Planning Commission Meeting
Regular MeetingEscondido, CA · April 26, 2016
Minutes
4669 Planning Commission 04/2 6/1 6
CITY OF ESCONDIDO
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ESCONDIDO PLANNING COMMISSION
April 26, 2016
The meeting of the Escondido Planning Commission was called to order at
7:00 p.m. by Vice-chairman McQuead in the City Council Chambers, 201 North
Broadway, Escondido, California.
Commissioners present: Bob McQuead, Vice-chairman; Michael Cohen,
Commissioner; Gregory Johns, Commissioner; Don Romo, Commissioner; James
Spann, Commissioner and Stan Weiler, Commissioner
Commissioners absent: Jeffery Weber, Chairman.
Staff present: Bill Martin, Interim Director of Community Development; Jay Paul,
Associate Planner; Adam Phillips, Deputy City Attorney; Christopher McKinney,
Utilities Director; Owen Tunnell, Principal Engineer; and Ty Paulson, Minutes
Clerk.
MINUTES:
Moved by Commissioner Spann, seconded by Commissioner Weiler, to approve
the minutes of the April 12, 2016 meeting. Motion carried. Ayes: McQuead,
Spann, Cohen and Weiler. Noes: None. Abstained: Johns and Romo. (4-0-2)
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS — Received.
FUTURE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS — None.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS — None.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — PHG 16-0004:
REQUEST: A Modification to an existing Conditional Use Permit for Redwood
Terrace Retirement Community to allow their main campus facility to replace their
aging backup generator with a new 400 kW generator. The proposed generator
would be installed in an enclosure to be built in an existing landscape area along
Planning Commission 04/26/16 4670
=7-
West 13th Avenue near the intersection with South Tulip Street. The zoning of the
subject property is R-2-8 with a U2 General Plan designation. The proposal also
includes the adoption of the environmental determination prepared for the project.
LOCATION: The main campus at 710 W. 13th Avenue (APN 236-073-01-00) is
6.27 acres in size and its location is bordered by West 12th Avenue, South
Redwood Street, West 13th Avenue and South Tulip Street.
Paul Bingham, Associate Planner, referenced the staff report and noted staff
issues were whether the proposal was consistent with Zoning Code standards for
standby generators, and whether the changes were aesthetically appropriate for
the neighborhood. Staff recommended approval based on the following: 1) The
proposed 400 kW emergency backup generator would not create any adverse
noise or air-quality impacts since it would be located in a landscaped area and
equipped with appropriate noise attenuation devices and walls to ensure
compliance with the City's Noise Ordinance. The generator would also be in
conformance with State air-quality requirements due to the limited hours of
operation; and 2) The proposed enclosure to house the generator will be partially
integrated into the existing landscaped slope and further enhanced with additional
landscaping. Staff feels the enclosure of CMU block stuccoed and painted to
match the adjacent campus buildings and enhanced with further landscaping will
adequately screen the equipment from public view.
Discussion ensued regarding a clarification of the proposed fuel containment for
the equipment.
ACTION:
Moved by Commissioner Spann, seconded by Commissioner Weiler, to approve
staffs recommendation. Motion carried unanimously. (6-0)
2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — PHG 15-0021:
REQUEST: The project involves a Conditional Use Permit for the development of
a city facility designed to provide advanced treatment for recycled water produced
at the City of Escondido's Hale Avenue Resource Recovery Facility (HARRF) for
agricultural uses. The facility would utilize membrane filtration [i.e., microfiltration
(MF) or ultrafiltration (UF) membranes] and reverse osmosis (RO) technologies
sized for a total production capacity of 2.0 million gallons per day (mgd). The
project consists of two separate buildings (approximately 14,440 SF Chemical
Storage Building and an approximately 21,775 SF MF/RO Process Building) up to
approximately 37 feet in height (top of ridgeline of sloping roofs). The buildings
4671 Planning Commission 04/26/16
would contain a variety of equipment, pumps, electrical, control and storage rooms.
The MF/RO facility would be designed to accommodate the installation of future
equipment to provide an additional 1.0 mgd of production capacity. Underground
storage tanks (90,000-gallon feed tank, 163,000-gallon inter-process tank, and a
970,000-gallon product storage tank) also would be installed, along with various
above-ground pipes and holding tank(s). Primary access would be provided from
E. Washington Avenue, with secondary access to El Norte Parkway. The
perimeter of the site would be secured by a combination of new, six-foot-high
masonry walls and decorative open fencing. The project also includes a 1,500 kW
emergency backup generator. The proposal also includes the adoption of the
environmental determination prepared for the project.
LOCATION: The 3.25-acre project site is located within the City of Escondido,
County of San Diego, generally located on the northern side of E. Washington
Avenue and southern side of El Norte Parkway, west of intersection of Washington
Avenue/El Norte Parkway, east of Citrus Avenue, addressed as 2512 E.
Washington Avenue (APN 225-270-54).
Commissioner Cohen recused himself from Item 2 and left the room.
Jay Paul, Associate Planner, referenced the staff report and noted staff issues
were whether the proposed facility would have any adverse visual, noise and
compatibility impacts to surrounding residential uses, and whether dedicated
striped on-site parking would be necessary for the facility. Staff recommended
approval based on the following: 1) The buildings have been designed and
located to address any potential visual and compatibility impacts to surrounding
uses, with appropriate setbacks from adjacent residential properties. The majority
of the MF/RO equipment and systems would be housed inside of residential-like
buildings designed to complement the existing neighborhood and reduce
equipment noise levels. Perimeter landscape planters and new six-foot-high
masonry block walls would be installed to provide additional screening, separation
and noise attenuation; and 2) Section 33-767 of the Zoning Code allows the
Commission to waive parking for uses with limited number of persons that would
utilize the facility (i.e., utility or corporation storage yards or other similar uses).
Staff believes that dedicated striped parking spaces would not be necessary for
this facility due to the limited number of employees that would be present at the
site at any one time. Employees on site would be infrequent and appropriate areas
are available on site to accommodate city vehicles and any delivery trucks.
Commissioner Weiler questioned whether odors would be an issue. Mr. Paul
replied in the negative.
11
Planning Commission 04/26/16 4672
Chris McKinney, Utilities Director, noted that the recycled water coming into the
facility was odorless. He also noted that the ultimate disposition of the treated
water would preferably be to pump it into Lake Dixon if all required permits could
be secured.
Discussion ensued regarding a clarification of the distance between the block walls
of the subject property and the facility as well as the proposed location for future
expansions. Additional discussions ensued regarding a clarification of the pad
elevations as well as containment and spillage procedures.
Kevin Davis, Project Design Engineer, provided an overview of the water
treatment chemicals that would be used on the site.
Vice-chairman McQuead questioned whether onsite spills could make it to the
street. Mr. Davis replied in the negative, noting that the secondary concrete
containment structure that was located onsite would mitigate any accidental spills.
Diane Belnap, Escondido, stated that her residence was in close proximity to the
subject site, noting her concern for her family being exposed to chemicals and
odors. She stated that her bedroom window would look down into the facility and
be subject to the facility's lights, noises, and odors. She felt the facility was too
industrial and not compatible with the residential area. She noted that the study
for the facility indicated that the noise, lighting, and odors would not be significant,
noting anything over zero would be significant to her and her neighbors. She also
felt her property value would be reduced. She then asked the Commissioners if
they would like the subject facility next to their residence.
Jack Barnhart, Escondido, felt the proposed location was inappropriate given its
proximity to residential homes. He felt a better location would be industrial and
closer to agriculture. He noted that he would not have purchased his property if he
knew this type of use would be allowed.
Barbara Warner, Escondido, noted that she lived off of Glen Meadow, noting that
she did not receive notice about the proposed project. She was opposed to the
proposed project, feeling it should be in a more suitable location. She expressed
her concern with being impacted by noise and pollutants, noting she currently had
lung issues. She also felt her property value would be reduced.
Leticia Nava, Escondido, noted she lived on the west side of the proposed facility
and was representing nine homeowners in the area who were opposed to the
project. She stated they were concerned with the facility storing hazardous
materials and creating more noise. She questioned whether the project could be
located in a non-residential zone that was more suitable such as a commercial
4673 Planning Commission 04/26/16
zone. She questioned when the CUP would be granted, and whether the noise
study would run concurrent with the CUP. She asked whether the noise study took
into consideration cumulative impacts of peak hour traffic on Washington Street
along with the facility's pumps and generator, and whether it had been made
public. She stated that they felt the existing sound levels were already higher than
the allowable standards. She asked if an earthquake study had been conducted
for the site as well as whether above ground storage tanks would be utilized. She
then asked the Commission if they would like the subject facility next to their
residence.
Commissioner Johns asked what the history of the zoning was for the subject
property. Mr. Paul noted that the zoning for the subject property was residential
with the subject use being allowed through a CUP. Commissioner Johns asked if
alternate locations were considered. Mr. McKinney replied in the affirmative and
noted the HARRF site could not be used due to not having sufficient space. He
also stated that the proposed site was selected due to being a good location for
distribution.
Commissioner Weiler asked whether the subject property was slated for a public
utility use in the past. Mr. McKinney noted that City Council was briefed on this
program in 2012 with the subject site being the preferred site for the past two and
a half years.
Commissioner Romo asked Mr. McKinney whether he was aware of how often
spills occurred that would impact the health of the community. Mr. McKinney
stated that he was not aware of any such situations. He also stated that the subject
facility would be designed with several layers of containment as well as chemical
tanks being located indoors.
Vice-chairman McQuead asked staff to comment on the seismic integrity of the
proposed structure. Mr. McKinney explained that the entire site would be
excavated and re-compacted down 16 feet in order to reduce issues with potential
earthquakes. Kevin Davis noted that the entire site, facility, and equipment would
be designed to meet the current seismic standards.
Vice-chairman McQuead asked if the main structure would be constructed like an
essential building similar to a police facility. Mr. Davis stated he did not have this
information but would find out. Vice-Chairman McQuead asked if the building
height was set by the height of the equipment inside. Mr. Davis replied in the
affirmative.
Commissioner Johns and staff discussed the proposed height of the perimeter
walls and the proposed landscaping.
Planning Commission 04/2 6/16 4674
Commissioner Weiler and staff discussed the proposed screening and size of the
outdoor equipment.
Discussion ensued regarding a clarification of the location for the pipeline from the
water treatment plant to the Hogback Reservoir tank.
Commissioner Spann questioned whether sites closer to Lake Dixon were
considered. Mr. McKinney replied in the affirmative and noted that locating the
facility close to Lake Dixon was only one of many factors involved in site selection.
Commissioner Romo and staff discussed alternative locations.
Vice-chairman McQuead referenced Page 8, No. 1 under the findings and
expressed his view that surrounding property values would be reduced.
Commissioner Spann concurred. He also felt the proposed structures looked
commercial and were too tall. He did not feel the project would be compatible with
the residential neighborhood.
Commissioner Johns felt that the landscaping and walls would be inadequate to
block the visual interruption, feeling the adjacent property values would be
reduced.
Commissioner Romo noted he recognized the need for the proposed facility, but
he was not convinced that the proposed location was the best site for the subject
facility.
Commissioner Johns motioned to approve staffs recommendation. There was no
second to the motion.
ACTION:
Moved by Vice-chairman McQuead, seconded by Commissioner Spann, to deny
the proposed Conditional Use Permit. Motion carried. Ayes: McQuead, Spann,
Weiler, Johns and Romo. Noes: None. Abstained: Cohen (5-0-1).
CURRENT BUSINESS — None.
ORAL COMMUNATIONS — None.
4675 Planning Commission 04/26/16
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Commissioner Spann expressed his enthusiasm with the looks of the new cellular
towers with the exception of an older one.
ADJOURNMENT:
Vice-chairman McQuead adjourned the meeting at 8:20 p.m. The next meeting
was scheduled for May 10, 2016, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 201
North Broadway, scondido, California.
Bil Marti , Secretary to the Escondido Ty Pauir p.
i Minutes Clerk
Planning Commission
Get email alerts for Escondido
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.