Planning & Zoning

AGENDA Planning & Zoning Commission City Council Chambers – 800 Municipal Drive August 26, 2021 - 3:00 p.m. Item 1 Call Meeting to Order 2 Approval of the Agenda 3 Approval of the Minutes of the August 12, 2021 P&Z Meeting 4 Petition No. FP 21-50 Discussion & Possible Action – Mesa Vista Subdivision #8 – a request from Mike Hamilton of Mesa View Development (Beth Escobar) 5 Discussion & Possible Action – Discussion & possible action regarding the Draft 2040 Navigating Farmington's Future Comprehensive Plan (Beth Escobar) 6 Discussion & Possible Action – Continued discussion and possible action regarding proposed changes to the 2021 Unified Development Code regarding Adult Use Cannabis (Beth Escobar) 7 Business From: Floor: Chairman: Members: Staff: 8 Adjournment The recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission is scheduled to be considered at the City Council Meeting on Tuesday, September 14, 2021. ATTENTION PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES: The meeting room and facilities are fully accessible to persons with mobility disabilities. If you plan to attend a meeting and need an auxiliary aid or service, please contact the City Clerk's office at 599-1101 or 599-1106, prior to the meeting so arrangements can be made.  Minutes Planning & Zoning Commission August 12, 2021 The Planning & Zoning Commission met in a regular session on August 12, 2021 at 3:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 800 Municipal Drive, Farmington, New Mexico. P&Z Members Present: Chair-Joyce Cardon Elizabeth Lockmiller Cheryl Ragsdale Mitch Sewell Gary Smouse P&Z Members Absent: Vice Chair Freeman Ryan Brown Shay Davis Cody Waldroup Staff Present: Beth Escobar Elizabeth Sandoval Karen Walker Others Who Addressed the Commission: Craig Stoabs Call to Order Chair Joyce Cardon called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. There being a quorum present the following proceedings were duly had and taken. Approval of the Agenda The motion was made by Commissioner Sewell and seconded by Commissioner Smouse to approve the agenda of the August 12, 2021 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. This motion passed unanimously by a 5-0 vote. Approval of the Minutes A motion was made by Commissioner Ragsdale and seconded by Commissioner Sewell to approve the minutes of the July 29, 2021 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. This motion was approved unanimously by a 5-0 vote. Swearing in of Witnesses Elizabeth Sandoval, Administrative Assistant, swore in all parties that wished to speak on behalf of the listed agenda items. Petition No. FP 21-41 Discussion and Possible Action – Desert Rose Subdivision Phase III; a request from Silver Ridge Development, Craig Stoabs, Property Owner Planning Manager Escobar presented the following: Subdivision Information: • A 14 lot, Class 1 subdivision • 4.39 acre portion of an undeveloped parcel • Phase III of Desert Rose • Preliminary Plan and Final Plat were approved in 2003. • The plat has been amended. • One-block • Property is zoned SF-7: Single Family Residential, 7,000 square feet minimum lot size • All lots conform with the underlying zoning • Aerial Map: Final Plat: Staff Recommendation: • The Community Works Department recommends approval of Petition 21-41, a request from Craig Stoabs of Silver Ridge Subdivision represented by Robert Echols of Cheney-Walters-Echols, Inc. for a final plat of a Class 1, 14-lot subdivision on a 4.39-acre portion of an undeveloped parcel located north at the north terminus of Beckland Drive in northeast Farmington. The lot sizes for Phase VII range from 7,000 square feet to 17,901 square feet. 1. All technical corrections to the plat and construction drawings will be finalized and approved prior to submittal of the final plat for signature, including noted issues in this report. 2. A subdivision agreement shall be required. 3. Infrastructure construction shall not commence without an approved construction permit from the City. Inspections shall be required. Discussion Chair Cardon asked if the issue brought up by the Wastewater Division regarding the pond was addressed. Planning Manager Escobar stated that it was addressed through the new construction plans. Commissioner Swell asked if this was Phase 7 of the subdivision. Planning Manager Escobar stated that this is Phase 3. Craig Stoabs, 4800 College Boulevard, stated that he does own the property on Pinon Hills Boulevard and the construction and plat issues have been reviewed with the Engineering Department. Chair Cardon asked if there was anyone who would like to speak regarding this petition. There was noone. Chair Cardon closed public comment and opened commissioner's discussion. There was no discussion. Motion A motion was made by Commissioner Smouse and seconded by Commissioner Ragsdale to recommend APPROVAL of FP 21-41 as recommended by staff. The motion carried unanimously 5-0. ______________________________________________________________________ Discussion & Possible Action – Discussion & Possible Action regarding Proposed Changes to the 2021 Unified Development Code regarding Adult Use Cannabis Beth Escobar, Planning Manager, presented the following presentation: Local Jurisdictions May: • Adopt time place and manner rules that do not conflict with the Cannabis Regulation Act or the Dee Johnson Clean Indoor Act; • This includes rules that reasonably limit density of licenses and operating times consistent with neighborhood uses • Allow for smoking, vaporizing and ingesting cannabis products within an indoor or outdoor cannabis consumption area if: • Unless licensed pursuant to the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act, access to the cannabis consumption area is restricted to persons twenty- one years of age or older; and • The cannabis establishment or microbusiness is located at a minimum distance from a school or daycare center as determined by the local jurisdiction- minimum distance cannot be more than 300 feet from a school or a daycare that is in existence at the time the business is licensed Local Jurisdictions Shall Not: • Prevent transportation of cannabis products on public roads by a licensee transports cannabis products in compliance with the Cannabis Regulation Act • Completely prohibit the operation of the licensee • Prohibit or limit signage attached to or located on licensed premises that identifies the premises as a cannabis establishment • Require a licensed premises or a cannabis consumption area to be any more than three hundred feet from a school or daycare center that was in existence at the time the cannabis establishment or integrated cannabis microbusiness was licensed • Require an existing licensee at a licensed premises to relocate • Prohibit a person from producing homegrown cannabis as provided in the cannabis regulation act  • Which means 6 plants per a person over 21 in the household with a maximum of 12 plants total General Provisions of the Law • A person can possess from 2 ounces up to 8 ounces • A person can only have 2 ounces physically on them the rest must be kept in a private location not viewable to the public if they are 21 or older • Marijuana drug paraphernalia is legal to possess • A person can have 6 plants in their house out of public view if they are 21 or older and if two or more people who are 21 or older reside in the house there is a maximum of 12 plants total • Prohibits the consumption of marijuana on sidewalk streets and public places Proposed Revisions to Municipal Ordinances • Possession of Drug Paraphernalia to reflect that if a person is 21 years of age or older that it is legal to possess marijuana drug paraphernalia • Possession of Marijuana to reflect the allowance of 2 to 8 ounces of marijuana under the law • No smoking in public places- propose a new ordinance limiting where marijuana can be smoked either in a cannabis consumption area or in the privacy of persons house. Would prohibit the smoking of marijuana in a car, the street, the sidewalk, public places or outdoor areas Proposed Revisions to the Unified Development Code • Allow retail sales in GC: General Commercial only • Allow production and manufacturing in GC and Industrial Districts with a Special Use Permit • Cultivation not allowed within the City Areas colored in blue are GC (general commercial), where retails sales would be allowed and production would be allowed in industrial zoning. Proposed Revisions to the Unified Development Code  • Specifically exclude cultivation for retail use in RA: Rural Agriculture • Cultivation of cannabis and manufacturing of cannabis/cannabidiol products for retail sales are not permitted as a Home Occupation. • Prohibit sale of cannabis products from Mobile Food Units • Limit number of retail sales facilities to 25 Conclusion • These recommended revisions balance support for this new economic segment while protecting public health and safety. • Proposed revisions are consistent with existing zoning regulations. Discussion Commissioner Sewell asked why the verbiage is “legal possession from 2 ounces up to 8 ounces” and not just "up to 8 ounces". Planning Manager Escobar stated that she would ask. Commissioner Swell asked, with the limiting of the number of sales facilities, how will those be allocated. Planning Manager Escobar stated that it would be on a first come first serve basis. The applicants would go through the State of New Mexico to be licensed and then obtain a business license with the City of Farmington. Chair Cardon asked if changes could be made to the UDC as the process starts and could variances be issued. Planning Manager Escobar stated that was correct and special use permits would allow us to bring applications forward to the Planning & Zoning Commission. Commissioner Smouse asked Planning Manager Escobar if the reason this is being brought to the Planning & Zoning Commission's attention is because the commission could be seeing some petitions regarding cannabis. Planning Manager Escobar stated yes, as well as for a recommendation to move these recommendations forward to City Council. Commissioner Smouse asked if these recommendations are coming from staff or from City Council. Planning Manager Escobar stated the recommendations are coming from staff and this presentation has been made to City Council, other than adopting the limit, council had very little input. Chair Cardon stated that she is fine with the recommendations as long as they are open ended. Commissioner Smouse stated that with this just being brought forward he does feel uneducated. Planning Manager Escobar stated that the discussion could be brought back if there is something the commission would like her to explore; action does not need to be taken today. Commissioner Smouse stated that he would like a little more time to educate himself on the subject. Commissioner Sewell asked what types of special use permits the commission would hear regarding cannabis. Planning Manager Escobar stated production and manufacturing in industrial and general commercial zoning. Commissioner Sewell asked how delivery of cannabis would be handled and can access be regulated to public roads. Planning Manager Escobar stated that the State of New Mexico will license the cannabis transporter, licensed transporters can deliver anywhere and access cannot be regulated. Commissioner Sewell asked if transporters would only deliver bulk or if they could deliver personal amounts of cannabis. Planning Manager Escobar stated that they can deliver bulk and personal amounts and it will be the responsibility of the transporter to verify the age of the person that the cannabis is being delivered to; the transporters would have to go through training and also be insured. Planning Manager Escobar asked the commission if there were any specific questions that they would like to see addressed and brought back to at the next meeting. Chair Cardon stated that there are vital commissioners not in attendance and she would like to get their input on the discussion. Commissioner Lockmiller stated that she agrees with Chair Cardon and that what is being presented today is all that she has heard on the topic of cannabis. Commissioner Smouse asked if any of the recommendations being heard today are based upon any other jurisdictions. Planning Manager Escobar stated that jurisdictions in Arizona and Colorado were looked into; discussions were had with the Community Development Director of Aztec and with San Juan County. Commissioner Smouse asked if the State of New Mexico allows municipalities to opt out. Planning Manager Escobar stated no, the State of New Mexico is all in. Planning Manager Escobar stated that she would send the commissioners that are not in attendance today and email and also email all commissions some links on general information regarding today’s discussion. Planning Manager Escobar reminded the commission that each commissioner should only email her and not to the entire commission to keep in line with the Open Meetings Act. Commissioner Sewell asked what the consequences are for smoking cannabis outside. Planning Manager Escobar stated that the prohibition of smoking cannabis outside follows state law. Planning Manager Escobar stated that the retail areas are only allowed in general commercial zoning areas, but will not be allowed downtown which is zoned as central business. Planning Manager Escobar stated that it was intentional to exclude downtown due to the public input that was received from over a hundred citizens, as time goes on the exclusion could be reevaluated. Commissioner Smouse asked if the commission could get some insight on how the City Council feels regarding the cannabis recommendations. Planning Manager Escobar stated that she would email the link to the City Council meeting where this topic was discussed. Commissioner Smouse stated that he would like to make sure that any recommendations made by the commission are not creating any additional hardships on law enforcement. Planning Manager Escobar stated that the proposed recommendations have also been shared with the Police and Fire Department and their input has been received and they support the recommendations that are being brought forth. Commissioner Lockmiller asked how many retail medical marijuana outlets are there in the city and what happens to their licenses. Planning Manager Escobar stated that there are three and if the business is in good standing, they will become a retailer. Commissioner Lockmiller asked if any of the three businesses did cultivation of cannabis. Planning Manager Escobar stated that not that she knows of, but if they do, then their business would become legal non-conforming. Planning Manager Escobar stated that the State of New Mexico has also not allowed the restriction of cannabis facilities near churches, which was a restriction with medical marijuana. Commissioner Lockmiller stated that in her opinion she does understand that there does need to be regulations and rules regarding cannabis, but because marijuana is now legal does not mean everyone is going to go out and smoke marijuana and does not think that there is going to be an influx. Commissioner Smouse asked if the City Council has made a decision about the transportation of cannabis and the consumption and possession of cannabis in a vehicle. Planning Manager Escobar stated that she believes that there are still councilors that are not in consensus, but the City Attorney is working to get documentation together to present to get consensus from City Council. Chair Cardon stated that she feels that from what she has heard today and with the absence of several commissioners, she feels that more time is needed to make a recommendation. Chair Cardon asked for more information to be presented by staff at the next Planning & Zoning meeting. ______________________________________________________________________ Business from the Floor: There was no business from the Floor. Business from the Chair: There was no business from the Chair. Business from the Members: There was no business from Members. Business from Staff: Planning Manager Escobar stated that she will send out the Comp Plan in digital format on Monday for commissioner comments and questions. David Sypher, Community Works Director, filmed a Mayor's Table episode on the topic of the Comp Plan as well. Planning Manager Escobar asked the commission to please take time to read the Comp Plan. Adjournment: With no further business and a motion to adjourn was made by Commissioner Ragsdale and seconded by Commissioner Sewell. The motion carried unanimously 5-0 and the meeting was adjourned at 3:58 p.m. ____________________________ _____________________________ Joyce Cardon Elizabeth Sandoval Chair Administrative Assistant  Staff Report PP 21-50 Mesa Vista #8 - Page 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Mesa Vista #8 Petition No. FP 21-50 A. STAFF REPORT, July 29, 2021 PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Mike Hamilton/Mesa View Development Representative Paul Martin, Sakura Engineering Date of Application August 16, 2021 Requested Action Final Plat Approval Location Parcel No. 2072171297198, south of Wildflower Mesa Drive. Existing Zoning MF-M Multi-family Medium Density Surrounding North: MF-M, undeveloped South: IND - Industrial Zoning and Land East: RA-San Juan Detention Center Use West: PD- Mesa Vista #7 Subdivision Class Class 1 Notice Final Plat Staff Planner Beth Escobar, Planning Manager SUBDIVISION INFORMATION Number of Lots 77 Lots plus one drainage detention pond Acres of Land 20.00 Acres Minimum Lot Size 7,000 square feet Utilities Water: Per City Standards Sewer: Per City Standards Electric: Per FEUS Engineering Access & Per City Standards Circulation Street Lights Per City Standards Street Sign Per City Standards Fire Hydrants Per City Standards Drainage Per City Standards P & R’s Fees Per City Standards NBU Mail Box Coordinate with USPS  Staff Report PP 21-50 Mesa Vista #8 - Page 2 GENERAL INFORMATION The petitioner is requesting final plat approval for the Mesa Vista #8, a Class 1, 77-lot subdivision on a 20-acre portion of an undeveloped parcel located south of Wildflower Mesa Drive. Farmington. Lot sizes for Phase VII range from 7,240 square feet to 1,106 square feet. The plat also includes a drainage pond located in the southwest corner. The proposed subdivision is an addition to previous Mesa Vista Subdivisions developed on properties to the west. Phase VII, No. 1 is the first stage of Phase VII, which received preliminary plan approval from the City Council on January 26, 2021. This phase includes one, non-buildable lot (#4). A 60-foot wide gas line right-of-way transects the northern portion of the plat. ISSUES IDENTIFIED DURING INITIAL REVIEW Toni Sita – Engineering The City has not received documentation that the detention pond area of 0.241 acres is sufficient for the required drainage. Sakura provided a watershed model schematic with a hydrograph summary report. This report is not sufficient for engineering staff to do our reviews for drainage detention pond sizing. What I need and what I have asked for multiple times is for the engineer (Sakura) to provide a written statement of what these calculations mean. I specifically need the engineer (Sakura) to make a written statement with the following information: 1) What is the required pond sizing/detention for this development? 2) What are the dimensions of the pond to be placed? 3) Is the lot size of 0.241 acres (proposed on Final Plat), large enough to accommodate the pond area and volume required for this development? In the original submittal, Sakura's calculations, stated on their plans, showed a required volume for detention that was 3 times greater than the proposed pond. The revised calculations need to show that the pond is equal to or greater in size and volume capacity than the requirement for the development. I have yet to receive plans from Sakura that show calculations and ponding size that correlate with required detention for development. Without correct information from Sakura, regarding drainage, I am unable to determine if the 0.241 acre lot proposed in this subdivision for the detention pond is sufficient. Staff Comment: These issues have been addressed through submittal of a revised Drainage report. Per Section 8.8.4 of the Unified Development Code, all subdivisions shall comply with the following minimum standards: A. Design and improvement standards. All subdivisions shall be designed and constructed in accordance with applicable requirements of:  Staff Report PP 21-50 Mesa Vista #8 - Page 3 (1) Article 5, development standards; and (2) Article 6, subdivision design and improvements. Staff Comments: Through staff review, the plat as presented meets, or will be required to meet through stipulations of approval, development standards and design and improvement requirements. The developer shall be obligated to construct and dedicate the extension of Wildflower Mesa Drive through to Andrea Drive. B. Waivers. The commission may recommend and the council may approve, approve with conditions, or deny waivers of the standards in section 6.4, subdivision design standards, during the platting process. Staff Comments: No waivers are requested for this application. C. Zoning consistency. All subdivisions and the resulting lots shall be consistent with the requirements of the applicable underlying zone district. Staff Comments: All lots conform to the minimum standards of the MF-M: Multi- family Low Density residential zoning district. D. Comprehensive plan consistency. All subdivisions shall be reviewed for consistency with the comprehensive plan, and every plat approved by the city shall constitute an amendment, addition or a detail of the comprehensive plan or part thereof adopted by the commission. Staff Comments: The proposed single-family use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use map which designates this area as Residential Single Family Suburban.  Staff Report PP 21-50 Mesa Vista #8 - Page 4 Zoning Map  Staff Report PP 21-50 Mesa Vista #8 - Page 5 Aerial Map of Surrounding Area Subject Property  Staff Report PP 21-50 Mesa Vista #8 - Page 6 FINAL PLAT SHEET ONE  Staff Report PP 21-50 Mesa Vista #8 - Page 7 FINAL PLAT SHEET TWO  Staff Report PP 21-50 Mesa Vista #8 - Page 8 STAFF CONCLUSION Staff concludes approval of Petition 21-50, Mesa Vista #8, is appropriate, subject to technical and corrective changes as enumerated in this report. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Works Department recommends approval of Petition 21-50, a request from Mike Hamilton, represented by Paul Martin of Sakura Engineering, for a final plat of a Class 1, 77-lot subdivision on a 20-acre undeveloped parcel located south of the terminus of Wildflower Mesa Drive. 1. All technical corrections to the plat and construction drawings will be finalized and approved prior to submittal of the final plat for signature, including noted issues in this report. 2. The Summary Plat for Amended Cecil’s Subdivision No. 2 Replat A dedicating the right-of-way for the extension of Wildflower Drive shall be recorded prior to recording of the final plat for Mesa Vista No. 8. 3. A subdivision agreement shall be required. The subdivision agreement shall include the obligation of the developer to construct to City standards and dedicate the extension of Wildflower Mesa Drive to Andrea Drive. Staff Report PP 21-50 Mesa Vista #8 - Page 9  Staff Report PP 21-50 Mesa Vista #8 - Page 10 PLANNING MEMO COMMENTS SUMMARY FP 21-50 MESA VISTA NO. 8 DEADLINE: 8/18/2021 City of Farmington Departments CW Planning Manager – B. Escobar CW Addressing – Planning Division CW Chief Building Official – D. Childers No Comment CW Long Range Planner CW MPO – P. Koeppel CW Oil & Gas Inspector CITY City Manager’s Office – J. Baird No Comment ELEC Customer Care Manager – L. Richardson ELEC Electrical Engineering –Roberto Ga No Comment ELEC T&D – Field Op – L. Lugenbeel FIRE Fire Captain – K. Rix FIRE Fire Marshall – B. Vega LEGAL City Attorney – J. Breakell LEGAL Deputy City Attorney – E. Wayne POLICE Code Compliance – M. Romero POLICE Sergeant – S. Goodsell PRCA Parks - R. Crosby PRCA ORII – W. Unsicker CW City Engineer – I. BlueEyes CW The City has still not received documentation that the detention pond area of 0.241 acres is sufficient for the required drainage. Sakura provided a watershed model schematic with a hydrograph summary report. This report is not sufficient for engineering staff to do our reviews for Engineering – T. Sitta drainage detention pond sizing. What I need and what I have asked for multiple times is for the engineer (Sakura) to provide a written statement of what these calculations mean. I specifically need the engineer (Sakura) to make a written statement with the following information:  Staff Report PP 21-50 Mesa Vista #8 - Page 11 1) What is the required pond sizing/detention for this development? 2) What are the dimensions of the pond to be placed? 3) Is the lot size of 0.241 acres (proposed on Final Plat), large enough to accommodate the pond area and volume required for this development? In the original submittal, Sakura's calculations, stated on their plans, showed a required volume for detention that was 3 times greater than the proposed pond. The revised calculations need to show that the pond is equal to or greater in size and volume capacity than the requirement for the development. I have yet to receive plans from Sakura that show calculations and ponding size that correlate with required detention for development. Without correct information from Sakura, regarding drainage, I am unable to determine if the 0.241 acre lot proposed in this subdivision for the detention pond is sufficient. CW Streets Superintendent – C. Fuller CW Traffic Engineer – M. Hathcock CW Water/Waste Water – D. Dalton Other Entities New Mexico Gas Company – R. Castillo CenturyLink – D. Willato Enterprise Field Services – M. Waszut No Comment Comcast Cable – M. Johnson JACOBS CH2MHILL OMI Surface Land Negotiator for BP – M. Venzara Farmington School District – C. Lyons  Memo To: Farmington Planning & Zoning Commission From: Beth Escobar, Planning Manager Date: August 26, 2021 Subject: 2040 Comprehensive Plan – Navigating Farmington’s Future Background A comprehensive plan provides a vision for the community on how to guide development for the next twenty years. It provides a long-range, high-altitude view, of strategies to ensure that the City is moving in the right direction. The Comp Plan is not a regulatory document, like the Unified Development Code. The Comp plan identifies the community assets that should be strengthened and preserved, and what components we want to bring to the City to make it an even better place to live. September 2019 was the kick off date for the Comprehensive Plan update. Working with our consultant, Logan Simpson, a series of meetings were held with a Technical Committee, made up of staff, and a Steering Committee, made up of stakeholders from the community. These two committees identified the important topics. Through these meetings, the framework maps and vision statements in Part 3 of the plan were developed. Public input was solicited early on in the process, including information booths at the Downtown 4 x 4 Takeover, San Juan County Health Fair and Booapaloza in 2019. A website was setup dedicated to the Comp Plan with the ability for the public to submit comments and complete surveys. On January 30, 2020 the City hosted the Jolt Your Future event at the Civic Center. This catered event was open to the public and presented speakers on four topics identified as critical to Farmington’s future: 1. Outdoor Recreation 2. Becoming a retirement friendly community 3. Broadband connectivity 4. The Film Industry Over 200 people attended the event and provided feedback that has been incorporated into the plan. After correlating input from the committees and public, a draft plan was created and made available in December 2020. Because of the health restrictions related to the pandemic, the Council decided to postpone additional public outreach regarding the plan until restrictions eased. This lead to a 30-day intensive outreach public outreach process to gather comments on the draft plan from July 6 through August 6, 2021. What is in the plan? In Chapter 2, the plan provides a snapshot of where Farmington is at today, including population and economic information. It also includes information on internal and external transportation networks, and provides a visual of land ownership surrounding the Farmington metropolitan area. Chapter 3 provides a framework for moving forward within several segments, including housing, land use, transportation, downtown, parks and recreation and economic development. The goals identified for each segment will guide future development. Chapter 4 includes the Future Land Use Plan. This map does not change the zoning of any individual properties, but provides a vision the best locations for types of future development such as retirement communities and mixed use commercial and residential developments. What happens after the plan is adopted? This will not be a sit on the shelf plan. Staff is currently working on sorting through the Strategic Action Plan in Part 5 and identifying those actions that should and can be addressed within the next five years. A copy of the Implementation Strategies, with those projects highlighted that will require Commission input, is attached with this report. The plan will be evaluated every five years to gauge progress and the implementation plan will be adjusted to ensure priorities are being addressed. In addition, the updated comprehensive plan will provide recommendations to guide Farmington’s governing bodies in decision-making, such as evaluating zone change requests, and to move policy and development forward in an intentional and productive way. From conversations we’ve had with the community, we know that there are an array of challenges and opportunities with the potential to transform Farmington into a healthy and sustainable economy for the future. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan will serve as our guidebook to get us there. Action Staff is asking the Commission to provide input and possible direction to Council. 'ŽĂůϭ͘,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞĂƩĂŝŶĂďůĞ͕ĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞ͕ĂŶĚƋƵĂůŝƚLJŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĂŶĚŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐƚŚĂƚŵĞĞƚƚŚĞŶĞĞĚƐŽĨƚŚĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐĂŶĚƌĞƐƉŽŶĚƚŽ ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͘ ĐƟŽŶ ĐƟŽŶ >ĞĂĚ /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ Measurement ĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ ŐĞŶĐLJ 0-5 Years ZĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌLJ ZĞĨŽƌŵ 1.1 Update code, zoning map, and regula- ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ZĞǀŝƐĞƚŚĞh EĞǁĐŽĚĞĂŶĚ ƟŽŶƐƚŽĂůůŽǁĂŶĚƉƌŽŵŽƚĞƚŚĞƵŶŝĨŽƌŵ tŽƌŬƐʹ ƚŽĂůůŽǁĨŽƌŵŝdž ƌĞŐƵůĂƟŽŶƐĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ͕ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶĂŶĚŝŶĮůůƌĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨ Planning ŽĨƵƐĞƐŝŶĂƉƉƌŽ- ŝŶĮůůĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĂǀĂƌŝĞƚLJŽĨŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŽƉƟŽŶƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ŝǀŝƐŝŽŶĂŶĚ ƉƌŝĂƚĞĂƌĞĂƐ ŽĐĐƵƌƐ ƚƌĂĚŝƟŽŶĂůƐƵďĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶƐ͕ŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞĚĞ- Building ǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƐƚĂƌƚĞƌŚŽŵĞƐ͕ƐĞŶŝŽƌůŝǀŝŶŐ͕ ŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚĐůƵƐƚĞƌŚŽŵĞƐ͘ 1.2 ŶŐĂŐĞĞīŽƌƚƐǁŝƚŚůŽĐĂůďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂŶĚĞŶ- ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ĚŽƉƚĂǁƌŝƩĞŶ /ŶĐƌĞĂƐĞŝŶŶĞǁ ĞƌŐLJŐƌŽƵƉƐƚŽǁŽƌŬĂƚƚŚĞƐƚĂƚĞůĞǀĞůƚŽ tŽƌŬƐʹ ƉŽůŝĐLJƐƵƉ- ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐƵƐŝŶŐƐƵƐ- ĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞƚŚĞƵƐĞŽĨĂůƚĞƌŶĂƟǀĞ͕ĞŶĞƌŐLJ Building ƉŽƌƟŶŐĞŶĞƌŐLJ ƚĂŝŶĂďůĞƉƌĂĐƟĐĞƐ ĞĸĐŝĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŵĂƚĞƌŝ- ŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĞĸĐŝĞŶĐLJĂŶĚ ĂůƐĨŽƌŶĞǁŚŽŵĞƐĂŶĚƌĞƚƌŽĮƚƐ͘ ƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚLJ 1.4 ŽŶƟŶƵĞƚŽƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ĞǀĞůŽƉĂŵĂƉ WƵďůŝĐĂƟŽŶŽĨŽǀĞƌ- ůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐĨŽƌƐŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJĂŶĚŵƵůƟĨĂŵ- tŽƌŬƐʹ ŽǀĞƌůĂLJŝĚĞŶƟ- ůĂLJŵĂƉ ŝůLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůĂƌĞĂƐĂƐƐŚŽǁŶŽŶƚŚĞ Planning ĨLJŝŶŐƐƵŝƚĂďůĞ ϮϬϰϬ&ƵƚƵƌĞ>ĂŶĚhƐĞWůĂŶ͕ƚĂŬŝŶŐŝŶƚŽ ŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ ůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƟŽŶĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJ͕ƐŝƚĞƐƵŝƚĂďŝůŝƚLJ͕ ĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĨĂĐƚŽƌƐ͕ĂŶĚƵƟůŝƚLJĂŶĚŝŶ- ĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂǀĂŝůĂďŝůŝƚLJ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƉƵďůŝĐ ƐĂĨĞƚLJĂŶĚƐĐŚŽŽůŶĞĞĚƐ͘ 1.8 ĚŽƉƚĐƵƌƌĞŶƚǀĞƌƐŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞĮƌĞĂŶĚ Legal ƌĂŌŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞ Ordinance adopted ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞĐŽĚĞƐ ďLJŽƵŶĐŝů Program/ ZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ 1.3 WƌŽǀŝĚĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶ WƵďůŝĐĂƟŽŶĂŶĚ ƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ;Ğ͘Ő͘ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĂŶĚƉŽ- tŽƌŬƐʹ ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĂů ĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƟŽŶŽĨďƌŽ- ƚĞŶƟĂůƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐͿƚŽŚĞůƉŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƚŚĞ Planning ďƌŽĐŚƵƌĞ ĐŚƵƌĞ ŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨĞŶĞƌŐLJͲĞĸĐŝĞŶƚ͕ĂŐĞͲŝŶͲƉůĂĐĞ & Building ŚŽŵĞƐ͕ĂŶĚĂůƚĞƌŶĂƟǀĞĂŶĚƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞ ŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĂŶĚƉƌĂĐƟĐĞƐ͘ 1.10 ĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶĚƉƌŽŵŽƚĞĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶĂů Fire, Police ĞǀĞůŽƉĂWZ >ĂƵŶĐŚŝŶŐŽĨĐĂŵ- ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƚŚĂƚĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƟŽŶ ĂŶĚWƵďůŝĐ ĐĂŵƉĂŝŐŶƵƐŝŶŐ ƉĂŝŐŶ͘ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶ ĂŶĚĞŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚƚŽĞŶĂďůĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐͬ īĂŝƌƐ ƉƌŝŶƚΘƐŽĐŝĂů ŽĨĐĂŵƉĂŝŐŶǁŝůůďĞ ďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐŽǁŶĞƌƐŝŶŬĞĞƉŝŶŐƚŚĞŝƌŚŽŵĞƐͬ media ĚŽŶĞŝŶŶĞdžƚĮǀĞ ďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐĐůĞĂŶĂŶĚƐĂĨĞ͘ LJĞĂƌƐ͘ 1.12 ŽŶƟŶƵĞƚŽǁŽƌŬǁŝƚŚƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐĂŶĚ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ĞǀĞůŽƉĂƌĞ- Updated CDBG ŝĚĞŶƟĨLJŶĞǁŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƟŽŶƐĂŶĚƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ tŽƌŬƐʹ ƐŽƵƌĐĞĚĂƚĂďĂƐĞ ǁĞďƐŝƚĞ ƚŽĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞŚŽŵĞŽǁŶĞƌƐŚŝƉĂŶĚƋƵĂůŝƚLJ͕ CDBG Plan- ƚŚĂƚŝƐƵƉĚĂƚĞĚ ĂƩĂŝŶĂďůĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĨŽƌůŽǁͲƚŽŵŽĚĞƌĂƚĞͲ ner ĂŶŶƵĂůůLJĂŶĚ ŝŶĐŽŵĞŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐ͘ ƉƵďůŝƐŚĞĚƚŽ ƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ͘ NAVIGATING FARMINGTON’S FUTURE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | A - III ĐƟŽŶ ĐƟŽŶ >ĞĂĚ /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ Measurement ĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ ŐĞŶĐLJ 0-5 Years 1.15 /ŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƚĞĂŶĚŝŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞĨƵŶĚƐ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶŽŶ- KďƚĂŝŶŐƌĂŶƚĨƵŶĚ- ĨŽƌŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƉƌŽ- tŽƌŬƐʹ ůŝŶĞŝŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJŽĨ ŝŶŐĨŽƌŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚ ŐƌĂŵƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƚŚĞƵƐĞŽĨŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ CDBG Plan- ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶ ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚůŽĐŬ'ƌĂŶƚĨƵŶĚƐ͘ ner WůĂŶͬ^ƚƵĚLJ ϭ͘ϱtŽƌŬǁŝƚŚƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƟŽŶƐƚŽ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ /ĚĞŶƟĨLJĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ WƵďůŝĐĂƟŽŶŽĨ,ŽƵƐ- ĐŽŶƟŶƵĞƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ tŽƌŬƐʹ ĨŽƌĂŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŝŶŐ^ƚƵĚLJ ĨŽƌĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘;ŝ͘Ğ͘ĞdžĞŵƉƟŽŶŽĨ CDBG Plan- ƐƚƵĚLJŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĨĞĞƐ͕ŐƌĂŶƚƐͿ͘ ning ƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐĨŽƌ ƉƌŽŵŽƟŶŐĂŶĚ ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐĂīŽƌĚ- ĂďůĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŶĞĞĚƐĂƐŝĚĞŶƟ- ĮĞĚ 'ŽĂůϮ͘ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͗ĂƉŝƚĂůŝnjĞŽŶƚŚĞ&ŽƵƌŽƌŶĞƌƐ͛ǁŽƌŬĨŽƌĐĞ ĂŶĚŝŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĞƐƚŽƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚĞŶĂŶĚĂƩƌĂĐƚŝŶŶŽǀĂƟǀĞĂŶĚƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞ ďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐĐŽŶĚƵĐŝǀĞƚŽĚŝǀĞƌƐŝĨLJŝŶŐĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐĂŶĚƚŽ ŽīĞƌŝŶŐƐĞĐƵƌĞ͕ůŝǀŝŶŐͲǁĂŐĞũŽďƐ͘ ĐƟŽŶ ĐƟŽŶ >ĞĂĚŐĞŶĐLJ /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ Measurement ĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ 0-5 Years ZĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌLJ ZĞĨŽƌŵ 2.3 ŶƐƵƌĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞnjŽŶŝŶŐƚŽ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ŶĂůLJnjĞĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ ĚŽƉƚƌĞǀŝƐŝŽŶƐƚŽƚŚĞ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚĞǀŝĂďŝůŝƚLJŽĨĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ tŽƌŬƐʹWůĂŶ- njŽŶŝŶŐŝŶƌĞůĂƟŽŶ hĂŶĚŽŶŝŶŐDĂƉ͘ ĂŶĚŶĞǁĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůĚĞǀĞůŽƉ- ŶŝŶŐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ to Future Land ment. hƐĞDĂƉ͕ĚĞ- ǀĞůŽƉŶĞǁƵƐĞ ĐĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĞƐ͘ 2.7 ŽŶĞƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ŶĂůLJnjĞĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ ĚŽƉƚƌĞǀŝƐŝŽŶƐƚŽƚŚĞ ŝŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂůĂŶĚĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚ tŽƌŬƐʹWůĂŶ- njŽŶŝŶŐŝŶƌĞůĂƟŽŶ hĂŶĚŽŶŝŶŐDĂƉ ĂƌĞĂƐ;ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐůŝŐŚƚͲ ŶŝŶŐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ to Future Land ŝŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂůͬŵĂŶƵĨĂĐƚƵƌŝŶŐ hƐĞDĂƉ͕ĚĞ- ƐƉĂĐĞƐͿĂƚĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞ ǀĞůŽƉŶĞǁƵƐĞ ĐĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĞƐ͘ ůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐǁŚŝůĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌŝŶŐ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶƌŽƵƚĞƐĂŶĚ ;ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞǁŝƚŚ ďĞŝŶŐƐĞŶƐŝƟǀĞƚŽƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐ Ϯ͘ϯͿ ůĂŶĚƵƐĞƐ͘ A - IV | NAVIGATING FARMINGTON’S FUTURE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ĐƟŽŶ ĐƟŽŶ >ĞĂĚŐĞŶĐLJ /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ Measurement ĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ 0-5 Years Program/ ZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ 2.8 /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚƉƌŽŵŽƚĞƐŚŽƉͲ Economic De- &ŽƌŵĂůŝnjĞĂ^ŚŽƉ Adopt a Shop Local ůŽĐĂůŝŶŝƟĂƟǀĞƐƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ ǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ Local Farmington Farmington Program ůŽĐĂůďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂŶĚƚĂdžďĂƐĞ͕ Program includ- ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĞdžƚĞŶĚŝŶŐŽƉĞŶŝŶŐ ŝŶŐŝŶĐĞŶƟǀĞƐ͕ ŚŽƵƌƐ͘ ƉƵďůŝĐƌĞůĂƟŽŶƐ program. 2.12 ŶƐƵƌĞĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐĞīŽƌƚƐĂƌĞ Economic De- ĞǀĞůŽƉĂƚĂƌŐĞƚ DĞĞƚƚĂƌŐĞƚĚĞǀĞůŽƉ- ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĞīŽƌƚƐ ǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĨŽƌŶĞǁƐĞŶŝŽƌ ment ƚŚĂƚƉƌŽŵŽƚĞƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉ- ůŝǀŝŶŐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝ- ŵĞŶƚĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŽĨϲϱн ƟĞƐ;^ĞĞ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ ƐĞŶŝŽƌůŝǀŝŶŐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ͘ 'ŽĂůϭ͘ϭͿ 2.19 /ĚĞŶƟĨLJĂŶĚƉƵƌƐƵĞƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ KZ//ΘŝƚLJ ĞǀĞůŽƉĂTour Implement Program ƚŚĂƚĐĂŶŚĞůƉĚĞǀĞůŽƉƚŽƵƌƐ DĂŶĂŐĞƌ͛ƐKĨ- Farmington Pro- ŽĨďŽƚŚĐŝƚLJůĂŶĚŵĂƌŬƐĂŶĚ ĮĐĞ͕ZĞĚƉƉůĞ gram ŽƵƚĚŽŽƌƌĞĐƌĞĂƟŽŶĂƌĞĂƐ͘ dƌĂŶƐŝƚ 2.25 tŽƌŬǁŝƚŚ>DƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞĂ KZ//ĂŶĚ>D ĚŽƉƚĂĮůŵͬ /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ ƐƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶĞĚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƉƌŽ- ǀŝĚĞŽůŝĐĞŶƐŝŶŐ ĐĞƐƐĨŽƌƵƐĞŽĨƚŚĞŝƌůĂŶĚǁŚŝůĞ ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ ŵĂŬŝŶŐǀŝĚĞŽĂŶĚĮůŵƐ͘ WůĂŶͬ^ƚƵĚLJ 2.4 ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶŽĨĚĞƐŝŐŶͲ Economic De- ĚĂƉƚĂŶĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐ WƵďůŝƐŚĂŶĚƐŚĂƌĞĂŶĂůLJ- ďĂƐĞĚĐŽĚĞĂƐĂƉŽƐƐŝďůĞǁĂLJ ǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ŽĨĚĞƐŝŐŶͲďĂƐĞĚ ƐŝƐ ƚŽĂĐŚŝĞǀĞĐŽŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ĐŽĚĞĂŶĚŝƚƐ ĂŶĚĐŽŶŐƌƵĞŶƚƵƐĞƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ ĂƉƉůŝĐĂďŝůŝƚLJƚŽ zoning. ĂƌĞĂƐŽĨ&ĂƌŵŝŶŐ- ton 'ŽĂůϯ͘>ĂŶĚhƐĞĂŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͗WůĂŶĂŶĚĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ͕ŝŶŶŽǀĂ- ƟǀĞ͕ĂŶĚĨƵŶĐƟŽŶĂůůĂŶĚƵƐĞĂŶĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ ĐƟŽŶĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ ĐƟŽŶ >ĞĂĚŐĞŶĐLJ /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ Measurement ZĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌLJZĞĨŽƌŵ 3.1 hƐĞƚŚĞϮϬϰϬ&ƵƚƵƌĞ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ŶĂůLJnjĞĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ ĚŽƉƚƌĞǀŝƐŝŽŶƐƚŽƚŚĞ >ĂŶĚhƐĞWůĂŶƚŽƌĞ- tŽƌŬƐʹWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ njŽŶŝŶŐŝŶƌĞůĂƟŽŶ hĂŶĚŽŶŝŶŐDĂƉ ǀŝĞǁƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĐŚĂŶŐĞƐ to Future Land ƚŽĞdžŝƐƟŶŐůĂŶĚƵƐĞƐ͘ hƐĞDĂƉ͕ĚĞǀĞůŽƉ ŶĞǁƵƐĞĐĂƚĞŐŽ- ƌŝĞƐ;ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞ ǁŝƚŚϮ͘ϯΘϮ͘ϳͿ NAVIGATING FARMINGTON’S FUTURE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | A - V ĐƟŽŶĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ ĐƟŽŶ >ĞĂĚŐĞŶĐLJ /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ Measurement 3.2 ŽŶĚƵĐƚĂŶŶĞdžĂƟŽŶ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ WƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƐƚƵĚLJ ĚŽƉƚŶŶĞdžĂƟŽŶ^ƚƵĚLJ ƐƚƵĚŝĞƐŽŶĂƌĞŐƵůĂƌ tŽƌŬƐʹWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ ƚŚĂƚĂŶĂůLJƐĞƐƉŽ- ďĂƐŝƐƚŽĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞĂŶĚ ƚĞŶƟĂůĂŶŶĞdžĂƟŽŶ ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌƉŽƚĞŶƟĂů ĂƌĞĂƐ ĂŶŶĞdžĂƟŽŶƐ͘ǀĂůƵĂƚĞ ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐŽĨĂƌĞĂƐĐŽŶ- ƐŝĚĞƌĞĚĨŽƌĂŶŶĞdžĂƟŽŶ ŽŶƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĂŶĚĨƵƚƵƌĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞůĞǀ- ĞůƐ͕ƚŚĞĮƐĐĂůŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ ŽĨƚŚĞĂŶŶĞdžĂƟŽŶ͕ĂŶĚ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶĐLJǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ ŝƚLJ͛ƐsŝƐŝŽŶĂŶĚ&Ƶ- ƚƵƌĞ>ĂŶĚhƐĞDĂƉ͘ 3.3 ƐƐƵƌĞnjŽŶŝŶŐƌĞŐƵůĂ- ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ŶĂůLJnjĞĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ ĚŽƉƚƌĞǀŝƐŝŽŶƐƚŽƚŚĞ ƟŽŶƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂǀĂƌŝĞƚLJ tŽƌŬƐʹWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ njŽŶŝŶŐŝŶƌĞůĂƟŽŶ hĂŶĚŽŶŝŶŐDĂƉ ŽĨůĂŶĚƵƐĞƚLJƉĞƐŝŶ to Future Land ƐƵŝƚĂďůĞůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕ hƐĞDĂƉ͕ĚĞǀĞůŽƉ ĚĞŶƐŝƟĞƐ͕ĂŶĚƉĂƩĞƌŶƐ ŶĞǁƵƐĞĐĂƚĞŐŽ- ǁŚŝůĞĂǀŽŝĚŝŶŐŵŝdžŝŶŐ ƌŝĞƐ;ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞ ŝŶĐŽŵƉĂƟďůĞƵƐĞƐŶĞĂƌ ǁŝƚŚϮ͘ϯΘϮ͘ϳͿ ĞĂĐŚŽƚŚĞƌ͘ 3.4 ŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞďƵīĞƌŝŶŐŽĨ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ŶĂůLJnjĞĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ ĚŽƉƚƌĞǀŝƐŝŽŶƐƚŽƚŚĞ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƟŽŶŝŶŐůĂŶĚƵƐĞ tŽƌŬƐʹWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ njŽŶŝŶŐŝŶƌĞůĂƟŽŶ hĂŶĚŽŶŝŶŐDĂƉ͘ ŝŶƚĞŶƐŝƟĞƐ͕ƉĂƌƟĐƵůĂƌůLJ to Future Land ďĞƚǁĞĞŶƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů hƐĞDĂƉ͕ĚĞǀĞůŽƉ ĂŶĚĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůƵƐĞƐ͘ ŶĞǁƵƐĞĐĂƚĞŐŽ- ƌŝĞƐ;ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞ ǁŝƚŚϮ͘ϯΘϮ͘ϳͿ 3.5 tŽƌŬǁŝƚŚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ /ĚĞŶƟĨLJĂŶĚŵĂƉ hƉĚĂƚĞŽŶŝŶŐDĂƉ ŽǁŶĞƌƐƚŽƌĞnjŽŶĞĂƌĞĂƐ tŽƌŬƐʹŝƚLJ ƐƵŝƚĂďůĞĂƌĞĂƐ ŽĨƐƵŝƚĂďůĞƵŶĚĞǀĞů- DĂŶĂŐĞƌ͛ƐKĸĐĞ ŽƉĞĚůĂŶĚǁŝƚŚĞdžŝƐƚ- ŝŶŐŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚŽ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ ĨŽƌŝŶĮůůĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ 3.21 ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂĚŽƉƟŶŐƚŚĞ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ƌĂŌŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞ KƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞĂĚŽƉƚĞĚďLJ ŝŶƚĞƌŶĂƟŽŶĂůƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ tŽƌŬƐʹƵŝůĚ- Council maintenance code to ŝŶŐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶĂŶĚ ;ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞǁŝƚŚ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ Legal ϭ͘ϴͿ ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŽƉƌŽĂĐƟǀĞ- ůLJĚĞĂůǁŝƚŚŶŽŶĐŽŵ- ƉůŝĂŶĐĞ;ďĞĨŽƌĞďƵŝůĚ- ŝŶŐƐĂƌĞĚŝůĂƉŝĚĂƚĞĚ ĂŶĚĂďĂŶĚŽŶĞĚͿ͘ A - VI | NAVIGATING FARMINGTON’S FUTURE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ĐƟŽŶĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ ĐƟŽŶ >ĞĂĚŐĞŶĐLJ /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ Measurement WůĂŶͬ^ƚƵĚLJ ϯ͘ϲ ƌĞĂƚĞĂŶŝŶĐĞŶƟǀĞ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ WƌĞƉĂƌĞĂƐƚƵĚLJ ĚŽƉƟŽŶďLJŽƵŶĐŝůŽĨ ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐůŽǁĞƌ tŽƌŬƐʹŽŶƐƵů- ƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐƉŽƐƐŝďůĞ ĂŶŝŶĐĞŶƟǀĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ ƉĞƌŵŝƚ͕ĐŽŶŶĞĐƟŽŶ tant ŝŶĐĞŶƟǀĞƐ͘ ĨĞĞƐ͕ŽƌƌĞůĂdžĂƟŽŶŽĨ ƌĞŐƵůĂƟŽŶƐ͕ƚŚĂƚŝŶĐĞŶ- ƟǀŝnjĞƐŝŶĮůůĚĞǀĞůŽƉ- ŵĞŶƚŽŶǀĂĐĂŶƚůŽƚƐ ǁŝƚŚĞdžŝƐƟŶŐŝŶĨƌĂ- ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ĂŶĚƌĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨ ƉĂƌĐĞůƐƚŚĂƚĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJ ŚĂǀĞŝŶĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞŽƌ ƵŶĚĞƐŝƌĂďůĞƵƐĞƐ͘ 3.12 ĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶĚĂĚŽƉƚ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ĞǀĞůŽƉĂƌĞǀŝ- ĚŽƉƚƚŚĞWůĂŶ ĂƌĞǀŝƚĂůŝnjĂƟŽŶƉůĂŶ tŽƌŬƐʹWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ ƚĂůŝnjĂƟŽŶƉůĂŶŝŶ- ĨŽƌƚŚĞDZŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ ŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĐůƵĚŝŶŐŵĂƉƐĂŶĚ ƚŚĂƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĂĚĚŝ- ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ ƟŽŶĂůƌĞŐƵůĂƟŽŶƐĂŶĚ ĨŽƌƚŚĞDZ ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƉĞƌƚĂŝŶŝŶŐ ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ ƚŽďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐĞƚďĂĐŬƐ͕ ŽƌŝĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ ŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ͕ƐŝŐŶĂŐĞ͕ ƵƐĞ͕ŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞ͕ůĂŶĚ- ƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ͘ ŶƐƵƌĞƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂ- ƟŽŶƐĂƌĞƌĞŇĞĐƚĞĚŝŶ ŽǁŶƚŽǁŶDZWůĂŶ ĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚ;ƐͿ͘ 3.13 ƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĂŶĂƌĐŚĂĞŽ- ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ Collect data, Create a map ůŽŐŝĐĂů͕ŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂů͕ĂŶĚ tŽƌŬƐʹWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ ǁŽƌŬŝŶŐǁŝƚŚ ĐƵůƚƵƌĂůƐŝƚĞŵĂŶĂŐĞ- ŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ ^,WKĂŶĚEĂƟǀĞ ŵĞŶƚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ͕ǁŚŝĐŚ ŵĞƌŝĐĂŶƚƌŝďĞƐ͕ ŝŶǀĞŶƚŽƌŝĞƐƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ ŽƚŚĞƌŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂů ƐŝƚĞƐďĞĨŽƌĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉ- ĞdžƉĞƌƚƐ͘ ŵĞŶƚŽĐĐƵƌƐ͘ WƌŽŐƌĂŵͬZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ 3.14 ƐƐĞƐƐƚŚĞĨĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚLJ ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐĞǀĞů- ŽŶĚƵĐƚĂƐƚƵĚLJ WƌĞƐĞŶƚƚŽDZĂŶĚ ŽĨƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƟŶŐŝŶƚŚĞ opment ŽƵƚůŝŶŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌŽƐ ŽƵŶĐŝůĨŽƌĚŝƌĞĐƟŽŶ͘ ĞƌƟĮĞĚ>ŽĐĂů'Žǀ- ĂŶĚĐŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞ ernment Program to CLG program. ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚĞĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ ĂŶĚŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶŽĨ ƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƟŽŶĞīŽƌƚƐ͘ 3.23 ĞǀĞůŽƉ'/^ŵĂƉƐ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ /ĚĞŶƟĨLJŝŶƚĞƌĨĂĐĞ WƌŽĚƵĐĞĂŶĚƉƵďůŝƐŚ ŝĚĞŶƟĨLJŝŶŐǁŝůĚůĂŶĚͬ tŽƌŬƐʹWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ ĂƌĞĂƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ ŝŶƚĞƌĨĂĐĞŵĂƉ ƵƌďĂŶŝŶƚĞƌĨĂĐĞĂƌĞĂƐ ŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂĞƌŝĂůƐƵƌǀĞLJĂŶĚ ǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJďŽƵŶĚ- ĮĞůĚǁŽƌŬ͘ ĂƌŝĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚĞĚ ŐƌŽǁƚŚĂƌĞĂ͘ NAVIGATING FARMINGTON’S FUTURE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | A - VII ĐƟŽŶĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ ĐƟŽŶ >ĞĂĚŐĞŶĐLJ /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ Measurement 3.4 tŽƌŬƚŽĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĂ ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐĞǀĞů- WƌŽĚƵĐĞĂƐƚƵĚLJ ZĞĐĞŝǀĞŽƵŶĐŝůƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ d/ƚŽƉƌŽŵŽƚĞĞdžƉĞ- opment ŽƵƚůŝŶŝŶŐƚŚĞ ƌŝĞŶƟĂůƌĞƚĂŝůĂŶĚĚŝŶ- ďĞŶĞĮƚƐŽĨĂd/ ŝŶŐĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞ program ŶŝŵĂƐZŝǀĞƌ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ŝŶƚĞƌĐŽŶŶĞĐƟǀŝƚLJŽĨ ƚƌĂŝůƐĂŶĚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ͘ 'ŽĂůϰ͘ŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞĂǀŝƚĂůĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĐĞŶƚĞƌŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƟŶŐĂŵŝdž ŽĨƵƐĞƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƌĞƚĂŝů͕ĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚ͕ůŝŐŚƚŵĂŶƵĨĂĐƚƵƌŝŶŐ͕ŚĞĂůƚŚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ƌĞĐƌĞĂƟŽŶ͕ĐƵůƚƵƌĂů͕ĂŶĚŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͘ ĐƟŽŶĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ ĐƟŽŶ >ĞĂĚŐĞŶĐLJ /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ Measurement ĂƉŝƚĂůWƌŽũĞĐƚ 4.3 WůĂŶĨŽƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉ- PRCA /ĚĞŶƟĨLJƉŽƐƐŝďůĞ ZĞĐĞŝǀĞĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůĨƌŽŵ ŵĞŶƚŽĨƉĂƌŬƐ ůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐĨŽƌĨƵƚƵƌĞ Council and place on CIP. ĂŶĚŐƌĞĞŶƐƉĂĐĞ ƉĂƌŬĂŶĚŐƌĞĞŶƐ- ƚŚĂƚĐŽŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƐ ƉĂĐĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ ĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐĚĞǀĞůŽƉ- /ĚĞŶƟĨLJĐŽƐƚƐ͘ ŵĞŶƚĞīŽƌƚƐ͘ A - VIII | NAVIGATING FARMINGTON’S FUTURE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 'ŽĂůϱ͘DŽďŝůŝƚLJ͗&ĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞ͕ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ͕ĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶƐĂĨĞ͕ĂĐƟǀĞ͕ĂŶĚ ĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶŽƉƟŽŶƐĨŽƌƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐĂŶĚǀŝƐŝƚŽƌƐƚŽĞŶũŽLJĂůůƚŚĂƚ &ĂƌŵŝŶŐƚŽŶĂŶĚƚŚĞƌĞŐŝŽŶŚĂǀĞƚŽŽīĞƌ͘ ĐƟŽŶĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ ĐƟŽŶ >ĞĂĚŐĞŶĐLJ /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ Measurement ZĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌLJZĞĨŽƌŵ 5.2 ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ŽŶĚƵĐƚĂĚĞǀĞů- ŽƵŶĐŝůĂĚŽƉƚƐĂĚĞǀĞůŽƉ- ĂƌŽĂĚǁĂLJŝŵƉĂĐƚĨĞĞ tŽƌŬƐʹŽŶ- opment impact ŵĞŶƚŝŵƉĂĐƚĨĞĞƐƚƵĚLJ ĨŽƌŶĞǁĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ƐƵůƚĂŶƚ ƐƚƵĚLJƚŽŝĚĞŶƟĨLJ ƚŽƉĂLJĨŽƌŽīͲƐŝƚĞ ĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞĨĞĞƐ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐĂŶĚƵƉ- ĨŽƌŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ŬĞĞƉƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚďLJŶĞǁ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ 5.7 ZĞǀŝƐĞƚŚĞŽŶŝŶŐKƌĚŝ- ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ZĞǀŝĞǁĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ Adopt UDC update ŶĂŶĐĞͬ^ƵďĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶZĞŐ- tŽƌŬƐʹWůĂŶ- ƌĞŐƵůĂƟŽŶƐĂŶĚ ƵůĂƟŽŶƐŝŶƚŚĞhŶŝĮĞĚ ŶŝŶŐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ ƌĞǀŝƐĞĂƐŶĞĐĞƐ- ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĚĞ ƐĂƌLJ ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĐŽĚĞƐƚŽ ĞŶƐƵƌĞůĂŶĚƵƐĞƐĂůŽŶŐ ƚŚŽƌŽƵŐŚĨĂƌĞƐŵĞĞƚ ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŽĨĚƌŝǀĞǁĂLJ ĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞƐĂŶĚĞdžŝƚƐ͕ ƐĐŚŽŽůnjŽŶĞƐ͕ŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚ- ŝŶŐƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͕ďƵīĞƌŝŶŐ͕ ĂŶĚƐĞƚďĂĐŬ͘ WƌŽŐƌĂŵͬZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ 5.5 /ĚĞŶƟĨLJĂŶĚŝŵƉůĞ- &DWK ŶƚĞƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚŽŶ WƵďůŝƐŚƐƚƵĚLJ͘/ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚ ŵĞŶƚǁĂLJƐƚŽŝŶĐůƵĚĞ d/WWůŝƐƚ͘ ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƟŽŶƐ͘ ƌŝĚĞͲƐŚĂƌĞ;hďĞƌ͕>LJŌ͕ ĞƚĐ͘ͿĂŶĚŵŝĐƌŽŵŽďŝůŝ- ĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ ƚLJͲƐŚĂƌĞ;ďŝŬĞƐ͕ƐĐŽŽƚ- ĨŽƌƐƚƵĚLJ;ƌĞŐŝŽŶ- ĞƌƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘ͿƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐƚŽ ĂůƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐͿ͘ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐǁŝƚŚ ŽŶĚƵĐƚƐƚƵĚLJ͘ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂůƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂ- ƟŽŶŽƉƟŽŶƐ͘ 5.8 tŽƌŬǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ&DWK &DWK ƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĂƚĂƐŬ /ĚĞŶƟĨLJƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂŶĚƉůĂĐĞ ƚŽĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĂďŝŬĞǁĂLJ ĨŽƌĐĞ͕ƌĞŐƵůĂƌ on TIP. ƚĂƐŬĨŽƌĐĞŽĨƵƐĞƌƐƚŽ ŵĞĞƟŶŐƐ͘ ĨƵƌƚŚĞƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶĚ ŵŽŶŝƚŽƌƚŚĞŝŬĞǁĂLJ WůĂŶƚŚĂƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĂ ƌĞǀŝĞǁŽĨĂůƚĞƌŶĂƟǀĞ ĨƵŶĚƐĨŽƌĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶ and maintenance. NAVIGATING FARMINGTON’S FUTURE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | A - IX 5.13 tŽƌŬǁŝƚŚůŽĐĂůŽƵƚ- ORII /ĚĞŶƟĨLJƐŚƵƩůĞ ZĞƉŽƌƚƚŽŽƵŶĐŝůĨŽƌĚŝƌĞĐ- ĚŽŽƌƌĞĐƌĞĂƟŽŶŽƵƞŝƚ- ƌŽƵƚĞƐ͕ŵĂƉ ƟŽŶ ƚĞƌƐĂŶĚ^:;ĞƋƵŝƉ- ƌŽƵƚĞƐ͘ĞƚĞƌ- ŵĞŶƚƌĞŶƚĂůƉƌŽŐƌĂŵͿ ŵŝŶĞĨĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚLJ ƚŽĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚͬƉƌŽŵŽƚĞ ŽĨŝƚLJƐŚƵƩůĞ ƌĞĐƌĞĂƟŽŶƐŚƵƩůĞƐĨŽƌ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ͘ ƌĂŌŝŶŐĂŶĚŵŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ ďŝŬŝŶŐ͘/ŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƚĞ ƌĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌLJŶĞĞĚƐĨŽƌ ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĞƐͬƉŝĐŬƵƉůŽĐĂ- ƟŽŶƐĂƐĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞ͘ WůĂŶͬ^ƚƵĚLJ 5.11 ŽŶĚƵĐƚĂƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ŽŶĚƵĐƚƐƚƵĚLJ͕ WůĂĐĞƉƌŝŽƌŝƟĞƐŽŶ/W ŶĞĞĚƐĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ tŽƌŬƐʹdƌĂĸĐ͕ ƐĞƚƉƌŝŽƌŝƟĞƐ͕ ĨŽƌ^ĂĨĞZŽƵƚĞƐƚŽ Engineering, ĞƐƟŵĂƚĞĐŽƐƚƐ ^ĐŚŽŽůĂŶĚƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ WůĂŶŶŝŶŐŝǀŝ- ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚĂŶĚ ƐŝŽŶƐ ĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůĂƌĞĂƐƚŚĂƚ ŝĚĞŶƟĮĞƐŶĞĞĚĞĚƐŝĚĞ- ǁĂůŬĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶĂŶĚ repair. 'ŽĂůϲ͘WůĂLJŐƌŽƵŶĚ͗WƌŽǀŝĚĞLJĞĂƌͲƌŽƵŶĚ͕ƐĂĨĞ͕ĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞ͕ĂŶĚƋƵĂůŝƚLJĨĂĐŝůŝ- ƟĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚƚŽĞŶŚĂŶĐŝŶŐƚŚĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƟŽŶĂůŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐĨŽƌ ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐĂŶĚǀŝƐŝƚŽƌƐŽĨĂůůĂŐĞƐĂŶĚĂďŝůŝƟĞƐ͘ ĐƟŽŶĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ ĐƟŽŶ >ĞĂĚŐĞŶĐLJ /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ Measurement ZĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌLJZĞĨŽƌŵ ϲ͘ϰ ZĞǀŝĞǁĐŽĚĞ PRCA Conduct an impact ĚŽƉƚĂĨĞĞƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐĨŽƌ ĨĞĞƐƚƵĚLJ ƉĂƌŬĚĞĚŝĐĂƟŽŶ ;ĂŶƚŚŝƐďĞĐŽŵďŝŶĞĚ ĂŶĚͬŽƌĨĞĞŝŶůŝĞƵ ǁŝƚŚϱ͘Ϯ͕ƌŽĂĚǁĂLJΘϱ͘ϭϭ͕ ĂŶĚĞdžƉůŽƌĞŽƚŚĞƌ ƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐ͍Ϳ ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝ- ƟĞƐƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚĞ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂŶĚ ŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŽĨ ƉĂƌŬƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĮĐĂůůLJ ďLJĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌƐ͘ 6.5 ŵĞŶĚƚŚĞ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJtŽƌŬƐ ZĞǀŝƐĞh ĚŽƉƚĞĚďLJŽƵŶĐŝů hŶŝĨŽƌŵĞǀĞůŽƉ ʹWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ ŽĚĞƚŽƌĞƋƵŝƌĞ ŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƟŽŶŽĨ ƐŚĂĚĞ͕ĞŝƚŚĞƌŶĂƚƵ- ƌĂůŽƌĂƌƟĮĐŝĂů͕ŝŶƚŽ ĂůůƌĞĐƌĞĂƟŽŶĂů ĂƌĞĂƐ͘ A - X | NAVIGATING FARMINGTON’S FUTURE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WůĂŶͬ^ƚƵĚLJ ϲ͘ϭ Support and PRCA ^ĞƚƟŵĞůŝŶĞĨŽƌ ĚŽƉƚĞĚďLJŽƵŶĐŝů͘ ƵƉĚĂƚĞƚŚĞϮϬϭϰ ƉůĂŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ WĂƌŬƐ͕ZĞĐƌĞĂƟŽŶ ƌĂŌWůĂŶ͘ŽŶ- and Cultural ĚƵĐƚƉƵďůŝĐŽƵƚ- īĂŝƌƐDĂƐƚĞƌ ƌĞĂĐŚ͘ WůĂŶ;ƚŽĂůŝŐŶǁŝƚŚ ŽƚŚĞƌĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ WůĂŶƐͿ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ŝĚĞŶƟĨLJŝŶŐ ƉƌŝŽƌŝƟĞƐĂŶĚ ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ ĨŽƌŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ ĂŶĚƵƉŐƌĂĚĞƐ͘ ϲ͘ϮϮ ƐƐĞƐƐƚŚĞĨĞĂƐŝďŝů- PRCA ŽŶĚƵĐƚĂĐŽƐƚ WŽůŝĐLJĂĚŽƉƚĞĚďLJŽƵŶĐŝů ŝƚLJŽĨƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐ ĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐƐƚƵĚLJ ŽƵƚĚŽŽƌƌĞĐƌĞĂƟŽŶ ĂŶĚƉĂƌŬƐ͛ĨĞĞƌĞ- ĚƵĐƟŽŶƐĨŽƌůŽĐĂůƐ͘ 'ŽĂůϳ͘^ŽĐŝĂůŶƌŝĐŚŵĞŶƚ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞĞǀĞŶƚƐĂŶĚƐƉĂĐĞƐƚŚĂƚĐƌĞĂƚĞĂĨƵŶ͕ŝŶ- ĐůƵƐŝǀĞ͕ĂŶĚƐƵƉƉŽƌƟǀĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĨŽƌŽƵƌĚŝǀĞƌƐĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJƚŽƐŽĐŝĂů- ŝnjĞŝŶĂŶĚďĞŶĞĮƚĨƌŽŵĐƵůƚƵƌĂůĞŶƌŝĐŚŵĞŶƚŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ͘ ĐƟŽŶĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ ĐƟŽŶ >ĞĂĚŐĞŶĐLJ /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ Measurement ^ƉĞĐŝĂů/ŶŝƟĂƟǀĞ 7.7 /ĚĞŶƟĨLJƐƵƐƚĂŝŶ- ŝƚLJDĂŶĂŐĞƌ͛Ɛ ĞǀĞůŽƉĂƐƵƐƚĂŝŶ- &ƵůůLJĨƵŶĚĞĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ ĂďůĞĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ KĸĐĞ ĂďůĞĨƵŶĚŝŶŐƉůĂŶ ŵĞĐŚĂŶŝƐŵƐƚŽ ŝŶƌĞƐƉŽŶƐĞƚŽ ƉƌŽƚĞĐƚĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ ďƵĚŐĞƚƐŚŽƌƞĂůůƐ ĐƵůƚƵƌĂůĂƐƐĞƚƐ ĐĂƵƐĞĚďLJƵŶĞdž- ƐƵĐŚĂƐƚŚĞ&Ăƌŵ- ƉĞĐƚĞĚĞǀĞŶƚƐ͘ ŝŶŐƚŽŶDƵƐĞƵŵ͕ >ŝďƌĂƌLJĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌ ĐŝǀŝĐĨĂĐŝůŝƟĞƐ͘ NAVIGATING FARMINGTON’S FUTURE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | A - XI 'ŽĂůϴ͘WƵďůŝĐƐƐĞƚƐ͗ƐƐƵƌĞƚŚĞƉƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŽĨƉƵďůŝĐ ƵƟůŝƟĞƐ͕ĨĂĐŝůŝƟĞƐ͕ĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ŝŶĂƚƌĂŶƐƉĂƌĞŶƚĂŶĚƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞǁĂLJƚŚĂƚ ŵĂŬĞƐƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐƉƌŽƵĚƚŽůŝǀĞ͕ǁŽƌŬĂŶĚƉůĂLJŝŶ&ĂƌŵŝŶŐƚŽŶ͘ ĐƟŽŶĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ ĐƟŽŶ >ĞĂĚŐĞŶĐLJ /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ Measurement ^ƉĞĐŝĂů/ŶŝƟĂƟǀĞ 8.2 ŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚ Farmington Police ,ŽƐƚƐƚĂƟƐƟĐƐŽŶ ^ŚŝŌĞĚƉƵďůŝĐƉĞƌĐĞƉƟŽŶƐ ƉƵďůŝĐůLJĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞ Department ǁĞďƐŝƚĞ ĂŶĚĞĂƐŝůLJĨŽƵŶĚ ĐƌŝŵĞͬƐĂĨĞƚLJƐƚĂ- ƟƐƟĐƐ;Ğ͘Ő͘'ŽŽŐůĞ ƐĞĂƌĐŚͿƌĞŇĞĐƚ Farmington proper ĐŽŶƚĞdžƚ;ĂƐŽƉ- ƉŽƐĞĚƚŽD^ͿĂŶĚ ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐƉƵďůŝĐƉĞƌ- ĐĞƉƟŽŶŽĨĐƌŝŵĞ ĂŶĚƐĂĨĞƚLJ͘ 8.3 ĞǀĞůŽƉĂƉƵďůŝĐ WƵďůŝĐīĂŝƌƐ ĞǀĞůŽƉĂŵƵůƟͲ ^ŚŝŌĞĚƉƵďůŝĐƉĞƌĐĞƉƟŽŶƐ ƌĞůĂƟŽŶƐĐĂŵƉĂŝŐŶ ŵĞĚŝĂŵĞƐƐĂŐĞ ƚŚĂƚŚŝŐŚůŝŐŚƚƐ ďƌĂŶĚŝŶŐ&ĂƌŵŝŶŐ- &ĂƌŵŝŶŐƚŽŶĂƐĂ ƚŽŶĂƐĂƐĂĨĞƉůĂĐĞ ƐĂĨĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJʹ ƚŽďĞ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚĞƐƟŵŽŶŝ- ĂůƐ;ƐŽůŝĐŝƚĞĚͿǀŝĚĞŽ ĂŶĚŐŝǀĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůĂƚ- ƚĞŶƟŽŶƚŽĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ ĂŶĚƉƌŽƐƉĞĐƟǀĞ ƌĞƟƌĞĞƐ͘ ZĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌLJZĞĨŽƌŵ 8.7 /ĚĞŶƟĨLJĂƌĞĂƐĨŽƌ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJtŽƌŬƐ ƌĞĂƚĞĂŵĂƉŚŝŐŚ- WƵďůŝƐŚŵĂƉ͕ĞŶŐĂŐĞǁŝƚŚ ůĞŐĂůŝnjĞĚŵĂƌŝũƵĂ- ʹWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ ůŝŐŚƟŶŐĂƌĞĂƐĂƉ- ƉŽƐƐŝďůĞƌĞƚĂŝůĞƌƐƚŽĚŝƌĞĐƚ ŶĂƐĂůĞƐʹĂŵĞŶĚ ƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞĨŽƌƌĞƚĂŝů ůŽĐĂƟŽŶƚŽĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚĞĚ ƚŚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞůĂŶĚƵƐĞ ŵĂƌŝũƵĂŶĂƐĂůĞƐ͘ ĂƌĞĂƐ͘ ŵĂƉƚŽůŽĐĂƚĞƚŚŝƐ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞǁŝƚŚ ƚLJƉĞŽĨďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐ 'ŽĂůƐϯ͘ϱΘϯ͘ϲ ŽƵƚƐŝĚĞƚŚĞĚŽǁŶ- ƚŽǁŶĂƌĞĂ͘ A - XII | NAVIGATING FARMINGTON’S FUTURE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 'ŽĂůϵ͘EĂƚƵƌĂůƐƐĞƚƐ͗dŚƌŽƵŐŚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůůLJƐĞŶƐŝƟǀĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕ĞŶŚĂŶĐĞƚŚĞŶĂƚƵƌĂůĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐŽĐŝĂů͕ŵĞŶƚĂů͕ ĂŶĚĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐďĞŶĞĮƚƐŽĨƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ ĐƟŽŶĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ ĐƟŽŶ >ĞĂĚŐĞŶĐLJ /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ Measurement ZĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌLJZĞĨŽƌŵ 9.1 ĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶĂĐ- ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJtŽƌŬƐ tŽƌŬŝŶŐǁŝƚŚ WƵďůŝƐŚDĂƉ͘/ŶƚĞŐƌĂƚĞ ĐĞƐƐĐŽŶƚƌŽůƉůĂŶ - Planning, Engi- ƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ͕ ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĂďŽƵƚĂĐĐĞƐƐ ĨŽƌŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞ ŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͕dƌĂĸĐ ŝĚĞŶƟĨLJĂĐĐĞƐƐ ĐŽŶƚƌŽůƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚĂůů ĂŶĚǁŝůĚĞƌŶĞƐƐ ŝǀŝƐŝŽŶƐ ĐŽŶƚƌŽůƉŽŝŶƚƐƚŽ ƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚĂŐĞŶĐŝĞƐ͘ ĂƌĞĂƐƚŽŵŝŶŝŵŝnjĞ ƉƵďůŝĐůĂŶĚƐ͘ ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽǁŝůĚůŝĨĞ͕ ǀĞŐĞƚĂƟŽŶ͕ĂŶĚ Create a map. ĐƵůƚƵƌĂůƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͘ 9.9 ZĞǀŝĞǁĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ Farmington Police ŽůůĂƚĞĂůůƌĞĨ- Adopt amended ordinance ŶŽŝƐĞŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐ ĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚʹ ĞƌĞŶĐĞƐŝŶƚŚĞ ĂŶĚĞŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚƉŽůŝĐLJ͘ ĂŶĚĂĚŽƉƚƐƚĂŶ- ŽĚĞŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚ DƵŶŝĐŝƉĂůŽĚĞ ĚĂƌĚƐƚŽŵŝƟŐĂƚĞ ƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐŶŽŝƐĞ͘ ŶŽŝƐĞƉŽůůƵƟŽŶ͕ ŵĞŶĚĨŽƌĐŽŶƐŝƐ- ǁŚŝĐŚĂĚǀĞƌƐĞůLJ ƚĞŶĐLJĂŶĚĐůĂƌŝƚLJ͘ ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŚĞƋƵĂůŝƚLJ ŽĨůŝĨĞĂŶĚŚĞĂůƚŚ ŽĨ&ĂƌŵŝŶŐƚŽŶ͛Ɛ ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͕ǀŝƐŝƚŽƌƐ͕ ĂŶĚǁŝůĚůŝĨĞ͘ 'ŽĂůϭϬ͘Z^/>/Ez;,ĞĂůƚŚLJΘ^ƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJͿ͗ĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶĚ ƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚĞŶƐŽĐŝĂůĂƐƐĞƚƐƚŽďƵŝůĚƌĞƐŝůŝĞŶĐĞĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĂŚĞĂůƚŚLJĂŶĚ ƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ ĐƟŽŶĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ ĐƟŽŶ >ĞĂĚŐĞŶĐLJ /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ Measurement Program/ ZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ 10.1 /ŵƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞĚĂƚĂ PRCA Conduct a de- ĚŽƉƚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐ ƋƵĂŶƟƚLJ͕ƋƵĂůŝƚLJ͕ ŵŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐƐƚƵĚLJ ĞƋƵŝƚLJ͘ ĂŶĚĚŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJǁŝƚŚ ŝĚĞŶƟĨLJŝŶŐƚŚĞ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŝŶƉƵƚ ƵŶĚĞƌͲƐĞƌǀĞĚĂŶĚ ƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞĂďĞƩĞƌ ǀƵůŶĞƌĂďůĞŝŶŽƵƌ ƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟŽŶĂŶĚ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ ƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐŽĨ ǀƵůŶĞƌĂďůĞŐƌŽƵƉƐ͘ NAVIGATING FARMINGTON’S FUTURE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | A - XIII  Memo To: Farmington Planning & Zoning Commission From: Beth Escobar, Planning Manager Date: August 26, 2021 Subject: Revisions to the Unified Development Code regarding Cannabis Background Staff first presented proposed changes to the UDC in response to the recent legalization of recreational marijuana at the August 12, 2021 Commission meeting. Use Table Staff is recommending retail sales of marijuana be permitted in GC: General Commercial zoning districts only. (Section 2.4.41) The General Commercial District is defined as: Sec. 3.13 - General commercial (GC). 3.13.1 Purpose. The general commercial (GC) district is intended to accommodate commercial uses. The GC district is not a neighborhood-oriented district and is not generally appropriate for application within residential areas. It is intended to be used to accommodate existing commercial uses along thoroughfares. It may also be used to accommodate new development proposals. In all cases, new development in the GC district should be adequately served by infrastructure. The GC district is intended to implement the planning policies of the comprehensive plan's "Commercial" land use designation. 3.13.2 Allowed uses. Uses are allowed in the GC district in accordance with the use table of section 2.3. 3.13.3 Density and dimensional standards. All development in the GC district is subject to the density and dimensional standards of section 2.8. 3.13.4 District standards. District standards applicable in the GC district include the following: A. Utilize architectural styles and building materials for all structures that are commonly used in the surrounding neighborhood. The architectural style and materials used for all structures shall be complementary to that of other structures in the area or vicinity.  B. Exhibit a unity of design for buildings within multi-building complexes through the use of similar elements such as rooflines, materials, window arrangement, sign location, and details. Staff has been contacted regarding retail marijuana sales in the Central Business District. 3.14.1 Purpose. The central business (CB) district is primarily intended to accommodate the moderate to high intensity business activities that characterize the city's cultural and business center. The CB district is appropriate for application in the downtown neighborhood as described in the comprehensive plan. The CB district is intended to implement the planning policies of the Comprehensive Plan's "Commercial" land use categories, as further qualified by Chapter 13, downtown neighborhoods. The vision for the downtown area, per the 2019 MRA plan, is as a destination place for residents and tourists alike with an emphasis on retail sales, activities and events and recreation. The recent large investment in the outdoor streetscape by the City reflects and supports this vision. Allowing cannabis sales in the Central Business area appears to be in conflict with this family and tourist friendly vision. Production and Manufacturing The extraction of cannabis and cannabidiol oil from plants involves the use of various solvents, including ethanol, carbon dioxide, propane and butane. Because of the flammable nature of these products, staff is recommending production be allowed within the GC and Industrial Zoning Districts with a Special Use Permit. (Section 2.4.42) Home Occupation Per the new state law, residents may grow up to a maximum of 12 cannabis plants at their homes. In order to reinforce that these plants are only to be used for personal consumption, staff is recommending language be added to Section 2.5.9 Agriculture Agriculture is permitted in the RA (Rural Agriculture) District only. Staff is suggesting that language prohibiting the cultivation of cannabis as an agricultural use in the RA district. (Sections 2.3 & 3.2.5) be prohibited. Food Trucks Staff is also recommending adding language prohibiting the sale of cannabis products from mobile food trucks (Section 2.4.66). With these recommended revisions, staff is hoping to balance support for this new economic segment while protecting public health and safety. Council Input The code changes noted above have been presented to Council and received consensus. A list of the recommended red line changes is included with this report. Action At the August 12 meeting, the Commission asked for more time to review the proposed revisions. Staff is hoping that the changes are ready to forward to Council.