Architectural & Historic Board of Review
Regular MeetingHudson, OH · October 9, 2024
Minutes
City of Hudson, Ohio
Meeting Minutes - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Jamie Sredinski
Karl Wetzel
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, October 9, 2024 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic
Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of
the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22.
II. Roll Call
Present: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley and Ms. Sredinski
Absent: 1 - Mr. Wetzel
III. Public Comment
Chair Caputo opened the meeting to public comments for anyone wanting to address the
Board. There were no comments.
IV. Consent Applications
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, to approve the Consent
Agenda. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley and Ms.
Sredinski
A. AHBR 24-1108233 Aurora St (Historic District)
Fence
Attachments: 233 Aurora St. AHBR Packet
This AHBR Application was approved on the Consent Agenda.
V. Old Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final October 9, 2024
A. AHBR 24-104333 Roslyn Ave (Historic District)
Fence (3-foot & 6-foot gate)
Attachments: 33 Roslyn AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting it was continued from the September 25 ,
2024, AHBR meeting, reviewed the staff comments, and reviewed the project and site .
Ms. Ann Blechman, 33 Roslyn, homeowner, described the fence project and purpose of the
project, which is to keep their dog in the yard by closing the gap between the neighbor's new
fence and their fence.
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR
Application be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley and Ms.
Sredinski
B. AHBR 24-10395 Baldwin St (Historic District)
Addition, Alterations (Mud Room, Siding, Patio)
Attachments: 5 Baldwin St AHBR Packet
5 Baldwin St AHBR Packet 9.25.14
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting: This was reviewed by AHBR on
September 25, 2024, that a site visit was conducted to examine the condition of the siding, the
Secretary of the Interior's Standards, the applicant's submittals, and the staff comments .
Ms. Madelyn Midgley, Peninsula Architects, reviewed the proposed window materials which
will look historically correct while requiring less upkeep, and described the standing seam
roofing which will go over the existing roofing.
Board members who attended the site visit noted the porch roof is not very visible from the
street, discussed the portions of the house where the siding has been replaced and the need for
the east side siding to be replaced, and were told the shutters will be operable and look like
wood.
A motion was made by Mr. Ray, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR Application
be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley and Ms.
Sredinski
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final October 9, 2024
C. AHBR 24- 849 264 E. Streetsboro St.
Addition (Front Porch)
Attachments: 264 E Streetsboro AHBR Packet
AHBR Packet 9.11.24.
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting it was reviewed by the AHBR at the
August 12, 2024, and September 11, 2024, meetings, and noted the design revisions and an
alternative.
Mr. Shawn Hook, contractor, and Mr. Paul Khacherian, homeowner, were present for the
meeting.
The Board, applicant and staff discussed the shed and hip roof alternatives, the proposed 5 x 5
inch composite posts and the details of the columns, the Board also discussed alternative
columns and the used of Azek instead of wood.
Ms. Marzulla made a motion, seconded by Mr. Ray, to approve the application with: A
shed roof and six by six inch columns, one by six inch top and bottom trim - which is to
be submitted to staff for approval, the railing detail as submitted, and 1 inch by 4 inch
Azek panels for the side elevations. The Board noted the hip roof, as required by the
LDC, was not required because it would have created a valley which is not permitted by
the standards. The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: 5 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Ms. Sredinski
Nay: 1 - Mr. Workley
VI. New Business
B. AHBR 24-10721510 Hines Hill Rd
Addition (Dining Room, Rec Room, Bathroom, and Office)
Attachments: 1510 Hines Hill Rd. AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the site plan and elevations and
reviewing the staff comments.
Ms. Hallie Bowie, New Leaf Home Design, was present for the meeting.
The Board, applicant and staff discussed, allowing the gable roof since another section of the
house has a gable roof, and the proposed elimination of the dormer .
A motion was made by Mr. Ray, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, that this AHBR
Application be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley and Ms.
Sredinski
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final October 9, 2024
C. AHBR 24-11002250 Victoria Pkwy
Addition (Screened in Porch)
Attachments: 2250 Victoria Pkwy AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the elevations and reviewing the
staff comments.
Mr. Gordon Costlow, Costlow and Associates, and Mr. Anthony Gallo, homeowner, stated
the proposed foundation will match the existing, and that a trim board will separate the
addition from the existing house.
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR
Application be approved with trim board and the foundation to match the existing
foundation. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley and Ms.
Sredinski
E. AHBR 24-106195 E. Streetsboro (Historic District)
Addition (Porch)
Attachments: 95 E. Streetsboro AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the elevations, reviewing the project,
the materials specifications, and staff comments.
Mr. Greg Chaplin, architect, and Mr. Bob Elish, noted the siding plan under the west window
was submitted and alternatives to the siding.
The Board, applicant and staff discussed: The patio roof and shingles matching the existing,
that siding under the window is a better alternative than the frame, that the proposal is that
attic windows will be replaced with the same style of windows, however, the need for
replacement has not been verified and documented as of this AHBR meeting, the need for the
specification sheet on the wood railing, and that the replacement window(s) will be the same
size as the existing.
Mr. Workley made a motion, seconded by Mr. Ray, that the porch design being
resubmitted, that staff review the cut sheet for the windows, and the siding be blended
in. The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley and Ms.
Sredinski
VII. Other Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final October 9, 2024
A. AHBR 7537 61 Sussex (Informal)
Addition (Attached Garage)
Attachments: 61 Sussex AHBR Packet - Informal
Mr. Sugar recused himself from this informal discussion because of a relationship with the
homeowner.
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the elevations, describing the
project, and reviewing the staff report.
Mr. Steve Hanna, designer, and Mr. Eric Long, property owner, described the history of the
property and purpose of the project including a disable child who needs an ADA suite, and
noted the proposed application fits the financial needs of the family and a disabled child's
needs. Mr. Long also expressed his appreciation of Hudson Building Codes including the
diversity of homes and the prohibition of front facing garages, however, in this neighborhood
front facing garages are common.
The Board, applicant and staff discussed: If a rear entry garage was considered - which is a
possibility, however, the financial burden is significant as well as the loss of the backyard
space, the number of houses with front facing garages in the neighborhood, the extenuating
circumstances of this situation, the difficulties presented by a detached garage with wheelchair
access into the house, whether the circumstances are significant enough to violate the LDC,
that the difficulties of using a rear entrance may be the compelling reason for allowing the
front facing garage, that the unique situation warrants the exception, and the possibility of a
more decorative garage door - which the AHBR would prefer.
Also discussed was whether this is a wing house or an intersecting mass house, Mr . Long
presented his opinion that this is an intersecting mass house which will not violate the LDC .
The Board stated that if the front facing door is permitted this will be a moot issue.
Chair Caputo noted he sensed no strong opposition from the Board for allowing the front
facing garage door.
This matter was discussed.
VIII. Staff Update
Ms. Krickovich noted the minutes will be presented at the next meeting.
The Board and staff discussed the possibility of a workshop, this will be a discussion item on
the next agenda.
This matter was discussed.
IX. Adjournment
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Ray, that the meeting be
adjourned at 8:44 p.m.. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley and Ms.
Sredinski
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final October 9, 2024
___________________________________________
John Caputo, Chair
___________________________________________
John Workley, Secretary
___________________________________________
Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant
Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written
summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes
shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions, in
accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252.04, Minutes of Architectural and Historic
Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning Commission .
* * *
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6
Agenda
City of Hudson, Ohio
CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Jamie Sredinski
Karl Wetzel
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, October 9, 2024 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
II. Roll Call
III. Public Comment
IV. Consent Applications
A. AHBR 233 Aurora St (Historic District)
24-1108 Fence
Submitted by Amanda Keller
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.
Attachments: 233 Aurora St. AHBR Packet
V. Old Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Printed on 10/9/2024
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - October 9, 2024
Final-revised
A. AHBR 33 Roslyn Ave (Historic District)
24-1043 Fence (3-foot & 6-foot gate)
Submitted by Morgan Norris
a) Staff notes this project was on the 9/25/24 AHBR agenda and was
continued.
b) The Architectural Design Standards state that except in District 8, only the
following fence materials shall be allowed: wood (or vinyl closely
resembling wood), wrought iron (or aluminum closely resembling wrought
iron), stone, or brick. All other fence materials, including chain link and
vinyl-clad chain link, are prohibited. Staff notes the applicant is proposing
to install a 6-foot-high wood gate connecting to an existing 6-foot-high
chain link fence that belongs to Hudson Schools and a neighboring 6
-foot-high wood fence. Question the aesthetics of the connection between
the different materials.
c) Submit a cutsheet depicting how the wood gate would attach to the existing
chain-link fence.
d) Question if the proposed gate would remove a section of the neighbor’s
fence and, if so, provide authorization from the owner.
Attachments: 33 Roslyn AHBR Packet
B. AHBR 5 Baldwin St (Historic District)
24-1039 Addition, Alterations (Mud Room, Siding, Patio)
Submitted by Madelyn Midgley
a) The proposal was introduced to the AHBR at the September 25, 2024
meeting. Following the meeting, the AHBR conducted a site visit to further
evaluate the request.
b) The Secretary of Interior Standards state “Deteriorated historic features
shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration
requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match
the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where
possible, materials.” Staff notes replacement wood siding is proposed
along the east elevations. Additional photographs taken during the site
visit are attached depicting the condition of the siding.
c) Staff notes PVC shutters have been proposed. The Architectural Design
Standards States the materials shall be compatible in proportion, size,
style, composition, design, color, and texture of historic materials. Provide
documentation verifying the proposed shutters meet this requirement.
d) A metal roof is proposed at the porch. Submit a product specification
sheet for the proposed roof material.
e) Revise submitted surveyed site plan to depict proposed improvements
(addition, patio).
Attachments: 5 Baldwin St AHBR Packet
5 Baldwin St AHBR Packet 9.25.14
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Printed on 10/9/2024
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - October 9, 2024
Final-revised
C. AHBR 24- 264 E. Streetsboro St.
849 Addition (Front Porch)
Submitted by Shawn Hook
a) The proposal for a front porch was heard at the August 12, 2024 and
September 11, 2024 AHBR meetings.
b) The applicant has submitted a hip roof design as requested by the AHBR.
The applicant has also submitted a shed roof design and would like the
AHBR to consider this proposal.
Attachments: 264 E Streetsboro AHBR Packet
AHBR Packet 9.11.24.
VI. New Business
B. AHBR 1510 Hines Hill Rd
24-1072 Addition (Dining Room, Rec Room, Bathroom, and Office)
Submitted by Stephen Cochran
a) The Architectural Design Standards state roofs in all the wings must be of
the same shape as the main body, but they may have a different pitch or
orientation. Roofs shall not intersect a wall so as to cause a valley. Staff
notes the main body has a gambrel roof and the addition is proposed to
have a gable roof.
b) Staff notes the applicant is proposing to remove a window on the west
elevation dormer. Question if the entire dormer could be removed.
Attachments: 1510 Hines Hill Rd. AHBR Packet
C. AHBR 2250 Victoria Pkwy
24-1100 Addition (Screened in Porch)
Submitted by Gordon Costlow, Costlow and Assoc.
a) Question the transition from siding on the existing house to the screen
porch panel design on the same mass.
b) The Architectural Design Standards state that exposed foundations and tie
courses shall be of a consistent material on all elevations. Confirm that the
foundation is consistently applied on all elevations.
Attachments: 2250 Victoria Pkwy AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Printed on 10/9/2024
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - October 9, 2024
Final-revised
E. AHBR 95 E. Streetsboro (Historic District)
24-1061 Addition (Porch)
Submitted by Greg Chaplin
a) The applicant is converting a two-unit apartment back to a single-family
residence. The applicant is proposing to remove the addition on the front
and construct a new porch with a design similar to the original.
b) The applicant is proposing a vinyl railing system. Question if this material
should be wood in order to better accommodate historic materials.
c) The Architectural Design Standards state replacement wall and roof
materials should be blended across a facade (rather than small patch
areas) to ensure compatibility with existing materials. Confirm how the
new siding will blend in with the existing.
d) Submit a specification sheet of both proposed new windows (east & west
elevations) and siding.
Attachments: 95 E. Streetsboro AHBR Packet
VII. Other Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Printed on 10/9/2024
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - October 9, 2024
Final-revised
A. AHBR 7537 61 Sussex (Informal)
Addition (Attached Garage)
Submitted by Steve Hanna
a) The applicant is proposed to convert the existing garage into living space
and constructing a forward-facing attached garage.
b) The applicant is requesting input from the AHBR before pursing a
variance with the Board of Zoning & Building Appeals and the Land
Development Code prohibits forward facing garage doors on attached
garages.
c) The Architectural Design Standards state attached garages shall not face
the street except for new development with a front yard depth of 130 feet or
more.
d) The Architectural Design Standards identify a two-story wing type as the
main body is two stories tall and centrally located in the structure and the
front door is located in the main body. Staff notes the proposed addition
would cause the main body to not be centrally located.
e) Staff notes Section II-1 - Approval and Discretion of the AHBR:
c. The AHBR may waive any requirement of these Standards in order to
approve a proposed project, if the AHBR finds that the project fulfills the
five principles enumerated in Section I-2, and meets one of the following
conditions:
(1) The project is an exceptional design, meaning that it is either
especially creative or it is designed in response to unique situation, such as
a very difficult site or an unusual program requirement.
or
(2) Exceptional and unique conditions exist that create a practical
difficulty in complying with the requirements of these Standards. The
AHBR should consider the factors enumerated in as defined in the Land
Development Code in determining "practical difficulty".
Attachments: 61 Sussex AHBR Packet - Informal
VIII. Staff Update
IX. Adjournment
* * *
The mission of the Hudson City Government is to serve, promote and support, in a fiscally responsible manner,
an outstanding community that values quality of life, a well-balanced tax base, historic preservation, with a
vision to the future, and professionalism in volunteer and public service.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5 Printed on 10/9/2024
Get email alerts for Hudson
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.