City Council
Regular MeetingGallup, NM · July 9, 2019
Minutes
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Gallup City Council, City of Gallup, New Mexico,
held in the Council Chambers at Gallup City Hall, 110 West Aztec Avenue, at 6:00 p.m.
on Tuesday, July 9, 2019.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Jackie McKinney.
Upon roll call, the following were present:
Mayor: Jackie McKinney
Councilors: Allan Landavazo
Yogash Kumar
Fran Palochak
Absent: Linda Garcia, Councilor
Also present: Jon DeYoung, Assistant City Manager
Curtis Hayes, City Attorney
Mayor McKinney said Councilor Garcia’s absence shall be recorded as an excused
absence.
Presented to the Mayor and Councilors for their approval were the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of June 25, 2019.
Councilor Palochak made the motion to approve the aforementioned minutes. Seconded
by Councilor Kumar. Roll call: Councilors Palochak, Kumar and Mayor McKinney all
voted yes. Councilor Landavazo abstained. Motion carried.
Presented to the Mayor and Councilors for their approval were the following
Discussion/Action Topics:
1. Request for Street and Roadway Closures for the Gallup Inter-Tribal Indian
Ceremonial Parades and 5K Run/Walk Hilda Bowman, Gallup Inter-Tribal
—
Indian Ceremonial
Ms. Bowman presented the request as well as an overview of the events. She answered
questions regarding the request for the closure of Mendoza Road for the 5K Run/Walk to
be held on August 3, 2019. Due to the increased participation at the 5K Run/Walk and
for safety reasons, Ms. Bowman said this is the first year they are requesting full closure
of the road.
Chief Franklin Boyd, Gallup Police Department, provided an overview of the services
provided by the Police Department for the 5K Run/Walk. He also pointed out that part of
the roadway is in the county. Mayor McKinney asked Ms. Bowman to request permission
from the County to close Mendoza Road for the 5K Run/Walk.
MINUTES
Regular City Council Meeting — 7/9/2019
Page 2
Discussion followed regarding the new route for the parades, including the newspaper
and radio advertisements for advising the public about the new route and the reason for
changing the route for the parades. The route and the event logistics for the 5K Run/Walk
were also discussed
Councilor Palochak said she has participated in the 5K Run/Walk in the past and spoke
in favor of the full closure of Mendoza Road for safety reasons.
Following discussion, Councilor Palochak made the motion to approve the request for
street and roadway closures for the Gallup Inter-Tribal Indian Ceremonial Parades and
5K Run/Walk. Seconded by Councilor Landavazo. RoIl call: Councilors Palochak,
Landavazo, Kumar and Mayor McKinney all voted yes.
2. Request for a Budget Adjustment in the Amount of $30,000 for Two
Construction Projects Eric Babcock, Interim Electric Director
—
Mr. Babcock presented the request for the $30,000 budget adjustment from Fund 507.
An additional $1,500 is needed for the first project to remove and replace contaminated
asphalt behind one of the utility buildings where electrical transformers were stored.
$25,000 is needed for the second project, which is currently unfunded, to construct a 20’
x 20’ containment area to hold out-of-service electrical transformers. The transformers
will be placed in haz-mat bags and stored in the new containment area when the project
is completed. An additional $3,500 is needed for contingencies for the second project.
Mr. Babcock answered questions regarding the parking lot where the contaminated
asphalt is located and the City’s plan to recycle old electrical transformers in the future.
Councilor Landavazo made the motion to approve the request for a budget adjustment in
the amount of $30,000 for two Electric Department construction projects as presented.
Seconded by Councilor Palochak. Roll call: Councilors Landavazo, Palochak, Kumar
and Mayor McKinney all voted yes.
3. Ordinance No. C2019-7; Amendment to the Lodgers Tax Ordinance — Curtis
Hayes, City Attorney
Mr. Hayes said the New Mexico Legislature amended the State’s Lodgers Tax Act earlier
this year to remove the lodgers tax exemption for premises having less than three rooms
or three other units of accommodation. Previously, facilities such as short-term rentals
(less than 30 days) with less than three rooms, were exempt from having to pay lodgers
tax to a municipality or county. The proposed ordinance is based on the amendment to
the State Lodgers Tax Act. The proposed ordinance would become effective on January
1, 2020 and would allow the City to begin imposing lodgers tax on facilities having less
MINUTES
Regular City Council Meeting — 7/9/2019
Page 3
than three rooms or three other units of accommodation. Mr. Hayes also recommended
that the City enter into an agreement with Airbnb to charge lodgers tax on behalf of the
City in the future. Mr. Hayes and Clyde (C.B.) Strain, Planning and Development Director,
answered questions regarding the enforcement of the City’s ordinances pertaining to
Airbns or short-term rentals in the city. They also provided information on property owners
who are advertising their properties on websites for short-term rental claiming to rent their
properties for a long period of time (more than 30 days) to avoid compliance with City
regulations.
Councilor Landavazo made the motion to approve Ordinance No. C201 9-7; Amendment
to the Lodgers Tax Ordinance. Seconded by Councilor Palochak. Roll call: Councilors
Landavazo, Palochak, Kumar and Mayor McKinney all voted yes.
4. Approval of Contract with American Medical Response — Curtis Hayes, City
Attorney
Mr. Hayes said the Gallup Fire Department serves as the backup ambulance service for
Med-Star, which is now part of American Medical Response (AMR). Although the Fire
Department does not need a license (referred to as a certificate of necessity) from the
New Mexico Public Regulation Commission (PRC), it cannot get reimbursed from
insurance providers without the certificate of necessity. The Fire Department has an
application for a certificate of necessity pending with the PRC; however, AMR has offered
to allow the Fire Department to operate under its license as a subcontractor and will take
care of the billing process for a 20% fee. lithe Fire Department were to obtain a certificate
of necessity from the PRC, it would have to contract with a billing company and pay a
similar fee. The proposed agreement also provides for AMR to reimburse the Fire
Department for calls when a Fire Department EMT rides in a Med Star Ambulance while
transporting a patient to the hospital. AMR would also reimburse the Fire Department a
flat $50 fee when the Fire Department responds to a call at Med-Star’s request which
does not result in a transport. Mr. Hayes responded to questions concerning the liability
of both parties of the agreement.
Michael Hoffman, Assistant Chief, Gallup Fire Department, said both parties will work
together as they have done in the past; however, the Fire Department wilt be able to get
reimbursed for its services under the proposed agreement. Discussion followed
regarding the practices of both parties in responding to calls for indigent care in which
they may not get reimbursed.
Following discussion, Councilor Kumar made the motion to approve the contract with
American Medical Response. Seconded by Councilor Palochak. Roll call: Councilors
Kumar, Palochak, Landavazo and Mayor McKinney all voted yes.
MINUTES
Regular City Council Meeting — 7/9/2019
Page 4
Presented to the Mayor and Councilors was the following Presentation and Information
item:
1. Presentation: Plastic Bag Ordinance — Curtis Hayes, City Attorney
Mr. Hayes presented the results of a survey conducted through Survey Monkey to gather
input from the community on whether to ban single use plastic bags. A copy of the survey
questions and results are attached hereto, marked as Exhibit A and made a part of these
official Minutes.
Discussion followed regarding the Mayor and Councilors’ position on whether to ban
single use plastic bags, whether to impose the use of heavier plastic bags or paper bags
as an alternative, the public’s ability to adapt to new regulations, the amount of the tax or
fee to charge for the use of heavier plastic bags or paper bags if imposed, a
recommendation to ban plastic straws, the Mayor’s opposition to government mandates
on the private sector, the problem with litter in the community and the need for public
education to encourage people not to litter.
Chief Boyd answered questions regarding the enforcement of the City’s ordinance
prohibiting littering. Mayor McKinney instructed Chief Boyd to advise police officers to
issue citations to those who litter.
Mayor McKinney asked the Councilors to contact the City Manager and City Attorney if
they want to pursue an action item to ban single use plastic bags.
Comments by Public on Non-Agenda Items
Justin Benson said the Business Improvement District (BID) Ordinance requires the BID’s
Management Committee to submit an operation plan for the BID to the City Council within
120 days following the adoption of the ordinance last November. He asked the Mayor
and Councilors to hold the BID accountable by requiring them to submit the operation
plan as mandated by the Ordinance. Mayor McKinney asked Mr. DeYoung to advise the
BID Board at their next meeting to comply with the requirements of the BID Ordinance
and to submit the operation plan to the City Council.
Comments by Mayor and City Councilors
Councilor Palochak commented on the dedication of the ball fields in honor of David
“Amos” Schmaltz last weekend and the beautiful artwork of the memorial which was done
by Prentice Archuleta.
Councilor Landavazo commended the Solid Waste, Parks and Recreation and Public
Works Departments for their work during the community cleanup on the east side of town
MINUTES
Regular City Council Meeting — 7/9)2019
Page 5
last weekend. He also commended City staff and local organizations for their work in
hosting the Best of the Best Rodeo which was very successful. Councilor Landavazo
advised Patty Holland, Chief Financial Officer, that a line item for contingency is needed
in the budget for additional help at the rodeo due to the increased growth of the event.
Councilor Kumar said he hoped everyone enjoyed the Independence Day holiday and
looks forward to the Wild Thing Bull Riding event this weekend.
Mayor McKinney commented on his invitation and attendance at the 50th Gallup High
School reunion that was held recently. The reunion committee invited the Pink Flamingos
from Albuquerque to their event as they function to promote the arts with the youth of the
community. He provided information about the Pink Flamingos to Tammi Moe, Library
Director, for a potential event to be held in the future. Mayor McKinney commented on
the improvements made by Murphy Builders on the drainage at the southeastern portion
of the golf course to correct problems with flooding which usually occurs during the
monsoon season. He asked Matthew Alcala, Director of Golf, to have the piles of
construction debris removed from the area near Hole #16. Mayor McKinney encouraged
everyone to attend the Wild Thing Bull Riding event.
Comments by City Manager and City Attorney
At the request of Mr. DeYoung, Mr. Babcock provided information concerning a planned
electrical outage to allow City crews to make improvements to the Mendoza substation.
There will be one fifteen minute outage on July 22uid to bring the substation offline and to
reroute power distribution. There will be another fifteen minute outage to bring the
substation back online on July 23td
Mayor McKinney commented on the increased growth of the Best of the Best Rodeo and
the impact the event has on the community.
There being no further business, Councilor Palochak made the motion to adjourn the
meeting. Seconded by Councilor Kumar. Roll call: Councilors Palochak, Kumar,
Landavazo and Mayor McKinney all voted yes.
Jackie McKinney, Mayor
Approved 7/23/2019
EXHIBIT A
Plastic Bag Ordinance
QI Some cities and the state of California have banned the use of single
use high density polyethylene (HDPE) plastic bags by most businesses.
Arguments in favor of such bans include: Plastic bags are a large portion
of visible litter. Plastic bags are rarely recycled. Plastic bags are harmful
to birds and marine life. The alternatives, such as heavy plastic or paper
bags, cost only pennies more and are less likely to end up as litter.
Arguments against such bans include: Single use bags are recyclable.
Plastic bags are less than 1 % of landfill waste. While there is significant
research showing harm to marine life, the research on the harm to birds
is less conclusive. The alternatives are 2-15 times more expensive and
they could also end up as litter. Should the City of Gallup institute a ban
on the use of high density polyethylene (HDPE) for most businesses?
Answered: 126 Skipped: 0
Yes 73.02%
No 26.98%
0% 70% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 700%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes 73.02% 92
No 26.98% 34
Total Respondents: 126
1/7
Plastic Bag Ordinance
Q2 Prior to imposing a state-wide ban on single use bags in 2016,
California required that retailers with more than 10,000 square feet and a
licensed pharmacy and supermarkets, take in single use bags for
recycling.Should the City of Gallup require large retailers that use single
use plastic bags to accept them for recycling rather that instituting a ban
on single use plastic bags?
Answered 124 Skipped: 2
No
0% 70% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 700%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes 53.23% 66
No 46.77% 58
TOTAL 124
2/7
Plastic Bag Ordinance
Q3 Single use “bioplastic” bags can be manufactured from starches or
polylactic acid (PLA), often called “corn plastics” as corn is often used in
their manufacture. Arguments in favor of using bioplastics instead of
HDPE include: That they are manufactured using a renewable resource.
They are compostable (however only in commercial composting landfills
which are relatively uncommon). They are as harmful to birds and marine
life. Arguments against their use include: That they are more expensive.
That manufacturing process requires the use of energy produced by non
renewable resources. They are just as likely to end up as litter. Should
the City of Gallup require large retailers that use single use bags to use
“bioplastic” bags rather than HDPE plastic bags?
Answered: 126 Skipped: 0
69.84%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes 30.16% 38
No 69.84% 88
TOTAL 126
317
Plastic Bag Ordinance
Q4 The bans that have be instituted in other parts of the country generally
exempt some businesses from the ban. Common exemptions include:
Businesses under a certain size based on either square footage or gross
sales, restaurants, take-out food establishments, and farmers’ markets
and non-profit organizations.lf the City of Gallup adopts a ban on single
use plastic bags, which businesses, if any, should be exempt from the
ban?
Answered 71 Skipped: 55
Restaurants I
45.07%
Take-Out Foo...
Non-Profit I
33.80%
Organizations
Farmer’s 27 .13%
Markets
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Restaurants I Take-Out Food Establishments 45.07% 32
Non-Profit Organizations 33.80% 24
Farmer’s Markets 21.13% 15
TOTAL 71
4/7
Question 4: Showing 45 responses
F
Reusable bags across the board.
No expemption
No exceptions!
no one should be exempt
none
None
grocery stores
Flea market
None all should be required to use alternatives like paper.
-
No business unless we figure out how to recycle all to that place in SLC
Utah
No one should be exempt
All
Pharmacies, non-profits, farmer’s markets
all should be included
No one should be exempt
None
none. no bags PERIOD!!!!!
No exemptions. Ban plastic bags!
No exemptions
No exemptions
none
All of the above
Small businesses
Grocery stores
No exemptions
none
general mdse.
none
all, for the love of god please don’t ban plastic bags.
none of them
All businesses should be enforced to recycle or not use HDPE bags
None, though non-profits should be able to reuse already existing plastic
bags.
This ban is stupid. Don’t require businesses to use a certain type of bag.
none
Small businesses
If you are going to exempt one organization, you should exempt them
all. Why do we have to follow what some of the other cities in the
country do? This is another way the California legislature are able to add
another tax on its citizens under the fake feel good policy of I am saving
the environment. How can this be good for the environment if some, but
not all are following the rules. There is always someone more influential
who will be exempt because of who they are or who they know while
those of us who are the little guy will get to bear the burden for them.
Everyone
All of the above
Large retailers
Don’t ban any plastic bags
All listed categories
All three of these.
No business should be exempt
No business should be exempt
N/A
Plastic Bag Ordinance
Q5 The bans that have be instituted in other parts of the country generally
exempt some products from the ban. Common exemptions include: Food
products such as unwrapped produce and meats where the product
touches the bag, dry cleaning and laundry, alcohol, medications,
newspapers, phone books, other “door hanger” items. lithe City of
Gallup adopts a ban on single use plastic bags, which products, if any,
should be exempt from the ban?
Answered: 80 Skipped 46
Food Products 62.50%
ALcohol 7.25%
Dry Cleaning I
21.25%
Laundry
Pharmacy I
75 00%
Medications
0% 70% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Food Products 62.50% 50
Alcohol 1.25% 1
Dry Cleaning/Laundry 21.25% 17
Pharmacy / Medications 15.00% 12
TOTAL 80
517
Question 5: Showing 41 responses
F
America did quiet well with out plastics.
None
None
And Dry Cleaning/Laundry
None
For things like raw meat or ice, not necessarily all food products.
NONE, we are out of time to truly do something for the present and
future
No one should be exempt
None
All
dry cleaning, food products
None
all should be included
No one should be exempt
None. Eradicate ALL !!!
None
I’m not sure about this.
newspapers
none
none
All above
Why ban bags, why not ban all the trash thrown on the roads like beer
cartons!
No exemptions
none
no ban
none
all
none of them
none
ALL
none
Why can’t I choose more than one option on this question?
Restraunt
Exempt them all. If you exempt some, but not all products, we will have
to have a long, confusing list of what will and what will not be allowed.
There should not be a ban on these plastics, period. When you decide to
add an additional cost for using the bags that are allowed, we are being
punished twice. We have to pay for those who are exempt because of
who they are. What about those who can little afford food, much a bag
to carry it in? You will tax the business who will pass it on to us. Cloth
bags will cause illness. Not everyone washes their shopping bags after
every use. We were asked (told) a few years ago to stop using paper, it
will save the trees. Now we have to stop using plastic, it will save the
birds. When will we start caring about the PEOPLE? If you charge a tax
and it goes to the city, what will you do with it?
Meat only
All
All of the above
Don’t turn us into California
All of these.
None of these should be exempt
n/a
Plastic Bag Ordinance
Q6 Some cities that have adopted a ban have also instituted a fee system
whereby customers of certain businesses are charged a fee, most
commonly $0.10. Arguments in favor of such a lee include: It encourages
use of customer provided bags. It offsets additional cost to merchants to
use heavier plastic bags or paper bags. Additional cost to customers is
minimal and SNAP/WIC customers can be exempted. There is very little
research that shows any negative health consequences associated with
reusable bags and washing eliminates the germs. Arguments against fee
systems include: It discriminates against the poor. Research shows that
reusable bags are germ laden. It adds administrative burden to
merchants to track the fee. It is slower for checkout personnel to use
customer provided bags. lithe City of Gallup adopts a ban on single use
plastic bags, should it also adopt a fee system whereby certain business
would be required to charge a lee to the customer for a bag or container
that is supplied by the business?
Answered: 126 Skipped 0
48.47%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 700%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes 48.41% 61
No 51.59% 65
TOTAL 126
617
Plastic Bag Ordinance
Q7 A few cities that have adopted a fee system have the lee that is
collected from customers go to the city rather than the merchant. It is
essentially a tax on the use of merchant provided bags. The arguments
for and against such a tax include the arguments for and against a fee
system where the merchant keeps the fee. An additional argument for a
tax on merchant provided bags is that the city can use the money to
provide free reusable bags to consumers and for other anti-litter and
recycling efforts. An additional argument against a tax on merchant
provided bags is that it is raising taxes and that business are bearing the
additional cost of providing alternative types of bags to customers.lf the
City of Gallup adopts a ban on single use plastic bags, should it also
adopt a tax whereby certain business would be required to charge a tax
to the customer for a bag or container that is supplied by the business?
Answered 126 Skipped: 0
65.08%
0% 70% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes 34.92% 44
No 65.08% 82
TOTAL 126
7/7
Get email alerts for Gallup
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.