Muyni
← Back to Fort Mill

Historic Review Board

Regular Meeting

Fort Mill, SC · April 10, 2018

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

MINUTES TOWN OF FORT MILL HISTORIC REVIEW BOARD April 10, 2018 Council Chambers – 112 Confederate Street 4:30 PM Present: Jonathan Mauney, Michael Hirsch, Carolyn Blair, Chip Heemsoth, Planning Director Chris Pettit, Assistant Planner Nick Cauthen Absent: Nik Radovanovic Chairman Louis Roman, Melissa White Guests: Steve Tolson, Travis Tolson CALL TO ORDER Acting-Chairman Heemsoth called the meeting to order at 4:38 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Heemsoth made a motion to approve the minutes from the March 13, 2018, meeting as presented. Mr. Mauney seconded the motion. The motion passed with a vote of 4-0. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Certificate of Appropriateness – 204-101 Main Street Planning Director Pettit introduced the request, the purpose of which was to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for a second-story expansion of the existing deck at the rear of the property and a mural along the building’s Confederate Street façade. Planning Director Pettit provided an overview of the staff report and further explained that the property was subject to a pending Bailey Bill request and therefore was subject to additional review criteria. The applicants, Steve and Travis Tolson, provided additional information regarding the proposed mural / paintings along the building’s Confederate Street frontage, which consist of antiqued, white lettering for “BREWERY” and the business’s logo. Mr. Hirsch questioned to what degree the deck drawings were conceptual, to which Steve Tolson explained that the deck had not been fully engineered, which could result in some changes to the location of supports as an example. Members of the Board questioned the degree to which the deck would be visible from Main Street or Confederate Street as seen above the rooflines. Discussion followed, and it was determined that it would be unlikely for any improvements to be visible above the rooflines. Additional discussion occurred related to the differences in the railing design for the second level versus the first level. The applicant noted that they felt as though the difference was an oversight and that the intent was to have the railings match, with code requirements being the only potential reason why they would differ. Hearing no further discussion, Acting-Chairman Heemsoth requested a motion. Ms. Blair made a motion to approve the request as presented with the following notes and conditions: 1. The railings for the proposed second level deck would match the existing deck unless a building code requirement would require a different design; 2. The proposed improvements meet the standards for rehabilitation as required by the Bailey Bill; and, 3. Staff is authorized to approve minor modifications as may be necessary to meet the comments and requirements of the various Town reviewing authorities. Mr. Mauney seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a vote of 4-0. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 4:59 pm. Respectfully submitted, Chris Pettit, AICP Planning Director July 3, 2018

Agenda

AGENDA TOWN OF FORT MILL HISTORIC REVIEW BOARD April 10, 2018 112 Confederate Street 4:30 PM AGENDA CALL TO ORDER APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. HRB Meeting: March 13, 2018 [Page 2-3] OLD BUSINESS 1. Request for Certificate of Appropriateness [Pages 4-13] Applicant Name: Amor Artis Brewing Owner Name: Main Street – Fort Mill LLC Property Address: 204-101 Main Street Purpose: Request to approve a second-story expansion of an existing deck at the rear of the building and a mural along the building’s Confederate Street façade Zoning: LC / Historic ADJOURN 1 MINUTES TOWN OF FORT MILL HISTORIC REVIEW BOARD March 13, 2018 Council Chambers – 112 Confederate Street 4:30 PM Present: Nik Radovanovic, Michael Hirsch, Carolyn Blair, Chip Heemsoth, Planning Director Chris Pettit, Assistant Planner Nick Cauthen Absent: Chairman Louis Roman, Jonathan Mauney, Melissa White Guests: Sherry Strohl, Dan Mummey, Lauren Cline CALL TO ORDER Acting-Chairman Radovanovic called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Heemsoth made a motion to approve the minutes from the February 13, 2018, meeting as presented. Ms. Blair seconded the motion. The motion passed with a vote of 4-0. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Certificate of Appropriateness – 124 Main Street Planning Director Pettit introduced the request, the purpose of which was to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for a projecting sign at 124 Main Street for the tenant Highgarden Real Estate. The Board was provided with pictures and renderings of the signage. Hearing no questions, Acting-Chairman Radovanovic requested a motion. Ms. Blair made a motion to approve the request as presented. Mr. Heemsoth seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a vote of 4-0. 2. Request for Certificate of Appropriateness – 204-101 Main Street Planning Director Pettit noted that the applicant had requested that the item be deferred until the Board’s April meeting. Mr. Heemsoth made a motion to defer the request to the 2 Board’s April meeting. Mr. Radovanovic seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a vote of 4-0. INFORMATION / DISCUSSION Dan Mummey and Lauren Cline presented the proposed landscape plan for the project located at 312 N. White Street and requested feedback from the Board prior to the official submittal of the plan. Town staff and members of the Board discussed the plan and noted that there were no significant concerns with the plan as presented. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 4:42 pm. Respectfully submitted, Chris Pettit, AICP Planning Director April 4, 2018 3 Historic Review Board Applicant: Amor Artis Brewing 204-101 Main Street Tax Map # 020-03-01-015 Zoning: Local Commercial / Historic District Request: Amor Artis Brewing is requesting approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for a new, second- story addition to the existing deck at the rear of the building as well as a mural along the building’s Confederate Street façade. The applicant has provided a rendering (attached) showing the proposed deck improvements. As shown, the deck addition generally matches the design of the existing deck and matches the proposed screening/enclosures for the exterior cooler and chiller located at the rear of the property. At the time of this report, staff did not have a rendering showing the proposed mural along the building’s Confederate Street façade. Historic District Design Guidelines Review Chapter 6: Design Guidelines for Pedestrian and Site Features for All Projects • 6.1 – Page 112 – Design and locate outdoor amenity space to promote pedestrian activity and complement historic buildings • 6.5 – Page 113 – Locate dining areas to minimize impacts on the streetscape • 6.6 – Page 113 – Design a new handrail and/or barrier to be simple • 6.13 – Page 118 – Minimize the visual impacts of service areas • 6.14 – Page 118 – Minimize the visual impacts of building equipment on the public way and the surrounding neighborhood • 6.15 – Page 119 – New site features should be compatible with the historic character of the property 4 Bailey Bill Review The property, York County Tax Map # 020-03-01-015, is subject to a pending request to receive a special tax assessment for rehabilitated historic properties (Bailey Bill). The property has been approved for Preliminary Certification but has not yet received Final Certification approval. Any substantive changes made to the property during rehabilitation (prior to Final Certification approval), such as those proposed with this request, shall be reviewed and approved based upon the standards for rehabilitation outlined in Chapter 2, Article IV, Division 3, Section 2-202. Any changes not meeting those standards may disqualify the property from eligibility during the Final Certification process. Should the proposed improvements be scheduled for construction after the property has received Final Certification approval, the proposed improvements would still need to be reviewed based upon the standards for rehabilitation outlined in Chapter 2, Article IV, Division 3, Section 2-202. The Historic Review Board shall make a determination as to whether the proposed improvements are consistent with the standards for rehabilitation. If determined to be consistent, the proposed improvements may be approved and constructed without affecting the special tax assessment on the property. If the proposed improvements are determined to be inconsistent, their construction would disqualify the property from its eligibility for the special tax assessment. (a) Standards for rehabilitation. To be eligible for the special tax assessment, historic rehabilitations must be conducted according to the following standards: (1) The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alterations or of features and spaces that characterize each property shall be avoided. (2) Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development shall not be undertaken. (3) Most properties change over time. Those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. (4) Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property should be preserved. (5) Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement or of a distinctive feature, the new should match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical or pictorial evidence. 5 (6) Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the most gentle means possible. (7) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the historic property and its environment. (8) New additions and adjacent new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Staff Recommendation Should the Board wish to approve the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness, staff would request that the approval motion include a condition to allow staff the ability to approve minor modifications to the plan so as to accommodate the comments and concerns of the various plan reviewers for the Town of Fort Mill. Attachments Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness Photograph of the existing deck structure Sketches and rendering of the proposed deck structure 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Get email alerts for Fort Mill

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting