City Council
Regular MeetingIdaho Falls, ID · September 19, 2022
Minutes
September 19, 2022 Council Work Session
The City Council of the City of Idaho Falls met in Council Work Session, Monday, September 19, 2022, in the Council
Chambers in the City Annex Building located at 680 Park Avenue in Idaho Falls at 3:00 p.m.
Call to Order and Roll Call
There were present:
Mayor Rebecca L. Noah Casper (departed at 5:00 p.m.)
Council President Michelle Ziel-Dingman
Councilor John Radford (departed at 5:00 p.m.)
Councilor Thomas Hally
Councilor Jim Freeman
Councilor Jim Francis
Councilor Lisa Burtenshaw
Also present:
Chris Fredericksen, Public Works Director
Brad Cramer, Community Development Services Director
Bryce Johnson, Police Chief
Randy Fife, City Attorney
Michael Kirkham, Assistant City Attorney
Kathy Hampton, City Clerk
Jasmine Marroquin, Deputy City Clerk
Mayor Casper called the meeting to order at 3:04 p.m. with the following items:
Acceptance and/or Receipt of Minutes:
It was moved by Councilor Francis, seconded by Councilor Radford, that council receive the recommendations from
the September 6, 2022, meeting of the Planning and Zoning (P&Z) Commission pursuant to the Local Land Use
Planning Act (LLUPA). The motion carried with the following vote: Aye – Councilors Francis, Dingman, Freeman,
Hally, Radford, Burtenshaw. Nay – none.
Calendars, Announcements, Reports, Updates, Questions, and Discussion:
Mayor Casper announced she will be on city travel for the remainder of the week. She briefly reviewed her itinerary
for this travel.
September 21, Idaho Falls Fiber (IFF) Open House; and BMPO (Bonneville Metropolitan Planning Organization)
Meeting
September 22, City Council Meeting
September 23, Annual Idaho Falls Regional Airport (IDA) BBQ
September 27, IDA Board Meeting
September 29, Idaho Falls Fire Department (IFFD) Fire Prevention Block Party
September 30, IFAD (Idaho Falls Auditorium District) Tour
Mayor Casper distributed calendar items for October; she introduced Jasmine Marroquin, Deputy City Clerk; she
announced the retirement of Ms. Hampton; she requested any councilmember revisions to the Council Meeting
agendas; and she indicated a future city/county meeting will be scheduled.
Liaison Reports and Councilmember Concerns:
1
September 19, 2022 Council Work Session
Council President Dingman had no items to report.
Councilor Hally stated he believes the goal of the 25th Street construction will be completed before the snow falls.
He recognized the presence of Brian Powell and Craig Cutler from the EIRSD (Eastern Idaho Regional Sewer District)
Board.
Councilor Radford stated a new road has opened in Tautphaus Park. He also stated he will share Policymakers
Council items at the upcoming Idaho Falls Power (IFP) Board Meeting, He noted the recent power rate change will
include an energy rate option.
Councilor Francis had no items to report.
Councilor Freeman stated Councilor Burtenshaw has been named as a co-chair/community member of the Civic
Center for the Performing Arts committee/foundation.
Councilor Burtenshaw stated Saturn to Broadway should be paved in early October and Channing Way to Crestwood
will be paved and/or overlaid on September 21.
Public Works/Follow-up Discussion: Councils’ Consideration of EIRSD’s Service Request:
Director Fredericksen reminded the council that this item was discussed at the September 6, 2022, City Council
Work Session, however, two councilmembers were absent at that time. He indicated he distributed the background
of the sewer service request from Mr. Powell with the council. He stated the EIRSD is looking to pursue 2M gallons
of permanent capacity at the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). He also stated the EIRSD would initially pursue
200,000 gallons of flow from the properties north of York Road into a new trunk line that would need to be built, in
addition to new homes, noting that an average of 120-200 permits are issued annually, which would equate to
approximately 16,000-20,000 gallons of flow increase. It is anticipated this flow would take some time prior to
getting to the maximum of 2M gallons per day. Mayor Casper indicated the EIRSD has requested an immediate
answer pending a board meeting. Councilor Hally stated, per estimates from Director Fredericksen, between now
and 2040 there will be significant upgrades to the WWTP. He believes the estimated cost, without inflation, is
approximately $40M, noting previous rates have not covered cost, upgrades, or spending. He indicated current
rates are approximately $30. He stated the difference in connection fees between the City of Ammon and Idaho
Falls is $4,415. Per Councilor Francis, Director Fredericksen stated Idaho Falls would own the trunk line. He
explained the historical fees for sewer connections. He also explained the loan for the WWTP, noting the costs
provided by Councilor Hally. Director Fredericksen stated the rate is to pay for services provided both currently and
long-term and any additional/increased flow would need to be discussed at the next rate update. Per Councilor
Radford, Director Fredericksen stated residents are buying into capacity although the city would need to be
reimbursed; and he explained the difference in the strengths of flow, stating future development flow would need
to be considered. Per Councilor Francis, Director Fredericksen does not believe the flow through the trunk line
would be an issue, however, the flow would need to be lifted to reach the WWTP. Per Councilor Burtenshaw,
Director Fredericksen explained the pre-treatment process. Per Councilor Radford, Director Fredericksen stated the
development and capacity issues are typically long-range. He believes the trunk line would need to be more than
two miles long, noting the water line would need to be extended and an arterial road network would also need to
be built. He also believes there are pros and cons to all of this. Per Councilor Hally, Director Fredericksen stated
total cost of a trunk line would be difficult to formulate. Per Councilor Radford, Director Cramer agrees the growth
would have pros and cons. He stated this area is on the perimeter of current growth and he questioned whether
the impact fees would keep up with the growth. Per Councilor Hally, Director Cramer believes this is a difficult issue.
He also believes the focus has been setting a precedent for extending services outside city limits. Per Council
President Dingman, Mr. Fife stated legal has tried to work through some concerns regarding annexations and
agreements, noting these have been difficult. He emphasized revenue is not profit, he questioned the district’s
boundaries, and he questioned the enforcement of a contract upon capacity. He noted this would be contractual,
not government based. Mayor Casper reiterated the service would be permanent, not temporary. Councilor
Freeman expressed his concern for protecting the capacity. He stated he has no interest in subsidizing individuals
who do not live in the city, and this may encourage growth that may not be infill. He doesn’t believe this is a good
2
September 19, 2022 Council Work Session
idea. Director Fredericksen stated the costs of a trunk line would not be captured to the EIRSD. He also stated trunk
line costs will increase over time. Councilor Burtenshaw stated she is willing to have a conversation if the city has a
real benefit and would have real impacts. She recognizes the current growth along 65th S. Director Fredericksen
could not guarantee this would be a benefit to the city. Councilor Hally believes this is a horrible decision. Per Mayor
Casper, Director Fredericksen believes this could potentially be a recharge source. Per Councilor Francis, Director
Cramer believes the trunk line would encourage growth along 65th South and west of Hitt Road, which would affect
the Area of Impact (AOI), the type of annexation agreements, and the impact fees which he believes are important.
Discussion followed regarding annexation, connecting to city services, and the AOI. It was then moved by Councilor
Hally, seconded by Councilor Freeman, to not extend the asset to unknown areas of cost and ask the citizens of
Idaho Falls to gamble with their money, and include a directive to staff to cease/not entertain the offer. Director
Fredericksen stated the 2M would never come into the city, and the trunk line would be controlled by the city. Per
Councilor Burtenshaw, Director Fredericksen believes the fee structure could be addressed. Additional comments
followed regarding a contract, ‘wasting’ staff’s time, and the timeframe of the EIRSD request. Roll call on the motion
as follows: Aye – Councilors Freeman, Francis, Dingman, Hally. Nay – Councilors Radford, Burtenshaw. Motion
carried.
Mayor’s Office/Discussion: Spending Authority Resolution:
Mayor Casper stated the council adopted a resolution in 2020 regarding spending authority, noting supply chain,
labor issues, and inflation issues have increased costs. She indicated, due to these rising costs, additional purchases
are needing approvals. She explained the proposed resolution, as spearheaded by IFP Director Bear Prairie, noting
not every department has the same need. She also noted she removed Directors from the proposed resolution.
Councilor Hally stated he feels comfortable with this resolution. Councilor Radford believes Directors should be
added back in to the resolution. He noted these are budgeted items that have been given budgetary authority.
Comments followed regarding the Enterprise Funds Directors, the managerial role of the administration and the
elected officials, the budget system, purchase orders/change orders, and authorizing an additional designee (such
as the Controller). Mayor Casper indicated this topic has been discussed since 2015 to create efficiency. Councilor
Francis believes the departments should have the flexibility, although, he also believes the council should be
informed/made aware of this spending. Councilor Radford believes there should be more options for the directors
to lighten the Mayor’s Office. Councilor Burtenshaw believes the authority could be directed to the directors. She
also agrees the council should be informed/made aware. Additional comments followed including the complexity
of the city, boards versus councils, end of the year spending, and utilizing the Mayor’s Chief of Staff as a designee.
Mayor Casper stated she will present a revised resolution for council consideration.
City Attorney’s Office/Discussion: Quality of Life Ordinances:
Aggressive Solicitation Ordinance:
Council President Dingman stated this ordinance was created due to feedback received. Mr. Fife explained the
aggressive solicitation ordinance will protect citizens in certain spaces once an individual is not interested. He stated
this is not about passive requests for donations, this is about being followed harassed, threatened, blocked, or
intimidated. He also stated this does not apply to every area in the city, it applies mainly to an area where the public
doesn’t have a choice to leave, such as a bus stop, sidewalk café, entrance/exit to a school, or an ATM machine; it
does not apply to individuals in a parade, rally, or demonstration; and this does not interfere with someone’s ability
to connect to another person. Mr. Fife explained this ordinance is principally based on a similar situation in Austin,
Texas which addressed the homelessness issue. Council President Dingman stated she’s had numerous complaints
that she believes this ordinance will address. She shared some examples. She believes this is a real need. She also
stated she has no concern with food/agricultural vendors. Councilor Francis believes B.2.f. would be awkward to
enforce. Chief Johnson believes other laws have a similar component. Mr. Kirkham explained an officer would have
to make a judgement call. Per Councilor Burtenshaw, Mr. Fife stated, per default of City Code, any violation would
be a misdemeanor. Brief comments followed, including State law prohibiting individuals from walking into the
roadways, and minor modifications to the proposed ordinance.
3
September 19, 2022 Council Work Session
Noise Ordinance:
Mr. Kirkham stated this proposed ordinance was previously discussed (at the March 7, 2022, City Council Work
Session), noting discussion has occurred with a sound expert. He explained the description of a plainly audible sound
that exceeds 65 decibels during daytime hours and 55 decibels during nighttime hours that are measured from the
source of the sound (or property) being emitted. He also explained three construction noise features – hours
restrictions depending on the time of year, emergency work by the city, and a permit that warrants special
condition/consideration. He stated the city would need to comply with the sound notices and construction projects,
noting loading noise activity was added in residential zones. He also noted the penalty was changed that the first
and second violation would be an infraction, and the third violation would be a misdemeanor. Per Councilor Hally,
Mr. Kirkham stated sections of the ordinance were adopted from other cities. Council President Dingman believes
staff needs to review this ordinance. She also believes there have been disrespectful acts by some organizations,
although, she believes there needs to be a balance of reasonability. General discussion followed regarding the times
for summer and winter hours, construction noise permits for Public Works versus Community Development
Services, the distance of construction activities, notification by Parks and Recreation for special events, fireworks
violations, Public Works projects occurring at night, tolerating a vehicle radio versus a loud/uninstalled muffler,
elements of vehicle noise regulated by State Code, vehicles at the skate park, decibels, and an adequate training
period for the Idaho Falls Police Department.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:06 p.m.
s/Kathy Hampton s/Rebecca Casper ________
Kathy Hampton, City Clerk Rebecca L. Noah Casper, Mayor
4
Agenda
Honorable Mayor and Council
Brad Cramer, Community Development Services Director
September 7, 2022
September 6, 2022, Planning Commission Action
Planning Commission took the following action during the September 6, 2022, meeting.
1. ANNX22-016: ANNEXATION/INITIAL ZONING. Annexation and Initial Zoning of LC,
Limited Commercial for approximately 8 acres in Section 23, Township 2 North, Range 37
East. Generally located North of W 17th S, east of Grizzly Ave, south of Pancheri Dr., west of S
Skyline Dr. On September 6, 2022, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously voted to
recommend approval of the annexation with the initial zoning of LC to the Mayor and City Council
as presented.
2. ANNX22-013: ANNEXATION/INITIAL ZONING. Annexation and Initial Zoning of LC,
Limited Commercial for approximately 15 Acres in Section 7, Township 2 North, Range 38
East. Generally located north of US Hwy 20, east of N Boulevard, south of E 33rd N, west of N
Holmes Ave. On September 6, 2022, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously voted to
recommend approval of the annexation with the initial zoning of LC to the Mayor and City Council
as presented.
3. ANNX22-012: ANNEXATION/INITIAL ZONING. Annexation and initial zoning of R1, Single
Dwelling Residential for approximately 51 acres in the South 1/2 of Section 10, Township 2
North, Range 37 East. Generally located north of W 17th N, east of N 35th W, south of W 33rd
N, west of Bramble Ln. On September 6, 2022, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to
recommend approval of the annexation with the zoning of R1 for 30 acres along 17th Street and the
west portion of the property; and RP for the remainder of the property to act as a buffer between the
existing county development to the east, to the Mayor and City Council with a vote of 5 to 1.
4. ANNX22-015: ANNEXATION/INITIAL ZONING. Annexation and Initial Zoning of TN,
Traditional Neighborhood and R3, Multiple Dwelling Residential for approximately 61 acres
in Section 7, Township 2 North, Range 38 East. Generally located north of US Hwy 20, east of
N 5th W, south of W 33rd N, west of N Boulevard. On September 6, 2022, the Planning and
Zoning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the annexation with the initial
zoning of TN to the Mayor and City Council as presented.
5. PLAT22-028: PRELIMINARY PLAT for Innovation Point. Located North of US Hwy 20, east
of N 5th W, south of W 33rd N, west of N Boulevard. Generally located north of US Hwy 20,
east of N 5th W, south of W 33rd N, west of N Boulevard. On September 6, 2022, the Planning
and Zoning Commission unanimously voted to approve the preliminary plat as presented.
6. PLAT22-023: FINAL PLAT for Roderick Business Park. Located north of E Anderson St, east
of N Boulevard, south of Technology Dr, west of Boge Ave. Generally located north of E
Anderson St, east of N Boulevard, south of Technology Dr, west of Boge Ave. On September 6,
2022, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to recommend approval of the final plat to the
Mayor and City Council with a vote of 5 to 1.
7. PLAT22-026: FINAL PLAT for Cassiopeia Parks Subdivision. Located north of Lola St, east
of Grace Ave, south of Cassiopeia St, west of N Saturn Ave. Generally located north of Lola St,
east of Grace Ave, south of Cassiopeia St, west of N Saturn Ave. On September 6, 2022, the
Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the final plat to the
Mayor and City Council as presented.
8. PLAT22-027: FINAL PLAT for Valo at Bellin. Located north of Pancheri Dr, east of Boxwood
Dr, south of Bellin Cir, west of S Bellin Rd. Generally located north of Pancheri Dr, east of
Boxwood Dr, south of Bellin Cir, west of S Bellin Rd. On September 6, 2022, the Planning and
Zoning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the final plat to the Mayor and
City Council as presented.
9. PLAT22-029: FINAL PLAT for Black Feather Apartments. Located north of W Anderson St,
east of US Hwy 20, south of Science Center Dr, west of N Boulevard. Generally located north
of W Anderson St, east of US Hwy 20, south of Science Center Dr, west of N Boulevard. On
September 6, 2022, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously voted to recommend
approval of the final plat to the Mayor and City Council as presented.
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: To receive recommendation(s) from the Planning and Zoning
Commission pursuant to the Local Land Use Planning Act (LLUPA).
Idaho Falls Downtown Development Board Meeting held August 2, 2022, at 9:00am in the Arts Council
conference room. Those in attendance: Kevin Cutler, Cindy Napier, Jill Hansen, Tasha Taylor, Chip
Langerak, Brandi Newton, Kasi Nelson, Antonio Mesa, Kevin Josephson, Lisa Farris, Councilman Jim
Francis, Brad Crammer, Katelyn Long. Staff – Catherine Smith, Juan Hernandez, and Mala Lyon
Minutes of the July 12, 2022, meeting reviewed; Chip motioned to accept, Cindy seconded; Board
approved.
Financial report – Brandi – biggest expense is the watering of the flowers; We have a single contract
with Dave Lawrence this year instead of teenagers and Dave Lawrence so we are hoping the final costs
will be lower – but the costs are treading up with everything rising. We are watering the flowers with a
contract of $20,000 with the city that IFDDC manage it all. The city budgeted $85,000 for the same work.
We need to coordinate with the city to be hired at a cost closer to what it costs to do the work. We did
cut back our expenses by not doing spring flowers on Broadway. The goal is to have all the pots and
baskets set up on an auto watering system at Shoup and A Street. Councilman Jim Francis said we
should bring this to the city council and show that we are doing our part and subsidizing the costs.
Brandi motioned to accept; Tasha seconded; Board approved.
Directors Report – Catherine – We have ordered and will install two ‘Little Art Galleries’ which are
similar to the mini free libraries but instead of books you can borrow there will be small pieces of art
that people can take and enjoy. One will be placed by the Art Museum and one by the Museum of
Idaho. It will have its own social media page and local artists will be encouraged to participate.
Six of The Dogs of Downtown statues have been ordered – we are waiting on shipping. Artist will pick
them up to decorate and Idaho Steel will attach the bases. They will be moved inside during the winter
months and stored at the Art Museum. A new mural to highlight people’s pets will be placed on the alley
wall of BlackRock. Each pet portrait will be 12” x 12” and people will have to pay $250 to have their
pet’s portrait painted on the wall. We will work with Snake River Animal Shelter. Of that $50 will go to
Snake River Animal Shelter, $150 to the artist and $50 to us to maintain the mural. There will be a 3-
year contract with the pet owner’s sponsor and then a new portrait will be installed. If this goes well,
we hope to expand it onto the Melaleuca wall to the west. Page Insurance also wants to have a mural
installed on their building in the same alley. They are wiling to pay to have it done and would just like
our support and input – Catherine has applied for a grant through Mountain View Charity to help
support the contribution from Page Insurance.
Events – We are working on setting up a meeting with the board of the Farmer’s Market and having a
hard time finding a time everyone can meet. They need some organizational support. We do not want
the Market to move away from the downtown as they are very successful there and it benefits our
downtown.
Shop the Sidewalk summer sales – June was very successful as it was the same day as SummerBrew, but
we had fewer participate in July. Got complaints that it didn’t boost sales. We are offering $100 in
Downtown Gift Certificates for people that come downtown that day and fill out a shopping postcard.
Some merchants choose not to participate. We will be doing Ladies Shopping Days in Sept.
Road Closures for Events – We have been given permission to hold Oktoberfest Sept 17th on Park
Avenue in the street if we have a security guard at the door of every bar to control the problem of drinks
going in and out of the bars and have a security vehicle at each end of the block with a security person in
the vehicle at all times. The police still want us to have bollards or something to block every entrance
into the events. Councilman Jim Francis said he had a meeting with the police Chief, and he agreed to
let us use the barricades they have but we would have to figure out how to move them and install them
and return them each time. Kevin C. said we all appreciate safety, but it needs to be feasible. He has
attended soccer tournaments with 1,000’s of people and there is no security required. Nothing is
failsafe and if they require a certain standard for security it needs to be for everyone not just certain
groups. Brandi said the goal is to keep working on what are the options. How can we make it work?
Help us find a way. Being able to have vehicles parked at the end of the blocks is a great step forward.
Chip pointed out that road closures are under the jurisdiction of the IFPD and a large group in a park
doesn’t fall under their immediate concerns. The removeable bollards could be used, but where do we
store them and who would be in charge of placing them out and removing them each time?
International Festival – INL has offered to sponsor this event, but they need an organization to give
them a scope and statement of the work and manage the money for the committee. IFDDC has the
interest and desire to do this. Hoping it will be a yearly event that people will look forward to.
We would also like to do a Winter Farmer’s Market every Saturday from our Shop Small Saturday to the
Saturday before Christmas on the greenbelt. We have found a ‘fake’ ice skating rink that can be rented
and placed in the Broadway Plaza. Brandi said the Museum of Idaho has nativities stored and would
love to display them. Chip said we can bring back the nostalgic feel with lots of lights along the river –
hire a contractor to put the lights up.
Brad Cramer – Report from City of Idaho Falls – housing is still a big concern – there are 1,000
apartments being built and 3,000 more being looked at
Catherine – we are still working on getting the lights across the street back up on Park Ave. Kevin met
with the Economic Director from Great Falls MT. He had done a tour of Boise, Twin Falls, Pocatello and
Idaho Falls. He said they are working on lighting in their alleys for safety and attractiveness. Chip said
he is looking at getting a light and cameras in the alley by his mural. More businesses are getting
security cameras. It was suggested that we find out who has cameras. If we know who has them, we
can look at having them strategically placed to get views everywhere. It is very expensive to link all the
cameras together and hire someone to monitor them. Catherine said Jayce Howell suggested we
investigate having a ‘clean & green team’ like Boise where this group does all the sidewalk snow
removal, security, parking where they let employees know where open parking is thru an app and help
move people from place to place. Not sure we can ask property owners to up their BID to cover those
costs. We looked into placing lights across Puggslane but were stopped by I F Power and sanitation. Jill
suggested that the lights be put on the sides of the buildings rather than strung across.
Jill said the Rib & Chop House for safety has the policy that they all leave together at night as a team.
The City Council is looking into requiring security at each bar as there has been more problems at them
lately.
Lisa Farris – CDBG Report – we have $59,000 for 2022 funding. Encourage people to apply for the
façade grants. Page Insurance is doing restoration work on the bricks. Willowtree has not applied for an
awning and sign as suggested by the Board with the denial of their façade grant.
Brandi motioned to move the budget review of the 2022-2023 budget to our next meeting; Antonio
seconded. It will be emailed out for review.
Meeting adjourned at 10:09am The next board meeting will be held September 13th, 2022 (one week
later than normal due to Labor Day)
Respectfully submitted - Jill Hansen, secretary and Mala Lyon
Mayor's Office - Spending
Authority Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-_____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, I D A H O , A
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, GRANTING TO
THE MAYOR AND THE MAYOR’S DESIGNEES, LIMITED AUTHORITY
TO EXECUTE CONTRACTS, LEASES, REAL PROPERTY PURCHASES,
AND CHANGE ORDERS WITHIN CERTAIN LIMITS IN ORDER TO
FURTHER CITY INTERESTS; AND PROVIDING THAT THIS RESOLUTION
BE EFFECTIVE UPON ITS PASSAGE, APPROVAL AND PUBLICATION
ACCORDING TO LAW.
WHEREAS, the City authorizes and approves the City budget annually; and
WHEREAS, the City budget includes funding for various City projects; and
WHEREAS, changes to budgeted and approved projects and purchases may become necessary
in order to deal with unanticipated circumstances and contingencies (including cost and labor
availability and fluctuations; supply chain disruptions; and unit price increases) and to otherwise
ensure that City projects continue to move forward on a timely basis; and
WHEREAS, timely execution of lease agreements may be necessary for City-owned or City
controlled properties with various individuals, corporations, or other entities for the benefit the
City; and
WHEREAS, timely acquisition of additional personal or real property by the City may be
required to complete various City projects or to further City interests; and
WHEREAS, timely execution of minor contracts may be required to provide services necessary
to accomplish certain aspirations of the City; and
WHEREAS, authorizing the Mayor and Mayor's designee(s) to enter into such contracts, leases,
project cost changes, and change orders, where budgeted and related to City projects or
initiatives or Council expectations, will promote efficiency and timeliness; and
WHEREAS, prior City Resolution 2020-26, addressed approval of minor contracts, lease
agreements, real property purchases and change orders; and
WHEREAS, Council deems it expedient to supersede Resolution 2020-26 with this Resolution for
simplicity and clarity, and in order to build flexibility into the current policy.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, AS FOLLOWS:
1. Changes, Purchase Orders, and Change Orders on Council Approved Budgeted Projects
a. The Council hereby grants to the Mayor and to the Mayor's designee(s)
authority on Council approved and budgeted projects to approve changes, purchase
RESOLTION – LIMITED AUTHORITY 4.11.22 Page 1 of 3
orders, or change orders not to exceed the following cumulative amounts:
i. For a project of two hundred and fi fty thousand dollars ($250,000) or less,
twenty-five percent (25%) of the original project contract estimate; and
ii. For a project between two hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($250,000)
and seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($750,000), twenty percent
(20%) of the original project contract estimate.
iii. For a project of more than seven hundred and fi fty thousand dollars
($750,000), fifteen percent (15%) of the original project contract estimate.
b. Any approved change, purchase order, or change order exceeding three hundred
thousand dollars ($300,000) shall be submitted to the City Council for ratification.
Unit quantity/volume changes within an approved project do not require disclosure to
Council other than in the Treasurer’s quarterly budget report.
c. In cases where, in the opinion of the Department Director responsible for the
project, failure to make changes to an approved and budgeted project is reasonably
likely to cause significant project delay or disruption ,the Mayor may approve
expenditures above the amount authorized in this Subsection 1 upon the following
conditions:
i. Such expenditure is in the minimum necessary amount to avoid significant
delay or disruption; and
ii. The expenditure is within the responsible Department’s total authorized
budget; and
iii. The expenditure is reported to the Council at the next Council meeting
following the Mayor’s approval for ratification, adjustment, or other Council
action.
2. Contracts, Leases, and Real Property Purchases
a. The Council hereby grants to the Mayor and to the Mayor's designee(s) authority
to negotiate and to execute budgeted:
i. lease agreements that do not exceed fifty thousand dollars ($75,000) per
year.
ii. real property purchase agreements where the purchase amount does not
exceed seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000).
iii. contracts, including purchase orders, that do not exceed one-hundred
thousand dollars ($100,000).
RESOLTION – LIMITED AUTHORITY 4.11.22 Page 2 of 3
b. Prior to execution, all contracts, leases, and real property purchases authorized
pursuant to this Resolution must be approved/recommended by the responsible
Department Director.
3. Nothing in this Resolution shall alter, enhance, or diminish the powers and duties
granted by Idaho Code to the Board of Trustees of the Idaho Falls Public Library.
4. This Resolution supersedes and replaces Resolution 2020-26.
This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by the Council.
ADOPTED and effective this ______ day of ________________, 2022.
ATTEST: CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO
_________________________ _________________________________
Kathy Hampton, City Clerk Rebecca L. Noah Casper, Ph.D., Mayor
(SEAL)
STATE OF IDAHO )
) ss:
County of Bonneville )
I, KATHY HAMPTON, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY:
That the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the
Resolution entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS,
IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO,
GRANTING TO THE MAYOR AND THE MAYOR’S DESIGNEES LIMITED
AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE CONTRACTS, LEASES, REAL PROPERTY
PURCHASES, AND CHANGE ORDERS WITHIN CERTAIN LIMITS IN
ORDER TO FURTHER CITY INTERESTS; AND PROVIDING THAT THIS
RESOLUTION BE EFFECTIVE UPON ITS PASSAGE, APPROVAL AND
PUBLICATION ACCORDING TO LAW.”
_______________________________
(SEAL) Kathy Hampton, City Clerk
RESOLTION – LIMITED AUTHORITY 4.11.22 Page 3 of 3
Attorney's Office - Quality of Life
Ordinances
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; AMENDING TITLE 5, CHAPTER 4, BY
THE ADDITION OF SECTION 9 TO PROHIBIT AGGRESSIVE SOLICITATION;
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY,
AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, aggressive personal confrontations in public areas are disturbing and disruptive to
residents, visitors, and businesses and contribute to the loss of access to and enjoyment of public
places and to a sense of fear, intimidation and disorder; and
WHEREAS, aggressive confrontation includes people who approach or follow pedestrians;
repetitive attempts to confront another person despite refusals; the use of abusive or profane
language with the intent to cause fear and intimidation; unwanted physical contact; and/or the
intentional blocking of pedestrian and vehicular traffic; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance is intended to protect citizens from the fear and intimidation
accompanying certain kinds of aggressive confrontations, while not limiting a constitutionally
protected activity; and
WHEREAS, the presence of individuals who solicit money, jobs, or donations from persons at or
near bus stops, banks, automated teller machines, public transportation facilities, crosswalks, etc.,
is especially troublesome because of the enhanced fear of crime in a place that is confined, difficult
to avoid, or where a person might find it necessary to wait; and
WHEREAS, the Council finds that the City has a particular interest in encouraging and preserving
a vital, pedestrian-friendly urban core; promoting tourism and business in the City; preserving the
quality of urban life; and encouraging businesses and neighborhoods where walking is a realistic
alternative to vehicles that use fossil fuels; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, THAT:
SECTION 1: Title 5, Chapter 4, Section 9 of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, is
hereby added as follows:
5-4-9:
A. PURPOSE. This Section is intended to protect individual members of the public from the
fear and intimidation resulting from certain kinds of unwanted solicitation and is not intended to
limit any Constitutionally protected activity.
ORDINANCE – PANHANDLING 8.22.22 Page 1 of 5
B. DEFINITIONS. Whenever the following words or terms are used in this Section, they shall
have the meanings ascribed below:
AGGRESSIVE MANNER: Causing a person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of
a criminal act upon property in the person's possession by:
1. making any physical contact with or touching another person in the course of the
confrontation without the other person's consent when the person knows or should
reasonably believe that the other person will regard the contact as offensive or provocative;
2. following the person being confronted, if that conduct is:
a. intended to cause a person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of a
criminal act upon property in the person's possession; or
b. intended to intimidate the person being confronted into engaging in acts or behaviors
the person would not otherwise do or perform; or
c. continuing to confront a person within five feet (5’) of the person being confronted
after the person has communicated that the confrontation should cease; or
d. blocking the safe or free passage of the person being confronted or requiring the
person, or the driver of a vehicle, to take evasive action to avoid physical contact with
the person initiating or continuing the confrontation; or
e. using obscene or abusive language or gestures toward the person being confronted in
a manner that tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace; or
f. is intended to or is likely to cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm
or the commission of a criminal act upon property in the person's possession; or is
intended to or is reasonably likely to intimidate the person being confronted into
responding affirmatively to the solicitation.
AUTOMATED TELLER FACILITY: The area comprised of one or more automatic teller
machines and any adjacent space that is made available to banking customers for automated
banking.
AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE: A device, linked to a bank's account records, which is able
to carry out banking transactions.
BANK: A bank, savings bank, savings and loan association, credit union, trust company, or
similar financial institution.
BUS: A vehicle operated by a transit authority for public transportation, such as Greater Idaho
Falls Transit (GIFT).
ORDINANCE – PANHANDLING 8.22.22 Page 2 of 5
CHECK CASHING BUSINESS: The business of cashing checks, drafts, or money orders for
consideration.
CONFRONT: To approach or threaten or intimidate another person by words or actions in a
manner reasonably calculated to detain, hinder, or delay the person.
PUBLIC AREA: An outdoor area to which the public has access and includes, but is not limited
to, a sidewalk, street, highway, park, park amenity, parking lot, alleyway, pedestrian way, or the
common area of a school, hospital, apartment house, office building, transport facility, or shop.
SOLICIT: To request, by the spoken, written, or printed word, or by other means of
communication an immediate donation or transfer of money or another thing of value from another
person, regardless of the solicitor's purpose or intended use of the money or other thing of value,
and regardless of whether consideration is offered.
C. VIOLATION. A person commits an offense if the person solicits another person in an
aggressive manner:
1. in a public area;
2. on a highway within the City;
3. at a bus station or stop, or at a facility operated by transit authority for passengers;
4. within twenty-five feet (25’) of:
a. an automated teller facility;
b. the entrance or exit of a bank; or
c. the entrance or exit of a check cashing business;
5. at a marked crosswalk;
6. on either side of the street on a block where a school attended by minors or a child care
facility has an entrance or exit;
7. at a sidewalk cafe authorized or the patio area of a bar or restaurant.
D. EXEMPTIONS.
1. This Section is not intended to proscribe a demand for payment for services rendered or
goods delivered, or to regulate activities otherwise allowed by this Code.
2. This Section does not apply to a person who participates in or views a parade, festival,
performance, rally, demonstration, or similar event, or to a peace officer or other person
making a lawful detention or arrest.
ORDINANCE – PANHANDLING 8.22.22 Page 3 of 5
SECTION 2. Savings and Severability Clause. The provisions and parts of this Ordinance are
intended to be severable. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance should be
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,
clause, or phrase of this Ordinance.
SECTION 3. Codification Clause. The Clerk is instructed to immediately forward this
Ordinance to the codifier of the official municipal code for proper revision of the Code.
SECTION 4. Publication and Effective Date. This Ordinance, or a summary thereof in
compliance with Idaho Code, shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City, and
shall take effect immediately upon its passage, approval, and publication.
PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho,
this ______ day of ________________, 2022.
ATTEST: CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO
______________________________ ____________________________________
KATHY HAMPTON, CITY CLERK REBECCA L. NOAH CASPER, Ph.D., MAYOR
(SEAL)
ORDINANCE – PANHANDLING 8.22.22 Page 4 of 5
STATE OF IDAHO )
) ss:
County of Bonneville )
I, KATHY HAMPTON, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY:
That the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Ordinance entitled,
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; AMENDING TITLE 5, CHAPTER 4, BY
THE ADDITION OF SECTION 9 TO PROHIBIT AGGRESSIVE SOLICITATION;
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY,
AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.”
______________________________________
KATHY HAMPTON, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
ORDINANCE – PANHANDLING 8.22.22 Page 5 of 5
ORDINANCE NO. _________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; AMENDING TITLE 5, CHAPTER 4 BY
ADDING SECTION 9 PROHIBITING NUISANCE NOISES AND AMENDING CITY
CODE SECTION 8-7-1 TO REGULATE THE TIME, PLACE, AND MANNER OF
NOISE GENERATED BY A VARIETY OF ACTIVITIES; ESTABLISHING
PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION,
PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City is an attractive destination for both visitors and inhabitants; and
WHEREAS, part of what makes the City particularly attractive is the beauty, peace, and quiet of
its environs; and
WHEREAS, the Council wishes to encourage the peaceable enjoyment of the City, its amenities,
neighborhoods, and open spaces; and
WHEREAS, in order to facilitate the wide variety of activities within the City, while promoting
mutual respect, the City wishes to establish general noise regulations; and
WHEREAS, such regulations balance fairly the sometimes competing activities within City limits
and establish expectations regarding the amount and timing of noise expected by the community
during certain hours and within certain areas within City limits; and
WHEREAS, these regulations reflect community standards and are an exercise of health, safety,
and welfare police powers granted to the City by the Idaho Constitution, the Idaho Code, and the
City’s charter; and
WHEREAS, the Council hereby declares certain noise to be a general public nuisance as set out
in this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Council also amends the current construction hours to be consistent with the Code
language adding for nuisance noises.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, THAT:
SECTION 1. Title 5, Chapter 4, Section 9, of the City Code of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, is
hereby added as follows:
5-4-9 NUISANCE NOISE.
A. PURPOSE.
ORDINANCE – NOISE REGULATION 9.14.22 PAGE 1 OF 6
Plainly audible noise which due to its volume, its duration, or its location disturbs, injures
or endangers the comfort, repose, health, peace, or safety of persons who are not voluntary
listeners, is hereby declared to be excessive and harmful to the welfare of the occupants in
the City and; therefore, a public nuisance. Further, sounds coming from inside a vehicle
louder than necessary for the hearing of persons within the vehicle, are deemed excessive
and; therefore, a public nuisance.
B. DEFINITIONS.
Construction. Any site preparation, assembly, erection, repair, alteration, or similar action,
including demolition of buildings or structures.
Demolition. Any dismantling, destruction, or removal of buildings, structures, or
roadways.
Emergency Work and Public Works Activities. Any work or action necessary to deliver
essential public services including, but not limited to, constructing or repairing water, gas,
electricity, broadband fiber, telephone, sewer facilities, or transportation facilities,
removing fallen trees on public rights-of-way, sanitation, plowing snow, tree trimming and
removal, dredging navigational waterways, or abating life-threatening conditions.
Plainly Audible. Any sound that can be detected by a person using unaided hearing
faculties. For example, if a sound source is a portable or personal vehicular sound
amplification or reproduction device, the rhythmic bass component of the music is
sufficient to be considered plainly audible even if the title of music, words, or artist is not
distinct or identifiable. A sound that is measured at the ninetieth percentile sound pressure
level (LEQ 90) for a five (5) minute measurement period in excess of sixty-five decibels (65
dBA) during daylight hours or fifty-five decibels (55 dBa) during night-time hours
measured at a distance of fifty feet (50’) from the source that is emitting the sound shall
constitute a “Plainly Audible” sound per se. If the source of the sound is not readily
determinable, the property line along the parcel of real property from which the sound is
emitted shall be deemed as the source of the sound.
Vehicle. A conveyance that is propelled other than by human or animal power on land.
C. NOISE PROHIBITED.
No person shall make, continue, or cause to be made, or allow to be made on any premises
or any public place or public right-of-way in the City, from any radio, cd/dvd/mp3 player,
portable computer, smartphone, tablet, computer, tape player, television, musical
instrument, music streaming service, phonograph, sound amplifier, or similar sound
emitting devices, any excessive, loud, unnecessary, or unusual Plainly Audible noise.
Specifically prohibited is the playing, using, operating, or permitting to be played, used, or
operated, any device for playing, producing, or reproducing Plainly Audible sound at a
louder volume than is necessary for the hearing of persons who are voluntary listeners on
ORDINANCE – NOISE REGULATION 9.14.22 PAGE 2 OF 6
the premises or in the building, room, or chamber in which the sound is being played,
produced, or reproduced.
D. EXCESSIVE VEHICULAR NOISE PROHIBITED.
No person shall use, operate, or permit to be used, played, attached, installed, or operated,
radios, cd/dvd/mp3 players, portable computer, smartphones, tablets, computers, tape
players, phonography, vehicle stereo systems, televisions, glasspack mufflers, loud
tailpipes, and similar amplified or unamplified sound emitting devices, modifications, or
apparatuses in or on a motor vehicle loudly enough to disturb the peace, quiet or comfort
of persons who are involuntarily subjected to the Plainly Audible sound other than persons
on the same premises, or within ten feet (10’) of the vehicle from which the sound is
emitted; provided; however, that emergency vehicles and persons engaged in lawful
parades including sirens, exhaust, music, loud speakers, and associated noises shall be
exempt from the provisions of this Subsection for the duration of the activity.
E. QUIET HOURS.
No person shall shoot off fireworks or allow fireworks to be shot off or engage in or allow
prolonged shouting, yelling, hooting, whistling, singing, or playing of musical instruments
loud enough to disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of persons who are involuntarily
subjected to such noise between the hours of eleven o’clock (11:00 ) p.m. and six o’clock
(6:00 ) a.m. local time; provided, however, that persons engaged in school-related or sports-
related activities shall be exempt from the provisions of this Subsection for the duration of
the activity.
F. ANIMALS
No person shall permit any animal that they keep, own, or possess to create frequent or
habitual noises that are Plainly Audible. This prohibition applies to all private and public
facilities, including animal care clinics and animal care facilities, as defined by this Code.
G. CONSTRUCTION NOISE.
1. Construction Noise Hours Restriction. No person shall engage in construction,
repair, or demolition of buildings, streets, poles, etc., including site excavation and
grading between the hours of
a. Eleven o’clock (11:00 ) p.m. and six o’clock (6:00) a.m. local time from
May 1 to October 31
b. Nine o’clock (9:00 ) p.m. and seven o’clock (7:00) a.m. local time from
November 1 to April 30
2. Exceptions. The following activities are exempt from this section:
a. Emergency Work and Public Works Activities, as defined in this Chapter,
or
ORDINANCE – NOISE REGULATION 9.14.22 PAGE 3 OF 6
b. in the case of an urgent necessity in the interest of public health and safety
and with the permission of the Director of the Public Works Department;
or
c. pursuant to the terms of a construction noise permit issued by the Director
of the Public Works Department.
3. Construction Noise Permit. The Director of the Public Works Department may
issue a permit to any applicant that shall exempt the party from the construction
noise time restrictions on the following basis:
a. That the applicant demonstrates an unavoidable loss or substantial
inconvenience that warrants special consideration, including but not limited
to time constraints associated with concrete pouring, asphalt application,
roofing, weather and heat conditions that require reasonable
accommodation due to the practical needs of the construction work, or
health and safety concerns; and
b. That the applicant’s need for exemption from the construction noise hour
restrictions under this Chapter will not exceed fourteen (14) consecutive
days; and
c. The applicant provides a written plan detailing the reasonable and
responsible steps the applicant will take to keep plainly audible construction
noise at the lowest practical level during the construction noise hour
restrictions applicable under this Chapter; and
d. The applicant provides notice of the construction activities no less than
seven (7) days prior to the commencement of the construction work to
property owners within three hundred feet (300’) of the construction site.
The notice shall include the written plan detailing steps taken to minimize
noise and the expected duration of the construction noise that will occur
outside of the hours permitted by this section.
Any permit issued pursuant to this section shall expire fourteen (14) days from the
date that construction begins. An applicant who receives a permit may renew the
permit, provided that the Director of Public Works determines that the renewal is
necessary due to unforeseen circumstances, outside of the applicant’s control, to
prevent an unavoidable loss or substantial inconvenience.
H. LAWN AND WOODCUTTING NOISE.
No person shall engage in the use of chain saws and/or other woodcutting equipment, or
gasoline or electric powered lawn care equipment between the hours of nine o’clock (9:00)
p.m. to seven o’clock (7:00) a.m. local time in any residential zone.
I. LOADING NOISE
No person shall engage in loading, unloading, opening, or otherwise handling boxes, crates,
containers, garbage containers, or other objects between the hours of nine o’clock (9:00)
ORDINANCE – NOISE REGULATION 9.14.22 PAGE 4 OF 6
p.m. and seven o’clock (7:00) a.m. local time in such a manner that it produces Plainly
Audible noise in any residential zone.
J. EXCEPTIONS
1. The prohibitions in this Section shall not apply to the following:
a. A government agency or persons acting within the course and scope of such
government agency’s lawful functions, provided that construction projects
conducted for the City shall comply with the requirements for a
Construction Noise Permit, as set out in this Chapter.
b. The brief celebratory noisemaking at twelve o’clock (12:00) midnight local
time on New Year’s Eve.
c. Celebratory lighting of fireworks on the third, fourth, and fifth of July
between eight o’clock (8:00) p.m. and midnight local time.
d. During an event permitted by the Director of Parks and Recreation [notice
requirements?].
e. Activities and events authorized by an educational institution regulated by
the Idaho State Board of Education.
f. Operation of trains and airplanes.
K. PENALTY:
A person who violates any provision of this Section shall be deemed guilty of an infraction
and upon conviction thereof, shall be punishable by a fine set from time to time by
resolution of the Council. Provided, any person who has been found guilty of two (2)
violations of this Section within the period of one (1) calendar year shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor.
SECTION 2. Savings and Severability Clause. The provisions and parts of this Ordinance are
intended to be severable. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance should be
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,
clause, or phrase of this Ordinance.
SECTION 3. Codification Clause. The Clerk is instructed to immediately forward this Ordinance
to the codifier of the official municipal code for proper revision of the Code.
SECTION 4. Publication. This Ordinance, or a summary thereof in compliance with Idaho Code,
shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect immediately
upon its passage, approval, and publication.
ORDINANCE – NOISE REGULATION 9.14.22 PAGE 5 OF 6
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval, and publication.
PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho,
this _____ day of _____________, 2022.
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO
____________________________________
REBECCA L. NOAH CASPER, Ph.D., MAYOR
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
KATHY HAMPTON, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
STATE OF IDAHO )
) ss:
County of Bonneville )
I, KATHY HAMPTON, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY:
That the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Ordinance entitled, “AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO; AMENDING TITLE 5, CHAPTER 4 BY
ADDING SECTION 9 PROHIBITING NUISANCE NOISES AND AMENDING CITY
CODE SECTION 8-7-1 TO REGULATE THE TIME, PLACE, AND MANNER OF
NOISE GENERATED BY A VARIETY OF ACTIVITIES; ESTABLISHING
PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION,
PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.”
_______________________________________
(SEAL) KATHY HAMPTON, CITY CLERK
ORDINANCE – NOISE REGULATION 9.14.22 PAGE 6 OF 6
Get email alerts for Idaho Falls
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.