Muyni
← Back to Eugene

City of Eugene Human Rights Commission

Regular Meeting

Eugene, OR · September 15, 2015

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

City of Eugene Human Rights Commission MINUTES Tuesday, September 15, 2015 5:30 – 7:30 PM Meeting Atrium Building, Sloat Room, 99 W. 10th Avenue, Eugene Present: Human Rights Commissioners: Andrew Thomson, Ken Neubeck, Jennifer Frenzer, Edward Goehring, Edward McGlone, Arun Toke, Philip Carrasco, Chris Nunes, Bonnie Souza, Councilor Greg Evans Staff: Michael Kinnison and Jennifer Lleras Van Der Haeghen EPD Liaison: Lt. Jennifer Bills Minutes 1. Agenda/Minutes Review and Approval Agenda approval moved by A. Thomson, seconded by E. Goehring and approved unanimously. Minutes approval moved by E. Goehring, seconded by K. Neubeck and approved unanimously. 2. Public Comment – There were 3 requests for public comment. Mariah Leung - Expressed interest in having a table at International Human Rights Day in December as they were able to in 2010. She has concerns about not having been invited or present at the last event. Asked the HRC to see connection of local and international concerns regarding Human Rights Commission. Urge to work for Human Rights for all people including Pro-Palestine work. See handout. Jack Dresser – Follow up on what Mariah was saying. The reason given for not including us in past events is that this is not a local issue. Said that tax money is going to support Israel from Lane. Thinks the 3 million that is spent could be better spent here. He said that since 9/11 the FBI has been working to destroy the Occupy movement, a movement against neo-liberalism capitalism. All resistance movements now are being classified as terrorism. Majeska Seese-Green – Supported Mariah and asked that International Human Rights day be held at a location big enough for inclusive tabling. Tabling should not be limited to the people directly related to the work of HRC. Also wanted to share information about a non-profit she is starting, A Community Together – ACT. They received their 501c3 status this summer will be moving forward as such. Renewed membership in the USHRN and developing program around human rights in Lane County. ACT is 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 116, Eugene, OR 97401 541.682.5177 |ehroffice@ci.eugene.or.us | www.eugene-or.gov/hrc meant to be an organization can bring people together across all spectrums. Human Rights should be treated as a centrist thing because it is the law of the land and planet. 3. Support Request - None received 4. Smoke Free Downtown K. Neubeck provided context to why we were having this discussion: Topic came up last year in the Homelessness Work Group. The most relevant questions for the Work Group became a. Is this a Human Rights Issue? Or b. Is it purely a health issue? The outcome at the Work Group was that one person felt it was only a health issue, 7 others agreed and also asserted that it was a human rights issue as well. It was voted to be brought to the Human Rights Commission. There is currently not policy being proposed just discussions with stakeholders. The questions for the HRC are 1. Is this an Human Rights issue? 2. If yes, what position did the HRC want to take on it? Assistant City Manager Sarah Medary was present to share information. Ray Trata was also present as a consultant. Has a background in tobacco prevention, equity and homelessness issues.  From day one we have been trying to do this process in a different way, which has created new tension. This is because people want to see a draft to respond to and the City is trying to develop a draft with the input of the community.  There is not a draft policy at this time.  Have had several listening sessions, met with people one on one and several stakeholder events. Includes this meeting with HRC and another later this week with the Consumer Council from Shelter Care. All of this outreach will culminate in “Deal Points” to build from.  We’re trying to let the people and process drive the policy. Hope is that by the end of October we will have a draft policy. The soonest this could happen should it even move forward would be January.  Understand that without the right input these types of policies could be used to criminalize people, here to make sure we can have positive interactions. Councilor Evans explained that the reason he proposed this is because of the public health issues. It is the highest cause of death in our country, and costs millions to treat smoking related diseases. This is also a personal issue. He believes that this should not be a punitive approach but rather encourage smoking cessation programs. Part of the motivation is also because people are highly sensitive to second hand smoke and these folks have come to City Council to share their concern. Cigarette butts are another issue. In our environmental scope, rivers have piles and piles of tobacco debris. People are voluntarily cleaning this out of the rivers. There are collateral impacts to the individual, people around them and community in total.  Looking for an approach shaped by the community that looks to assist smokers into cessation programs. Instead of issuing a ticket offer smoking cessation program supported by Lane County and will not cost people anything out of pocket. To have a cleaner, healthier and safer environment. We should use a phased-in process for this. 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 116, Eugene, OR 97401 541.682.5177 | ehrcenter@ci.eugene.or.us | www.eugene-or.gov/hrc  Believe that the majority of smokers are housed. Strong public support for the ordinance and strategy to reduce impact of smoking. Not just in downtown but throughout the city. If we’re going to be a progressive community we need to hold public health at the highest levels. E. Goehring Moved to extend time by 10 mins, seconded by E McGlone. Passed unanimously. E. Goehring Personal connection to the issue. Have seen other cities try to do this work. Believes that this will cause dislocation of people who are smoking in downtown. Public health is more important than the business concerns. Do recognize that the unhoused people and others use tobacco to calm down. Encourage a first step be to escort people out of the area instead of ticketing. E. McGlone asks a question: Ken in work group it looks like the concern is about the enforcement. Was there conversation about smoking being a human right? K. Neubeck - smoking is not a human right. E. McGlone wants the focus to be on how enforcement should be developed. Major concern is about inequitable treatment of people under the law. As a former downtown resident I regularly dealt with the impact of smoke. Smoking is not a human right, does the city have an obligation to facilitate smoking, my guess is no. Important from a health perspective, human rights perspective. Support the ban and encourage the most human rights friendly approach to enforcement. J. Frenzer - Appreciate work and concern. I don’t have faith about fair enforcement. Don’t know what tool you’re talking about - policy or ordinance? Until services and housing are provided to the unhoused just don’t see how you can impose policies or ordinances in any way that we can respect their human rights. They have all of these needs unmet, we don’t have the resources to meet them. We have to step up in other ways to provide housing and basic needs, particularly with young people. Let’s address and put services in place before we start taking away and punishing people. C. Nunes – Attended one of the community conversations about this. Raised the question if the Police Department was the right tool for this issue or if Health Service Providers would better serve the need. One thing that was said in a small group was that once you put up a sign 99% of people will respect it. What we’re talking about is 1%. We’re talking about managing to the one percent. Want to be sure we’re aware of that. This would mean there is no police enforcement or rule. K. Nuebeck - We’re still talking about something we haven’t seen a draft of. K Nuebeck moved to table discussion on this and continue to stay engaged in the conversation between meetings. G. Evans seconded. Passed unanimously. 5. Work Plan and Quarterly Meetings Commission Input C. Nunes –Mayor and City Manager quarterly meetings are next week. This is a time to share what our plans are and to find out what they would like us to focus on. We’d like to bring any concerns 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 116, Eugene, OR 97401 541.682.5177 | ehrcenter@ci.eugene.or.us | www.eugene-or.gov/hrc that you all have. Do you have feedback on the work plan documents you have or any thoughts regarding the meetings? G. Evans – making sure we’re connecting to the 4j Equity Committee and other groups dealing with specific discrimination issues. Want to add a point to Action 2.3 as Task 4 to connect the 4J Equity Committee and other bodies serving. B. Souza – Suggests that Action 2.1 Task 2 meets that. G. Evans – Concerned it is too generic as written, and wants more specificity for that option. E. Goehring – One thing that might strengthen this is to host an annual Human Rights Summit. Just need to call it and have people help organizing it. Would allow people to come together to discuss Human Rights Issues once a year. G. Evans – One thing I see is that most hate crimes are either racially based or based on gender and perception of sexual orientation. Think that E. Goehring’s idea is great and highly appropriate to add. We need to determine the scope and capacity but would like to build something like this into the work plan. Looking at a one or two day summit might be good. K. Nuebeck – Action 2.3 Task 3 propose an event that promotes Human Rights, this idea could fit under that. E. Goehring – We could help to get some of the smaller non-profits connected with the larger. Would be tremendous to add this. A. Thompson – We need to address the changes to the Homelessness work plan items. E. Goehring moved to approve changes, K. Neubeck seconded. Approved unanimously. J. Frenzer – We work on these plans and develop our ideas to advise the City Council to the best of our ability and I would like to see them respond more. We didn’t get a work session we requested. Last night there was a room overflowing and the City Council didn’t respond. Believe the Council is remiss if they’re not going to be responsive. We’re not getting an opportunity to dialogue. K. Neubeck – Last October we sent a letter asking for work session with no response. When Councilors had a chance to speak last night, not one person said anything. I think it’s disrespectful and alienating. Think Chris and Andrew need to bring that up. G. Evans – Will note that going back to last Spring, Council there were 3 things that came up as priorities. Homelessness was at the top and I I suggested a joint work session between HRC and City Council on issue of homelessness encompassing shelter and. This is still on the table. Talked to City Manager a week ago to schedule this, supposed to be looking to between now and November. We need a longer facilitated conversation than a standard work session allows. If other people can push this idea with other councilors I would like to propose this again. A. Toke – I know the Mayor is interested in something like this. 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 116, Eugene, OR 97401 541.682.5177 | ehrcenter@ci.eugene.or.us | www.eugene-or.gov/hrc 6. Housing and Community Services Agency of Lane County Jacob Fox – ED of HACSA – We’re wanting to serve more special needs populations like folks coming out of Homelessness and who can supported by Sponsors. Paul Solomon, ED of Sponsors – This project is very special in that provides us an opportunity to provide long term housing for people who have criminal histories. HACSA and St. Vincent De Paul do help to provide this but there is still not enough housing for people. All of our beds are regularly booked 8-12 months in advance. We’re targeting seniors, people with disabilities and veterans for this site. Ela Kubok – We have established a Citizen Advisory Committee, working with Sponsors to find a forum for the neighborhood and community to understand what the project is, ask questions and increase involvement in process. We’re currently contacting elected officials and community members and would like the HRC to have one representative to be part of the committee. E. Goehring. Where is this? Ans – 14th and Oakpatch. It will be 6 buildings that will house staff from Sponsors, Lane County Parole and Probation and have a range of supports for clients on site. G. Evans – Can you speak to the engagement with neighbors to this point? Ans - We submitted an application to the State for low income tax credits awarded in June. Started working with neighborhood late last year. Made design changes with their feedback. Meetings were very well attended and had their questions and concerns addressed. Adapted community process to increase input. Still there were people with questions, that’s why we have advisory committee. C. Nunes – Good program, question is whether we would like as a commission to have an official involvement or if we can be engaged individually? Which would you prefer? Ans - HACSA and Sponsors would prefer a designated person from HRC on the committee. An official involvement requires a vote. K. Neubeck – What were major concerns voiced? Ans – Biggest concerns were about fears people have around people with criminal histories. Based on 43 years of experience doing this, our experience is that when you set up a program issues haven’t come up like this because it’s an accountability related process. Sex Offenders was another big issue. As a group there are often misconceptions about Sex Offenders. The rate of recidivism is very low for this population. Program does enhance public safety. A. Thompson – We need a vote to be involved and if approved determine who. E. McGlone – I am interested in serving on that. Think that I could bring double value with LTD perspective with key transportation areas in that site. A. Thompson moved to appoint E. McGlone to the advisory committee. C. Nunes seconded. Approved Unanimously. 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 116, Eugene, OR 97401 541.682.5177 | ehrcenter@ci.eugene.or.us | www.eugene-or.gov/hrc 7. International Human Rights Day Planning A. Thompson – C. Nunes and I met to discuss this. Issue we’re wanting to prioritize is Poverty and Homelessness with a panel discussion. Thinking of inviting the city manager and work with 15th Night, have a person there to speak to youth homelessness, LGBTQ population and low income housing as a means to transition out. Would also like to feature Universal Health Care and its connection to homelessness. Would plan to host on December 10th, maybe at the Hult Center. Looking for a gauge of this idea and then we have more time to plan and move forward. K. Nuebeck – appropriate that we have that discussion since the last was cancelled due to snow. Think it’s a good choice. J. Frenzer - I love the Hult Center but like the idea of having this in the library where people can easily access the event. E. McGlone – Since we’re engaging in policy topics, if we could have a policy workshop to engage community that could be helpful. Give a chance for it to be an interactive event. Take responses to Council etc. A. Toke – Thinking perhaps we could have some meaningful entertainment to draw people in. We could have 2-3 programs to engage day time and evening participants. K. Nuebeck – Would like to see people who are homeless participate in planning this and definitely join for the panel/event. E. Goehring – Want to help people learn more about what this commission does. Like idea of music and performance. Could be an art show, music etc. K. Neubeck – There are many people in camps that are very talented who we could feature. B. Souza – As far as what the HRC does we’re hoping to put together a one pager that says what we do and examples of what that looks like in action. We could use this at the event. A. Toke – CALC has the “We are Neighbors” exhibit which we have used. Possible we could use it again. Bring in people of different backgrounds. C. Nunes – I’m hearing support. Please send any updates. Would accept additional help. E. Goehring will support publicity and event production. A. Toke moved to approve, J. Frenzer seconded. Unanimously approved. 8. City Council Update (Councilor Evans) No need for an update 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 116, Eugene, OR 97401 541.682.5177 | ehrcenter@ci.eugene.or.us | www.eugene-or.gov/hrc 9. Commission Liaison Updates E. Goehring – I emailed you all the salient issues that came up. Mental Health Policy and Crowd Management policy. Mental Health was moved to the Chief, Crowd Management sent back for update. Email me any feedback. Hope to see the Crowd Management policy next month. B. Souza –Attended the CRB meeting. There were no cases that were talked about in depth. One case that will come in was use of Taser on July 16th. Waiting for review of Brian Babb case next week. Stopped recording meetings in the last 6 months. In next meeting the CRB will discuss restarting the recording. If they did start up again would potentially remove the case discussion. Want to know from you all what you think about this. E. Goehring – Linked to personnel laws for the case that was being reviewed. Can see it from the personnel side and as a right to privacy issue since no one has been convicted of anything. Concern from public would likely be who is editing. Lt. Bills – For internal investigations if there is a sustained finding the names have to be redacted. Where this does divert is if there is a case that has very large public interest. I.E. we know who the officer is in the Brian Babb case. When there is a very large public interest the agency is protected in sharing the name. See HRC Meeting Packet with attached update. 10. Work Group Lead Updates B. Souza You have seen the open letter about Mr. Ralston in your packet. Do we want to sign on as the HRC? E Goehring moves to approved C. Nunes seconded. Councilor Evans – I cannot and will not sign the letter. This will not be productive in terms of having the effects we want with attitudes and behaviors in Springfield. I think this emboldens him and his supporters. Saw a man standing in Springfield holding a sign saying “keep Springfield white”. Eugene cannot claim it is the bastion of progressivism. We need to be careful when pointing fingers at other jurisdictions when we don’t have our house in order. Best tactic is not to give him more publicity. Let us be more strategic how we deal with political leaders. B. Souza – Like the content of the letter and agree with points raised by Councilor Evans. A. Toke – Agree with Bonnie, and want to clarify that this was written by a statewide organization. Councilor Evans – there is already a fractured relationship with Springfield. Mayor of Springfield has not been paying very much attention to him. Only 6 people speaking against him and 3 to support. No motion was made and discussion on the letter ended. 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 116, Eugene, OR 97401 541.682.5177 | ehrcenter@ci.eugene.or.us | www.eugene-or.gov/hrc A. Thompson – Chris and I also met to talk about Objective one. Basically just talked about our goals for the work group. Will meet with Mayor and City Manager every quarter. Also plan to meet quarterly with the Sustainability Commission and Neighborhood Leaders Council. Are there other commissions you’d like us to meet with? Feel free to email me with additional thoughts. E. McGLone – Maybe the 4J Equity Committee? B. Souza – Main topics discussed at the last meeting included HB 2002, which will be in effect in January. We plan to invite Dave Fidanque to talk to us about this law. Spoke in depth about outreach to communities of color and LGBTQ communities. Discussed documents needed and who we would reach out to. Looked at draft questions and talked about a general timeline in depth and may encompass the full year. Meeting again next Monday to update the list of people to meet with at that time. With a full list will send it out to everyone to look for any suggestions. See notes attached. E. McGlone – Send any additional people you think should be on the list. J. Frenzer – Objective 3 met on 9-8. A lot of regulars from last year attended the meeting. Left the meeting with a number of questions/continued discussion:  Wondering if the city has adopted a commitment to housing first model? Where are they at in that process?  Intimidation code and designation of people who are unhoused. Are they going to be designated as homeless, socioeconomically challenged, etc.  Discussion about the Equity and Human Right Board not being public and how to make it more effective. Phil is currently the board member. 11. Staff Update M. Kinnison - See packet for written updates. There is a MUPTE advisoy committee that includes a member from a human rights organization. Phil applied to represent the HRC on this panel. Councilor Evans movee to support Phil’s apt, A. Toke seconded. Approved unanimously M. Kinnison - HRC annual budget was increased an additional $500, since the youth commission may need some extra support. Lane County Public Health and other partners are conducting a community health assessment. Asked for either agenda time or finding another time to invite you to a focus group. Looking to do this October or November. We will work with them to find another time when some of you can give input into this process. Jen will work out these details with their staff. M. Kinnison – Each work group needs to keep summaries of the meetings and share them with staff. 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 116, Eugene, OR 97401 541.682.5177 | ehrcenter@ci.eugene.or.us | www.eugene-or.gov/hrc E. Goehring – Timing of Police Commission meetings makes it impossible to get these in on time. J. Lleras Van Der Haeghen – Maybe you can send them to me for copies for the meeting, they can be included in the next month’s packet and minutes so that they are still public documents. 12. Agenda Planning and Open Discussion G. Evans – Please take time to view African American’s Rites of Passage online or on DVD. Powerful video of youth. A. Thompson – Requested commissioners send him agenda items. 13. Closing/Announcements 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 116, Eugene, OR 97401 541.682.5177 | ehrcenter@ci.eugene.or.us | www.eugene-or.gov/hrc

Agenda

City of Eugene Human Rights Commission Packet Contents for September 15th, 2015 1. Agenda 2. Work Planning 2015 Minutes 3. HRC Budget 4. Smoke Free Downtown Documents 5. Materials for City Council a. FY 2015 Work Plan Report b. FY 2016 Work Plan Proposal for City Council 6. Homelessness Work Group Work Plan updated with tracked changes for HRC Review 7. Housing and Community Services Agency of Lane County 8. Open Letter on Xenophobic Racist Political Rhetoric 9. Staff Update 10. Lane County Poverty and Homelessness Board Letters on the Criminalization of Homelessness 11. MUPTE Panel Press Release 12. Tim Wise Flyer 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 116, Eugene, OR 97401 541.682.5177 |ehroffice@ci.eugene.or.us | www.eugene-or.gov/hrc City of Eugene Human Rights Commission The mission of the Human Rights Commission is to promote implementation of universal human rights values and principles in all City of Eugene programs and throughout the wider community. To carry out this mission the commission shall affirm, encourage and initiate programs and services within the City of Eugene and in the wider community designed to place priority upon protecting, respecting, and fulfilling the full range of universal human rights as enumerated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. To support and promote human rights, the commission will: provide human rights education, be proactive in human rights efforts, address human rights violations, ensure active public participation, be transparent and open, and be publicly accountable for human rights progress. Human Rights Commissioners: Andrew Thomson Chair, Chris Nunes Vice Chair, Ken Neubeck, Jennifer Frenzer, Edward Goehring, Philip Carrasco, Edward McGlone, Arun Toke, Debra Merskin, Bonnie Souza, Councilor Greg Evans, Human Rights and Neighborhood Involvement Staff: Michael Kinnison, Jennifer Lleras Van Der Haeghen The Human Rights Commission typically meets on the third Tuesday of each month. Tuesday, September 15th, 2015 5:30 – 7:30 PM Meeting Atrium Building, Sloat Room, 99 W. 10th Avenue, Eugene Contact: Jennifer Lleras Van Der Haeghen, 541-682-5619, jennifer.e.vanderhaeghen@ci.eugene.or.us ITEM _______________ACTION______ TIME 1. Agenda/Minutes Review and Approval (Chair) Discuss/Vote 5:30 - 5:35 (5 min) 2. Public Comment (Chair) 5:35 - 5:40 (5 min) 3. Support Request (Chair) None received 4. Smoke Free Downtown (Ken Neubeck) Discussion 5:40 – 6:05 (25 min) 5. Work Plan and Quarterly Meetings Commission Input Discussion 6:05 – 6:20 (15 min) 6. International Human Rights Day Planning Discussion 6:20 – 6:30 (10 min) 7. Housing and Community Services Agency of Lane County The Oaks at 14th Presentation 6:30 – 6:40 (10 min) 8. City Council Update (Councilor Evans) 6:40 – 6:50 (10 min) 9. Commission Liaison Updates 6:50 – 7:00 (10 min) 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 116, Eugene, OR 97401 541.682.5177 |ehroffice@ci.eugene.or.us | www.eugene-or.gov/hrc 10. Work Group Lead Updates 7:00 – 7:10 (10 min) 11. Staff Update Q and A 7:10 – 7:15 (5 min) 12. Agenda Planning and Open Discussion 7:15 – 7:25 (10 min) 13. Closing/Announcements 7:25 -7:30 (5 min) Upcoming events, activities or meetings the HRC needs to be aware of: Envision Eugene Commissioner Workshop (City of Eugene) – September 17th, 2015 @ 5pm Atrium Building, Sloat Conference Room Gender Identity in the Workplace – A Discussion of Legal and Personal Considerations (Wayne Morese Center for Law and Politics and OUTLaws) – September 21st, 2015 @ 12pm Knight Law center Room 241 Making the Case for Transgender Health and Rights: Gender Recognition in the Courts and Prison (Wayne Morse Center’s Public Affairs Speaker Series, UO OUTLaws and the Pride Foundation) September 21st, 2015@ 5pm Knight Law Center Room 142 White Like Me – Race, Racism and White Privilege in America Film Screening (Linn-Benton Community College, Community Action for Racial Equity and Human Relations Commission for the City of Albany) – October 11th, 2015 4-6pm Albany Public Library White Like Me and Colorblind - Tim Wise Lecture (LBCC, OSU, King Legacy Advisory Board of Corvallis) October 14th, 2015 Albany: LBCC Forum Lecture Hall F-104 @ 2pm and Corvallis: OSU LaSells Stewart Center @ 7pm. The Eugene Human Rights Commission welcomes your interest in these agenda items. This meeting location is wheelchair accessible. For the hearing impaired, FM-assistive listening devices are available or an interpreter can be provided with 48 hours’ notice prior to the meeting. Spanish-language interpretation will also be provided with 48 hours’ notice. To arrange for these services, contact staff at (541) 682-5177. La Comisión de Derechos Humanos agradece su interés por participar en los asuntos de esta agenda. El local de la reunión tiene acceso para personas en silla de ruedas. Para las personas con dificultades auditivas ofrecemos sistemas FM para ayudarlo a escuchar, o intérpretes de lenguaje de señas. También ofrecemos intérpretes de español. Si necesita cualquiera de estos servicios por favor solicítelos con 48 horas de anticipación, llamando al (541) 682-5177. 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 116, Eugene, OR 97401 541.682.5177 | ehrcenter@ci.eugene.or.us | www.eugene-or.gov/hrc City of Eugene Human Rights Commission MINUTES August 4th 2014 Work Planning 5:00 – 8:30 PM Meetings Eugene Police Department, Kilcullen Room, 300 Country Club Road Present: Bonnie Souza, Chris Nunes, Ken Neubeck, Jennifer Frenzer, Edward Goehring, Arun Toke, Debra Merskin, Andrew Thomson, Philip Carrasco, Edward McGlone Not Present: Councilor Greg Evans Staff Present: Jennifer Lleras Van Der Haeghen and Michael Kinnison a) Welcome and Review from 7/14/15 b) Getting to know you activity c) Finalize objectives to move forward d) Objective Planning and Activity Identification e) Work Plan report backs, edits and approval 1. Each group will have 20 minutes a. 5 min Presentation b. 10 min Discussion c. 5 min Approval f) Liaison discussion and appointments a) Welcome and Review from 7/14/15 b) Getting to Know you Activity c) Finalize objectives: The HRC reviewed notes from the first work planning meeting and discussed where there is energy and capacity to advance Human Rights work. The group agreed for continuity that Objective 4 would become 5 as it is to respond to issues as they come up. This reflects the format of the FY 15 work plan. HRC discussed that Objective 3 was the only objective to not have at least 2 leads sign up. Objective 3 is related to homelessness and poverty and has had a lot of work and 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 116, Eugene, OR 97401 541.682.5177 |ehroffice@ci.eugene.or.us | www.eugene-or.gov/hrc energy put into it in the past two years. The HRC had a conversation about the importance of Objective 3, the need to have enough leadership to advance the work and what the potential outcomes might be if the HRC were to drop objective three and add work on homelessness to another objective. The HRC ultimately decided that it is critical that this objective remains in the work plan and Debra Merskin offered to play a supportive role. Chris Nunes made a motion to keep Objective 3 on the work plan, Edward Goehring seconds and it passes unanimously. d) Objective Planning and Activity Identification HRC members address each Objective in small groups to identify actions and tasks that will help accomplish each objective. After 45 minutes each Objective reported back to the full group. e) Work Plan Report Backs All notes from workgroup report backs are below. Following the report backs HRC members discussed the content, made edits to the text in some cases and voted to approve the text as it is below. Votes affirming the work plan objectives and actions/tasks were taken after each report back – noted below. Objective 1: Maintain effective relationships; advise and advocate on human rights issues with City Council, other City advisory bodies, staff, community organizations and institutions. Leads: Andrew Thomson Community partners and Number of Dots: 3 and Chris Nunes resources: Action 1.1: Advise City Council on human rights issues; advocate for human rights perspective. Task 1: Quarterly meetings between HRC chairs and Mayor Action 1.2: Advise, Collaborate and Educate City staff on human rights issues within the City organization Task 1: Quarterly meetings between HRC chairs and City Manager Task 2: Advocate for diverse applicant pool within the HRC, boards and commissions and other City departments Task 3: Request hiring data and demographic statistics from HR Director Task 4: Request diversity training curriculum for review Action 1.3: Support work of other community organizations and institutions that further the mission of the HRC. Task 1: Funding requests and co-sponsorships Task 2: Endorsements (non-funding support, joint statements, tabling etc.) Task 3: Track where funding requests go, which groups do not approach us and advertise for diversity Edward Goehring moves to pass Objective 1 as amended and Debra Merskin seconds the motion. The motion passes unanimously. Objective 2: Proactively address and respond to discrimination, hate and bias activity and violence; including systemic and individual racism. Leads: Edward McGlone, Community partners and Number of Dots: 7 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 116, Eugene, OR 97401 541.682.5177 | ehrcenter@ci.eugene.or.us | www.eugene-or.gov/hrc Ken Neubeck and Bonnie resources: Souza Action 2.1: Ally Building and Collaborations Task 1: Ally building training for the HRC Task 2: Strengthen ally relationships through intentional outreach to organizations/activists of color/LGBTQ organizations and activists. Task 3: Work with government and community organizations on issues of concern to LGBT youth and youth of color Action 2.2: Policy Analysis and Advising Task 1: Study causes and trends in hate/bias activity and recommend actions to address them Task 2: Develop specific roles for HRC response and plan of action to execute when hate crimes or bias incidents occur Task 3: Familiarize HRC with new state law on profiling and keep up to date on EPD implementation Action 2.3: Education, Outreach and Events Task 1: Participate in First Fridays Communities of Color and Allies Network to listen and promote the HRC Task 2: Encourage new alliances among groups working on civil and human rights Task 3: Propose an event that promotes freedom from discrimination as a human right Ken Neubeck moves to pass Objective 2 and Debra Merskin seconds the motion. The motion passes unanimously. Objective 3: Respond to and advocate on community issues of economic inequality, poverty and homelessness. Leads: Jennifer Frenzer Community partners and Number of Dots: 8 resources: Action 3.1: Monitor, advise and advocate ways to respond to poverty and homelessness including collaborating with community organizations Task 1: Task 2: Task 3: Action 3.2: Address civil and human rights of people who are homeless and or living in poverty Task 1: Task 2: Task 3: Action 3.3: Advocate for expansion of shelter programs and emergency shelter Task 1: Task 2: Task 3: 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 116, Eugene, OR 97401 541.682.5177 | ehrcenter@ci.eugene.or.us | www.eugene-or.gov/hrc Ken Neubeck moves to pass Objective 3 as amended and Edward Goehring seconds the motion. The motion passes unanimously. Objective 4: Develop and strengthen the capacity of the HRC by exploring new opportunities, creating a leadership development pipeline and supporting the working groups of the HRC. Leads: Phil Carrasco, Community partners and Number of Dots: 4 Jennifer Frenzer, Andrew resources: and Chris Nunes Action 4.1: Provide support to the HRC and Working Groups to maximize the implementation of the work plan. Task 1: Ensure agenda items for upcoming meetings are sent to the HRC members by Tuesday before each meeting taking place. Task 2: Attend workgroup meetings as needed. Task 3: Check in with work group leads Action 4.2: Identify training and resources for HRC and Working Group members that will increase shared human rights framework and necessary skills. Task 1: Seek out and participate in human rights training opportunities (i.e. Urban Justice Center’s Human Rights Institute) Task 2: Share meeting facilitation techniques, role clarification and project management Action 4.3: Explore the development of a Human Rights Youth Commission in order to build a larger community of Human Rights leaders, increase input and leadership of youth and provide opportunities for mentorship. Task 1 :Meet with stakeholders (youth and mentors) and research best practices for youth commissions Task 2: Have a stakeholders forum where we will identify next steps, process and retention strategies for youth. Task 3: Have community conversations led by youth, build an exploratory committee and establish two liaisons from the HRC. Philip Carrasco moves to pass Objective 4 as amended and Ken Neuback seconds the motion. The motion passes unanimously. Objective 5: Bring forward work requests for emerging issues within the Eugene community and City organization that alight with the HRC Mission and capacity of the commission. Leads: intentionally left Community partners and Number of dots: blank resources: Action 5.1: Action 5.2: Action 5.3: 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 116, Eugene, OR 97401 541.682.5177 | ehrcenter@ci.eugene.or.us | www.eugene-or.gov/hrc f) Liaison Discussion HRC had a discussion about a vacant liaison position on the Civilian Review Board. According to the bylaws the HRC should appoint someone to the position during the summer meeting. After reviewing the work of the CRB liaison the position was opened for interest and nominations. Bonnie Souza expressed interest in the position and a need to clarify capacity before accepting. Edward Goehring moves to appoint Bonnie Souza to the Civilian Review Board pending her decision regarding capacity. Chris Nunes seconds the motion and it passes unanimously. g) Additional item: International Human Rights Day Mike Kinnison reminded the HRC that historically the decision on a topic and a committee to plan the International Human Rights Day event is done at the work planning retreat. The group discussed potential event topics including Low Income Housing and Homelessness but was unable to finalize a decision. Chris Nunes, Andrew Thomson and Edward Goehring formed a committee to work on the project and agree to come to the next HRC meeting with a proposal for IHRD. 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 116, Eugene, OR 97401 541.682.5177 | ehrcenter@ci.eugene.or.us | www.eugene-or.gov/hrc Human Rights Commission Budget Fiscal Year 2016 (FY16) DATE REQUESTING GROUP EVENT OR DESCRIPTION SPONSORSHIP OTHER TOTAL TOTAL BALANCE 7/1/15 CHARGES SPENT TD $4,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,500.00 TOTALS $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,500.00 011-0730-####-612022 HRC HOMELESSNESS WORK GROUP SUMMARY OF 6/9/2015 DISCUSSION OF SMOKING BAN ` The discussion began with the question of whether the proposed smoking ban in the parks and downtown was a human rights issue. One of the eight people present said it was a serious public health issue, but not a human rights issue that should be brought to the HRC. Most thought it was both a public health and a human rights issue. The gist of the minority argument is presented here: “I acknowledge that some people who are homeless may struggle with this proposed rule. However, it’s only a very small percentage of unhoused people that are found downtown. In fact, I have my doubts that many downtown people who people assume are unhoused downtown are actually unhoused. I do not accept the premise that this proposal is targeted to homeless people as I think you imply. I’d want to see evidence before I make that assumption. On the other hand, there is both a public health and a public comfort issue involved. Many people, including me, really don’t like being around second hand smoke and find it distasteful or worse. I avoid smoky places. Some people who have asthma or other breathing issues are physically harmed by smoke. They have human rights to clean air. Few argue that smoke is good for you or that it enhances the environment of the location where smoking is taking place. To me the human rights issue is arguable but not clear. However, the public health and comfort issue is clear.” A number of points were made regarding the proposed smoking ban as a human rights issue. 1. The ban would have a disproportionate or disparate impact on people who are homeless. Those who are housed can ordinarily smoke at their homes or those of others and in their vehicles, as well as in designated outdoor smoking areas of bars and restaurants. People who are homeless do not have houses or apartments in which to smoke, lack vehicles, and cannot afford to patronize bars and restaurants. Lacking any safe and legal place to “be” they often seek safety and companionship by being together downtown and they rest and sleep in the parks—the two areas targetted by the smoking ban. 2. The proposed ban offers additional opportunities for the criminalization of homelessness. If people who are homeless are cited for smoking, this will be one more addition to their police records and one more fine that they are likely to be unable to pay. Failure to respond to citations can lead to additional fines and arrests. This then adds further to their police records, making it even more difficult for those who are unhoused to be accepted by landlords or employers. 3. Some argue that the “development” or “revitalization” of Eugene’s downtown is riding on “gentrification” of that area such that it thrives on primarily serving people who are economically privileged (read housed). In order to get affluent Eugene residents to come downtown, as well as visitors, tourists, and sports fans who come to Eugene for events, gentrification requires that the presence of people who are homeless on the streets and in the parks be sharply reduced if not eliminated altogether. The proposed smoking ban, and the citations that would accompany its violation, is but one tool the City can use to discourage their presence and visibility. 4. One factor that keeps many people who are homeless smokers is addiction. Nicotine is an addictive drug and many of the people who are homeless and who are heavy smokers suffer nicotine addiction, including many dealing with mental illness. Withdrawal while living on the street is extraordinarily difficult, even for those who are not mentally ill. Smoking often helps stave off hunger, temporarily reduces anxieties, and helps keep up the energy people require to keep moving lest they be cited for behaviors like resting or sleeping in public space. 5. Another factor that keeps people smoking and addiction maintained are the social functions played by cigarettes. They can be shared or passed around by people socializig together, are often used as currency or as something to barter by those who are homeless, and responding positively to another’s request for a smoke is part of street culture and is a shared norm of behavior among people who are unhoused. 6. To the degree to which smoking is a public health issue, it is unlikely to be reduced among people who are homeless by punitive measures such as citations and fines. Given the conditions in which they struggle to survive, addictions and mental health issues, and the norms of street culture, addressing their smoking is the least of the many concerns of those who live on the streets. It is likely that they will continue to smoke, be unable to pay for citations, and remain in downtown and the parks simply because there is no place for them to go. Nicotine addiction among people who are homeless, including those who are mentally ill, is best treated the same way other drug addictions and mental illnesses are best treated: through providing permanent housing first and then working on health issues. 7. Human rights that the proposed smoking ban could affect include the human right to equal treatment under the law, to be free from discrimination, to adequate housing, and to health care. Summary of July 22 Meeting Thirteen people attended the July 22 meeting held at the Campbell Senior Center to discuss issues around equitable enforcement of the possible expansion of smoke-free areas in downtown Eugene. Community Members • Andrew Thompson, Chair of City of Eugene Human Rights Commission • Art Boland • Jennifer Frenzer, Member of City of Eugene Human Rights Commission • Josie McCarthy, Food for Lane County Dining Room • Karen Edmonds, Food for Lane County • Majeska Seese-Green • Todd Kieser Staff from Lane County Public Health • Stephen Brown Staff from the City of Eugene • Sarah Medary, Assistant City Manager • Pete Kerns, Chief of Police • Jennifer Van Der Haeghen, Human Rights Program • Laura Hammond, Planning and Development Facilitator • Rae Trotta Themes from Discussion • Concerns about equitable enforcement • Use of profiling – not just of possible homeless but other populations, • Inequitable consequences within the court system • Consider warnings – need to be written and clear • Concern about creating exceptions • Allowing at certain places or times provides opportunity for inequity • Creates confusion • Concerns about impact on downtown employees and residents • Concerns about vulnerable populations – young people and those with mental illness, may be displaced to less safe areas • Concern about impact in areas next to the boundaries • Employees and businesses need to be supported. Cessation support needs to be available and be readily accessible. Businesses should be able buy-in because feels easy and supported. • Desire for transparency and clarity around the policy and enforcement. • Desire to ensure policy is “non-criminal” and is a policy that supports everyone’s health • Concerns about use of police resources and position it puts them in • Need for broad community input • Identification of other needs downtown to create healthy downtown – i.e. bathrooms, places wash hands Summary of July 30 Meeting Ten people attended the July 30 meeting held at the Atrium Saul Room to discuss issues around equitable enforcement of the possible expansion of smoke-free areas in downtown Eugene. Community Members • Chris Nunes, Vice Chair City of Eugene Human Rights Commission • Dan Bryant, Square One Villages • Deb Holloway, Uhlhorn Program, Shelter-Care • Lisa MacAdam, Shelter-Care Staff from Lane County Public Health • Stephen Brown • Christy Inskip Staff from the City of Eugene • Sarah Medary, Assistant City Manager • Pete Kerns, Chief of Police • Jennifer Van Der Haeghen, Human Rights Program • Laura Hammond, Planning and Development Themes from Discussion • Concerns about further displacement of already marginalized individuals o High rate of smoking in certain populations • Reduce access to services • Safety concerns, especially for young people • Concerns about enforcement o Desire for enforcement to be “non-criminal” • Better use of police resources • Possibility of escalation • Position it puts officers in – need to understand mental situation, etc. • Budget strains • Concerns about equity – exemptions o Perception • Desire for community engagement and community voice in process • Need to include homeless in discussion – meet with them where they are at • Evidence of success in other smoke-free spaces • Need for cessation support – it helped in other smoke-free places • Public education campaign needed to help explain the internet Attachment A City of Eugene Human Rights Commission FY 2015 Work Plan Report Summary This is the report from the Human Rights Commission FY 2015 Work Plan. The work plan was approved by City Council in October of 2014. Below are highlights from the past year, followed by detailed charts of progress on implementing the work plan. Highlighted Work Events To help raise awareness, foster respect, create community dialogue, and increase education on human rights issues the Human Rights Commission (HRC) hosted, assisted with organization and participated in several events: • Asian Celebration • NAACP – MLK Jr. Day March • LCC MLK Jr. Community Event • HRC - International Human Rights Day Event • HRC – Human Rights and Crisis of Youth Homelessness event • Forum on Gang Activity in Bethel Area • ACLU forum on police and racial profiling Funding and other support was also provided for community events organized by community groups. The HRC supported 14 community events with endorsement, sponsorship, and/or volunteer work: • Transgender Day of Remembrance • Beyond Toxics • North Eugene High School Students for Social Justice Conference • ASUO Women’s Center Speaker – Mia McKenzie • DisOrient Film Festival • New Generations Film Festival • Martin Luther King Jr. Awards • Vagina Monologues • Blacks in Government (BIG) dinner • NAACP Dinner • Festival Latino Block Party • The Archaeology Channel International Film Fest • Eugene/Springfield PRIDE Festival • Ending Veteran Homelessness Celebration of Success Training and Development Human Rights Commission representative attended the Urban Justice Center’s Human Rights Institute. Key Partnerships The HRC has actively worked to increase communication and collaboration with other City Boards and Commissions, staff, and community groups over the past year to promote human rights and social equity. Boards and Commissions • Police Commission: The HRC has a permanent seat on the Police Commission and so shares one voting member. Additionally the HRC actively participated in the work regarding bias in policing including a public forum. • Civilian Review Board (CRB): The HRC has liaisons assigned to and from the CRB to share information and highlight issues of mutual concern. • Community Development Block Grant: The HRC has one member on the CDBG Committee that focuses on housing and related issues. The HRC liaison participates in the annual competitive process where applicants seek funding for specific projects. • Equity and Human Rights Board (EHRB): The HRC participates on the City’s EHRB that focuses on leadership and organizational commitment to diversity and equity to ensure services are accessible, inclusive and equitably provided in a work environment that supports all employees. • Poverty and Homelessness Board: The HRC monitors the work of the Board and presented information about criminalization of homelessness. • Boards and Commission Recruitment: The HRC actively promoted participation in the board and commissions recruitment process and made recommendations on filling vacancies on the HRC. Department Collaborations • Smoke Free Downtown: Communicated with planning staff about potential impacts and concerns related to a Smoke Free Downtown policy. A special focus was paid to impacts on protected classes and communities experiencing homelessness. • Broadway Plaza: Police personnel provided information on reported incidents at Kesey Square as part of HRC tracking the issue of implementing additional rules governing public use of the area. • MUPTE Revisions: Collaborated with community development staff to provide input on revision to MUPTE specifically addressing immigrant and fair labor concerns. • Environmental Justice Work Group: Provided input on the discussion regarding the Urban Growth Boundary expansion in the Clear Lake Study. • Moving Ahead: HRC participated on the Community Sounding Board for Moving Ahead—a collaborative effort of the City of Eugene and LTD to make our transportation system safe and accessible for people traveling by foot, bicycle, a bus, or in a car along our main streets while supporting great neighborhoods. • Consolidated Plan: HRC received information about the Consolidated Plan update and was invited to provide input via an outreach survey. • Hate and Bias Reporting and Response: The HRC tracked hate and bias incidents reported to the City, began exploring a more active role with hate and bias response and supported other community organizations concerned with local efforts at militia recruitment. Accompanied staff to present annual report to Neighborhood Leaders Council. • Equity and Human Rights Analyst: HRC participated in the hiring process to fill the vacancy in the Human Rights and Neighborhood Involvement Office. • EPD Grant Application: HRC provided a letter of support to a Police grant application for body-worn cameras. Community • Awarded the MLK Jr. Community Leadership Award at the conclusion of the NAACP Martin Luther King Jr. Day march • Integration Network for Immigrants of Lane County (IN): Assisted in discussion to build a survey to capture the immigrant experience in the work place in Lane County. HRC members also aided in the development of a policy for public statements made by IN, contributed to the creation of a service guide for Latinos and participated in strategic planning sessions. Recommendations to Policy Makers Correspondence on the following topics was submitted to local, state and national policy makers during FY 2015. City • Intimidation 2 Code: Advocated to revise the code to include gender identity and homelessness as protected classes. Approached the Police Commission to build support for these changes and secured support on adding gender identity to the code. • City Council: Submitted letter to City Council requesting identification of public spaces to allow emergency sheltering and work session to consider how existing policies and ordinances criminalize or pose barriers to the unhoused. • Recommendations to fill HRC vacancies State • Oregon Homeless Bill of Rights Campaign: Endorsement of Western Regional Advocacy Program’s efforts to introduce legislation at the State level for an Oregon Homeless Bill of Rights. Members Who Served We are deeply grateful to all of the commissioners who served during this work plan and would like to recognize their service. Councilor Greg Evans: 1/2013-present Ken Neubeck: 6/2011-present Andrew Thomson: 6/2011-present Richie Weinman: 6/2011-present Chris Nunes: 6/2012-present Edward Goehring: 7/2013- present Philip Carrasco: 9/2013 - present Mary Clayton: 9/2013 - present Debra Merskin: 1/2014 - present Arun Toke: 7/2014 – present Jennifer Frenzer: 6/2014 - present The Human Rights Commission relies on the generous contribution of time from commissioners and also many engaged community members that collaborate on HRC related work. In total more than 500 hours were logged by commissioners alone over the past year. Human Rights Commission FY 2015 Work Plan Progress Report ☒ Checked Boxes indicate the task was completed Objective 1: Maintain effective relationships; advise and advocate on human rights issues with City Council, other City advisory bodies, staff, community organizations and institutions. Objective Leads: Andrew Thomson, Chris Nunes Support: Edward Goehring, Jennifer Frenzer, Phil Carrasco, Arun Toke Action 1.1 Advise City Council on human rights issues, advocate for a human rights perspective Task 1: ☒ Deliver report of previous year’s work and present new work plan to Council Task 2: ☒ Provide testimony, as needed, to City Council on emerging Human Rights issues (Homelessness) Task 3: ☒ Quarterly meetings between the HRC Chairs and the Mayor Action 1.2 Advise City Staff on human rights issues within the City organization, collaborate and educate on human rights perspective Task 1: ☒ Quarterly meetings between the HRC Chairs and the City Manager Task 2: ☒ Advocate for diverse applicant pool within the HRC, boards and commissions, and other City departments (Asian Celebration Recruiting) Task 3: ☐ Review hiring data and host presentation for Human Resources director on city hiring practices Task 4: ☒ Participate in or seek opportunities to provide a human rights perspective on planning and/or policy development initiatives (Envision Eugene TBL) Action 1.3 Collaborate with, advise, and educate other City Advisory Bodies on human rights issues Task 1: ☒ Bring the Human Rights perspective to deliberation and action of other advisory bodies (Collaboration with Police Commission on Intimidation code revision) Task 2: ☒ Assign and maintain liaisons Task 3: ☐ Invite annual presentation from Police Auditor/CRB Action 1.4 Support the work of other community organizations and institutions that further the mission of the HRC Task 1: ☒ Respond to funding requests and co-sponsorships Task 2: ☒ Respond to requests for endorsements (non-funding support: tabling joint statements, etc.) Task 3: ☒ Continue liaison building with Latino and immigrant organizations: Integration Network and others Task 4: ☒ Attend at least one Neighborhood Leaders Council meeting to provide an update on HRC workplan and discuss opportunities for collaboration. Task 5: ☒ Identify and implement one opportunity for collaboration on a human rights issue with neighborhood associations. (Hate and Bias report, NLC) Task 6: ☒ Raise awareness of HRC within community (ie. MLK March, IHRD) Task 7: ☒ Determine partners and annual theme for International Human Rights Day, delegate planning Objective 2: Respond to and address hate and bias activity, including systemic and individual racism. Leads: Mary Clayton, Debra Merskin Support: Andrew Thomson, Phil Carrasco Action 2.1 Increase HRC and Council awareness of hate and bias activity; coordinate responses in collaboration with community. Task 1: ☒ Receive quarterly reports from EPD and Human Rights & Neighborhood Involvement staff Task 2: ☐ Provide feedback to Council on trends and areas of concern including all institutions and organizations that fall within the City of Eugene (Staff initiated contact with UOPD to explore joint reporting) Task 3: ☐ Develop specific roles for HRC response and plan of action to execute when incidents occur Task 4: ☒ Conduct outreach and establish relationships with vulnerable populations (RAP/Hate and Bias Community partner meeting) Action 2.2 Review local data sources to identify indicators of systemic racism Task 1:☒ Review the Equity and Opportunity Assessment Task 2: ☐ Identify opportunities to provide input utilizing the Equity and Opportunity Assessment when advising Action 2.3 Develop policy for engagement between the HRC and Police Auditor Task 1: ☒ Meet with the auditor to learn more about the auditor process and share the human rights perspective (staff report on meeting, results transmitted to the HRC, suggestions for the future CRB liaison to meet with the auditor periodically) Task 2: ☒ Communicate to interested community members the auditor's function as it relates to human rights Task 3: ☒ Work with Human Rights & Neighborhood Involvement staff to ensure there is a feedback loop between the community and the auditor’s office Task 4: ☒ Continue to provide HRC liaison to the Civilian Review Board Action 2.4 Propose International Human Rights Day theme on Racism and Discrimination Task 1: ☒ Seek full HRC approval for the theme during the August meeting Task 2: ☒ Plan and execute the event in early December 2015 Objective 3: Respond to and advocate on community issues of poverty and homelessness. Leads: Richie Weinman, Jennifer Frenzer, Ken Neubeck Action 3.1 Monitor, advise and advocate on ways to respond to poverty and homelessness Task 1: ☒ Advise Council on pressing issues and support/advocate for City efforts to implement Housing First Model (PHB presentations which include Council representation) Task 2: ☒ Monitor activities of the Lane County Poverty and Homelessness Board and the Human Services Commission (Presentation to PHB on Criminalization) Action 3.2 Address civil and human rights of people who are homeless Task 1: ☒ Request collaboration with EPD to compile data on crimes committed against people who are homeless, including bias crimes, and share data with HRC (Included in Hate and Bias Report) Task 2: ☒ Continue work on protected class designation for homeless under Criminal Code Intimidation 2 and the Human Rights Ordinance Task 3: ☒ Move forward on local homeless bill of rights community education, outreach, and build alliances with CALC and other community groups Task 4: ☒ Identify local laws and policies that criminalize homelessness and/or create barriers to survival and ally-build for change (work with Eric Tars, Police Commission) Action 3.3 Assess progress and obstacles in responding to homelessness and crafting shelter solutions Task 1: ☒ Complete assessment and track Opportunity Eugene task force on homelessness recommendations (Information gathered, report pending) Task 2: ☒ Examine obstacles to increased shelter solutions (information gathered) Task 3: ☒ Assess currently available emergency and transitional housing to identify gaps in meeting human rights needs(Presentation to PHB) Action 3.4 Expanding effectiveness of shelter programs Task 1: ☒ Advocate for expansion of car camping and other effective shelter programs (Work group members met with business owners to solicit interest in hosting and answer questions) Task 2: ☒ Research and identify composition of unhoused population, with focus on unmet needs of unhoused children and youth (Youth homelessness event with external expert) Attachment B City of Eugene Human Rights Commission FY 2016 Work Plan Eugene Human Rights Commission 2016 Roster Office of Human Rights & Neighborhood Involvement | 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 116, Eugene, OR 97401 541.682-5177 | www.eugene-or.gov/hrc | hrni@ci.eugene.or.us Position Name Date Appointed Term Expires Position 1 Bonnie Souza 7/1/15 6/30/18 Position 2 Chris Nunes (Vice Chair) 6/30/12 6/30/17 Position 3 Ken Neubeck 6/27/11 6/30/17 Position 4 Jennifer Frenzer 6/9/14 6/30/17 Position 5 Edward Goehring 7/1/13 6/30/16 Position 6 Arun Toke 7/1/13 6/30/16 Position 7 Debra Merskin 1/13/14 6/30/18 Position 8 Andrew Thompson (Chair) 6/27/11 6/30/18 Position 9 Philip Carrasco 9/9/13 6/30/18 Position 10 Edward McGlone 7/1/15 6/30/18 Position 11 Councilor Greg Evans 1/2013 6/30/16 2016 Affirmed Work Plan Goals Goal 1 Take a leadership role in fostering respect for social equity, civil rights, and human rights in the community by engaging in education, outreach, listening and collaboration. Goal 2 Maintain strategic HRC liaisons and engage in cooperative endeavors with community and with City of Eugene advisory groups that support civil and human rights and social equity. Goal 3 Effectively address selected civil and human rights and social equity issue areas of concern to the community and City FY 2016 Human Rights Commission Work Plan Objective 1: Maintain effective relationships; advise and advocate on human rights issues with City Council, other City advisory bodies, staff, community organizations and institutions. Objective Leads: Andrew Thomson, Chris Nunes Action 1.1 Advise City Council on human rights issues; advocate for human rights perspective. Task 1 Quarterly meetings between HRC chairs and Mayor Action 1.2 Advise, Collaborate and Educate City staff on human rights issues within the City organization Task 1 Quarterly meetings between HRC chairs and City Manager Task 2 Advocate for diverse applicant pool within the HRC, boards and commissions and other City departments Task 3 Request hiring data and demographic statistics from HR Director Task 4 Request diversity training curriculum for review Action 1.3 Support work of other community organizations and institutions that further the mission of the HRC. Task 1 Funding requests and co-sponsorships Task 2 Endorsements (non-funding support, joint statements, tabling etc.) Task 3 Track where funding requests go, which groups do not approach us and advertise for diversity FY 2016 Human Rights Commission Work Plan Objective 2: Proactively address and respond to discrimination, hate and bias activity and violence; including systemic and individual racism. Objective Leads: Edward McGlone, Ken Neubeck and Bonnie Souza Action 2.1 Ally Building and Collaborations Task 1 Ally building training for the HRC Task 2 Strengthen ally relationships through proactive outreach to organizations/activists of color/LGBTQ organizations and activists. Task 3 Work with government and community organizations on issues of concern to LGBT youth and youth of color Action 2.2 Policy Analysis and Advising Task 1 Study causes and trends in hate/bias activity and recommend actions to address them Task 2 Develop specific roles for HRC response and plan of action to execute when hate crimes or bias incidents occur Task 3 Familiarize HRC with new state law on profiling and keep up to date on EPD implementation Action 2.3 Education, Outreach and Events Task 1 Participate in First Fridays Communities of Color and Allies Network to listen and promote the HRC Task 2 Encourage new alliances among groups working on civil and human rights Task 3 Propose an event that promotes freedom from discrimination as a human right FY 2016 Human Rights Commission Work Plan Objective 3: Respond to and advocate on community issues of economic inequality, poverty and homelessness. Objective Leads: Jennifer Frenzer and Debra Merskin Action 1.1 Monitor, advise and advocate ways to respond to poverty and homelessness including collaborating with community organizations Action 1.2 Address civil and human rights of people who are homeless and or living in poverty Action 1.3 Advocate for expansion of shelter programs and emergency shelter Objective 4: Develop and strengthen the capacity of the HRC by exploring new opportunities, creating a leadership development pipeline and supporting the working groups of the HRC. Objective Leads: Phil Carrasco, Jennifer Frenzer, Andrew Thompson and Chris Nunes Action 1.1 Provide support to the HRC and Working Groups to maximize the implementation of the work plan. Task 1 Ensure agenda items for upcoming meetings are sent to the HRC group by Tuesday before each meeting taking place. Task 2 Attend workgroup meetings as needed. Task 3 Check in with working group leads Action 1.2 Identify training and resources for HRC and Working Group members that will increase shared human rights framework and necessary skills. Task 1 Seek out and participate in human rights training opportunities (i.e. Urban Justice Center’s Human Rights Institute Task 2 Share meeting facilitation techniques and project management Action 1.3 Explore the development of a Human Rights Youth Commission in order to build a larger community of Human Rights leaders, increase input and leadership of youth and provide opportunities for mentorship. Task 1 Meet with stakeholders (youth and mentors) and research best practices for youth commissions Task 2 Have a stakeholders forum where we will identify next steps, process and retention strategies for youth. Task 3 Have community conversations lead by youth, build an exploratory committee and establish two liaisons from the HRC. FY 2016 Human Rights Commission Work Plan Objective 5: Bring forward work requests for emerging issues within the Eugene community and City organization that alight with the HRC Mission and capacity of the commission. Objective Leads: Action 1.1 Action 1.2 Action 1.3 Name of Group Description Time Commitment Currently Held By and When Appt. LIAISONS FROM HRC TO OTHER BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR COMMISSIONS Police The Police Commission mission is to Meets monthly 2nd Commission recommend to the City Council, the Thursday, 5:30 – 8:30 Edward Goehring City Manager, the Police p. This has a term of 4 (re-appointed February 2015) Department, and the people, the years or as long as a resources, preferred policing single commissioner Back up: Ken Neubeck alternatives, policies and citizens' term - typically 3 responsibilities needed to achieve a years. safe community. We strive to create a climate of mutual respect and partnership between the community and the Police Department that helps achieve safety, justice and freedom for all people in Eugene. Community Eugene receives federal funds which 2 hour monthly Development are awarded to agencies that support meetings typically Chris Nunes Block a variety of community needs related during 6 months out of (re-appointed February 2015) Grant to housing and other issues. During the year, when they an annual competitive process, are working on funds Back up: Philip Carrasco applicants vie for CDBG funding for distribution and specific projects. projects. Additional meetings and trainings throughout the year as necessary. 1 year term with possibility to serve 3 terms. Civilian Review To increase transparency and public Meets monthly, 2nd Primary: Bonnie Souza Board confidence in the police complaint Tuesday, 3 hours process. We evaluate the work of the Back up: Debra Merskin independent Police Auditor, from a civilian perspective, about whether the complaint was handled fairly and with due diligence. Equity and Help guide the work of the DESP 2 hour meetings every Primary: Phil Carrasco Human Rights other month - daytime Board Back Up: Ken Neubeck LIAISONS FROM OTHER BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR COMMISSIONS TO HRC Council Liaison City Councilor Liaison from HRC to 1 year, appointed by Councilor Evans City Council Mayor Eugene Police Provide public safety services to the Lt. Jennifer Bills Dept. community jennifer.y.bills@ci.eugene.or.us Planning Bill Randall Commission Civilian Review To increase transparency and public Chris Wiig Board confidence in the police audit process. We evaluate the work of the independent Police Auditor, from a civilian perspective, about whether the complaint was handled fairly and with due diligence. Human Rights Commission | FY 2016 CALENDAR 12 Peace and Pie in the AUGUST 2015 FEBRUARY 2016 5 Blacks in Government: Park Annual Black History 8 Eugene/Springfield Pride S M T W Th F S S M T W Th F S Month Banquet 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 16 HRC Meeting 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 - Asian Celebration - NAACP Freedom Fund 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Dinner 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 28 29 30 31 15 HRC Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015 15 HRC Meeting MARCH 2016 21 International day of 31 Cesar Chavez Peace S M T W Th F S S M T W Th F S Comm. Service Day 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 20 HRC Meeting OCTOBER 2015 APRIL 2016 19 HRC Meeting S M T W Th F S S M T W Th F S - DisOrient Film Festival 1 2 3 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 17 HRC Meeting NOVEMBER 2015 MAY 2016 20 Trans Day of 12-15 The Archeology S M T W Th F S S M T W Th F S Remembrance Channel Intl Film 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Festival 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 HRC Meeting 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31 10 International Human DECEMBER 2015 JUNE 2016 21 HRC Meeting Rights Day S M T W Th F S S M T W Th F S 15 HRC Meeting 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 18 M.L. King Day JANUARY 2016 JULY 2016  HRC Work Planning 19 HRC Meeting Retreat S M T W Th F S S M T W Th F S 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 31 FY 2016 Human Rights Commission Work Plan Objective 3: Respond to, advocate and educate on community issues of economic inequality, poverty and homelessness. Objective Leads: Jennifer Frenzer and Debra Merskin Action 3.1 Monitor, advise and advocate ways to respond to poverty and homelessness including collaborating with community organizations Task 1 Advise Council on pressing issues and support/advocate for City efforts to implement a local Housing First Model responsive to area needs for adequate affordable housing options and expanding Emergency Shelter Options. Task 2 Monitor and report on activities of the Lane County Poverty and Homelessness Board and Lane County Human Services Commission and other relevant agencies and governing bodies. Task 3 At work group meetings, host monthly presentations from community organizations and local agencies and, in turn, attend their organizing meetings to improve understanding of the issues facing the homeless and increase collaborating on community responses to homeless issues. Action 3.2 Address civil and human rights of people who are homeless and or living in poverty Task 1 Continue work on a protected class designation for people who are homeless under Criminal Code Intimidation 2 and the Human Rights Ordinance. Task 2 Renew efforts with state and regional housing campaigns to enact a local homeless bill of rights, expand community education and outreach, and build alliances with community groups.(Ken Neubeck) (the phrase "CALC and other" was deleted) Task 3 Engage and consult public officials and educate community members about the local laws and policies that criminalize homelessness and/or create barriers to survival. Ally-build for a change to criminalization. Task 4 Coordinate with our Police Commission liaisons and members of other HRC work groups doing outreach to our local police force in order to improve interactions between people who are homeless and police officers. Action 3.3 Advocate for expansion of shelter and affordable housing options (deleted the word “emergency” before the word shelter) Task 1 Advocate for expansion of car camping, rest stops, micro housing villages and other innovative and effective shelter programs and assess gaps in emergency shelter options. Task 2 Complete assessment and track the Mayor’s Opportunity Eugene Task Force on Homelessness recommendations. Task 3 Continue efforts to bring public attention to youth homelessness and initiate outreach work about seniors, women and disabled people who are homeless as well as other vulnerable groups of homeless populations. ** For HRC review – Changes have been italicized** The Oaks at 14th HACSA and Sponsors have a 20+ year history of designing and developing quality projects that enhance our community, create safe neighborhoods and are aesthetically attractive and environmentally friendly. Unlike many private developments, Sponsors and HACSA projects remain accountable to neighbors and elected officials through the life of the development. Project Overview Ensuring that ex-offenders are successful upon re-entry after incarceration serves a fundamental public safety interest in our community. Helping people released from prisons or jails to find safe places to live is critical to reducing homelessness, recidivism and crime. Without this project Lane County’s recidivism rate will be higher forcing Oregon taxpayers to pay for more costly interventions including law enforcement, the judicial system and the corrections system. • The Oaks at 14th will be a 54 unit apartment community of long-term, affordable, permanent housing, not transitional housing, for people with criminal histories, including: veterans, seniors, and people with disabilities. • Residents of this project will be stable, employed or on disability. All residents must be able to self-sustain their rent payments. This housing is not for people straight out of jail or prison. • Re-entry supportive services will be provided by Sponsors, Inc., and its community partners who have employed best practices since 1973 to help the previously incarcerated become taxpaying, law abiding individuals who contribute to a safer community. Next Steps As the project will be receiving funding this year, HACSA and Sponsors Inc. are working to form a Citizen Advisory Committee to guide the project and help work through neighborhood concerns. This committee will include elected officials, government officials and neighbors. This group will meet monthly to hear and discuss concerns and ideas, as well as provide recommendations to the development team on how to proceed. An Architectural firm and Construction Company will be chosen in July 2015 in order to work towards being able to start construction in March or April of 2016. It is anticipated that construction will be complete in the spring of 2017. Project Changes Made based on Neighborhood Input Neighbors voiced a number of concerns related to traffic, infrastructure, bulk, height, privacy and the type of tenants that would be served on the site. • Building Design – Concerns were raised regarding building height, bulk and privacy the project was re-designed to incorporate the following elements: o Reduced Height – The buildings were redesigned to be two-story along all sides adjacent to neighboring homes. This resulted in a reduction of six-units in the project. o Landscape and Fence Buffer – Landscaping and an 8-foot fence will be provided along all areas adjacent to neighboring homes. o Windows on the second floors facing neighboring properties were reduced in size and in some cases obscured. • Traffic and Infrastructure – Concerns were raised regarding the amount of traffic on Acorn Park Road and the lack of sidewalks and safe pedestrian crossing locations on that road. The population the Oaks will serve drives much less than the general population. The design team is also looking at providing a driveway on Oak Patch that was previously emergency entrance only and will continue to work the neighborhood to identify pedestrian improvements that can be helped by the project. • Populations served – Concerns were raised that crime would increase in the neighborhood due to the criminal histories of residents of The Oaks at 14th. o On-site Sponsors staff will case manage clients (24/7) and provide resident services. Additionally, Lane County parole officers will be permanently stationed at the facility and will be available to respond to any signs of drug use or problem behavior. o Residents must pass regular drug and alcohol tests, must be in compliance with treatment and parole requirements, and must pay rent (working, in school, or on disability). o Sponsors and HACSA work very closely with the neighbors and neighborhood associations and have a strong track record of developing projects that improve our community and actually make us safer. Sponsors currently has 12 buildings on 5 sites with 145 beds of transitional and long- term housing. Find out more at: http://www.sponsorsinc.org/programs/oaks-development-project/ For more information, please contact: Paul Solomon, Executive Director, Sponsors, Inc. Ph: 541.505.5652, Email: pjsolomon@sponsorsinc.org, www.sponsorsinc.org Steve Ochs, Real Estate Development Director, Housing And Community Services Agency of Lane County (HACSA), Ph: 541.682.2530, Email: sochs@hacsa.us, www.hacsa.org Citizen Advisory Committee - The Oaks at 14th HACSA and Sponsors Inc. are working to form a Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) in order to guide their project “The Oaks at 14th”. The CAC will help work through neighborhood concerns. This Committee will include a mix of diverse stakeholders: elected officials, government officials, neighborhood association representatives, direct neighbors of the project, faith community representatives as well as African-American and Latino neighbors organizations. This group will meet on a monthly basis to hear and discuss concerns and ideas, as well as provide recommendations to the development team on how to proceed with the project. The plan is to form the CAC by fall 2015 and have it continue its work throughout the development and construction process of the project as well as if necessary extend its work after the completion of the project to ensure thorough cooperation. AIMS  Create a forum for discussion of concerns related to the project  Bring ideas of mutually beneficial cooperation for the community, positive spill-over effects for the community  Find solutions for education and information sharing for the community of the project  Promote mutual respect towards the project as well as community needs THE PROJECT HACSA is partnering up with Sponsors (organization providing re-entry services) to create a long term low income, affordable housing for people with criminal histories, including veterans, seniors, and people with disabilities. This will translate into a 54 unit apartment community with stable, self-sustained, employed or on disability residents. Sponsors has been providing re–entry supportive services since 1973. Project Timeline Strategic Planning Construction CAC formation, meetings and activities 2014 2017 Predevelopment Development Completion For more information, please contact: Paul Solomon, Executive Director, Sponsors, Inc. Ph: 541.505.5652, Email: pjsolomon@sponsorsinc.org, www.sponsorsinc.org Steve Ochs, Real Estate Development Director, Housing And Community Services Agency of Lane County (HACSA), Ph: 541.682.2530, Email: sochs@hacsa.us, www.hacsa.org Outreach Roster The CAC would be composed of 10-15 members. The committee would meet on a monthly basis (in the evenings) from October 2015 until construction will begin (April 2015), and then the committee would take a hiatus and pick up the meetings again around the time when residents’ services and occupancy preparations will begin. Elected / Chris Pryor (or Claire Syrett) Elected / Faye Stewart (or Pat Farr) Parole & Probation / Dean Alft *confirmed , Linda Hamilton EPD: Lt. David Natt *confirmed Neighborhood Services / Human Rights Commissioner Parks & Rec - special presentations Public Works - special presentations Neighborhood : Edward Schiessl *confirmed Neighborhood :Tree Adam Meyers Neighborhood: Eva Edelman *confirmed Sponsors Board Member Richard Greene *confirmed Housing Policy Board : Morgan or Norton At Large - Rick Duncan *confirmed At Large - Mike White *confirmed At Large - Joann Ernst * confirmed At Large Dan Bryant (First Christian Church) Project Team Beergsund DeLaney and Essex Construction Nearby property management Oak meadow apartments Devonshire hills llc St. Vincent de Paul - Oakwood Manor Richardson Bridge Neighborhood Associations Churchill Area Neighbors Tommy Bates *confirmed Far West Neighborhood Association Acorn Park Neighbors West Eugene Community Organization Other potential organizations African American religious leaders Living Hope Church Leaders Association African American neighbors Latino neighbors Eugene Friends Church Valley Covenant Eugene Mennonite Bethel Temple Human Rights Commission LULAC - League of United Latin American Citizens University of Oregon Public Safety Coordinating Council Poverty and Homelessness Board Chair as Facilitator of first meeting Community Leaders Speakout Against Hateful Political Comments As we enter the 2016 Presidential Election, and an ultra competitive Oregon landscape with ballot measures and statewide races, we feel compelled to call out increasingly divisive comments and actions. In the news recently, a City Councilor in Springfield OR publicly opposed a Salvation Army minister because his Pacific Islander race would bring a “minority element”, measures targeting immigrant Oregon families, and Presidential candidates are engaging in hateful rhetoric that demean our communities to win political points. For the sake of our democracy, our diverse communities, and our future, we can do better. The stereotypes of Asian and Latino communities as “anchor babies”, “birth tourists” and “criminals”, simply inflame racist and xenophobic attitudes of some voters who fear changing demographics, rising electoral power of communities of color, and distract from the real policy issues like living wage jobs, reproductive justice, and comprehensive immigration reform. Voters deserve the facts - (1) Communities of color are strengthening America’s economy, boosting the average wages and stimulating investment., (2) Overall crime is on decline thanks to a shift towards prevention and restorative justice, and away from over-incarceration. (3) The vast majority of immigration is about keeping families together, protecting, providing and reuniting with loved ones. The recent comments made by politicians in the media are stigmatizing, portraying Asian Pacific Islanders and Latinos as the perpetual foreigner, dismissing our strong roots, and ignoring the generations of contributions immigrants, refugees and people of color have made, and treating us as expendable. These expressed views can have damaging consequences that have historically led to the incarceration and removal of families, employment discrimination, bullying in schools, and hate crimes. We are also mindful of how the struggles of Asians and Latinos are linked with Black communities, and how rhetoric around immigrants has been used to distance our communities from anti-Black sentiments, Black communities whose historical role in creating the wealth of this nation has never been fully recognized. We stand for the rights, resources and recognition for all communities to thrive, and against the over- criminalization, over-policing, economic disinvestment and political neglect that has disproportionately impacted Black communities. We demand better from our leaders. We expect legitimate candidates and elected officials to engage in meaningful policy dialogue with constituents, not pit communities against one another with racially coded messages. We all have a responsibility to counter the anti-immigrant rhetoric with efforts to understand the root causes of economic inequality. We need solutions instead of scapegoats. We call on all candidates and political leadership to publicly pledge to reject dehumanizing and deceiving political rhetoric, and to instead promote collaboration with diverse communities. Oregon and our country can and will do better. Human Rights Commission - Staff Updates September 2015 MUPTE Technical Panel The City Manager is accepting applications for technical members of the review panel for the Multi-Unit Property Tax Exemption (MUPTE) program. This is a newly formed panel that will provide a third-party review of the MUPTE program for the City Manager. The Panel will meet as needed to: • review new MUPTE applications; • review previously approved projects’ compliance with approval resolutions; • prepare annual reports on the progress of the approved projects, the program’s volume cap, and reporting documentation; and • annually review overall program efficacy. The panel will be comprised of neighborhood representatives (selected by neighborhood association boards and the neighborhood of the proposed MUPTE project) and six technical members. Technical member positions include: • an architect/green building specialist, • a building trades union, • a developer, • an environmental professional, • a public health professional, and • a human rights representative. 1 Panel members will be expected to: A. Have or develop a basic understanding of the projects, terms, and requirements of the MUPTE program. B. Meet as needed to review individual applications and to review approved projects’ compliance with approval resolutions (10 member panel). C. Prepare annual reports on progress of the approved projects, program volume cap, and reporting documentation (10 member panel). D. Meet annually to review overall program efficacy and include summary in annual report referenced in item C above (8 member panel – [all but the neighborhood-specific members]). Member terms will be for either three or four year periods, with opportunities for renewal. The deadline to apply for the committee is September 21, 2015. To apply please submit a letter of interest and provide evidence of technical expertise. Letters of interest or questions should be directed to Amanda Nobel Flannery at amanda.nobelflannery@ci.eugene.or.us or 99 West 10th Avenue, Eugene, OR 97401. 1 Applicants for the human rights representative seat must be a member of a human rights organization or have a written recommendation from a human rights organization Lane County Community Health Assessment The 2015 Community Health Assessment (www.preventionlane.org/cha) is a project between United Way, Lane County Public Health, PeaceHealth, and Trillium conducted every three years to inform the next Community Health Improvement Plan. A key aspect of the project is both in collecting existing data and engaging the community to discover our greatest strengths, most important health issues, and how to make improvements. Over the next few months a number of focus groups and surveys will be implemented to involve the community in the process. The HRC is being requested to provide agenda time (about 45 minutes) in October or November to conduct a focus group, or to meet separately to provide input. Race: the Power of an Illusion EWEB is hosting a screening and discussion of the film Race: The Power of an Illusion, a documentary about race in society, science and history from 11:30 am – 1:30 pm, Monday, September 21 at EWEB Roosevelt Operations Center located at 4200 Roosevelt Blvd. Lunch is provided. Up to three HRC members are invited to attend. Please RSVP to staff no later than Wednesday, Sept. 16. First Friday Communities of Color Network The HRC is encouraged to attend the monthly First Friday Communities of Color Network (FFCCN) events that are hosted by Eugene-Springfield public agencies. The FFCCN provides a safe, welcoming space for communities of color to gather, socialize, network and welcome new members to our community. It is a good opportunity for HRC to get to know members of communities of color and educate folks about the Commissions work. You can subscribe to the following email list to receive information about the monthly events here: http://listserv.lesd.k12.or.us/mailman-lesd/listinfo/firstfriday. Tim Wise Tim Wise will be appearing in Albany and Corvallis on October 14. Mr. Wise is among the most prominent anti-racist writers and educators in the United States. Named one of “25 Visionaries Who are Changing Your World,” by Utne Reader, Wise has spoken in all 50 states, on over 800 college and high school campuses, and to community groups across the nation. Wise is well published, has trained teachers, medical professionals, corporate, government, entertainment, military and law enforcement officials on methods for dismantling racism in their institutions, co-wrote and co-produced the film, “White Like Me: Race, Racism and White Privilege in America,” is regularly featured on CNN and has appeared on 20/20 and in a documentary alongside Angela Davis. Mr. Wise’s website is here: http://www.timwise.org/about/ and here is a link to a CNN interview titled, The 5 Things White People Should Do To Improve Race Relations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNm4d5prXBY. Staff are working to find partners to bring him to Eugene while he is in the area. If that is not successful, staff are coordinating a trip to see Mr. Wise speak in Corvallis at 7 pm, Wednesday, October 14. If you are interested in participating please let staff know. City Council Council returned from their break on September 14th. The following are potential items of interest identified on the tentative working agenda: • 12:00 pm, September 23 Work Session: HRC Annual Report and Work Plan • 5:30 pm, October 12 Work Session: Workforce Housing Lane County Sheriff's Office Byron M. Trapp, Sheriff August 10, 2015 Mr. Jay Bozievich Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners Lane County Board of County Commissioners 125 E 8th Avenue Eugene, OR 97401 Dear Commissioner Bozievich : This letter is in response to a request from the Lane County Poverty and Homelessness Board for a review of local ordinances and policies that may criminalize our fellow citizens who are unhoused or unsheltered. Following review of the Lane Code, I find there are no county ordinances or policies that prohibit any person from engaging in " life sustaining activities." More specifically, there are no Lane Code prohibitions against activities such as; eating, sleeping, resting or urination and defecation. There is no requirement for a business sidewalk use permit. Lane County does have a camping ordinance but it is limited to regulating camping activity within county parks. The Sheriffs Office does coordinate with area businesses through the use of business trespass letters and will continue to do so. I believe we have a duty to assist private property owners, including business owners, with complaints of private property trespass and damage. The Sheriffs Office does not have a policy or practice of targeting homeless persons for enforcement. Our enforcement contacts with homeless persons are consistent with that of the general population; they are in response to complaints of criminal behavior. Furthermore, because the Sheriffs Office is chronically under-resourced, enforcement generally only occurs when no other resolution is available. I am very supportive of efforts to address and resolve poverty and homelessness in our community and I recognize the significant benefits to the criminal justice system in doing so . As a member of the Lane County Poverty and Homelessness Board, I know Lane County is committed to this issue as well. I am confident Lane County's ord inances and policies do not criminalize our homeless population . Byron Trapp, Sheriff 125 E. 8th Avenue • Eugene, OR 97401 • Phone: (541) 682-4150 • Fax: (541) 682-3309 • www.lanesheriff.org MEMORANDUM CITY OF SPRINGFIELD COMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE DATE: 061115 TO: City Manager – Gino Grimaldi FROM: Chief T. Doney SUBJECT: Memo - criminalization of homelessness This memorandum is in response to recent correspondence with the Lane County Poverty and Homelessness Board regarding criminalization of homelessness. In looking at last year’s statistics (2014), there were 6 separate incidents that resulted in a total of 11 individuals being cited/arrested for prohibited camping. One case resulting in enforcement actions against 5 individuals involved in an extensive camp with repeated problems. There was drug activity and additional issues that necessitated the services of DHS – Child Welfare. Two cases involved prohibited camping on property belonging to private businesses. One case involved illegal camping of at least 10 days and another incident involving illegal camping of at least 16 days. In reviewing documents provided to the city, there was concern regarding laws that prohibited the following activities: camping in public, sleeping in public, begging in public, loitering/loafing/vagrancy, sitting/lying in public, sleeping in vehicles and food sharing. The City of Springfield has municipal code that prohibits camping in public but none of the other listed laws of concern. It should be noted that many municipalities in the state/region and nation have similar laws. Private businesses have the ability to trespass individuals from their property and request police assistance. Springfield Police Officers have much more contact with the homeless population than is reflected in the numbers listed above. Often times this population suffers from substance abuse and mental health issues that inevitably result in police contact for behavioral issues/crimes and welfare checks. Sometimes these contacts result in referrals to appropriate social service providers, transports to sobering services or mental health evaluations and sometimes municipal or county jail for crimes. It has been my experience that most often, officers attempt to take the path of least resistance when dealing with this population and arrest/incarceration is the last resort. We also have entered a partnership with CAHOOTS which also assists with dealing with this population. cc: Deputy Chief Lewis Lt. Rappe’ Planning & Development Department News Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date September 2, 2015 Contact: Amanda Nobel Flannery, City of Eugene Economic Prosperity Programs Manager 541-682-5535 Seeking Applications for Technical Members of the MUPTE Review Panel The City Manager is accepting applications for technical members of the review panel for the Multi-Unit Property Tax Exemption (MUPTE) program. This is a newly formed panel that will provide a third-party review of the MUPTE program for the City Manager. The Panel will meet as needed to:  review new MUPTE applications;  review previously approved projects’ compliance with approval resolutions;  prepare annual reports on the progress of the approved projects, the program’s volume cap, and reporting documentation; and  annually review overall program efficacy. The panel will be comprised of neighborhood representatives (selected by neighborhood association boards and the neighborhood of the proposed MUPTE project) and six technical members. Technical member positions include:  an architect/green building specialist,  a building trades union,  a developer,  an environmental professional,  a public health professional, and  a human rights representative. 1 Member terms will be for either three or four year periods, with opportunities for renewal. The deadline to apply for the committee is September 21, 2015. 1 Applicants for the building trades union seat must be a union member or have a written recommendation from a building trades union. Applicants for the human rights representative seat must be a member of a human rights organization or have a written recommendation from a human rights organization. - MORE - To apply please submit a letter of interest and provide evidence of technical expertise. Letters of interest or questions should be directed to Amanda Nobel Flannery at amanda.nobelflannery@ci.eugene.or.us or 99 West 10th Avenue, Eugene, OR 97401. The MUPTE Review Panel was established by the City Council (Ordinance 20556, Section 2.945(13)). The MUPTE program was revised and reinstated by the City Council in July 2015. The MUPTE program is enabled by state legislation and designed to encourage higher density housing and redevelopment in the core of the city. The program provides a tax exemption for up to 10-years on qualified, new multi-unit housing investments that occur within a targeted area, meet program requirements, and are reviewed and approved by council. ### 541-737-3665 “The irony of American history FREE & is the tendency of good white OPEN TO THE Americans to presume racial PUBLIC innocence. Ignorance of how we are shaped racially is the first sign of privilege. In other words. It is a privilege to ignore the consequences of race in America.” -Tim Wise Sponsored by: King Legacy Advisory Board of Supported In-kind by: Community Action for Racial Equity (CARE), Showing Up for Racial Justice (SURJ), Albany Human Relations Commission

Get email alerts for Eugene

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting