Muyni
← Back to Greenfield

Groundwater Sustainability Agency

Regular Meeting

Greenfield, CA · September 27, 2022

Agenda

Agenda

ARROYO SECO GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY MEETING September 27, 2022 @ 4:00 P.M. Virtual Attendance Only and Remote Viewing Options The Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency (“ASGSA”) will be conducting its regular meeting on September 27, 2022. Consistent with Assembly Bill (AB) 361, the Agency will hold this meeting virtually only, without in-person attendance by the public and without a physical location for public participation. Further, and consistent with AB 361, the meeting is accessible for public participation through video conferencing and livestreaming. The Board meeting to be held on September 27, 2022, at 4:00 p.m. will only be accessible online and may be viewed through the following options: Please click the link below to join the webinar: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85103980831 Or One tap mobile: US: +16699006833,,85103980831# or +16694449171,,85103980831# Or Telephone: Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 669 444 9171 or +1 719 359 4580 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 646 931 3860 or +1 929 205 6099 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 309 205 3325 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 386 347 5053 or +1 564 217 2000 Webinar ID: 851 0398 0831 The ASGSA will provide links to these streaming options on the City of Greenfield’s website and on its Facebook page. Public Comment Public comments will be permitted in the following formats: (1) through Zoom, and (2) through e-mail. If you wish to make a public comment through Zoom, please use the “raise your hand” feature during the public comment section of the agenda that you wish to comment on. You will be selected by the meeting host and will be allowed to say your comment aloud. If you wish to make a public comment through email, please submit your public comment to cityclerk@ci.greenfield.ca.us. In the subject line of the email, please state your name and the item you are commenting on. If you wish to submit a public comment on more than one agenda item, please send a separate e-email for each item you are commenting. Please be aware that written public comments, including your name, may become public information. City of Greenfield Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency 599 El Camino Real Greenfield, CA 93927 Meeting Agenda September 27, 2022 4:00 P.M. The Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency will be conducting its regular meeting on September 27, 2022. Given the current Shelter-in-Place Order covering Monterey County and the Social Distance Guidelines issued by Federal, State, and Local Authorities, the Agency is implementing changes for attendance and public comment. The Groundwater Sustainability Agency meeting to be held on September 27, 2022 at 4:00 p.m. will only be accessible online. Please review the Agency’s Attendance and Public Comments Changes Due to COVID-19 for further information. PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE D. PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA This portion of the Agenda allows an individual the opportunity to address the Agency on any items not on closed session, consent calendar, public hearings, and Agency business. Under state regulation, no action can be taken on non-agenda items, including issues raised under this agenda item. Members of the public should be aware of this when addressing the Agency regarding items not specifically referenced on the Agenda. PLEASE NOTE: Given the current Shelter-in-Place Order covering Monterey County and the Social Distance Guidelines issued by Federal, State, and Local Authorities, the Agency is implementing changes for attendance and public comment. Please review the Agency’s Attendance and Public Comments Changes Due to COVID-19 for additional information. Please be further aware that all public comments must be submitted via email to the following email address: cityclerk@ci.greenfield.ca.us. Meeting Agenda September 27, 2022 E. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one action of the Agency, unless a request for removal for discussion or explanation is received prior to the time Agency votes on the motion to adopt. E-1. ADOPTION of Resolution GSA #2022-09, A Resolution of the Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency Authorizing the Continued Use of Remote Teleconferencing Provision (AB 361) E-2. APPROVE Minutes of the July 26, 2022 Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency Meeting E-3. APPROVE Minutes of the August 23, 2022 Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency Meeting F. AGENCY BUSINESS F-1. ADOPTION of Resolution GSA #2022-10, A Resolution of the Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency Creating a Procedure to Comply with the Groundwater Well Verification Requirements in Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-7-22 a. Staff Report b. Public Comments c. Agency Board - Comments / Review / Action F-2. RECEIVE Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency General Manager’s Status Report a. Oral Report b. Public Comments c. Agency Board - Comments / Review / Action G. ADJOURNMENT In compliance with the American With Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (831) 674-5591. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting (CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II). This agenda is duly posted outside City Hall and on the City of Greenfield web site RESOLUTION GSA NO. 2022-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE ARROYO SECO GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY AUTHORIZING THE CONTINUED USE OF REMOTE TELECONFERENCING PROVISIONS (AB 361) WHEREAS, the Governing Board of the Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency (“Governing Board”) is committed to open and transparent government, and full compliance with the Ralph M. Brown Act (“Brown Act”); and WHEREAS, the Brown Act generally requires that a public agency take certain actions in order to use teleconferencing to attend a public meeting virtually; and WHEREAS, the Governing Board recognizes that a local emergency persists due to the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, the California Legislature has recognized the ongoing state of emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic and has responded by creating an additional means for public meetings to be held via teleconference (inclusive of internet-based virtual meetings); and WHEREAS, on September 16, 2021, the California legislature passed Assembly Bill (“AB”) 361, which amends Government Code, section 54953 and permits a local agency to use teleconferencing to conduct its meetings in any of the following circumstances: (A) the legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency, and state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; (B) the legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency for the purpose of determining, by majority vote, whether as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees; or (C) the legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency and has determined, by majority vote, pursuant to subparagraph (B), that, as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees; and WHEREAS, in order for the Governing Board to use teleconferencing as allowed by AB 361 after October 1, 2021, it must first adopt findings in a resolution, allowing the Governing Board to conduct teleconferenced meetings for a period of thirty (30) days; and WHEREAS, Governor Gavin Newsom declared a state of emergency for the State of California due to the COVID-19 pandemic in his order entitled “Proclamation of a State of Emergency,” signed March 4, 2020; and WHEREAS, the Governing Board previously adopted Resolution Number 2021-01 on October 26, 2021, finding that the requisite conditions exist to conduct remote teleconference meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e); and WHEREAS, the Governing Board is conducting its meetings through the use of telephonic and internet-based services so that members of the public may observe and participate in meetings and offer public comment; and {SR649035} WHEREAS, as a condition of the continued use of the provisions found in Government Code section 54953(e), the Governing Board must reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency and find that either it continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person, and/or state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; and WHEREAS, the County of Monterey continues to require and/or recommend certain social distancing requirements of people within Monterey County, as described in detail in the “Recommendation Regarding Social Distancing Including Remote Meetings of Legislative Bodies,” issued by the Monterey County Health Department on September 22, 2021; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the recitals set forth above are true and correct and fully incorporated into this Resolution by reference. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Governing Board has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency and finds that the state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of members to meet safely in person. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Governing Board has determined that state or local officials have imposed or recommended social distancing measures. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the actions taken by the Governing Board through this Resolution may be applied to all District committees governed by the Brown Act unless otherwise desired by that committee. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Governing Board authorizes the General Manager or their designee(s) to take all actions necessary to continue to conduct Governing Board meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) and all other applicable provisions of the Brown Act, using teleconferencing for a period of thirty (30) days from the adoption of this Resolution, after which the Governing Board will reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency Governing Board on this 27th day of September 2022, by the following vote: AYES, and all in favor, thereof, Board Members: NOES, Board Members: ABSENT, Board Members: ABSTAIN, Board Members: ____________________________ Chair of the Board Attest: _____________________________ City Clerk of the City of Greenfield {SR649035} CITY OF GREENFIELD ARROYO SECO GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY MINUTES AGENCY MEETING OF JULY 26, 2022 This meeting was conducted via Zoom. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Thorp, Vice Chair Griva, Board Member Rodriguez, Martinez and Wood Absent: None Staff: Interagency Attorney Thompson, General Manager Weeks, City Clerk Rathbun APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA A MOTION by Board Member Rodriguez, seconded by Vice Chair Griva to approve the Minutes of the June 28, 2022 Meeting of the Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency and Resolution GSA #2022-07, “A Resolution of the Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency Authorizing the Continued Use of the Remote Teleconferencing Provision (AB 361)”. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Board Member Wood, Board Member Martinez, Board Member Rodriguez, Vice Chair Griva and Chair Thorp. Motion carried. AGENCY BUSINESS RECEIVE ARROYO SECO GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY GENERAL MANAGER’S STATUS REPORT General Manager Weeks gave a report on the Implementation Committee meeting for the forebay. He stated that the Committee discussed the selection of a member from the Implementation Committee to the newly appointed Advisory Committee for the Salinas Valley Basin GSA and stated that Jerry Lohr was selected to represent the Forebay. He stated that he would be representing the Arroyo Seco GSA. He also discussed the Advisory Committee’s roles and responsibilities. He discussed the two wells and their locations that the Committee would like to have; one along the Arroyo Seco River and the other close to the Salinas River in the north section closer to the east side. Board Member Wood asked about the cost of the monitoring well and who would be paying for it. General Manager Weeks stated that it would depend on where it was located and stated that anything that happened in our area could be submitted to the Salinas Valley Basin GSA for reimbursement; however, the Agency would be seeking grant funds. He stated that the monitoring wells could be up to $50,000. Vice Chair Griva gave an example of the costs of drilling a well. Chair Thorp stated that it would be ideal to use an existing well. July 26, 2022 GSA Minutes Page 2 General Manager Weeks stated that the Committee also discussed the management actions and projects and adoption of a policy that would protect the unregulated nature of the Arroyo Seco River as well as discussion of the Salinas River maintenance program. General Manager Weeks stated that the Salinas Valley Basin GSA was developing their own integrated implementation plan and stated that as soon as it was ready, he would run it through the Arroyo Seco GSA Advisory Committee and Board. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 4:21 p.m. __________________________ Chair of the Board ___________________________ City Clerk of the City of Greenfield CITY OF GREENFIELD ARROYO SECO GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY MINUTES AGENCY MEETING OF AUGUST 23, 2022 This meeting was conducted via Zoom. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Thorp, Vice Chair Griva, Board Member Martinez and Wood Absent: Board Member Rodriguez Staff: Interagency Attorney Thompson, General Manager Weeks APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA A MOTION by Board Member Wood, seconded by Vice Chair Griva to adopt Resolution GSA #2022-08, “A Resolution of the Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency Authorizing the Continued Use of the Remote Teleconferencing Provision (AB 361)”. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Board Member Wood, Board Member Martinez, Vice Chair Griva and Chair Thorp. ABSENT: Board Member Rodriguez. Motion carried. AGENCY BUSINESS RECEIVE ARROYO SECO GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY GENERAL MANAGER’S STATUS REPORT General Manager Weeks stated that the Salinas Valley Basin GSA Advisory Committee had its first meeting last week and he reported on that meeting. He stated that they did review the integration implementation plan. He stated that the Plan was reliant on the Salinas Valley Integrated Groundwater Model and that model as been shown to not be as accurate as the Board would like. There was discussion regarding the accuracy of the report and the Advisory Committee voted not to support the plan go before the Board of Directors. He stated that Salinas Valley Basin GSA would be discussing this item on their September agenda. There was additional discussion regarding the model. He also stated that he was still gathering information on the Arroyo Seco River watershed protection policy in keeping it unregulated. He also that the Governor of California had put in the executive order that mandated that the GSAs were now in the loop for approving all new wells. He stated that the Salinas Valley GSA had already taken action on this item and stated the only boundary for the Arroyo Seco GSA was the City of Greenfield. He stated that he and Donna Meyers needed to speak about the authority which this Board had vested in the Arroyo Seco Management area and their comfort level to delegate that authority to the Arroyo Seco GSA. He stated that it was not called out in the implementation and would be taking it to the Advisory Committee in September. He also gave an update on the meetings in September – September 21, 2022 Special Advisory Committee and September 22, 2022 a Coordination meeting. August 23, 2022 GSA Minutes Page 2 Tom Virsik stated he was surprised at the Advisory Committee’s action. He stated that the representatives from the north were less interested in the model and more in the comparisons of all the GSPs. He stated that he was surprised because the model had not changed and it was interesting that the Advisory Committee would vote that way. Nancy Isakson, Salinas Valley Water Coalition, stated that she had a different take on the meeting. She stated that the concern was the data. She stated that there was some benefits to the comparison of all the GSPs together; however, they were not one basin and it was important to make sure the data was accurate and more information. She also agreed that the Arroyo Seco GSA should consider using the well form adopted by the Salinas Valley Basin GSA. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 4:26 p.m. __________________________ Chair of the Board ___________________________ City Clerk of the City of Greenfield City of Greenfield Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency MEMORANDUM: September 23, 2022 AGENDA DATE: September 26, 2022 TO: Board Members FROM: Curtis Weeks, General Manager TITLE: CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION CREATING A PROCEDURE TO COMPLYWITH THE GROUNDWATER WELL VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS IN GOVERNOR NEWSOM’S EXECUTIVE ORDER N-7- 22. BACKGROUND On March 28, 2022, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-7-22 addressing continuing drought conditions in California. Paragraph 9 of the Executive Order creates a role for groundwater sustainability agencies (“GSAs”) in the groundwater well permitting process, a role of which GSAs have heretofore not played. Paragraph 9 (a) provides, in relevant part, that a well permitting agency shall not “[a]pprove a permit for a new groundwater well or for alteration of an existing well in a basin subject to the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act and classified as medium- or high-priority without first obtaining written verification from a Groundwater Sustainability Agency managing the basin or area of the basin where the well in proposed to be located that groundwater extraction by the proposed well would not be inconsistent with any sustainable groundwater management program established in any applicable Groundwater Sustainability Plan adopted by the Groundwater Sustainability Agency and would not decrease the likelihood of achieving a sustainability goal for the basin covered by such a plan.” The Executive Order provides that paragraph 9 does not apply to “permits for wells that will provide less than two acre-feet per year of groundwater for individual domestic users, or that will exclusively provide groundwater to public water supply systems as defined in section 116275 of the Health and Safety Code,” the latter being a system with 15 or more service connections or that regularly serves at least 25 individuals daily at least 60 days out of the year. The Arroyo Seco Cone Management Area managed by the ASGSA is designated as a medium priority basin and as required by the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (“SGMA”), the ASGSA has adopted the Forebay Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan (“GSP”). The Forebay Subbasin GSP describes sustainable management criteria and sets forth a menu of management actions and projects that can be implemented to achieve sustainability by2042 as required by SGMA and maintain it thereafter. All these elements, along with required GSP annual reports and updates, constitute the “sustainability program” for each subbasin as mentioned in the Executive Order. In Monterey County, the County of Monterey, Environmental Health Bureau (“EHB”), is the primary well permitting agency, and the Monterey County Water Resources Agency provides some support to the County in that regard. DISCUSSION: It is recommended the Board adopt an appropriate procedure and provide direction to the Staff on how to handle referrals of well applications from well permitting agencies. Staff has the necessary qualifications, in consultation with appropriate technical experts and Agency Counsel, to review and respond to the well permitting agency with respect the Executive Order. The proposed resolution therefore delegates to staff the obligation to respond. The ASGSA Advisory Committee has recommended that the Board adopt the enclosed resolution and verification form. As mentioned, the resolution delegates to staff the duty to respond to a referral from a well permitting agency. The resolution proposes to adopt a template that has been developed with input from agricultural stakeholders and the Monterey County Environmental Health Bureau and is Attachment 2 to the resolution. The response from the ASGSA is either, in the words of the Executive Order, that extractions will not be inconsistent with the sustainability program in the subbasin’s GSP and will not otherwise decrease the likelihood of achieving sustainability in the subbasin, or that extractions would be inconsistent or decrease the likelihood of achieving sustainability. Finally, because the ASGSA is uniquely qualified to comment on the likelihood of a well causing subsidence, the template has a place for the ASGSA to indicate whether it won’t. Consideration of a referral from a well-permitting agency will require some staff time, and maybe consultant time. The draft resolution charges staff to develop an appropriate fee, to be charged directly to the applicant or through the well permitting agency, to recover the costs of the review and response. It is proposed that the ASGSA will recharge the same amount for verification as does the SVBGSA. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Staff recommends the ASGSA Board adoption the Resolution to Comply with Governor’s Well Permitting Verification Process and provide staff direction to use the attached Verification Form. The ASGSA General Manager has reviewed and approved this staff report. Attachment: 2. Resolution to Comply with Governor’s Well Permitting Verification Process 3. Well Permitting Verification Form Resolution No. 2022-10 A Resolution of the Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency Creating a Procedure to Comply with the Groundwater Well Verification Requirements in Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-7-22 WHEREAS, on March 28, 2022, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-7- 22 addressing continuing drought conditions in California; and, WHEREAS, paragraph 9 of the Executive Order creates a role for groundwater sustainability agencies in the groundwater well permitting process, and, at paragraph 9 (a), provides, in relevant part, that a well permitting agency shall not “[a]pprove a permit for a new groundwater well or for alteration of an existing well in a basin subject to the Sustainable Groundwater management Act and classified as a medium- or high-priority without first obtaining written verification from a Groundwater Sustainability Agency managing the basin or area of the basin where the well in proposed to be located that groundwater extraction by the proposed well would not be inconsistent with any sustainable groundwater management program established in any applicable Groundwater Sustainability Plan adopted by the Groundwater Sustainability Agency and would not decrease the likelihood of achieving a sustainability goal for the basin covered by such a plan”; and WHEREAS, the Executive Order provides that paragraph 9 does not apply to “permits for wells that will provide less than two acre-feet per year of groundwater for individual domestic users, or that will exclusively provide groundwater to public water supply systems as defined in section 116275 of the Health and Safety Code”; and, WHEREAS, all subbasins managed by the Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency (“ASGSA”) is in a designated medium-priority basin; and, WHEREAS, as required by the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (“SGMA”), the ASGSA has adopted the Forebay Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plans (GSP) for including the Arroyo Seco Cone management Area it manages, and the Department of Water Resources is reviewing, but as of the date of this resolution has not yet approved, the Forebay Subbasin GSP; and, WHEREAS, the Forebay Subbasin each GSP describes sustainable management criteria, and sets forth a menu of management actions and projects, including pumping restrictions or other forms of demand management, that can be implemented to maintain sustainability, or achieve sustainability in a subbasin by either 2040 (180/400 Foot Aquifer Subbasin) or 2042 (all remaining subbasins) as required by SGMA, and maintain it thereafter, all, along with required GSP annual reports and updates, constituting the “sustainability program” for each subbasin; and, Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, pursuant to the case Protecting our Water and Environmental Resources et al. v. County of Stanislas, et al., 10 Cal. 5th 479 (2020), a well permitting agency such as the County of Monterey is required to consider whether a well permit application must undergo some level of environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”); and, WHEREAS, such environmental review, if required, may aid the ASGSA in complying with the Executive Order; and, WHEREAS, the Executive Order is not permanent, and all or parts of it may be rescinded or terminated by the Governor at any time; and, WHEREAS, it is therefore necessary and appropriate for the ASGSA to adopt a policy regarding compliance with the Executive Order for so long as paragraph 9 is in effect; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency as follows: PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency Governing Board on this 27th day of September 2022, by the following vote: AYES, and all in favor, thereof, Board Members: NOES, Board Members: ABSENT, Board Members: ABSTAIN, Board Members: _________________________ Chair of the Board Attest: _____________________________ City Clerk of the City of Greenfield Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency Well Permitting Verification Form Pursuant to the Governor’s Executive Order N-7-22, this form must be completed, signed, and submitted for each well permit application for all applicable wells. A copy of the well permit application must be attached to this form when submitted. Permits for applicable new or altered wells cannot be approved by the County of Monterey without this form. This Verification Form is not required for wells that will provide less than 2 acre-feet per year of groundwater for individual domestic consumption, or that will exclusively provide groundwater to public water supply systems as defined in section 116275 of the Health and Safety Code. Applicants are strongly encouraged to review the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), California Water Code section 10720 et seq. Well Permit Application No. Date Submitted to County Date Submitted to ASGSA Well Site Location (address) APN Property Owner Name Well Driver Business Name Property Owner acknowledgment (please check each box upon acknowledgment with each statement; all must be checked for the SVBGSA to provide the verification): □ I acknowledge that the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (“SGMA”) requires that the Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency (“ASGSA”) manage groundwater in the Arroyo Seco Cone Management Area. □ I acknowledge that a well permit issued by the County of Monterey does not guarantee the extraction of any specific amount of water now or in the future. □ I acknowledge and agree that the ASGSA is not responsible for or otherwise liable for any costs, investments or payments related to any groundwater well permitted pursuant to Application No. __________, including but not limited to construction costs, costs associated with well failure, and increased maintenance or operational costs. □ If the ASGSA provides the required verification to the County of Monterey, and the County issues a permit in response to Application No. _______________, I agree to hold the ASGSA harmless and indemnify the SVBGSA for any liability arising from or related to the issuance of the well permit. EXECUTIVE ORDER N-7-22 Verification Form □ I agree to pay the reasonable cost, as determined by the ASGSA, for the ASGSA to review Application No. __________ for compliance with Executive Order N-7-22. County of Monterey CEQA Determination: □ The County of Monterey has reviewed the attached permit application pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and made the following CEQA determination: __The application is statutorily exempt from CEQA __ The application is categorically exempt from CEQA __ The County has adopted a Negative Declaration (attach or provide electronic link to the adopted Negative Declaration) __ The County has adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (attach or provide electronic link to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration) ___ The County has certified an Environmental Impact Report (attach or provide electronic link to the EIR) ___ The County has considered an Addendum to a previously certified EIR (attach or provide electronic link to the EIR and Addendum) ___ The County, acting as a responsible agency, has considered and relied upon the following environmental review document: (describe and attach or provide electronic link to the document) ___ Other [describe and attach or provide link to the environmental review document relied upon by County] This verification by the County does not constitute approval of the permit, denial of the permit, or other action with respect to issuance of the permit. ASGSA Determinations (check all that apply): □ Extraction of groundwater by the well proposed in the above described well permit application will not be inconsistent with the sustainability program in the ASGSA's adopted Groundwater Sustainability Plan (“GSP”) for the Arroyo Seco Cone Management Area (ASCMA)(consisting of the Sustainable Management Criteria, Management Actions and Projects in the GSP), will not otherwise decrease the likelihood of achieving a sustainability goal for the Subbasin, and the owner of the proposed well must comply with all ASGSA rules, regulations, and ordinances. □ Extraction of groundwater by the well proposed in the above described well permit application will be inconsistent with the sustainability program with the sustainability program in the ASGSA's adopted GSP for the ASCMA, or will otherwise decrease the likelihood of achieving a sustainability goal for the Subbasin, for the following reasons: [Additional Text to be attached as Attachment A to this Form]. EXECUTIVE ORDER N-7-22 Verification Form □ The proposed well [is] [is not] likely to cause subsidence that would adversely impact or damage nearby infrastructure. □ The proposed well is not subject to Executive Order N-7-22. The verification provided herein is based on the information contained in the well permit application, and on the property owner’s and County’s representations set forth above. The verification is made only upon information known at the time it is made. Comments: ARROYO SECO GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY Signature___________________________________________________ Date____________________ Printed Name________________________________________________ Title________________________________________________________ EXECUTIVE ORDER N-7-22 Verification Form

Get email alerts for Greenfield

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting