanauer presented the case. This is a record plan to consolidate four (4) City lots into one (1) City lot at 50 Central Ave. There is an existing 7-story multi-family dwelling with a parking lot in the rear that will remain. The proposed lot would not meet the minimum requirements of the MMF Mature Multi-family Residential zoning district. Approval would require variances to allow for setbacks and lot coverage to accommodate existing conditions. Public Comments None. Board Discussion Mr. Sauer clarified that the alley that runs most of the east property line does not extend all the way through the property. Board Action A motion was made by Ms. Schenking, seconded by Mr. Sauer, and carried to approve Case PLN2024- 00181 subject to the following conditions: 1. Revise the Record Plan and any Construction Drawings per the City of Dayton Subdivision Regulations and comments from the Division of Civil Engineering. 2. Ensure that the dimensions are close to within a 1:10,000 ratio. 3. Add any easements required by AES, City of Dayton Water, etc. 4. Establish a water utility easement for the 8” sanitary sewer that runs on the north side of the proposed site. The easement shall be the width of the vacated alley. 5. Revise the City Engineer’s stamp as indicated by the City Engineer. 6. Add a red outline around new lots. 7. As the approval of this record plan would create a non-conforming lot in that the existing setbacks are less than the minimum required and the lot coverage exceeds the maximum allowed, variances shall be granted to allow for setbacks and lot coverage as proposed. Mr. William Allen Excused Mr. Matt Sauer Yes Ms. Leslie Lovelace Yes Ms. Ann Schenking Yes Ms. Rosalyn Miller Excused Mr. Greg Scott Yes Ms. Geraldine Pegues Excused Minutes approved by the City Plan Board on August 13, 2024. Jen Hanauer, Secretary City Plan Board  City of Dayton City Plan Board Summary Minute Record July 9, 2024 3. PLN2024-00182 – A record plan to consolidate twenty-five (25) City lots into one (1) City lot at Fourth and Jefferson streets (Levitt Pavilion) Applicant: City of Dayton Priority Land Use Board: Downtown Planning District: Downtown Decision: Approved with conditions Staff Comments Jen Hanauer presented the case. This is a record plan to consolidate twenty-five (25) City lots into one (1) City lot at Fourth and Jefferson streets (Levitt Pavilion). The lots are zoned OS Open Space and is surrounded by CBD Central Business District. The lots are being consolidated to facilitate future improvements on the site. Ms. French confirmed that an improvement involving a shipping container is planned for the central/southeast corner of the property. Public Comments None. Board Discussion None. Board Action A motion was made by Mr. Sauer, seconded by Ms. Lovelace, and carried to approve Case PLN2024- 00182 subject to the following conditions: 1. Revise the Record Plan and any Construction Drawings per the City of Dayton Subdivision Regulations and comments from the Division of Civil Engineering. 2. Ensure that the dimensions are close to within a 1:10,000 ratio. 3. Add any easements required by AES, City of Dayton Water, etc. 4. Establish a water utility easement for the 4” water main that runs through the proposed site. The easement shall be 20-feet wide, with the utility centered in the easement. 5. Add a red outline around new lots. Mr. William Allen Excused Mr. Matt Sauer Yes Ms. Leslie Lovelace Yes Ms. Ann Schenking Yes Ms. Rosalyn Miller Excused Mr. Greg Scott Yes Ms. Geraldine Pegues Excused Minutes approved by the City Plan Board on August 13, 2024. Jen Hanauer, Secretary City Plan Board  City of Dayton City Plan Board Summary Minute Record July 9, 2024 4. PLN2024-00186 – General Development Plan Work Session– University of Dayton Applicant: University of Dayton Priority Land Use Board: Greater Downtown Planning District: University Park Decision: No action; work session Staff Comments Jen Hanauer presented context for the work session and introduced the applicant. The work session was scheduled for the board to review and share comments on the University of Dayton’s draft General Development Plan. The campus property is in the University Park planning district. Ms. Hanauer shared that the University of Dayton is seeking to update and replace the existing General Development Plan with a new document that is inclusive of the full campus property. She described that campus includes a mix of zoning districts including planned development overlays. She described the history of the general development plan originally adopted in 2008 up to the current date. Ms. Hanauer provided the General Development Plan Submission Requirements as detailed in the zoning code for the Board’s information. She also included additional staff guidance provided by Ms. Susan Vincent and Ms. Jennifer Hanauer as UD developed their plan and detailed how the applicant responded to these requests and requirements. Finally, Ms. Hanauer provided the criteria that Plan Board must consider when reviewing the final General Development Plan to facilitate the discussion. Applicant Comments The applicant, Rick Krysiak, representing the University of Dayton at 201 Brown Street, Dayton, Ohio 45402, spoke on the draft General Development Plan. He shared context regarding the changing landscape of higher education and how those changes are impacting the University of Dayton. He directly welcomed feedback from staff and the board. David Schmidt, University of Dayton, 300 College Park Drive, Dayton, Ohio 45402, spoke on the draft plan. He shared the University’s intention to reduce the student population and staff numbers by about 10- 15% which directly impacts parking and housing pressures. WGI is completing the University’s parking analysis and action plan. Mr. Schmidt shared further details and context regarding parking and the University’s goal to continue to develop as a pedestrian-friendly, multi-modal campus. He talked through where the university will be anticipating a reduction in staff versus where it is experiencing growth. Building design standards will be included in the update but are not available in the current draft. Andrew Souders, planningNEXT representing the University of Dayton, 4929 Elks Drive, Columbus, Ohio 45469, spoke on the plan document. Mr. Souders highlighted specific sections from the draft including its consistency with other adopted City of Dayton plans; that the development on campus will consider the area and context around and between its borders; that internal development will be coordinated and harmonious; that the campus will have adequate open spaces; and how the campus will be sensitive to the site and environment surrounding the site (gateways and entryways). Mr. Souders opened the floor for discussion. Board Discussion Ms. Schenking shared her appreciation for the philosophy of the plan. She asked for clarification regarding a statement in the parking section: “current issues with parking availability restrained with the reallocation  City of Dayton Page 2 City Plan Board Summary Minute Record July 9, 2024 of space.” Mr. Krysiak shared an explanation of the University’s parking policies and how those policies constrain preferred areas versus where parking is available. Ms. Schenking asked if the University sees a role for the private sector to provide more amenity-rich housing for the students than may exist in some of the dorms; referencing the Flight, a new housing development attractive to university students. Mr. Krysiak shared that the university’s analysis shows an excess of student beds on campus; based on the status of declining student populations, he shared that he foresees an excess of beds to remain. Mr. Sauer asked for more information about Campus West regarding excess parking and how it interacts with future developments such as onMain. How does the University think about activating these spaces given the challenge of a declining student population paired with new developments like the Arts Center? He shared an opinion that there are a lot of gaps due to parking lots along Brown and Stewart Streets. Mr. Schmidt agreed with Mr. Sauer that Campus West is an opportunity for future development. Mr. Scott asked a follow-up question regarding the impact of developing current parking lots. He asked clarification regarding where parking spots are located and how their locations are related to the use of the shuttle. Mr. Schmidt shared that these details will be included in the final document. Mr. Scott expressed concerns regarding allocating parking spots to the fringes which abut residential areas. He described the impact of surface parking when placed along primary corridors or gateway streets and the opinion that these parking lots should not be fronting on such streets. He raised the question about how the university will address the loss of parking as surface lots are developed and if streets are redesigned to remove on-street parking. Mr. Scott asked if there are any restrictions on students having cars. Mr. Schmidt shared that freshman are not permitted to have a parking permit but sophomores and above are granted permits. Mr. Scott expressed concern that this permit refusal may encourage freshman to park cars on city streets or in locations not on campus versus encouraging them to forgo a car entirely. Mr. Schmidt asked a clarifying question regarding Mr. Scott’s reference to figure 16. Mr. Souder provided context regarding the intent to provide some general typologies for street design versus identifying specific locations. Mr. Scott asked questions about parking enforcement and if campus police might be able to enforce city parking ordinances. He stressed that he is not encouraging more surface parking and is in support of multi- modal systems, environments, and policies. He asked about bike racks. Mr. Krysiak expressed the need to restrict cycling and scooters in the core of campus due to the high pedestrian usage but also shared the need to revisit these policies. Ms. Schenking asked if the university knows how important parking is to new or existing students. Mr. Krysiak shared that the answer is not entirely known just that there is an expectation from students that parking will be provided due to the historical policy to do so. He expressed that this does not mean the policies cannot change; the University’s policies have changed for other systems. Ms. Schenking shared an interest in better understanding how many cars are brought to campus, parked, and then stationary for days. She suggested (with humor) that this would be a good graduate student research project. Mr. Krysiak shared general understandings about where students currently park.  City of Dayton Page 3 City Plan Board Summary Minute Record July 9, 2024 Board Action No actions required at this time. Minutes approved by the City Plan Board on August 13, 2024. Jennifer Hanauer, Secretary City Plan Board  City of Dayton City Plan Board Summary Minute Record July 9, 2024 5. PLN2024-00175 – Final Plan – West Police Facility Applicant: Major Paul Saunders, City of Dayton Priority Land Use Board: West Planning District: Arlington Heights Decision: Approved with conditions Staff Comments Tony Kroeger presented the case, a Final Plan Review for a proposed public safety facility (police) at the southeast corner of W. Third St. and Abbey Ave. in a Mixed-Use (MX) zoning district with a Planned Development (PD-180) overlay. Public safety facilities are a permitted use in the MX and PD-180 districts but require Final Plan approval from the Plan Board. Mr. Kroeger pointed out the unusual shape and frontage of the parcel as part of why the site plan was developed as it was. The building has been situated so that it is built near the Abbey Avenue and West Third Street rights-of-way. The proposed site plan and floor plan are similar to what was shown at the work session in June. The parking lot is situated to the south of the building, with the primary entrance at the southwest corner of the building facing Abbey Avenue. The proposed building would be approximately 10,000 sq. ft. one-story building, housing the West patrol operations, including command and officers. There are approximately 116 parking spaces included on the site plan. This includes spaces to accommodate police cruisers, personal automobiles, and spaces for the public, as there is a public meeting room included. The primary means of vehicular access will be from Abbey Avenue. Street trees are shown in the site plan, which would be in conformance with typical zoning code requirements. Mr. Kroeger showed where fencing is proposed surrounding the non-public areas of the parking lot. Mr. Kroeger showed new renderings that show a memorial walk around the north and west sides of the proposed building. Mr. Kroeger went over previous planning efforts in the area. In 2019 the West Dayton Neighborhoods Vision was completed that shows the proposed location of the police facility as light industrial. The 2023 Redevelopment “Dillon” Plan shows two buildings and a large parking lot on the site. In 2020 Planned Development-180 was established with the intent and purpose to: “encourage and support the comprehensive redevelopment of the historic Wright Company Factory site and surrounding parcels by adopting a Planned Development that supports a cohesive vision for the subject area that addresses form, design, and function while allowing for flexibility as development phases advance. The development standards contained herein shall apply to the above referenced parcels.” PD-180’s primary themes are properly addressing public rights-of-way with glazing and entrances, compatibility of design, and connectivity and circulation. Mr. Kroeger went over the Final Plan review criteria that involves circulation. West Land Use Board voted to recommend approval of the application as submitted. The board noted concerns regarding the appearance of the north façade and the gated area of the parking lot. Other public input has included support for the project from the owners of 21 Abbey Ave. Planning staff recommends approval of the police facility at this location. Staff wants to know: if Plan Board considers the updates to the plan since the work session sufficient visual interest to mitigate the lack of an entryway or additional glazing; if there should be a treelawn separating the sidewalk from Abbey as it does further south next to the library; if Plan Board would like to consider staff review and approval of a landscaping plan; how Plan Board is thinking about the connection of the site to future development; and  City of Dayton Page 2 City Plan Board Summary Minute Record July 9, 2024 how the east-west drive might provide more accessibility to the public by way of a sidewalk and possible moving the fence. Mr. Scott asked if moving the fence addresses the issue of connectivity. Mr. Sauer asked if the parking lot could be shifted north and have a through connection from Abbey to Inland. Public Comments The applicant, Major Paul Saunders of the City of Dayton Police Department, said that their plan has expanded to include the development of Inland. Major Saunders explained that following the work session at Plan Board, the project team took into consideration all that had been shared by the board. He also explained the considerations, such as the necessary quick response of an armored vehicle and the unusual shape of the lot, that shaped the site and floor plan for the facility. Rick Willis, App Architecture, spoke to the input received from the board and community regarding the north façade of the proposed facility and pointed to the memorial/history walkway to improve the pedestrian experience around the site. Mr. Willis said that the landscape plan will exceed the minimum requirements of the Zoning Code. Mr. Willis showed additional renderings that were completed to show the approach to the property from the east and the viewshed to the Wright Factory from the west. A rendering of the facility at night shows how the facility will be lit and that the windows on the north façade will not be blacked out. Mr. Willis spoke to the development of Inland that will now be part of the project. The proposal shows two-way traffic on Inland with five-foot sidewalks on either side. Addressing Mr. Sauer’s question about the shifting of the parking lot, Mr. Willis said that yes, the parking will be shifted to the north so that there will be a connection from Abbey to Inland across the southern line of the property. The sidewalk and curb will be repaired along Abbey and West Third. Mr. Sauer asked for clarification on the ability to provide a treelawn. Mr. Willis said they had been instructed to maintain the existing curb and sidewalk. Mr. Willis said that there will be a generous treelawn along the Abbey, West Third, and Inland sides of the property. Mr. Sauer said that the board would want to see a final plan that shows the discussed landscaping and pedestrian connections. Because of the construction timeline, the west portion of the site plan needed to be prioritized. Ms. Lovelace stated that she originally did not like that the back of the building was along West Third and that it felt like the facility was turning its back on the community. She likes the changes to the north façade and said that it seems more friendly. Ms. Lovelace asked for clarification as to why the front of the building could not be located on Third Street. Mr. Willis said the design is based on the function of the building and where the uses are located inside the building. He stated that he had studied the Dayton Metro Library West Branch located to the south of the property, and he noticed that the pedestrian entrance to the property came from Abbey. Ms. Lovelace asked if the floor plan could be flipped, and Mr. Willis replied that no, the police need to be able to quickly access the parking lot that is to the south of the building. Ms. Schenking stated that she likes the sidewalk, historical pylons, and the name of the building on the north façade. Ms. Schenking asked why the glass on the north façade windows is so dark and whether more windows could be added below the shown windows. Mr. Willis explained that the rendering shows the glazing darker than it will appear in real life.  City of Dayton Page 3 City Plan Board Summary Minute Record July 9, 2024 Mr. Sauer said that the entrance to the facility should be located at the corner of Abbey and West Third and that West Third should have as much traffic as Abbey. Mr. Scott said that this is about the law and the code that the board is to follow, adding that the issue of the entrance location was brought up at the work session. Mr. Scott asked for clarification that Mr. Willis was told that they could not do a treelawn as exists at the library. Mr. Willis said that they were told to repair the existing curb and sidewalk. Mr. Kroeger explained that the stipulations of the original funding source that said to repair the existing curb and sidewalk were made before additional funding became available that could potentially be used to do a treelawn as exists at the library. Mr. Scott clarified that at the work session, the board had expressed desire for a connection from Abbey to Inland not just for the police, but also for the public. Mr. Willis stated that yes, with the recent addition of funding and planned development of Inland, they will shift the parking lot, fencing, and gates and provide connection for the public from Abbey to Inland. Ms. Schenking requested to see the site plan again at a later date. Becky Gaytko, DPD retiree, explained how the facility is functioning as a catalyst for the area and the history of past attempts to develop the site. Ms. Gaytko talked about the security needs of the building. Kasey Princell, 21 Abbey Ave., expressed his support as a commercial neighbor of the property. Mr. Princell stated that he is a pilot and likes the design of the building, which is evocative of an aileron. Ken Marcellus, representing the West Land Use Board, stated that the standards for the planned development that was approved for this area does not say “except for a police station” and asks that the standards be taken into consideration. Mr. Marcellus stated that the north façade and the gated parking lot do not give the impression that the neighborhood is welcome or trusted. Board Discussion The board discussed changes that could be made to the windows and the floor plan that could make the building more welcoming from West Third. Mr. Willis stated that moving the front door closer to West Third would move it further from the parking lot, and that may have an effect on people trying to get into the police facility quickly from the parking lot. Mr. Sauer asked if anyone is taking the bus or riding a bike to the police facility. Mr. Willis said that he does not know. Ms. Lovelace asked if there could be a second entrance. Major Saunders stated that the function of the building is the most important aspect and that most people are not coming to the police facility for public meetings, but rather they are coming when they are in distress, and so the location of the entrance, which also serves as a safe room, must be able to be accessed as quickly as possible. Major Saunders referred to the police facility on Salem, and Mr. Sauer pointed out that the entrance to that building is at the corner of Salem and Superior. Mr. Sauer clarified that he is not suggesting any changes to the function of the building but remains concerned, as do members of the public who are in support of the project, about how the building addresses West Third. Major Saunders stated that they have heard those concerns and taken steps to address them. He also stated that the proposed plan will be a vast improvement over the current state of the site. Major Saunders added that he does not want to get behind schedule on the project because of the expirations on the funding sources.  City of Dayton Page 4 City Plan Board Summary Minute Record July 9, 2024 Ms. Schenking stated that she likes Mr. Sauer’s suggestion that site plan come back before Plan Board with the treelawn and sidewalk reflecting what is next to the library. She also likes Mr. Willis’s description of the changes to the parking lot and the gates. Ms. Schenking believes that the windows on the north façade need to be as clear as possible and that another band of windows needs to be added. In the interest of the project’s timeline, Ms. Schenking would suggest that the applicant could work with City staff to achieve the desires of the board. Mr. Kroeger replied that administrative review of the site plan would be workable but that he has concerns about approving changes to the north façade with the direction that is currently available. With further discussion, Mr. Kroeger stated that if the direction is to explore options and do the best we can, staff will do that. The board discussed the options for softening the appearance of the north façade. Ms. Hanauer stated that thinking of the building as emulating part of an aircraft has helped her appreciate the aerodynamic aspect of the north façade as it is shown in the current renderings, especially when taking into account the aviation heritage of the area and the proximity to the Wright Factory site. Mr. Sauer asked about the possibility of adding a mural to the north façade. Mr. Willis added that the design commitment to the City of Dayton included energy efficiency and so fewer windows are proposed on the north façade. The degree of glazing will be as minimal as the energy code will allow. Mr. Sauer asked if there is space for bike parking, and Mr. Willis replied that yes, there is ample space for bike parking. Mr. Willis added that EV charging is also part of the plan. Mr. Sauer said he would like to add bike parking as required by the code and asked if a bench should be added to the history walk. Board Action A motion was made by Mr. Sauer, seconded by Ms. Schenking, and carried to approve Case PLN2024- 00175 subject to the following conditions: 1. Submit plan(s) to staff of the City of Dayton Planning Division for review including the following: a. A treelawn shall be located between Abbey Avenue and the public sidewalk to closely match the same arrangement found at the Dayton Metro Library west branch, just south of the subject property. b. The east-west access drive connecting Abbey Avenue to future Inland Avenue (the proposed north-south road bisecting the overall PD) shall directly connect these roads uninterrupted by a fence or gate, and a sidewalk shall be installed on at least one side of the east-west drive. c. Proposed landscaping, including type and locations trees, grasses, and other vegetation. d. To the extent feasible, a treelawn shall be included along future Inland Avenue. 2. A bike rack in compliance with RCGO 150.700.13 shall be installed that is able to accommodate at least six bicycles. 3. At least one bench shall be installed to the north or northwest of the building along the proposed “historical walk” 4. Allow the highest degree of light through the northern band of windows on the north face of the building by limited tint, as practical and feasible. 5. Work with Planning Division Staff to add visual interest that will “soften” the appearance of the north face of the building. (continued on next page)  City of Dayton Page 5 City Plan Board Summary Minute Record July 9, 2024 Mr. William Allen Excused Mr. Matt Sauer Yes Ms. Leslie Lovelace Yes Ms. Ann Schenking Yes Ms. Rosalyn Miller Excused Mr. Greg Scott Yes Ms. Geraldine Pegues Excused Minutes approved by the City Plan Board on August 13, 2024. Jennifer Hanauer, Secretary City Plan Board