Planning and Zoning

Planning and Development Clyde “C.B.” Strain, Director PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA Wednesday, January 8th, 2020, 6:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers *** Call to Order / Roll Call *** Approval of December 11th, 2019 Meeting Minutes PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM ONE: CASE # 19-00300002: Request by Joe DiGregorio, Six D., Inc, property owner, for Final Plat approval of a Minor Subdivision; Christine Subdivision Replat No. 1 of Block 4, Lebeck-Atkins Subdivision. Said property is generally located Northeast of Marguerite Street and Aztec Avenue (209 Marguerite Street, 1808 & 1820 W. Aztec Avenue); containing 3.8132 acres M/L. ITEM TWO: CASE # 20-00900001: City initiated request to amend Title 10 “Land Development Standards” of the Municipal Code of the City of Gallup Section 10-2-B-a “Residential” and Section 10-2-B-c “Non-Residential”; Tables 10-2-2, 10-2-4, 10-2-6, 10-2-8, 10- 2-19 and 10-2-21. Add side street yard requirements for corner lots within the Rural Residential (RR), Single-Family Residential (SFR-A, B & C), Multi-Family Residential Low (MFRL), Multi- Family Residential Medium (MFRM), General Commercial (GC) and Heavy Commercial (HC) Zone Districts. Establish ten foot (10’) side street yard setbacks for SFR-A & B, MFRL, MFRM and GC and fifteen foot (15’) side street yard setbacks for RR, SFR-C and HC. This item will go before City Council for final approval on January 28, 2020. ITEM THREE: CASE # 20-01100001: Annual Open Meetings Act, Resolution No. RP2020-01. The Open Meetings Act requires that the Planning and Zoning Commission (at least) annually review what constitutes reasonable notice to the public of its meetings. Accordingly, the resolution is presented to the Board for consideration and approval. INFORMATION ITEMS ITEM FOUR: City Council Actions Taken ITEM FIVE: P&Z Commissioner Attendance 2019 ITEM SIX: December 2019 Building Permit Activity Report ITEM SEVEN: Building Permit Five-Year Comparison {2015 thru 2019} ITEM EIGHT: Planning & Zoning Agenda Five-Year Activity Report {2015 thru 2019} *** Open Floor *** Adjourn 110 West Aztec Avenue • Gallup, New Mexico 87301 • phone 505.863.1240 • email cstrain@gallupnm.gov  Planning & Zoning Commission December 11th, 2019 Minutes City Council Chambers The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Chairman Kent Wilson. Upon roll call, the following were present: Chairman K. Wilson Commissioner F. Pawlowski Commissioner M. Long Commissioner L. Miller Commissioner J. Cresto Upon roll call, the following were absent: Commissioner K. Mackenzie-Chavez Commissioner J. Dooley Chairman Wilson asked if any Commissioner had a conflict of interest for any agenda item and if so to recuse him/herself prior to discussing the particular item. Upon roll call, the following votes were: Chairman K. Wilson (No) Commissioner F. Pawlowski (No) Commissioner M. Long (No) Commissioner L. Miller (No) Commissioner J. Cresto (No) Presented to the Chairman and Commissioners for their approval were the minutes of the November 13th, 2019 regular meeting. Commissioner Pawlowski motioned for approval of the minutes as presented. Seconded by Commissioner Cresto. Motion Carried. Upon roll call, the following votes were: Commissioner F. Pawlowski (Yes) Commissioner J. Cresto (Yes) Commissioner M. Long (Yes) Commissioner L. Miller (Yes) Chairman Wilson administered the oath required by State Law for public forum. Chairman Wilson stated anyone wishing to speak limit their comments to three minutes and not to duplicate a previous point; they will have one opportunity to testify. Prior to the discussion of Item One, Commissioner Dooley arrived and stated that she had no conflict of interest with any agenda item. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting December 11th, 2019 Page 1 of 7 ITEM ONE: CASE # 19-00600005: Request by Kory Cash, Cash Properties on behalf of Fuhs Industrial Park, LLC, (previous) property owner, for the Rezoning of approximately 13.1849 acres FROM Industrial (I) Zone District TO Heavy Commercial (HC) Zone District. The properties are generally located north and south of Boyd Avenue and east and west of Williams Street being described by metes and bounds description. CB Strain began by using the overhead projector to display the GIS Map showing the property’s location. CB explained how the previous property owner, Jack Fuhs started developing the properties around 1973 whereas all the internal streets and utilities were private. CB was unsure as to when the properties were zoned as Industrial; not sure if it was before or after development had occurred. He spoke about how he thought the intent of the property was for heavier uses related to industrial, but as time went on the uses were more geared towards heavy commercial. CB used the overhead projector to display the GIS Map showing the eight (8) lots and surrounding area’s zoning designations. CB explained how the eight (8) lots were previously zoned industrial park, which was an old zoning designation in the previous code. CB pointed out how the properties to the west and north were zoned as Heavy Commercial (HC). However across the street to the north there was a residential area, which was zoned as Mobile Home Park (MHP). CB explained how they typically wouldn’t want to have an industrial district immediately adjacent to a residential district; best to keep separate being that industrial uses have a large effect on noise, fumes and traffic. CB spoke about how the old code had a provision for the Industrial (I) zone district where it stated that if a use was permitted in a commercial district then it was allowed in the Industrial (I) zone district as a Conditional Use. He explained how this meant anytime a new business wanted to occupy one of the buildings and wasn’t considered an industrial use, the property owner had to apply for a Conditional Use Permit. That permit is a process, which can hold up businesses from immediately occupying a building because they have to wait for the Planning & Zoning Commission’s approval. CB stated that a majority of the uses currently occupying the buildings were permitted in the Heavy Commercial (HC) zone district whereas the most logical thing to do was rezone to Heavy Commercial (HC). When the property owners changed from Mr. Fuhs to Mr. Cash, Cash Properties requested the rezone being that it would make it easier for future businesses to occupy their buildings. CB explained how approving the rezone request would open more permitted uses outright without having to go through a Conditional Use Permit process. In addition it would clean up the zoning designations whereas it would remove the possibility of new heavy industrial uses being placed next to a residential area. CB stated that the zone change is probably what it should have been in the beginning for obvious reasons; he believes there was an error made in the zoning at the time of development. The code requires that applicants own at least fifty one percent (51%) of the property being rezoned and in this case the property owner, Cash Properties owns one hundred percent (100%) of the land. CB read aloud the Zoning Map Amendment Criteria that the property qualified under: 1. There was a mistake in the original mapping of the district for an area and the proposed amendment would correct this mistake. In most instances, a mistake would imply that the district which was applied originally did not correspond well to the character of the existing land use in the area. (CB mentioned how this meant having an Industrial zone district next to Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting December 11th, 2019 Page 2 of 7  a residential area didn’t correspond with adjacent uses). 5. The social, economic or environmental interests of the public good would be better served by the proposed district than the existing one. (CB explained how this meant that the property owners would get more uses out of their property without having to go through a Conditional Use Permit process whereas it would be easier to develop their property). FINDINGS OF CONCLUSION: CB stated that the findings of staff for the proposed request met the Acceptable Grounds for Amending the Official Zoning Map per Section 10-5-B-d-i2 of the City of Gallup Land Development Standards (LDS). CB recommended approval of the rezone; Resolution Number RP2019-11. Commissioner Dooley asked CB if NCI was located on the property in question. CB stated that he was unsure which company it was, but knew there was transitional housing there. There was a brief discussion on how CARE 66 was previously located there and how it was currently managed by NCI. Commissioner Dooley wanted to verify that the transitional housing program was able to remain at the same location with the rezone approval this evening. CB stated yes; they could remain because under the old code they were required to obtain a Conditional Use Permit whereas they’ve already complied. If the rezone was approved to Heavy Commercial (HC) zone district any new transitional housing could occupy the building and surpass the Conditional Use Permit process. Chairman Wilson asked if the new LDS had a distance requirement on how far a heavy commercial or industrial zone district had to be from residential. CB responded no; the code actually allowed commercial and residential to be adjacent. Chairman Wilson spoke about how his concerns of Gallup not having readily available buildings where industrial uses could be placed. If the eight (8) lots were rezoned to the Heavy Commercial (HC) zone district then the Commission would be eliminating industrial uses such as, small manufacturing. CB informed Chairman Wilson that light manufacturing was a permitted use in the Heavy Commercial (HC) zone district. CB explained that heavy manufacturing on the other hand was only permitted in the Industrial (I) zone district. Chairman Wilson asked CB what a machine shop would be classified under. CB responded that it would depend on the scale. Chairman Wilson was concerned that in changing the zoning they would be blocking out future uses for those buildings. CB stated that the rezone would only block out future industrial uses. He explained how it was up to the property owner on what they wanted the zoning designation to be and what zone district would give them the best use out of their property. Commissioner Dooley spoke about how allowing heavy manufacturing in the Industrial (I) zone district would cause possible fumes, odors and waste. She was confused as to why Chairman Wilson was favoring this type of use near a residential area. Chairman Wilson stated that he was just concerned that there weren’t many Industrial (I) zone districts to permit the heavier uses. CB reiterated how Industrial (I) zone districts weren’t typically next to a residential district because those heavy industrial uses created excessive noise, fumes and high traffic. Normally they try to place Industrial (I) districts on the outer portions of a town where they don’t have an adverse impact on the adjacent properties. However, the area in question is right in the middle of town and surrounded by residential and commercial areas. CB spoke about how it was never a problem, but could become Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting December 11th, 2019 Page 3 of 7 one if they got a true industrial use that created a safety hazard. The City wouldn’t be able to control the types of industrial uses because if the Industrial (I) zone district allowed it, the City couldn’t deny it. With the rezone being requested this evening to change from Industrial (I) to Heavy Commercial (HC) it would eliminate those potential future issues. Chairman Wilson asked CB if the Commission approved the rezone to Heavy Commercial (HC) and later a light industrial use wanted to occupy the building; would the Commission be able to do a Conditional Use Permit to allow that type of use. CB responded that it depended on the type of use and if the code allowed it. If the code allowed a light industrial use as a Conditional Use they could, but if it didn’t allow it then it would be denied. CB emphasized that once the properties were rezoned to the Heavy Commercial (HC) zone district the code would only allow the uses permitted in that district; not the uses of other districts. John Fuhs, previous property owner approached the podium and introduced himself. Mr. Fuhs stated that he understood it would be ridiculous to allow the two (2) lots located north of Boyd Avenue to run a twenty four (24) hour industrial use such as, a stamping company. He suggested rezoning all eight (8) lots to Heavy Commercial (HC) and later down the line they could rezone certain parcels to Industrial (I). CB informed Mr. Fuhs that they would be unable to do that because it would be considered spot zoning, which wasn’t allowed by code. CB stated that the eight (8) lots either had to stay as it was, Industrial (I) or be rezoned to Heavy Commercial (HC); not both. Mr. Fuhs reminded the Commission that there were eight (8) lots with separate parcel numbers and taxes whereas they all didn’t need to be zoned the same. CB reiterated that spot zoning was illegal whereas they couldn’t spot zone to suit one specific individual’s needs; it had to be zoned for the benefit of the community as a whole and not the individuals. Commissioner Long explained to Mr. Fuhs that spot zoning was when the adjacent properties were zoned differently whereas the one parcel was different creating inconsistency in the area uses. CB stated that it was up to the new property owner, Cash Properties if they wanted to leave as the Industrial (I) or Heavy Commercial (HC) zone district. If they keep the zoning designation as Industrial they will be very limited on what they can do there. Mr. Fuhs stated that if the Commission approved the rezone to Heavy Commercial (HC) and an industrial use came into town; where would they go where that use was permitted? Chairman Wilson stated that was the point he raised earlier. Chairman Wilson asked the current property owner, Kory Cash to approach the podium to get his take on the issue. Kory Cash, current property owner approached the podium and introduced himself. Mr. Cash stated that when he first looked at putting a new business in those buildings they had a couple of leasees who were not eligible to immediately occupy the building. He then talked to CB about it and was informed that those commercial businesses would require a Conditional Use Permit, which was why he initiated the zone change from Industrial (I) to Heavy Commercial (HC). Most of the uses for those buildings were permitted under the Heavy Commercial (HC) zone district whereas being rezoned would elevate them from having to apply for a Conditional Use Permit every time a new business went into their building. However, Mr. Cash didn’t have a problem leaving the zoning designation as Industrial (I) if the Commission could somehow make it easier for him to allow the same businesses that are currently there. He spoke about how it normally took about thirty (30) days to move a new business in, but if they leave zoned as Industrial (I) they’ll have to request the Commission’s approval whereas it’ll take at least sixty (60) days. Mr. Cash asked if there was a way to speed up the process while also not eliminating some industrial uses inside of Gallup. He stated Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting December 11th, 2019 Page 4 of 7 that he was willing to work with the City of Gallup in any way being that he was new to Gallup. He spoke about how he was from Grants and started a few new businesses in Gallup. Mr. Cash wants to help Gallup and do what’s best for the City; not just what’s best for him. Chairman Wilson stated that since 1973 when the area was first developed it had significantly changed with new schools and other things in the area. If they have industrial manufacturing wanting to come into Gallup they will need to find a place for those businesses to develop and leave this Heavy Commercial (HC), which he thinks makes sense. Chairman Wilson stated that if it worked better for the property owners and they were okay with it being Heavy Commercial (HC) that was their decision. He thanked Mr. Cash for his cooperation and comments. Mr. Fuhs again approached the podium and asked if they would be able to change some lots to Heavy Commercial (HC) and some to Industrial (I). CB stated no. Chairman Wilson added that the zoning code wouldn’t allow it. Mr. Fuhs again emphasized that each of the eight (8) lots had their own parcel numbers and property taxes whereas he felt it should be allowed. Commissioner Dooley asked if there were two (2) entrances into the area (south of Boyd Avenue). CB stated yes; two (2) entrances off Frances Street and Williams Street. CB used the overhead projector to display the GIS Map pointing to the entrances. Commissioner Dooley asked if new businesses had a limit on the amount incoming semi-trucks. She was concerned for the surrounding mobile home park whereas businesses could create excessive noise and traffic flow. CB stated that since he’s been in his position none of the businesses in that area have ever been true industrial uses. If they leave as the Industrial (I) zone district they’ll have to turn down a lot of commercial uses that want to go into those buildings. CB didn’t think that it was fair to be holding out for one industrial use that may go in there someday. He stated that rezoning to the Heavy Commercial (HC) zone district will help the property owners get the most use out of their property and it will also help Gallup to generate more gross receipts because it will have more businesses occupying the buildings. Chairman Wilson asked the Commissioners if they had any further questions. There were none. Chairman Wilson stated that the hearing was closed. Motion to approve or deny the request for Case Number 2019-00600005. Commissioner Cresto motioned for approval of Item One. Seconded by Commissioner Long. Motion Carried. Upon roll call, the following votes were: Commissioner J. Cresto (Yes) Commissioner M. Long (Yes) Commissioner J. Dooley (No) Commissioner F. Pawlowski (Yes) Commissioner L. Miller (Yes) INFORMATION ITEMS ITEM TWO: City Council Actions Taken Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting December 11th, 2019 Page 5 of 7 ITEM THREE: November 2019 Building Permit Activity Report OPEN FLOOR: RJ Ferrari Jr. approached the podium and Chairman Wilson administered the oath required by State Law for public forum. RJ Ferrari Jr. introduced himself as the business owner of Gallup Sales. Mr. Ferrari explained how he had a complaint about the Planning & Development Department and wanted to speak to the Commission about resolving his issues. He spoke about how he received two (2) notices for his vacant lot on East Coal Avenue and how he wasn’t pleased about it. Mr. Ferrari received a notice from Code Enforcement about his weeds thereafter he started to clean his property. He later decided to do some dirt work to eventually install a fence whereas he received a Red Tag and had to stop his project. Mr. Ferrari wanted to know why he needed a building permit to rake and level the ground on his own property. Chairman Wilson stated that if he received a notice from the Planning and Development Department for Code Enforcement violations or Building Permit issues he needed to go back and deal with them directly. Mr. Ferrari’s issues weren’t something that the Planning and Zoning Commission could address. Mr. Ferrari understood and thanked the Commission for their time. Commissioner Cresto was curious as to how downtown Gallup was zoned and what the mixed use districts intent was. CB used the overhead projector to display the GIS Map showing the different zone districts located downtown. CB informed Commissioner Cresto that downtown was primarily zoned Mixed-Use Neighborhood (MXN) and Mixed-Use Center (MXC). The mixed use districts intent was to allow a mixture of uses whereas MXN allowed residential with small stores or restaurants and MXC allowed commercial with small apartments. The Chihuahuita area was a good example of the MXN because it’s an older neighborhood that primarily has residential with small restaurants like Genaro’s. When the City was updating the LDS they wanted to encourage small restaurants and mom n’ pop shops because in the old code it wasn’t allowed. The new code however does allow it whereas special conditions are placed on the businesses to control outdoor seating, parking, landscaping and buffering for noise. Having those conditions ensures that there’s not a negative impact on the surrounding neighborhoods. MXC was used to revitalize the older downtown area whereas it allowed a mix of stores on bottom floors and apartments on top. The City thinks this will help encourage the foot traffic and business in the downtown area. Commissioner Cresto asked to see where the Gallup Business Improvement District (BID) was located whereas CB pointed to the area on the GIS Map. Commissioner Long pointed out how the BID had nothing to do with the zoning code. CB stated that was correct. Motion was made by Commissioner Pawlowski to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Commissioner Miller. Motion Carried. Upon roll call, the following votes were: Commissioner F. Pawlowski (Yes) Commissioner L. Miller (Yes) Commissioner J. Dooley (Yes) Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting December 11th, 2019 Page 6 of 7  Commissioner M. Long (Yes) Commissioner J. Cresto (Yes) Commission Adjourned at 6:47 p.m. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION KENT WILSON, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: CLYDE (C.B.) STRAIN SECRETARY TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting December 11th, 2019 Page 7 of 7  209 MARGUERITE ST., 1808 & 1820 W. AZTEC AVE. NL 4.22 ACRES M/L IN SE 1/4 OF SEC. 20 T15 R18, A/K/A A PORTION OF LEBECK-ATKINS ADDN. BLOCK 4 HC 1 1/8/2020 Request by Joe DiGregorio, Six D., Inc, property owner, for Final Plat approval of a Minor Subdivision; Christine Subdivision Replat No. 1 of Block 4, Lebeck-Atkins Subdivision. Said property is generally located Northeast of Marguerite Street and Aztec Avenue (209 Marguerite Street, 1808 & 1820 W. Aztec Avenue); containing 3.8132 acres M/L. AERIAL IMAGERY  Request by Joe DiGregorio, Six D., Inc, property owner, for Final Plat approval of a Minor Subdivision; Christine Subdivision Replat No. 1 of Block 4, Lebeck-Atkins Subdivision. Said property is generally located Northeast of Marguerite Street and Aztec Avenue (209 Marguerite Street, 1808 & 1820 W. Aztec Avenue); containing 3.8132 acres M/L. SITE PHOTOS October 22, 2019 MEMORANDUM TO: GALLUP TASK FORCE (GTFl > C.B. Strain, Community Planner > Stan Henderson, Executive Director, Public Works Division > Mike DeClercq, WaterAA/aste Water Superintendent > Marita Joe, Senior Electrical Engineer > Adrian Marrufo, Solid Waste Director > Jacob LaCroix, GFD, Fire Inspector > Dianne Willato, CenturyLink Engineer > Irma Bustamante, NM Gas Co. Distribution Superintendent > John Ortiz, CpmcasLSupedntendent FROM: /m/ p. Roman J. Herrera, Development Review Coordinator cc; Dennis Romero, Water & Wastewater Executive Director John Wheeler, Electric Director CASE #: 19-00300002 PROJECT NAME: Christine Subdivision PROPERTY OWNER: Six D. Inc. c/o Joe DIGregorio PROJECT LOCATION: 209 Marguerite St., 1808 & 1820 W. Aztec Ave.; 4.22 Acres M/L in the SE % of Sec. 20, T15, R18, aka A Portion of Lebeck-Atkins Addn., Block 4. DESCRIPTION: Minor Subdivision; Sketch Plat Review: The property owner is requesting that the above described parcel be subdivided into four (4) lots; 1, 2, 3 & 4. The property is presently zoned Heavy Commercial (HC), a zone change is not being requested. ELECTRONIC COMMENTS ARE DUE BY: 31 OCTOBER 2019 NO TASK FORCE MEETING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED COMMUNITY PLANNER COMMENTS: P1.) Change description of subdivision as follows: "Christine Subdivision, Being Repiat No. 1 of Block 4, Lebeck-Atkins Subdivision, as shown on the plat of said subdivision filed in the office of the Clerk of McKinley County, New Mexico on March 29, 1955, less and except Aztec Avenue, situated within the southeast portion of the NW % of Section 20, T15N, R18W, N.M.P.M. Gallup, McKinley County, New Mexico" P2.) Ok to proceed to Final Plat. Provide all required data on Final Plat per Section 11-1-E of the City of Gallup Land Development Standards, Subdivision Regulations. Request by Joe DiGregorio, Six D., Inc, property owner, for Final Plat approval of a Minor Subdivision; Christine Subdivision Replat No. 1 of Block 4, Lebeck-Atkins Subdivision. Said property is generally located Northeast of Marguerite Street and Aztec Avenue (209 Marguerite Street, 1808 & 1820 W. Aztec Avenue); containing 3.8132 acres M/L. AREA MAP  Request by Joe DiGregorio, Six D., Inc, property owner, for Final Plat approval of a Minor Subdivision; Christine Subdivision Replat No. 1 of Block 4, Lebeck-Atkins Subdivision. Said property is generally located Northeast of Marguerite Street and Aztec Avenue (209 Marguerite Street, 1808 & 1820 W. Aztec Avenue); containing 3.8132 acres M/L. PROPERTY MAP 8 11 7 6 9 10 5 1B 1A 12 4 1C 13 3 2  Request by Joe DiGregorio, Six D., Inc, property owner, for Final Plat approval of a Minor Subdivision; Christine Subdivision Replat No. 1 of Block 4, Lebeck-Atkins Subdivision. Said property is generally located Northeast of Marguerite Street and Aztec Avenue (209 Marguerite Street, 1808 & 1820 W. Aztec Avenue); containing 3.8132 acres M/L. ADDRESS LIST 1A. SIX D., INC. 2.014 ACS M/L IN THE SE ¼ P.O. BOX 1455 NW ¼ OF SEC. 20 T15 R18, A GALLUP, NM 87305-1455 PORTION OF BLOCK 7, 4.22 ACRES M/L IN SE ¼ OF LEBECK-ATKINS SUB. SEC. 20 T15 R18, A/K/A A R019925 PORTION OF LEBECK-ATKINS ADDN. BLOCK 4 4. TAMMY BAUMGARDNER R208881 P.O. BOX 4793 GALLUP, NM 87305-4793 1C. BLOCK 4 THE WEST 74 FEET A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE SE OF THE SOUTH 172 FEET OF ¼ NW ¼ OF SEC. 20 T15 R18 BLOCK LEBECK ATKINS SUB. CONT. 1.910 ACRES M/L LESS R610135 PORTION SOLD TO ARROW REALTY 1B. SIX D., INC. R035742 ATTN: SOUTHWEST PROPERTY TAX 5. DENNIS & KAREN HERRING P.O. BOX 5037 HOWARD GRANBURY, TX 76049-5037 1901 BARBARA AVE. BLOCK 4 A PARCEL OF LAND GALLUP, NM 87301 LYING WITHIN LEBECK ATKINS BLOCK 5, LOTS 1 THRU 6, SUB. CONT. 8,670.935 SQ. FT. LEBECK-ATKINS SUB. M/L R001171 R206920 6. OM SAI, LLC 2. SCHOOL BOARD OF 1903 W. HIGHWAY 66 EDUCATION GALLUP, NM 87301 P.O. BOX 1318 BLOCK 2 LOTS 5 THRU 13, GALLUP, NM 87305-1318 LOTS 60 THRU 72, LEBECK 10 ACS. M/L IN 20 15 18, NE ¼ ATKINS SUB. SE ¼, SE ¼ NW ¼ R022209 R033561 7. SERENITY CEMETERIES VI, 3. NATIONAL PROPANE, L.P. LLC C/O AMERIGAS EAGLE 7220 N. 16TH ST. STE. C PROPANE, L.P. PHOENIX, AZ 85020 P.O. BOX 798 BLOCK 1 LOTS 37 THRU 46, VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482- LEBECK ATKINS SUB. 9908 R677620 8. ITAF RASHID, TRUSTEE 13. CARL A. & THEODORA R. 1309 COUNTRY CLUB PL. MAYES GALLUP, NM 87301 1715 ESCALANTE RD. LOT 3A, REPLAT NO. 1 OF GALLUP, NM 87301-6793 LOTS 3, 4 & 5, & 16’ WIDE LOT 1, BLOCK 1, SAGEBRUSH ALLEY, A PORTION OF BLOCK VALLEY UNIT 1, ALSO A 2, LEBECK-ATKINS SUB. PORTION OF VACATED CONT. 4.4475 ACRES M/L VALLEY ADJACENT TO SAID R109568 LOT R208595 9. CASANO ENTERPRISES, LLC P.O. BOX 1455 GALLUP, NM 87305-1455 BLOCK 4 IMPROVEMENTS ONLY ON N. PORTION OF LEBECK-ATKINS ADDN. D/B/A WASH & SAVE LAUNDRY R180963 10. CASANO ENTERPRISES, LLC ATTN: SOUTHWEST PROPERTY TAX P.O. BOX 5037 GRANBURY, TX 76049-5037 BLOCK 4 N. PORTION 5.29 ACRES IN SE ¼ NW ¼ OF LEBECK-ATKINS ADDN. R119822 11. T.M. & RAHADA M. SUNDARAM 4505 ATHERTON WAY NW ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87120 TRACT A, REPLAT NO. 1 OF LOT 2, SUNDARAM SUB. NO. 1 AND SUNDARAM SUB. NO. 2, CONT. 9.0298 ACRES M/L R037656 12. GALLUP LAND PARTNERS, LLC 9911 SOUTH 78TH AVE. HICKORY HILLS, IL 60457 A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE SW ¼ NE ¼ OF SEC. 20 T15N R18W, LYING N. OF AZTEC AVE. CONT. 4.52 ACRES M/L R186686 LEGAL #______________ CORRECTED LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Gallup Planning and Zoning Commission will consider the following action at its regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, January 8th, 2020. The item will go before the City Council for final approval at its regular meeting to be held on January 28th, 2020. Both meetings will be held at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall located on the corner of South Second Street and West Aztec Avenue. CASE # 20-00900001: City initiated request to amend Title 10 “Land Development Standards” of the Municipal Code of the City of Gallup Section 10-2-B-a “Residential” and Section 10-2-B-c “Non-Residential”; Tables 10-2-2, 10-2-4, 10-2-6, 10-2-8, 10-2-19 and 10-2-21. Add side street yard requirements for corner lots within the Rural Residential (RR), Single-Family Residential (SFR-A, B & C), Multi-Family Residential Low (MFRL), Multi-Family Residential Medium (MFRM), General Commercial (GC) and Heavy Commercial (HC) Zone Districts. Establish ten foot (10’) side street yard setbacks for SFR-A & B, MFRL, MFRM and GC and fifteen foot (15’) side street yard setbacks for RR, SFR-C and HC. This item had been previously advertised with the wrong side street yard setback for SFR-C in a legal notice published December 27, 2019. Auxiliary aides for the disabled are available upon request. Please contact C.B. Strain at (505) 863-1244, at least one (1) week prior to the meeting or as soon as possible in advance of the meeting to make any necessary arrangements. All interested parties are invited to attend. City of Gallup, McKinley County, New Mexico By: /S/ Alfred Abeita, City Clerk PUBLISH: 3 January 2020  Summary of City Council Actions December 2019 [No actions taken on any Planning & Zoning items]  Planning & Zoning Commission Attendance Record January February March August September October November December 2019 April May June July TOTAL Term Expires Chairman Wilson P P A P P A P P 6/8 excused excused May 31, 2021 No Meeting No Meeting Commissioner Mackenzie- A A A P A P P P 4/8 Chavez excused excused excused May 31, 2021 A No Meeting No Meeting Commissioner Dooley P P P P P P P 7/8 May 31, 2020 excused Commissioner Pawlowski P P P P P P P P 8/8 May 31, 2021 Commissioner Kozeliski P P P P - - - - - - 4/4 May 31, 2019 Vice-Chairman Long P P P P P P A P 7/8 May 31, 2020 No Meeting No Meeting excused Commissioner Miller P A P P P P A P 6/8 May 31, 2021 excused excused Commissioner Cresto - - - - - - P P P P 4/4 May 31, 2021 At the City Council Meeting on June 25, 2019 - Kent Wilson, Keegan Mackenzie-Chavez, Fran Palowski and Loren Miller were re-appointed to the Planning and Zoning Commission (two-year terms). John T. Cresto was also newly appointed (two-year term).  CITY OF GALLUP PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 110 W. AZTEC AVENUE GALLUP, NM 87301 505.863.1240 MONTHLY COMPILATION OF PERMITS ISSUED CITY OR COUNTY: MAILING ADDRESS: GALLUP, McKINLEY COUNTY, NM P.O. BOX 1270 GALLUP, NM 87305 MONTH OF: DECEMBER YEAR TO DATE: 2019 NUMBER OF NUMBER OF VALUATION VALUATION DESCRIPTION PERMITS PERMITS NEW SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS 0 $ ‐ 2 $ 375,000.00 RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS / ALTERATIONS 5 $ 114,550.00 33 $ 497,421.00 RESIDENTIAL STORAGE SHED 0 $ ‐ 2 $ 8,500.00 RESIDENTIAL GARAGES & CARPORTS 0 $ ‐ 1 $ 42,000.00 RESIDENTIAL SITE PERMITS 0 $ ‐ 0 $ ‐ NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS 0 $ ‐ 2 $ 1,150,000.00 COMMERCIAL ADDITIONS / ALTERATIONS 3 $ 158,050.00 39 $ 5,742,683.00 COMMERCIAL STORAGE SHED 0 $ ‐ 1 $ 7,000.00 COMMERCIAL GARAGES & CARPORTS 0 $ ‐ 0 $ ‐ COMMERCIAL SITE PERMITS 0 $ ‐ 0 $ ‐ NEW CHURCHES 0 $ ‐ 0 $ ‐ CHURCH ADDITIONS / ALTERATIONS 0 $ ‐ 2 $ 1,665,500.00 RE‐STUCCO / SIDING / DECKS 1 $ 500.00 10 $ 78,300.00 NEW ASPHALT / ASPHALT OVERLAY / SEALCOAT 0 $ ‐ 2 $ 30,000.00 EXCAVATION / GRADING 0 $ ‐ 2 $ 213,989.00 NEW APARTMENTS 0 $ ‐ 0 $ ‐ APARTMENT ADDITIONS / ALTERATIONS 0 $ ‐ 3 $ 1,353,974.00 HOTELS / MOTELS 0 $ ‐ 0 $ ‐ ROOF REPAIR 3 $ 22,500.00 106 $ 1,154,919.00 DEMOLITION 0 $ ‐ 9 $ 173,911.00 FENCE / RETAINING WALL 0 $ ‐ 27 $ 82,230.00 FOUNDATION ONLY ‐ CHARGE 0 $ ‐ 1 $ 47,029.00 FOUNDATION ONLY ‐ NO CHARGE 0 $ ‐ 0 $ ‐ SWIMMING POOLS 0 $ ‐ 0 $ ‐ DECK 0 $ ‐ 0 $ ‐ TOTAL PERMITS & VALUATION 12 $ 295,600.00 242 $ 12,622,456.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES $ 3,984.05 $ 109,213.38  CITY OF GALLUP PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT MONTHLY COMPILATION OF PERMITS ISSUED DECEMBER 2019 DATE PERMIT PERMIT PERMIT OWNER / BUSINES CONTRACTOR SITE ADDRESS VALUATION ISSUED NO. TYPE FEES 12/2/19 19 ‐ 285 CHRISTOPHER LANG R.G. LATH PLASTER, INC. 1230 CAESAR DRIVE STUCCO PERMIT $ 30.00 $ 500.00 COMMERCIAL 12/3/19 19 ‐ 262 CHRISTOPHER P. KELSEY MURPHY BUILDERS 511 E. NIZHONI BOULEVARD $ 556.65 $ 38,050.00 ALTERATIONS DAVID BACA RESIDENTIAL 12/4/19 19 ‐ 284 HOME MODIFICATION SOLUTIONS 2437 BACA COURT $ 80.25 $ 2,000.00 C/O GUADALUPE VALLES ALTERATIONS RESIDENTIAL 12/9/19 19 ‐ 290 SUSAN JOHNSON HOMEOWNER 1210 FAIRWAY DRIVE $ 72.00 $ 5,000.00 ALTERATIONS COMMERCIAL 12/10/19 19 ‐ 293 HILTON GARDEN INN SUNDARAM BUILDERS, INC. 1530 W. MALONEY AVENUE $ 441.00 $ 25,000.00 ALTERATIONS RESIDENTIAL 12/12/19 19 ‐ 291 MARICRUZ MERINO HOMEOWNER 1010 RANCHO ROAD $ 365.40 $ 25,000.00 ALTERATIONS RESIDENTIAL 12/12/19 19 ‐ 295 RICHARD MURPHY GALLUP ROOFING, INC. 506 DEFIANCE AVENUE $ 141.00 $ 10,500.00 RE‐ROOFING COMMERCIAL 12/16/19 19 ‐ 294 CENTURY LINK TARTAN CONSTRUCTION, LLC 121 W. AZTEC AVENUE $ 1,079.75 $ 95,000.00 ALTERATIONS RESIDENTIAL 12/16/19 19 ‐ 299 SONDRA MILES GALLUP ROOFING, INC. 3722 MAYA DRIVE $ 96.00 $ 6,000.00 RE‐ROOFING RESIDENTIAL 12/18/19 19 ‐ 292 LAKE BEGAY HOMEOWNER 1722 ESCALANTE ROAD $ 315.15 $ 20,000.00 ADDITIONS COMMERCIAL 12/18/19 19 ‐ 301 POINT AMERICAN TIRES T.G. ORR ENTERPRISES, INC. 1001 W. COAL AVENUE $ 106.00 $ 6,000.00 RE‐ROOFING RESIDENTIAL 12/31/19 19 ‐ 302 LEANNE GILLSON DIAZ RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION 3720 MAYA DRIVE $ 700.85 $ 62,550.00 ALTERATIONS TOTALS: $ 3,984.05 $ 295,600.00 5 RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS / ALTERATIONS 3 COMMERCIAL ADDITIONS / ALTERATIONS 1 RE‐STUCCO / SIDING / DECKS 3 ROOF REPAIR 12 TOTAL PERMITS P.O. BOX 1270 GALLUP, NM 87305 PHONE: 505.863.1240 FAX: 505.722.5131  City of Gallup Planning and Development Building Permit Activity Report Five Year Comparison 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 DESCRIPTION NO. VALUATION NO. VALUATION NO. VALUATION NO. VALUATION NO. VALUATION New Single Family Dwellings 4 $ 1,150,460.00 10 $ 1,852,000.00 10 $ 1,940,000.00 4 $ 657,500.00 2 $ 375,000.00 Residential Addition/Alterations 27 $ 369,519.00 34 $ 491,231.00 20 $ 335,835.00 33 $ 516,600.00 33 $ 497,421.00 Residential Storage Sheds 1 $ 4,600.00 2 $ 13,325.00 1 $ 3,800.00 4 $ 29,400.00 2 $ 8,500.00 Residential Garage/Carports 2 $ 5,295.00 2 $ 13,302.00 4 $ 15,450.00 3 $ 23,059.00 1 $ 42,000.00 Residential Site Permits 1 $ 20,000.00 0 $ - 1 $ 9,000.00 1 $ 17,000.00 0 $ - New Commercial Buildings 6 $ 3,898,155.00 5 $ 3,425,000.00 2 $ 2,125,000.00 5 $ 977,059.00 2 $ 1,150,000.00 Commercial Additions/Alterations 24 $ 2,557,036.00 25 $ 1,670,499.00 26 $ 9,335,740.00 32 $ 3,158,310.00 39 $ 5,742,683.00 Commercial Storage Sheds 1 $ 68,000.00 2 $ 18,100.00 2 $ 4,140.00 1 $ 5,500.00 1 $ 7,000.00 Commercial Garage / carports 0 $ - 2 $ 24,500.00 0 $ - 0 $ - 0 $ - Commercial Site Permits 0 $ - 0 $ - 2 $ 9,019,894.00 0 $ - 0 $ - New Churches 0 $ - 0 $ - 0 $ - 0 $ - 0 $ - Churches/Additions/Alterations 0 $ - 0 $ - 0 $ - 2 $ 60,000.00 2 $ 1,665,500.00 Siding/Re-Stucco 7 $ 19,000.00 13 $ 55,897.00 23 $ 94,950.00 14 $ 56,500.00 10 $ 78,300.00 Asphalt / Overlay 20 $ 405,699.00 13 $ 230,260.00 28 $ 813,025.00 12 $ 191,493.00 2 $ 30,000.00 Excavation / Grading 2 $ 9,000.00 1 $ 1,000.00 3 $ 385,464.00 1 $ 350,000.00 2 $ 213,989.00 New Apartments 0 $ - 0 $ - 0 $ - 0 $ - 0 $ - Apartment Addition/Alterations 1 $ 19,150.00 0 $ - 0 $ - 0 $ - 3 $ 1,353,974.00 Hotels/Motels 2 $ 10,200,000.00 0 $ - 0 $ - 0 $ - 0 $ - Roofs/Roof Repair 118 $ 824,431.00 137 $ 1,322,617.00 115 $ 1,258,832.00 129 $ 1,042,144.00 106 $ 1,154,919.00 Demolitions 11 $ 296,135.00 14 $ 427,325.00 10 $ 92,720.00 18 $ 178,970.00 9 $ 173,911.00 Fence/Walls/Retaining Walls 36 $ 164,878.00 41 $ 137,553.00 25 $ 105,324.00 24 $ 90,661.00 27 $ 82,230.00 Foundation Only - Charge 1 $ 29,775.00 2 $ 69,772.00 3 $ 628,000.00 4 $ 241,696.00 1 $ 47,029.00 Foundation Only - No Charge 0 $ - 0 $ - 0 $ - 0 $ - 0 $ - Swimming Pools 1 $ 76,700.00 $ - 1 $ 50,000.00 0 $ - 0 $ - Other 0 $ - 0 $ - 0 $ - 0 $ - 0 $ - TOTALS 265 $ 20,117,833.00 303 $ 9,752,381.00 276 $ 26,217,174.00 287 $ 7,595,892.00 242 $ 12,622,456.00 Permit Fees $ 126,561.99 $ 93,859.98 $ 147,900.75 $ 81,757.76 $ 109,213.38 % change based on permit fees -36% -26% 58% -45% 34% % change based on valuation -52% -52% 169% -71% 66% UPDATED: 12/31/2019  Building Permit 5 Year Comparison VALUATION OF IMPROVEMENTS 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 ‐ 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 New Single Family Dwellings $1,150,460.00 $1,852,000.00 $1,940,000.00 $657,500.00 $375,000.00 New Commercial Buildings $3,898,155.00 $3,425,000.00 $2,125,000.00 $977,059.00 $1,150,000.00 Hotels/Motels $10,200,000.0 $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ Number of Permits Issued 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 New Single Family Dwellings 4 10 10 4 2 New Commercial Buildings 6 5 2 5 2 Hotels/Motels 2 0 0 0 0 City of Gallup ∞ Planning & Development ∞ P.O. Box 1270 ∞ Gallup, NM 87305 Phone: 505.863.1240 ∞ Fax: 505.722.5131  City of Gallup Planning & Zoning Agenda Five {5} Year Comparison ACTION TAKEN 2015 ACREAGE 2016 ACREAGE 2017 ACREAGE 2018 ACREAGE 2019 ACREAGE Miscellaneous 4 0.1996 1 0 6 1.88 4 0.2320 1 0.0000 Annexations 0 0 1 3.077 0 0 0 0 2 117.7862 SUBDIVISIONS Site Development Plans 0 0 0 0 1 2.993 0 0 0 0 Administrative 4 27.5231 1 3.077 7 13.6143 2 24.7497 6 8.8078 Minor 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 288.7202 2 173.6489 Major 1 1.13 1 5.7708 2 35.87 0 0 0 0 ZONING Zone Change 3 28.2759 2 15.7509 4 190.199 2 3.37 5 23.632 Conditional Use Permit 4 27.6332 4 8.83641 2 89.883 5 10.3608 2 0.5952 Variance 0 0 0 0 3 3.834 0 0 0 0 Appeals 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.18 0 0 TOTALS 16 84.7618 10 36.51211 25 338.2733 16 327.6127 18 324.4701 Miscellaneous items {i.e. right-of-way vacations, street re-naming, text amendments, etc..}