Architectural & Historic Board of Review
Regular MeetingHudson, OH · June 25, 2025
Minutes
City of Hudson, Ohio
Meeting Minutes - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
Amy Manko
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
Jamie Sredinski
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Lauren Coffman, Associate Planner
Wednesday, June 25, 2025 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic
Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of
the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22.
II. Roll Call
Present: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
III. Public Comment
Chair Caputo opened the meeting to public comments for anyone wanting to address the
Board. There were no comments.
IV. Consent Applications
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, that the Consent
Agenda be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
A. AHBR 25-650 144 Hudson Street (Historic District)
Accessory Structure
Attachments: 144 Hudson St - AHBR Packet
This AHBR agenda item was approved on the Consent Agenda.
B. AHBR 25-633 219 N. Main Street
Sign
Attachments: 219 N Main - AHBR Packet
This AHBR agenda item was approved on the Consent Agenda.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final June 25, 2025
V. Old Business
A. AHBR 25-417 7 College St. (Historic District)
Accessory Structure - Fence (6 foot privacy)
Attachments: 7 College Street Packet for AHBR
7 College Street - AHBR Packet 5.28.25
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by describing the project and reviewing the staff
comments.
Mr. Bruce Huffer, Northeast Ohio Fence was present for the meeting.
The Board, staff, and applicant, discussed: The location of the proposed wood fence - which
the applicant described as behind the house with one gate, and the type of proposed fence .
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR
Application be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
B. AHBR 25-493 80 N Oviatt St (Historic District)
Accessory Structure - Fence (6 ft privacy)
Attachments: 80 N Oviatt St - AHBR Packet
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by displaying the site plan and reviewing the staff
comments.
Mr. Bruce Huffer, Northeast Ohio Fence was present for the meeting.
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed: The design and location of the fence, that no
connection with the neighbor's matching fence will take place,
Mr. Donald Harvey, homeowner, noted the proposed fence will match the neighbor's fence .
the measurements on the drawings,
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR
Application be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
AHBR 25-524 72 Aurora Street (Historic District)
Addition (Guest Bathroom & Terrace)
Attachments: 72 Aurora St - AHBR Packet 6.25.2025
72 Aurora Street - AHBR Packet
Preservation Brief #14 Additions
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by reviewing the elevations, describing the project,
and reviewing the revised elevations.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final June 25, 2025
Mr. Eric Kuczek, applicant, described the updated railings, showed samples of the proposed
brick, and Anderson door and windows.
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed: The proposed wood Anderson door, the mullions
which should be applied to the glass, and that an existing door may be reused,
Ms. Amy Ford, homeowner, stated an attempt was made to use an existing door, but because
it is not weatherized it may not be used, and that all attempts will be made to stay close to the
historic look and material.
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR
Application be approved as amended with applied mullions on the glass of the door . The
motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
VI. New Business
H. AHBR 25-507 2500 Hudson Aurora Rd
Addition (Orchestra Room)
Attachments: AHBR Packet - 2500 Hudson Aurora
Mr. Sugar introduced the application by describing and displaying the addition, noting PC
approved the site plan, and reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. John Peterson, GPD Group, and Mr. Tom Barone, Hudson Public Schools, described the
project and location of the project on the campus, as fitting with the architecture of the high
school, the window types, banding around the addition, and brick materials . Mr. Peterson also
described elements of the design, and commented on: The new doors on the southwest side,
that the mechanicals will be internal, and that the four trees which will be removed will be
replaced with new trees.
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Ms. Sredinski, that this AHBR
Application be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
A. AHBR 25-579 72 N Main Street (Historic District)
Sign
Attachments: 72 N Main St - AHBR Packet 6.25.25
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by noting the location of the proposed sign and
reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. Daxx Vedrin, business owner, stated none of the nearby signs have seven feet clearance,
and the sign will be the same material and thickness as the adjoining sign.
The Board, applicant, and staff, noted the area is unique with the overhang and there is little
danger of people walking under the signs, and the proposed design will meet the overall
standards intent.
Staff noted the Board might require a high density urethane in place of the proposed PVC .
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final June 25, 2025
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, that this AHBR
Application be approved as amended with the use of high density urethane or wood . The
motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
B. AHBR 2025-393
139 Hudson Street
Accessory Structure
Attachments: 139 Hudson St - AHBR Packet 6.25.25
139 Hudson Street AHBR Packet 5.25.25
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by noting it was previously approved and now the
applicant is proposing a change in the siding material.
Mr. Tim Hopkins, homeowner, noted the change is at his request for personal preference .
The Board, applicant, and staff, noted the proposed siding color will be very similar to the
approved color and that other houses on the street have the same type of siding . The Board
also noted a preference for some shake elements to tie it to the house, staff pointed out the
proposed gable returns match the house, and the possibility of the six-over-six windows
matching.
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR
Application be approved as amended with six-over-six windows and the requested siding
change, subject to staff approval. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
C. AHBR 25-102 2507 Barlow Road
Accessory Structure (Agricultural Barn)
Attachments: 2507 Barlow Rd - AHBR Packet
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by displaying the site plan, describing the project,
noting the applicable LDCs, and reviewing the staff report.
Mr. Kevin Dravis, applicant, noted the fence will be four feet tall for the sake of animal
containment, which is a permitted for agricultural use, and in place of windows the Board
suggested others types of fenestration to break up the wide wall expanse .
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR
Application be approved as amended with the addition of 3, 3 foot by 3 foot,
fenestrations on the west side.. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
D. AHBR 25-709 200 Laurel Lake Drive (Villa 23)
Addition
Attachments: 200 Laurel Lake Dr -Packet for AHBR 7.9.25
200 Laurel Lake Dr - Villa 23 - AHBR Packet 6.25.25
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by displaying the site plan, and reviewing the staff
comments.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final June 25, 2025
Ms. Donna Anderson, and Mr. Brian Harvey, Lewis Construction, were present for the
meeting. Ms. Anderson noted she is speaking for Laurel Lake and the homeowner, and noted
the one foot jog in the wall will not lead to good aesthetics in the bedroom.
The Board, applicant, and staff, noted the staff comment regarding the inset will affect the
size of the room and the ability to place furniture on the wall, that the proposed wall has no
precedence in Laurel Lake, and the possibility of a frieze board to assist with the facade
change.
The applicant requested a continuance.
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR
Application be continued. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
E. AHBR 25-287 7593 E Partridge Meadows Dr.
Addition (Bedroom & Office)
Attachments: 7593 E Partridge Meadows Dr - AHBR Packet 6.25.25
7593 E Partridge Meadows Drive - AHBR Packet 4.4.25
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by displaying a rendering of the proposed house, the
addition, the elevations, and reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. Nate Bailey, Hara Architects, stated the goal of the project is to provide a first floor suite
for aging in place and other functionality, that an existing well is partially dictating the
proposed layout of the addition, that at staff's suggestion the addition was moved, that the
frieze boards are a value add to the design, and that the typical window size may be changed
as AHBR wishes.
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed the window size and that shutters will not be added,
the possibility of repeating the vertical siding somewhere else on the house, that the vertical
siding color has not been decided, that the Board appreciates the proposed plan being built
around the well, that some of the existing shutters would not be allowed because they could
not close over the entire window, that several elements make the addition compatible with the
main house, the possibility of placing the windows with greater symmetry, and that the
fenestration meets the LDC.
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR
Application be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
F. AHBR 25-719 20 Pinewood Ln
Addition (Kitchen, Family Room & Bedroom)
Attachments: 20 Pinewood Ln - AHBR Packet 6.25.25
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by describing the project and reviewing the staff
comments.
Mr. Nate Bailey, Hara Architects, described the project which is intended to update the house
with a larger kitchen and family room, replace the windows around the house, add a rear
addition with casement windows, use a consistent brick on the addition, that the dormer will
be reworked to match the addition, that the revised drawings show a hip roof as opposed to
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final June 25, 2025
the current flat roof, and that the addition steps back - so as not to violate the setback .
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed, that the dormer in the front is not part of this
project, that the window grids around the house will match, the windows the neighbors can
see, that the rear landscaping will have engineering approval, and that no grids in the front
helps the look of the casement windows in the rear.
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR
Application be approved as amended with the proposed changes to the foundation, and
consistent window grids around the house, as approved by staff . The motion carried by
the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
G. AHBR 25-482 13 N. Oviatt St
New Construction (Single-family dwelling)
Attachments: 13 N Oviatt Packet for AHBR
Mr. Sugar introduced the application by describing the project and reviewing the staff
comments.
Mr. Nate Bailey, Hara Architects, Ms. Megan Brahm, and Mr. Clay Brahm, homeowners,
were present for the meeting. Mr. Bailey noted the existing house was approved for
demolition and displayed a rendering of the proposed house. He explained the inset
entryway's function and that it fits well with the historic village, that shutters will be used
around the house - aside for the small kitchen window, that PVC is proposed for the shutters,
and the goal of his clients is for a family home that fits into it's historic context.
The Board, applicant, and staff, discussed, the inset entryway that additional columns which
outline the doors and create three bays might be more fitting, that PVC shutters have not been
approved in the historic district, the applicant's willingness to change to a wood or wood-like
shutter material, the acceptable windows which will be submitted to staff for approval, and
that a four or six inch reveal siding will be used.
Ms. Kenney made a motion, seconded by Ms. Srednski, that: additional columns be
added to the inset to create three bays, that the reveal of the siding be four or six inch,
that wood or wood-like shutters be used, and the window brand and type, all of the
conditions are subject to staff approval. The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
VII. Other Business
AHBR 6.11.2025
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: June
11, 2025.
Attachments: June 11, 2025 AHBR Meeting Minutes - Draft
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that the June 11, 2025,
Minutes be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko
Abstain: 1 - Ms. Kenney
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final June 25, 2025
AHBR - Discussion of AHBR Consultant
Consultant
Mr. Sugar noted discussions with Naylor-Wellman are in process regarding the firm resuming
as the historic consultants.
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Ms. Sredinski, that a contract be
signed with Naylor - Wellman to work with AHBR as the consultant. The motion
carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
VIII. Staff Update
There was no Other Business.
IX. Adjournment
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that the meeting be
adjourned at 9:34 p.m.. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
___________________________________________
John Caputo, Chair
___________________________________________
John Workley, Secretary
___________________________________________
Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant
Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written
summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes
shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions, in
accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252.04, Minutes of Architectural and Historic
Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning Commission .
* * *
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 7
Agenda
City of Hudson, Ohio
CD Meeting Agenda - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
Amy Manko
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Jamie Sredinski
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, June 25, 2025 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
II. Roll Call
III. Public Comment
IV. Consent Applications
A. AHBR 25-650 144 Hudson Street (Historic District)
Accessory Structure
Submitted by Frank Remcheck
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.
Attachments: 144 Hudson St - AHBR Packet
B. AHBR 25-633 219 N. Main Street
Sign
Submitted by Leslie Roach
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.
Attachments: 219 N Main - AHBR Packet
V. Old Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Printed on 6/23/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final June 25, 2025
A. AHBR 25-417 7 College St. (Historic District)
Accessory Structure - Fence (6 foot privacy)
Submitted by Heather Borowy, Northeast Ohio Fence
a) Verify the proposed fence would be located behind the main mass of the
house.
b) Submit a scaled site plan accurately depicting the proposed fence along
with the existing property lines and structures.
c) Question if the proposed fence would abut existing fences.
Attachments: 7 College Street Packet for AHBR
7 College Street - AHBR Packet 5.28.25
Legislative History
5/14/25 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
6/11/25 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
B. AHBR 25-493 80 N Oviatt St (Historic District)
Accessory Structure - Fence (6 ft privacy)
Submitted by Heather Borowy, Northeast Ohio Fence
a) Section III-1(f)(3) states “fence heights and materials shall be compatible
with their site location and development”. Staff notes the proposed fence
would tie into and extend a neighboring fence. Submit additional photos
of the area of the proposed fence and the existing neighboring fence to
verify an appropriate design and transition.
b) Submit a scaled site plan accurately depicting the proposed fence along
with the existing property lines and structures.
Attachments: 80 N Oviatt St - AHBR Packet
Legislative History
6/11/25 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
AHBR 25-524 72 Aurora Street (Historic District)
Addition (Guest Bathroom & Terrace)
Submitted by Eric Kuczek
a) Staff notes the proposal was reviewed at the May 28, 2025 AHBR meeting.
The AHBR discussed the use of wood materials for the project, and
requested updated drawings depicting a thicker style wood railing and
post materials for the proposed terrace.
b) Staff notes that the applicant has submitted updated plans depicting wood
materials for the Board to review.
Attachments: 72 Aurora St - AHBR Packet 6.25.2025
72 Aurora Street - AHBR Packet
Preservation Brief #14 Additions
Legislative History
5/28/25 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Printed on 6/23/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final June 25, 2025
VI. New Business
H. AHBR 25-507 2500 Hudson Aurora Rd
Addition (Orchestra Room)
Submitted by John Peterson
a) Submit a roof plan
b) Question the proposed door change and existing window removal are
accurately depicted on the overall southeast elevation.
Attachments: AHBR Packet - 2500 Hudson Aurora
A. AHBR 25-579 72 N Main Street (Historic District)
Sign
Submitted by Daxx Vedrin
a) Submit a detail depicting the sign height above ground level - a minimum
clearance of 7ft is required.
b) Question how proposed materials and design are compatible with the
surrounding signs.
Attachments: 72 N Main St - AHBR Packet 6.25.25
B. AHBR 139 Hudson Street
2025-393 Accessory Structure
Submitted by Madelyn Midgley, Peninsula Architects
a) Staff notes that this application was previously approved at the May 28,
2025 AHBR meeting.
b) The applicant is now proposing a change in siding materials.
Attachments: 139 Hudson St - AHBR Packet 6.25.25
139 Hudson Street AHBR Packet 5.25.25
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Printed on 6/23/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final June 25, 2025
C. AHBR 25-102 2507 Barlow Road
Accessory Structure (Agricultural Barn)
Submitted by Kevin Dravis
a) Staff notes the scope of work includes construction of a 2,400 square foot
agricultural pole barn.
b) The Land Development Code limits accessory structures to 1,200 square
feet in Zoning District 2; however, if the applicant is intending to use the
structure for agricultural purposes the structures has a maximum footprint
allowance of 10,000 square feet. Staff notes the applicant has submitted a
floor plan verifying an agricultural use; therefore, the 2,400 square foot
proposal would be allowed.
c) Section III-1(d)(5) of the Architectural Design Standards states “All
facades (including the rear) over twelve (12) feet long shall have at least
one window or door opening.” Incorporate windows at the north, south
and east elevations.
d) Section III-1(d)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards states “Enclosed
accessory buildings shall incorporate some elements similar to the main
body, for example similar corner boards, window types, or materials.”
Question the materials used and how they related to the existing house.
e) Submit elevation of the proposed wire fencing.
Attachments: 2507 Barlow Rd - AHBR Packet
D. AHBR 25-709 200 Laurel Lake Drive (Villa 23)
Addition
Submitted by Donna Anderson
a) Staff suggests insetting the addition one foot at the left elevation to address
the transition of materials and to create a transition from the existing
gable to the addition.
b) Submit a roof plan of the full building. The submitted sheet 4 of 5 does not
depict the overhead view.
Attachments: 200 Laurel Lake Dr - Villa 23 - AHBR Packet 6.25.25
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Printed on 6/23/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final June 25, 2025
E. AHBR 25-287 7593 E Partridge Meadows Dr.
Addition (Bedroom & Office)
Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects
a) Section IV-4(b)(2) states “The front face of the main body must sit forward
at least 18" from the front face of the wings.” Additionally, Section IV-
4(h)(1) states “The wing must be attached at the rear or side of the
building and may not extend forward of the main body” Staff notes the
proposed addition would extend in front of the main body approximately 3
ft. Staff notes the existing front facing garage wing extends 8 ft in front of
the main body.
b) Section IV-4(e)(4) states “The building shall have a typical window used
for most windows.” Section IV-4(e)(5) states “The public faces of the
building may also have up to three special windows, to call attention to a
special feature in the composition (e.g., a picture window located in the
center of the main body) or to use repetitively. No more than one type of
special window may be used in any mass, except the main body, which may
have two types of special windows.” Question if the windows on the north
elevation could be redesigned to incorporate a more typical window.
c) Question the introduction of gable returns and frieze board trim to the east
and west elevations.
Attachments: 7593 E Partridge Meadows Dr - AHBR Packet 6.25.25
7593 E Partridge Meadows Drive - AHBR Packet 4.4.25
F. AHBR 25-719 20 Pinewood Ln
Addition (Kitchen, Family Room & Bedroom)
Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects
a) Submit an engineered site plan to include existing and proposed
improvements and grading. Staff notes the proposed project includes an
817 sq ft. addition with a basement and an approximate 500 sq ft. patio.
b) Section III-1(g)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards states exposed
foundations and tie courses shall be of a consistent material on all
elevations. Revise elevations to depict the exposed brick foundation to
match the main structure.
c) Section IV-4(c) of the Architectural Design Standards state “All roofs in
all the wings must be of the same shape as the main body, but they may
have a different pitch or orientation.” Staff notes the applicant is
proposing a flat roof and rubber membrane roofing material. Question if
this should be a hip roof to match the main body.
d) Section IV-4(e)(4) states “The building shall have a typical window used
for most windows.” Staff notes the addition depicts a mix of casement and
fixed windows. The existing rear elevation windows are labeled as
replacement in kind; however, are depicted as casement which would not
match the typical window.
Attachments: 20 Pinewood Ln - AHBR Packet 6.25.25
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5 Printed on 6/23/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final June 25, 2025
G. AHBR 25-482 13 N. Oviatt St
New Construction (Single-family dwelling)
Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects
a) Staff notes the proposal would include demolition of the existing home.
The AHBR reviewed prior and determined the demolition would be
approved upon an appropriate new house design .
b) The Land Development Code states “averaging shall be required for
setbacks: Except for new residential development on lots fronting arterial
roads, the front setback shall not differ by more than ten percent from the
average of the front yard setbacks existing on the two properties
immediately adjoining the subject property, unless approved by the
Architectural and Historic Board of Review. If one or more of the
adjoining properties is vacant, the front yard setback shall be fifty feet.”
Staff notes the home is proposed with an 18 ft 4 in setback, which is within
10% of the 19 ft average of the immediately adjoining properties. The
applicant will revise the civil site plan to reflect the setback.
c) Question the inset entryway and if it is typical of this style of house.
d) Question if the grade line is accurately depicted and if the exposed
foundation would be applied consistently.
e) Add shutters to the rear windows so that they are applied consistently
around the house.
f) Question the proposed shutter material.
g) Question the proposed roof material of the front porch.
h) Question if a new wood fence is proposed or if the existing is depicted on
the site plan.
i) Revise the engineered site plan to include an impervious surface
calculation.
j) Revise notes on elevations to verify specific materials proposed. Remove
references to alternates.
k) Staff notes typical siding reveal in the surrounding neighborhood is 4”-6”.
Question if the proposed 8” reveal is appropriate.
Attachments: 13 N Oviatt Packet for AHBR
Legislative History
6/11/25 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
VII. Other Business
AHBR Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: June
6.11.2025 11, 2025.
Attachments: June 11, 2025 AHBR Meeting Minutes - Draft
AHBR - Discussion of AHBR Consultant
Consultant
VIII. Staff Update
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6 Printed on 6/23/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final June 25, 2025
IX. Adjournment
* * *
The mission of the Hudson City Government is to serve, promote and support, in a fiscally responsible manner,
an outstanding community that values quality of life, a well-balanced tax base, historic preservation, with a
vision to the future, and professionalism in volunteer and public service.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 7 Printed on 6/23/2025
Get email alerts for Hudson
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.