City Council
Regular MeetingIdaho Falls, ID · May 8, 2017
Minutes
May 8, 2017
The City Council of the City of Idaho Falls met in Special Meeting (Council Work Session), Monday, May 8, 2017,
in the Council Chambers in the City Annex Building located at 680 Park Avenue in Idaho Falls, Idaho at 3:00 p.m.
Call to Order and Roll Call:
There were present:
Mayor Rebecca L. Noah Casper
Councilmember Barbara Ehardt
Councilmember Ed Marohn
Councilmember Thomas Hally
Councilmember John B. Radford
Councilmember David M. Smith
Councilmember Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Also present:
Ryan Tew, Human Resources Director
Chris Fredericksen, Public Works Director
Jeff Moad, Parks and Recreation Maintenance Operator
Eilene Horne, Human Resources Analyst
Dana Briggs, Economic Development Coordinator
Pamela Alexander, Municipal Services Director
Bear Prairie, Idaho Falls Power Assistant General Manager
Randy Fife, City Attorney
Kerry Hammon, Public Information Officer
Kathy Hampton, City Clerk
Mayor Casper called the meeting to order at 3:03 p.m. with the following agenda items:
Calendar, Announcements and Reports:
May 9, Arbor Day planting project
May 10, A Night at the Museum
May 11, TRPTA (Targhee Regional Public Transportation Authority)/BMPO (Bonneville Metropolitan Planning
Organization) Advisory Committee Meeting
May 11, City Council Meeting
May 13, Community College Citizens March
May 15, Officer Memorial
May 16, Election Day
May 18, City Club
May 18, ISO (Insurance Services Office) Press Conference, Fire Station No. 1 Conference Room
May 22, City Council Work Session
May 22, Mayor’s bike ride at Community Park
May 25, Idaho Falls Power Board Meeting
May 25, City Council Meeting
May 26-29, Field of Honor Flag Display at Freeman Park
May 29, Memorial Day, City holiday
Acceptance and/or Receipt of Minutes:
It was moved by Councilmember Marohn, seconded by Councilmember Hally, to accept all minutes included in the
packet. Roll call as follows: Aye – Councilmembers Dingman, Radford, Marohn, Smith, Hally, Ehardt. Nay – none.
Motion carried.
Mayor Casper stated the Blue Angels will be holding a welcome celebration on Wednesday, July 19 and a practice
session on Friday, July 21. A Veterans event will be held prior to the July 21 practice session. Horse racing events
1
May 8, 2017
will be occuring at Sandy Downs in the upcoming summer months. The July 4th parade will include several floats
from the City with a City administration/leadership entry collecting donated items/goods. Secretary of Energy Rick
Perry will be visiting DOE (Department of Energy) locations on May 9 and 10. Rose Hill Cemetery experienced
recent vandalism including damage to several grave sites and property. The possibility of establishing a donation
fund to assist with damage/costs was suggested. The first round of Police Chief interviews occurred May 8 with
additional interviews scheduled for May 11. Hiring timeframe anticipated in July-August.
Councilmember Hally stated ICUA (Idaho Consumer Owned Utilities Association) will be held July 19-21. City Club
forum on May 18 will include a presentation from the Oppenheimer Companies.
Councilmember Marohn stated the Fire Station No. 1 Grand Opening was well attended with approximately 700
people touring the facility.
Councilmember Radford expressed his appreciation to those downtown businesses who assisted with the Fire Station
Grand Opening. He stated there are several new baby animals at the Zoo.
Councilmember Ehardt had no items to report.
Councilmember Smith stated he will be attending APPA (American Public Power Association) July 19-21.
Councilmember Dingman stated the Clean and Green City-wide Cleanup campaign began May 5. The City website
has additional information for recycling and indoor/outdoor waste.
It was moved by Councilmember Dingman, seconded by Councilmember Ehardt, to modify the agenda to add
discussion of proposed Idaho Falls Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) presentation at the next work session (May 22)
with the good faith reason that the Council will not meet again before the next Work Session and the request was
recently received. Mayor Casper stated the agenda setting authority resides with the Mayor, however any action can
be requested by majority of the Council. She indicated it’s unusual for an entity who would like to be on the agenda
not to bring it to the attention of the administration. She believes the action to include this item on the agenda has
only been addressed in the media and not presented to the City. She stated no communication has occurred between
the FOP and the City administration. Councilmember Dingman believes there are several questions in general and
she does not want to delay the officers. She stated the motion would include a presentation to the Council on the topic
of potential of unionization. Mayor Casper proposed the discussion item be added to the end of agenda. Roll call as
follows: Aye – Councilmembers Dingman, Radford, Marohn, Smith, Ehardt. Nay – Councilmember Hally. Motion
carried. Mayor Casper stated all citizens have the right to communicate with the Councilmembers at any time and in
a variety of ways, unless a quasi-judicial matter is involved or any constraints of a public hearing prohibit such
comments. She believes there may be a misunderstanding that just because a public hearing is not being held that
there is no forum for Council contact, which is not the case. Councilmember Marohn reiterated that public input is
not always a public hearing. Mayor Casper stated with the recent rescission of the Civil Service System occurring
over the course of three (3) separate readings she expected communication would have taken place between each of
those meetings. Councilmember Dingman stated all Councilmember emails and phone numbers are public record
and indicated the Council are available to meet and communicate with community members.
Budget Workshop Part II: Employees Wages Discussion:
Director Tew reviewed inflation data regarding CPI (Consumer Price Index). He stated CPI is a means to measure
inflation based on goods (food, housing, fuel, clothing) that most consumers utilize and purchase on a regular basis.
He presented the following information with brief discussion throughout:
Source Inflation Reference
US Bureau of Labor CPI Actual March/2016 to https://www.bls.gov/regions/west/cpi-
Statistics March/2017: 2.4% summary/consumerpriceindex_summary_western.pdf
The Livingston Survey - CPI projected 2017: 2.4% https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/research-and-
Federal Reserve Bank of CPI projected 2018: 2.5% data/real-time-center/livingston-
Philadelphia survey/2016/livdec16.pdf?la=en
Idaho Division of CPI Projected 2017: 2.4% https://dfm.idaho.gov/publications/eab/ief/ief_apr2017.pdf
Financial Management CPI Projected 2018: 2.5% https://dfm.idaho.gov/publications/eab/ief/ief_oct2016.pdf
Forecast
2
May 8, 2017
2017 Federal Employee 2.1% http://www.fedsmith.com/2016/12/28/president-issues-
Pay Raise Issued by order-finalizing-2017-federal-employee-pay-raise/
President Obama
Director Tew stated he attempted to compare an average of other cities within the State but was unable to provide
any data due to the variety of compensation structures. He indicated any inflation increase would begin October 1.
He recommended a 2.5% inflation adjustment for City employees. Mayor Casper requested a working consensus
from the Council to build the 2.5% adjustment into the budget worksheets. There were no objections. She noted the
adjustment for the previous year was 1.75%. At the request of Councilmember Radford, Director Tew stated
1%=~$284,00, 2.5%=~$710,000. Director Tew indicated the following year the City will transition to a pay for
performance format which is market-based.
Update on Pay for Performance:
Director Tew stated in December 2016, the process for pay for performance began with performance implementation
anticipated for October 2017 with pay implementation anticipated for October 2018. He indicated the Performance
Management Task Force has been meeting on a regular basis. He then introduced Director Fredericksen and Mr.
Moad. Director Fredericksen stated the purpose of pay for performance is to foster ongoing communication and
development, to improve employees performance, and, to reward employees for their outstanding contributions. He
indicated the Task Force includes employees from the majority of City departments. Key concepts include
performance planning, ongoing communication, feedback, and documentation. Director Fredericksen believes
employees need reinforcement throughout the year for a better understanding. He indicated a draft of core
expectations for every employee has been compiled as: observable, measureable, achievable, reasonable, and,
understandable. The task force is currently reviewing job specific expectations and measurements for each
classification within the City. Goal establishment will also be reviewed. Mr. Moad expressed his appreciation for the
opportunity to participate on the task force. He stated the intent for pay for performance is to be a positive benefit for
employees as well as the City. Director Fredericksen stated concerns regarding step and grade were expressed.
Councilmember Hally indicated pay for performance is not just about wages but also direction for the employee.
Councilmember Marohn believes deadlines must be met for this process to be successful. He also believes pay for
performance will assist with career development. Director Tew commended the task force for their involvement. At
the request of Mayor Casper, Mr. Moad reviewed core values as customer service, dependability, integrity and ethics,
continuous improvement, safety, and, teamwork. He stated the task force is currently reviewing definitions of each
core value.
Personnel Manual/Policy Update:
Ms. Horne stated the proposed changes in the personnel manual are in regard to employee status. She indicated
previous confusion has occurred with the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and PERSI (Public Employee Retirement
System of Idaho) requirements. The specific definitions will determine the option to offer or not to offer benefits.
Ms. Horne reviewed the following changes:
Casual Employee, work less than 19.5 hours/week, unlimited length of service
Full-time employee, revised to be more specific (definitions will automatically meet ACA requirements)
Part-time employee, specifies number of hours worked, optional benefits would be prorated accordingly
Seasonal Employee, weather-related, length of time and number of hours
Temporary Employee, not weather-related, length of time and number of hours
After brief general discussion, Mayor Casper stated approval of this item will be included on the May 11 Council
Meeting Consent Agenda.
Community Support Grants Discussion:
Mayor Casper believes in recognizing the role for Council in support of worthwhile community endeavors. She then
turned the presentation to Ms. Briggs. Ms. Briggs stated she has performed research from other cities within the State
with regard to grant process. She proposed the following recommendations and requested Council consensus for the
current year:
3
May 8, 2017
1-Set total community support grant budget cap, proposal = $140,000. There has previously been no specific
budget amount placeholder. Last year amount = $178,999
2-Set maximum individual grant awards amount, proposal = $40,000. There is a large discrepancy in previous
awarded grants.
3-Form community panel that screens applications and then makes a recommendation to City Council,
proposal = 1-2 community members (total of 10 members) from: Art Community, Educator/Teacher, Social Services
Representative, Medical Community, Business Community, Construction/Development.
Councilmember Ehardt is in favor of a hybrid approach – set a cap amount and use of a community panel. As a
response to Councilmember Marohn, Ms. Briggs stated the bi-annual funding report is currently in place and she will
disseminate the reports to Council. Councilmember Marohn is in favor of a set cap amount. Mayor Casper reviewed
previous years and believes it is important to set a cap which would be placed into the budget for planning purposes.
Councilmember Radford would prefer a competitive bid process. Councilmember Smith prefers a cap for budgetary
purposes and believes the funding should only be given if the applicant meets the mission of the City. Brief discussion
followed regarding any special events, which would be presented as a separate operational line item in the budget.
Councilmember Dingman believes Ms. Briggs recommendation is the best practice and she would prefer to use all
three (3) proposals. Councilmember Marohn suggested the use of at-random citizens on a panel. Councilmember
Ehardt prefers citizens who have not previously served on a committee to prevent a conflict of interest. After further
brief discussion, it was consensus to have a total cap of $130,000 with individual cap of $35,000. Mayor Casper
indicated this item would continue to require approval in the budget, allocating funds from the General Fund.
2018 Audit Planning Discussion:
Director Alexander stated the City has historically used two auditors, one for the electric power and one for
government business. She stated in July 2016 a Request For Proposal (RFP) was issued for a comprehensive auditor,
four (4) proposals were received. An evaluation panel, as well as auditing staff, recommended Moss Adams, taking
into account their knowledge of the Cayenta software system. Director Alexander indicated at that time feedback was
received from some Councilmembers regarding the lack of using a local auditing firm. She stated Moss Adams had
not previously audited the government aspect and they began identifying issues which required additional testing.
She reviewed the costs, stating costs are approximately $20,000 over the estimate due to the additional testing and
travel, which amounts to a 17% increase of total contract cost. Brief discussion followed regarding the preference to
retain an auditor for more than one (1) year to maintain familiarity. There was consensus of the Council to retain
Moss Adams. Mayor Casper expressed her appreciation to Director Alexander for her capable management skills.
Acceptance of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Contract:
Mr. Prairie recognized the assistance of Mindy Moore, Human Resources (HR) staff. He stated the majority of
contract changes focused on the wage structure. The journeyman structure is now on a tier scale, including four (4)
levels of journeymen. Overall wages, benefits, and health insurance came in under a 2.5% increase. Most positions
will receive a 2% compensation, with some lead positions receiving 5% compensation. Senior Hydro Mechanic and
Senior Meter Technician were created as new positions. Mr. Prairie indicated there was overcompensation for
apprentices compared to market so they will not receive the 2% increase but will continue to increase their rates as
training occurs. Language was established on living distance requirement related to use of trouble truck and relocation
conditions. Insurance premiums increase will be a shared cost.
It was moved by Councilmember Smith, seconded by Councilmember Hally, to approve the Collective Bargaining
Agreement with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 57 for the 2017-18 bargaining year, and
give authorization for the Mayor to execute the document. Roll call as follows: Aye – Councilmembers Radford,
Ehardt, Smith, Marohn, Dingman, Hally. Nay – none. Motion carried.
Discussion Regarding FOP Presentation:
Councilmember Hally believes the new chief should get acquainted with personnel and current issues prior to this
discussion. Councilmember Dingman stated she participated on the interview panel for the Police Chief position and
indicated the candidates have variety of backgrounds, some having similar experiences with the current issues. She
4
May 8, 2017
believes it would be ideal to have a new chief in place who would work with the employees prior to any Union
moving forward. She stated the request, on behalf of the FOP, is to be placed on an agenda to discuss being recognized
as a union within the next 2-3 weeks if possible. Per Councilmember Dingman’s conversation with Dustin Howell,
vice-president of the FOP, Mr. Howell indicated the FOP would like to present the concept, the research that has been
conducted, and to communicate with the Council in a presentation format. There would be no expectation of action
or decision, this would be a presentation only. Director Tew stated although he’s interested in hearing from the FOP
he would recommend to wait for a new chief as he believes it doesn't make sense to have a presentation now.
Councilmember Dingman indicated other presentations, such as the School District or Airshow Board, have occurred
without hesitation. Mayor Casper believes this is a matter of precedence and procedure. She stated presentations have
occurred to further a City purpose or further the work of a department(s). She believes in this case, action is only
being heard through media. She prefers to continue the current process of presentation through a Department Director
or the Council President with the agenda setting determined by the mayor. Mayor Casper stated her commitment and
obligation is for robust discussion of any request if that is the will of council but believes all bases (legal, HR,
community) need to be covered. Brief discussion followed regarding a timeframe for a FOP discussion. Director Tew
stated part of his duties include making the City an attractive place for a new Police Chief. He believes input from
police officers makes sense although he reiterated the timing is not appropriate. Councilmember Dingman also
believes input should be allowed but is not suggesting any decision or action from Council should occur until after
the chief is hired. She reiterated this is a presentation only. Councilmember Smith stated it is not the Councils job to
micromanage, Councils job is to set policy. He believes any employees should go through the proper channels first,
including the Department Director, Human Resources, and then the Mayor. Councilmember Dingman indicated the
FOP requested presentation through the Police Chief and was declined. Director Tew and Mayor Casper stated they
were not approached by the FOP. Councilmember Marohn believes the Council is willing to listen to the proposal
but he also believes the new chief needs to be involved. He stated the FOP does not have a legal binding organization
within the City and the new chief should assist with the direction of the Police Department, whether or not
unionization is involved. Mayor Casper recommended any pressing issues from the FOP be distributed to Council in
written form as soon as possible. She also recommended two (2) Councilmembers with opposing views develop a
presentation format. After further brief discussion, it was consensus of the Council that Councilmember Dingman
will meet with Mayor Casper to establish a timeframe to proceed forward. Mayor Casper suggested any
communication from the Council be submitted to herself or Councilmember Dingman.
There being no further business, it was moved by Councilmember Radford, seconded by Councilmember Marohn, to
adjourn the meeting at 5:37 p.m. and move into Executive Session. The Executive Session has been called pursuant
to the provisions of Idaho Code Section 74-206(1)(c) To conduct deliberations concerning labor negotiations or to
acquire an interest in real property which is not owned by a public agency. At the conclusion of the Executive Session
Councilmembers will not reconvene to Regular Work Session. The Executive Session will be held in the City Hall
Annex Conference Room. Roll call as follows: Aye – Councilmembers Hally, Smith, Dingman, Ehardt, Marohn,
Radford. Nay – none. Motion carried.
The City Council of the City of Idaho Falls met in Special Council Meeting (Executive Session), Monday, May 8,
2017, in the City Annex Conference Room in the City Annex Building located at 680 Park Avenue in Idaho Falls,
Idaho at 5:43 p.m.
There were present:
Mayor Rebecca L. Noah Casper
Councilmember Ed Marohn
Councilmember Thomas Hally
Councilmember David M. Smith
Councilmember John B. Radford
Councilmember Barbara Ehardt
Councilmember Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Also present:
5
May 8, 2017
Greg Weitzel, Parks and Recreation Director
Randy Fife, City Attorney
The Executive Session has been called pursuant to the provisions of Idaho Code Section 74-206(1)(c) To conduct
deliberations concerning labor negotiations or to acquire an interest in real property which is not owned by a public
agency.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:58 p.m.
s/ Kathy Hampton s/ Rebecca L. Noah Casper
CITY CLERK MAYOR
6
Agenda
Honorable Mayor and Council
Brad Cramer, Director
May 5, 2017
May 2, 2017, Planning Commission Action
Planning Commission took the following action during the May 2, 2017 meeting.
1. RZON17-004: REZONE. Linden Park Gardens Phase 2, R-1 to R-3A. A portion of Lot 12,
Block 13, Linden Park Division 8, 1st Amended. Located generally south of E 1st St., west of St
Clair Rd., north of John Adams Pkwy., and east of Lincoln Dr. Recommend approval as
presented.
2. PLAT17-003: PRELIMINARY PLAT. Jackson Hole Junction Preliminary Plat. Jackson
Hole Junction Subdivision Preliminary Plat. Located generally south and west of Interstate 15,
east of Pioneer Rd., and north of W Sunnyside Rd. Approved as presented.
3. ANNX17-003: ANNEXATION/INITIAL ZONING. Handly Avenue Annexation and Initial
Zoning of R-1. Lots 1-5, Block 1, Lots 3-5, Block 2, Sunnyside Park Subdivision Division 1, &
Sunnyside Park Subdivision Division 2 & Approximately 0.252 Acres NW1/4, NW1/4, Section
32, T 2N, R 38E generally south of E. Sunnyside Rd., west of S. 15th E., north of Castlerock Ln.,
and east of S. Holmes Ave. Recommend annexation and initial zoning of R-1 as presented.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: To receive recommendation(s) from the Planning and
Zoning Commission pursuant to the Local Land Use Planning Act (LLUPA).
BGC/dp
cc: File
Idaho Falls Sister Cities Youth Meeting
April 5, 2017
Attendees:
Jenna Bauer Jackie Corbridge Elly Finnigan Jacobi Retallic
Karen Bauer Tate Corbridge Ian Finnigan Brooke Simpson
Misty Benjamin Brennan Corbridge Fawn Molyneux Whitney St. Michel
Max Benjamin Mario Estrada Gabe Padron Ian St. Michel
Melinda Cebull Victoria Estrada Kendra Peck Anna St.Michel
Peter Cebull Mario Estrada 2 Nathan Peck Rebecca Smith
Nicholas Cebull Dave Eaton Dallin Peck Stephanie Van Ausdeln
Rachel Cebull Katie Eaton Laurie Retallic Nell Villasenor
Business Section of the Meeting
Minutes:
The minutes from the March 13th meeting were provided to the group by email. Kendra motioned to
approve the minutes and Whitney seconded her motion.
Treasurer’s Report:
Peter provided the treasurer’s report.
Balance: $5,250.36
Income: $150 JACL bento box donation, $25 membership fees
Expenditures: $12.92 purchase checks, $27.97 raffle supplies
Dividends: $ 0.58
Japanese Visit: Whitney told the group the Japanese students will visit from July 27th to August 2nd.
Whitney sent a sheet around for people to let her know if they are able to host students this summer. If
you were not at the meeting and want to host, please let Whitney know.
City Funds: Dave told the group he had received an email from the city stating they plan to give us the
$3500 we requested to help with hosting students. Melinda mentioned last year we were asked to send
the city an invoice as part of our funding request, and she suggested we send one for their records.
Peter will provide an invoice to Dave, and Dave will send it to the city.
Snow Eagle Dinner/Raffle Fundraiser:
Whitney sent around a sign-up list for people to volunteer to help with decorations and ticket
sales during the fundraiser.
Rebecca passed around raffle tickets for pre-sales.
Whitney has received a few more donations. She will email a list with the new donations out to
the group. Mario will place pictures of the new raffle items on the website.
Melinda will call Jerry at Snow Eagle to see if we can setup raffle tables and decorations a little
earlier since it will be difficult to get it done by 11:30 am if we start at 11.
Friendship Garden: Kendra volunteered to coordinate work days at the Friendship Garden.
Student Section of the Meeting
Mario number lesson
1-ichi
2-ni
3-san
4-shi/yon
5-go
6-roku
7-shichi/nana
8-hachi
9-kyuu/ku
10-juu
Mario wrote these numbers on the board and then he split the group into two groups. One
person from each group went to the board with a marker. Mario would then say a number in Japanese,
and the people with the markers would have to write the number in English. The team to do it first was
the winner.
Next game was by Nicholas
This game was Jeopardy. There were five categories that had 4 different levels of questions. This
was played just like any other game of jeopardy accept that there was the questions being asked not the
answers being given. The five categories are phrases, Christmas, New Years, valentines/white day, other.
Motion to adjourn was made by Mario Estrada and seconded by Kendra Peck.
Rebecca Casper, Mayor
Ryan Tew, Human Resource Department Director
May 4, 2017
Summary of Insurance Information
At the April 24, 2017 Council Special Meeting, A.J. Argyle and I promised the council a summary of
the information that was discussed. That summary is included with this memo.
ATTACHED: Summary of health insurance information presented at the April 24, 2017 City Council
Work Session
April 2017 City Council Health Insurance Presentation Notes
The City is insured on a One Way Retention Agreement
o This has the benefits of self-insurance without the risk.
o PPACA taxes are the only drawback to this arrangement
Current Premiums and Percentages are listed below.
o Keep in mind H.S.A. premiums are not included in this calculation
Percentage of Percentage of
Employee Employee
2016-2017 Total PPO Total Total HSA Total
PPO HSA
Premium Premium
Employee $51.15 $0.00 $558.78 90.85% 498.47 100.00%
Employee &
$122.59 $29.29 $1,202.72 89.81% 1072.92 97.27%
Spouse
Employee + 1
$76.00 $9.92 $776.99 90.22% 693.14 98.57%
Child
Employee + 2
$111.06 $24.69 $1,101.60 89.92% 982.71 97.49%
+ Children
Family $182.23 $52.52 $1,713.63 89.37% 1528.68 96.56%
City’s Large Claimant Experience History
o During the 2015 Calendar Year 2.9% of your population has incurred 58.3% of your claims
o During the 2014 Calendar Year 2.9% of your population has incurred 52.3% of your claims
o During the 2013 Calendar Year 3.6% of your population incurred 65% of your claims
o During the 2012 Calendar Year 8.2% of your population incurred 62% of your claims
Notable Changes to the Plan
o 2007 Increased deductible from $100 to $250
o 2010 moved from a $250 deductible wraparound plan to a $250 Basic and Major Medical
deductible. This eliminated first dollar DXL, Ambulance, Outpatient services etc…
Also terminated 4th quarter carryover
o 2013 Combined the Basic and Major Medical Deductible increasing it to $500 overall
o 2014 Changed Coinsurance to 50%, Increased Dr. Copay to $30, and added ER copay of $100.
October 2014 rolled out H.S.A.
o 2015 Changed deductible to $1000 and added 3 Tier drug structure. Negotiated 9.72% Increase
to 4% on 8/15. Moved to Blue Cross’s formulary 4/1/16.
o Negotiated 12% Increase to 2.98%
Page | 1
Why the move to the H.S.A. and the large increase in deductible
o Met with the mayor in 2014 and determined that if we continued on the current trajectory that we
were going to hit the Cadillac tax
o Hence the reason for the HSA and the increase to the deductible and the PPO
o Mayor wanted to take the focus off of benefits and move the focus to wages.
o Didn’t want employees seeking employment at the City of Idaho Falls strictly for benefits
o This would lead to more sick employees and family members.
City Contributions compared to National Trends
o 62% of employees pay more than 0% and less than 25% of the premium for single coverage
o 12% of employees make no contribution to their plan for single coverage
o 45% of employees pay more than 0% and less than 25% of the premium for family coverage
o 15% of employees pay more than 50% of the premium for family coverage
o 3% of employees make no contribution to their plan for family coverage
o Covered workers on average contribute 18% of the total premium for Single coverage
o Covered workers on average contribute 30% of the total premium for Family coverage
o The average employee contribution for single coverage is $1,129
o The average employee contribution for family is $5,277
o Currently the city charges $0 for the H.S.A. and $613.80 (9.15%) for the PPO annually for
employee only premium.
o The city charges $630.24 (3.44%) annually for the H.S.A. and $2186.76 (10.63%) for the PPO
for family premium
o The average deductible is $1,478 for single coverage (up $160 from last year)
o 48% of covered workers are enrolled in PPO’s (decreased 4% compared to 2015)
o Over the last two years PPO’s have decreased 10%
o 29% of covered workers are enrolled in a HDHP like an H.S.A. (increased 5% compared to
2015)
o Over the last two years HDHP have increased by 8%
o 39% of plans that have more than 200 employees have a deductible of at least $1,000
o 45% of workers in large firms have a deductible of $1000 or greater
o 18% of plans have an out of pocket maximum of $6000 or greater
o 68% of plans have an out of pocket maximum between $2000 and $6000
o 14% of plans have an out of pocket maximum of $2000 or less.
o The City PPO has an out of pocket maximum of $1500 for an individual
o The City H.S.A. has an out of pocket maximum of $4000 for an individual
o 56% of employers offer insurance to their employees up from 55% last year but down from 57%
two years ago; and 61% three years prior
National Trend Spouse Coverage
o 5% of large firms say that spouses are ineligible to enroll if a spouse is offered coverage from
another source
o 12% of firms offering coverage to spouses have a higher contribution or cost sharing for spouses
who are eligible for coverage from another source
o 10% of firms offering coverage give additional compensation to employees who choose to enroll
in their spouse’s plan
Page | 2
H.S.A. National Trends
o 7% of covered workers in an H.S.A. have a contribution equal to the single deductible
o 28% of covered workers in an H.S.A. have a contribution that would reduce their deductible to
less than $1,000
o The City’s contribution lowers the individual deductible to less than $1,000 not including the
premium savings
Rx National Trends
o 81% of plans had a three tier or more drug formulary in 2015
o Average Cost
Tier 1 $11
Tier 2 $31
Tier 3 $54
Tier 4 $93
o City’s Rx is
Tier 1 $10
Tier 2 $30
Tier 3 $50
Wellness Trends
o 83% of employers that offer benefits offer at least one wellness program (weight loss program,
gym membership discount or onsite facilities, biometric screening, smoking cessation, personal
health coaching, flu shots, EAP etc…)
o 59% of plans with over 200 employees offer a health risk assessment
o 54% of plans provide financial incentive for doing so
o 53% of large firms offer the opportunity to complete biometric screening
o 14% offer a reward or penalty for completing the biometric screening
o 16% of large firms report collecting health information from employees through wearable
devices such as Fitbit or Apple Watch
o 42%that offer a health and wellness program offer employees financial incentive including one
or a combination of:
34% lower premiums or cost sharing
76% cash contributions to H.S.A. or merchandise
14% some other type of incentive
o 26% have a maximum financial incentive of $150 or less
o 35% have a maximum financial incentive of $150 to $500
o 23% have a maximum financial incentive of $500 to $1,000
o 9% have a maximum financial incentive of $1,000 to $$2,000
o 7% have a maximum financial incentive greater than $2000
o The City has a $1,000 incentive on both the PPO and H.S.A.
Page | 3
V. DEFINITION AND TERMS:
A. The terms and provisions used in this Policy shall have the meanings ascribed below,
unless the context expressly indicates otherwise. All references to the masculine shall
be deemed to include the feminine and all references to the singular form shall be
deemed to include the plural.
B. Terms used within this Policy shall have the meanings ascribed below:
1. “Casual Employee” means any regular employee who is assigned to work
nineteen and a half (19.5) or less hours per work week. A casual employee has
an unlimited length of service given they remain under the nineteen and a half
(19.5) hours per work week, but is not eligible for benefits (see Table 1).
2. “Child” means a natural born child, a legally-adopted child or a child for whom
an employee or his or her spouse has been appointed as guardian by a decree
issued by a Court of Competent Jurisdiction.
32. “City” means the City of Idaho Falls.”
43. “Continuous Tour of Duty” means a period of any consecutive 12 months during
which a full or part-time employee is assigned to work a basic work week
without interruption except for any kind of leave or excused absence authorized
under this Policy.
54. “Employee” means a person who is employed by the City for compensation, but
excluding elective officers, volunteers and independent contractors.
65. “Full-Time Employee” means a regular employee who is assigned to work
thirty-five (35) to forty (40) hours or more during a work week and is eligible
for full benefits., as defined in Section X hereof. For purposes of the Affordable
Care Act of 2010 and group health plan coverage only, an employee (regular or
temporary) will be considered a “full-time employee” for certain application
months as determined pursuant to the City’s Full-time Employees Tracking and
Application Policy.
76. “Immediate Family” means:
a. A spouse of an employee.
b. A father or mother of the employee or a father or mother of the employee’s
spouse; this includes the step-parent of an employee or spouse of an
employee, provided that the step-parent has raised the employee or spouse
of the employee to adulthood.
c. A sister or brother of the employee or a sister or brother of the employee’s
spouse.
d. A child of an employee or a child of an employee’s spouse.
e. A grandparent or grandchild of an employee or a grandparent or
grandchild of an employee’s spouse.
f. A son-in-law or daughter-in-law of an employee.
This definition shall not be applicable with respect to the provisions herein
regarding Family Medical Leave benefit.
87. “Part-Time Employee” means a regular employee who is assigned to work less
than thirty five (35) between twenty (20) and thirty four (34) hours per work
week. “Part Time 20” employees work between twenty (20) and twenty-nine
(29) hours per work week and will have the option to participate in health
insurance benefits at a pro-rated rate (see Table 1). “Part Time 30” employees
work between thirty (30) and thirty-four (34) hours per work week and have
the option to participate in health insurance benefits at a pro-rated rate (see
Table 1). Employees who actually work thirty five (35) hours or more during
any work week shall not be deemed to be a full-time employee, unless a
change in his or her status is approved by written personnel action.
.
98. “Regular Employee” means any full or part-time employee who is assigned to
work a continuous and indefinite tour of duty.
109. “Retirement” means a termination of employment while eligible to receive
retirement benefits under the Idaho Public Employees Retirement System.
11. “Seasonal Employee” means any employee assigned a limited position that is
weather-related (as defined by PERSI) with a firm start and end date. Seasonal
employees work no longer than eight (8) months (see Table 1). Employee must
be terminated before the end of the eight (8) months of service, but can be
rehired after a break of thirty-one (31) days.
10. “Temporary Employee” means any employee assigned a limited or non-
continuous tour of duty.
121. “Stepchild” means a child of the spouse of an employee, but who is not the
natural-born or adopted child of such employee.
13. “Temporary Employee” means any employee assigned a limited position that
is not weather-related with a firm start and end date. Temporary employees
work no longer than five (5) months (see Table 1). Employee must be
terminated before the end of the five (5) months of service, but can be rehired
after a break of thirty-one (31) days.
Table 1. Employment Type Definitions.
Status Name Hours/Week Benefits PERSI Implications Notes
Regular Full Time 35-40 Full Benefits Full Participation No limitations
Regular Part Time:
• Part Time 20 20-29 Pro-rated Benefits Full Participation Employee pays 50% of benefits cost
• Part Time 30 30-34 Pro-rated Benefits Full Participation Employee pays 25% of benefits cost
Casual 19.5 or Less No Benefits No Participation Unlimited length of service
Seasonal Up to 40 No Benefits No Participation* Up to 8 months max if weather-related
(weather-related) Must have firm start and end date
Prior to the end of 8 month max, terminate
After a 31-day break in service, can rehire
Temporary Up to 40 No Benefits No Participation* Up to 5 months max if NOT weather related
(NOT weather- Must have firm start and end date
related) Prior to the end of 5 month max, terminate
After a 31-day break in service, can rehire
*Employee becomes PERSI eligible only if employee works beyond the parameters listed in the table. See PERSI policy for full details or consult
with the Human Resources Department.
Get email alerts for Idaho Falls
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.