Muyni
← Back to Idaho Falls

City Council

Regular Meeting

Idaho Falls, ID · May 8, 2017

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

May 8, 2017 The City Council of the City of Idaho Falls met in Special Meeting (Council Work Session), Monday, May 8, 2017, in the Council Chambers in the City Annex Building located at 680 Park Avenue in Idaho Falls, Idaho at 3:00 p.m. Call to Order and Roll Call: There were present: Mayor Rebecca L. Noah Casper Councilmember Barbara Ehardt Councilmember Ed Marohn Councilmember Thomas Hally Councilmember John B. Radford Councilmember David M. Smith Councilmember Michelle Ziel-Dingman Also present: Ryan Tew, Human Resources Director Chris Fredericksen, Public Works Director Jeff Moad, Parks and Recreation Maintenance Operator Eilene Horne, Human Resources Analyst Dana Briggs, Economic Development Coordinator Pamela Alexander, Municipal Services Director Bear Prairie, Idaho Falls Power Assistant General Manager Randy Fife, City Attorney Kerry Hammon, Public Information Officer Kathy Hampton, City Clerk Mayor Casper called the meeting to order at 3:03 p.m. with the following agenda items: Calendar, Announcements and Reports: May 9, Arbor Day planting project May 10, A Night at the Museum May 11, TRPTA (Targhee Regional Public Transportation Authority)/BMPO (Bonneville Metropolitan Planning Organization) Advisory Committee Meeting May 11, City Council Meeting May 13, Community College Citizens March May 15, Officer Memorial May 16, Election Day May 18, City Club May 18, ISO (Insurance Services Office) Press Conference, Fire Station No. 1 Conference Room May 22, City Council Work Session May 22, Mayor’s bike ride at Community Park May 25, Idaho Falls Power Board Meeting May 25, City Council Meeting May 26-29, Field of Honor Flag Display at Freeman Park May 29, Memorial Day, City holiday Acceptance and/or Receipt of Minutes: It was moved by Councilmember Marohn, seconded by Councilmember Hally, to accept all minutes included in the packet. Roll call as follows: Aye – Councilmembers Dingman, Radford, Marohn, Smith, Hally, Ehardt. Nay – none. Motion carried. Mayor Casper stated the Blue Angels will be holding a welcome celebration on Wednesday, July 19 and a practice session on Friday, July 21. A Veterans event will be held prior to the July 21 practice session. Horse racing events 1 May 8, 2017 will be occuring at Sandy Downs in the upcoming summer months. The July 4th parade will include several floats from the City with a City administration/leadership entry collecting donated items/goods. Secretary of Energy Rick Perry will be visiting DOE (Department of Energy) locations on May 9 and 10. Rose Hill Cemetery experienced recent vandalism including damage to several grave sites and property. The possibility of establishing a donation fund to assist with damage/costs was suggested. The first round of Police Chief interviews occurred May 8 with additional interviews scheduled for May 11. Hiring timeframe anticipated in July-August. Councilmember Hally stated ICUA (Idaho Consumer Owned Utilities Association) will be held July 19-21. City Club forum on May 18 will include a presentation from the Oppenheimer Companies. Councilmember Marohn stated the Fire Station No. 1 Grand Opening was well attended with approximately 700 people touring the facility. Councilmember Radford expressed his appreciation to those downtown businesses who assisted with the Fire Station Grand Opening. He stated there are several new baby animals at the Zoo. Councilmember Ehardt had no items to report. Councilmember Smith stated he will be attending APPA (American Public Power Association) July 19-21. Councilmember Dingman stated the Clean and Green City-wide Cleanup campaign began May 5. The City website has additional information for recycling and indoor/outdoor waste. It was moved by Councilmember Dingman, seconded by Councilmember Ehardt, to modify the agenda to add discussion of proposed Idaho Falls Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) presentation at the next work session (May 22) with the good faith reason that the Council will not meet again before the next Work Session and the request was recently received. Mayor Casper stated the agenda setting authority resides with the Mayor, however any action can be requested by majority of the Council. She indicated it’s unusual for an entity who would like to be on the agenda not to bring it to the attention of the administration. She believes the action to include this item on the agenda has only been addressed in the media and not presented to the City. She stated no communication has occurred between the FOP and the City administration. Councilmember Dingman believes there are several questions in general and she does not want to delay the officers. She stated the motion would include a presentation to the Council on the topic of potential of unionization. Mayor Casper proposed the discussion item be added to the end of agenda. Roll call as follows: Aye – Councilmembers Dingman, Radford, Marohn, Smith, Ehardt. Nay – Councilmember Hally. Motion carried. Mayor Casper stated all citizens have the right to communicate with the Councilmembers at any time and in a variety of ways, unless a quasi-judicial matter is involved or any constraints of a public hearing prohibit such comments. She believes there may be a misunderstanding that just because a public hearing is not being held that there is no forum for Council contact, which is not the case. Councilmember Marohn reiterated that public input is not always a public hearing. Mayor Casper stated with the recent rescission of the Civil Service System occurring over the course of three (3) separate readings she expected communication would have taken place between each of those meetings. Councilmember Dingman stated all Councilmember emails and phone numbers are public record and indicated the Council are available to meet and communicate with community members. Budget Workshop Part II: Employees Wages Discussion: Director Tew reviewed inflation data regarding CPI (Consumer Price Index). He stated CPI is a means to measure inflation based on goods (food, housing, fuel, clothing) that most consumers utilize and purchase on a regular basis. He presented the following information with brief discussion throughout: Source Inflation Reference US Bureau of Labor CPI Actual March/2016 to https://www.bls.gov/regions/west/cpi- Statistics March/2017: 2.4% summary/consumerpriceindex_summary_western.pdf The Livingston Survey - CPI projected 2017: 2.4% https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/research-and- Federal Reserve Bank of CPI projected 2018: 2.5% data/real-time-center/livingston- Philadelphia survey/2016/livdec16.pdf?la=en Idaho Division of CPI Projected 2017: 2.4% https://dfm.idaho.gov/publications/eab/ief/ief_apr2017.pdf Financial Management CPI Projected 2018: 2.5% https://dfm.idaho.gov/publications/eab/ief/ief_oct2016.pdf Forecast 2 May 8, 2017 2017 Federal Employee 2.1% http://www.fedsmith.com/2016/12/28/president-issues- Pay Raise Issued by order-finalizing-2017-federal-employee-pay-raise/ President Obama Director Tew stated he attempted to compare an average of other cities within the State but was unable to provide any data due to the variety of compensation structures. He indicated any inflation increase would begin October 1. He recommended a 2.5% inflation adjustment for City employees. Mayor Casper requested a working consensus from the Council to build the 2.5% adjustment into the budget worksheets. There were no objections. She noted the adjustment for the previous year was 1.75%. At the request of Councilmember Radford, Director Tew stated 1%=~$284,00, 2.5%=~$710,000. Director Tew indicated the following year the City will transition to a pay for performance format which is market-based. Update on Pay for Performance: Director Tew stated in December 2016, the process for pay for performance began with performance implementation anticipated for October 2017 with pay implementation anticipated for October 2018. He indicated the Performance Management Task Force has been meeting on a regular basis. He then introduced Director Fredericksen and Mr. Moad. Director Fredericksen stated the purpose of pay for performance is to foster ongoing communication and development, to improve employees performance, and, to reward employees for their outstanding contributions. He indicated the Task Force includes employees from the majority of City departments. Key concepts include performance planning, ongoing communication, feedback, and documentation. Director Fredericksen believes employees need reinforcement throughout the year for a better understanding. He indicated a draft of core expectations for every employee has been compiled as: observable, measureable, achievable, reasonable, and, understandable. The task force is currently reviewing job specific expectations and measurements for each classification within the City. Goal establishment will also be reviewed. Mr. Moad expressed his appreciation for the opportunity to participate on the task force. He stated the intent for pay for performance is to be a positive benefit for employees as well as the City. Director Fredericksen stated concerns regarding step and grade were expressed. Councilmember Hally indicated pay for performance is not just about wages but also direction for the employee. Councilmember Marohn believes deadlines must be met for this process to be successful. He also believes pay for performance will assist with career development. Director Tew commended the task force for their involvement. At the request of Mayor Casper, Mr. Moad reviewed core values as customer service, dependability, integrity and ethics, continuous improvement, safety, and, teamwork. He stated the task force is currently reviewing definitions of each core value. Personnel Manual/Policy Update: Ms. Horne stated the proposed changes in the personnel manual are in regard to employee status. She indicated previous confusion has occurred with the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and PERSI (Public Employee Retirement System of Idaho) requirements. The specific definitions will determine the option to offer or not to offer benefits. Ms. Horne reviewed the following changes:  Casual Employee, work less than 19.5 hours/week, unlimited length of service  Full-time employee, revised to be more specific (definitions will automatically meet ACA requirements)  Part-time employee, specifies number of hours worked, optional benefits would be prorated accordingly  Seasonal Employee, weather-related, length of time and number of hours  Temporary Employee, not weather-related, length of time and number of hours After brief general discussion, Mayor Casper stated approval of this item will be included on the May 11 Council Meeting Consent Agenda. Community Support Grants Discussion: Mayor Casper believes in recognizing the role for Council in support of worthwhile community endeavors. She then turned the presentation to Ms. Briggs. Ms. Briggs stated she has performed research from other cities within the State with regard to grant process. She proposed the following recommendations and requested Council consensus for the current year: 3 May 8, 2017 1-Set total community support grant budget cap, proposal = $140,000. There has previously been no specific budget amount placeholder. Last year amount = $178,999 2-Set maximum individual grant awards amount, proposal = $40,000. There is a large discrepancy in previous awarded grants. 3-Form community panel that screens applications and then makes a recommendation to City Council, proposal = 1-2 community members (total of 10 members) from: Art Community, Educator/Teacher, Social Services Representative, Medical Community, Business Community, Construction/Development. Councilmember Ehardt is in favor of a hybrid approach – set a cap amount and use of a community panel. As a response to Councilmember Marohn, Ms. Briggs stated the bi-annual funding report is currently in place and she will disseminate the reports to Council. Councilmember Marohn is in favor of a set cap amount. Mayor Casper reviewed previous years and believes it is important to set a cap which would be placed into the budget for planning purposes. Councilmember Radford would prefer a competitive bid process. Councilmember Smith prefers a cap for budgetary purposes and believes the funding should only be given if the applicant meets the mission of the City. Brief discussion followed regarding any special events, which would be presented as a separate operational line item in the budget. Councilmember Dingman believes Ms. Briggs recommendation is the best practice and she would prefer to use all three (3) proposals. Councilmember Marohn suggested the use of at-random citizens on a panel. Councilmember Ehardt prefers citizens who have not previously served on a committee to prevent a conflict of interest. After further brief discussion, it was consensus to have a total cap of $130,000 with individual cap of $35,000. Mayor Casper indicated this item would continue to require approval in the budget, allocating funds from the General Fund. 2018 Audit Planning Discussion: Director Alexander stated the City has historically used two auditors, one for the electric power and one for government business. She stated in July 2016 a Request For Proposal (RFP) was issued for a comprehensive auditor, four (4) proposals were received. An evaluation panel, as well as auditing staff, recommended Moss Adams, taking into account their knowledge of the Cayenta software system. Director Alexander indicated at that time feedback was received from some Councilmembers regarding the lack of using a local auditing firm. She stated Moss Adams had not previously audited the government aspect and they began identifying issues which required additional testing. She reviewed the costs, stating costs are approximately $20,000 over the estimate due to the additional testing and travel, which amounts to a 17% increase of total contract cost. Brief discussion followed regarding the preference to retain an auditor for more than one (1) year to maintain familiarity. There was consensus of the Council to retain Moss Adams. Mayor Casper expressed her appreciation to Director Alexander for her capable management skills. Acceptance of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Contract: Mr. Prairie recognized the assistance of Mindy Moore, Human Resources (HR) staff. He stated the majority of contract changes focused on the wage structure. The journeyman structure is now on a tier scale, including four (4) levels of journeymen. Overall wages, benefits, and health insurance came in under a 2.5% increase. Most positions will receive a 2% compensation, with some lead positions receiving 5% compensation. Senior Hydro Mechanic and Senior Meter Technician were created as new positions. Mr. Prairie indicated there was overcompensation for apprentices compared to market so they will not receive the 2% increase but will continue to increase their rates as training occurs. Language was established on living distance requirement related to use of trouble truck and relocation conditions. Insurance premiums increase will be a shared cost. It was moved by Councilmember Smith, seconded by Councilmember Hally, to approve the Collective Bargaining Agreement with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 57 for the 2017-18 bargaining year, and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the document. Roll call as follows: Aye – Councilmembers Radford, Ehardt, Smith, Marohn, Dingman, Hally. Nay – none. Motion carried. Discussion Regarding FOP Presentation: Councilmember Hally believes the new chief should get acquainted with personnel and current issues prior to this discussion. Councilmember Dingman stated she participated on the interview panel for the Police Chief position and indicated the candidates have variety of backgrounds, some having similar experiences with the current issues. She 4 May 8, 2017 believes it would be ideal to have a new chief in place who would work with the employees prior to any Union moving forward. She stated the request, on behalf of the FOP, is to be placed on an agenda to discuss being recognized as a union within the next 2-3 weeks if possible. Per Councilmember Dingman’s conversation with Dustin Howell, vice-president of the FOP, Mr. Howell indicated the FOP would like to present the concept, the research that has been conducted, and to communicate with the Council in a presentation format. There would be no expectation of action or decision, this would be a presentation only. Director Tew stated although he’s interested in hearing from the FOP he would recommend to wait for a new chief as he believes it doesn't make sense to have a presentation now. Councilmember Dingman indicated other presentations, such as the School District or Airshow Board, have occurred without hesitation. Mayor Casper believes this is a matter of precedence and procedure. She stated presentations have occurred to further a City purpose or further the work of a department(s). She believes in this case, action is only being heard through media. She prefers to continue the current process of presentation through a Department Director or the Council President with the agenda setting determined by the mayor. Mayor Casper stated her commitment and obligation is for robust discussion of any request if that is the will of council but believes all bases (legal, HR, community) need to be covered. Brief discussion followed regarding a timeframe for a FOP discussion. Director Tew stated part of his duties include making the City an attractive place for a new Police Chief. He believes input from police officers makes sense although he reiterated the timing is not appropriate. Councilmember Dingman also believes input should be allowed but is not suggesting any decision or action from Council should occur until after the chief is hired. She reiterated this is a presentation only. Councilmember Smith stated it is not the Councils job to micromanage, Councils job is to set policy. He believes any employees should go through the proper channels first, including the Department Director, Human Resources, and then the Mayor. Councilmember Dingman indicated the FOP requested presentation through the Police Chief and was declined. Director Tew and Mayor Casper stated they were not approached by the FOP. Councilmember Marohn believes the Council is willing to listen to the proposal but he also believes the new chief needs to be involved. He stated the FOP does not have a legal binding organization within the City and the new chief should assist with the direction of the Police Department, whether or not unionization is involved. Mayor Casper recommended any pressing issues from the FOP be distributed to Council in written form as soon as possible. She also recommended two (2) Councilmembers with opposing views develop a presentation format. After further brief discussion, it was consensus of the Council that Councilmember Dingman will meet with Mayor Casper to establish a timeframe to proceed forward. Mayor Casper suggested any communication from the Council be submitted to herself or Councilmember Dingman. There being no further business, it was moved by Councilmember Radford, seconded by Councilmember Marohn, to adjourn the meeting at 5:37 p.m. and move into Executive Session. The Executive Session has been called pursuant to the provisions of Idaho Code Section 74-206(1)(c) To conduct deliberations concerning labor negotiations or to acquire an interest in real property which is not owned by a public agency. At the conclusion of the Executive Session Councilmembers will not reconvene to Regular Work Session. The Executive Session will be held in the City Hall Annex Conference Room. Roll call as follows: Aye – Councilmembers Hally, Smith, Dingman, Ehardt, Marohn, Radford. Nay – none. Motion carried. The City Council of the City of Idaho Falls met in Special Council Meeting (Executive Session), Monday, May 8, 2017, in the City Annex Conference Room in the City Annex Building located at 680 Park Avenue in Idaho Falls, Idaho at 5:43 p.m. There were present: Mayor Rebecca L. Noah Casper Councilmember Ed Marohn Councilmember Thomas Hally Councilmember David M. Smith Councilmember John B. Radford Councilmember Barbara Ehardt Councilmember Michelle Ziel-Dingman Also present: 5 May 8, 2017 Greg Weitzel, Parks and Recreation Director Randy Fife, City Attorney The Executive Session has been called pursuant to the provisions of Idaho Code Section 74-206(1)(c) To conduct deliberations concerning labor negotiations or to acquire an interest in real property which is not owned by a public agency. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:58 p.m. s/ Kathy Hampton s/ Rebecca L. Noah Casper CITY CLERK MAYOR 6

Agenda

Honorable Mayor and Council Brad Cramer, Director May 5, 2017 May 2, 2017, Planning Commission Action Planning Commission took the following action during the May 2, 2017 meeting. 1. RZON17-004: REZONE. Linden Park Gardens Phase 2, R-1 to R-3A. A portion of Lot 12, Block 13, Linden Park Division 8, 1st Amended. Located generally south of E 1st St., west of St Clair Rd., north of John Adams Pkwy., and east of Lincoln Dr. Recommend approval as presented. 2. PLAT17-003: PRELIMINARY PLAT. Jackson Hole Junction Preliminary Plat. Jackson Hole Junction Subdivision Preliminary Plat. Located generally south and west of Interstate 15, east of Pioneer Rd., and north of W Sunnyside Rd. Approved as presented. 3. ANNX17-003: ANNEXATION/INITIAL ZONING. Handly Avenue Annexation and Initial Zoning of R-1. Lots 1-5, Block 1, Lots 3-5, Block 2, Sunnyside Park Subdivision Division 1, & Sunnyside Park Subdivision Division 2 & Approximately 0.252 Acres NW1/4, NW1/4, Section 32, T 2N, R 38E generally south of E. Sunnyside Rd., west of S. 15th E., north of Castlerock Ln., and east of S. Holmes Ave. Recommend annexation and initial zoning of R-1 as presented. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: To receive recommendation(s) from the Planning and Zoning Commission pursuant to the Local Land Use Planning Act (LLUPA). BGC/dp cc: File Idaho Falls Sister Cities Youth Meeting April 5, 2017 Attendees: Jenna Bauer Jackie Corbridge Elly Finnigan Jacobi Retallic Karen Bauer Tate Corbridge Ian Finnigan Brooke Simpson Misty Benjamin Brennan Corbridge Fawn Molyneux Whitney St. Michel Max Benjamin Mario Estrada Gabe Padron Ian St. Michel Melinda Cebull Victoria Estrada Kendra Peck Anna St.Michel Peter Cebull Mario Estrada 2 Nathan Peck Rebecca Smith Nicholas Cebull Dave Eaton Dallin Peck Stephanie Van Ausdeln Rachel Cebull Katie Eaton Laurie Retallic Nell Villasenor Business Section of the Meeting Minutes: The minutes from the March 13th meeting were provided to the group by email. Kendra motioned to approve the minutes and Whitney seconded her motion. Treasurer’s Report: Peter provided the treasurer’s report. Balance: $5,250.36 Income: $150 JACL bento box donation, $25 membership fees Expenditures: $12.92 purchase checks, $27.97 raffle supplies Dividends: $ 0.58 Japanese Visit: Whitney told the group the Japanese students will visit from July 27th to August 2nd. Whitney sent a sheet around for people to let her know if they are able to host students this summer. If you were not at the meeting and want to host, please let Whitney know. City Funds: Dave told the group he had received an email from the city stating they plan to give us the $3500 we requested to help with hosting students. Melinda mentioned last year we were asked to send the city an invoice as part of our funding request, and she suggested we send one for their records. Peter will provide an invoice to Dave, and Dave will send it to the city. Snow Eagle Dinner/Raffle Fundraiser:  Whitney sent around a sign-up list for people to volunteer to help with decorations and ticket sales during the fundraiser.  Rebecca passed around raffle tickets for pre-sales.  Whitney has received a few more donations. She will email a list with the new donations out to the group. Mario will place pictures of the new raffle items on the website.  Melinda will call Jerry at Snow Eagle to see if we can setup raffle tables and decorations a little earlier since it will be difficult to get it done by 11:30 am if we start at 11. Friendship Garden: Kendra volunteered to coordinate work days at the Friendship Garden. Student Section of the Meeting Mario number lesson 1-ichi 2-ni 3-san 4-shi/yon 5-go 6-roku 7-shichi/nana 8-hachi 9-kyuu/ku 10-juu Mario wrote these numbers on the board and then he split the group into two groups. One person from each group went to the board with a marker. Mario would then say a number in Japanese, and the people with the markers would have to write the number in English. The team to do it first was the winner. Next game was by Nicholas This game was Jeopardy. There were five categories that had 4 different levels of questions. This was played just like any other game of jeopardy accept that there was the questions being asked not the answers being given. The five categories are phrases, Christmas, New Years, valentines/white day, other. Motion to adjourn was made by Mario Estrada and seconded by Kendra Peck. Rebecca Casper, Mayor Ryan Tew, Human Resource Department Director May 4, 2017 Summary of Insurance Information At the April 24, 2017 Council Special Meeting, A.J. Argyle and I promised the council a summary of the information that was discussed. That summary is included with this memo. ATTACHED: Summary of health insurance information presented at the April 24, 2017 City Council Work Session April 2017 City Council Health Insurance Presentation Notes  The City is insured on a One Way Retention Agreement o This has the benefits of self-insurance without the risk. o PPACA taxes are the only drawback to this arrangement  Current Premiums and Percentages are listed below. o Keep in mind H.S.A. premiums are not included in this calculation Percentage of Percentage of Employee Employee 2016-2017 Total PPO Total Total HSA Total PPO HSA Premium Premium Employee $51.15 $0.00 $558.78 90.85% 498.47 100.00% Employee & $122.59 $29.29 $1,202.72 89.81% 1072.92 97.27% Spouse Employee + 1 $76.00 $9.92 $776.99 90.22% 693.14 98.57% Child Employee + 2 $111.06 $24.69 $1,101.60 89.92% 982.71 97.49% + Children Family $182.23 $52.52 $1,713.63 89.37% 1528.68 96.56%  City’s Large Claimant Experience History o During the 2015 Calendar Year 2.9% of your population has incurred 58.3% of your claims o During the 2014 Calendar Year 2.9% of your population has incurred 52.3% of your claims o During the 2013 Calendar Year 3.6% of your population incurred 65% of your claims o During the 2012 Calendar Year 8.2% of your population incurred 62% of your claims  Notable Changes to the Plan o 2007 Increased deductible from $100 to $250 o 2010 moved from a $250 deductible wraparound plan to a $250 Basic and Major Medical deductible. This eliminated first dollar DXL, Ambulance, Outpatient services etc… Also terminated 4th quarter carryover o 2013 Combined the Basic and Major Medical Deductible increasing it to $500 overall o 2014 Changed Coinsurance to 50%, Increased Dr. Copay to $30, and added ER copay of $100. October 2014 rolled out H.S.A. o 2015 Changed deductible to $1000 and added 3 Tier drug structure. Negotiated 9.72% Increase to 4% on 8/15. Moved to Blue Cross’s formulary 4/1/16. o Negotiated 12% Increase to 2.98% Page | 1  Why the move to the H.S.A. and the large increase in deductible o Met with the mayor in 2014 and determined that if we continued on the current trajectory that we were going to hit the Cadillac tax o Hence the reason for the HSA and the increase to the deductible and the PPO o Mayor wanted to take the focus off of benefits and move the focus to wages. o Didn’t want employees seeking employment at the City of Idaho Falls strictly for benefits o This would lead to more sick employees and family members.  City Contributions compared to National Trends o 62% of employees pay more than 0% and less than 25% of the premium for single coverage o 12% of employees make no contribution to their plan for single coverage o 45% of employees pay more than 0% and less than 25% of the premium for family coverage o 15% of employees pay more than 50% of the premium for family coverage o 3% of employees make no contribution to their plan for family coverage o Covered workers on average contribute 18% of the total premium for Single coverage o Covered workers on average contribute 30% of the total premium for Family coverage o The average employee contribution for single coverage is $1,129 o The average employee contribution for family is $5,277 o Currently the city charges $0 for the H.S.A. and $613.80 (9.15%) for the PPO annually for employee only premium. o The city charges $630.24 (3.44%) annually for the H.S.A. and $2186.76 (10.63%) for the PPO for family premium o The average deductible is $1,478 for single coverage (up $160 from last year) o 48% of covered workers are enrolled in PPO’s (decreased 4% compared to 2015) o Over the last two years PPO’s have decreased 10% o 29% of covered workers are enrolled in a HDHP like an H.S.A. (increased 5% compared to 2015) o Over the last two years HDHP have increased by 8% o 39% of plans that have more than 200 employees have a deductible of at least $1,000 o 45% of workers in large firms have a deductible of $1000 or greater o 18% of plans have an out of pocket maximum of $6000 or greater o 68% of plans have an out of pocket maximum between $2000 and $6000 o 14% of plans have an out of pocket maximum of $2000 or less. o The City PPO has an out of pocket maximum of $1500 for an individual o The City H.S.A. has an out of pocket maximum of $4000 for an individual o 56% of employers offer insurance to their employees up from 55% last year but down from 57% two years ago; and 61% three years prior  National Trend Spouse Coverage o 5% of large firms say that spouses are ineligible to enroll if a spouse is offered coverage from another source o 12% of firms offering coverage to spouses have a higher contribution or cost sharing for spouses who are eligible for coverage from another source o 10% of firms offering coverage give additional compensation to employees who choose to enroll in their spouse’s plan Page | 2  H.S.A. National Trends o 7% of covered workers in an H.S.A. have a contribution equal to the single deductible o 28% of covered workers in an H.S.A. have a contribution that would reduce their deductible to less than $1,000 o The City’s contribution lowers the individual deductible to less than $1,000 not including the premium savings  Rx National Trends o 81% of plans had a three tier or more drug formulary in 2015 o Average Cost  Tier 1 $11  Tier 2 $31  Tier 3 $54  Tier 4 $93 o City’s Rx is  Tier 1 $10  Tier 2 $30  Tier 3 $50  Wellness Trends o 83% of employers that offer benefits offer at least one wellness program (weight loss program, gym membership discount or onsite facilities, biometric screening, smoking cessation, personal health coaching, flu shots, EAP etc…) o 59% of plans with over 200 employees offer a health risk assessment o 54% of plans provide financial incentive for doing so o 53% of large firms offer the opportunity to complete biometric screening o 14% offer a reward or penalty for completing the biometric screening o 16% of large firms report collecting health information from employees through wearable devices such as Fitbit or Apple Watch o 42%that offer a health and wellness program offer employees financial incentive including one or a combination of:  34% lower premiums or cost sharing  76% cash contributions to H.S.A. or merchandise  14% some other type of incentive o 26% have a maximum financial incentive of $150 or less o 35% have a maximum financial incentive of $150 to $500 o 23% have a maximum financial incentive of $500 to $1,000 o 9% have a maximum financial incentive of $1,000 to $$2,000 o 7% have a maximum financial incentive greater than $2000 o The City has a $1,000 incentive on both the PPO and H.S.A. Page | 3 V. DEFINITION AND TERMS: A. The terms and provisions used in this Policy shall have the meanings ascribed below, unless the context expressly indicates otherwise. All references to the masculine shall be deemed to include the feminine and all references to the singular form shall be deemed to include the plural. B. Terms used within this Policy shall have the meanings ascribed below: 1. “Casual Employee” means any regular employee who is assigned to work nineteen and a half (19.5) or less hours per work week. A casual employee has an unlimited length of service given they remain under the nineteen and a half (19.5) hours per work week, but is not eligible for benefits (see Table 1). 2. “Child” means a natural born child, a legally-adopted child or a child for whom an employee or his or her spouse has been appointed as guardian by a decree issued by a Court of Competent Jurisdiction. 32. “City” means the City of Idaho Falls.” 43. “Continuous Tour of Duty” means a period of any consecutive 12 months during which a full or part-time employee is assigned to work a basic work week without interruption except for any kind of leave or excused absence authorized under this Policy. 54. “Employee” means a person who is employed by the City for compensation, but excluding elective officers, volunteers and independent contractors. 65. “Full-Time Employee” means a regular employee who is assigned to work thirty-five (35) to forty (40) hours or more during a work week and is eligible for full benefits., as defined in Section X hereof. For purposes of the Affordable Care Act of 2010 and group health plan coverage only, an employee (regular or temporary) will be considered a “full-time employee” for certain application months as determined pursuant to the City’s Full-time Employees Tracking and Application Policy. 76. “Immediate Family” means: a. A spouse of an employee. b. A father or mother of the employee or a father or mother of the employee’s spouse; this includes the step-parent of an employee or spouse of an employee, provided that the step-parent has raised the employee or spouse of the employee to adulthood. c. A sister or brother of the employee or a sister or brother of the employee’s spouse. d. A child of an employee or a child of an employee’s spouse. e. A grandparent or grandchild of an employee or a grandparent or grandchild of an employee’s spouse. f. A son-in-law or daughter-in-law of an employee. This definition shall not be applicable with respect to the provisions herein regarding Family Medical Leave benefit. 87. “Part-Time Employee” means a regular employee who is assigned to work less than thirty five (35) between twenty (20) and thirty four (34) hours per work week. “Part Time 20” employees work between twenty (20) and twenty-nine (29) hours per work week and will have the option to participate in health insurance benefits at a pro-rated rate (see Table 1). “Part Time 30” employees work between thirty (30) and thirty-four (34) hours per work week and have the option to participate in health insurance benefits at a pro-rated rate (see Table 1). Employees who actually work thirty five (35) hours or more during any work week shall not be deemed to be a full-time employee, unless a change in his or her status is approved by written personnel action. . 98. “Regular Employee” means any full or part-time employee who is assigned to work a continuous and indefinite tour of duty. 109. “Retirement” means a termination of employment while eligible to receive retirement benefits under the Idaho Public Employees Retirement System. 11. “Seasonal Employee” means any employee assigned a limited position that is weather-related (as defined by PERSI) with a firm start and end date. Seasonal employees work no longer than eight (8) months (see Table 1). Employee must be terminated before the end of the eight (8) months of service, but can be rehired after a break of thirty-one (31) days. 10. “Temporary Employee” means any employee assigned a limited or non- continuous tour of duty. 121. “Stepchild” means a child of the spouse of an employee, but who is not the natural-born or adopted child of such employee. 13. “Temporary Employee” means any employee assigned a limited position that is not weather-related with a firm start and end date. Temporary employees work no longer than five (5) months (see Table 1). Employee must be terminated before the end of the five (5) months of service, but can be rehired after a break of thirty-one (31) days. Table 1. Employment Type Definitions. Status Name Hours/Week Benefits PERSI Implications Notes Regular Full Time 35-40 Full Benefits Full Participation No limitations Regular Part Time: • Part Time 20 20-29 Pro-rated Benefits Full Participation Employee pays 50% of benefits cost • Part Time 30 30-34 Pro-rated Benefits Full Participation Employee pays 25% of benefits cost Casual 19.5 or Less No Benefits No Participation Unlimited length of service Seasonal Up to 40 No Benefits No Participation* Up to 8 months max if weather-related (weather-related) Must have firm start and end date Prior to the end of 8 month max, terminate After a 31-day break in service, can rehire Temporary Up to 40 No Benefits No Participation* Up to 5 months max if NOT weather related (NOT weather- Must have firm start and end date related) Prior to the end of 5 month max, terminate After a 31-day break in service, can rehire *Employee becomes PERSI eligible only if employee works beyond the parameters listed in the table. See PERSI policy for full details or consult with the Human Resources Department.

Get email alerts for Idaho Falls

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting