Architectural & Historic Board of Review
Regular MeetingHudson, OH · March 10, 2021
Minutes
City of Hudson, Ohio
Meeting Minutes - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
Arthur Morris, Secretary
James Grant
Shane Reid
John Workley
Vacant (1)
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Alicia Schrenk, Associate Planner
Wednesday, March 10, 2021 7:30 PM Via Video-Conference & Live-Stream
I Call To Order
Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic
Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of
the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22.
II. Roll Call
Present: 4 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Absent: 2 - Mr. Grant and Mr. Workley
Present: 4 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Absent: 2 - Mr. Grant and Mr. Workley
III. Public Comment
There were no public comments submitted.
IV. Consent Applications
There were no items on the Consent Agenda.
V. Old Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final March 10, 2021
A. AHBR 21-135 33 Division Street (Historic District)
Alterations (Window Replacements)
Attachments: 33 Division Street
Photos from 3-4-21 Site Visit
33 Division Street - Previous 2/24/21
Preservation Brief - Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Ms. Schrenk introduced the application by noting AHBR did a site visit on March 4, 2021,
where it was determined the submitted windows did not match the existing windows.
Ms. Jen Sickels and Mr. Jonathan Redeb, Andersen Corporation, were present for the meeting.
Board members stated the windows should be repaired instead of being replaced, as called for
by the Secretary of the Interior standards, and that the submitted windows, are not suitable for
this historic house.
Mr. Redeb displayed examples of a completed project by Renewal by Andersen and explained
the weather stripping is part of the sealing system. The Board and Mr. Redeb discussed the
sill profile change that the proposed window brings. Mr. Redeb noted the difficulty of
securing wood to repair windows.
Ms. Marzulla stated the Historic District Subcomittee recommends denying the application.
The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
A motion was made by Mr. Morris, seconded by Mr. Reid, to accept the recommendation of the
Historic District Subcommittee (which is to deny the application). The motion carried by the
following vote:
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
VI. New Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final March 10, 2021
A. AHBR 21-202 77 N Oviatt Street
Demolition/Alteration
Attachments: 77 North Oviatt Street
Mr. Sugar introduced the application by displaying a site plan, photos and floor plan of the
buildings to be demolished. Mr. Sugar also described the areas to be in filled with brick to
match the existing 1927 building.
Mr. John Peterson, GPD Group, and Tom Morrell, Hudson city Schools, were present for the
meeting and noted this request is part of the facility master plan. Mr. Peterson also discussed
the 1927 building features and repair work to be done.
Chair Caputo and Mr. Sugar discussed the nature of the AHBR decision being made.
Mr. Peterson and the Board discussed the work to be done on the 1927 building in light of
potential work by Liberty Development towards repurposing the building. Mr. Peterson noted
the windows in the rear of the building are not original.
Ms. Marzulla made a recommendation that the AHBR finds the proposed structures for
demolition at 77 North Oviatt Street do not have historic or architectural significance.
Further, the Board finds that the applicant for a permit to demolish these structures will not
voluntarily consent to the retention of this building. Mr. Morris accepted the
recommendation, seconded by Mr. Reid. The recommendation was approved by the following
vote:
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Mr. Morris made a motion, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, to approve the in fill of the openings
caused by the building demolition, with brick veneer. The windows are to be inset to maintain
the profile line of the opening. The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final March 10, 2021
B. AHBR 21-31 30 Aurora Street (Historic District)
Addition (Attached Garage)
Attachments: 30 Aurora Street (Revised)
Ms. Schrenk introduced the application by the describing changes to the plan following the
February 4, 2021 site visit. Ms. Schrenk also noted the previous staff comments remain and
reviewed informal comments from Nahler Welman regarding the proposed work.
Mr. Joe Matava and Ms. Elizabeth Nicklas, Peninsula Architects, Larry and Mary Lowman,
homeowners, were present for the meeting. Mr. Matava described the project with the
additions and demolitions by displaying photos of the proposed work and materials, the
history of the house and the rational for the proposed work which is to restore the house to its
former state and allowing the Lowmans to age in place. Mr. Matava also described the
addition as a type of carriage house with details that are found around Hudson and
historically accurate.
The Board and Mr. Matava discussed: 1) The rear addition which will cover the west wall
while removing approximately 14-feet of the rear south/east side wall. 2) The openings from
the rear addition into the house. 3) The prominence of this house on Aurora Street. 4) The
perspective of the house as seen from the west at street level. 5) The lower level of the
carriage house with rear windows to the south. 6) Appreciation for preserving the Italianate
form of the house. 7) The overall massing of the Carriage House compared to the existing
Main House and its close proximity. 8) The south/west proposed new chimney width and
prominence overshadowing the existing rhythm and balance of the existing house.
Mr. Morris stated the Historic District Subcommittee waives the two-week waiting period
and recommends issuing a certificate of appropriateness, Mr. Reid second the
recommendation. The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: 3- Mr. Caputo, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Nay: 1- Ms. Marzulla
Aye: 3- Mr. Caputo, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Nay: 1- Ms. Marzulla
Mr. Reid accepted the recommendation of the Historic District Subcommittee, Mr. Morris
seconded the acceptance. The acceptance was approved by the following vote:
Aye: 3- Mr. Caputo, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Nay: 1- Ms. Marzulla
Aye: 3- Mr. Caputo, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Nay: 1- Ms. Marzulla
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final March 10, 2021
C. AHBR 21-192 96 E Streetsboro Street (Historic District)
Accessory Structure (Pergola)
Attachments: 96 E Streetsboro Street
Ms. Schrenk introduced the application by displaying photos of the property and reviewing
the staff comments and recommendations.
Mr. Dan Hickin, Organic Roots, stated an effort was made to stay close to the rear of the
property in order to have more usable space in the rear yard and to reduce the impervious
surface area.
The Board and Mr. Hickin identified the specific location of the proposed pergola, noted a
large walnut tree whose roots make much of the yard not suitable for building and may be
judged in relation to the buildings as a historic structure. The Board feels the positioning of
the pergola is unusual, but does not violate any of the LDC requirements.
The homeowners were agreeable to moving the pergola away from the structure and turning it
to a different angle.
Ms. Marzulla reported that all members of the Historic District Subcommittee waived the
two-meeting review period and recommended granting a Certificate of Appropriateness for
the plans with the condition that the pergola is set back from the garage at least five-feet,
subject to staff approval. Mr. Morris seconded the recommendation which was approved by the
following vote:
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Mr. Reid accepted the recommendation of the Historic District Subcommittee, seconded by
Mr. Morris and approved by the following vote:
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
D. AHBR 21-167 126 Aurora Street (Historic District)
Alteration (Siding Repair & Shingle Replacement)
Attachments: 126 Aurora Street
126 Aurora St Detached Garage Approval 8-28-2017
Ms. Schrenk introduced the application by displaying photos of the house and reviewing the
staff comments.
Mr. Rob Creque, Campo Roofing, stated the replacement materials and paint will match the
existing house. Mr. Creque also explained that from the damaged area to the peak will need to
be replaced because of Hardie Board.
Mr. Morris, reported that all members of the Historic District Subcommittee waived the
two-meeting review period and recommended granting a Certificate of Appropriateness for
the plans as presented. The recommendation was seconded by Ms. Marzulla and was approved
by the following vote:
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final March 10, 2021
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
A motion was made to accept the recommendation of the Historic District Subcommittee by
Mr. Reid, seconded by Ms. Marzulla. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
E. AHBR 21-161 332 Aurora Street
Addition (Two-Story Rear Porch Rebuild)
Attachments: 332 Aurora Street
Ms. Schrenk introduced the application by displaying the site plan and reviewing the staff
comments.
Mr. Kenneth Kushminder was present for the meeting and described the process to integrate
the roof of the addition into the existing house, displayed photos of the location of the
proposed addition roof and the size of the posts to be used as six-by-six with existing
four-by-four posts left in place.
The Board and Mr. Kushminder discussed new six-by-six posts to replace the existing
four-by-four posts.
Ms. Marzulla made a motion, seconded by Mr. Reid, to approve the application with the
condition that the existing four-by-four posts be replaced with six-by-six posts. The motion
was approved by the following vote:
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
F. AHBR 21-203 33 College Street (Historic District)
Addition (Roof Extension Over Patio)
Submitted by Denise Brown - Historic District - recommend referral to Historic
District Subcommittee pursuant to LDC 1203.12 - no recommendation.
a) Question proposed skylight protrusion and if a lower profile skylight could
be proposed.
Attachments: 33 College Street
Ms. Schrenk introduced the application by reviewing the staff comments and displaying the
specifications of the skylights.
Ms. Denise Brown was present for the meeting.
Mr. Marzulla reported that all members of the Historic District Subcommittee waived the
two-meeting review period and recommended granting a Certificate of Appropriateness for
the plans conditioned on the soffit being wood to match the house. The recommendation was
seconded by Mr. Morris and approved by the following vote:
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final March 10, 2021
AHBR 21-203 33 College Street (Historic District)
Addition (Roof Extension Over Patio)
Attachments: 33 College Street
Mr. Reid made a motion to accept the recommendation of the Historic District Subcommittee,
Mr. Morris seconded the motion which was approved by the following vote:
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
G. AHBR 21-140 1968 Christine Drive (Lake Christine, Lot 10)
New Residential Construction (Two-Story, Single Family Home)
Attachments: 1968 Christine Drive
Ms. Schrenk introduced the application by displaying the site plan and reviewing the staff
comments.
Mr. Tony Lunardi, LDA Builders, was present for the meeting and addressed the staff
comments: 1) The shutters on the double gang windows on the front of the house may be
replaced by wider shutters. 2) The three different materials are similar to other homes he has
built in the development. 3) The homeowners desire stone in the peak areas. 4) The basement
walls are 12 inches thick making alignment with the first floor windows difficult. 5) The
windows directly abutting the wall corners on the second floor can be moved. 6) The trim
around the windows and garage doors will match. 7) Handrails will be placed by the steps.
The Board and Mr. Lunardi discussed: 1) The stone front appears to end on an inside corner
on the side of the house. 2) The fixed window in the dormer being the same size as the lower
windows. 3) Using a single 36 inch window with shutters instead of the two, 32 inch windows
on the front of the house.
Mr. Morris made a motion, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, to approve the application with two
conditions: 1) The two windows on the outside corners on the front of the house be changed to
one, thirty-six inch window with shutters. 2) The dormer window be changed to a thirty-six
inch window. The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
VII. Other Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 7
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final March 10, 2021
A. AHBR 21-194 332 Simon Road (Informal)
Additions & Alterations (Attached Garage, Master Suite, etc.)
Attachments: 332 Simon Road
Ms. Schrenk introduced the application by displaying a drawings and site plan of the
proposed house and reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. Daniel Dunn, Tony Majc from RSA Architects, Mr. Zach and Ms. Rachel Boaz,
homeowners, were present for this informal meeting and discussed the front projection that is
less than the existing projection, the scope of the project which includes a new roof and
reimage of the home.
The Board and applicants discussed: 1) The entire front facade being new. 2) This home in
relation to the neighboring homes. 3) The large bay window. 4) The proposed front projection
which violates the five-foot LDC rule, however the Board believes it is well done.
This matter was discussed
B. AHBR 2-24-2021Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review
Meeting: February 24, 2021
Attachments: AHBR Minutes February 24, 2021 - draft
Mr. Morris made a motion to approve the minutes as amended, seconded by Ms. Marzulla.The
motion was approved by the following vote;
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
Aye: 4- Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Morris and Mr. Reid
VIII. Adjournment
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Reid that the meeting be adjourned.
The motion carried by an unanimous vote.
Hearing no further business, Chair Caputo adjourned the meeting at 9:58 p.m.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 8
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final March 10, 2021
___________________________________________
John Caputo, Chair
___________________________________________
Arthur Morris, Secretary
___________________________________________
Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant
Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written
summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes
shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions,
in accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252.04, Minutes of Architectural and
Historic Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning
Commission.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 9
Agenda
City of Hudson, Ohio
CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
Arthur Morris, Secretary
James Grant
Shane Reid
John Workley
Vacant (1)
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Alicia Schrenk, Associate Planner
Wednesday, March 10, 2021 7:30 PM Via Video-Conference & Live-Stream
I Call To Order
II. Roll Call
III. Public Comment
This meeting will be held via video-conference. Comments can be submitted to
AHBR@hudson.oh.us prior to start of the meeting. Please submit by 4:30 p.m.
of the meeting date. All comments received will be read aloud by staff during
this portion of the agenda.
IV. Consent Applications
V. Old Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Printed on 3/10/2021
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised March 10, 2021
A. AHBR 21-135 33 Division Street (Historic District)
Alterations (Window Replacements)
Submitted by Jen Sickels, Andersen Corporation - Historic District - recommend
referral to Historic District Subcommittee pursuant to LDC 1203.12 - no
recommendation.
a) Staff notes the AHBR conducted a site visit on 3-4-21 to observe the
existing conditions of the windows and proposed sample window.
b) Secretary of Interior Standards state deteriorated historic features shall
be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration
requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match
the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where
possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be
substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.
c) Staff notes proposed window would not match existing wood windows in
texture and design. Proposed window has a composite exterior lacking
the texture of historic materials. Proposed window also has a different
design than the existing windows, including thicker rails/stiles/meeting
rails.
Attachments: 33 Division Street
Photos from 3-4-21 Site Visit
33 Division Street - Previous 2/24/21
Preservation Brief - Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
VI. New Business
A. AHBR 21-202 77 N Oviatt Street
Demolition/Alteration
Submitted by John Peterson, GPD Group
a) The AHBR shall make the following recommendation pertaining to the
demolition: The AHBR finds the proposed structures for demolition at 77 N
Oviatt Street do or do not have historic or architectural significance.
Further, the Board finds that the applicant for a permit to demolish these
structures will not voluntarily consent to the retention of this building.
Attachments: 77 North Oviatt Street
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Printed on 3/10/2021
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised March 10, 2021
B. AHBR 21-31 30 Aurora Street (Historic District)
Addition (Attached Garage)
Submitted by Elizabeth Nicklas, Peninsula Architects - Historic District -
recommend referral to Historic District Subcommittee pursuant to LDC 1203.12 -
no recommendation.
a) Staff notes the AHBR held informal review on 12/16/2020; formal review
on 1/27/2021 and a follow-up site visit on 2/4/2021.
b) Staff acknowledges the following changes since formal review; updated
site plan, decreased size & profile of chimney and reconfigured the form
in the back to have a more central axis.
c) When requested by official action of the AHBR, staff can employ a
qualified, licensed architect to consult with and assist the AHBR on an
advisory basis.
d) Secretary of Interior Standards state “new additions, exterior alterations,
or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that
characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the
old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and
architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and
its environment.
e) Secretary of Interior Standards state, “New additions and adjacent or
related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if
removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic
property and its environment would be unimpaired.”
f) The existing non-historic addition impacts a limited portion of the east
elevation; however, the proposed addition will impact the same area of
the east elevation and almost all of the south elevation. Question if the
addition can be modified so less of the historic structure is impacts and
the original massing is more intact. Please note, the rectangular shape of
the single-story addition could be adjusted to be narrower, but deeper
allowing the existing south elevation dining room window and façade to
remain.
g) Staff notes carriage house detailing of the garage mass is appropriate;
however, the mass is in close proximity to the historic structure and is
significantly taller in height than a typical detached structure. To reduce
the scale of the structure in relation to the historic mass. Question if the
following can be revised:
· Lower the height of the carriage mass below the cornice of the
historic mass.
· Shift the carriage mass several feet to the south.
· Remove the side elevation gable ends of the carriage mass and
utilize the smaller dormers.
· Reduce the overall height as this is designed to appear as a
detached structure and are typical in height no greater than 18
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Printed on 3/10/2021
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised March 10, 2021
feet (per Land Development Code standards). The proposed south
elevation has a structure height of approximately 28 feet.
h) Question presence of garden retaining wall in rear yard. Staff
notes southwest corner has exposure over 4’ in height.
Attachments: 30 Aurora Street (Revised)
C. AHBR 21-192 96 E Streetsboro Street (Historic District)
Accessory Structure (Pergola)
Submitted by Dan Hickin, Organic Roots - Historic District - recommend referral
to Historic District Subcommittee pursuant to LDC 1203.12 - no recommendation.
a) Question placement of pergola directly adjacent to garage. Staff
recommends a minimum five (5) foot separation from the historic structure to
the pergola overhang.
Attachments: 96 E Streetsboro Street
D. AHBR 21-167 126 Aurora Street (Historic District)
Alteration (Siding Repair & Shingle Replacement)
Submitted by Kaitlyn Davis, Campopiano Roofing - Historic District - recommend
referral to Historic District Subcommittee pursuant to LDC 1203.12 - no
recommendation.
a) Staff notes garage was constructed circa 2017 and approved with Hardie
board siding.
b) Verify proposed replacement siding will match existing style and
exposure.
Attachments: 126 Aurora Street
126 Aurora St Detached Garage Approval 8-28-2017
E. AHBR 21-161 332 Aurora Street
Addition (Two-Story Rear Porch Rebuild)
Submitted by Kenneth Kushmider
a) Question roof transition from existing roof to new roof.
b) Question how new roof overlaps 2nd floor window. Staff notes trim band
is not depicted that would likely be obscured.
c) Question if post sizes would match remaining porch.
Attachments: 332 Aurora Street
F. AHBR 21-203 33 College Street (Historic District)
Addition (Roof Extension Over Patio)
Submitted by Denise Brown - Historic District - recommend referral to Historic
District Subcommittee pursuant to LDC 1203.12 - no recommendation.
a) Question proposed skylight protrusion and if a lower profile skylight
could be proposed.
Attachments: 33 College Street
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Printed on 3/10/2021
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised March 10, 2021
G. AHBR 21-140 1968 Christine Drive (Lake Christine, Lot 10)
New Residential Construction (Two-Story, Single Family Home)
Submitted by Tony Lunardi, LDA Builders Inc.
a) Architectural Design Standards state the materials used in any mass must
be applied consistently on that mass on all sides of the structure. Staff
notes mass on left elevation would have stone on first floor and siding on
second floor.
b) Architectural Design Standards state the walls of the main body must be
all one material, or an additional material may be used to call attention
to the composition. A second material may be used on building
projections gable ends, entrance recesses, or to emphasize the horizontal
or vertical divisions of the building. Staff notes three material types on
the front elevation: stone, shake and horizontal siding.
c) Adjust right elevation to depict handrails on both sides of steps.
d) Trim appears wider around windows than around garage doors. Confirm
trim will be a consistent width.
e) Question proposed windows directly abutting a wall corner and if any
additional spacing can be provided.
f) Remove proposed shutters from ganged windows on front elevation.
g) Question if basement windows could be aligned with first floor windows.
h) Staff notes no issues with look-a-likes.
Attachments: 1968 Christine Drive
VII. Other Business
A. AHBR 21-194 332 Simon Road (Informal)
Additions & Alterations (Attached Garage, Master Suite, etc.)
Submitted by Richard Siegfried, RSA Architects
a) Architectural Design Standards only permit front projections up to five
(5) feet. Staff notes forward projecting entryway extends approximately
ten (10) feet.
b) Staff notes addition in rear left elevation would be on the same wall plane
as existing, creating a (54’-8”) foot continuous wall span. Suggest an
eighteen (18) inch minimum inset to break up the wall plane and
emphasize/separate the existing home and the addition.
c) Question if front addition's steep look and cottage design elements is
consistent with design on the rest of the home.
d) Submit specification sheets for roof, siding and window materials for final
review.
Attachments: 332 Simon Road (Informal)
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5 Printed on 3/10/2021
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised March 10, 2021
B. AHBR 2-24-2021 Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
February 24, 2021
Attachments: AHBR Minutes February 24, 2021 - draft
VIII. Adjournment
* * *
The mission of the Hudson City Government is to serve, promote and support, in a fiscally responsible
manner, an outstanding community that values quality of life, a well-balanced tax base, historic
preservation, with a vision to the future, and professionalism in volunteer and public service.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6 Printed on 3/10/2021
Get email alerts for Hudson
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.