Architectural & Historic Board of Review
Regular MeetingHudson, OH · October 25, 2023
Minutes
City of Hudson, Ohio
Meeting Minutes - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
John Funyak
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Karl Wetzel
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, October 25, 2023 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
Acting Chair Marzulla called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural &
Historic Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine
Laws of the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22.
II. Roll Call
Present: 4 - Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
Absent: 3 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak and Mr. Wetzel
III. Public Comment
Ms. Nora Jacob Snyder, 34 Division Street, speaking on behalf of Hudson Heritage
Association, requested that the AHBR deny the request to demolish the barn at 2121 Barlow
Street because of its historic significance as part of the Ellsworth Homestead .
A. AHBR-6953 Public Comment Received 10.24.23
Attachments: Public Comment 10.24.23
Chair Marzulla noted the submitted letter gives further details regarding Ms. Snyder's request.
IV. Consent Applications
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, to approve the Consent
Agenda. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final October 25, 2023
A. AHBR 23-100059 Great Oak Drive
Pavilion & Pergola Extension (432sqft)
Attachments: 59 Great Oak Dr. AHBR Packet
This matter was approved on the Consent Agenda.
V. Old Business
A. AHBR 23-914 201 N. Main Street (Historic District)
Demo, Alteration & Re-build
Attachments: 201 N. Main St - Historic Preservation Consultant Report
201 N. Main Street AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting an informal review took place on June
28, 2023, then on October 11, 2023 AHBR decided to conduct a site visit which took place
on October 17, 2023. The historic consultant submitted a report to AHBR from the site visit.
Mr. Joseph Matava, Peninsula Architects, noted a letter from the house moving consultant
stating that moving the structure is nearly impossible, and there is no alternative to removing a
portion of the house prior to lifting the main mass for the needed structural repairs.
The Board, applicant and staff discussed the difficulty of moving the structure without it
crumbling, that little of the existing structure is salvageable, the reasons the house cannot be
lifted directly up and work done under the house, that the floor of the entire structure must be
removed and replaced because of decay causing many difficulties in lifting or moving the
structure, the danger of damaging the neighboring structure when work is done, and the type
of windows the owner is willing to install,
Ms. Kenney moved, seconded by Mr. Ray, to approve the application conditioned on
recommendations two through six of the historical consultants report, that the PVC
shutters be changed to wood and that Pella Traditional Reserve windows with simulated
divides be used. The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final October 25, 2023
B. AHBR 23-789 20 E. Prospect Street (Western Reserve Academy)
Addition (Ellsworth Hall Dining Expansion)
Attachments: WRA Ellsworth Hall AHBR Packet - 10.25.23
April 26th AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting that AHBR conducted an informal
review of this project on April 26, 2023, and Planning Commission has approved the
application conditioned on final design.
Mr. Mark Olsen, and Mr. Seth Duke, Bialosky Cleveland, detailed changes made to the
design as recommended by AHBR, reviewed the elevations and screenings, the difficulty of
securing similar historic windows, that equipment on the second floor roof will not be seen
from the ground, the loading dock details, truck entry, ADA compliance, and that the
sprinkler system and fire alarms will be completed throughout the building.
The Board, applicant and staff discussed access to the stairs, the revised design that respects
the existing structure, a fenestration of some type on the west elevation wall, the freestanding
pergola, adding a highlight panel on the west elevation, and the board requested that the
windows in the packet be approved with changes submitted to staff for approval .
Mr. Workley made a motion, seconded by Mr. Ray, to approve with the condition that
the screen wall be brick, that the west elevation have either a three bay panel or window
spacing articulation on the blank wall area, that the pergola structure have even spacing
around the perimeter, and the windows as submitted be approved but if modifications
are required, the new windows be submitted to staff for approval. The motion was
approved by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
VI. New Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final October 25, 2023
A. AHBR 23-973 1221 Barlow Road
Demolition (1,200sqft Barn)
Submitted by Rachelle Brenner
a) This case went to AHBR on October 25, 2023. The Board requested a site
visit, which was held on November 1, 2023.
b) The property is not within the City of Hudson’s Historic District and is not
a designated Historic Landmark.
c) Following the site visit, the owner has postponed review to allow any
agencies/organizations time to discuss potential relocation
d) AHBR shall make the following finding: the AHBR finds the proposed
structures for demolition at 1221 Barlow Road does or does not have
historic or architectural significance. Further, the board finds that the
applicant for a permit to demolish these structures will not voluntarily
consent to the retention of these buildings.
Attachments: 1221 Barlow Road AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying and describing the barn, and noting
this is not designated as a historic landmark but does have historical significance .
Mr. Dave Mitchell, Attorney for LTC Reality, described an August 3, 2023 notice from
Hudson Community Development that the structure is in disrepair, and that a subsequent
notice required either a plan for repair or demolition. Mr. Mitchell noted the 23 acres are
planned for redevelopment with a vision of becoming part of a campus related to health care .
Mr. Mitchell also stated that during many meetings with staff he was never told removing the
barn would be an issue. He also noted the barn had been neglected through the years is unsafe
and serves no purpose for LTC Reality. Mr. Mitchell also noted his company is willing to
donate the building to anyone or organization willing to move it.
The Board, applicant and staff discussed who made the determination the building cannot be
repaired, the cost of repairing the building being prohibitive for the purpose of the business
that owns it, the history of the property and barn, the intention of LTC Reality when
purchasing the property and today, possible uses of the barn by LTC Reality as proposed by
the Board, that the means of egress to any development must be where the barn is, and that
moving the barn was considered but is not practical for the work of LTC Reality.
A motion was made by Mr. Ray, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR Application
be continued so that a site visit may take place and the applicant meet with staff to
discuss modifications to the planned projects on the property which would allow the
barn to remain in place. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final October 25, 2023
B. AHBR 23-1015167 Hudson Street
Addition (Detached Garage/Pool House 1,082sqft & Outdoor Kitchen)
Attachments: 167 Hudson St. AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the site plan, describing the project
and reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. Matthew Lones, architect, and Mr. Matt Mitchell, homeowner, described the project and
site difficulties, noted the existing garage is in poor condition, described the materials and
windows will match the house, and explained the fenestration of the wall in question .
The Board, staff and applicant discussed alternatives to the shutter on the wall in question .
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Mr. Ray, that this AHBR Application
be approved with the use of closed shutters as approved by staff . The motion carried by
the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
C. AHBR 23-100729 Division Street (Historic District)
Alterations (Windows)
Attachments: 29 Division St. AHBR Packet
29 Division St. AHBR Packet 11.8.23
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying photos of the house, describing the
project and reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. Jared Crowe, and Mr. Scott Harvey, Alair Homes, noted the Anderson existing windows
are replacement windows which leak and will be replaced with Anderson aluminum clad
wood E Series windows with the dividers between the windows.
A motion was made by Mr. Ray, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR Application
be continued. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final October 25, 2023
D. AHBR 23-10067238 Valley View Road
Addition (760sqft)
Attachments: 7238 Valley View AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the site plan, describing the project
and reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. David Pelligra, architect, Mr. Jim Wilson, Contractor, and Mr. David King, homeowner,
described the Anderson 400 windows, the siding which matches the existing siding, and the
shingles. He also noted the ceilings in the existing house do not match, the existing foundation
will most likely need to be replaced - as determined by the contractor, and that a flat roof
exists on the south side of the house.
The Board, applicants and staff discussed the foundation as matching brick veneer, and that a
matching window pattern will be used.
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Ray, that this AHBR Application
be approved with the foundation being a matching brick. The motion carried by the
following vote:
Aye: 4 - Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
E. AHBR 23-857 58 Owen Brown Street (Historic District)
Addition (200sqft)
Attachments: 58 Owen Brown St. AHBR Packet
May 25, 2022 Approved Plans
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing the project and reviewing the staff
comments.
Mr. Ron Zelenak, homeowner, noted matching materials will be used and this project has
been previously approved.
The Board, applicant and staff discussed the roof height and the number of columns .
A motion was made by Mr. Ray, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR Application
be approved with the addition of three columns. The motion carried by the following
vote:
Aye: 4 - Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final October 25, 2023
E. AHBR 23-10016577 Ebury Circle
Addition (2,610sqft garage & rear porch)
Attachments: Ebury Dr. AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the site plan, describing the project
and reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. Jim Reapis, architect, described the project and alternatives which were explored, the pie
shaped lot which limits the visibility of the addition, and the materials and windows which
will match the existing.
The Board, applicant and staff discussed adding a third window as recommended by staff to
the long wall.
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR
Application be approved with the addition of a third window as recommended by staff .
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
VII. Other Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 7
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final October 25, 2023
A. AHBR 23-974 6598 Stone Road (Informal Review)
New Residential Construction (Single-Family Dwelling, 4,113sqft)
Attachments: 6598 Stone Rd. AHBR Packet - Informal
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the site plan.
Mr. Joe Matava, Peninsula Architects, described the project as unique in the : terms of size of
the property, the style of house and the Indian concept of Vastu, which underlies the design of
the house and its surrounding buildings and how they fit into a house in Hudson . Mr. Matava
showed where the existing structures are, the location of neighboring houses, the courtyard
with a door which is considered the front door, that an orchard and tennis court will be on the
property and a new pond will be constructed.
Regarding the staff comments Mr. Matava stated: 1) The front setback request of 230-feet is
greater than the neighboring houses; however, there is a great variety of setbacks on the street
and this setback meets the owner's needs and will save large trees . 2) The driveway will be
moved as recommended by staff. 3) Regarding the garage being in the rear yard Mr. Matava
mentioned that the garage might be considered part of the house since roof and walls connect
to the garage to the house. 4) Regarding the consistency of roof designs - the flat roofs are to
diminish the scale of portions of this large house.
The Board, applicant and staff discussed the riparian setback near the pond, the angle of the
swimming pool, if the garage can be considered attached and whether a variance will be
required, whether the proposed front door will be accepted by the AHBR, the authority of the
Board to declare the house an exceptional design, the placement of windows to achieve
symmetry, the height of the wall and how it fits into the purpose of the house and if it is in
agreement with the LDC and city design standards, the possibility of enlarging the garage to
make it an attached garage, that the Board may waive the requirement that a garage may not
be the most forward structure, and that the garage might be built further from the property
line.
B. AHBR 10-11-23Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
October 11, 2023.
Attachments: October 11, 2023 AHBR Minutes - Draft
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Mr. Ray, that the October 11, 2023,
Minutes be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
VIII. Staff Update
There were no staff updates.
IX. Adjournment
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Mr. Ray, that this be adjourned at
10:09 pm. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 8
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final October 25, 2023
___________________________________________
Allyn Marzulla, Acting Chair
___________________________________________
John Workley, Secretary
___________________________________________
Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant
Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written
summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes
shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions, in
accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252.04, Minutes of Architectural and Historic
Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning Commission .
* * *
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 9
Agenda
City of Hudson, Ohio
CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
John Funyak
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Karl Wetzel
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, October 25, 2023 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
II. Roll Call
III. Public Comment
A. AHBR-6953 Public Comment Received 10.24.23
Attachments: Public Comment 10.24.23
IV. Consent Applications
A. AHBR 59 Great Oak Drive
23-1000 Pavilion & Pergola Extension (432sqft)
Submitted by Dan Van Voorhis, Suncrest Gardens
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.
Attachments: 59 Great Oak Dr. AHBR Packet
V. Old Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Printed on 10/24/2023
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - October 25, 2023
Final-revised
A. AHBR 23-914 201 N. Main Street (Historic District)
Demo, Alteration & Re-build
Submitted by Elizabeth Swearingen, Peninsula Architects
a) Staff notes this project went before the AHBR on June 28, 2023 for an
informal review and before the AHBR on October 11, 2023 as a formal
review.
b) At the October 11, 2023 AHBR meeting, the Board requested a site visit
and assistance from Perspectus, the Historic Preservation Consultant. The
site visit was conducted on October 17, 2023.
c) Perspectus has prepared the attached advisory report for consideration.
Attachments: 201 N. Main St - Historic Preservation Consultant Report
201 N. Main Street AHBR Packet
Legislative History
10/11/23 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
B. AHBR 23-789 20 E. Prospect Street (Western Reserve Academy)
Addition (Ellsworth Hall Dining Expansion)
Submitted by Seth Duke, Bialosky Cleveland
a) Staff notes this project went to the AHBR on April 26, 2023 as an informal
review.
b) The Board members questioned reducing the amount of glass on the south
elevation, the curved shape of the roof, the door design on the east
elevation and the window spacing on the west elevation. The applicant has
submitted plans documenting these changes.
c) The Architectural Design Standards state long expansions of wall should
be avoided. Staff notes a span of approximately 24 feet on the rear
elevation without fenestration; however, this is located along interior
storage space. Question if a brick pilaster treatment could be applied to
break up the wall span.
Attachments: WRA Ellsworth Hall AHBR Packet - 10.25.23
April 26th AHBR Packet
VI. New Business
A. AHBR 23-973 1221 Barlow Road
Demolition (1,200sqft Barn)
Submitted by Rachelle Brenner
a) On August 22, 2023, Code Enforcement sent a notification letter to the
owners of this property for exterior maintenance.
b) Although the barn is not within the City’s Historic District and is not a
designated land mark; however, staff sees historic significance in the barn.
Question if maintenance of the barn has been explored.
Attachments: 1221 Barlow Road AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Printed on 10/24/2023
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - October 25, 2023
Final-revised
B. AHBR 167 Hudson Street
23-1015 Addition (Detached Garage/Pool House 1,082sqft & Outdoor Kitchen)
Submitted by Matthew Lones
a) The owners went to the AHBR as an informal discussion on December 16,
2020 with a previous design. The previous design was not pursued based
on the size and setback requirements within the Land Development Code.
b) The applicant is now proposing a detached garage/pool house that will
meet all applicable Land Development Code standards.
c) The Architectural Design Standards state enclosed accessory buildings
shall incorporate some elements similar to the main body, for example
similar corner boards, window types, or materials.
d) The Architectural Design Standards state all facades (including the rear)
over twelve (12) feet long shall have at least one window or door opening.
Fenestration placement on the accessory structure shall be proportional to
the house. Question the wood shuttered windows on the rear elevation.
Attachments: 167 Hudson St. AHBR Packet
C. AHBR 29 Division Street (Historic District)
23-1007 Alterations (Windows)
Submitted by Jared Crowe
a) The applicant is proposing to replace two existing wood windows on the
front elevation.
b) Staff notes Secretary of Interior Standards require deteriorated materials
to be repaired where feasible rather than replaced. Provide
documentation on the need to replace rather than repair.
c) Question the proposed exterior material. The manufacturer website states
a vinyl material. Staff notes only wood or aluminum clad have been
accepted exteriors.
Attachments: 29 Division St. AHBR Packet
D. AHBR 7238 Valley View Road
23-1006 Addition (760sqft)
Submitted by David Pelligra
a) The applicant is proposing to demo the existing addition and re-build a
new addition in the same footprint as the existing.
b) Staff notes this house is not within the Historic District and is not an
individual landmark.
c) Question the flat roof that will connect the existing house to the addition.
d) Verify proposed foundation material and if a new foundation will be
needed.
e) Applicant to submit product specification sheets on roof, siding and
window materials.
Attachments: 7238 Valley View AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Printed on 10/24/2023
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - October 25, 2023
Final-revised
E. AHBR 23-857 58 Owen Brown Street (Historic District)
Addition (200sqft)
Submitted by Ronald Zelenak
a) Staff notes this case was previously approved by the AHBR on May 25,
2022. The applicant is now proposing to change the plans from an
enclosed rear porch to an open concept rear porch.
b) The applicant is proposing to utilize all previously approved materials.
Confirm deck railing materials.
Attachments: 58 Owen Brown St. AHBR Packet
May 25, 2022 Approved Plans
E. AHBR 6577 Ebury Circle
23-1001 Addition (2,610sqft garage & rear porch)
Submitted by Steven Moore
a) The Architectural Design Standards state all roofs in all the wings must be
of the same kind, but they may have a different pitch or orientation. Roofs
shall not intersect a wall so as to cause a valley. Staff notes the existing
house has a combination of hip and gable roofs. The existing garage has a
gable roof. The applicant is proposing a gable roof on the addition to
match the existing garage.
b) The Architectural Design Standards state large expanses of blank wall are
to be avoided. Fenestration placement should be at a maximum of
approximately every 12 feet. Revise placement of the two rear windows to
meet this requirement.
c) Provide specification sheets of siding, roof and window materials.
Attachments: Ebury Dr. AHBR Packet
VII. Other Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Printed on 10/24/2023
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - October 25, 2023
Final-revised
A. AHBR 23-974 6598 Stone Road (Informal Review)
New Residential Construction (Single-Family Dwelling, 4,113sqft)
Submitted by Quinn Miller, Peninsula Architects
a) The applicant is proposing to demo the existing house and accessory
structure on the property.
b) Staff notes the proposed house would be classified as a large mass type
within the Land Development Code. The large mass type is classified per
the following “This type has a complex massing with several large masses
attached to each other. It does not have a dominant (forward) main body,
but may have one or more central masses to which other masses are
attached. Most of the building is two stories tall. It may have more than
one entrance, and several subordinate wings or projections”
c) The Land Development Code states “the front setback shall not differ by
more than ten percent from the average of the front yard setbacks existing
on the two properties immediately adjoining the subject property, unless
approved by the Architectural and Historic Board of Review”. Staff notes
the proposed house would have a setback of approximately 230 ft. The
adjacent house to the north has a setback of approximately 60 ft. The
adjacent house to the south has a setback of approximately 130 ft. While
the proposed house would not be within 10% of the surrounding homes,
the house would be located on an approximate 5 acre property.
d) As the proposed house would be located to the rear of the property to the
south, staff recommends increasing the setback along this boundary,
moving the driveway further to the north.
e) As designed, the proposed garage would be considered an accessory
structure. Accessory structures must be located within the side or rear or
rear yard. The applicant could look at ways to further integrate the
garage with the main structure to be considered attached; however, also
note the Architectural Design Standards state “attached garage may not
be located within a wing or a central mass that is the most forward of all
the masses.”
f) The Architectural Design Standards state “The same roof shape must be
used throughout the building for all roofs, except for turrets, towers and
other unique masses, where a special roof may be used. Roofs may have
different pitches and orientation. Roofs shall not intersect a wall so as to
cause a valley.” Staff notes flat roofs are shown along with gable roof
forms.
g) The Architectural Design Standards state “At least one entrance must face
the street.” Revise to include an entrance along front elevation.
h) Submit a roof plan with the formal application to help staff and AHBR
better understand teh massing and roof forms.
Attachments: 6598 Stone Rd. AHBR Packet - Informal
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5 Printed on 10/24/2023
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - October 25, 2023
Final-revised
B. AHBR Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
10-11-23 October 11, 2023.
Attachments: October 11, 2023 AHBR Minutes - Draft
VIII. Staff Update
IX. Adjournment
* * *
The mission of the Hudson City Government is to serve, promote and support, in a fiscally responsible manner,
an outstanding community that values quality of life, a well-balanced tax base, historic preservation, with a
vision to the future, and professionalism in volunteer and public service.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6 Printed on 10/24/2023
Get email alerts for Hudson
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.