Muyni
← Back to Idaho Falls

City Council

Regular Meeting

Idaho Falls, ID · July 24, 2017

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

July 24, 2017 The City Council of the City of Idaho Falls met in Special Meeting (Council Work Session), Monday, July 24, 2017, in the Council Chambers in the City Annex Building located at 680 Park Avenue in Idaho Falls, Idaho at 3:00 p.m. Call to Order and Roll Call: There were present: Mayor Rebecca L. Noah Casper Councilmember David M. Smith Councilmember Thomas Hally Councilmember Michelle Ziel-Dingman Councilmember John B. Radford Councilmember Barbara Ehardt Councilmember Ed Marohn Also present: Pamela Alexander, Municipal Services Director Chandra Witt, General Services Administrator Chris Fredericksen, Public Works Director Mark Hagedorn, Controller Kenny McOmber, Treasurer Greg Wietzel, Parks and Recreation Director Brent Martin, Parks Superintendent Scott Davis, Cemetery Sexton Delbert Lloyd, Horticulturist/Urban Forester Randy Fife, City Attorney Kathy Hampton, City Clerk Mayor Casper called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. with the following agenda items: Calendar, Announcements and Reports: Mayor Casper announced Holly Cook is temporarily filling in as the Executive Assistant in the Mayor’s Office. She stated the recent Blue Thunder Air Show was very successful. She shared acknowledgment of City staff assistance and recognized assistance from all City divisions. She briefly reviewed additional recent events including: the Great Race for Education, fundraiser for College of Eastern Idaho (CEI); Guns and Hoses fundraiser; Cady Tucker-Run in the Spirit fundraiser which also included a presentation of Automated External Defibrillators (AED) and PulsePoint app demonstration from Fire Department Captain/Paramedic Rob Hall; Art Show, in conjunction with the Farmers Market; and, Pickle Ball dedication at Lincoln Park. July 25 and 26, Budget Work Sessions July 26, public meeting for the Eclipse July 27, Idaho Falls Power (IFP) Board Meeting and, City Council Meeting July 28, Sister Cities Youth Delegation welcome picnic July 28 and 29, POW/MIA rally August 2, War Bonnet Roundup Kickoff Party in the downtown area August 3-5, War Bonnet Roundup August 3, City Benefits Fair at the Ice Arena August 29, City employee picnic Mayor Casper stated Police Chief Mark McBride officially announced his retirement day as August 24. The new Police Chief, Bryce Johnson, will begin working for the City on August 14. Mayor Casper stated a flyer was recently distributed at the Farmers Market regarding white supremacy and intolerance. She indicated she received a request from a congregation to take a stance against this action. However, she stated the flyer did not violate any free speech laws, therefore the City cannot condemn the free speech rights. Any individual can condemn on an individual basis 1 July 24, 2017 but not on behalf of the City. Mr. Fife stated a resolution could be drafted but caution would be required for appropriate language. Mayor Casper requested any Councilmembers who may be in favor of a resolution contact the Legal Department. Brief discussion followed. Councilmember Hally reminded the Council to contact Mindy Moore, Human Resources Analyst, with any input regarding the benefits package/policy. Councilmember Marohn expressed his appreciation for those who participated at the veterans VIP day at the Blue Thunder Air Show. There were an estimated 3000-5000 attendees for this VIP event. Councilmember Smith stated the July 26 IFP Board Meeting will include additional Strategic Planning presentation. Councilmember Ehardt had no items to report. Councilmember Radford stated the Idaho Falls Zoo is anticipating another year of record attendance. Councilmember Dingman had no items to report. Acceptance and/or Receipt of Minutes: It was moved by Councilmember Marohn, seconded by Councilmember Smith, to receive the recommendations from the Planning and Zoning Commission pursuant to the Local Land Use Planning Act. Roll call as follows: Aye – Councilmembers Radford, Ehardt, Hally, Smith, Marohn, Dingman. Nay – none. Motion carried. AssetWorks Professional Services and Software Agreement Follow-up Discussion: Director Alexander stated the original proposal for funding this agreement was to utilize the Municipal Equipment Replacement Fund (MERF). Total purchase for the software = $124,987.84; annual software maintenance = $10,660. She believes this will be a multi-year project which will include funding from FY2016/17 and FY2017/18. Ms. Witt stated approximately 730 pieces of equipment are being tracked and are currently located in the MERF. She indicated spreadsheets and HTE are currently being used for this tracking system. She stated the HTE system experienced a failure, lasting for approximately 18 months, which eliminated any tracking ability. Director Alexander stated the Fleet Management System will replace the current HTE system. This system will also integrate with the Cayenta system, will integrate with Fuel Master and NetworkFleet (GPS tracking), will provide accurate data for scheduling preventative maintenance and repairs, and, will provide departments access to fleet information at any time. She briefly reviewed the fleet management system proposed funding. She stated recommended funding for this purchase includes: Option 1 – MERF Option 2 – forecasted savings in fuel and lubricants budget Total budget = $1m Expended through June = $619,868 Forecast for September 30 = $846,490 Estimated savings = $153,510 Director Alexander briefly reviewed the AssetWorks ownership/depreciation and recurring costs capabilities. Ms. Witt stated the HTE does not currently have a deprecation capability, therefore an annual review of equipment is conducted within each Department. She also stated there is not a current maintenance tracking system and each piece of equipment has to be manually tracked. She believes this software system will be very helpful pertaining to the preventative maintenance schedules. She stated this Fleet Management System is widely used by other organizations and companies. General discussion and comments followed. Ms. Witt stated, per the agreement, a license will be required for each piece of equipment. She does not believe the amount of equipment will exceed the number of licenses. After further brief comments, it was consensus of the Council to utilize the forecasted savings from the fuel and lubricants budget. This item will be included on the July 27 Council Meeting agenda. Quarterly Finance Presentation: Director Alexander turned the presentation to Mr. Hagedorn for overview of revenue and expenditures for third quarter as follows with general discussion throughout: Mr. Hagedorn stated the forecast for revenue projection takes five (5) years of actual with projection of two (2) years. 2 July 24, 2017 Budget to Actual Revenue 2016/17 Budget Year to Date Percentage Expended Year-End Forecast $154,814,615 $112,973,438 72.97% $143,551,831 Mr. Hagedorn indicated the projected Taxes and Franchise Fees will be less than projected due to timing in collections. Projected taxes includes Recreational Fund, Library, Municipal Capital Improvement, Streets Fund, and the General Fund. Intergovernmental Revenue is related to potential grants. Government Charges for Services, as well as Enterprise Charges for Services, is similar to the previous year. Mr. Hagedorn stated, due to outgoing and incoming revenues throughout the year, all Non-Revenue Transfers will be grouped together at year end. Budget to Actual Expenditures 2016/17 Budget Year to Date Percentage Expended Year-End Forecast $195,194,467 $112,716,488 58% $159,662,956 Mr. Hagedorn stated Wages/Benefits costs have reduced due to the demographic shift of employees. He indicated Enterprise Funds are situational which affects Operating Benefits and Capital Outlay balances. MERF depreciation is accurate. Debt Service remains the same amount each year. He stated General Fund expenditures are approximately 75% but has increased approximately 9% from the previous year although revenues have decreased. Director Alexander stated large expenses from the General Fund have included the construction of Fire Station No. 1 and the excessive snow removal season. Mr. McOmber reviewed the Total Fund Balance for the previous ten (10) years. He stated total City reserve funds have been decreasing and he expressed his concern for the decrease of the General Fund as the trend is continuing downward. Mayor Casper believes the change of the accounting process over the course of years may contribute to the decreasing amounts. Mr. Hagedorn stated the spread is approximately $8m. Approximately $4.6m was transferred to the Street Department, $1.5m was budgeted for capital projects, and the remaining $2m is due to various, more complicated expenditures. Councilmember Hally believes the General Fund was built up during the recession due to items being postponed. He believes those items are now being completed, through depreciation or new construction. Mr. McOmber concurred although he did not anticipate the current low balance. Brief discussion followed. Mr. McOmber briefly reviewed Total Fund Balance by each Fund. He stated investments are doing well with a general return at approximately 2%. He indicated the main goal of City (public) funds is preservation, not gains. Cemetery and Memorial Tree Discussion: Director Weitzel stated the Parks and Recreation (P&R) Department is currently working to formalize a remembrance tree and bench program. The draft program would require Remembrance Trees be approximately 2.5-3.0 in diameter and 5-6 feet tall. Each tree would cost $400 each. Mr. Lloyd stated the City assists the family with the planting and care of the tree. The tree is then included into the GPS (Global Positioning System) inventory program as it becomes the property of the City. Tree planting is dependent on weather and seasonal conditions. Mr. Davis reviewed the current procedure of the cemetery and memorial trees. He indicated the cemetery is trying to protect the personal property of cemetery decorations but would like a better policy as decorations and other debris make it difficult for staff clean up. He stated valuable items are retained. Director Weitzel reviewed the current policy regarding decorations of plots and graves for the observed holidays. Mr. Fife stated options could include a written inter-departmental policy, a resolution approved by Council, or an ordinance. He recommended a resolution or a P&R policy. He stated any resolution or policy needs to be fair, consistent, and fair-minded to inform people of expectations in order to manage individual behaviors. He stated a resolution could not be changed as easily as a P&R policy. After brief discussion, it was consensus of the Council to approve a resolution outlining a policy. Naming Rights Resolution: Director Weitzel briefly reviewed the purpose and definitions of the proposed resolution. The proposed resolution also defines three (3) categories of naming requests as Historic Events, People/Group, and Places; Outstanding Individuals; or Major Donations. Director Weitzel briefly reviewed the procedures including general principles; renaming a City facility, park or location; or other considerations. He reviewed the application contents, the application processing steps, and the approval process required by the Council. 3 July 24, 2017 Mr. Fife stated the resolution would be a guideline. Brief discussion followed regarding the use of company logos and the approval process. Mr. Fife stated a resolution was previously written specifically for Parks and Recreation, as the majority of requests involve Parks and Recreation facilities, but at that time it was decided by the Council that the resolution should be broadened to include other City facilities. General brief comments followed. Mayor Casper stated this item will be included on the July 27 Council Meeting agenda. There being no further business, it was moved by Councilmember Hally, seconded by Councilmember Marohn, that the meeting adjourn at 5:38 p.m. s/ Kathy Hampton s/ Rebecca L. Noah Casper CITY CLERK MAYOR 4

Agenda

RESOLUTION NO. 2017- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, ESTABLISHING A POLICY FOR THE NAMING OF CITY FACILITIES, PARKS, AND LOCATIONS; AND PROVIDING THAT THIS RESOLUTION BE EFFECTIVE UPON ITS PASSAGE, APPROVAL AND PUBLICATION ACCORDING TO LAW. WHEREAS, the naming or renaming of City facilities, parks, and locations is sometimes complex and sometimes emotionally evocative; and WHEREAS, assigning a name is a powerful and permanent identity for a public place and/or facility and often requires significant resources in terms of changing names on signs, maps, and literature; and WHEREAS, in addition, excessive changing of facility, park, or location names can be the source of confusion to the public; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to establish a policy that provides guidance to those that have an interest in the naming and or renaming of the City’s facilities, parks, or locations; and WHEREAS, to set out a process for consideration and predictable, appropriate, and orderly naming of City facilities, parks, or locations that is fair and meets community needs and expectations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, AS FOLLOWS: I. PURPOSE The purpose of this Policy is to provide guidance to those that have an interest in the naming and or renaming of a City facility, park, or location and to set out an orderly process for consideration and potential adoption of a City facility name. Nothing in this Policy shall alter the naming of City subdivisions, streets, or other features within plats. II. DEFINITIONS The following definitions apply to this Policy: Donations. A donation of property, goods, services, or funds generally with no expectation of return. Facilities. Major or important physical structures owned or permanently controlled by the City, such as community centers, aquatic facilities, pavilions, zoos, tennis courts, bridges, kiosks, gardens, displays, trees, landscaping, water walls, retention ponds, monuments, sculptures, fountains, and the like. NAMING OR RENAMING OF A CITY FACILITY PAGE 1 OF 6 Location. Any real property owned or permanently controlled by the City, including but not limited to parks, sports fields, pathways, undeveloped City properties, fields, walkways, open spaces, streams, bodies of water, and the like. Naming. The permanent name given to a facility, City park, or location assigned by the Council through a Resolution. Parks. All traditionally designed parks, gardens, natural open spaces, and specialized parks under the stewardship of the City Parks and Recreation Department or the City. Parks and Recreation Commission. Commission established by the City to review, advise, recommend, and promote activities within the Parks and Recreation Department, including recreational facility, park, and location naming. Note: For purposes of this Policy, facilities, parks, and locations are not mutually exclusive and may be combined for consideration. III. POLICY It is City policy to reserve the naming or renaming of City facilities or locations for circumstances that best serve the interests of the City and those that ensure a worthy and enduring legacy. A. Category The City supports the consideration by City staff and elected officials of naming requests within the following categories: 1. Historic Events, People/Group, and Places a. The history of a major event, people/group, or place may play an important role in the naming or renaming of a City facility or location because communities often wish to preserve and honor the history of a neighborhood, the City, its founders, other historical figures, its heritage, local landmarks, prominent geographical locations, and natural and geological features. b. When a City facility is associated with or located near events, people/group, and places of historic, cultural, or social significance, consideration will be given to naming that facility after such events, people/group, or place. In considering proposals, the relationship of the event, people/group or place to the City facility must be supported and demonstrated through research and documentation. 2. Outstanding Individuals a. The City has benefited from the contributions (in various forms) made by outstanding individuals. This category is designed to acknowledge a sustained and NAMING OR RENAMING OF A CITY FACILITY PAGE 2 OF 6 notable contribution to the community that has been made by such outstanding individuals. b. Naming or renaming a facility, park, or location for an outstanding individual is encouraged only for those who have been deceased for at least three (3) years prior to first consideration. The individual’s significance and good reputation must be widely recognized within the City, county, state, or nation’s history. c. When considering the naming or renaming of a City facility, park, or location after a deceased individual, priority will be given to those who made a sustained and lasting contribution to the City of Idaho Falls, Bonneville County, or the east Idaho region; or the State of Idaho; or the nation. 3. Major Donations a. The City benefits from the generosity of its residents, businesses, and foundations. On occasion, the significance of donation may warrant consideration of requests from either the donor or another party to acknowledge such a gift by the naming of a City facility, park, or location in an appropriate manner. b. From time to time, a significant donation may be made to the City that will add considerable value to the City, the City park and recreation system, or to another valuable facility, park, location, program, or endeavor. On such occasions, recognition of a donation by naming a new City facility, park, or location in honor of or at the request of the donor will be considered. c. As a guideline, the threshold for considering the naming of a park, recreational facility, or other City facility will include, but not be limited to the fact that land for the majority of a park was deeded by the donor; or the contribution by the donor of compromises a minimum of sixty percent (60%) of the capital construction costs associated with developing the facility, park, or location; or there is a solid commitment for a minimum twenty (20) year endowment by the donor for the continued maintenance and/or programming of the park or recreational facility, park, or other City facility or location. d. Donors who seek to name a facility after a particular individual are encouraged to follow the principles that apply to naming a City facility for an outstanding individual. See III.A.2 of this Policy. Possible exceptions to this will be considered on their own merits. The City reserves the right to rename any park or recreational or other City facility or location, if the person for whom it is named is or becomes disreputable. Corporate logos, insignias, brands, or direct advertising text shall not be used in City facility, park, or location naming text unless specifically authorized by the Council and under such terms as the Council unilaterally determines. NAMING OR RENAMING OF A CITY FACILITY PAGE 3 OF 6 IV. PROCEDURE A. General Principles In considering proposals for the naming or renaming of a City facility, park, or location the following will be taken into account prior to consideration by Council. 1. When naming a new recreational facility, park, or location, the proposed name must accomplish one (1) or more of the following: a. Engender a strong positive image. b. Be appropriate having regard to the facility’s location. c. Have historical, cultural, or social significance for future generations. d. Commemorate places, people, or events that are of continued importance to the City, County, region, state, or nation. e. Have symbolic value that transcends ordinary meaning or use or enhance the character and identity of the facility, park, or location. f. Have broad public support. g. Not result in the undue commercialization of the facility, park, or location, if it accompanies a corporate gift. B. Renaming a City facility, park, or location Names that have become widely accepted by the community will not be changed or discontinued unless there are compelling reasons and strong public sentiment for doing so. Historical or commonly used place names will be preserved wherever possible. C. Other Considerations To minimize confusion, no City facility, park, or location will be subdivided for the purpose of naming, unless there are readily identifiable physical divisions or distinct features (such as pathways, roads, or waterways, or physical features in or on structures) that help the public distinguish between facilities, parks, or locations. Naming of specific major recreational facilities within parks will be permitted; however, such names should be different from the park name to avoid confusion, unless otherwise specifically determined by Council. All signs that indicate the name of a City facility or location shall comply with City’s graphic and design standards and any applicable sections of the City Code. Specialized naming signage will not be permitted. All costs associated with purchasing and installation of the sign shall be the responsibility of the requestor. V. APPLICATION CONTENTS All naming and renaming requests will be made first to the Mayor’s office. Upon receipt by the Mayor’s office, requests for the naming or renaming of a City facility, park, or location for which NAMING OR RENAMING OF A CITY FACILITY PAGE 4 OF 6 the Parks and Recreation Department is or will be responsible shall be forwarded to the Director of Parks and Recreation for consideration by the City Parks and Recreation Commission. Naming and renaming requests should contain the following minimum information (no more than five (5) pages, typed): 1. The proposed name. 2. Specific reasons for the proposed name and how it adheres to at least one (1) of the three (3) categories (Historic Events, People/Group, and Places; Outstanding Individuals; and Major Donations). 3. Written documentation indicating broad-based community support for the proposed name (e.g. petition, newspaper articles). 4. Description/map showing location and boundaries of the City park or facility or location to be named. 5. If proposing to name a City facility or part of a facility within a park, include a description/map showing the location of the facility or part of a facility. 6. If proposing to rename a City facility or part thereof, include justification for changing an established name. 7. If proposing to name a City facility, park, or location or part thereof after an outstanding person, include documentation of that person’s significance and good reputation, as recognized by the City, county, state, or nation. 8. Identify the source amount of funding available to offset costs of a renaming if applicable. This could include signage or tangible media reprinting costs. VI. PROCESSING THE APPLICATION Upon receipt of a naming request by the Mayor (or, subsequently, the Director if the City Parks and Recreation Department), the relevant neighborhood association(s) should be advised and invited to share their comments on the proposal. Local neighborhood associations, where known, will be notified of naming or renaming proposals. Each proposal will then be considered by the Parks and Recreation Commission (if the City facility, park, or location is within their care) or it will be considered by the City Department most likely to be charged with maintenances or control of the facility, park, or location. Upon referral, the Parks and Recreation Commission (or City Department Director) shall review the proposed request for its adherence to the purposes and policies of this Resolution; ensure that supporting information has been authenticated, particularly when an individual’s name is proposed; and take into consideration the comments of the relevant neighborhood association(s). The Parks and Recreation Commission, as needed, may convene a public meeting to gain additional information, prior to making a decision to refer the matter (with a recommendation) to the Council for a final decision. NAMING OR RENAMING OF A CITY FACILITY PAGE 5 OF 6 VII. APPROVAL The Council shall approve any naming or renaming of a City facility, park, or location (or part thereof) in a duly noticed public meeting. There shall be no appeal from a final decision of the Council regarding a request for naming or renaming. THIS RESOLUTION shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by the Council. ADOPTED and effective this ________ day of ___________, 2017. CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO Rebecca L. Noah Casper, Mayor ATTEST: Kathy Hampton, City Clerk NAMING OR RENAMING OF A CITY FACILITY PAGE 6 OF 6

Get email alerts for Idaho Falls

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting