City Council
Regular MeetingFredericksburg, VA · December 13, 2011
Minutes
Public Hearing 12/13/11
CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA HON. THOMAS J. TOMZAK, MAYOR
HON. MARY KATHERINE GREENLAW, VICE MAYOR
CITY COUNCIL HON. KERRY P. DEVINE, AT-LARGE
HON. BRADFORD C. ELLIS, WARD ONE
HON. GEORGE C. SOLLEY, WARD TWO
HON. FREDERIC N. HOWE, III, WARD THREE
Council Chambers, 715 Princess Anne Street HON. BEATRICE R. PAOLUCCI, WARD FOUR
Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401
December 13, 2011
The Council of the City of Fredericksburg, Virginia, held a public hearing on
Tuesday, December 13, 2011, beginning at 8:07 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City
Hall.
City Council Present. Mayor Thomas J. Tomzak, presiding. Vice-Mayor
Mary Katherine Greenlaw. Councilors Kerry P. Devine, Bradford C. Ellis, Frederic N.
Howe, III and George C. Solley.
City Council Absent. Councilor Beatrice R. Paolucci – sick.
Also Present. City Manager Beverly R. Cameron, Assistant City Manager
Mark Whitley, City Attorney Kathleen Dooley, Economic Development Director Karen
Hedelt, Economic Development Manager Richard Tremblay, Fire Chief Eddie Allen and
Clerk of Council Tonya B. Lacey.
Notice of Public Hearings (D11-550 thru D11-552). The Clerk read
the notice of the public hearings as they appeared in the local newspaper, the purpose
being to solicit citizen input.
Expanding the Technology Zone to Include the Entire City,
Reducing Eligibility Criteria and Authorizing the City Manager to
17719
Public Hearing 12/13/11
Enter into Performance Agreements up to $100,000 in Total Value, by
Amending City Code Chapter 22, “Businesses”, Article VI, “Technology
Zones” – Action Postponed (D11-551). – 1 speaker. Economic Development
Manager Tremblay summarized the proposed changes to the existing Technology Zone.
He explained that the City had missed opportunities with companies considering
locations outside of the five existing zones and others could not qualify because of the
programs current employment and capital investment eligibility criteria. He said that the
time it takes to bring an agreement to City Council for approval has been challenging for
businesses having to make time sensitive location and leasing or purchasing decisions. In
order to increase the effectiveness of the Technology Zones incentives, he proposed three
changes: making the entire city a technology zone, reducing the eligibility criteria for
businesses to qualify for incentives and authorizing the City Manager to approve
performance and incentive agreements up to $100,000 in total value.
Councilor Howe encouraged council to postpone action on this ordinance until a
work session could be held on incentive across the board. His concern is that existing
businesses have provided revenue to the base and they have to pick up the slack during
the incentive periods for those new businesses. He said a lot needed to be discussed on
incentives as a whole before making changes.
Councilor Solley asked how the changes would affect the incentive program. Mr.
Tremblay stated that it would make more businesses eligible both existing businesses and
new businesses. He said there were many businesses looking at the City but couldn’t
qualify based on the required jobs and in each of those cases if the proposed changes had
already been in place they would have qualified. Councilor Solley also asked if the
17720
Public Hearing 12/13/11
$100,000 was the total value the City would receive over the period of the incentive and
how many of the approved incentives would the City Manager have been able to approve
if the proposed changes had already been made. Mr. Tremblay stated the $100,000 cap is
the maximum tax reduction over the five years cumulative. He said there are three
approved incentives currently and two out of the three approved the City Manager would
have been able to approve.
Mayor Tomzak asked Councilor Howe his reasoning for wanting to postpone a
vote on the technology zone changes. Mr. Howe explained his reasoning in great detail
and stated that he would like to place all incentives on hold until a work session is held
concerning anything that represents a loss of revenue in the budget. Councilor Ellis said
he supports expanding the technology zone across the City, but would also agree to
postpone in order to look more strategically at the incentives. Councilor Solley agreed
that a work session was needed in order to come to a common agreement.
Matthew Kelly, 1309 Hanover Street, stated that incentives should be used to
close a deal. He feels that the City is incentivizing competition. He said the incentives
should be scrapped and the City should find businesses they want and asking what it
would take to get them here.
Councilor Devine moved to postpone action until a work session is held in order
to come to an agreement on incentives; motion was seconded by Councilor Ellis and
passed by the following recorded votes. Ayes (6). Councilors Tomzak, Greenlaw,
Devine, Ellis, Howe, and Solley. Nays (0).
Amending the City’s Tourism Zones, by Adding a Route 3
Corridor Tourism Zone, Reducing Downtown Tourism Zone
17721
Public Hearing 12/13/11
Qualifications Except for Restaurants, and Authorizing the City
Manager to Enter into Performance Agreements up to $100,000 in Total
Value, by Amending City Code Chapter 22, “Businesses”, Article V,
“Tourism Zones” – Action Postponed(D11-552). – 1 speaker. Matthew
Kelly, 1309 Hanover Street, added that there are many infrastructure issues that need to
be addressed and the biggest one is the parking downtown. He said the City needed to
get away from incentivizing restaurants because the investments are so small.
Councilor Howe made a motion to postpone this item; motion was seconded by
Councilor Devine and passed by the following recorded votes. Ayes (6). Councilors
Tomzak, Greenlaw, Devine, Ellis, Howe and Solley. Nays (0).
Adjournment. There being no speakers to come before the Council at this
time, Mayor Tomzak declared the hearing officially adjourned at 8:35 p.m.
Thomas J. Tomzak
Thomas J. Tomzak, Mayor
Tonya B. Lacey
Tonya B. Lacey, CMC, Clerk of Council
17722
Regular Session 12/13/11
CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA HON. THOMAS J. TOMZAK, MAYOR
HON. MARY KATHERINE GREENLAW, VICE MAYOR
CITY COUNCIL HON. KERRY P. DEVINE, AT-LARGE
HON. BRADFORD C. ELLIS, WARD ONE
HON. GEORGE C. SOLLEY, WARD TWO
HON. FREDERIC N. HOWE, III, WARD THREE
Council Chambers, 715 Princess Anne Street HON. BEATRICE R. PAOLUCCI, WARD FOUR
Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401
December 13, 2011
The Council of the City of Fredericksburg, Virginia, met in regular session on
Tuesday, December 13, 2011, beginning at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City
Hall.
City Council Present. Mayor Thomas J. Tomzak, presiding. Vice-Mayor
Mary Katherine Greenlaw. Councilors Kerry P. Devine, Bradford C. Ellis, Frederic N.
Howe, III and George C. Solley.
City Council Absent. Councilor Beatrice R. Paolucci – sick.
Also Present. City Manager Beverly R. Cameron, Assistant City Manager
Mark Whitley, City Attorney Kathleen Dooley, Economic Development Director Karen
Hedelt, Economic Development Manager Richard Tremblay, Fire Chief Eddie Allen and
Clerk of Council Tonya B. Lacey.
Opening Prayer and Pledge of Allegiance. Council was led in prayer by
Councilor Bradford C. Ellis, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Tomzak.
Auxiliary Officer Recognized. Mayor Tomzak recognized the presence of
Officer Kevin Capach at this evening’s meeting.
Update on Stafford Civil War Park (D11-549). Mr. Glenn Trimmer
with the Friends of Stafford Civil War Sites gave a PowerPoint presentation that
17723
Regular Session 12/13/11
summarized Phase I construction, estimated costs, construction statistics, photos of work,
Phase II (2012) construction status. Mr. Trimmer also presented all of Council with coins
commemorating Phase I construction.
Update on the School Division. Dr. David Melton began with an update
on the China Global Partner Program that the City participated in. There are 400 million
students in China. It has the largest standing army and cash reserve in the world and the
third largest economy. He stated that the United States education is often compared to
China’s, but after middle school students in China no longer receive free education. The
quality of education is dependent on how much money the child’s parents have. Students
that graduate from high school tend to come to the United States (U.S.) to continue their
educations and there are over 800,000 Chinese students in the U.S. The program was
sponsored by the Virginia School University Partnership an extension of the University
of Virginia. It was designed to provide an understanding of the importance of studying
China in public education. In preparation of the trip, they had to attend 4 days of
seminars to learn the history, economy, educational system and culture. The goals of the
program were to raise the global and economic awareness of China as a major trading
partner to Virginia and the US. The second goal was to understand the skill the U.S.
students would need to collaborate and compete successfully in the international market
and finally to evaluate the curriculum and syllabi to determine how to address China in
the preparation of the U.S. students in a global economy. They learned a lot about the
history, culture, the economy, government and policies of China and they also learned
about the cultural, economic and political relationships between China and the U.S. and
how China is addressed in the Virginia Standards of Learning (SOL). He stated that a
17724
Regular Session 12/13/11
more detailed presentation would be held on January 9, 2012. The pictures and videos
from the trip are going to be used as resources in Social Studies classes. He also stated
that through scholarships they will send some students to China in 2013.
Dr. Melton also discussed the budget and stated that the Virginia Retirement
System Board has proposed an increase of 10.44% on the teacher rate that will cost the
schools $2.1 million, they are estimating a health increase of 12%, which is about
$400,000 and since the schools have had a gain of approximately 600 student in the last
three years, additional teachers will be needed in the upper elementary level. The local
composite index is proposed to go down which could mean $1.5 million in new funding
from the State.
Dr. Melton updated Council on the initiatives as followed: the first parent
information night was held. Dinner was served and parents had a variety of sessions to
attend. He thanked Mayor Tomzak for leading one of the sessions. The Dropout
Prevention Advisory had met and had an organizational meeting. He said they hope to
have two more this year. He thanked Councilor Howe for volunteering. The Breakfast
buddies program is up and running and they had a great turnout of many great role
models from the community.
Council Howe commended Dr. Melton on the committee for dropouts and said he
was excited for the opportunity to help. He also said the energy management initiative
group had met to address the energy management cost savings.
Citizen Comment. The followings speakers came forward to participate in
the citizen comment portion of this evening's meeting.
Marilyn Brown, 546 Warrenton Road, stated that the Stafford shelters have no
17725
Regular Session 12/13/11
heat and the homeless were going to Prince William County. She also stated that FRED
was not being run properly.
Matthew Kelly, 1309 Hanover Street, asked several questions regarding the
courthouse project: Why was furnishing and equipment removed from the contract? What
is the assessed value of the property? What does the City plan to do after Juvenile and
Domestic Relations Court is moved out of the Executive Plaza? Any plans to upgrade
the technology for the courts? Are the new bathrooms, that will replace the current ones,
going to be temporary or permanent and where are they going? How much is the City
saving on the construction cost? Will Council consider not taking on any big projects
until after elections in May? What’s Council’s thought on the other projects that are
needed; can they be done at the same time as courts? Why isn’t more parking cost
included in the price of the project? What are the views on the impact of this project on
the list of priorities and projects? When is the ARCADIS report being released.
Public Hearings Held (D11-550 thru D11-552). At this time, the
regular session was recessed in order to conduct the scheduled public hearing; the
meeting was immediately reconvened upon conclusion of the hearings.
Council Agenda. The following Council agenda was presented for
consideration.
A. International Institute of Municipal Clerks – Mayor Tomzak
B. Renwick Building – Mayor Tomzak
C. Report on Meeting with President Richard Hurley Regarding Neighborhood
Complaints – Vice-Mayor Greenlaw
International Institute of Municipal Clerks (IIMC). Mayor Tomzak
17726
Regular Session 12/13/11
recognized and congratulated Clerk Tonya Lacey for completing her clerk’s certification.
She is now a Certified Municipal Clerk.
Renwick Building. Mayor stated that they would have to give great
consideration on what’s the best use for the building.
Report on Meeting with President Richard Hurley Regarding
Neighborhood Complaints. Vice-Mayor Greenlaw reported that as a result of the
request from Council at the November 22 meeting regarding the students renting
properties in the City the Mayor, the City Manager and the Vice-Mayor met with
President Hurley and the Dean of Students Douglas Searcy, and the Presidents Chief of
Staff Dr. Martin Wilder. The University is concerned and they are responding by having
more police presence in the neighborhoods. There will be one officer on foot on the
weekends. She noted that the college receives reports whenever a student’s name shows
up at the Police Department and if they appear on a report twice they are brought before
the Judicial Review Board and face sanctions. Mayor and City Manager Cameron
suggested that orientation be strengthened. The University will explore best practices
from other University’s in regards to orientations for off campus living. President Hurley
also requested the names and addresses of the city residents who spoke and complained
to City Council.
City Manager’s Consent Agenda Accepted for Transmittal as
Recommended (D11-553 thru D11-558). Following review and as
recommended, Councilor Solley moved approval of the City Manager's consent agenda;
motion was seconded by Councilor Howe and passed by the following unanimously
recorded votes. Ayes (6). Councilors Tomzak, Greenlaw, Devine, Ellis, Howe and Solley.
17727
Regular Session 12/13/11
Nays (0). None.
• Transmittal of FRED Transit Progress Report – November 2011 (D11
553).
• Transmittal of the Architectural Review Board and the Board of Zoning
Appeals Applications – November 2011 (D11-554).
• Resolution 11-103, Adopting Emergency Operations Plan (D11-555).
• Transmittal Boards and Commission Minutes
o Architectural Review Board – October 17, 2011(D11-556).
o Board of Social Services – October 14, 2011(D11-557).
o Potomac, Rappahannock Transportation Commission – November 3,
2011(D11-558).
Adoption of Minutes (D11-559 thru D11-562). Councilor Howe moved
approval of the Work Session minutes of April, 26, May 24, October 25, and November
8, 2011 and Public Hearing minutes of November 8 and 22, 2011 and Regular Session
minutes for November 8 and 22, 2011; motion was seconded by Councilor Devine and
passed by the following unanimously recorded votes. Ayes (6). Councilors Tomzak,
Greenlaw, Devine, Ellis, Howe and Solley. Nays (0). None.
Ordinance 11-35, First Read Approved, Prohibiting Public
Nuisances and Providing for the Abatement Thereof, by Adopting a
New City Code Chapter 59, “Nuisances,” and Relocating Current City
Code Chapter 38, “Environment,” Article IV, “Weeds and Wild
Growth,” City Code Section 62-4, “Responsibility for Removal of
17728
Regular Session 12/13/11
Refuse,” and City Code Chapter 58, Article V, Division 4, “Inoperable
Vehicles” to the New Nuisance Chapter Repealing City Code Section 38-
79(B) as Redundant (D11-563). City Attorney Dooley stated that in June City
Council directed staff to review operations and laws on the book to determine if the
ordinance could be enhanced to address public nuisances. The nuisances in particular
were noise, property maintenance, overcrowding and alcohol violations as they arise in
rental units. The group of staff convened several meetings to identify areas that needed
improvements. A work session was held on November 22 to discuss staff’s proposals
and Council provided feedback. The proposed ordinance is the result of the process.
The ordinance is an overhaul of the City Code with respect to public nuisance provisions.
The ordinance does not address noise violation and alcohol violations. The noise
ordinance was reviewed and revised in January 2010 in response to a Supreme Court
decision and all alcohol violations are a matter of state code. There are several public
nuisance ordinances scattered throughout the code and this ordinance will bring them all
together in a new chapter of the City Code titled Nuisances. The ordinance also provides
a general prohibition against public nuisances. This pertains to the public’s safety, health
and welfare. It will also clarify and expand the types of public nuisances prohibited,
consolidate administration and enforcement provision, it gives authority to address an
imminent threat to public health or safety and it increased penalties for violations. She
also noted that a number of operation changes that Council requested have been put in
place and they are seeing the effects of those changes already. The committee will
review again in about 12 months to see if they have been successful at meeting Council’s
goal.
17729
Regular Session 12/13/11
Councilor Ellis asked if the inoperable vehicle section would include inoperable
boats. Ms. Dooley stated that the definition of an inoperable vehicle has not changed
from the existing in the Code because it’s consistent with the Virginia Code. She noted
the new section that address outside storage on residential property of abandoned
discarded or unused equipement which list several items. She said if the outdoor storage
of a boat rose up to the level of public nuisance and have an adverse affect of the
neighbor’s health, safety and welfare then it would be addressed by the ordinance. She
cautioned Council of focusing the ordinance on those types of conditions. She stated that
there are conditions that are annoying, and some that reach the level of having an adverse
affect on the health, safety and welfare. It would be decided upon inspection of the
property. Councilor Howe stated that if boats are not specifically listed in the ordinance
will building codes be able to address those issues as they arise.
Councilor Devine noted that the two issues that are not being addressed in the
proposed ordinance are the two that they have the most complaints on, which are alcohol
and noise violations and she asked what avenues were available for those violations. City
Attorney Dooley said they would come under the operations review. She said the staff
understands that this is a high priority for Council and that Council would like to hold the
land owners responsible. The staff decided that after 3 founded complaints with respect
to a rental property the police would make a complaint to City Attorney and the City
Attorney would send a letter to the landowner. After repeated complaints the Police are
making arrest and this will also be brought to the landowners attention and letting the
landowner know they would be held responsible for bringing the property into
compliance.
17730
Regular Session 12/13/11
Upon a motion and as recommended, Councilor Devine moved to approve
Ordinance 11-35, on first read, prohibiting public nuisances and providing for the
abatement thereof, by adopting a new City Code Chapter 59, “Nuisances,” and relocating
current City Code Chapter 38, “Environment,” Article IV, “Weeds and Wild Growth,”
City Code Section 62-4, “Responsibility for Removal of Refuse,” and City Code Chapter
58, Article V, Division 4, “Inoperable Vehicles” to the new Nuisance Chapter repealing
City Code Section 38-79(b) as redundant; motion was seconded by Councilor Howe.
Councilor Howe gave a brief statement thanking staff for the quick response and
he recognized UMW for meeting with Mayor, Vice-Mayor and City Manager. He noted
that there are some great students who do good work throughout the City, but there are a
few bad ones that spoil it for all.
The motion passed by the following unanimously recorded votes. Ayes (6).
Councilors Tomzak, Greenlaw, Devine, Ellis, Howe and Solley. Nays (0). None.
Resolution 11-104 Approved, Increasing the Parking Fees in the
Sophia Street Parking Garage (D11-564). Following a brief overview by staff
Councilor Solley stated that he would like to incentivize the parking in the garage and he
proposed changing the free parking to add an additional hour of free parking.
Upon a motion and as recommended Councilor Ellis moved approval of
Resolution 11-104, increasing the parking fees in the Sophia Street Parking Garage;
motion was seconded by Councilor Howe. Councilor Solley made an amendment to
increase the free parking from two (2) hours to three (3) hours. Amendment was
accepted and the motion passed by the following unanimously recorded votes. Ayes (6).
Councilors Tomzak, Greenlaw, Devine, Ellis, Howe and Solley. Nays (0). None.
17731
Regular Session 12/13/11
Resolution 11-105 First Read Approved, Amending the Fiscal
Year 2012 Budget by Appropriating Fiscal Year 2011 Encumbrances
(D11-565). Upon a motion and as recommended Councilor Howe moved approval of
Resolution 11-105 on first read, amending the fiscal year 2012 budget by appropriating
fiscal year 2011 encumbrances; motion was seconded by Councilor Solley and passed by
the following unanimously recorded votes. Ayes (6). Councilors Tomzak, Greenlaw,
Devine, Ellis, Howe and Solley. Nays (0). None.
Resolution 11-106 First Read Approved, Amending the Fiscal
Year 2012 Budget for Capital and Grant Carryovers (D11-566). Upon a
motion and as recommended Councilor Howe moved approval of Resolution 11-106 on
first read, amending the fiscal year 2012 budget for capital and grant carryovers; motion
was seconded by Vice-Mayor Greenlaw and passed by the following unanimously
recorded votes. Ayes (6). Councilors Tomzak, Greenlaw, Devine, Ellis, Howe and Solley.
Nays (0). None.
Report on the Results of the Bond Sale (D11-567). City Manager
Cameron reported that on November 30, 2011 the City successfully sold bonds to finance
the court project in the amount of $36.7 million to include outstanding bonds issued in
2001. He said there were three major tasks the City had to complete before the sale, the
first was to complete the annual audit, the second was to give presentations to the three
rating agencies, and finally preparing the Official Statement. Each of the tasks were very
complex and he said that Council was very well served by staff, in particular, Assistant
City Manager Whitley, Fiscal Affairs Director Clarence Robinson, Assistant Director of
17732
Regular Session 12/13/11
Fiscal Affairs David MacIndoe and all the members of the Fiscal Affairs audit team. The
audit was completed two months early. He said they were supported by the City’s
Financial Advisor Mr. Kevin Rotty and Bond Counsel Mr. Chuck Schiemer and City
Attorney Dooley.
Assistant City Manager summarized the results of the bond sale. He stated that
nine separate financial institutions bid on the bonds. The low bidder was Raymond
James Financial, with a true interest cost of 3.58% on the combined issue. The total
amount issued was $36,665,000. The City will receive $35 million for the construction
of the project, plus and additional amount of $356,304 to pay the cost of issuance. He
said there will also be an underwriter’s discount of $235,327. The winning firm also bid
a premium on the bonds of $1,496,304 which was used to lower the principal amount
borrowed to $33.8 million. The true interest cost for the court portion of the bond was
3.64%. In fiscal year 2013, the City will pay $1,386,565 in debt service and each year
afterward, the City will pay approximately $2.14 million per year. The total principal
and interest for the courts portion is $54,838,103 and it will be paid out over twenty-five
years. He also noted that because of the historic lows of the interest the principal and
interest savings are about $10 million, over $400,000 saving a year.
The refunding bonds were in the amount of $2,805,000. The true interest cost for
this portion of the issue is 1.73%. The original issue expires in 2022. The City’s gross
savings on this issue is $259,997 over the remaining life of the issue.
Councilor Solley congratulated the staff for their work and for saving the City $10
million.
City Manager’s Report and Council Calendar (D11-568 thru D11-
17733
Regular Session 12/13/11
569). City Manager Cameron asked if there were any questions regarding the
Manager’s report or the Council Calendar. Activities highlighted on the report were as
follows: Tour of the City Builds Ambassadors for Fredericksburg in Washington, DC,
EDA Approves Ten Downtown Façade Improvement Matching Grants, Arts and Cultural
District Incentive Applications Due for 2012, Economic Development and Tourism
November Newsletter, Fire Department Training Overview, New Polygraph Examiner at
Police Department.
Mr. Cameron noted that two long time employees would be retiring at the end of
December, Bryant Skinner the lead mechanic for Public Works (26 years) and Chuck
Dagenhart Manager of Public Facilities (15 years). He also reported that the City had
received an electronic transfer from Virginia Department of Transportation in the amount
of $2,010,000 for the debt reimbursement of the Cowan Boulevard project.
Adjournment. There being no further business to come before the Council at
this time, Mayor Tomzak declared the meeting officially adjourned at 9:17 p.m.
Thomas J. Tomzak
Thomas J. Tomzak, Mayor
Tonya B. Lacey
Tonya B. Lacey, CMC, Clerk of Council
17734
Get email alerts for Fredericksburg
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.