Community Engagement Commission
Regular MeetingFalcon Heights, MN · May 20, 2024
Minutes
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
Community Engagement Commission
City Hall
2077 West Larpenteur Avenue
MINUTES
May, 20 2024 at 6:30 P.M.
A. CALL TO ORDER: 6:31 PM
B. WELCOME:
C. ROLL CALL:
Karen Cooley-Kistler_X_ Julie Ebbesen_X_ Zach Lindstrom_X_ Curt Stockford_X_
Mishy Wang_X_ Rebecca Leighton_X_ Denise King_X_
STAFF PRESENT:
Elke Van der Werff_X_
COUNCIL LIAISON:
Melanie Leehy____
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
1. Stockford –
a. Old business - add Spring Together review, Community Liaison Handbook,
review topics from last meeting regarding apartment outreach and CERT
training
b. New business – Add information regarding International Institute need for
resettlement items
2. Cooley Kistler & Knight verify Ice Cream social discussion will be shared meeting
with the Park Commission.
Amended agenda - motion to approve Cooley-Kistler, 2nd Lindstrom
E. PRESENTATION:
1. GET TO KNOW EACH OTHER
a. Van der Werff – accepted to grad school at Hamline for Public Administration
b. Ebbesen – looking forward for May to be over
c. Leighton – soccer tournament last week
d. Lindstrom – graduating!
e. Knight – back from London, job searching & working on garden
f. Wang – Rose town community musical in July at the Como Pavilion
g. Kistler – garden, bike and sail
h. Stockford – meetings, meetings, meetings! Lots of Lions events
F. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
1. April 15, 2024 Community Engagement Commission Meeting Minutes
2. May 6, 2024 Community Engagement Commission & Parks and Rec Commission Joint
Meeting Minutes
Lindstrom motion, Knight 2nd – unanimous approval
G. AGENDA
• Unfinished business
• Spring Together Review
1. Cooley-Kistler – Van der Werff handled the parking situation well to
make room for the food truck
2. Stockford – well attended
3. Van der Werff – sold a little over 200 pieces of ice cream the ticket
distribution was a little more strict than last year. The additional snacks
and Partners in Energy offerings helped. The timing difference may have
helped as well.
4. Group discussion – timing was good, a nice mid-day event that gives a
good end to the event and limits food expectations.
5. Van der Werff – leftover energy kits will be put out at city hall
6. Stockford – The energy table looked very engaged
7. King – saw good engagement with various citizens. Did not see many
people from her neighborhood. Overall it was a very positive event
8. Stockford – many newer residents were in attendance. It will be
interesting to see the feedback on all the questions posed.
9. Wang – the music was hard to hear if you were more than 10 feet away
from the speakers.
1. Knight – sometimes ambient music is better for events like this.
Consider continuing open mic for next year.
2. Stockford – possibly set up seating around the space next year.
3. Van der Werff – maybe promote it better next year.
4. Leighton – there were a few conflicting events – Art-a-Whirl,
Open Doors, and other events
10. Stockford requests that the city staff suggestions/event review notes be
shared with the commissions for consideration for future planning.
11. Wang – reads neighbor discussion feedback
1. Events like this and usually walking
2. Gardening
3. Chatting outside
4. Talking while outside
5. Usually to folks that live close
6. Neighborhood night out
7. Flamingo Fridays
8. Talking while in and out of the building
• Neighborhood Liaison Handbook
a. Stockford – at the last meeting we discussed a workshop – and asked group for
feedback
1. Knight – thought tonight was a working session and not a full agenda.
Suggests possibly moving things around for the handbook.
1. Move what is a liaison to the top
a. Combine What is a liaison and what does a liaison do
2. Followed by CEC Role
3. CEC explanation
4. Leighton supports
2. Lindstrom – suggests updating the order of paragraphs
1. What is a neighborhood liaison?
2. What does a neighborhood liaison do?
3. Goals
4. CEC explanation
5. CEC role
6. Code of Ethics
7. Does it take a lot of work?
8. What kind of information is the city looking for
9. City support
10. Combine points i, ii, and iii into one point with bullet points
3. Knight – add points of contact – who at the city is the individual (role or
person) to talk to and ask questions. Second by Stockford. Leighton
suggests adding the general city e-mail to the document
4. Lindstrom - Strike the second sentence in the first paragraph of the
existing “Does it take a lot of work” point. – Leighton, Knight, and Wang
agree
5. Van der Werff will make revisions and e-mail to commissioners and
provide a deadline for feedback
1. Plans to present the draft to the council pending discussion with
the City Administrator
6. Knight – once the document is finalized it may be of value to host
information session.
7. Stockford – possibly we can use the ice cream social as an opportunity to
engage with community members
• Apartment outreach
a. Clarification on timing – this will be planned to begin in September
b. No more than 2 council members (including Mayor) can attend each event
1. If there are more than 3 in attendance we would need to post the
information on the door of the city hall
2. Knight will develop a script for approaching property managers
1. Would like to start reaching out in June
2. Need council member availability and expectations
c. Stockford – Action item – have the council provide availability dates
d. Ebbesen – Verifying the plan is to connect with apartment property managers to
see if they have events planned that the commission can be included in and
schedule around that.
e. Verify if apartments have community/party rooms available to host, otherwise
we will plan around the weather
• CERT Training
a. Stockford – Leehy has an interest due to her involvement in the program. Do we
feel that this is something we should consider and continue.
b. Knight feels strongly that the program has value and would like the city to
support
c. Stockford – not a city-run program but this does need city support. The city does
not do training but will support it via having a location. The previous iteration
was hosted here. Unsure of training schedule. Need to get information to
understand what the training involves and what is available.
d. Stockford or Van der Werff will reach out to Kris Grangaard for more
information
e. Wang – do we put something out to gauge interest in the training
1. Stockford suggests Ice Cream Social
f. Knight verifies that the root question is if we want to get involved but we need to
get more information
g. Stockford – vote to agree we are interested in gathering more information and
generate a survey to gauge interest
1. Unanimous agreement
h. Next step – Stockford to reach out to Kris. Van der Werff will see what materials
we have in the city about the program. First survey opportunity at the ice cream
social.
• New Business
• International Institute Drive
a. Cooley-Kistler presented information regarding the International Institute's need
for resettlement items
1. Approached Stockford and Van der Werff to see if the City can provide a
drop-off for household items to support the efforts of the International
Institute to collect needed items
2. Stockford feels that it is not the position of the city to be involved in
immigration activities
3. Cooley-Kistler reminds the commission that we have held clothes drives
to support the International Institute in previous years
4. Stockford suggests gathering via personal networks and other groups (Do
Good Roseville, Lions Club Efforts) Lions, Rotary, Kiwanas and
Optimists are all close, can we aggregate those groups to do a big, long-
term drive?
1. Cooley-Kistler asks where the drop-off would be located
2. Stockford does not know but imagines they can find a place. His
point is that long-term this could be a good solution for this
support.
5. Knight agrees that this could be a concern since this is targeting a specific
group which could create friction. Is on board to support Cooley-Kistler
on a personal basis but this initiative is not within the commission's
purview
6. Leighton agrees and asks if Van der Werff could get any official opinion
of the city.
7. Wang – is there a historical precedence for something like this. Sharing
drop-off information vs holding a drop-off.
8. Van der Werff clarifies she has shared other similar drive information and
other service information. Believes that it would be reasonable.
H. INFORMATION/ANNOUNCEMENT
• Van der Werff – plans to cancel August meeting –
a. Group agrees to cancel August meeting
b. June 17th meeting will be held plan to include a final draft of the liaison
handbook and finalizing ice cream social details. Leighton and Wang will be
unable to attend on June 17.
c. July 15th meeting and Ice Cream Social July 18th
d. September 16th meeting
• Stockford – Lions Club fundraiser at Culver's on Rice Street – to support Do Good
Roseville on June 3rd. recurring event with different beneficiaries first Monday of every
other month.
J. ADJOURNMENT: 8:18 PM
Knight moves to adjourn – Unanimously approved
Next Regular Meeting is on Monday, June 17 at 6:30 PM
Agenda
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
Community Engagement Commission
City Hall
2077 West Larpenteur Avenue
AGENDA
May, 20 2024 at 6:30 P.M.
A. CALL TO ORDER:
B. WELCOME:
C. ROLL CALL:
Karen Cooley-Kistler____ Julie Ebbesen____ Zach Lindstrom____ Curt Stockford____
Mishy Wang___ Rebecca Leighton____ Denise King____
STAFF PRESENT:
Elke Van der Werff___
COUNCIL LIAISON:
Melanie Leehy____
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
E. PRESENTATION:
1. GET TO KNOW EACH OTHER
F. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
1. April 15, 2024 Community Engagement Commission Meeting Minutes
G. AGENDA
• Unfinished business
1. Neighborhood Liaison Handbook
H. INFORMATION/ANNOUNCEMENT
J. ADJOURNMENT:
Next Regular Meeting is on Monday, June 17 at 6:30 PM
1
BLANK PAGE
2
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
Community Engagement Commission
City Hall
2077 West Larpenteur Avenue
MINUTES
April, 15 2024 at 6:30 P.M.
A. CALL TO ORDER: 6:31 PM
B. WELCOME:
C. ROLL CALL:
Karen Cooley-Kistler_X_ Julie Ebbesen_X_ Zach Lindstrom_X_ Curt Stockford_X_
Mishy Wang_X_ Rebecca Leighton_X_ Denise King_X_
STAFF PRESENT:
Elke Van der Werff_X__
COUNCIL LIAISON:
Melanie Leehy__X__
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Agenda approved motioned Cooley-Kistler, 2nd King. Agenda approved unanimously.
E. PRESENTATION:
1. GET TO KNOW EACH OTHER
Commissioner introductions – introducing new commissioner Denise King
F. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
1. March 18, 2024 Community Engagement Commission & Parks and Rec Commission Joint
Meeting Minutes
Approval of minutes – Addition of Parks attendees prior to posting Motion Leighton, 2nd
Wang, Minutes approved unanimously.
G. AGENDA
• Unfinished business
• Neighborhood Liaison Handbook
o Leehy confirming goal of document to update information and
consolidate information.
3
o Stockton verified and that is correct. Some information was outdated and
the defined volunteer “roles” were more complicated and could have
been a barrier to participation.
o Leehy inquired about training opportunities similar to what the program
had earlier in the commission life time.
o Van der Werff discussed options for training/programming possibilities
in the future – including C.E.R.T training, first aid, car set checks, etc.
o Stockford recommends we will continue to discuss programs/activities
now that the commission is fully seated.
o Ebbesen stated that the existing list of liaisons was not up to date and
there was difficulty getting individuals on the existing list to respond to
requests to update information. The goal is to reduce the barrier to people
to identify themselves as liaisons and get involved.
o Leehy acknowledges that there are concerns with continued CERT
training but sees value in it. Stockford recommends the Lions program
for training opportunities as a place to start.
o Leehy CERT history – CERT develops a network of residents to activate
in response to an emergency. Came in handy for North Minneapolis
tornado in 20XX. Minneapolis CERT had then disbanded but other
trained citizen were able to assist. Currently tabled for Falcon Heights
and would take effort to review and dig in to reigniting the program.
o King- sees value in CERT program and believes it would be a benefit to
community members and the community itself. Consider grants and
highlighting opportunities for training “Early Bird” bonuses (priority
training) for those who would like to volunteer as neighborhood liaisons.
o King suggests revising and offering more reasons and why the program
and the participants are important. Consider creating 3 documents
including:
Informational 1 pager
Handbook
Detailed privacy standard
o Stockford – agrees the document is brief and uncomplicated. We
o Leighton – start with a recruitment flyer to sell people on the program
and then send them this document
o Leehy – Liaison program built to create a network of neighborhood
leaders and strengthen the sense of community. Would include a
representative from Police and Fire to attend meetings.
o Stockford – consider explaining the liaison concept vs the block captain
concept to generate visibility for the program.
o Stockford – take what we have today and edit so it does grab the
attention of the reader in the first couple of sentences.
o King proposes a working session to finalize the document. Could be
valuable to discuss with the other citizens. Leighton agrees.
4
o Leehy recommends that we come back next time with our suggestions
and adjustments.
o Lindstrom – agrees – feels that there is value to collecting perspectives
from other citizens.
o Van der Werff– at Spring Together have a CEC table focused on Liaison
program.
o Stockford – suggests “gimmick” to encourage participation – King
suggests neighborhood location map to show where people live –
posterboard with info about the program. Leehy – give ice cream ticket
and pin to place on map
o Possible questions to encourage participation and increase visibility of the
neighborhood liaison program
A leader in my community
Our neighborhood communicates by…
How do you keep in touch with your neighbors?
How do you care for your neighbors?
o MOTION – King propose we meet is a separate working session for 2-3
hours to revise and finalize Neighborhood liaison program. The motion
would be after the Spring Together event. 2nd Wang (May 20 6:30 PM)
Stockford suggests that the commissioners take time between now
and the workshop to generate ideas
Stockford suggests that commission members communicate
availability issues if 3 events in May (Park commission joint
meeting, Spring Together and CEC meeting) is too much for
anyone.
• New Business
1. Apartment Outreach
o Stockford – we are being asked to develop a schedule – he requests
councilmembers share availability.
o Ebbesen clarifies that these events are intended to include commission
members and councilmembers to gather at the apartment complexes to
connect with the renters and create a sense of community and find out
what renters are looking for and what community services are available
and how the city can support and welcome renters in the community.
o Leehy – when she was on the CEC she would independently plan “block
parties” for the apartments and connect with neighbors and apartment
management. For senior complexes they would set up during other
planned social gatherings. Find out with apartment facilities to see if
there are community rooms or spaces we might be able to host
something.
o Leehy – suggests to wait for at least 1 quarter due to current activity with
the police taskforce. Can only have two council members attend each
event.
5
o Stockford – Would need to identify resources. Leehy – look at grants.
Stockford – the commission will be tasked with planning and identifying
dates and times, then go to council with the plan and start scheduling
visits. Leehy – include City Administrator.
o King – suggest splitting the list of managers and commissioners each take
a group of contacts from the list and reach out to plan/schedule events.
o Leehy – suggests everyone uses the same script –King suggested scripts,
“Hi I’m {name} we are trying to connect with our apartment dwelling
residents to:
Share information about city resources
Hear what questions you have for the city
Would like to include residents in city discussions and activities
Want to make apartment dwellers feel welcome here in Falcon
Heights to create long term relationships
Leighton – the ask - Do you have space or existing meeting times
that we can hold coordinate with city commissioner and
councilmember, can we discuss a date/time we can schedule a
time to meet.
Goal meeting times September
o King will draft a script and share with Van der Werff and commissioners
can respond to Van der Werff individually.
o Stockford requests Leehy communicates to the council that we will be
moving forward.
2. Spring Together
o Stockford – Discuss reaching out to the apartment buildings to
communicate the event to rental properties. We can send pdf to current
list of managers and they will send to pdf to residents – King – suggests
adding ics file attachment for recipients to easily add to calendars
o Van der Werff– will have fliers, banner (at Curtiss Field), Lion’s sign (City
Hall)
o King will post on Nextdoor app
o Leighton will post in Falcon Heights neighbor facebook page
o Cooley-Kistler suggests CTC (U of M student housing)
o Stockford – Schools will publish if we can promote volunteer
opportunities to fulfill community involvement
o Van der Werffwill send flier and calendar file to apartment managers
o Cooley-Kistler will include digital flier in the Grove newsletter
o King will deliver fliers to Falcon Heights businesses
o Stockford will look for the contact for the major apartment manager
H. INFORMATION/ANNOUNCEMENT
6
J. ADJOURNMENT: 8:21 PM
Motion to Adjourn Ebbesen, 2nd King
Next Regular Meeting is on Monday, May 6 at 6:30 PM
7
BLANK PAGE
8
Meeting Date May 20, 2024
Agenda Item E1
Attachment Neighborhood Liaison Updated Handbook
Submitted By Elke van der Werff, Administrative &
Communications Coordinator
Item Neighborhood Liaison
Description The goal of the Community Engagement Commission is to review and update the
Neighborhood Liaison Handbook. The current online version was last revised on May,
2020.
Based on recent discussions, staff created an updated Liaison Handbook using parts of
the old handbook and suggestions from the commission.
We did a gathering of data at the recent Spring Together event of how residents
connect and interact with their neighbors these days. This data can be utilized to help
update the liaison handbook.
Budget Impact N/A
Attachment(s) • Neighborhood Liaison Updated Handbook
Action(s) Review and suggest edits to the updated Liaison Handbook
Requested
9
Neighborhood Liaison Handbook
Community Engagement Commission
The Community Engagement Commission (CEC) advises the City Council on matters related to human
needs, public awareness or local concerns, and human rights issues. It seeks ways that encourages all
citizens to participate in the civic and social life of the Falcon Heights. The commission helps plan and
facilitate Human Rights Day, the Ice Cream Social, and such other public events as may fulfill its
mission.
In the course of its mission it will:
- Recruit and retain neighborhood liaisons
- Identify areas with no liaison and focus recruitment efforts there.
- Update and distribute a neighborhood liaison handbook
- Implement appropriate Neighborhood Liaison training
- Provide suggestions on how to best communicate with the residents to keep our
neighborhoods connected with city government
- Act as a resource for neighborhood activities
- Recognize and work to include renters and apartment residents in Neighborhood Liaison
Program plans and activities
- Provide regular reports to the City Council on the Neighborhood Liaison Program
- Attend Neighborhood Liaison training sessions.
- Plan, implement and evaluate city-wide events to promote community building.
- Begin including Falcon Heights businesses in community engagement efforts.
- Annually elect officers and review CEC’s mission and goals progress, establish goals for the
upcoming year, and report these to the City Council at their annual retreat
Community Engagement Commission Role in the Neighborhood Liaison
Program:
The Community Engagement Commission (CEC) promotes opportunities for residents to be involved
by endorsing and facilitating community outreach events. They will act as a human-bridge, defining
ideas and activities that help to connect Falcon Heights City Council to the people they serve. The
Commission will support the neighborhood Liaison Program and serve as a liaison between
neighborhoods and the City Council. It will be the CEC’s responsibility to refer concerns and
recommendations that it receives from Neighborhoods through their Liaisons to the City Council for
consideration.
What is a Neighborhood Liaison?
A Neighborhood Liaison is an extension to the Community Engagement Commission that formalizes a
more localized outreach community engagement effort. They will provide a more familiar point of
access to the assigned neighborhood community, while building and strengthening relationships. They
will spend their time in the community talking with people, collecting suggested ideas, and forming
relationships to keep the community connected.
10
Goals:
Curate relationships with neighbors to create safe spaces, safe streets and a welcoming community.
Be a communication conduit between the city and your neighbors to help keep residents informed of
important city updates and notify the city of concerns among a given neighborhood.
Connect individuals throughout the city that have already or are willing to develop a neighborhood
network.
What does a Neighborhood Liaison do?
Help connect residents in your neighborhood by gathering and sharing contact information amongst
neighbors.
Find ways to connect neighbors through gatherings of any size. These could include Night to Unite,
block parties, cookie exchanges, happy hours, etc.
Receive and share regular updates from the city about upcoming city meetings and events, safety alerts
and other news. If concerns or issues are raised in the neighborhood the Neighborhood Liaison can
send information to the city.
Does it take a lot of work to be a Neighborhood Liaison?
Absolutely not! Many neighborhoods already have one or some people who already are connected on
their blocks or neighborhood. We’re want to connect with those individuals to be a point of contact for
the city.
There may be occasions to gather liaisons to share concerns or success stories as a group but there will
not be more that 3-4 voluntary meetings each year.
What kind of information is the city looking for?
The only contact information that the city will request is that of the individual(s) who volunteer to be
connected with the city as a liaison. Any information gathered among neighbors will not be sent to the
city, only shared with neighbors.
How will the city support the neighborhood liaisons?
The city will recommend communications, communication techniques and occasions to create
neighborhood gatherings throughout the year. For some events the city may supply kits or supplies to
help facilitate events.
Neighborhood Liaison Code of Ethics:
- Respect your neighbors
- Maintain a positive attitude and image
- Maintain local privacy of collected data
- Be a community builder
11
Get email alerts for Falcon Heights
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.