City Council Agendas & Minutes
Regular MeetingFruit Heights, UT · December 6, 2022
Minutes
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FRUIT HEIGHTS CITY
910 South Mountain Road
December 6, 2022
WELCOME: Mayor John Pohlman called the meeting to order at 6:01
PLEDGE & OPENING CEREMONY: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member
Diane Anderson and a word of prayer offered by Council Member Eileen Moss.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Eileen Moss, Diane Anderson, Florence Sadler, George
Ray, Gary Anderson and Mayor John Pohlman.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Brandon Green, City Employee Hailee Ballingham,
Recording Secretary Lindsay Golightly.
VISITORS: Clarke Moss, BreAnne Anderson, Mrs. Ray
CITY COUNCIL TRAINING: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS: None.
CITY BUSINESS:
Received a few Planning Commission applications
Looking to make an appointment for Mosquito Abatement Board
PUBLIC HEARING:
Review/Discuss/Approve/Deny Amendment to Baer Canyon Estates Subdivision
City Manager Brandon Green provided background on the Amendment to the Baer Canyon
Estates Subdivision explaining that it is an amended phase 3 estate plat. Lot 16 is selling
property to 17 and 18. The planning commission heard and discussed this amendment to the Baer
Canyon Estates Subdivision and recommended it for approval.
It was discussed that these changes do not impact city requirements for any of the three affected
properties with the flag lot being grandfathered in. The easements from previous lot lines must
remain in place due to existing utility lines.
Mayor John Pohlman excused Council Member Eileen Moss from voting.
Council Member Diane Anderson moved to approve the amendment to the Baer Canyon Estates
Subdivision. George Ray seconded the approval, it was unanimously approved by Council
Members Diane Anderson, Gary Anderson, Florence Sadler, and George Ray with Eileen Moss
abstaining.
Review/Discuss/Approve/Deny Interlocal Agreement between Fruit Heights City and Davis
County
City Manager Brandon Green provided background explaining that land was purchased from the
driving range in the golf course, but Davis County is responsible for watering, etc. Both the City
and Davis County attorneys have both looked over the agreements and feel comfortable with the
arrangements.
Council Member George Ray moved to approve the Interlocal Agreement between Fruit Heights
City and Davis County. The motion was seconded by Council Member Eileen Moss and was
unanimously approved by the City Council Members attending the meeting. (13:00)
Review/Discuss/Approve/Deny Amendments to the Animal Care and Control Ordinance
City Manager Brandon Green provided background explaining that Davis County provides
animal care services for all cities in Davis County. In the past, cities have contracted for that
service, but the service is moving to be taken over by Davis County without contracts with
individual cities. They have come to all cities in Davis County to request the ordinances be
consistent throughout the county. The animal care facility is at capacity, so Davis County is
requesting the ordinances be changed be 3 animals before a kennel license is required instead of
the previous 2 animals that was allowed before requiring a kennel license to allow the
opportunity for potential fostering to help relieve the animal shelter situation. The change is
going from needing a kennel license to have a third pet to being able to have 3 but then require a
kennel license to house any more animals.
It was discussed that 3 animals feels like an arbitrary number, but it was explained that 3 animals
was due to the surrounding cities already require 3 so to provide consistency to the ordinances
within the cities 3 animals was decided. The concern was also that there was no wording of
animal care, nuisance animals, or impacts on neighborhoods regarding the number of animals
allowed. City Manager Brandon agreed to pass these concerns on to Davis County.
Council Member Gary Anderson motioned to move the Amendments to the Animal Care and
Control Ordinance with Council Member Diane Anderson seconding the motion. The Council
unanimously approved the Amendments to the Animal Care and Control Ordinance.
REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS: None.
UPCOMING EVENTS:
Sunday December 11th at 6:00pm Christmas in the Community at Fruit Heights City Hall
CITY COUNCIL & STAFF REPORTS:
In the Planning Commission Chairman Curtis Tanner is stepping down from the Chair with
Commissioner Carrie Carroll taking his place as the new Chairman of the Planning Commission.
Council Member Eileen Moss motioned to adjourn the December 6, 2022 City Council meeting
with Gary Anderson seconding that motion. The Council unanimously approved adjourning the
meeting.
Not approved until signed.
/s/:________________
Brandon Green, City Recorder
Date approved by City Council: January 17,2023
Agenda
FRUIT HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING
December 6, 2022, Fruit Heights City Council Chambers
910 S Mountain Road Fruit Heights City, UT 84037
6:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Meeting is being held at 6:00 pm due to the City
Council Christmas Party
1. WELCOME: MAYOR JOHN POHLMAN
1.1. Pledge of Allegiance and Opening Ceremony (By Invitation)
1.2. Roll Call
1.3. City Council Training: City Council Member
2. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT(S) OF INTEREST
2.1. SPECIAL PRESENTATION(S)
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS – The public may address the mayor regarding issues that are not on the agenda. We
ask that you please limit your comments to 3 minutes.
No action may be taken on any item not on the agenda
4. CITY BUSINESS:
4.1. Review/Discuss/Approve/Deny Amendment to Baer Canyon Estates Subdivision.
4.2. Review/Discuss/Approve/Deny Amendments to the Animal Care and Control Ordinance
4.3. Review/Discuss/Approve/Deny Interlocal Agreement between Fruit Heights City and Davis County
5. ELECTRONIC MEETING: By motion of the Fruit Heights City Council, Elected Officials and City Staff
can participate in regularly scheduled meetings via electronic media when approved by the mayor.
Fruit Heights City is now streaming City Council Meetings on its YouTube Channel. Please use the
link below to join us!
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaIqHYd0U5RCpaDo8rquABw
6. ADJOURNMENT:
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of this agenda was posted on the City’s website, www.fruitheightscity.com, as
well as posted on the Utah State public notice website http://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html, and was emailed to at
least one newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdiction of the public body.
R. Brandon Green
R. Brandon Green - City Recorder
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this
meeting should contact the City Manager, Brandon Green at (801)546-0861, at least 24 hours prior to the meeting.
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN DAVIS COUNTY AND FRUIT HEIGHTS CITY
PROVIDING FOR MAINTENANCE AND USES OF THE CITY OWNED STORM
WATER DETENTION BASIN ADJACENT TO THE GOLF COURSE
THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the ____ day of
, 2022, between DAVIS COUNTY, and FRUIT HEIGHTS CITY, hereinafter
collectively referred to as the “Parties” and sometimes individually as a “Party.”
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Title 11, Chapter 13 of the Utah Code Annotated, 1953, as amended,
authorizes contracts between public agencies for the performance of any governmental service or
activity which each public agency is authorized to perform and agreements for joint or cooperative
action between such agencies; and
WHEREAS, Davis County via UDOT is in the process of conveying ownership of Pond
G (see attached exhibit A) to Fruit Heights City; and
WHEREAS, Pond G is a detention basin that will receive storm water runoff from UDOT
roads and Fruit Heights City Roads; but shall be maintained as a detention basin by Fruit Heights
City; and
WHEREAS, the underlying ground of Pond G was formerly part of the Davis Park Golf
Course Driving Range; and
WHEREAS, Davis County desires to reincorporate the area of Pond G into its Davis Park
Golf Course Driving Range (“Range”); and
WHEREAS, Fruit Heights City, does not oppose Pond G being re-incorporated into the
Range; and
WHEREAS, each of the Parties hereto are governmental entities located within Davis
County, State of Utah and are empowered to own, operate and maintain storm water infrastructure
and facilities for the benefit of their citizens; and
WHEREAS, proper and adequate maintenance of Pond G provide a benefit to the Parties
hereto and to members of the public; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to allocate certain maintenance responsibilities among the
Parties in conjunction with maintaining and operating Pond G (see attached exhibit B); and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to reduce their respective understandings and agreement to
writing;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants contained herein, and other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
and in compliance with and pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Interlocal Cooperation Act
referred to hereinabove, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
1. INITIAL LANDSCAPTING AND ONGOING MAINTENANCE SERVICES
TO BE PERFORMED BY DAVIS COUNTY. Davis County hereby agrees at its sole cost and
expense to install all landscaping required in order to incorporate Pond G into the Range.
2. FRUIT HEIGHTS CITY’S RIGHT TO REVIEW. Davis County agrees to
provide a landscaping plan to Fruit Heights City, prior to beginning any installation of grass,
irrigation, or other landscaping elements. This review is to ensure that the primary purpose of
Pond G will not be compromised by the landscaping plans of Davis County.
3. NOT DISTURANCE. Davis County agrees it will not disturb the grading without
prior written consent from Fruit Heights City. Davis County acknowledges that the primary
purpose of POND G is to detain storm water, and any other purpose is secondary to the primary
purpose.
4. CITY OBLIGATIONS. Fruit Heights City shall have the sole responsibility to
maintain the storm water infrastructure coming into and out of Pond G.
5. ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement is not assignable.
6. RESPONSIBILITY FOR EMPLOYEES. Each Party shall be responsible for and
shall defend the actions of its own employees and/or contractors or subcontractors, negligent or
otherwise, performed pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. Each Party shall be solely
responsible for providing workers’ compensation, wages and benefits for its own personnel who
provide any assistance under the terms of this Agreement.
7. LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION. Each Party hereto agrees to indemnify
and hold the other Party harmless from any claim, injury, or damages arising out of or connected
with the acts or omissions of such Party or its employees or any activities of such Party
contemplated under the terms of this Agreement. Each Party agrees to obtain and maintain general
liability and property damage insurance, or similar coverage, during the term of this Agreement
with coverage in amounts deemed adequate by such Party.
8. DURATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement shall continue and remain in
full force and effect, as evidenced by a Permanent Access and Maintenance Easement and
Agreement to be executed and recorded in the Office of the Davis County Recorder to inure and
run with the land. (see exhibit B)
2
9. NO SEPARATE LEGAL ENTITY. No separate legal entity is created by the
terms of this Agreement. To the extent that this Agreement requires administration other than as
set forth herein, it shall be administered by the Manager(s) or Administrator(s) of Fruit Heights
City and the Community and Economic Development Director of Davis County, acting as a joint
board. There shall be no real or personal property acquired jointly by the Parties as a result of this
Agreement.
10. ATTORNEY REVIEW. This Agreement shall be submitted to the authorized
attorney for each Party for review in accordance with § 11-13-202.5 of the Utah Code Annotated,
1953, as amended.
11. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this Agreement is held unenforceable or
invalid for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions hereof shall
continue in full force and effect.
12. THIRD PARTIES. This Agreement is not intended to benefit any person or entity
not named as a Party hereto.
13. BREACH. If any Party fails to perform its obligations hereunder or to comply
with the terms hereof, the non-defaulting Party shall have all rights and remedies available at law
and/or in equity.
14. COOPERATION. It is the intent and desire of the Parties hereto to cooperate in
carrying out the terms of this Agreement in order to achieve a coordinated maintenance of Pond G
as set forth in this Agreement and to minimize disruption and unnecessary expense for the Parties
hereto.
15. PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITY. Officers and employees performing services
pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed to be officers and employees of the Party employing
their services even if performing functions outside of the territorial limits of such Party, and shall
be deemed officers and employees of such party under the provisions of the Utah Governmental
Immunity Act. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to waive any of the privileges and
immunities available to any of the Parties under the Governmental Immunity Act as set forth in §§
63G-7-101, et. seq. of the Utah Code Ann., as amended.
16. RESOLUTION. The governing body of each of the Parties hereto shall adopt a
resolution authorizing said Party to enter into this Agreement and copy of such resolution shall be
attached hereto and by this reference be made a part hereof.
17. AMENDMENT. This Agreement may be amended only in writing signed by the
Parties hereto.
3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement by and
through their respective, duly authorized representatives as of the day and year first hereinabove
written.
FRUIT HEIGHTS CITY
ATTEST:
By: By:
Brandon Green, City Recorder John Pohlman, Mayor
DAVIS COUNTY
ATTEST:
By: By:
Curtis Koch, Randy B. Elliott
Davis County Clerk/Auditor Chair, Board of Davis County Commissioners
Reviewed as to Proper Form and Reviewed as to Proper Form and
Compliance with Applicable Law: Compliance with Applicable Law:
Fruit Heights City Attorney Davis County Attorney’s Office
4
WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO:
Davis County
PO Box 618 Exhibit “A”
Farmington, Utah 84025
Also:
Fruit Heights City
910 South Mountain Road
Fruit Heights, Utah 84037
Quit Claim Deed
(COUNTY) Tax ID No. 07-080-0129
Davis County PIN No. 13821
Project No. S-0089(406)398
Parcel No. 0089:297:C
Davis County , a body corporate and politic of the State of Utah, Grantor, hereby QUIT
CLAIMS to Fruit Heights City, Grantee, at 910 South Mountain Road, Fruit Heights City, Utah
84037, for the sum of TEN ($10.00) Dollars, and other good and valuable
considerations, the following described parcel of land in Davis County, State of Utah, to-wit:
A parcel of land in fee, being part of an entire tract of property, situate in the SW1/4 NW1/4
Section 1, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, for the widening of
existing US-89, known as Project No. S-0089(406)398. The boundaries of said parcel of land
are described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the southerly boundary line of said entire tract and the westerly
right of way line of a frontage road of said Project, which point is 711.91 feet East along the
Quarter Section line from the West Quarter corner of said Section 1; and running thence along
said southerly boundary line the following three (3) courses and distances: (1) West 3.50 feet;
(2) thence N.00°02'52"W. (Record N.00°00'09"E.) 10.00 feet to a fence corner and land
conveyed in Quit Claim Deed recorded as Entry No. 1475457 of the official records of the
Davis County Recorder; (3) thence N.89°59’57”W. (Record N.89°56'56"W.) 167.05 feet along
said Quit Claim Deed and existing fence line to a point 317.94 feet radially distant westerly
from the US-89 right of way control line of said Project, opposite approximate Engineers
Station 1090+42.77; thence N.00°23'17"W. 166.85 feet to a point of curvature of a curve to the
left with a radius of 4800.00 feet at a point 315.29 feet radially distant westerly from the US-
89 right of way control line of said Project, opposite Engineers Station 1092+16.85; thence
northerly along said curve with an arc length of 260.50 feet, chord bears N.01°56'34"W. 260.47
feet to a point 310.87 feet radially distant westerly from the US-89 right of way control line of
said Project, opposite Engineers Station 1094+85.74; thence S.86°30'13"W. 40.00 feet to a
point 350.87 feet perpendicularly distant westerly from the US-89 right of way control line of
said Project, opposite Engineers Station 1094+85.74; thence N.03°29'47"W. 310.00 feet
Continued on Page 2
COUNTY RW-05CO (12-01-03)
Page 2 PIN No. 13821
Project No. S-0089(406)398
Parcel No. 0089:297:C
parallel with said right of way control line to a point 350.87 feet perpendicularly distant westerly
from the US-89 right of way control line of said Project, opposite Engineers Station 1097+95.74;
thence N.86°30'13"E. 210.50 feet to said westerly right of way line of a frontage road of said
Project at a point 140.37 feet perpendicularly distant westerly from the US-89 right of way
control line of said Project, opposite approximate Engineers Station 1097+95.74; thence along
said westerly right of way line the following three (3) courses and distances: (1) S.03°29'47"E.
310.11 feet to a point of curvature of a curve to the right with a radius of 4970.50 feet; (2) thence
southerly along said curve with an arc length of 269.64 feet, chord bears S.01°56'32"E. 269.61
feet; (3) thence S.00°23'17"E. 178.00 feet to the point of beginning as shown on the official
map of said project on file in the office of the Utah Department of Transportation.
The above described parcel of land contains 139,038 square feet in area or 3.192 acres.
(Note: Rotate above bearings 00°07’41” clockwise to equal NAD83 Highway bearings)
Continued on Page 3
COUNTY RW-05CO (12-01-03)
Page 3 PIN No. 13821
Project No. S-0089(406)398
Parcel No. 0089:297:C
This instrument is made in pursuance of a sale of said real property, authorized by an
order of the Board of County Commissioners of said County, made on the day of
, A.D. 20 , and vesting in the Grantee all of the title in said real property.
DAVIS COUNTY DAVIS COUNTY
______________________ ______________________
Curtis Koch Randy B. Elliott, Chair
Davis County Clerk/Auditor Davis County Commission
Reviewed and Advised as to ATTEST:
Form and Legality
___________________________ ___________________________
Michael Kendall Curtis Koch
Davis County Deputy Attorney Davis County Clerk/Auditor
Acknowledgment
State of Utah )
)§
County of Davis )
On this _______ day of ____________, in the year _____, before me
___________________________, a notary public, personally appeared Curtis Koch and
Randy B. Elliott, proved on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons whose names
are subscribed to in this document, and acknowledged they executed the same in the
capacities as Davis County Clerk/Auditor and Davis County Commissioner/Executive,
respectively.
__________________________________
Notary Public
Prepared by SKP 09/01/2021 (Horrocks Engineers) 43th Partial COUNTY RW-05CO (12-01-03)
Revised by MWW 03/02/2022 (added language per Davis County)
Revised by MWW 07/07/2022 (updated language to signature page per Davis County)
WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO:
Exhibit “B”
Davis County
PO Box 618
Farmington, UT 84025
PERMANENT ACCESS AND
MAINTENANCE EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT
Fruit Heights City, a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, including successors and
assigns, with an address of 910 South Mountain Road, Fruit Heights, Utah 84037 (“Grantor”),
hereby grant and convey to Davis County, a political subdivision of the State of Utah, and its
successors and assigns (“Grantee”), for the sum of Ten and 00/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other
good and valuable consideration, a permanent easement, as set forth herein, over, under, in, along,
across, and upon the following described real property located in Fruit Heights City, Davis County,
State of Utah:
A parcel of land situate in the SW1/4 NW1/4 Section 1, Township 3 North,
Range 1 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, for the widening of existing US-89,
known as Project No. S-0089(406)398. The boundaries of said parcel of land are
described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the southerly boundary line of said entire
tract and the westerly right of way line of a frontage road of said Project, which
point is 711.91 feet East along the Quarter Section line from the West Quarter
corner of said Section 1; and running thence along said southerly boundary line the
following three (3) courses and distances: (1) West 3.50 feet; (2) thence
N.00°02'52"W. (Record N.00°00'09"E.) 10.00 feet to a fence corner and land
conveyed in Quit Claim Deed recorded as Entry No. 1475457 of the official records
of the Davis County Recorder; (3) thence N.89°59’57”W. (Record N.89°56'56"W.)
167.05 feet along said Quit Claim Deed and existing fence line to a point 317.94
feet radially distant westerly from the US-89 right of way control line of said
Project, opposite approximate Engineers Station 1090+42.77; thence
N.00°23'17"W. 166.85 feet to a point of curvature of a curve to the left with a radius
of 4800.00 feet at a point 315.29 feet radially distant westerly from the US-89 right
of way control line of said Project, opposite Engineers Station 1092+16.85; thence
northerly along said curve with an arc length of 260.50 feet, chord bears
N.01°56'34"W. 260.47 feet to a point 310.87 feet radially distant westerly from the
US-89 right of way control line of said Project, opposite Engineers Station
1094+85.74; thence S.86°30'13"W. 40.00 feet to a point 350.87 feet
perpendicularly distant westerly from the US-89 right of way control line of said
Project, opposite Engineers Station 1094+85.74; thence N.03°29'47"W. 310.00 feet
parallel with said right of way control line to a point 350.87 feet perpendicularly
distant westerly from the US-89 right of way control line of said Project, opposite
Engineers Station 1097+95.74; thence N.86°30'13"E. 210.50 feet to said westerly
Permanent Access and Maintenance Easement and Agreement Page 1 of 4
Version: 09.27.22
right of way line of a frontage road of said Project at a point 140.37 feet
perpendicularly distant westerly from the US-89 right of way control line of said
Project, opposite approximate Engineers Station 1097+95.74; thence along said
westerly right of way line the following three (3) courses and distances: (1)
S.03°29'47"E. 310.11 feet to a point of curvature of a curve to the right with a radius
of 4970.50 feet; (2) thence southerly along said curve with an arc length of 269.64
feet, chord bears S.01°56'32"E. 269.61 feet; (3) thence S.00°23'17"E. 178.00 feet
to the point of beginning as shown on the official map of said project on file in the
office of the Utah Department of Transportation. Also, known as Pond G.
The above described parcel of land contains 139,038 square feet in area or 3.192
acres.
(Note: Rotate above bearings 00°07’41” clockwise to equal NAD83 Highway
bearings)
Part of Tax ID 07-080-0129
The permanent easement granted and conveyed by this instrument shall include the right,
privilege, and authority for Grantee, its employees, agents, and contractors, to install and maintain
all landscaping elements including the installation of grass, irrigation, or other landscaping
elements required in order to incorporate Pond G into the driving range at Davis Park Golf Course;
together with the right of Grantee, its employees, agents, and contractors, to mow, apply fertilize
and weed control, and to cut and remove from said easement any trees or other obstructions which
may endanger the safety or interfere with the use of said access, or appurtenances attached to or
connected therewith; together with the right of ingress and egress to and over said above-described
premises at any and all times for the purpose of golf ball retrieval, patrolling or repairing, renewing,
excavating, inspecting, or maintaining, the landscaping and appurtenances, and for doing anything
necessary, useful, or convenient for the enjoyment of the easement hereby granted.
The permanent easement granted and conveyed by this instrument shall further include the
right, privilege, and authority to Grantee, its employees, agents, and contractors, to ingress and
egress, of any kind or nature, over said above-described premises, at any and all times for the
purpose of constructing, inspecting, maintaining, or reconstructing the facilities or otherwise,
including access to Grantee abutting property.
Grantee agrees it will not disturb the grading without prior written consent from the
Grantor. Grantee acknowledges that the primary purpose of Pond G is to detain storm water, and
any other purpose is secondary to the primary purpose.
Grantor shall have the sole responsibility to maintain the storm water infrastructure coming
into and out of Pond G.
Grantor shall at all times, upon reasonable notice from Grantee, its employees, agents, and
contractors, remove any surface obstructions or open gates that would otherwise prevent the
Permanent Access and Maintenance Easement and Agreement Page 2 of 4
Version: 09.27.22
ingress or egress of Grantee, its employees, agents, and contractors, or Grantee’s use or enjoyment
of this permanent easement.
WITNESS the hand of Grantor(s) this ______ day of _________, 20___.
FRUIT HEIGHTS CITY
ATTEST:
___________________________ _________________________________
By: Brandon Green By: John Pohlman
City Recorder, Fruit Heights Mayor, Fruit Heights City
STATE OF UTAH )
) ss
COUNTY OF DAVIS )
On this _______ day of ____________, in the year 20___, before me
____________________________, a notary public, personally appeared Brandon Green and John
Pohlman, proved on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons whose names are
subscribed to in this document, and acknowledged they executed the same in the capacities as Fruit
Heights City Recorder and Fruit Heights City Mayor, respectively.
Notary Public
Permanent Access and Maintenance Easement and Agreement Page 3 of 4
Version: 09.27.22
WITNESS the hand of Grantee(s) this ______ day of _________, 20___.
DAVIS COUNTY
Randy B. Elliott Curtis Koch
Chair, Board of Davis County Commissioners Davis County Clerk/Auditor
ATTEST:
Curtis Koch
Davis County Clerk/Auditor
STATE OF UTAH )
) ss
COUNTY OF DAVIS )
On this _______ day of ____________, in the year 20___, before me
____________________________, a notary public, personally appeared Curtis Koch and Randy
B. Elliott, proved on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons whose names are
subscribed to in this document, and acknowledged they executed the same in the capacities as
Davis County Clerk/Auditor and Davis County Commissioner/Executive, respectively.
_________________________________
Notary Public
Reviewed and Advised as to Form and Legality:
Davis County Attorney’s Office
Permanent Access and Maintenance Easement and Agreement Page 4 of 4
Version: 09.27.22
.40 '
1 2 6
0" E 0
6'0
23 '0
1°
5°5
N7
S2
"E
N 18°37'00" W
93.00'
BA S
E AT
GR IN
E NGIN
NC
I EE
R I NG
5.1
16
N 69°27'25" E
4' 25.11'
N 24°16'00" E
35.05' ∆
S2
5°5
∆
6'0
0"
E
∆ = 120°00'16"
R = 55.00'
L = 115.20' ∆
LC = 95.26' 15
N 5°43'43" W 7'
2.2
N
35 '
°4 0 5 .11
34 2
3'
10
"W
8. 4 W
2"
7'
1°02'2
S7
5746 South 1475 East Ogden, Utah 84403
Main (801)394-4515 S.L.C (801)521-0222 Fax (801)392-7544
W W W . G R E A T B A S I N E N G I N E E R I N G . C O M
✔
11/23/2022
C lark R. Moss & Eileen S. Moss
1394 Baer C anyon Rd.
Fruit Heights, Ut 84037
801-721-9375
emsmoss@ comcast.net
Baer C anyon Estates phase 3
1394 Baer C anyon Rd. Lots 9, 8, and 7
1157700008, 11286007,
115770009
Adjust lot lines
11-23-2022
11-25-2022
Section 6.12.060 Number Of Dogs And Cats Per Residence
No person or persons at any one (1) residence within the jurisdiction of this title shall at any one
(1) time own, harbor, license, or maintain more than three (3) cats and dogs in any combination.
A person may only own, harbor, license, or maintain three (3) dogs if one of the dogs has been
acquired from a legitimate animal shelter, as the term "animal shelter" is defined in the Utah
Animal Welfare Act. The Animal Control Division may issue a permit to owners of Dogs and
Cats to keep up to four Dogs or Cats (but not more than four Household Pets) in a residential
area.
Section X Exemptions for number of dogs and cats per residence:
The provisions of Section 6.12.060 shall not apply to the following:
a. Under the provisions of Section 10-8-65, Utah Code Annotated, a person may keep
a service animal, a retired service animal, or both in addition to that limit. See
“service animal” as defined in 06.04.010 (AB) Definitions. A exemption shall be
issued for such dog upon the filing of an affidavit with the county showing that the
dog qualifies for exemption;
a.b. Dogs especially trained to assist officials of governmental agencies in the
performance of their duties, and which are owned or maintained by such agencies. A
exemption shall be issued for such dog upon the filing of an affidavit with the county
showing that the dog qualifies for exemption.
(Ord. No. 8-2011, § 3, Amended 12/20/2011; Ord. 7-1992 § 3.06)
Get email alerts for Fruit Heights
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.