Planning Commission
Regular MeetingFort Mill, SC · January 21, 2020
Minutes
MINUTES
TOWN OF FORT MILL
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
January 21, 2020
112 Confederate Street
6:30 PM
Present: James Traynor, Hynek Lettang, Matthew Lucarelli, Ben Hudgins, and Planning Director
Penelope Karagounis
Absent: Andy Agrawal, Tom Petty and Chris Wolfe
Guests: Mark McAuley, Justin Roark, Mike Goodin, Matt DeWitt, Mark Nosacka, and John
Marks
Chairman Traynor called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm.
Chairman Traynor suggested to continue the election of Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson to the
February Planning Commission meeting due to not having all members present. Staff will place the
Election of Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson on the February Planning Commission agenda.
After discussion and with no further questions or comments the Chairman asked for a motion.
Mr. Lucarelli made a motion to approve the minutes from the December 18, 2019 Planning
Commission meeting. Mr. Hudgins seconded the motion. The minutes were approved by a vote of
4-0.
NEW BUSINESS ITEMS
1. Text Amendment: HC Highway Commercial District
Planning Director Karagounis provided a brief overview of the staff report and draft
ordinance, which would amend Article II, Requirements by District; Section 9, HC Highway
Commercial District; so as to add Religious Institutions as an allowed use in the Highway
Commercial District.
With recent development, staff recognized Religious Institutions, permitted in most
zoning districts, is not currently a permitted use in the Highway Commercial (HC) zoning
district. After no further questions or comments Chairman Traynor asked for a motion.
Mr. Hudgins made a motion to recommend approval of the text amendment. Mr. Lettang
seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a vote of 4-0.
2. Text Amendment: INS Institutional District
Planning Director Karagounis provided a brief overview of the staff report and draft
ordinance, which would amend Article II, Requirements by District; Section 29, INS
Institutional District; to establish requirements for Religious Institutions.
1
Staff previously drafted the Institutional District in July 2019 that initially encompassed
school sites. The Institutional District was written with the intent of expanding other uses
other than schools. Those uses were to include other public or semi-public facilities such
as government uses, utilities, arts/cultures/civic uses, hospitals, daycares, and places of
worship.
The text amendment would amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow Religious Institutions as
an allowed use with the Institutional District, with requirements intended to minimize the
impacts to neighboring properties.
INFORMATION/DISCUSSION
Preliminary Commercial Appearance Review: Fort Mill Hospital
The design team for the hospital came to the Planning Commission to introduce
themselves. The following people were in attendance:
• Mark McAuley from ColeJenest and Stone - Civil Engineer
• Justin Roark from ESa – Architect
• Mike Goodin from Robins and Morton – General Contractor
• Mark Nosacka from Tenet Health – CEO
The design team mentioned how they are in the early stages of the preliminary plan for
the hospital. The location of the site is at the corner of Highway 160 and Highway 21.
They are focusing on the orientation of the building to sit at the highest point of the site.
The proposal is for a 210,000 square foot, three-story hospital and an approximately
80,000 square foot, five-story medical office building. The architect mentioned that they
do not currently have the exterior design of the building, but they would like to use
materials that are complimentary with the community and especially similar design
elements to Kingsley and LPL.
The preliminary site plan of the hospital showed a loop road and it was discussed how
access points/driveways were not finalized because the TIA has not been completed and
SCDOT will determine the finalization of the access points. Chairman Traynor suggested
extending the area for ambulances or other vehicles to be able to make a left turn from
the main loop road to the other street within the hospital campus. Mr. Hudgins brought a
concern about the helipad and advise the design team to inspect regulations to minimize
the impact of surrounding properties (noise, flight pattern clearance, etc.).
Mr. Hudgins commented to the design team to preserve as much existing natural areas of
the site. Mr. McAuley agreed that they would preserve certain natural areas to enhance
the hospital. Mr. Lucarelli mentioned that there could be opportunities to preserve the
existing peach trees on the site as well.
Mr. Traynor asked if all the parking would be surface parking? The answer was yes. The
Commissioners voiced their opinion on the site plan parking by stating that it appeared
there was excess parking for the site. It appears that the exterior parking needs to be
2
reduced and brought in closer to the hospital site. Mr. McAuley mentioned they would
look to reducing some of the excess parking.
Mr. Lettang mentioned how he would like for the hospital to be successful and a be a
cornerstone to this area. He stressed the importance of a quality designed hospital.
Mr. Roark discussed how they are still working on the exterior design of the hospital.
However, he wanted to receive an opinion from the Commissioners on certain materials
that they were looking at using. The materials were some brick, composite metal panel
and EIFS/stucco.
The Commissioners voiced their opposition for EIFS/stucco. Mr. Lucarelli was not
convinced to have EIFS for material of a hospital. This material would not have the quality
or longevity for the hospital. The hospital will be located on a prominent corner and the
building materials need to have good quality.
Mr. Traynor mentioned to the design team that Kingsley was a good reference point for
the type of materials to use. He does not agree for the stucco material to be the
dominant material for the hospital. Mr. Nosacka had some concerns for spending money
on high quality material, when the money could be used to pay doctors or purchase high
quality hospital equipment.
Mr. Traynor explained to the design team that the Commission would like to see exterior
material board/elevations when they formally submit for the Commercial Appearance
Review. Mr. Roark mentioned that they would like to submit for the Commercial
Appearance Review in May. Planning Director Karagounis suggested to the design team
to come back to the Planning Commission in March and April for an informal review of
the site plan, building materials and elevations.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:42 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Penelope G. Karagounis, MA
Planning Director
February 11, 2020
3
Agenda
TOWN OF FORT MILL
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
January 21, 2020
112 Confederate Street
6:30 PM
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ELECTION OF CHAIRPERSON AND VICE-CHAIRPERSON
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Regular Meeting: December 17, 2019 [Pages 2-5]
NEW BUSINESS ITEMS
1. Text Amendment: HC Highway Commercial District [Pages 6-13]
An ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance for the Town of Fort Mill; Article II,
Requirements by District; Section 9, HC Highway Commercial District; so as to add
Religious Institutions as an allowed use in the Highway Commercial District.
2. Text Amendment: INS Institutional District [Pages 14-18]
An ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance for the Town of Fort Mill; Article II,
Requirements by District; Section 29, INST Institutional District; to establish requirements
for Religious Institutions; to provide for a Public Hearing; and, to provide other matters
relating thereto
INFORMATION/DISCUSSION
1. Preliminary Commercial Appearance Review: Fort Mill Hospital
ADJOURN
The following press was notified of the meeting by email or fax in accordance of the Freedom of Information Act: The
Herald; CN2; WRHI; Fort Mill Times and WBTV. The agenda was also posted at the entrance to Town Hall the required
length of time and on the Town website.
The Town of Fort Mill is committed to assuring accessibility with reasonable accommodation, of Town services and
facilities for all individuals, in compliance with federal law. Please contact the Town Manager’s Office at 803-547
2116 if you need assistance.
1
MINUTES
TOWN OF FORT MILL
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
December 17, 2019
112 Confederate Street
6:30 PM
Present: James Traynor, Tom Petty, Hynek Lettang, Matthew Lucarelli, Chris Wolfe, Ben
Hudgins, Planning Director Penelope Karagounis, Planner II Nick Cauthen
Absent: Andy Agrawal
Guests: B. Bayles Mack, Wendy Chrisley, Toby Chrisley, and Rachel Pierce
Chairman Traynor called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm.
Mr. Wolfe made a motion to approve the minutes from the November 19, 2019 Planning
Commission meeting. Mr. Hudgins seconded the motion. The minutes were approved by a vote of
6-0.
NEW BUSINESS ITEMS
1. Rezoning Request: B. Bayles Mack: Ms. Karagounis provided an overview for the request
from B. Bayles Mack, to rezone two properties, containing approximately 3.267 +/- acres
from GI, General Industrial to HC, Highway Commercial. The applicant’s rezoning request is
based on the desire to down zone for commercial use rather than industrial. The town’s
Comprehensive Plan recommends “employment” as the preferred land use in this location
allowing for uses that can be more feasibly situated as the parcels are bordered by U.S.
Foods and Banks Trail Middle School.
Mr. Wolfe asked a question of where is the pseudo line for commercial districts near
Bradley Park which will be for commercial on the Long-Range Plan? Based on the Future
Land Use Map, this area is considered as Employment.
There was also discussion about access to the Fort Mill Parkway. The applicant confirmed
that the potential access would be from Banks Road and Wolfpack Trail. It would not be
viable to have access to the Fort Mill Parkway due to the close proximity to the bridge.
Planning Director Karagounis stated that access management would be also reviewed by
the SCDOT, the County, and the Town of Fort Mill for the site.
After no further questions or comments Chairman Traynor asked for a motion. Mr. Wolfe
made the motion to recommend in favor of approval of the rezoning request. Mr. Lettang
seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0.
2. Commercial Appearance Review: Rev. Jacob Collins (Eternal Church)
2
Mr. Cauthen provided a brief overview of the request, the purpose of which was to
review and consider granting commercial appearance review approval for a proposed
church located at the end of O’Henry Road. Mr. Cauthen provided a site plan and
elevations to the Commissioners as part of the staff report. The proposal included a
25,000 sq. ft. building along with 226 parking spaces. The Planning Department
recommended approval of the request with the condition for staff to be able to approve
minor adjustments.
Mr. Hudgins asked if there were any material samples available to view? The applicant said
no.
Mr. Lettang said as a general rule the Planning Commission does not approve metal sided
buildings. Mr. Wolfe agreed and said a metal roof is fine but the concern with metal siding
is upkeep.
Mr. Traynor noted that metal siding had unfortunately come up with a couple of other
churches and the Commission has been consistent in their requirements. He is aware there
may be at least one other church in Town that does have metal siding, but it was built years
ago. Chairman Traynor asked the applicant if they were aware of any alternative options
pertaining to siding material.
The applicant stated they were open to other materials, but cost was the biggest factor.
Mr. Petty asked about the framing material of the building. The applicant stated it was a
pre-engineered metal building.
Mr. Wolfe said he was an advocate of new churches, but the metal is a big concern. The
location and layout seem good.
Mr. Traynor noted it would be very helpful to have material samples in the future of the
roofing and walls.
Mr. Wolfe asked if staff found anything else of note that may need to be changed prior to
another submittal. Staff said no.
Mr. Traynor asked about the dumpster location. Mr. Wolfe said there was a note saying
they would have roll-out trash. He followed by saying the Commission always tries to be
sensitive to the appearance of new projects from nearby properties.
Mr. Hudgins noted a concern about the potential traffic resulting from the church. Staff
said Central Ave will be paved and the roads leading to the church will be striped and
resurfaced if needed after construction.
Mr. Wolfe told the applicant that staff could give recommendations regarding materials
that would be acceptable to the Commission going forward. The applicant asked if the
3
sanctuary (back half of the building) could be metal. Mr. Traynor said that metal portions
had come up in the past and the Commission has consistently said no. Mr. Wolfe followed
by saying the intent is to work with you as much as possible but churches and schools
cannot be treated any differently appearance wise than other uses.
The applicant asked if a metal roof would work and Chairman Traynor said the Commission
has no issues with a metal roof considering they actually have a longer lifespan than asphalt
shingles.
After no further questions or comments Chairman Traynor asked for a motion. Mr. Hudgins
made a motion to defer commercial appearance review approval until an alternative siding
material could be presented. Mr. Lettang seconded the motion. The motion was approved
by a vote of 6-0.
3. Commercial Appearance Review: Robert Johnson Architects
Mr. Cauthen provided a brief overview of the request, the purpose of which was to
review and consider granting commercial appearance review approval for phase 2 of a
commercial shell building located at 1500 Fort Mill Parkway. The initial phase was
approved back in January of 2019. Mr. Cauthen provided the previously approved site
plan and elevations to the Commissioners as part of the staff report. The proposal
included a 8,666 sq. ft. addition to the existing 9,913 sq. ft. building. The Planning
Department recommended approval of the request with the condition for staff to be able
to approve minor adjustments. Staff did note the previously approved plan included
enough parking to account for the additional square footage.
Mr. Wolfe asked for an overall site plan for the entire development. Staff stated they did
not have one readily available, but this was simply an addition to an existing building that
was accounted for on the original site plan. Mr. Wolfe stated he just wanted to make sure
this would not negatively affect what was previously discussed regarding the master layout.
Mr. Lucarelli questioned why the previously approved awnings in the P.C. packet for phase
1 were fabric instead of metal. Staff noted that the renderings in the packet were from the
January P.C. meeting, the approved set of construction drawings featured metal awnings
as required by P.C. Mr. Lucarelli followed by saying he just wants to make sure everything
matches between the 2 phases.
The Planning Commissioners discussed the look of the building and felt that it looked very
nice as long as the materials matched the existing structure.
Staff stated the storage building project would be adjacent to the east side of the subject
property and the proposed 7-Eleven would be adjacent to the west side of the subject
property. This is scheduled to be the only multi-tenant commercial building on the site.
After no further questions or comments Chairman Traynor asked for a motion. Mr. Lucarelli
made a motion to grant commercial appearance review approval with the condition giving
4
staff the ability to approve minor modifications to the site plan and elevations if needed
and to ensure the appearance of this phase matches all conditions of prior phases of the
master plan project. Mr. Wolfe seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a vote
of 6-0.
4. Text Amendment: Parking
Planning Director Karagounis provided a brief overview of the staff report and draft
ordinance, which would amend Article I, Section 7, Subsection I (1) (A) of the Zoning
Ordinance for the Town of Fort Mill; so as to add specific parking requirements for
hospitals and in-patient medical facilities; to amend the parking requirements for
religious centers.
We currently do not have Hospital/In-Patient Facility listed as a use in the off-street
parking and off-street loading requirements. After researching other nearby jurisdictions
for their parking requirements, we are proposing the parking regulation for Hospital/In-
Patient Facility to be 2 per patient bed + 1 per every 300 square feet of administrative
area.
Staff has also proposed to combine the parking requirement for the Public Assembly and
Religious Centers together and to have .25 per persons of maximum fire rated capacity
for the off-street parking and off-street loading requirements for both uses. This will
provide consistency with the parking requirement since religious centers can also be
classified as public assembly. There was discussion about how our current regulation for
parking requirements for our religious centers were double the requirement, which the
City of Rock Hill has and almost triple the requirement, which York County has.
Planning Director Karagounis did note an error on the table in the ordinance for the
proposed requirement of Hospital/In-Patient Facility the number “300” square feet of
Administrative Area needed to be added and she would edit the table to include the
numerical value.
After no further questions or comments Chairman Traynor asked for a motion. Mr.
Hudgins made a motion to recommend approval of the text amendment. Mr. Petty
seconded the motion. Mr. Lucarelli stated that we should make a friendly amendment to
the motion to state that the numerical value of 300 square feet of Administrative Area
would be added to the table. Mr. Hudgins made a motion of the friendly amendment to
approve the text amendment. Mr. Wolfe seconded the motion. The motion was
approved by a vote of 6-0.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:22 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Penelope G. Karagounis, MA
Planning Director
December 27, 2019
5
Meeting Information
Meeting Type Planning Commission
Meeting Date January 21st, 2020
Request Summary
Action (Old Bus.) X Action (New Bus.) Info/Discussion
Request Type
Public Hearing Executive Session Other
Case Summary
Annexation Rezoning X Text Amendment
Case Type
Subdivision Plat Appearance Review Other
Title
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF FORT MILL; ARTICLE II,
REQUIREMENTS BY DISTRICT; SECTION 9, HC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; SO AS TO ADD
RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AS AN ALLOWED USE IN THE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Background Information
Discussion With recent development, staff recognized Religious Institutions,
permitted in most zoning districts, is not currently a permitted use in the
Highway Commercial (HC) zoning district.
The text amendment would amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow Religious
Institutions as an allowed use within the Highway Commercial (HC)
districts. Staff recommends that an ordinance be considered that would
permit such facilities in the Highway Commercial (HC) district.
A draft ordinance is attached for consideration.
Alternatives
1. Recommend approval of the ordinance
2. Recommend approval of the ordinance with modifications
3. Recommend denial of the ordinance
Staff Recommendation
Recommendation Staff recommends in favor of APPROVAL of the ordinance
Name & Title Penelope Karagounis, Planning Director
Department Planning Department
6
Date of Request January 21, 2020
Legislative History
Planning Commission 1/21/2020
First Reading TBD
Public Hearing TBD
Second Reading TBD
Effective Date Upon adoption
Attachments
• Draft Text Amendment Ordinance
7
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF FORT MILL
ORDINANCE NO. 2020-___
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF FORT MILL; ARTICLE II,
REQUIREMENTS BY DISTRICT; SECTION 9, HC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; SO AS TO ADD
RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AS AN ALLOWED USE IN THE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Pursuant to the authority granted by the Constitution of the State of South Carolina and the General
Assembly of the State of South Carolina, BE IT ENACTED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF
FORT MILL:
SECTION I. Amending the Highway Commercial District. The Zoning Map of the Town of Fort
Mill; Article II, Requirements by District; Section 9; HC Highway Commercial District; is hereby
amended to read as follows:
Sec. 9. HC Highway Commercial district
1. Purpose of district: It is the intent of this section that the HC zoning district be developed and reserved
primarily as a retail service and commercial area, serving surrounding neighborhoods and larger community
or citywide clientele with a wide range of commercial services, including retail, offices and business support
services located in areas which are well served by collector and arterial street facilities as well as pedestrian
access facilities where appropriate. The regulations which apply within this district are designed to:
A) Encourage the formation and continuance of a compatible environment for highway-
oriented uses;
B) Ensure adequate and properly designed means of ingress and egress;
C) Encourage pedestrian access where appropriate; and
D) Discourage any encroachment by industrial or other uses capable of adversely affecting
the specialized commercial character of the district.
2. Permitted uses: The following uses shall be permitted in any HC zoning district:
Administrative offices.
Research, development and testing laboratories.
United States Postal Service.
Hardware stores.
Horticultural nursery.
Antique stores.
Food stores.
Convenience stores.
Apparel and accessory stores.
Home furniture, furnishing and equipment stores.
Restaurants.
Taverns.
Drug stores.
General merchandise stores such as bicycle and sporting goods, books, stationery, jewelry, toy,
photography, gift, luggage, sewing, catalog, consignment shops (but not flea markets) etc.
Personal service stores such as florists, optical goods, art supplies, telephone stores, pet stores,
travel agents, etc.
8
Pet shops.
Animal hospital specifically excluding boarding facilities.
Banking, lending institutions, security and broker services, insurance companies specifically
excluding check cashing establishments, title loan lenders, deferred presentment lenders,
pawnshops, title loan brokers, and small loan companies.
Real estate agencies.
Dry cleaners and laundry services.
Photographic studios, beauty shops, barber shops, shoe repair.
Funeral service and crematories.
General retail trade such as department stores, food stores, etc.
Gas stations.
Car washes.
Repair garage.
Warehouse (excluding mini-warehouses or personal storage units).
Hospitals.
Offices for health care services, such as doctors, dentists, and nursing, and personal care facilities.
Legal services offices.
Professional offices and workshops for engineering, accounting, research, artists, etc.
Daycare centers.
Recreational activity centers such as bowling alleys, skating rinks, miniature golf courses,
playhouses, and arcades.
Schools.
Hotels.
Theaters.
Religious Institutions.
Seasonal or temporary uses, consistent with the character of the district and in conformance with
all pertinent requirements of the municipal code.
Accessory uses in compliance with the provisions of article I, section 7, subsection G.
3. Conditional uses: The following uses shall be permitted in any HC zoning district on a conditional basis in
accordance with the provisions of article X of this ordinance:
A) Dealerships, new and used automobiles, recreation vehicles, boats, boat trailers, and
utility trailers; provided, that:
1) Stock shall be parked no less than five feet from adjoining property lines and 15
feet from edge of streets,
2) There shall be no storage of wrecked or dilapidated automobiles or scrapped or
salvaged auto parts on the premises.
B) Automotive wrecker service; provided, that:
1) No wrecked automobile shall be stored on the premises outside a fenced area.
2) The fenced area shall be screened from public view. A six-foot-high fence or wall
shall enclose the area, and the area shall be paved or graveled with no grass
allowed to grow in the storage area.
3) Maximum time limit of storage shall be ten days. The date the wrecked vehicle
is received shall be marked on each unit with at least four-inch-high numbers.
4) No other parts or items may be stored in the area.
9
C) Mini-warehouses or personal storage units; provided, that:
1) Any outdoor storage shall be conducted entirely within storage yards separate
from buildings. Such storage yards shall be screened from public view. A six-foot
high fence or wall shall enclose the area, and the area shall be paved or graveled
with no grass allowed to grow in the storage area.
2) Storage of any items, including vehicles, in interior traffic aisles, off-street
parking areas, loading areas or driveway areas is prohibited.
3) Lighting used to illuminate any interior traffic aisle, off-street parking area,
loading or unloading area, or storage area, shall be shielded or so arranged as to
reflect light away from adjoining premises.
4) Mini-warehouses shall be designed, landscaped, screened, or otherwise treated
in a manner that will be aesthetically pleasing and compatible with surrounding
uses.
5) Traffic aisles shall be of sufficient width so as to allow for loading and unloading,
maneuvering and circulation of vehicles, and shall in no case be less than 20 feet
in width.
6) Use of mini-warehouse compartments or yards for any purpose other than the
storage of goods is prohibited.
D) Uses permitted as conditional use: The zoning administrator shall allow the following
uses, subject to compliance with conditions set forth for the use in this section:
1) Check cashing establishments, deferred presentment lenders, and title loan
companies when:
a. The use is (i) located no closer than 3,000 feet, measured lot line to lot
line from the nearest check cashing establishment, deferred
presentment lender, or title loan company, and (ii) located within a
group nonresidential development or like commercial shopping center
with all structures contained in it having a total floor space of 30,000
square feet or more; or
b. The use is wholly contained within the confines of a grocery store or
general merchandise retail establishment having 30,000 square feet or
more of floor space, and the use has no separate access for public use
to its share of the premises, and (ii) is located no closer than 3,000 feet,
measured lot line to lot line from the nearest check cashing
establishment, deferred presentment lender, or title loan company.
2) Tattoo facilities, provided that:
a. The facility shall be properly licensed by the South Carolina Department
of Health and Environmental control pursuant to Sec. 44-34-10 et seq.
of the 1976 Code of Laws of South Carolina, as amended;
10
b. The facility may only provide tattooing services and may not engage in
any other retail or service operations, including, but not limited to, the
sale of goods or the performing of body piercing or any other form of
body modification other than tattooing;
c. Such facilities shall not be permitted within one thousand feet of a
church, school, or playground. This distance shall be computed by
following the shortest route of ordinary pedestrian or vehicular travel
along the public thoroughfare from the nearest point of the grounds in
use as part of the church, school, or playground.
d. Any new tattoo facility shall be located a minimum of 3,000 feet,
measured lot line to lot line, from the nearest tattoo facility.
3) Tool and Equipment Rental facilities, provided that:
a. The minimum lot size shall be three (3) acres.
b. The entire lot or parcel occupied by the use shall be located within 500
feet of the I-77 right-of-way.
c. No building or structure shall be located within 75 feet of a residential
or mixed use district.
d. Outdoor storage areas for rental equipment or vehicles shall be at least
50 feet from any residential or mixed use district.
e. Outdoor storage or display of equipment shall not be permitted within
any front yard.
f. Architectural requirements:
1. Front façade and other elevations facing a street, parking lot
or adjacent residential zoning district: A minimum of 75% of
the building elevation shall contain brick, face brick,
architectural pre-cast brick, or natural stone. Up to 25% may
be split face block, scored block, EIFS, wood or fiber cement
siding, stucco, or other similar quality building material
approved by the Planning Commission as part of the
Commercial Appearance Review Process. No metal siding or
plain concrete block shall be permitted.
2. Side and rear facades that do not face a street, parking lot or
adjacent residential zoning district: Any masonry material or
other similar quality material approved by the Planning
Commission as part of the Commercial Appearance Review
Process.
g. Any outdoor storage area visible from a public right-of-way,
adjoining property or parking area shall be screened by a buffer at least
20 feet in width, which buffer shall include a minimum of 2 canopy
trees, 2 ornamental trees, 2 evergreen trees, and 4 shrubs per 100
linear feet of buffer zone, as measured parallel to the property line. The
11
Planning Commission may allow a reduction in the buffer requirement
in instances where a wall, berm or opaque fence is provided, provided
the purpose of the buffer will still be achieved.
4. Other requirements: Unless otherwise specified elsewhere in this ordinance, uses permitted in HC zoning
districts shall be required to conform to the following standards:
A) Minimum lot area: 10,000 square feet.
B) Minimum lot width measured at the building line: 75 feet.
C) Minimum front yard depth measured from the nearest street right-of-way line: 35 feet.
1) For exceptions to this requirement, see article I, section 7, subsection E.
D) Minimum side yard:
1) Principal structures: Ten feet
2) Accessory uses: Five feet
3) For side yard requirements pertaining to corner lots, see article I, section 7, subsection C.
E) Minimum rear yard:
1) Principal structures: 35 feet
2) Accessory uses: Five feet
3) For rear yard requirements pertaining to double frontage lots, see article I, section 7,
subsection D.
F) Maximum building height:
1) For lots located 1,000 linear feet or less from Interstate 77: 60 feet
2) For all other lots: 35 feet
3) For exceptions to height regulations, see article I, section 7, subsection L.
G) Off-street parking: Uses permitted in HC zoning districts shall meet all standards set forth in article
I, section 7, subsection I., pertaining to off-street parking, loading, and other requirements.
H) Signs: Signs permitted in HC zoning districts, including the conditions under which they may be
located, are set forth in article III.
I) Buffers: Where proposed commercial development abuts one or more lots zoned for residential
use, a suitable buffer screen, wall or fence, six feet in height, shall be provided along each shared
property line to restrict visibility of the commercial use from adjacent residential uses.
SECTION II. Invocation of Pending Ordinance Doctrine. If any section, subsection, or clause of
this Ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the validity of the
remaining sections, subsections, and clauses shall not be affected thereby.
SECTION III. Severability. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions
of this ordinance are hereby repealed.
12
SECTION IV. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective from and after the date of
adoption.
SIGNED AND SEALED this _____ day of ___________________, 2020, having been duly
adopted by the Town Council for the Town of Fort Mill on the _____ day of ___________________,
2020.
First Reading: TOWN OF FORT MILL
Public Hearing:
Second Reading: ______________________________
Guynn H. Savage, Mayor
LEGAL REVIEW ATTEST
______________________________ ______________________________
Barron B. Mack, Jr, Town Attorney Virginia Burgess, Town
13
Meeting Information
Meeting Type Planning Commission
Meeting Date January 21st, 2020
Request Summary
Action (Old Bus.) X Action (New Bus.) Info/Discussion
Request Type
Public Hearing Executive Session Other
Case Summary
Annexation Rezoning X Text Amendment
Case Type
Subdivision Plat Appearance Review Other
Title
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF FORT MILL; ARTICLE II,
REQUIREMENTS BY DISTRICT; SECTION 29, INST INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT; TO ESTABLISH
REQUIREMENTS FOR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS; TO PROVIDE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING; AND, TO
PROVIDE OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO
Background Information
Discussion Staff previously drafted the Institution (INST) District in July 2019 that
initially encompassed school sites. The Institutional District was written
with the intent of expanding other uses other than schools. Those uses
were to include other public or semi-public facilitates such as government
uses, utilities, arts/cultures/civic uses, hospital, daycares, and places of
worship.
The text amendment would amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow Religious
Institutions as an allowed use within the Institutional (INST) District, with
requirements intended to minimize the impacts to neighboring properties.
A draft ordinance is attached for consideration.
Alternatives
1. Recommend approval of the ordinance
2. Recommend approval of the ordinance with modifications
3. Recommend denial of the ordinance
Staff Recommendation
14
Recommendation Staff recommends in favor of APPROVAL of the ordinance
Name & Title Penelope Karagounis, Planning Director
Department Planning Department
Date of Request January 21, 2020
Legislative History
Planning Commission 1/21/2020
First Reading TBD
Public Hearing TBD
Second Reading TBD
Effective Date Upon adoption
Attachments
• Draft Text Amendment Ordinance
15
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF FORT MILL
ORDINANCE NO. 2020-___
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF FORT MILL; ARTICLE II,
REQUIREMENTS BY DISTRICT; SECTION 29, INST INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT; TO ESTABLISH
REQUIREMENTS FOR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS; TO PROVIDE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING; AND, TO
PROVIDE OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO
Pursuant to the authority granted by the Constitution of the State of South Carolina and the General
Assembly of the State of South Carolina, BE IT ENACTED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF
FORT MILL:
SECTION I. Amending the Institutional District. The Zoning Ordinance for the Town of Fort
Mill; Article II, Requirements by District; Section 29, Inst Institutional District; is hereby amended to
read as follows:
Sec. 29. — Institutional District
1. Purpose and Intent:
a. The Institutional district is intended to provide specifically defined areas for the development of
cultural, educational, medical, governmental, religious, and other institutional facilities or
campuses. The purpose is to promote the many varied uses associated with such institutions
while providing specific use requirements designed to integrate the uses into the surrounding
neighborhoods and community.
2. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in any Institutional zoning district, provided that
specific use requirements are met:
1. Schools (K-12):
1. Minimum lot area shall be two (2) acres.
2. Minimum lot width shall be 200 feet.
3. Maximum building height may be up to 55 feet.
4. At least one (1) property line, meeting the minimum width requirement, shall abut and have
direct access to an arterial or collector street
5. All buildings, parking areas and outdoor activity areas (ball fields, tennis courts, playgrounds,
bleachers, etc.) shall have a minimum 35-foot front yard setback and shall be setback 50 feet
from any side or rear property line. Expansions or modifications to facilities constructed prior
to the establishment of this district shall not be subject to the preceding setback
16
requirements, provided that the expansion or modification is constructed so that it is no
closer to any property line than the existing facility.
6. Lighting shall be subject to the requirements of Article 4, Section 6 of the Town's Zoning
Ordinance, except that any lighting for athletic fields shall be exempt from the maximum
height requirements.
7. A 35-foot buffer shall be required along the perimeter of the property line. At a minimum,
the typical IOC-foot section of this buffer, as measured along the property line, shall contain
2 canopy trees, 2 ornamental trees, 2 evergreen trees, and 4 evergreen shrubs. Existing
vegetation may be used to meet these planting requirements, but only upon submission of a
tree survey by the applicant showing that the existing vegetation meets or exceeds the intent
of the buffer.
8. Sidewalks: In conjunction with new development or redevelopment, sidewalks shall be
constructed across the width of the subject property. The sidewalk shall be located within the
right-of-way or within the required setback area of all public and private streets to ensure
current and future pedestrian connectivity. Where sidewalks are not located within the right-
of-way, a public access easement shall be provided. Sidewalks shall be constructed in
accordance with town specifications and standards.
2. Religious Institutions:
1. Minimum lot area shall be two (2) acres.
2. Minimum lot width shall be 200 feet.
3. At least one property line, meeting the minimum width requirement, shall abut and have direct
access to an arterial or collector street
4. To the extent practical, shared parking arrangements should be employed with other uses in
the vicinity, in accordance with the provisions of Article 1, In General; Section 7, General
Provisions, Subsection I.
3. Conditional Uses: RESERVED
4. Other requirements: RESERVED
SECTION II. Invocation of Pending Ordinance Doctrine. If any section, subsection, or clause of
this Ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the validity of the
remaining sections, subsections, and clauses shall not be affected thereby.
17
SECTION III. Severability. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions
of this ordinance are hereby repealed.
SECTION IV. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective from and after the date of
adoption.
SIGNED AND SEALED this _____ day of ___________________, 2020, having been duly
adopted by the Town Council for the Town of Fort Mill on the _____ day of ___________________,
2020.
First Reading: TOWN OF FORT MILL
Public Hearing:
Second Reading: ______________________________
Guynn H. Savage, Mayor
LEGAL REVIEW ATTEST
______________________________ ______________________________
Barron B. Mack, Jr, Town Attorney Virginia Burgess, Town
18
Get email alerts for Fort Mill
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.