City Council

Public Hearing 10/14/14 CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA HON. MARY KATHERINE GREENLAW, MAYOR HON. WILLIAM C. WITHERS, JR., VICE -MAYOR, WARD TWO CITY COUNCIL HON. KERRY P. DEVINE, AT-LARGE HON. MATTHEW J. KELLY, AT-LARGE HON. BRADFORD C. ELLIS, WARD ONE HON. DR. TIMOTHY P. DUFFY, WARD THREE Council Chambers, 715 Princess Anne Street HON. CHARLIE L. FRYE, JR., WARD FOUR Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401 October 14, 2014 The Council of the City of Fredericksburg, Virginia, held a public hearing on Tuesday, October 14, 2014, beginning at 7:55 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall. City Council Present. Mayor Mary Katherine Greenlaw, Vice-Mayor William C. Withers, Jr. and Council members Kerry P. Devine, Dr. Timothy P. Duffy, Bradford C. Ellis, Charlie L. Frye, Jr. (family emergency, left at 8:16) and Matthew J. Kelly. Also Present. City Manager Beverly Cameron, Assistant City Manager Mark Whitley, City Attorney Kathleen Dooley, Director of Public Works Doug Fawcett, Director of Community Planning and Building Development Charles Johnston, Zoning Administrator Michael Craig, Development Administrator and Code Enforcement Officer Marne Sherman and Clerk of Council Tonya B. Lacey. Notice of Public Hearings (D14-405 thru D14-408). The Clerk read the notice of the public hearings as they appeared in the local newspaper, the purpose being to solicit citizen input. Resolution 14-83, Approved, Approving the Conversion of 1000 Block of Winchester Street (Between William Street and Amelia Street) from One-Way Traffic Northbound to Two-Way Traffic (D14-405). – no 18747 Public Hearing 10/14/14 speakers. Staff gave a brief overview of the application. Councilor Devine moved approval of Resolution 14-83, approving the conversion of 1000 block of Winchester Street (between William Street and Amelia Street) from one-way traffic northbound to two-way traffic; motion was seconded by Councilor Ellis and passed by the following unanimously recorded votes. Ayes (7). Councilors Greenlaw, Withers, Devine, Duffy, Ellis, Frye and Kelly. Nays (0). Rezoning Approximately 4.83 Acres of Land Located on the Southeast Side of the 2100 and 2200 Blocks of Hays Street and the Southwest Side of the 1000 and 1100 Blocks of Oakwood Street (D14- 406 thru D14-408) - 14 speakers. Staff gave a brief overview of the application and Councilor Ellis asked how the traffic impact compared to the businesses that were previously located there. Zoning Administrator Craig stated that trips are generally lower when you go from retail to residential use. Councilor Kelly expressed his concern with some of the Planning Commissioner’s reasoning for opposition, insufficient proffer policies by the City and gateway improvements both of which the applicant had no control over. He was concerned that this was not an appropriate basis for denying a project. Planning and Zoning Director Johnston said these were issues the developer had no control over and the point was well taken. Mr. James Bowen, applicant, 303 Canon Circle. Mr. Bowen has been a resident of the City for 54 years. He owns and operates the Best Western Hotel and he leases the Shoney’s restaurant. His offices are located on the 11 acres tract adjacent to the proposed rezoning. He employs 49 people and Shoney’s has 35. The proposed zoning was 18748 Public Hearing 10/14/14 recommended by Planning Director Johnston and Zoning Administrator Craig. The 11 acre site consists of Commercial-Transitional, Residential-R-2, and Commercial- Highway. There would not any substantial impact on the current businesses and property owners. He said they are taking a piece of property valued at $681,000 and increasing the value to $15 million. Mr. Bowman said over the past 50 years he has been in business he had not asked the City for any concessions and he has paid the full amount for all City services. He said this project alone would generate $360,000 in fees to the City. The 36 homes will house, police, fire, teachers and city employees. He was concerned with how this project would impact the surrounding area, his office and his business so he held a public outreach meeting and approximately 60 people attended. Mr. Bowman said he believed they had answered all their concerns and they plan to meet or exceed their expectations. He feels Governor’s Row would be a boutique project that would be an asset to the community and to the City. Councilor Frye had to leave for a family emergency. Daniel & Chad Webb, developers presented a PowerPoint presentation and they discussed the existing Generalized Development Plan (GDP), existing zoning, proposed zoning, they showed some comparisons from College Hill, Cornell Street and Kenmore Avenue as well as the proposed development. They also discussed the transportation proffers, the façade proffers as well as other proffers, the tax revenue, the Great Oaks Homeowners Association letter listing issues and how they would address each of those issues, traffic, and the Mahone Street intersection improvements. (See D14-407 for more information). Councilor Ellis thanked the applicant and said they presented to project well over 18749 Public Hearing 10/14/14 a year ago to him and he pointed out concerns to the applicant and they listened and they also listened to the neighbors and the Planning Commission and adjusted accordingly. He felt they had done a great job with adjusting the project to satisfy those concerned. Anne Black, 121 Poplar Drive, stated that she opposed the R-8 rezoning. She said her reasons for opposing could be found in the Planning Commission August 13 minutes along with a petition with 97 property owners’ signatures opposing the rezoning. She felt this project was in conflict with the purpose of the R-8 Zoning district in the Unified Development Ordinance which she said it states “attached and detached dwelling types and not and or.” She also expressed concern for the inadequacies of Mahone and Oakwood Streets and she felt the traffic study was flawed. Ms. Black felt this project would have a negative impact on property values, the project density negatively impact the quality of live, and the development has a lack of amenities. (See D14-408 for more information). Beatrice Kerr, 125 Poplar Drive, spoke in opposition of the rezoning. She said she was drawn to Fredericksburg because of its good schools, nice neighborhoods and community feel by rezoning this property it would add more congestion to the City and take away what’s good about the City. She feels this would overcrowd the schools and stated it would add a half million dollars to the school budget and cause a tax increase. She explained that if the zoning were kept as Commercial-Transitional it would bring in more tax dollars. She discussed in great detail the overcrowding in the schools. Ms. Kerr also stated that the proposed townhomes could not be compared to townhomes in the downtown area. The proffers being offered she felt did not come close to what this project would cost the City. 18750 Public Hearing 10/14/14 Rob Mercker, 117 Poplar Drive, spoke in opposition and he felt these townhomes would sell in the low $180,000 to $190,000. He said the property would end up as Section 8 housing in 3-5 years and it would cause a drop in the property value of the homes by 20-40 percent. He feels this will destroy the single family homes value. Debra Vazquez, 117 Poplar Drive, spoke in opposition. She addressed concerns with the traffic and she stated that the downtown townhomes that were used as comparable were not proper. She felt single-family homes would be a better option for this property or design a project that better fit the area. Allen Hall, 104 Poplar Drive, spoke in support of the rezoning. He feels this would be the best possible use for this property. The biggest concern during the Planning Commission was the traffic at Mahone and Route 3. He said there are currently 100-150 homes that use Mahone, Oakwood and Hays Streets for entry and exist and currently he said there isn’t very much traffic from the residences. He added that this project would possibly be a third of the traffic generated. He said the traffic from the commercial properties generate 90-95 percent of the traffic. Carl Braun, 1208 Century Oak Drive, spoke in support and commended Mr. Bowen and the Webb’s for being responsive and he feels they have addressed every concern within reason that they were able to address. He also commended them for stepping up and addressing the traffic problems which were not their fault. He feels this is the best option for this property as it transitions. He also stated that because of the brick exterior and the nice amenities that will come with that these townhomes they would sell at a decent price. Laurie Bendall, 1104 Century Oak Drive, spoke in favor of the rezoning. She 18751 Public Hearing 10/14/14 stated that she had attended the meetings, read all the meeting minutes, looked at the plans and she educated herself before making her decision. She said this was a huge win for the neighborhood that the developer has agreed to pay for the traffic improvements that were needed and she added that there are not many developers who would agree to pay for those improvements. This was a huge compromise on the developer’s part and the neighbors needed to pay attention to this because the City was not going to be able to pay for those improvements. She said she was at peace knowing what would be developed in this space. Tricia Barnes, 482 Promiseland Lane, Locust Grove, VA, Realtor, stated that the proposed townhome character was not compatible with the architecture of the existing detached homes in the area, the noise generated would be great and ongoing, the façade proffers were not adequate to promote a quality constructed project, the proffer do not provide assurance that the quality of material and workmanship would reflect the single- family residential characteristics of the quality of the neighborhood. A low quality project provides greater risk of the project turning into rental units. She added that soil conditions could affect the safety and appearance of the townhomes in the future. She discussed the soil hazards in the area. She also addressed several of the traffic issues. Ms. Barnes said the lack of amenities would be a detractor for homebuyers. She also said this project would negatively affect the elderly neighbors on the corner. Margie Lucas, 1014 Black Oak Court, stated that no one likes change but, she wanted the roads fixed and if it came at the cost of the townhomes she was happy with it. Sabrina Anderson, 1012 Jamis Place, spoke to say you cannot compare a downtown townhome with one on the outskirts of the City as the developer did in his 18752 Public Hearing 10/14/14 presentation. Christina Bruke, 1108 Century Oak Drive, spoke against the rezoning and she encouraged Council to come and take a tour of the neighborhood. She stated how dangerous the roads were and she didn’t feel the additional inches being added would help. She was also concerned that there was currently no place for the kids to play and this project would add more kids with no place to play. She said that the erosion issues still need to be addressed. Shawn Lando, 427 Woodford Street, said he lived in a high traffic area, but he said change was necessary for a community to grow and thrive. He said everyone would like a park like setting, but he noted he would love to have a nice esthetically looking project, all brick with garages to look at but instead he has a law office with apartments on top to look at. He believes this would be a great asset to the Great Oaks Subdivision. Mr. Webb, addressed some of the concerns on Oakwood Street, he said they were improving the entire length of Oakwood Street. He also said they have worked extensively with the Public Works Department regarding Hays and Mahone Streets to make sure they were meeting the needs to accommodate the traffic. Mr. Bowen stated that he had people offering to put in apartments on the site and he resisted doing that. He added that the prices of the units have nothing to do with the project and he feels this is the right thing to do for the City. Councilor Withers thanked the developers for a great project, the citizens for coming out to speak and the staff for their hard work. He had some questions and he wanted additional documentation. His questions were as follows: Is the existing zoning a reasonable use for the property? Is the proposed zoning reasonable? Does the proposed 18753 Public Hearing 10/14/14 zoning conform to the Comprehensive Plan? He also asked that the four neighborhood goals be addressed further as well as the Route 3 corridor. Councilor Withers moved to postpone action and send the project back to the Planning staff for further documentation of the questions listed above; motion was seconded by Councilor Devine. Councilor Ellis said he could not support delaying action because this project had been discussed for well over a year. He also said that the developer had addressed all concerns made by the Planning Commission. He noted that the property would be developed and he did not want to see apartments there but rather a quality project. The said the additional revenue and the fees alone would help with the impact on the schools. The traffic engineers have already stated this would be an improvement. He added that if a commercial by-right use were to go in this location the property value of the homes would decrease more. Councilor Withers said he was only postponing action to get better documentation on the project in case the decision was appealed by either side. Councilor Ellis said this was a difficult vote but he had notice that the project seemed to be half for and half against. Councilor Kelly asked if the project failed on a 3-3 vote what would be the chances of the project being heard again. City Attorney Dooley explained that if the project were denied then the same project could not come forward for a year. Mayor Greenlaw said she considered this a very strong project and she commended the applicant and she was in favor of the project, but she would support the motion with the understanding that the project was to come back at the next meeting. 18754 Public Hearing 10/14/14 Councilor Devine also noted that her seconding the motion to postpone does not dictate her decision on the issue. She said she like the way the project had developed. She said she had some concerns with the rezoning because the City has had a few by- right projects and the impact of those projects had not been evaluated yet. She added that she mostly looks favorably on the project and she appreciated the proffers to the playground and the schools. She also said she had concerns with the added demand on police and fire. She wanted to see it deferred for additional information so that the project was not challenged after the vote. Councilor Duffy agreed with most of the comments that the project was better, but he too was concerned with the long term investments that the City would have to make and the developer not paying for those added City services. The motion to defer passed by the following recorded vote. Ayes (5). Councilors Greenlaw, Withers, Devine, Duffy and Kelly. Nays (1) Councilor Ellis. Adjournment. There being no speakers to come before the Council at this time, Mayor Greenlaw declared the hearing officially adjourned at 9:09 p.m. Mary Katherine Greenlaw Mary Katherine Greenlaw, Mayor Tonya B. Lacey Tonya B. Lacey, Clerk of Council, CMC 18755 Public Hearing 10/14/14 [This page intentionally left blank.] 18756 Regular Session 10/14/14 CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA HON. MARY KATHERINE GREENLAW, MAYOR HON. WILLIAM C. WITHERS, JR., VICE -MAYOR, WARD TWO CITY COUNCIL HON. KERRY P. DEVINE, AT-LARGE HON. MATTHEW J. KELLY, AT-LARGE HON. BRADFORD C. ELLIS, WARD ONE HON. DR. TIMOTHY P. DUFFY, WARD THREE Council Chambers, 715 Princess Anne Street HON. CHARLIE L. FRYE, JR., WARD FOUR Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401 October 14, 2014 The Council of the City of Fredericksburg, Virginia, held a regular session on Tuesday, October 14, 2014, beginning at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall. City Council Present. Mayor Mary Katherine Greenlaw, Vice-Mayor William C. Withers, Jr. and Council members Kerry P. Devine, Dr. Timothy P. Duffy, Bradford C. Ellis, Charlie L. Frye, Jr. and Matthew J. Kelly. Also Present. City Manager Beverly Cameron, Assistant City Manager Mark Whitley, City Attorney Kathleen Dooley, Public Works Director Doug Fawcett, Director of Community Planning and Building Development Charles Johnston, Zoning Administrator Michael Craig, Development Administrator and Code Enforcement Officer Marne Sherman, and Clerk of Council Tonya B. Lacey. Opening Prayer and Pledge of Allegiance. Council was led in prayer by Councilor Matthew J. Kelly followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Young Marine Sergeant Major Kodi Kennedy-Headricks and Boy Scout Scott David Deaderick. Officer Recognized. Mayor Greenlaw recognized the presence of Officer John Fesq at this evening’s meeting. Proclamation for Red Ribbon Week, October 23-31 (D14-404). Mayor Greenlaw presented Young Marine Sergeant Major Kodi Kennedy-Headrick’s with 18757 Regular Session 10/14/14 a proclamation to proclaim October 23-31 annually, as Red Ribbon Week, and encourage all citizens to participate in drug prevention education activities, not only during Red Ribbon Week, but all year long. Citizen Comment. The following speakers participated in the citizen comment portion of this evening's meeting. Joseph Vance, 704 Bunker Hill Street, spoke in regards to parking and other issues with the James Monroe High School students. He said he doesn’t mind the events at the school, but over the years the kids are leaving the school grounds smoking cigarettes and marijuana and leaving cigarette butts in and along his property. He has addressed this in the past with the police, council members and the Principal. He’s had a couple instances where he has caught students urinating in his yard. He requested that the schools mandate the student’s park in the school parking lot, he would like some sort of fence possibly a 6 foot rot iron fence such as the one at Maury Field and he would like the schools to consider banning parking from the school entrance to Bunker Hill. Harold Bannister, 1901 Fall Hill Avenue, spoke in regards to the rezoning project along the Princess Anne Street Corridor that went before the Planning Commission. The neighbors between the Canal and Princess Anne, the Canal and Route 1 and Caroline Street are in favor of any improvements along the Princess Anne Corridor. There were a few items that he and the community was not happy with and the first was the proffer for $26,000. He said for a multimillion dollar project with three high end condos this amount was unacceptable because the cost to educate a student in the City was about $12,000 and the amount being offered was not adequate. He asked that council request a per unit proffer. Mr. Bannister said the community would also like to know the impact of this 18758 Regular Session 10/14/14 project and others on the schools system. He asked that Council have Planning Commission conduct a study on what the capacity is for additional students as well as additional capacity for the facilities to handle current and future students. The third major concern was the bridge over the existing trail and they feel this would cause additional delays and he asked that the developer use the existing road way and align the project with Pelham Street. He said they want to see the project, but want to see those items improved. Sabrina Anderson, 1012 Jamis Place, spoke on her disappointment with Brighton Homes the builder who built her house. She said they were issued notice of violations by the City for 13 building code violations. She said they were also directed to investigate eight more that could be possible violations. She asked that the inspector who inspected her home be retrained because they should not have missed that many violations. Public Hearing Conducted (D14-405 thru D14-408). The regular session was recessed in order to conduct the scheduled public hearings and immediately reconvened upon their conclusion. Council Agenda Presented. There were no items presented to Council. City Manager’s Consent Agenda Accepted for Transmittal as Recommended (D14-410 thru D14-422). Councilor Kelly pulled item 8A for Councilor Frye who had to leave for a family emergency. Councilors Devine and Duffy disclosed that they were members of a business, profession, occupation or group of three or more members affected by the transaction (Resolution 14-82), namely, they are employees of the Fredericksburg Public School System and they were able to participate in the transaction fairly, objectively and in the public interest. 18759 Regular Session 10/14/14 Following review and as recommended, Councilor Kelly moved approval of the remaining City Manager's consent agenda item; motion was seconded by Councilor Devine and passed by the following unanimously recorded votes. Ayes (6). Councilors Greenlaw, Withers, Devine, Duffy, Ellis and Kelly. Nays (0). • Ordinance 14-35, Second Read, Amending the Unified Development Ordinance Definition of “Dwelling, Single-Family Detached,” to Conform to 2014 Acts of the General Assembly Chapter 238 Provisions for Group Homes (D14-410). • Ordinance 14-36, Second Read, Amending the Unified Development Ordinance to Conform to Clarify that Structures that Meet Certain Conditions Shall be Considered Nonconforming in Compliance with Acts of the 2014 Virginia General Assembly Chapter 648 (D14-411). • Resolution 14-82, Second Read, Amending the Fiscal Year 2014 School Capital Fund Budget for Final Adjustments (D14-412). • Resolution 14-83.1, Authorizing the City Manager to Apply for $1,000,000 in Fiscal Year 2016 Virginia Department of Transportation Revenue Sharing Funds for Bridge Rehabilitation and Traffic Signal Improvements (D14-413). • Transmittal of Report on Parking Garage Occupancy (D14-414). • Transmittal of Boards and Commission Minutes o Clean and Green Commission – August 4, 2014 (D14-415). o Planning Commission – September 10, 2014 (D14-416). 18760 Regular Session 10/14/14 o Planning Commission Work Session – September 10, 2014 (D14- 417). o Planning Commission – September 24, 2014 (D14-418). o Planning Commission Work Session – September 24, 2013 (D14- 419). o Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission – September 4, 2014 (D14-420). o Public Transit Advisory Board – August 6, 2014 (D14-421). o Recreation Commission – July 17, 2014 (D14-422). Ordinance 14-34, Second Read, Amending the Zoning Regulations in the R-4 and R-8 Residential Zoning Districts to Change Front and Side Yard Setback and Building Height Requirements in Lots of Record Before 1984; and Amending the Method for Calculating Average Setbacks in the R-4, R-8, and C-T Zoning Districts (D14-409). Councilor Kelly pulled this them for Councilor Frye, who had to leave due to a family emergency. Councilor Kelly moved to postpone discussion of Ordinance 13-34 until the October 28 meeting; motion was seconded by Vice-Mayor Withers and passed by the following unanimously recorded votes. Ayes (6). Councilors Greenlaw, Withers, Devine, Duffy, Ellis and Kelly. Nays (0). Adoption of Minutes (D14-423 thru D14-424). Councilor Devine moved approval of the August 26 and September 9, 2014 Work Sessions and the September 23, 2014 Public Hearing and Regular Session minutes; motion was seconded by Councilor 18761 Regular Session 10/14/14 Kelly and passed by the following unanimously recorded votes. Ayes (6). Councilors Greenlaw, Withers, Devine, Duffy, Ellis and Kelly. Nays (0). Resolution 14-84, Approved, Revisions to the Unified Development Ordinance Procedures Manual (D14-425). After brief staff overview Councilor Kelly addressed the additional wording in the Special Use Permit that states “the Planning office prepares the staff report, and after receiving a draft resolution from the City Attorney” and he said this puts all the writing of the ordinances in the hands of the City Attorney’s office. He said he would like it to say “in consultation to the Planning Staff the City Attorney will”. Councilor Kelly said he would like to defer this item to allow the City Attorney and the Planning Director to make a presentation next week on how this will be implemented. He feels this is a procedural change and stated that this was not how they have operated in the past. Councilor Kelly moved to defer until the next meeting; motion was seconded by Councilor Ellis. Mayor Greenlaw asked Development Administrator & Code Enforcement Officer Sherman if the Technical Review Committee had reviewed this change and Ms. Sherman said they had. She said it was emailed to each of the members and she received feedback from two of the members, but ultimately they had no changes. Everyone reviewed it and there were no request to change. Mayor Greenlaw asked for clarification of who was on the committee and Mrs. Sherman said it consisted of Planning staff, Building and Development, Public works Economic Development and City Manager Staff as well as the Fire Marshall. 18762 Regular Session 10/14/14 Mayor Greenlaw said this had been drafted and circulated for some time and City Attorney Dooley said the process has been on the table for about nine months and her office has always drafted the ordinances and resolutions. She said this would formalize the process as it has worked and it will provide better coordination between the Planning Department and the City Attorney’s Office. Councilor Kelly said it was imperative that this is a smooth process, and that there must be good working relationships in the City and therefore he would like the two to get together and meet about the changes. Councilor Withers said he could not support delaying because everyone was aware of why this was being done. Councilor Duffy asked for a reaction from the Planning Department and Mr. Johnston said this would put him in an awkward position and he said he would prefer to have a clearer understanding of the relationship between his office and the City Attorney’s office and he said he did not believe that clarity exist. The motion to defer failed by a vote resulting in a tie. Ayes (3). Councilors Duffy, Ellis and Kelly. Nays (3) Councilors Greenlaw, Withers and Devine. Upon a motion Councilor Kelly moved approval of Resolution 14-84, revisions to the Unified Development Ordinance Procedures Manual to include the changes “The Planning Office prepares the staff report. The City Attorney, in consultation with the Planning Office, prepares a draft resolution.”; motion was seconded by Councilor Ellis. Vice-Mayor Withers asked for clarification on the process. City Attorney Dooley stated that both the Planning Department and the City Attorney’s office must work together in order to bring items to City Council for review and approval. She said there 18763 Regular Session 10/14/14 was no way the City Attorney could draft a resolution without help from the Planning Department, nor could the Planning Department prepare a staff report without input from the City Attorney. She said it must be a relationship of cooperation and coordination. There must be integration of legal advice from the beginning to the end. She said they cannot operate individually; they can only operate in coordination. The motion passed by the following unanimously recorded votes. Ayes (6). Councilors Greenlaw, Withers, Devine, Duffy, Ellis and Kelly. Nays (0). Resolution 14-85, Releasing Prior Allocations of Motor Fuels Tax Funds for Various Projects (D14-426). Upon a motion and as recommended Councilor Kelly moved approval of Resolution 14-85, releasing prior allocations of Motor Fuels Tax Funds for various projects; motion was seconded by Councilor Devine and passed by the following unanimously recorded votes. Ayes (6). Councilors Greenlaw, Withers, Devine, Duffy, Ellis and Kelly. Nays (0). Resolution 14-86, Authorizing Use of $540,500 of Motor Fuels Tax Funds for Various Transportation Projects (D14-427). Upon a motion and as recommended Councilor Kelly moved approval of Resolution 14-86, authorizing the use of $540,500 of Motor Fuels Tax Funds for various transportation projects; motion was seconded by Vice-Mayor Withers and passed by the following unanimously recorded votes. Ayes (6). Councilors Greenlaw, Withers, Devine, Duffy, Ellis and Kelly. Nays (0). City Manager’s Report and Council Calendar (D14-428 thru D14- 429). City Manager Cameron asked if there were any questions regarding the Manager’s report or the Council Calendar. Activities highlighted on the report were as follows: 18764 Regular Session 10/14/14 VCR Trail – Don’t Walk Really Means Don’t Walk, Officer Recognized for Crisis Intervention Skills, Officer Receives MADD Award, United Way Day of Caring and Holiday Parking Extended in the Downtown Commercial District. Adjournment. There being no further business to come before the Council at this time, Mayor Greenlaw declared the meeting officially adjourned at 9:54 p.m. Mary Katherine Greenlaw Mary Katherine Greenlaw, Mayor Tonya B. Lacey Tonya B. Lacey, Clerk of Council, CMC 18765 Regular Session 10/14/14 [This page intentionally left blank.] 18766