Regular Session
Regular MeetingFairfield, UT · November 5, 2025
Minutes
Approved Meeting Minutes
Fairfield Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
November 5, 2025
Minutes
Date: Wednesday, November 5, 2025
Location: Fairfield Town Office 121 West Main Street Fairfield, Utah
Time: 7:00 P.M.
Minutes By: Recorder: Stephanie Shelley
Call to Order
1) Roll Call
Chairman Taylor opened the meeting at 7:00 pm
David Riet, Wayne Taylor, Kyler Fisher, Jami Mascaro, Kelton Butterfield
Staff Present:
Recorder: Stephanie Shelley, Mayor: Hollie McKinney, Attorney: Brad Christopherson,
Others Present: Tal Adair, Michael Weber
Via Zoom: Jane
Chairman Taylor introduced Brad Christopherson (attorney) as the Town’s new legal counsel.
Consent Items
The Commission may approve these items without discussion or public comment and may remove an
item to the Business Items for discussion and consideration.
1) Minutes: August 6, 2025; August 14, 2025; September 3, 2025; September 9, 2025;
The Commissioners discussed wording in the August 14, 2025, minutes regarding private
wells/well-sharing and agreed the Recorder would adjust the language to reflect the discussion
more accurately.
Commissioner Mascaro motion to pass the consent minutes for August 6, 2025; August 14,
2025; September 3, 2025; and September 9, 2025. Commissioner Riet seconded the motion.
Unanimously approved
Commissioner Taylor - Yes
Commissioner Riet - Yes
Commissioner Fisher - Yes
Commissioner Mascaro - Yes
Commissioner Butterfield - Yes
Business Items
The Commissioners will discuss (without public comment) and may either make a recommendation to
the Town Council or approve the following items as needed:
1) Fairfield Industrial Park, an additional 50-foot flagpole location.
1 of 4
Approved Meeting Minutes
Fairfield Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
November 5, 2025
Chairman Taylor explained that the Fairfield Industrial Park had previously been approved on
April 8, 2025, for a 50-foot flagpole with two new possible locations: one by the main gate/
entrance to development, and one by the entrance to the truss plant lot. The current request was
to add two additional potential locations, increasing the total to four. A map was presented to
show all proposed sites, with the two previously approved locations highlighted in orange and
the two new locations highlighted in blue, identified near the main gate entrance and by the
entrance to the truss plant lot.
Chairman Taylor stressed the need to formally approve all four locations as shown on the map to
prevent future confusion. Commissioner Riet then drafted a clear motion to approve the updated
map locations within the Fairfield Light Industrial West zone, noting that placement must remain
compliant with federal, state, and local laws.
Commissioner Riet motioned that we pass agenda item 1, Fairfield Industrial Park, light industrial
west zone, 50-foot flagpole addition locations, there are four locations on the map, and the
commission would sign the map designating that we approved it. Commissioner Mascaro
seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
Commissioner Taylor - Yes
Commissioner Riet - Yes
Commissioner Fisher - Yes
Commissioner Mascaro - Yes
Commissioner Butterfield - Yes
2) Report from the Mayor
Mayor McKinney gave updates on several ongoing town projects. She reported that Comcast
will begin boring on Monday and that the town has completed the required blue stake process.
She also noted that the town’s new attorney, Brad Christopherson, has begun work on the
airport ordinance, not yet fully reviewed by counsel; He’s working on it to get there, but there's a
lot of issues that you have to get through to get there.
The Mayor announced that the updated code book is nearly finished. A complete draft
incorporating all ordinances passed over the last two years has been prepared and will soon be
sent for codification. Once complete, this will place all town ordinances in one consolidated
location, making it easier for residents and officials to track and understand what has been
adopted. Currently, the older code book and more recent ordinances are stored separately on
the town website, creating confusion.
Regarding the park project, Mayor McKinney explained that some of the original dirt had to be
removed because it contained arsenic and could not be reused. That dirt was taken to the
landfill, and clean fill dirt was brought in. Capping work is now underway. Strong’s company is
completing the project, and their bid came in at roughly half the cost of other proposals.
2 of 4
Approved Meeting Minutes
Fairfield Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
November 5, 2025
Mayor McKinney also announced that Comcast expects the Fairfield area to be completed by
December 2, 2025. Comcast said it will run fiber to every home in town, and Comcast may work
on Sundays if needed to stay on schedule, depending on weather conditions. She concluded by
noting that additional work is still needed on the commercial zone, land use ordinances, and
road ordinances.
3) Commercial overlay/ zone
The Commissioners reviewed the Commercial Overlay Zone currently in place. They restated that
the overlay runs along SR-73/Highway 73 on both sides through the town and extends
approximately 300 feet back from the highway from the north end to the south end of Fairfield.
They noted that the overlay area includes existing residential properties and touches areas that
may be industrial or transitioning in use.
They discussed concerns with the ordinance language, indicating that parcels labeled
commercial can no longer be used for residential purposes, especially since many affected
properties are long-standing 5–10 acre residential lots along the highway. Attorney Brad
Christopherson explained that overlays are typically intended to add allowable uses rather than
remove underlying residential rights unless the Town specifically chooses that outcome. He
advised that residential use should remain permitted within the overlay unless the
Commissioners intend otherwise. The Chairman and Commissioners emphasized the
importance of protecting existing residential uses and avoiding unintended loss of residential
rights.
Commissioners and counsel addressed compatibility between commercial and residential uses.
Brad Christopherson recommended a transition approach where commercial areas adjacent to
homes are limited to lighter impacts, using concepts such as “neighborhood commercial” or
other buffering standards to prevent high-intensity commercial uses from being placed directly
next to existing residences.
A significant portion of the discussion focused on conditional uses. Brad stated that in Utah,
once a use is listed as conditional, it becomes difficult to deny if the applicant meets the
ordinance standards; the Town may impose reasonable conditions, but cannot refuse simply
because the use is undesirable. He cautioned that broad conditional-use lists increase legal
exposure and recommended dramatically shortening the use lists and potentially eliminating
most conditional uses in favor of clearer permitted/accessory/special-use standards.
Commissioners agreed that prior practice relied too heavily on conditional uses and that a more
structured chart-based approach would be preferable.
The Commissioners also flagged several ordinance issues for further work. They noted missing
standards for spacing between multiple buildings on the same lot, and questioned whether
current setbacks alone would prevent buildings from being placed too close together. They
reviewed height standards and expressed concern that the ordinance references two stories
while allowing buildings up to 45 feet. Brad Christopherson stated that 45 feet is not two stories
3 of 4
Approved Meeting Minutes
Fairfield Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
November 5, 2025
but closer to four stories, creating a loophole that could allow much taller buildings than
residents expect. Commissioners agreed that the building needs to be addressed and
discussed, reducing the height limit closer to 35 feet, with allowance for screened mechanical
units above the roofline.
Additional wording in the ordinance was highlighted, including access standards. The Chairman
questioned language suggesting vehicle and pedestrian access should be “exclusively and
entirely across the subject lot,” noting it could be interpreted as requiring full-frontage access or
sidewalk development. Brad recommended simplifying the requirement to a frontage/access
standard and reminded the Commissioners that UDOT controls SR-73 access approvals, so
Town standards should align accordingly. The Commissioners also discussed whether nuisance
standards (noise, odor, glare, etc.) should be more clearly defined in a separate nuisance section
and referenced within the overlay.
Regarding use lists and existing businesses, Brad explained that if certain uses are removed
from the overlay, any existing operations under those uses would become legal nonconforming
uses and could continue unless abandoned, meaning removing uses would not automatically
shut existing businesses down. Commissioners agreed not to use the Light Industrial West list as
the basis for commercial overlay uses and directed that the overlay be rebuilt from scratch with a
short permitted list, requiring other uses to come before the Town for approval.
Commissioners agreed to continue studying options before final decisions. This included
considering multiple commercial zones of different intensities, aligning the overlay with the
General Plan, reviewing the Tech Overlay Zone, and examining examples such as Eagle
Mountain’s commercial zoning and maps. The Commissioners also discussed possibly engaging
planning consultants or a planning firm to assist with the overlay framework and use list
development.
During this item, a member of the public (Jane, via Zoom) briefly shared historical context on
commercial zoning in Fairfield. Chairman Taylor allowed the brief comment but reminded
attendees that public comment is not permitted during business items and requested future
comments be submitted by email due to the contentious nature of the topic.
Adjournment
Motion made by Commissioner Masacaro to end the meeting. Commissioner Butterfield seconded the
motion. The meeting ended at 8:38 pm.
January 7, 2026 Stephanie Shelley
Minutes Approval Date Stephanie Shelley Recorder/Clerk
4 of 4
Agenda
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE
Planning Commission of Fairfield, Utah, shall hold a Regular Session on
November 5, 2025, @ 7:00 P.M., At the Fairfield Town Office, 121 West Main Street, Fairfield, Utah.
Agenda
Call to Order
1) Roll Call
Consent Items
The Commission may approve these items without discussion or public comment and may remove
an item to the Business Items for discussion and consideration.
1) Minutes: August 6, 205; August 14, 2025; September 3, 2025; September 9, 2025;
Business Items
The Commission will discuss (without public comment) and may either make a recommendation to
the Town Council or approve the following items as needed:
1) Fairfield Industrial Park, an additional 50-foot flagpole location.
2) Report from the Mayor
3) Commercial overlay/ zone
Adjournment
Join Zoom Meeting: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84690571210?pwd=DiZROJorp1mDLS20hIV0KT4JqbogqU.1
Meeting ID: 846 9057 1210
Passcode: 806234
Certificate Of Posting
The above agenda notice was posted on or before the 4th day of October 2025 at the location of the meeting, Fairfield town office,
121 West Main Street, Fairfield, UT, and at the Fairfield town website https://fairfieldtown-ut.gov/meetings/, and on the Utah State
public notice website at https://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html.
In Compliance With The Americans With Disabilities Act, Individuals Needing Special Accommodations (Including Auxiliary
Communicative Aids And Services) During This Meeting Should Notify City Offices At 801-766-3509.
Date Stephanie Shelley Town Recorder/Clerk
Get email alerts for Fairfield
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.