Muyni
← Back to Hudson

Architectural & Historic Board of Review

Regular Meeting

Hudson, OH · October 26, 2022

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

City of Hudson, Ohio Meeting Minutes - Final Architectural & Historic Board of Review John Caputo, Chair Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair John Workley, Secretary John Funyak William Ray Karl Wetzel Nicholas Sugar, City Planner Alicia Schrenk, Associate Planner Wednesday, October 26, 2022 7:30 PM Town Hall 27 East Main Street I. Call To Order Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22. II. Roll Call Present: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Marzulla and Mr. Wetzel III. Public Comment Chair Caputo opened the meeting to public comments for anyone wanting to address the Board. There were no comments. IV. Consent Applications A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6- Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Marzulla and Mr. Wetzel A. AHBR 22-1003 219 North Main Street, Suite B (Historic District) Signs (Projecting Sign, Ground Sign - All Brides Beautiful) Attachments: 219 N Main St Ste B 10.21.22 This AHBR item was approved on the Consent Agenda. B. AHBR 22-1055 130 Aurora Street (Historic District) Fence (6’ Lattice Wood Cedar with 7’ Attached Arbor) Attachments: 130 Aurora St This AHBR item was approved on the Consent Agenda. City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final October 26, 2022 V. Old Business There was no Old Business. VI. New Business A. AHBR 22-1079 109 East Streetsboro Street (Historic District) Alteration (Replace Slate Roof) Attachments: E-Mail to the Board from M. Willer 10.21.22 Grand Manor Spec Sheet 10.21.22 Landmark Series Spec Sheet 10.21.22 Historic Preservation Report 10.12.22 Mr. Sugar introduced the application by describing and presenting photos of the project, noting the Board previously approved a shingle style, which mimics slate with a shadow edge and the applicant is now requesting a replacement shingle, which does not have the slate look shadow edge, because of supply chain issues. . Also noted was the preservation consultant did not recommend the proposed product be used. Mr. Ken Romanini and Ms. Lewis noted the approved Carriage House product, which mimics the scalloped shape slate design which is a current accent on the existing roof, will not be available until the first quarter of 2023,, however the Grand Manor shingle may be available in November. The Board noted a preference for the Grand Manor shingle for the entire roof and agreed waiting until 2023 is unreasonable. Mr. Romanini noted there are no other available shingles with the Carriage House look and that retrofitting scalloped shingles at a later date is not practical, however he promised to continue to check on the availability status until installation time. A motion was made by Mr. Ray, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR Application be approved as amended with the use of Grand Manor shingles. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6- Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Marzulla and Mr. Wetzel City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final October 26, 2022 B. AHBR 22-1032 53 Milford Drive Exterior Alterations (Entryway, Doors & Windows - GreenValley Brewing) Attachments: 53 Milford Dr Mr. Sugar introduced the application by describing and displaying photos, the site plan of the project, the proposed entryway and reviewing the standards and staff comments while noting the Applicant will come back to the Board at another time for the Signage Plan Mr. Greg Ernst, AoDK Inc., noted the entire building will be painted including the trim around the front windows. Mr. Ernst also described the materials and look of the sides of the building as well as the landscaping. The Board, applicant and staff discussed the darker gray paint color, the roof plantings, the vertical and horizontal entryway materials, A motion was made by Mr. Funyak, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR Application be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6- Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Marzulla and Mr. Wetzel C. AHBR 22-1043 5633 Virginia Court Addition (Second Floor Addition, Bedrooms & Fitness Room, 484 SF) Attachments: 5633 Virginia Ct (revised 11.7.22) 5633 Virginia Ct (revised 10.24.22) Addendum (received 10.24.22) Front Elevation Comparison Mr. Sugar introduced the application by displaying photos, and elevations and describing the staff comments. Mr. Kent Whitley, applicant, stated the higher height of the building was to give separation between the house and addition. The Board noted additions are to be subordinate to the main mass of the house. The Board, staff and applicant discussed adding a detail to break up the large massing on addition roof. The application was tabled to allow time for revisions. This matter was continued VII. Other Business City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final October 26, 2022 A. AHBR 6326 25 John Clark Lane [Informal Review] New Residential Construction (Two-Story, Single-Family Home) Attachments: 25 John Clark Ln (Informal) Mr. Sugar introduced the application by displaying the site plan, describing the house to be demolished and reviewing the staff comments regarding the proposed setback of the house. Mr. John Carse, representing the owner of the property, noted if the requested setback is not granted, the existing house,which is set back further than the requested 75' new setback The Board, applicant and staff discussed the reason for setting the house further back from the road, viewed the existing and surrounding houses and noted the existing trees will be preserved. The Board expressed general approval for the requested 75-foot setback. This matter was discussed City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final October 26, 2022 B. AHBR 21-1046 53 First Street (Historic District) [Informal Review] Commercial Exterior Alteration (Baldwin-Buss House) Attachments: Baldwin-Buss House - Exterior Report from Peninsula Architects 10.18.22 Baldwin-Buss Exterior Photos 10.21.22 Baldwin-Buss House Approved Elevations 8.1.22 Baldwin-Buss House Elevations - March 9, 2022 Meeting Photos 3.3.22 Staff Memo to AHBR - October 13, 2021 Meeting Mr. Sugar introduced the application by describing the previous Board decisions regarding the siding of the Baldwin-Buss House and the request to discuss new considerations. Mr. Joe Matava, Peninsula Architects, noted over the past couple of months the Baldwin-Buss House has been deconstructed which has led to greater understanding of the original structure. Mr. Matava also noted the west side siding and structural elements were found rotted and some crumbled during removal which led to the preservation report and recommendation for going forward. Mr. Matava also stated his opinion that new siding is needed on the north and west sides to protect the structure. The Board, applicant and staff discussed making a site visit with Naylor-Wellman Historic Preservationists, that this is a 100-percent replacement of the north and west sides of the house, the reason the east side is to be preserved is the risk of harming the structure if the east siding is removed and the fact that the east side is not in as poor of condition as the other sides. Mr. Matava described the work being done at present on the house has a goal of preserving as much material as possible, however some of the materials cannot be reused. Mr. Matava also noted that when materials were discovered that were unsound or unsafe they were removed and restored in kind. Staff and the Board expressed a desire to have conversation regarding elements that were eliminated which were not part of the approved submittal. The Board noted seeing holes in the foundation with Mr. Matava noting the foundation was not structurally sound, therefore the present foundation will be replaced with concrete and a stone veneer. The Board determined to conduct a site visit. This matter was discussed C. AHBR Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: 10-12-2022 October 12, 2022 Attachments: AHBR Minutes October 12, 2022 - draft A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Ray, that the October 12, 2022, Minutes be approved as amended. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6- Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Marzulla and Mr. Wetzel VIII. Staff Update Mr. Sugar noted the Comprehensive Plan process will begin on December 7, 2022. This matter was discussed City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final October 26, 2022 IX. Adjournment A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that the meeting be adjourned at 8:33 p.m.. The motion carried by an unanimous vote. ___________________________________________ John Caputo, Chair ___________________________________________ John Workley, Secretary ___________________________________________ Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions, in accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252.04, Minutes of Architectural and Historic Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning Commission. * * * City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6

Agenda

City of Hudson, Ohio CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised Architectural & Historic Board of Review John Caputo, Chair Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair John Workley, Secretary John Funyak William Ray Karl Wetzel Nicholas Sugar, City Planner Alicia Schrenk, Associate Planner Wednesday, October 26, 2022 7:30 PM Town Hall 27 East Main Street I. Call To Order II. Roll Call III. Public Comment IV. Consent Applications A. AHBR 22-1003 219 North Main Street, Suite B (Historic District) Signs (Projecting Sign, Ground Sign - All Brides Beautiful) Submitted by Splott Graphics a) Staff recommends approval as submitted. Attachments: 219 N Main St Ste B 10.21.22 B. AHBR 22-1055 130 Aurora Street (Historic District) Fence (6’ Lattice Wood Cedar with 7’ Attached Arbor) Submitted by Laura Honnold a) Staff recommends approval as submitted. Attachments: 130 Aurora St V. Old Business VI. New Business City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Printed on 10/26/2022 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised October 26, 2022 A. AHBR 22-1079 109 East Streetsboro Street (Historic District) Alteration (Replace Slate Roof) Submitted by Michael Willer a) At the October 12, 2022, AHBR meeting the board received the Historic Preservation Consultant report which stated the slate roof is a character defining feature of the structure. The consultant did recommend considering replacement of the slate with the condition to explore alternative roof materials to more closely match the existing slate material rather than the proposed landmark shingle. The Grand Manor- Cottage House shingles were referenced to the applicant as a possible replacement materials due to its significant weight/square 425 lb, its weather exposure (reveal) 8 inches, and the ability to replicate the distinctive scallop pattern present on the slate roof. b) At the October 12, 2022, meeting, the applicant representative (contractor) accepted the board recommendation to proceed with the Grand Manor- Cottage House shingle product provided the scallop pattern was maintained. The property owner has stated delays exist in obtaining such product material. As such a new application has been forwarded by the property owner to formally request the board act on the request to utilize the Landmark shingle product. c) The board shall consider the following for a proposed replacement of historic materials: Section III-2(b)(3)(i)(d) of the Architectural Design Standards Substitute materials may be considered when the proposed materials do not alter the historic appearance of the structure, and the proposed materials are compatible in proportion, size, style, composition, design, color, and texture with the existing historic materials. d) Staff requests the applicant submit additional documentation demonstrating how the Landmark shingle complies with the above criteria. e) Staff offers the following comments: 1. Submit detailed photographs of the landmark shingle product placed next to the existing slate to demonstrate the compatible size, color, and proportion 2. The applicant noted the Landmark shingle product has been used in the historic district; however, staff notes the product has not been approved as a substitute material for existing slate. 3. The applicant has stated the landmark shingle has a 5.5 inch reveal while the existing slate has an eight inch reveal. Question if this creates a compatible size and proportion 4. The applicant has submitted product spec sheets for both the CertainTeed Landmark and Grand Manor products. The Grand Manor spec sheet does acknowledge the significant weight, size, quality design and true depth and dimension. 5. The scalloped pattern is significant to the house and should be maintained with the proposed replacement product. The applicant has stated the scalloped pattern is not proposed as part of the submittal. 6. The applicant has stated the landmark shingles have the same texture, color, and composition as the Grand Manor. Both products due contain similar colors and asphalt composition; however, significant differences existing in proportion/size (thickness/weight and reveal), style (shingle shape), and design (scallop pattern). City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Printed on 10/26/2022 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised October 26, 2022 Attachments: E-Mail to the Board from M. Willer 10.21.22 Grand Manor Spec Sheet 10.21.22 Landmark Series Spec Sheet 10.21.22 Historic Preservation Report 10.12.22 B. AHBR 22-1032 53 Milford Drive Exterior Alterations (Entryway, Doors & Windows - GreenValley Brewing) Submitted by Greg Ernst, AoDK Inc. a) Staff notes the entryway feature could be classified as a projection, as it is an open structure. b) For projections, The Architectural Design Standards state the materials need not be the same as other materials in the structure, but should be related to materials used in the details of the structure. While the proposed corrugated metal siding, tongue and groove wood siding, and green roof would not directly relate to the existing building, the Board may consider the following: · The Architectural Design Standards state there shall be architectural variety within a defined network. Staff notes this building and the surrounding buildings on Milford all have a similar design (one story, hip roof). The proposed entryway would help distinguish this building from others while retaining a similar overall design. · The Architectural Design Standards state all buildings must contribute to the public realm in their design by presenting a well-designed public façade. Staff notes the proposed design would be more inviting (open design) and architecturally interesting (green roof) than the existing entryway. · Staff notes the adjacent building to the north has an all-glass entryway which does not directly relate to the main building. Attachments: 53 Milford Dr C. AHBR 22-1043 5633 Virginia Court Addition (Second Floor Addition, Bedrooms & Fitness Room, 484 SF) Submitted by Kent Whitley a) The Two-Story Wing Type identifier states that this type of home has a main body and subordinate wings. Architectural Design Standards state wings may not be larger or taller than the main body of the structure. Staff notes the proposed addition would be approximately 3’ 6” taller than the main mass. Revise elevations to depict the addition to be lower than the ridge of the main mass as it is a forward projecting front-facing garage. Attachments: 5633 Virginia Ct (revised 10.24.22) Addendum (received 10.24.22) City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Printed on 10/26/2022 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised October 26, 2022 VII. Other Business A. AHBR 6326 25 John Clark Lane [Informal Review] New Residential Construction (Two-Story, Single-Family Home) Submitted by John Carse a) This is an informal review of a proposed Two-Story, Single-Family Home with a side facing three car garage. Home to be similar to the previously approved home located at 170 Terex Road. Applicant has requested to informally discuss the setback of the home with the AHBR. b) The Land Development Code states minimum front yard setbacks for Zoning District 3 are fifty (50) feet, provided that averaging shall be required for residential uses. Staff notes the adjacent homes both have a 50' setback and the proposed home would have a 76' setback; however, the Board may consider the large width and size of the lot as mitigating factors. c) Submit product specification sheets for roof, siding/exterior materials, door and window materials. Attachments: 25 John Clark Ln (Informal) B. AHBR 21-1046 53 First Street (Historic District) [Informal Review] Commercial Exterior Alteration (Baldwin-Buss House) Submitted by Nate Bailey, Peninsula Architects a) This is for an informal review of the exterior existing conditions of the Baldwin-Buss House. b) Staff recommends the Board to request a site visit with the assistance of the historic preservation consultant. c) To date the Board has approved the following exterior improvements: · March 9, 2022: 40% of the siding along the south, west and north elevations · July 27, 2022: 100% of siding at the front porch Attachments: Baldwin-Buss House - Exterior Report from Peninsula Architects 10.18.22 Baldwin-Buss Exterior Photos 10.21.22 Baldwin-Buss House Approved Elevations 8.1.22 Baldwin-Buss House Elevations - March 9, 2022 Meeting Photos 3.3.22 Staff Memo to AHBR - October 13, 2021 Meeting C. AHBR Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: 10-12-2022 October 12, 2022 Attachments: AHBR Minutes October 12, 2022 - draft VIII. Staff Update City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Printed on 10/26/2022 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised October 26, 2022 IX. Adjournment * * * The mission of the Hudson City Government is to serve, promote and support, in a fiscally responsible manner, an outstanding community that values quality of life, a well-balanced tax base, historic preservation, with a vision to the future, and professionalism in volunteer and public service. City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5 Printed on 10/26/2022

Get email alerts for Hudson

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting