City Council
Regular MeetingFredericksburg, VA · April 8, 2025
Minutes
Public Hearing 04/08/25
HON. KERRY P. DEVINE, MAYOR
CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA HON. CHARLIE L. FRYE, JR., VICE -MAYOR, WARD FOUR
HON. JANNAN W. HOLMES, AT-LARGE
CITY COUNCIL HON. DR. WILL B. MACKINTOSH, AT-LARGE
HON. JASON N. GRAHAM, WARD ONE
HON. JONATHAN A. GERLACH, WARD TWO
HON. SUSANNA R. FINN, WARD THREE
Council Chambers, 715 Princess Anne Street
Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401
April 8, 2025
The Council of the City of Fredericksburg, Virginia, held a public hearing on
Tuesday, April 8, 2025, beginning at 7:33 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall.
City Council Present. Mayor Kerry P. Devine. Vice-Mayor Charlie L. Frye, Jr.,
Council members Susanna R. Finn, Jonathan A. Gerlach, Jason N. Graham, Jannan W.
Holmes and Dr. Will B. Mackintosh.
Others Present. City Manager Timothy J. Baroody, Deputy City Manager Mark
Whitley, Deputy City Manager David Brown, City Attorney Kelly J. Lackey, Economic
Development Director Joshua Summits, Planning and Building Services Director Michael
Craig, Principle Planner Josh Crump, Historic Resources Planner Kate Schwartz, Zoning
Administrator Kelly Machen, Finance Director Amanda Six and Clerk of Council Tonya B.
Lacey.
Notice of Public Hearings (D25-156 thru D25-167). The Clerk read the
notice of the public hearings as it appeared in the local newspaper, the purpose being to
solicit citizen input.
Adopting an Amendment to the 2015 Comprehensive Plan to Adopt
a New Small Area Plan for Planning Area 5 (D25-156 thru D25-157).
22489
Public Hearing 04/08/25
Rezoning Approximately 13.2007 Acres of Land Located in Planning
Area 5 from Commercial Shopping Center to Commercial Highway and to
Adopt Form-Based Regulations, as Recommended in the Draft Small Area
Plan for Area 5 (D25-156 thru D25-157). 2 speakers. Community Development
Planner Thompson presented a PowerPoint presentation and he discussed the
following: Summary, Staff Recommendation, Where in the City are we?, Plan Timeline,
Transect Map, Historic Foundation and Neighborhood Focus, “Brain Power Area, Form-
Based Code, T5-C Core Corridor Transect, Zoning Map, T5-C Core Corridor Transect –
Area 3, Zoning Map, T5-C Core Corridor Transect – Area 6, Zoning Map, T5-C Core
Corridor Transect – Area 10, Village Transition Area, Character Structures, Vehicular
Mobility, Bike/Pedestrian Mobility and Safety, Linking the Uplands Open Space, Zoning
Map Amendment, Staff Recommendation and Zoning Map. See D25-156 for more
information.
Councilor Holmes asked the difference between Commercial Highway (CH) and
Commercial Shopping Center (CSC). Mr. Thompson explained that CSC was older in
nature and was being phased out with the Area Plans. Planning Director Craig explained
that CH was a little more permissive than CSC but they were substantially similar. The
advantage of going CH was that it puts it on par with the other shopping centers.
Councilor Holmes asked if changing to CH would capture the hubs where people
would not need to get in a car to meet their basic needs. She asked if they had looked at
a zoning that would capture that more. Mr. Thompson said step one would be rezoning
22490
Public Hearing 04/08/25
to CH. He said there was a study coming from Rhodeside and Harwell that will look at
commercial corridors and they would see what the recommendations are from the
study.
Councilor Graham agreed that he did not think this had gone far enough towards
the Council’s goals and he hope that the report would help move towards that goal. He
asked if that was the intent of the study. Mr. Thompson said the RFQ was to determine
how they could go further with the CH/T5-C. Mr. Thompson said it was safer to move
in this direction, than to leave it and change it later. Mr. Craig explained that right now
someone could come under the older residential standards and propose a development
that does not have the open space that the City wants. He said making this change
would make it so they have to adhere to the principles of a solid quality of life. They are
working on the levels of usage and they will be bringing it back to Council shortly.
Councilor Mackintosh said he believes many are struggling because it is CH and
highway does not seem to fit the vision that this area articulates, which is a walkable,
mixed-use community. He encouraged Mr. Craig to work with the consultants on a new
way to frame the kind of zoning that articulates what they want in the area.
Councilor Finn asked how Eagle Village could serve as an example for the PDMU.
Mr. Craig explained that applicants typically do PDMU and he said the reason not all of
Eagle Village was included is because someone did a proffered rezoning on themselves
and the City cannot change it because it is a legal thing.
Councilor Holmes said if the City is looking for walkable hubs and it puts out
what it really wants it will let developers know what is wants.
22491
Public Hearing 04/08/25
Councilor Mackintosh asked what percentage of the transition village area
counted as character structures. Mr. Bailey said the ARB did a thorough review of 35
structures and it was cut down to 24. Mr. Craig said about half count as character
structures. Mr. Bailey explained that they looked at the period of significance and their
character and ARB designated 24 of them.
Councilor Mackintosh thought that was a large designation and he asked if there
was a standard of good practice to receive that type of designation. Ms. Schwartz said
there were no metrics it depended on the context and what is there. She noted that the
reason they honed in on the area was that there was a large concentration of those
types of building remaining in the area. The ARB used the document from the National
Association of the Department of Transportation to see how they evaluated
architectural character as well as the national register criteria. This is what they used to
evaluate the metrics of the buildings.
Councilor Mackintosh expressed concern that the character structures are
coming from a period of intensive automobile driven development, which strikes as
intentional with the articulated vision of open walkable mixed-use village center. He
was concerned that if they over designate too many character structures from this
period of history it would be at odds with the environment they are trying to accomplish
for the temporary residents. Ms. Schwartz noted that there was a strong desire for
adaptive reuse in the community and there is a scale to what this level designation
means and character structure is an incentive based methodology. It does not put a
prohibition on demolition it is just a tool.
22492
Public Hearing 04/08/25
Sue Sargeant, 1318 William Street, President of College Heights Neighborhood
Association, expressed concern over the following statement: Comp Plan 11 (5)-2.
Commercial Use: “College Avenue is a highly utilized pedestrian corridor and creates the
opportunity for neighborhood-serving commercial uses through the conversion of
residential buildings to commercial uses”. She said they did not like this idea because
someone could convert the houses in the neighborhood to commercial uses. See D25-
156 thru D25-157 for more information.
Roy Perry, 60 Summerfield Lane, 22405, he said he did not see a clear path
moving forward and what those changes would do for the City.
City Attorney made one correction to the Resolution there was a reference to
Area 10 and it should say Area 5.
Councilor Holmes said she was not comfortable approving this item and she
requested to postpone and bring it back.
Councilor Mackintosh suggested bringing the topic to a work session to give
Council more time to discuss before voting.
Resolution 25-22, Granting a Special Use Permit for 400 PA, LLC to
Construct Five Residential Units on 400 Princess Anne Street (D25-158
thru D25-167). 12 speakers. Zoning Administrator Machen presented a PowerPoint
presentation in the presentation she discussed the following: Overview, Location, Land
Use, General Development Plan, Zoning and Current/Proposed Conditions,
Comprehensive Plan, Zoning District, Special Use Permit Considerations, Special Use
22493
Public Hearing 04/08/25
Permit Criteria, Special Use Permit Considerations, Planning Commission (March 12,
2025) and Conclusion and Recommendation.
Councilor Mackintosh asked if this was considered a mix-use project because of
the coffee shop. Ms. Machen explained that it did not meet the criteria. Councilor
Mackintosh asked for clarification on the units per acre since it did not meet the mixed-
use criteria. It was clarified that it was 12 units per acre.
He also asked about the HOA requiring the residents to use the garages for
parking and how enforceable it is. She explained that she could not require the HOA
documents to have it in there because they can change those, but she could deny any
building permit to convert a garage to usable space. She also said if she found that a
garage was completely used for storage she could send a notice of violation and let
them know they are in violation. Councilor Mackintosh also clarified that the residents
would not qualify for parking permit because they were outside of the permit-parking
zone.
Councilor Gerlach asked if there were any changes since the original application.
Ms. Machen stated there were no changes to the General Development Plan. She said
the changes to the spacing of the trees was made in September 2023. The new
conditions that were added were the parking in garages, replacement of any trees that
may die within 10 years, and the addition of the crosswalk.
Vice-Mayor Frye asked what the requirements were for parking and Ms. Machen
explained that in this area, any new buildings are required to provide parking and they
22494
Public Hearing 04/08/25
are providing 10 parking spaces, 2 per unit. The commercial building is in the historic
district and it is not required to have parking
James Whitman, 1600 Washington Avenue, one of the owners at 400 Princess
Anne Building and said they were looking to build five townhomes on the side and
behind the building at 400 Princess Anne Street. He mentioned the improvements they
will be making such as the brick sidewalks, crosswalk, streetlights, street trees, and
improvements to the handicapped ramps. He said this was an ideal location and it fits
into the city’s Comp Plan, city’s goals, and density around the train station. He said this
would revitalize the neighborhood.
Councilor Mackintosh asked if the three existing units would be for sale and if
not would they be renovated. Mr. Whitman explained that they would not be for sale
and they were recently renovated when they bought the building.
City Attorney Lackey commented on the status of the pending litigation of the
site. There was a hearing and the judge ordered dismissal of the appeal by a citizen to
the City Council’s decision to affirm the Architectural Review Boards Certificate of
Appropriateness. She said should the special use permit be granted it would allow the
developer to proceed to the detailed stage of review. The City is also actively defending
a lawsuit challenging the repeal of the Railroad Station Overlay District but unless and
until the court determines otherwise the City will continue to process applications under
the ordinances that the City believes was properly enacted and nothing prevents
consideration of this project at this time. She did state that the developer can proceed
at their own risk should the laws change during the development process.
22495
Public Hearing 04/08/25
Mo Deadman, 214 Princess Anne Street, spoke in opposition of the special use
permit for the project at 400 Princess Anne Street. She said the existing building would
be stripped of all parking spaces for customers, employees and residents. Additionally,
she said there would be no overflow parking for the townhomes. She expressed that the
height was too tall and it was based on the height of commercial buildings. Ms.
Deadman also said these houses would not be affordable. She said this special use
permit fails in many ways of protecting the neighborhood.
Denise Malczewski, 220 Princess Anne Street, said this project was denied in
2023 because it was a bad project and it was still a bad project. She said the problem
with the special use permit is that it does not achieve what the City wants to achieve,
reasonably priced housing, train station to be a transit hub and the area plan calls for
businesses around the train station.
Ms. Malczewski said this project also does not allow the Tower 1 fire truck to
safely rescue anyone if needed. She said the three units on top of the coffee shop that
could be rented as affordable are used as Air B&B’s. These houses are not going to be a
benefit for the City and she asked the Council to deny the special use permit.
Adam Lynch, 1108 Sophia Street, spoke in support of the project. He spoke of
the benefits such as streetscape, trees, lights, close to the train and a better use of the
land. He said density brings in benefits and he asked the Council to support the
development.
Nancy Moore (D25-160), 314 Princess Anne Street, stated that this project does
not belong in the historic neighborhood of small two story homes. She said the density
22496
Public Hearing 04/08/25
was too high and the removal of the parking for the coffee shop would create parking
problems for the business
John Sperlazza (D25-161), 113 Caroline Street, stated that the townhomes were
too tall for the area and they do not meet scale and massing of subordinate neighboring
buildings. He said removal of the parking would cause issues, firefighters will not be
able to effectively fight fires and it does not support the City’s goals of affordable
housing.
John Urban (D25-162), 300 Princess Anne Street, spoke in opposition of
approving a special use permit for the proposed project at 400 Princess Anne Street.
Valarie Keane (D25-163), 300 Princess Anne Street, spoke in opposition of
approving a special use permit for the proposed project at 400 Princess Anne Street.
Robert Thomas (D25-164), 809 Brompton Street, spoke in support of the special
use permit for the project at 400 Princess Anne Street. He said this area needed denser
housing.
Forrest Wilhoit (D25-165), 1402 Caroline Street, urged the Council to reject the
proposal at 400 Princess Anne Street because of the near unanimous opposition from
Darbytown. He said this plan violates the Comprehensive Plans intent for infill near the
railroad station. He called on the Council to work with them to implement real solutions
that serve all residents – not just those who can afford luxury housing. See D25-165 for
more information.
Lissah Michalski (D25-166), 316 Frederick Street, expressed her concern that
400 Princess Anne was part of a recurring, problematic development pattern that
22497
Public Hearing 04/08/25
threatens the character of her historically unique block. She said this calls for a more
careful approach to the future of Fredericksburg’s most valuable and prominent historic
gateway. Ms. Michalski said this area deserves more thorough discussion and scrutiny.
Allowing the developer to build massive 50-foot structure directly across from her tiny
duplex and near other critical historical resources will erode what remains of the rare
and irreplaceable historic context. See D25-166 for more information.
Paula Chow (D25-167), 132 Caroline Street, spoke in opposition of this project
being built. She asked the Council to consider that the size and scale does not fit into
the tiny lot. Ms. Chow said the character is what draws people to the City but if you
destroy the character with inappropriate infill it will no longer draw people here. She
added that this project was not a solution for affordable housing. She also expressed
concern about the one mature tree that will suffer and eventually die due to the
development.
Councilor Graham asked if this was a multi-family development instead of
townhomes how it would affect parking and Ms. Machen said it would decrease the
parking requirement.
Councilor Graham asked the applicant if he considered more units and Mr.
Whitman said they looked at every scenario and that was not feasible with the
restriction of the size of the lot. He also asked if condominium were considered. Mr.
Whitman said they did consider it but with the size of the lot and the restrictions on
condominiums and the way you have to get in and out, the parking, and with fire
restrictions they could not make it work.
22498
Public Hearing 04/08/25
Councilor Mackintosh said this building was the same height of the Janney
Marshall and the Beanery Building but he asked the height of the Purina Tower and Ms.
Schwartz said it was 50 feet tall. He stated that all the boards that advise the Council
had reviewed this project, they have been overwhelmingly supportive, and Ms.
Schwartz said they were.
Councilor Gerlach confirmed that if the Council approves the project it would go
to the Architectural Review Board for review of all the details and Ms. Schwartz
confirmed.
City Attorney Kelly noted that the most recent revision of the General
Development Plan date was not reflected in the resolution. It should say April 8, 2025
instead March 17, 2025.
Council Graham moved to approve Resolution 25-22, granting a special use
permit for 400 PA, LLC to construct five residential units on 400 Princess Anne Street as
amended by Ms. Lackey; motion was seconded by Councilor Gerlach.
Mayor Devine said she has given this careful consideration and she thanked the
Architectural Review Board and the Planning Commission for addressing issues. She
added that the City would continue to struggle with infill because it is confined in space
and people want to live here.
Vice-Mayor Frye said he know this will not make people happy but as he looked
at the whole area, the City has done a great job with projects that have been revitalized
in the area.
22499
Public Hearing 04/08/25
The motion passed by the following recorded votes. Ayes (7). Councilors Devine,
Frye, Finn, Gerlach, Graham, Holmes and Mackintosh. Nays (0).
Adjourned. There being no speakers to come before the Council at this time,
Mayor Kerry P. Devine declared the hearing officially adjourned at 8:33 p.m.
Kerry P. Devine _
Kerry P. Devine, Mayor
Tonya B. Lacey
Tonya B. Lacey, Clerk of Council, MMC
APPROVED
10-10-23
22500
Regular Session 04/08/25
HON. KERRY P. DEVINE, MAYOR
CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA HON. CHARLIE L. FRYE, JR., VICE -MAYOR, WARD FOUR
HON. JANNAN W. HOLMES, AT-LARGE
CITY COUNCIL HON. DR. WILL B. MACKINTOSH, AT-LARGE
HON. JASON N. GRAHAM, WARD ONE
HON. JONATHAN A. GERLACH, WARD TWO
HON. SUSANNA R. FINN, WARD THREE
Council Chambers, 715 Princess Anne Street
Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401
April 8, 2025
The Council of the City of Fredericksburg, Virginia, held a regular session on
Tuesday, April 8, 2025, beginning at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall.
City Council Present. Mayor Kerry P. Devine. Vice-Mayor Charlie L. Frye, Jr.,
Council members Susanna R. Finn, Jonathan A. Gerlach, Jason N. Graham, Jannan W.
Holmes and Dr. Will B. Mackintosh.
Others Present. City Manager Timothy J. Baroody, Deputy City Manager Mark
Whitley, Deputy City Manager David Brown, City Attorney Kelly J. Lackey, Economic
Development Director Joshua Summits, Planning and Building Services Director Michael
Craig, Principle Planner Josh Crump, Historic Resources Planner Kate Schwartz, Zoning
Administrator Kelly Machen, Finance Director Amanda Six and Clerk of Council Tonya B.
Lacey.
Opening Prayer and Pledge of Allegiance. Council was led in prayer by
Vice-Mayor Charlie L. Frye, Jr. followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilor
Jason N. Graham.
Officer Recognized. Mayor Devine recognized the presence of Detective
Johnny Wright at this evening’s meeting.
22501
Regular Session 04/08/25
Consent Agenda Accepted for Transmittal as Recommended (D25-
152 thru D25-155). Councilor Gerlach moved approval of the City Manager’s consent
agenda; motion was seconded by Councilor Graham and passed by the following
recorded votes. Ayes (7). Councilors Devine, Frye, Finn, Gerlach, Graham, Holmes and
Mackintosh. Nays (0).
o Transmittal of Ordinance Changing the District 4 Polling Place from New City
Fellowship Church to the Schools Administration Building (D25-152).
o Approval of Nomination for the Virginia Municipal League 2025 Policy Committee
Nominations (D25-153).
o Transmittal of the Board and Commission Minutes
o Planning Commission – December 11, 2024 (D25-154).
o Public Transit Advisory Board – February 5, 2025 (D25-155).
Public Hearing (D25-156 thru D25-167). The regular session was recessed
in order to conduct scheduled public hearings and immediately reconvened upon their
conclusion.
Citizen Comment. The following comments were given and/or submitted to
be read during the citizen comment portion of this evening’s meeting.
Mary Beth Rich, 1609 Augustine Avenue, Board President for Habitat for
Humanity, said she was trying to bring six affordable homes to the Mayfield Community.
After three years, this project was at risk of not proceeding. She said when they met
with Technical Review Committee in 2022 about extending the cul-de-sacs on
22502
Regular Session 04/08/25
Canterbury, Newell and Davies Streets and because it encroached into the Resource
Protection Area it was rejected. Staff proposed edits and it brought the proposal down
to nine and with that revision they could not afford to build out the cul-de-sacs. The
only viable path was to build out Davies Street and they were able to fit six homes
within those restraints.
Ms. Rich said they have submitted the project four times, each round included
detailed feedback from staff and issues were addressed, and they believed they were
ready to move forwards. On April 3, staff raised two new issues that jeopardize that
entire project. The first suggestion was to apply to the US Army Corps of Engineer and
Department of Environmental Quality for wetlands permits. She said this was the
opposite of what they were originally told.
The second issue was a stormwater pipe on an adjacent property. The pipe
would need to be replaced and extended due to grading changes but staff believes the
current easement would not be sufficient to allow for the adjustment. She said this issue
was never raised and now it may stop the process. She said they could not afford to
start over.
Council Agenda Presented. The following items were presented to Council
for discussion.
8A. Economic Development Authority and City Relations Committee Council
Appointment – Mayor Devine
8B. Noise Ordinance – Mayor Devine
8C. Bragg Hill Clean Up Day – Vice-Mayor Frye
22503
Regular Session 04/08/25
8D. Community Conversation on Train Derailment – Vice-Mayor Frye
8E. Sign Board – Councilor Graham
8F. Habitat for Humanity – Councilor Gerlach
Economic Development Authority and City Relations Committee
Council Appointment – Councilor Graham moved to appoint Councilor Mackintosh
to the Economic Development Authority and City Relations Committee; motion was
seconded by Councilor Holmes and passed by the following recorded votes. Ayes (7).
Councilors Devine, Frye, Finn, Gerlach, Graham, Holmes and Mackintosh. Nays (0).
Noise Ordinance – Mayor Devine stated that spring was here and it comes
with noise issues. She explained that the City was trying to work with Fairfax County to
ask for permission for it to be a pilot program to be able to ticket those violating the
noise ordinance but Governor Youngkin vetoed it. She stated how it affects the
downtown and the Council would continue to work on it.
Bragg Hill Clean Up Day – Vice-Mayor Frye invited anyone who wanted to
attend and help with the cleanup at Bragg Hill. He said they would meet at the
basketball Court from 9:00 am – 12:00 PM on Saturday, April 12.
Community Conversation on Train Derailment – Vice-Mayor Frye said
there was a community meeting last month in regards to the train derailment from last
year. He said there were three questions that were asked: is there a specific location
where railcars cannot be parked; is there a trip alarm sensor that could alarm if there is
a derailment; and if there was another problem like this, was there somewhere for
22504
Regular Session 04/08/25
people to be housed? Vice-Mayor Frye informed the public that he would get the
answers to those questions and report back.
Councilor Gerlach stated that there was an emergency evacuation plan that was
presented to the residents a few years ago.
Sign Board – Councilor Graham said he heard from some downtown business
owners about the sign board policies, regarding materials. Currently, the materials are
restricted to wood and metal and they asked if high-grade polymers could be included.
He asked to direct staff to review the policy, Council agreed.
Habitat for Humanity – Councilor Gerlach followed up on the Habitat for
Humanity comment and he wanted to let people know that the Council does not run the
City, the staff does. He said there was a charter that prevents the Council from
interfering with the operations of the city departments. He said he has toured Habitat
for Humanity houses and they are fantastic. He asked if staff could do anything to move
this along, he would be grateful.
Adoption of Minutes. Councilor Graham moved to approve the Public
Hearing and Regular Session minutes of February 25, 2025 and March 11, 2025, and the
Regular Session minutes of March 25, 2025; motion was seconded by Councilor Holmes
and passed by the following recorded votes. Ayes (7). Councilors Devine, Frye, Finn,
Gerlach, Graham, Holmes and Mackintosh. Nays (0).
Resolution 25-23, Approved, Member Revision to the City Towing
and Recovery Board (D25-168). Councilor Mackintosh moved to approve
22505
Regular Session 04/08/25
Resolution 25-23, Member Revision to the City Towing and Recovery Board; motion was
seconded by Councilor Graham and passed by the following recorded votes. Ayes (7).
Councilors Devine, Frye, Finn, Gerlach, Graham, Holmes and Mackintosh. Nays (0).
Appointment to Rappahannock Emergency Medical Services – Chief
Mike Jones (D25-169). Councilor Mackintosh moved to appoint Chief Mike Jones to
the Rappahannock Emergency Medical Services Council; motion was seconded by
Councilor Gerlach and passed by the following recorded votes. Ayes (7). Councilors
Devine, Frye, Finn, Gerlach, Graham, Holmes and Mackintosh. Nays (0).
Resolution 25-24, Initiating the Process to Amend and Readopt the
City of Fredericksburg’s Comprehensive Plan (D25-170 thru D25-172). Upon
a motion by Councilor Graham, to approve Resolution 25-24, initiating the process to
amend and readopt the City of Fredericksburg’s Comprehensive Plan; motion was
seconded by Councilor Gerlach and passed by the following unanimously recorded
votes. Ayes (7). Councilors Devine, Frye, Finn, Gerlach, Graham, Holmes and
Mackintosh. Nays (0).
Discussion on Potential to Fund a Grant to the Rappahannock Area
Community Services Board (RACSB) to Support a Street Outreach
Coordinator Position (D25-173). City Manager Baroody said this was a
recommendation after months of work. He said they worked closely with RACSB, the
City would grant money for the position, and they have tentatively agreed to hire a
position, titled Homeless Outreach. This person would be responsible for homelessness
22506
Regular Session 04/08/25
prevention in the downtown and throughout the City. They will report to and work for
RACSB under a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the City. He said as of today,
there has been over 320 calls to the 911 Center for interaction with homeless related
issues. He said they are trying to create a strategic path and this partnership helps with
that. This person would work all different times, interact with the homeless, and build
relations and they can help address issues as they arise.
Ms. Finn thanked staff for the work gone into this and she suggested that the
picture might be broader than homelessness. She said much of this was tied to
homelessness, but there could be someone who was recently housed and still need this
kind of intervention service. She asked if the language could be clarified.
Councilor Mackintosh asked if the 320-911 calls could be quantified he wanted
to see what the fiscal saving would be. Mr. Baroody said it was not an easy number to
get but he would do his best.
Councilor Graham thanked staff for the work on this and he was looking forward
to working with RACSB. He was hopeful it would make a positive effect of the
community.
Councilor Gerlach said this reminds him that we are a small City with big City
problems and being a small City allows the City to move nimbly to solve them.
Mayor Devine said the City is a small City with a big heart. The compassion that
the community continues to show to the less fortunate and the unhoused is
commendable. She commends staff for pursuing this and the community for often being
behind the efforts.
22507
Regular Session 04/08/25
Councilor Holmes reminded people that this conversation started months ago
and it was brought up at the George Washington Regional Commission (GWRC) as a way
to address the unhoused population regionally. She said the City has also encouraged
its neighbors to look at a position like this. This is a regional challenge and it will have a
greater impact if everyone works together. This is a person who can be a liaison
between the businesses downtown and the unhoused and they can educate both ways
to make challenges less challenging.
Fiscal Year 2025 Financial Update (D25-174 thru D25-175). Finance
Director Six briefed the Council on its Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Financial condition. She said
that through March the City had collected $69.5 million or 57.5% of its total budget.
Real Estate tax was at $22.1 million or 51.1% of the FY 2025 budget and $6.63 million
collected in personal property taxes. The FY25 meals taxes have had some ebb and flow
but the year to date average shows growth year over year. The FY25 sales tax had a
large increase in sale for Christmas but year over year the sales tax numbers look good.
Ms. Six said the investment income was very strong this FY. Lodging taxes have collected
about $1.7 million year-to-date. The EMS fees-for-service revenue bills total $1.7
million and were sent out and they should start collecting on them soon. She said at this
point they have not been notified that any of the State or Federal grants have or will be
impacted.
Ms. Six explained that there has been $93.1 million in General Fund expenditures
spent to date. They are projecting a slightly higher than normal savings in the General
22508
Regular Session 04/08/25
Fund due to personnel savings in FY25. She anticipated that expenditures would be
about $5.1 million under budget.
City Manager’s Report and Council Calendar (D25-176 thru D25-
177). City Manager Baroody directed the Council’s attention to the Manager’s Update:
City Manager's Recommended Budget for FY 2026, Annual Water Disinfection and
Flushing, Fire Hydrant Flushing, Stay Informed, Arbor Day Celebration, April is Child
Abuse Prevention Month, Mark Your Calendars, Earth Day Festival, Volunteers
Welcome, The Fredericksburg Memorials Advisory Commission is Seeking Nominations
for the City Wall of Honor, Traffic Safety Initiative, 2025 Summer Programs, and FXBG
Snapshot.
Adjournment. There being no further business to come before the Council at
this time, Mayor Devine declared the meeting officially adjourned at 9:51 p.m.
Kerry P. Devine _
Kerry P. Devine, Mayor
Tonya B. Lacey
Tonya B. Lacey, Clerk of Council
22509
Regular Session 04/08/25
[This page intentionally left blank]
22510
Get email alerts for Fredericksburg
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.