City Council Agendas & Packets
Regular MeetingEast Grand Forks, MN · October 22, 2024
Minutes
APPROVED MINUTES
OF THE WORK SESSION
CITY OF EAST GRAND FORKS
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2024 – 5:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER:
The Work Session of the East Grand Forks City Council for Tuesday, October 22, 2024 was called to
order by Council President Olstad at 5:00 P.M.
CALL OF ROLL:
On a Call of Roll the following members of the East Grand Forks City Council were present: Mayor Steve
Gander, Council President Mark Olstad, Council Vice-President Tim Riopelle, Council Members
Clarence Vetter, Ben Pokrzywinski, Dale Helms, Brian Larson, and Karen Peterson.
Staff Present: Karla Anderson, Finance Director; Jeff Boushee, Fire Chief; Maggie Brockling, Economic
Development Director; Steve Emery, City Engineer; Ron Galstad, City Attorney; Paul Gorte, Economic
Development Director; Michael Hedlund, Police Chief, Charlotte Helgeson, Library Director; Reid
Huttunen, City Administrator; Jeremy King, Parks and Recreation Superintendent; Megan Nelson, City
Clerk; and Jason Stordahl, Public Works Director.
DETERMINATION OF A QUORUM:
The Council President Determined a Quorum was present.
1. Request to Name New Outdoor Rink & Add Sponsorship Signage – Jeremy King
Mr. King told the Council the Blue Line Club was requesting approval to name the new outdoor rink the
Jim Bradshaw rink because of his sponsorship towards the construction of the new rink. He stated Mr.
Bradshaw was the owner of Strata Construction and was the largest sponsor of the project. He explained
how there was not a current naming policy in place but previously things had been named to recognize
the largest donor to a project. He added the Blue Line Club would also like to add sponsorship signage
on the outside of the Blue Line Club Arena and there would not be any cost to the City. He stated the
recommendation would be approving the naming and the sponsorship signage. There were no questions.
This item will be referred to a City Council Meeting for action.
2. Consider Improvements to the Greensite – Jason Stordahl
Mr. Stordahl stated the greensite location was running out of space, there were more people using it, and
it would be beneficial to add additional concrete. He explained they were ordering roll offs so residents
could dump leaves and branches in them instead of on the ground and the added concrete would help to
have the water flow away from the property. He commented on how they had looked at different sites
around the city, different layouts within the greensite, and how they might be dumping snow behind the
greensite due to the improvements in LaFave Park. He said they would like to request to have plans and
specifications for an expansion area at the greensite. He said they would not be able to pay for it at this
time based on the current refuse fund balance, but staff had been reviewing greensite fees, how there are
Work Session October 22, 2024
issues with the snow, trying to keep the gate functioning, and not having people get stuck inside the fenced
in area.
Mr. Stordahl said they had looked at other gate configurations but not having a gate was better than what
they currently have and there were cameras set up that they check if there was a violation. He said the
cameras were good but there would need to be a reason to look at them. He stated the idea was to have
no gate and charge all of the residents that would be included in the refuse fee. He said if nothing changed,
they would be losing money each year so they would be coming back with a new rate structure and refuse
rates needed to be raised as well. He reviewed how many people were using the space but for now they
were asking for approval for the preparation of plans and specifications for the greensite. He asked for
questions.
Council member Larson asked if they would be able to make it one way in and one way out to help with
the congestion of the dumping area. Mr. Stordahl said that had been discussed and that would not be
needed if they used roll offs because people would be backing in between the dumpsters but that would
be the goal. Discussion followed about what the layout would be if roll offs were added, how the roll offs
were low enough so they might be able to get of the ramps, and how there currently was no storm drain
in place so that would need to be added. Council member Vetter said he was in favor of paving and
cleaning things up, he was not sure that the roll offs would be used because of current practices, and he
would like to see this become a true recycling center where people knew they could utilize the materials
from this space. He asked to have the wood chipped instead of hauling it away so residents could pick
them up. Mr. Stordahl said they had talked with other cities about their process, it would require
monitoring of a staff member, chipping was labor intensive, so it was considered, and they would be able
to catch people that just dumped branches and items on the ground. He said if the Council wanted to
continue allowing people to dump on the ground, they would consider it. Discussion followed about the
costs for cleaning out the greensite compared to having a person there, a chipper would require two people
to be onsite, Public Works would not be able to be down a person every day, and it was a good idea but
they were not sure how to make it work.
Council member Helms asked if they should get a vacuum like Grand Forks, which could help. Mr.
Stordahl said they had looked into a similar system, it would be a good service for residents, and a lot of
funds were spent on spring and fall clean-up so reducing it to only one clean-up would help. He added it
was something he was going to propose to the Council along with the rate increases. Council President
Olstad said he had been asking Mr. Stordahl about this for some time to make things better. Council
member Pokrzywinski said he had concerns about the roll off dumpsters, on weekends there was a line of
vehicles waiting to dump things off in the greensite, and it would take more time to shovel things into the
roll offs. He added he did see a value of having them but was not sure about the usability of them. There
were no further questions.
This item will be brought back to a future meeting.
3. Request to Prepare Plans & Specifications for 17th Ave SE Sidewalk Extension – Steve Emery
& Reid Huttunen
Mr. Emery stated a request was received for a sidewalk connection from 17th Avenue SE to the Bygland
Road sidewalk. He explained because of the location a culvert would be needed and listed possible
funding sources to cover the costs of the project. He said it was being brought forward for discussion and
to get direction from the Council. Council Vice-President Riopelle asked who would keep this sidewalk
2|Page
Work Session October 22, 2024
cleaned. Mr. Huttunen said since it would be located in the right-of-way and staff already cleaned the
sidewalks to the middle school on this section of Bygland Road, so it would be done by staff. Council
member Larson said it would be expensive but helpful for residents as well as pull pedestrians away from
the busy intersection of Bygland Road and 13th Street. Council member Vetter said this was a good idea
and asked if there was an easement. Discussion followed about having to check on the easement, this
used to be a road, but it could have been vacated, how the property owner was in favor of the project, and
the area should be chosen to have the shortest sidewalk needed. Council member Pokrzywinski
commented the sidewalk should be kept short because people would leave the sidewalk to cut through a
different area. Council member Helms asked if pedestrians would be cutting across the cul-de-sac. Mr.
Emery said that was the idea because of the minimal traffic that utilized the cul-de-sac. Council member
Helms asked why they needed a 6-inch concrete sidewalk. Mr. Emery stated sometimes the ends of
sidewalks were driven on, it would not be the case in this area, so they could go with four inch for the
entire sidewalk.
This item will be brought back to a future meeting.
4. 2025 Raise Application for South End Bridge Planning Study – Reid Huttunen
Mr. Huttunen reminded the Council they had applied for the RAISE grant, the City did not get awarded
the grant, and had a chance to review the criteria on how to improve the application to be considered as a
highly recommended project or project of merit. He said the application needed to have scored high in at
least six of the categories, the application scored high in five of the categories, and all future applications
could help lock the project in as a project of merit going forward in future grant cycles if not awarded this
cycle. He stated the group that included the City, the City of Grand Forks, Grand Forks County, and Polk
County, would like to resubmit another application once the grant process reopens. He explained they
would have 90 days to apply once the process opened, the last grant request was for $7.5 million for
planning funds, he expected to apply for the same amount of funding, and asked to apply for the funding.
Mr. Huttunen told the Council SRF and their subcontractor would put the application together, they were
requesting an amended contract for the scope of work, there was still $53,000 that was unbilled from the
original contract, so it would be a change in scope while using the committed funds to complete the work.
He said the grant process would cost $35,753.41 for the grant planning and writing along with an
additional $8,610 that was authorized for any additional costs that was approved by staff otherwise it
would not be used. He stated those funds could be used in areas that might need additional work for the
application but would still be under the total amount of the remaining funds. Council President Olstad
asked if all parties had to approve the change in scope. Mr. Huttunen said yes and all of the other bodies
would have acted on this by the time the Council would be meeting on November 6th. Discussion followed
about how there many conversations with the other entities on moving forward and it seems to be favorable
at staff level. Council member Larson asked about strategies on how to improve the areas where the
application did not score high on. Mr. Huttunen said the effort was to review all eight criteria to ensure
they were able to score high in all categories. There were no further questions.
This item will be referred to a City Council Meeting for action.
5. 2025 Budget Update & Request for 2025 Law Enforcement Retention/Recruitment Bonuses
– Reid Huttunen
Mr. Huttunen said he had some general updates for the budget, the 2025 rates had not been received for
3|Page
Work Session October 22, 2024
health insurance, he was expecting to see the results during the week, and get organized to share the
information with staff so a final decision could be made to either stay with the current provider or make a
change to ICHRA. He said that decision would make a large impact on the 2025 budget. He added he
spoke with the Law Enforcement group about the retention and recruitment programs. He said if these
programs were extended in 2025, the recruitment program costs were already accounted for in the 2025
budget, but the retention bonuses were not included in the budget so the request was being made to extend
the MOU.
Council President Olstad said it was something that should be looked at and considered. He added
hopefully the answers would come regarding health insurance. Chief Hedlund said they did appreciate
the Council considering extending the retention program because he did think it was working. He stated
they were still struggling to hire and they did lose a person to emergency management which was what he
background was in. There were no other questions or comments.
ADJOURN:
A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER VETTER, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER LARSON, TO ADJOURN THE OCTOBER 22, 2024 WORK SESSION OF THE EAST
GRAND FORKS, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL AT 5:46 P.M.
Voting Aye: Riopelle, Helms, Olstad, Larson, Peterson, Vetter, and Pokrzywinski.
Voting Nay: None.
_______________________________________________
Megan Nelson, City Clerk
4|Page
Agenda
AGENDA
OF THE WORK SESSION
CITY OF EAST GRAND FORKS
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2024 – 5:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER:
CALL OF ROLL:
DETERMINATION OF A QUORUM:
1. Request to Name New Outdoor Rink & Add Sponsorship Signage – Jeremy King
2. Consider Improvements to the Green Site – Jason Stordahl
3. Request to Prepare Plans & Specifications for 17th Ave SE Sidewalk Extension – Steve Emery
& Reid Huttunen
4. 2025 Raise Application for South End Bridge Planning Study – Reid Huttunen
5. 2025 Budget Update & Request for 2025 Law Enforcement Retention/Recruitment Bonuses
– Reid Huttunen
ADJOURN:
Upcoming Meetings
Council Meeting – Wednesday, November 6, 2024 – Council Chambers – 5:00 PM
Work Session – Tuesday, November 12, 2024 – Training Room – 5:00 PM
Council Meeting – Tuesday, November 19, 2024 – Council Chambers – 5:00 PM
Work Session – Tuesday, November 26, 2024 – Training Room – 5:00 PM
Individuals with disabilities, language barriers or other needs who plan to attend the meeting and will need special accommodations
should contact Nancy Ellis, ADA Coordinator at (218)-773-2208. Please contact us at least 48 hours before the meeting to give our
staff adequate time to make arrangements. Also, materials can be provided in alternative formats for people with disabilities or with
limited English proficiency (LEP) by contacting the ADA Coordinator (218)-773-2208 five (5) days prior to the meeting.
1
AGENDA ITEM #_1______
Request for Council Action
Date: October 22, 2024
To: East Grand Forks City Council Mayor Steve Gander, Council President Mark Olstad, Vice-
President Tim Riopelle; Council members Clarence Vetter, Dale Helms, Brian Larson, Karen
Peterson, and Ben Pokrzywinski.
Cc: File
From: Jeremy King, Parks & Recreation
RE: Request from the Blue Line Club to name the New Outdoor Rink and add sponsorship
signage to the exterior of the Blue Line Arena to show appreciation for sponsors.
Background:
The Blue Line Club is requesting the City Council’s approval to name the new outdoor rink “The Jim
Bradshaw Outdoor Rink" in honor of Mr. Bradshaw's generous sponsorship toward the facility's
construction. Naming the rink after Mr. Bradshaw would be a meaningful way to recognize his
contribution. While the City does not currently have a formal policy for naming facilities, it has been
past practice to honor major donors or key organizers by naming projects or facilities after them.
Additionally, the Blue Line Club is seeking approval to place sponsorship signage on the exterior of the
Blue Line Arena. These signs will acknowledge and thank the sponsors who contributed to the rink
project. Their support has been vital, and we believe this recognition will strengthen community
involvement and partnership.
The design, installation and signage will come at no cost to the city. The Blue Line Club would plan to
have the signage installed before the winter season and will contract Custom Stripes for their
production and installation.
Budget Impact:
None.
Recommendation:
Approve the name "Jim Bradshaw Outdoor Rink" and the ability to hang sponsorship signage on the
exterior of the Blue Line Arena.
Enclosure:
Design proposal.
2
3
AGENDA ITEM #_2______
Request for Council Action
Date: 10/17/2024
To: East Grand Forks City Council Mayor Steve Gander, Council President Mark Olstad, Council
Vice-President Tim Riopelle, Council members Clarence Vetter, Ben Pokrzywinski, Dale Helms,
Brian Larson, and Karen Peterson.
Cc: File
From: Jason Stordahl-Public Works Director
RE: Green Site Improvement
Background: As more residents utilize the Green Site we are running out of space for leaves and
branches, and there is much traffic congestion for those entering and leaving the dumping area. On top of
this the leaf/branch drop off area is not paved, and it is very hard to maintain a decent driving/dumping
surface during wet times of the year.
To mitigate the issues with the Green Site we would like to expand and pave the leaf/branch dumping
area. We are asking that Council considers approving WSN Engineering to prepare plans and
specifications for the necessary Green Site Improvements. All funds for the improvements would come
from our Refuse Enterprise Fund.
Recommendations: Approve WSN Engineering to prepare plans and specifications for Green Site
Improvements.
-1-
4
ENGINEERS ESTIMATE
CONCRETE PAVING - BRUSH AREA OF YARDWASTE SITE
EAST GRAND FORKS, MN
ITEM PROJECT UNIT
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
1 Mobilization 1 LS $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00
2 Common Excavation 575 CU YD $ 8.00 $ 4,600.00
3 Remove Chain Link Fencing 226 LIN FT $ 8.00 $ 1,808.00
4 Geogrid Fabric 2077 SQ YD $ 5.00 $ 10,385.00
5 9" Aggregate Base (CV) 520 CU YD $ 60.00 $ 31,200.00
6 Reinforced Concrete Pavement 7.0" 2047 SQ YD $ 120.00 $ 245,640.00
7 Catch Basin with Casting Assembly 1 LS $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00
8 12" RCP STORM SEWER 25 LF $ 150.00 $ 3,750.00
8 Concrete Jersey Barriers 276 LIN FT $ 200.00 $ 55,200.00
9 Common Topsoil Borrow 60 CU YD $ 25.00 $ 1,500.00
10 Turf Establishment 615 SQ YD $ 6.00 $ 3,690.00
Subtotal Construction $385,273.00
Engineering (P/S & Const Admin / Inpsection) $38,527.30
Contingencies (10%) $38,527.30
Total Project Cost $423,800.30
Concrete Pavement (163'x113')
10' Jersey Barrier (32" High) - $1100.00 Each Material Only (6000 LB Each)
5
AGENDA ITEM #_3______
Request for Council Action
Date: October 22, 2024
To: East Grand Forks City Council Mayor Steve Gander, Council President Mark Olstad, Council
Vice-President Tim Riopelle, Council members Clarence Vetter, Ben Pokrzywinski, Dale
Helms, Brian Larson, and Karen Peterson.
Cc: File
From: Steve Emery, City Engineer
Reid Huttunen, City Administrator
RE: Request to prepare Plans & Specification for 17th Ave SE Sidewalk Extension
Background:
The City has received a couple of requests from residents to consider adding a sidewalk connection
at the end of the cul-de-sac at 17th Ave SE, connecting the existing 17th Ave SE sidewalk to the
sidewalk along Bygland Rd SE. This sidewalk extension will provide a safer pedestrian connection
between the neighborhood, Southpoint Elementary School, and Central Middle School.
Widseth has completed a desktop estimate of the sidewalk extension at an estimated price of
$39,781.50. It is possible the City will need to work with the private property owner to take an
easement for the proposed sidewalk location.
Budget Impact:
In FY2025, the City will is expecting to receive an additional $40,218.00 in Transportation
Advancement Funds from MNDOT. This is a new funding source which MNDOT began dispersing in
2024, and this project is an eligible use of these funds.
Recommendation:
Authorize Widseth to prepare Plans & Specifications for the 17th Ave SE Sidewalk extension.
Enclosures:
17th Ave SE Sidewalk Extension Engineers estimate
Location picture depicting approximate location of the sidewalk
6
ENGINEERS ESTIMATE
17th AVE SE SIDEWALK EXTENSION
EAST GRAND FORKS, MN
9/24/2024
ITEM PROJECT UNIT
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
1 Mobilization 1 LS $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00
2 Traffic Control 1 LS $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00
3 Remove Curb & Gutter 15 LF $ 45.00 $ 675.00
4 Topsoil Stripping 35 CY $ 25.00 $ 875.00
5 Common Borrow (CV) 135 CY $ 25.00 $ 3,375.00
6 20" CMP Arch Pipe Culvert 70 LF $ 75.00 $ 5,250.00
7 20" CMP Aprons 2 EA $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00
8 Aggregate Base (CV) 3 CY $ 150.00 $ 450.00
9 Concrete Curb & Gutter 15 LF $ 100.00 $ 1,500.00
8 4" Concrete Sidewalk (75'x5') 375 SF $ 18.00 $ 6,750.00
9 6" Concete Sidewalk (10'x5') 50 SF $ 30.00 $ 1,500.00
10 Topsoil Borrow (LV) 50 CY $ 75.00 $ 3,750.00
11 Turf Establishment 425 SY $ 16.00 $ 6,800.00
12 Bio-Rolls 40 LF $ 6.00 $ 240.00
Subtotal Construction $36,165.00
Construction Contingencies (10%) $3,616.50
Total Project Cost $39,781.50
7
8
AGENDA ITEM #_4______
Request for Council Action
Date: October 22, 2024
To: East Grand Forks City Council Mayor Steve Gander, Council President Mark Olstad, Council
Vice-President Tim Riopelle, Council members Clarence Vetter, Ben Pokrzywinski, Dale
Helms, Brian Larson, and Karen Peterson.
Cc: File
From: Reid Huttunen, City Administrator
RE: FY2025 RAISE Application for So. End Bridge Planning Study
Background:
In June 2024, the City of East Grand Forks was notified by the USDOT that it was not selected for a
FY2024 RAISE Grant, which would have funded $7.5 Million for continued Study and Pre-Design of a
new East Grand Forks/Grand Forks Red River Bridge Crossing.
In September 2024, we had an opportunity to participate in a USDOT Application Debrief and were
provided with a summary of how our application scored.
In total USDOT received 1048 applications requesting $13 Billion in project funding. A total of 144
applications were funded nationwide (planning and capital projects) worth $1.8 Billion.
RAISE Grant applications are scored on eight (8) project merit criteria. In order for a project to
become eligible for funding, an application must be scored as “Highly Recommended.” Highly
Recommended projects are those that score “High” in at least six (6) of eight (8) project criteria.
In our FY2024 Application, we scored High in 5 of 8 criteria (listed below). Once an application scores
as highly recommended, it does not guarantee funding, but the application does become considered
a “project of merit” and the scoring is locked in for any future application periods and is
automatically passed into the next round of application review (financial & project readiness review).
Project Criteria - SCORE
1. Safety - HIGH
2. Environmental Sustainability - MEDIUM
3. Quality of Life - HIGH
4. Improves Mobility and Community Connectivity - HIGH
5. Economic Competitiveness and Opportunity - MEDIUM
6. State of Good Repair - HIGH
7. Partnership & Collaboration - HIGH
8. Innovation - MEDIUM
9
AGENDA ITEM #_______
The RAISE Grant will soon be opening the FY2025 round of application. The Notice of Funding
Opportunity is expected to be released in late October/early November and the application period
will be open for 90 days from the date of release.
We have continued discussion and meetings with our partners in this bridge effort, City of Grand
Forks, Grand Forks County and Polk County. At a staff level, we feel we should continue our urgency
in building on our FY2024 application and re-apply for the FY2025 opportunity.
We have requested a proposal for grant writing services from SRF Consulting including a scope of
work that will review all aspects of our previous application and look for areas of improvement. Extra
time and attention will be focused on the three Project Merit Criteria which were scored medium:
those being Environmental Sustainability, Economic Competitiveness & Opportunity, and Innovation.
As of Friday, October 18th I have not received the written contract amendment proposal from SRF. It
is expected that I’ll have it before the City Council Work Session on 10/22/2024. We’ll be prepared to
present the formal contract proposal and budget considerations to the City Council at the Work
Session.
Recommendation & Next Steps:
Approve the proposed contract amendment for SRF Consulting to support grant writing for the
FY2025 USDOT RAISE Grant
Enclosures:
SRF Consulting Contract Amendment #2 – not yet received as of 10/18/2024
10
AGENDA ITEM #_5______
Request for Council Action
Date: October 22, 2024
To: East Grand Forks City Council Mayor Steve Gander, Council President Mark Olstad, Council
Vice-President Tim Riopelle, Council members Clarence Vetter, Ben Pokrzywinski, Dale
Helms, Brian Larson, and Karen Peterson.
Cc: File
From: Reid Huttunen, City Administrator
RE: 2025 Budget Update and request for 2025 Law Enforcement Retention/Recruitment Bonuses
Background:
The Preliminary Budget for 2025 has been set at a 7% General Levy increase. Total Property Tax Levy
being at $7,415,188.
At the proposed budget, Expenditures over Revenues is at $234,484.00
A few items for consideration when looking at our 2025 Budget Outlook.
Health Insurance: This remains the biggest unanswered question in our 2025 Budget.
- BCBS Group Health Insurance:
o 2024 Annual Premium: $1,472,505.00
o BCBS 2025 Renewal Estimate: $1,722,832.00
o Increase from 2024: $250,327.00
- Individual Coverage HRA (ICHRA):
o As of 10/18/2024, the City has not received the 2025 Proposed Rates and Insurance
Plans that will be available in the Individual Marketplace. We are being told that we’ll
receive these the week of 10/21/2024.
o As soon as we receive the rates, we’ll share them with employees for their review.
o Using the anticipated 2025 ICHRA rates, we expect the total annual premium to be a
reduction from City’s 2024 Group Premium.
Law Enforcement Recruitment & Retention bonuses:
- The City & Law Enforcement Labor Services (LELS) have MOU’s in place for 2024 to offer
bonuses for Recruitment & Relocation of new officers, as well as a retention bonus for our
current Police Department staff.
- The Recruitment & Relocation bonuses are included in the 2025 budget at approximately
$15,000 for the year.
- LELS has requested that the retention bonus be renewed and continued in 2025. This is not
included in the 2025 preliminary budget. Should the City Council decide to renew the MOU
for 2025, we’ll need to increase the budget by $41,500.
11
AGENDA ITEM #_______
Next Steps:
- Seeking discussion and direction on the 2025 Budget.
- Does the City Council support continuing the LELS Recruitment and Retention bonuses in
2025
- We expect to receive final Health Insurance premium rates the week of 10/21/2024 and will
plan continued Budget Discussion.
Enclosures:
2025 Budget Brief Summary at a 7% levy increase
2024 LELS Recruitment & Retention Bonus MOU’s
12
CITY OF EAST GRAND FORKS, MINNESOTA
GENERAL FUND
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
September 17, 2024
CHANGE OVER
Actual Actual Budget Budget 2024 BUDGET
2022 2023 2024 2025 AMOUNT %
REVENUES/SOURCES
1 Property Tax Levy* $ 5,646,759 $ 6,562,480 $ 6,930,081 $7,415,188 $ 485,107 7.0%
2 Franchise & Other Taxes 1,702,729 1,667,902 1,567,683 1,608,397 $ 40,714 2.6%
3 Licenses & Permits 107,019 124,848 116,275 114,375 $ (1,900) -1.6%
4 Intergovernmental 2,943,524 2,657,902 2,839,577 2,884,525 $ 44,948 1.6%
5 Charges for Services 1,431,641 1,455,808 1,451,180 1,454,454 $ 3,274 0.2%
6 Fines & Forfeits 80,311 75,478 118,000 68,500 $ (49,500) -41.9%
7 Other Revenues 179,633 222,532 38,500 110,400 $ 71,900 186.8%
8 Other Financing Sources 133,285 154,239 266,600 315,000 $ 48,400 18.2%
9 Total Revenues/Other Sources $ 12,224,903 $ 12,921,190 $ 13,327,897 $ 13,970,839 $ 642,943 4.8%
10 Reserved Used/Excess 341,734 150,559 174,064 (174,064) -100.0%
Total Available Resources $ 12,566,637 $ 13,071,749 $ 13,501,961 $ 13,970,839 $ 468,879 3.5%
EXPENDITURES/USES
Current:
11 General Government $ 1,617,419 $ 1,427,788 $ 1,508,738 $ 1,630,170 $ 121,431 8.0%
12 Police 3,115,653 3,290,065 3,667,614 3,827,711 $ 160,097 4.4%
13 Fire 1,367,280 1,403,004 1,516,159 1,582,164 $ 66,005 4.4%
14 Other Public Safety 188,590 190,122 204,534 252,669 $ 48,135 23.5%
15 Public Works 1,696,823 1,563,719 1,766,810 1,799,145 $ 32,335 1.8%
16 Recreation & Culture 1,931,265 1,886,678 2,168,822 2,268,211 $ 99,389 4.6%
17 Community Development 45,526 26,205 66,600 65,000 $ (1,600) -2.4%
18 Library 651,803 680,274 785,008 810,605 $ 25,597 3.3%
19 Senior Center 124,145 133,662 146,036 146,584 $ 548 0.4%
20 Other Expenditures 381,572 440,559 427,009 457,000 $ 29,991 7.0%
11,120,077 11,042,077 12,257,331 12,839,260 581,929 4.7%
Capital Outlay & Other Uses:
21 General Government - -
22 Police 71,491 95,823 116,500 212,789 $ 96,289 82.7%
23 Fire 45,721 - - - $ -
24 Public Works 15,295 - - - $ -
25 Street Reconstruction 243,218 256,062 275,000 280,000 $ 5,000 1.8%
26 Recreation & Culture 20,478 - 60,000 55,000 $ (5,000) -8.3%
27 Other Expenditures 130,107 90,636 235,000 285,000 $ 50,000 21.3%
28 Debt Service 91,516 - 90,000 120,000 $ 30,000 33.3%
29 Other Financing Uses 828,734 567,818 443,597 413,275 $ (30,322) -6.8%
1,446,560 1,010,339 1,220,097 1,366,064 145,967 12.0%
30 $ 12,566,636 $ 12,052,416 $ 13,477,428 $ 14,205,324 $ 727,895 5.4%
Revenues/Sources Over (Under)
Expenditures and chg Fund Balance $ 0 $ 1,019,333 $ 24,532 $ (234,484)
Budgeted Fund Balance Reserve 457,456
Payroll increase 508,711
13
14
15
16
17
18
Get email alerts for East Grand Forks
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.