City Council
Regular MeetingIdaho Falls, ID · November 10, 2022
Minutes
680 Park Avenue
City Council Meeting Idaho F alls, ID 83402
�
Minutes
FALLS
Thursday, November 10, 2022 7:30 PM City Council Chambers
1. Call to Order
Present: Mayor Rebecca L Noah Casper, Council President Michelle Ziel-Dingman, Councilor Radford,
Councilor Hally, Councilor Freeman, Councilor Francis; and Councilor Burtenshaw
Also present:
All available Department Directors
Randy Fife, City Attorney
Jasmine Marroquin, Deputy City Clerk
2. Pledge of Allegiance
Councilor Hally led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.
Mayor Casper directed some order changes to the agenda due to continued software glitches. Mayor
Casper added (D) Municipal Services and renumbered the items following Municipal Services.
3. Public Comment
Donna Howard from Idaho F alls. Howard has concerns regarding the duties of the Idaho F alls Police
Department. Howard acknowledges that this concern has been addressed previously. Howard stated
that there have been incidents of tagging and graffiti throughout the City, and they have caught on
video the car license plate and the people coming out of the house and all this information was given to
the police. Howard has requested as a business to have the perpetrators make restitution to the
business, and nothing has been done about it. Howard has had several people relate similar stories to
her with domestic violence, trespassing, vandalism, etc. that have gone unattended by the police
department. Howard stated that if they must endure these issues without law enforcement protection,
then why are they paying taxes for these services. Howard stated that if the police cannot keep them
safe, and they have to be more vigilant at policing themselves, then they should be compensated by not
having to pay the City for that service. Howard quoted Idaho Statute Title 50 Chapter 6 Section 5602.
"The Mayor is to preserve order and take care that the ordinances of the City are complied with."
Howard stated that they are writing tickets by the airport, and she is asking if this is how visitors to the
State should be greeted. Howard stated that the enforcement of the 2-hour parking downtown also
creates tickets, and it is inconvenient for employees to stop what they are doing and move their car
every two hours and that creates an unproductive work environment. Howard asked if the $28 million
police facility has payment due and payment can only be made from revenue generated by the police
department. Howard asked how the police department generates revenue. Howard submitted a public
record request for monthly spending report for the police department on October 21, 2022, and
Page 1 of 13
680 Park Avenue
City Council Meeting Idaho Falls, ID 8340:
�
FALLS Minutes
perhaps there are expenses being paid that make the police department unable to financially perform
their duties. Howard stated that according to the State of Idaho Attorney General, she is entitled to that
information, but it was not given to her within 3 business days with a possible extension of 10 days. She
made a phone call to the City Clerk today to get that request met. Howard suggested that the police
department has not yet earned their money for such a big expensive facility.
4. Consent Agenda
A. Idaho Falls Power
1) Idaho Falls Power Board Meeting Minutes
B. Municipal Services
1) Q-23-002 HVAC Updates at Water Division
2) IF-23-D Purchase Rear Loader for Public Works
3) License Applications
It was moved by president Ziel -Dingman, seconded by Councilor Francis to approve, accept, or receive
all items on the Consent Agenda according to the recommendations presented. The motion carried by
the following vote: Aye - Councilors Dingman, Radford, Francis, Burtenshaw, Hally, Freeman. Nay - None
5. Regular Agenda
A. Public Works
1) Professional Services Agreement for a Wastewater Facility Planning Study with Stantec
Consulting Services Inc. and Keller Associates Inc.
A Professional Services Agreement with Stantec and Keller to update the City's 2010 Wastewater Facility
Plan. Work will include documenting a series of technical evaluations and condition assessments,
developing a list of future improvements, prioritizing, and recommending allocations for capital
improvements, complete environmental studies and compile evaluations and information into a
comprehensive Facility Plan.
Public Works Director Chris Frederickson stated this is a redo of the planned document for Wastewater
Facility completed in 2010. The City went through a quality bid selection process as required by State
Statute and determined that this was the best consulting group submitted to complete the study.
Director Fredrickson stated that this document provides the overall guiding work for the facilities in
wastewater planning. He said all the technical work that goes into completing all the needed
improvements, forecasted out to 20 years, and they are to a point where they have completed capital
improvements for the last 10 years based on the study completed in 2010, and the work that is needed
Page 2 of 13
680 Park Avenue
City Council Meeting Idaho Falls, ID 8340:
�
Minutes
FALLS
is anticipated to cost just under $497,000 of which they have a $250,000 grant from the Idaho
Department of Environmental Quality. Director Fredrickson stated It will evaluate the existing nearly 10
billion gallons of flow for today and give a road map of what improvements need to be made to
accommodate those flows into the future, and the reason that changes somewhat in the wastewater
industry, is they always have new requirements that are brought through environmental issues
associated with new permitting. Director Fredrickson stated that at some point Idaho Falls will have a
new discharge permit that will likely have new constituents that will need to evaluate and plan for. He
said the ideas and possible changes that could happen are evaluated, and they also evaluate the overall
plant capacity of 17 million gallons, and there is a lot that goes into that evaluation. He said the strength
of flow is important, and not just the total volume that flows through the plant. Director Fredrickson
stated that the study will help evaluate some of the things as they come along with constituents that
they test for, and it will give them other items to keep on their mind as far as other improvements that
will be triggered, even though they aren't approaching the 17 million gallons of treatment per day.
Councilor Francis stated that he is trying to process the implications of the growth that the City is facing,
and how it affects the wastewater plant. Councilor Francis asked if this would be finished in 1 year.
Fredrickson stated that is the anticipated time frame.
It was moved by Councilor Hally, seconded by Councilor Burtenshaw to Approve the
Professional Services Agreement and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute the
necessary documents. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye- Radford, Freeman, Burtenshaw,
Francis, Dingman, Hally Nay- None
B. Idaho Falls Power
1) Amended Ordinance Title 8, Chapter 5, Section 7
General Manager Bear Prairie presented an amendment to Ordinance Title 8, Chapter 5, Section 7. GM
Prairie stated that this allows them the ability to remove services to businesses or residences after 18
months of no service being paid and being disconnected from services. GM Prairie stated that it allows
them, when they are rebuilding areas with services that are in the way of other upgrades and future line
expansions, it doesn't make sense to maintain and continue to work around a service of something that
doesn't have a customer, and it make sense to remove those. GM Prairie stated that it will give them
the ability to clean up and maintain their electric system.
Mayor Casper stated that the City Attorney is at a conference for training, and they have Assistant City
Attorney Michael Kirkham joining on Webex, and Mayor Casper asked Kirkham about the wording on
the motion being incomplete. Mr. Kirkham stated that it is incomplete if what you want to do is
suspend the rules of three separate readings, you could pass it, and then in the next two council
meetings present it again and vote three times, but if you'd like to suspend that rule, then you need to
add that language onto the motion. Mayor Casper read "suspend the rules requiring three complete
and separate readings, publishing by title, and reading it by summary". Mayor Casper allowed Councilor
Radford to determine which version of the motion he'd like to make. Councilor Burtenshaw stated that
it does have the old City Clerk Kathy Hampton's name listed, and Mayor Casper asked Mr. Kirkham if
Page 3 of 13
680 Park Avenue
City Council Meeting Idaho Falls, ID 8340:
�
Minutes
FALLS
that needed to be addressed. Mr. Kirkham stated whoever is doing the verification on that, can be
added, and a clean copy can be made, and if that is made very clear on the record that is fine, but it is
not an original part of the document, it is just a verification that the clerk saw it and recorded it in the
City records.
It was moved by Councilor Radford, seconded by Councilor Freeman to Approve amended City
Ordinance Title 8, Chapter 5, Section 7 and give authorization to the Mayor and City Clerk under a
suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings and ask that it be read by title
and published by summary. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye - Councilors Hally,
Burtenshaw, Dingman, Freeman, Francis, Radford. Nay. None.
At the request of Mayor Casper, the City Clerk read the ordinance by title only:
ORDINANCE NO. 3491
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF
IDAHO; AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION TITLE 8, CHAPTER 5, SECTION 7 TO REQUIRE CUSTOMER
PAYMENT FOR REESTABLISHMENT OF ELECTRIC SERVICES, IF ANY, TO THAT LOCATION, AND TO
AUTHORIZE REMOVAL OF UNUSED ELECTRIC FACILITIES AT THE DISCRETION OF IDAHO FALLS POWER;
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE
DATE.
C. Fire Department
1) Declaration of Sole Source Vendor and Purchase of MagneGrip 100% source capture exhaust
removal systems for fire stations 4 and 5.
Chief Dwayne Nelson is requesting a declaration for a sole source vendor for a purchase of an exhaust
system for Station 4 and 5. This exhaust system is compatible with the current exhaust systems, which
will allow them to have the systems compatible across multiple apparatuses, and not have to use
different parts for repairs. Chief Nelson stated that the current exhaust systems are out of repair and
out of life and cannot be repaired. Chief Nelson is requesting a declaration for a sole source vendor for
the purchase of MagneGrip 100% Exhaust Removal System.
Councilor Radford appreciates the effort, as this is critically important, and is important for the City.
Councilor Francis stated that there was something similar done in the Consent Agenda for the water
department ventilation system, he said these are things that protect our workers, and this protects the
firefighters. Councilor Freeman stated that they started filtering the exhaust in the station later, and it is
a big step forward. He said that there is equipment on the trucks and that needs to be compatible from
Station to Station.
It was moved by Councilor Freeman, seconded by Councilor Dingman to Declare Weidner Fire as the
only vendor reasonably available for source capture exhaust removal systems because the compatibility
of components and the replacement of parts for the exhaust removal system with the City's existing
exhaust removal systems are the paramount considerations for this purchase and authorize the sole
Page 4 of 13
680 Park Avenue
City Council Meeting Idaho Falls, ID 8340;
�
Minutes
FALLS
source purchase for the Fire Department from Weidner Fire purchasing proposals #12072021F4 in the
amount of $102,973.66 for the purchase of MagneGrip 100% source capture exhaust removal system
for fire stations 4 and 5. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye - Councilors Burtenshaw, Hally,
Radford, Dingman, Freeman, Francis. Nay. None.
D. Community Development Services
1) Legislative Hearing for Consideration of an Ordinance approving the Pancheri East Bank
Urban Renewal District
Mayor Casper opened the public hearing for consideration of an Ordinance approving the Pancheri East
Bank Urban Renewal District.
Community Development Services Director Brad Cramer appeared and presented the following:
Director Cramer stated this is the final step in the creation of a new urban renewal district. Director
Cramer stated that they have seen this before when they authorized the Idaho Falls Redevelopment
Agency to proceed with other steps, including the development of a plan that establishes the types of
projects that can be completed; establishes a time frame for the district; and, the Financial Feasibility
Report to make sure the anticipated revenues are sufficient to cover the anticipated project cost.
Director Cramer introduced Meghan Conrad, Esq., from Elam and Burke who is legal counsel for the
Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency, and Renee Magee who is a consultant that worked on both the
Eligibility Report and Financial Feasibility Report. Director Cramer stated that the incomplete wording of
the motion on the previous item made him realize that he also forgot to write in the three and complete
separate readings language and asked them to transfer that to the motion.
Meghan Conrad, Esq., Elam and Burke presented: Conrad gave a quick reminder that an Urban Renewal
Plan is not a contract, but rather a framework for an implementation of projects that are anticipated to
occur within a specific geographic area, for a specific period, by Statute is 20 years or less.
Slide 1 - Conrad showed the project area that is approximately 32 acres and a portion of it was originally
included in the Pancheri project area that was terminated in 2020. This portion for the new project area
was not developed in the first effort and the area that did develop is not included in within the
boundaries of the project area. Conrad stated that the area has been underdeveloped and vacant.
Conrad stated that the driver behind this project is the proposed 90 room hotel, and the goal would be
to have revenue allocation proceeds from that development be available to reimburse certain eligible
improvements. Conrad stated that they have also considered in the projections the potential for a small
restaurant site, or small retail and office building.
Slide 2 - Conrad showed the path the project will take and the opportunities to touch the public as they
work through the project. Conrad stated that Urban Renewal planning has two phases, with the first
phase being the eligibility phase where the area is reviewed for the presence of certain statutory
conditions, and that effort was completed in February, whereafter the planning effort moved forward.
Conrad stated that the Plan was reviewed by the Agency Board in August 2022 and thereafter the
Agency Board took action adopting the plan on September 15, 2022, and the recommended approval of
Page 5 of 13
680 Park Avenue
City Council Meeting Idaho Falls, ID 8340:
�
FALLS Minutes
the Plan has been transmitted to the City for the necessary steps and action under the Statute. Ms.
Conrad stated that Planning and Zoning took a look at the plan and found it in conformity with the
Comprehensive Plan of the City on October 4, 2022. The first notice of the public hearing was published
in the Post Register on October 7, 2022, and that is the date that the overlapping taxing districts
received a copy of the planning documents; the second publication thereafter occurred on October 21,
2022.
Slide 3 - Ms. Conrad reminded the Council that what is included in the Urban Renewal Plan is governed
by Statute. Idaho Code 50-2905 identifies information that a Plan must include with a level of
specificity. Ms. Conrad stated that the required elements are discussed in the Plan narrative and the
related attachments, and below each of the elements is a specific plan section where you can find the
topic specifically addressed. Ms. Conrad stated that the first element is the 10% levitation. They look at
the combined assessment roles of the existing revenue allocation areas and compare it to the total
taxable value of the City and combined that number cannot exceed 10% of the total assessed value of
the City, and after review of that analysis, addition this revenue allocation area, would still be well
within the 10%. Ms. Conrad stated that they listed the public works projects that are anticipated to be
funded with revenue allocation proceeds under the plan, and those are predominately identified in
attachment 5 with some additional information set forth in a narrative format in Section 301. Elements
3 and 4 are the Economic Feasibility Studies together with the specific list of the estimated project costs
and those are covered in attachment 5. Element 5 is the Fiscal Impact Statement, showing the impact of
the revenue allocation area on the overlapping taxing districts. Ms. Conrad stated that when they talk
about impact, they are meaning the deferral of the new development value that would appear on the
new construction role, which is delayed until the termination of the revenue allocation area, and this
area is small at 32 acres, and that is limited delay over a period of 20 years. Element 6 is the description
of the method of financing, and they address what projects are to be funded on a pay as you go basis or
if there is going to be a reimbursement with a public entity, or a developer or owner. Ms. Conrad stated
that this section does address the different methods throughout the life of the District as well as in
attachment 5. Ms. Conrad indicated that this plan is predominately configured to be funded through
reimbursement, meaning that the developer would advance funds for the improvements, which would
be reimbursed over the life of the District until the District terminates, or the improvements have been
fully funded. Element 7 requires a termination date, and the 20-year termination date, if adopted this
year, would be December 31, 2042, and the revenue allocation proceeds would flow to the Agency in
2043. Element 8 is the description or retention of assets, and if the Agency does acquire assets, it is
anticipated that they would flow to the City or another pertinent public entity, and there is an
opportunity for the Agency to retain assets post termination should there be revenues other than
revenue allocation proceeds to fund the maintenance.
Slide 4 - Ms. Conrad indicated that this highlights the 10% valuation limitation that was discussed, and
the combined revenue allocation base assessment role, represent .22% of the total taxable value of the
City.
Page 6 of 13
680 Park Avenue
City Council Meeting Idaho Falls, ID 8340:
�
Minutes
FALLS
Slide 5 - Renee Magee, 815 Nez Pearce Street, Moscow, Idaho. Ms. Magee was the Executive Director
for the Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency from 1997 - 2016. Ms. Magee reviewed the Economic
Feasibility Study for the Pancheri East Bank Project Area. Ms. Magee directed Council to page 205- 212
of the material available for tonight's meeting, and also found on the Council website pages. Ms. Magee
stated that the purpose of the Study is to determine if a hotel to be constructed on 4 acres will generate
sufficient revenues to finance the public improvements that are necessary to ensure the construction of
the hotel.
Slide 6 - Ms. Magee stated that the Financial Feasibility Study found that the hotel will generate
sufficient revenue to reimburse the developer $390,000 for environmental remediation, demolition, and
improvements to Riverwalk Drive. Ms. Magee stated that over the life of the project area it is
anticipated that $2.8 million will be generated, and that estimate is based on the 2021 tax levy rates.
Slide 7 - Ms. Magee stated that it is assumed that the developer will initially fund the assistance and be
repaid from the tax increment generated by the hotel. Ms. Magee stated that in addition to the
assistance for demolition and Riverwalk improvements, there may be a need for additional assistance
for right of way improvements and public utilities. Ms. Magee stated that there is not an internal street
system in this area, and there are no public utilities in this area, as everything is under private
ownership.
Slide 8 - Ms. Magee showed the anticipated projects for the area. Ms. Magee showed that the first
$350,000 in public improvements are anticipated to be completed by the developer in 2023 and 2024
and that will include the demolition and Riverwalk improvements. Later years of the project area it is
anticipated that there will be sufficient funding to do additional right of way improvements, and to
assist with public utilities, and possibly do a portion of an internal street system in the area.
Slide 9- Ms. Magee summarized that it is anticipated that approximately $2.8 million will be generated
through the construction of the hotel, and additional private investment.
Slide 10- Ms. Magee stated that this table is found on page 209 of the materials for Council. Magee
stated that the table assumes that the hotel is completed in 2025 and additionally a small retail building
and a restaurant are constructed in 2027 - 2030. The assessed valuation of the additional investments
would total less than $3 million. Ms. Magee stated that there is a major decrease in the total assessed
valuation between 2022 and 2023/2024, and that is to reflect the demolition of the King B
Manufacturing plant.
Slide 11- Ms. Magee showed the slide that explains the assumptions that went into the table and
estimated revenues. Ms. Magee stated that they do not believe that revenue will flow from the hotel
until 2027 because it is not anticipated to be completed until the end of 2025. The table shows a Mill
levy decrease of 1% annually and the value of new construction of the hotel and a small retail building
and restaurant will be increased by 2% annually, with a base assessment (value of the buildings that
presently exist) will increase by .5% a year based on what has historically happened in this area. Ms.
Magee stated that the base assessment will be reduced by the demolition of the former King B
manufacturing facility. Ms. Magee stated that the base value of the beginning of this project is
Page 7 of 13
680 Park Avenue
City Council Meeting Idaho Falls, ID 8340:
�
FALLS Minutes
estimated to be slightly below $6million. Ms. Magee stated that the value of the new hotel is estimated
to be $13.5 (less than estimated by the developer).
Slide 12 - Ms. Magee stated that this slide illustrates the cash flow, showing estimated revenues and
estimated expenses. Ms. Magee indicated that this table is found on page 209 of the materials for
Council. Ms. Magee stated that this table shows the developer should be reimbursed by 2030 the
$390,000. Ms. Magee stated that in addition, they should be able to repay a loan that has been received
from another District of $30,000 by the year 2028. Ms. Magee showed that they estimate to have $2
million for additional public projects in the area.
Slide 13 - Ms. Magee stated that the developer advanced $38,000 for the cost of creating the plan for
the project area. Ms. Magee stated that there is an inter-district loan of $30,000 anticipated and the
payment to the developer would be covered by an owner participation agreement with 75% of the tax
increment will be paid to the developer under the OPA and 15% is set aside to cover administrative
assistance in the last table (They might need the full 25% in the initial years). The developer should be
repaid $390,000 to cover $350,000 for demolition, public infrastructure, and $38,000 advance.
Slide 14 - Meghan Conrad, Esq., stated that this slide highlights the Planning Commissions' finding of
conformity with the Comprehensive Plan, the proposed development of the hotel and retail and the
potential office space falls within the mixed-use corridor and urban core planning areas, and the
Riverwalk improvements are also highlighted as part of the project.
Slide 15 - Ms. Conrad stated that this is a post July 1, 2016, plan so if approved there are limitations of
the ability to amend this plan in the future by City Council Ordinance. Ms. Conrad stated that should the
plan be amended by City Council Ordinance, it would trigger a reset of the base assessed value to the
current assessed value, eliminating the revenue stream in that project area. Ms. Conrad stated that
there are specific exceptions to a base reset, including an annexation of up to 10% of the acreage, de
annexation, ministerial/technical changes, and extension to a portion of the industrial area, that is
existing within the project area.
Slide 16 - Ms. Conrad stated that today is the time set for the public hearing and the City Council
consideration of the Ordinance. Ms. Conrad stated that if the ordinance is adopted, there is publication
of the ordinance summary, recording the ordinance, and transmittal of the documents to county and
State officials as well as the overlapping taxing districts. Ms. Conrad stated that to establish the area by
January 1, 2023, the deadline to do all these things is December 1, 2022.
Councilor Francis asked if the area is 32 acres, or 36 acres {32 acres+ 4 acres for hotel). Ms. Conrad
stated that a discrepancy occurred when adding up the survey maps and legal that occurred later in the
process. Ms. Conrad directed Council to attachment 2 to the Plan and the surveyed legal is closer to 32
acres. Ms. Conrad stated that references to 36 is an overstatement.
Mayor Casper asked about the $350,000 for demolition, remediation, and Riverwalk improvements, and
feels it is a small amount. Ms. Magee stated that the figures come from the developer, and she would
Page 8 of 13
680 Park Avenue
City Council Meeting Idaho Falls, ID 8340:
�
Minutes
FALLS
assume that remediation will be not overwhelming, however $250,000 to demolish the building is not a
minor sum.
Mayor Casper opened the hearing to the public for testimony.
No one appeared in support or opposition.
Councilor Francis asked if they need to make an amendment to reflect the references to 36 acres need
to be adjusted to 32 acres, although the actual Ordinance does say 32. Mayor stated that the ordinance
does govern it. Mayor Casper stated that is a procedural item.
Mayor Casper closed the public hearing.
Councilor Burtenshaw thanked Director Cramer and acknowledged that this takes a lot of time from his
department and thanked Magee and Ms. Conrad for their time and expertise. She left it up to Councilor
Francis to make an amendment if desired, or she will say that the documents should reflect the actual
area. Councilor Hally stated that he wanted to address the reason behind the 20-year limitation on the
area. He said you never know on construction what kind of development could come forth besides the
hotel, and construction takes time, a recession can slow things down, and so you can always finish the
project earlier and close the district, but you cannot add time to it. Councilor Hally stated that the
developer in this instance estimated the acreage to start with without a formal evaluation, and that is
why it went from 36 to 32 acres. He noted that there will be several plans that the District will engage
with the developer along the way, and things can change during that period of time. Councilor Hally
stated that you never know what could be found in the area, as far as basalt, and sometimes it takes
extensive amount of work or dynamite. He said this area was part of another District, and nothing
happened, and now we have a developer that wants to make something happen, and it is along the
Snake River, and a development that they should be happy about. He said that when the district closes,
the base will go back to the City and the base is permanent. Councilor Hally is in favor of the project.
Councilor Francis stated that there used to be several businesses operating in this area, but they have
gone away and now it sits as not vacant, but not being fully used, and when this develops this will
benefit the entire community because it will be developed with some public space. He said the
redevelopment will allow stimulation for the benefit of the entire community, not just this area. Francis
strongly supports this project.
Mayor Casper expressed her strong support for urban renewal, and noted for public that urban renewal
in the City of Idaho Falls is a success story, and for every District they have opened, they have increased
the value of the real estate in the District, and every time a District has closed, the citizens of Idaho Falls
have been better off because they have created property that has increased value, and grown the tax
base, and thereby lower taxes for residents across the community.
Councilor Francis asked Mr. Kirkham if they need to make the adjustment in the document even though
the ordinance is correct. Mr. Kirkham asked Francis what document he was referring to. Councilor
Francis indicated that the supporting document (study, supporting documents, exhibits). Mayor Casper
stated that Ms. Conrad indicated that in places where the number is different from 32 acres, it is
Page 9 of 13
680 Park Avenue
City Council Meeting Idaho Falls, ID 8340:
�
Minutes
FALLS
because early on the developer estimated the acreage, and the acreage wasn't established until later.
Dingman stated that the Ordinance refers to attachment 5, which is the Feasibility Study. Mayor Casper
stated that the Economic Feasibility Study does not have the acreage in it. Council President Dingman
feels it is ok. Councilor Francis stated that on page 207 it states 36 acres and that is part of the
Economic Study. Director Cramer stated that there are some references in the Economic Feasibility
Report that point to 36 acres, and it is not just an estimate, but when they initially create a boundary,
they use parcel maps that are provided from the County, but by the end of the exercise there was a
surveyed boundary. Director Cramer stated that at the time of the Eligibility Report, the Financial
Feasibility Report, they were going off parcel maps, and the acreage was correct. Director Cramer
showed that part of the 4 acres difference was as the lines slide up based on the survey they are
shrinking. It is in Director Cramer opinion that there is nothing inaccurate, as the Economic Feasibility
Study was based on 36 acres, and the Eligibility Report was based on 36 acres, the survey boundary line
corrected and did all sorts of research (tricky with easements, etc.) and it shrunk the official size down to
32. Director Cramer doesn't feel there is anything inaccurate, but the boundary did change between the
different reports. Councilor Francis stated that his comment had nothing to do with the accuracy or
inaccuracy, but rather when they pass the document, they want it to be legal, so they don't have to
come back. Mr. Kirkham stated that he is looking at the ordinance and Exhibit 2 which is the notice that
was published, and it reflects a parcel of approximately 31.5 acres, and that is correct, so the studies
were based on estimated boundaries, and the notice part, and the official legal description will be
applied, and the fact that the boundaries weren't exactly what everyone thought at the planning stage,
isn't going to change what the development zone will be. Mr. Kirkham doesn't feel that they need to
amend or correct the feasibility studies, because the legal description will apply to the redevelopment
area and the ordinance itself.
It was moved by Council Burtenshaw, seconded by Councilor Francis Approve the Ordinance approving
the Pancheri East Bank Urban Renewal District under suspension of the rules requiring three complete
and separate readings and request it be read by title and published by summary and give authorization
for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents. The motion carried by the following
vote: Aye - Councilors Dingman, Burtenshaw, Francis, Freeman, Hally, Radford. Nay- None
At the request of Mayor Casper, the City Clerk read the ordinance by title only:
ORDINANCE NO. 3492
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, APPROVING THE URBAN
RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE PANCHERI EAST BANK URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT, WHICH PLAN INCLUDES
REVENUE ALLOCATION FINANCING PROVISIONS; AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT A COPY
OF THIS ORDINANCE AND OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION TO COUNTY AND STATE OFFICIALS AND THE
AFFECTED TAXING ENTITIES; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION, AND PUBLICATION BY
SUMMARY; PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Page 10 of 13
680 Park Avenue
City Council Meeting Idaho Falls, ID 8340:
�
Minutes
FALLS
2) Legislative Public Hearing-Part 1 of 2 of the Annexation and Initial Zoning-Annexation
Ordinance and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for 10.649 acres for the
Southeast¼ of Section 23, Township 2 North, Range 37 East.
3) Legislative Public Hearing-Part 2 of 2 of the Annexation and Initial Zoning of LC, Limited
Commercial with Controlled Development Airport Overlay Zones, Initial Zoning Ordinance and
Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, 10.649 acres of the SE¼ of Section 23,
Township 2 North, Range 37 East.
Mayor Casper opened the public hearing for Annexation and Initial Zoning of LC for 10.649 Acres.
Applicant: Matthew Bird, 4980 Riverbend Lane, Idaho Falls. Bird thanked City staff for their help with
the application process. Bird stated that they have received recommendation of approval from Planning
and Zoning for annexation with initial zoning of LC for approximately 10.649 acres off Skyline Drive. Mr.
Bird showed on the map east of Skyline Highschool is the proposed property. Bird stated that the
property just to the north (in red) has already been approved LC; Camping World is adjacent to this
property. Bird stated that this zoning would follow the Imagine IF Comprehensive Plan.
Councilor Freeman asked if the parcel to the north in red is related to this parcel. Mr. Bird stated that
they are not related, but just requesting the same designation.
Director Brad Cramer appeared and presented the following staff report:
Slide 1-Zoning Map. Director Cramer stated that besides the LC to the North, there is HC zoning in the
area, as well as Rl with Skyline Highschool. Director Cramer stated that further east you see some of the
Rl as well, and that area is back and forth between County and City, and that reflects which properties
have City utilities and were annexed by the City.
Slide 2-Comprehensive Plan. Director Cramer stated that the future land use map shows this area as
mixed-use centers and corridors, where it is along 115, and Skyline is a minor arterial where you'd expect
to find LC types of development. Cramer stated that it is consistent with the principles of the
Comprehensive Plan
Slide 3- Aerial outline of where the parcel is located. Director Cramer showed where the parcel is
located. Slide 4-Aerial. Director Cramer showed that the property is currently undeveloped.
Director Cramer stated that P&Z recommended approval and staff concurs.
Councilor Francis asked if they are annexing the whole road of Skyline along with this piece. Director
Cramer agreed that they are annexing the whole road. Councilor Francis asked if all South Skyline will
now be developed with City standards. Director Cramer agreed.
No one appeared in support or opposition.
Mayor Casper closed the public hearing.
Page 11 of 13
680 Park Avenue
City Council Meeting Idaho Falls, ID 8340:
�
FALLS Minutes
Councilor Burtenshaw feels that everything is sufficient in the packet and pointed out that there is not a
connection to Stosich Lane, and the access will be from 17 th South and Skyline.
Mayor Casper added that it is a Category A Annexation.
It was moved by Council Burtenshaw, seconded by Councilor Francis to Approve the Ordinance annexing
10.649 acres for the Southeast¼ of Section 23, Township 2 North, Range 37 East under a suspension of
the rules requiring three complete and separate readings and request that it be read by title and
published by summary. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye - Councilors Francis, Dingman,
Freeman, Hally, Radford, Burtenshaw. Nay- None
It was moved by Council Burtenshaw, seconded by Councilor Francis to Approve the Reasoned
Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the annexation of 10.649 acres for the Southeast¼ of
Section 23, Township 2 North, Range 37 East and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the
necessary documents. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye- Councilors Burtenshaw, Hally,
Dingman, Radford, Freeman, Francis. Nay- None
At the request of Mayor Casper, the City Clerk read the ordinance by title only:
ORDINANCE NO. 3493
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF
IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 10.649 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A
OF THIS ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY WITH THE APPROPRIATE
COUNTY AND STATE AUTHORITIES; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND
ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE.
It was moved by Council Burtenshaw, seconded by Councilor Francis to Assign a Comprehensive Plan
Designation of "Mixed Use Centers and Corridors" and approve the Ordinance establishing the initial
zoning for LC, Limited Commercial with Controlled Development Airport Overlay Zones as shown in the
Ordinance exhibits under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings and
request that it be read by title and published by summary, that the City limits documents be amended to
include the area annexed herewith, and that the City Planner be instructed to reflect said annexation,
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, and initial zoning on the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps
located in the Planning office. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye - Councilors Hally, Francis,
Radford, Dingman, Burtenshaw, Freeman. Nay- None
At the request of Mayor Casper, the City Clerk read the ordinance by title only:
ORDINANCE NO. 3494
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF
IDAHO; PROVIDING FOR THE INITIAL ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 10.649 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT
A OF THIS ORDINANCE AS LC, LIMITED COMMERCIAL AND CONTROLLED DEVELOPMENT AIRPORT
Page 12 of 13
680 Park Avenue
City Council Meeting Idaho Falls, ID 8340:
�
Minutes
FALLS
OVERLAY ZONES; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY, AND ESTABLISHING
EFFECTIVE DATE.
It was moved by Council Burtenshaw, seconded by Councilor Francis to Approve the Reasoned
Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for the Initial Zoning of LC, Limited Commercial with
Controlled Development Airport Overlay Zones, and give authorization for the Mayor to execute the
necessary documents. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye- Councilors Freeman, Radford,
Burtenshaw, Francis, Dingman, Hally. Nay- None
6. Announcements
Mayor Casper announced that tomorrow is Veterans Day and invited everyone to reflect on the
Veterans and their service.
Mayor Casper stated that the next meeting will be on the 21 st will be work session from 3 - 6 pm and
Tuesday 22nd will be the City Council Meeting.
Mayor Casper stated that the City will not be open for business on Thursday or Friday during
Thanksgiving week.
7. Adjournment.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:45 PM
s/ Corrin Wilde s/Rebecca L. Noah Casper
Corrin Wilde, City Clerk Rebecca L. Noah Casper, Mayor
Page 13 of 13
Get email alerts for Idaho Falls
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.