Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency
Regular MeetingIdaho Falls, ID · July 15, 2021
Minutes
IDAHO FALLS REDEVELOPMENT AGENC Y
P.O. BOX 50220
IDAHO FALLS, ID 83405
July 15, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes Council Chambers
Call to Order: Lee Radford called the meeting to order at 12:00.
Members Present: Lee Radford, Chris Harvey, Thomas Halley, Brent Thompson, Kirk Larsen
Members Absent: Terri Gazdik.
Also Present: Brad Cramer; Ryan Armbruster Esq.; and interested citizens.
1. Modification to Agenda. Radford indicated that there is a need to change the Agenda to include
the approval of the 2022 Budget. Armbruster also asked that they add to the motion that the reason they
have to approve the Budget today is keep in time sequence with the required statutory notices and
publication because technically adding something on the Agenda at this late date under the new statute
would not allow you to take action. Armbruster added that the motion would be for “Tentative approval
of the budget”
Brent Thompson moved to add to the agenda an action item to tentatively approve the proposed FY
2022 Budget, as there was an oversight of the action item not getting on the agenda, and action
needs to be taken to today in order to comply with the statutory requirements, Thomas Haley
seconded the motion and it passed unanimously.
2. Approval of Minutes May 24. Kirk Larsen showed one small error on the minutes on Item #5.
Kirk Larsen moved to approve the Minutes for May 24, 2021 with the change requested, Brent
Thompson seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously.
3. Approval of Expenditures and Finance Report. Lee Radford presented the Finance Report
dated July 15, 2021. In the River Commons Fund: Rebecca Thompson $50.00 for transcription.
Thomas Halley moved to approve the Finance Report dated July 15, 2021, Kirk Larsen seconded
the motion. The Motion passed unanimously.
4. Approval of the Proposed Budget for FY 2021/2022 Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency.
Cramer pointed out a small error on the Notice of Public Hearing on the backside, that notes that the
Board of Directors will tentatively approve the budget on July 23, and that will be changed to the 15th.
Cramer directed attention to the Budget Worksheet and stated that the budgeting process is easier that in
years past because all that is happening at this point is writing OPA checks to developers. Cramer stated
that this budget is similar to last year budget with one change being the Jackson Hole Junction Revenue
Allocation Fund and those expected revenues are shown at an increase now that the hotel and medical
office are in place there is revenue starting to come in that District and they are also going to break
ground soon on an apartment complex, and they just received plans for 2 auto dealerships. Cramer
forecasts that the revenue will increase in the coming years. Cramer stated that Eagle Ridge is left where
it is, but they are now having discussions with the owners and developers in Eagle Ridge, and they are in
the process of rezoning property so they can start some projects there and that District will take off.
1
Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency July 15, 2021.
Cramer stated that River Commons is holding stead with two OPA payments to Ball Ventures and
Thomas Development. Cramer stated that the budget is straight forward.
Mark Hagedorn stated that there is nothing exciting just OPA payments.
Radford summed up that they will get money in for River Commons and most of that will be sent back
out to the developer pursuant to previous OPA payments; Eagle Ridge might get some money in that
could go back to the developer; Jackson Hole should start getting money in that will go out to the
developer. Radford stated that all Districts are moving forward. Radford stated that this proposed budget
will go out for public notice and published in the newspaper and the public will have a chance to review it
and comment at the hearing, and next month the budget can be approved so it is in place for the next
fiscal year.
Thompson asked in the River Commons showing $1 million and $1,409.00 million, so $2.5 million
dollars, and will that be covered by the revenue of $1,250,000 plus the fund balance carry over.
Hagedorn indicated that the budget is balanced based on cash and revenue, so the $1.3 million at the
bottom that says fund balance is the current cash balance (projected cash balance at end of year) and take
that to project revenue to get to the expenditure authority and gets the maximum amount of revenue cash
to get the maximum discretion they can get. Cramer added that it is a lesson learned from the Snake
River District as it got close to the end there was a lot of cash, but it wasn’t being budgeted at the
beginning of the year unless they knew what the project was, but as the District got close to the end, it
was hard to know how the money would be spent, so it was budgeted as available to budget everything
out and if a project comes up you don’t have to wait till the next year or re-open the budget to deal with
upcoming projects. Halley added that the Board was conservative on the agreements.
Thompson asked how to tell which District the funds are accumulated funds as it just states Fund Balance
Carry over. Hagedorn stated that each fund has its own bank account. Thompson stated that the budget
just states fund balance carry over. Hagedorn stated that each fund balance is represented by each separate
fund.
There was some confusion discussed on Fund Balance on the Public Hearing Notice. Thompson and
Hagedorn along with Cramer worked through the miscommunication.
Brent Thompson moved to approve the Notice of Public Hearing for the Proposed Budget for FY
2021/2022 with one revision made by Hagedorn, Thomas Halley seconded the motion and it passed
unanimously.
5. Update on Potential District Requests for Small Districts. Cramer stated that the last year he
has had people looking at projects in Idaho Falls, that are smaller in nature than previous Districts, but
given the state of Idaho Falls in development and the state of the Urban Renewal Statute in Idaho, they
are probably the most likely candidates for District that the Board will see. Cramer stated that they are
finding in Idaho Falls, that the easy sites are about all gone, and what is left is rock and difficult sites and
parcels. Cramer stated that he has invited a few people to come and introduce themselves and the sites
they are looking at the challenges of the sites. Cramer introduced Austin Fitzgerald and Ryan Weimer
(online). Cramer asked Austin Fitzgerald to show the sites they are looking at and the potential need they
would have for their project to get the Board familiar with what they are doing.
Austin Fitzgerald and Blake Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald stated that they have some property that they are
looking at in the City and they have gone through the planning and zoning portion and waiting on City
Council. Fitzgerald stated that they are not totally familiar with how it works, but this ground has a lot of
2
Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency July 15, 2021.
lava on the 48 acres with sections of lava. Fitzgerald stated that they are envisioning some light
commercial and industrial, with the possibility of multi-family.
Radford stated that this is what the Agency is trying to encourage and under the Urban Renewal Law the
Agency can try to help in areas of town that have been blocked or obstructed by natural features or poor
development in the past. Radford stated that the Agency has done a lot of rock removal to try to facilitate
that type of development for areas that would not otherwise develop. Radford stated that they try to direct
the help to areas that can be a help to the whole community and create more efficiencies and getting more
property on the property tax roll to benefit all the taxpayers.
Radford asked if they are looking at more of a residential development. Fitzgerald stated that half of the
property would be higher density residential and entry level housing, and the rest of the development
would be commercial leases to supplement the residential development. Fitzgerald asked if there are
zones that they prioritize over other zones for Districts. Radford stated that they the Agency tries to
maximize the return to the taxpayer. Thompson added that they leave it up to the developer to know what
is the most feasible areas and the Agency is to assist the developer to get the project going. Radford
stated that the Agency always asks what has impeded this development in the past. Fitzgerald stated that
there is a lot of rock on the site. Fitzgerald stated that they went and did test holes and some areas they
were fine at 12’ deep and other areas where they were inches before rocks and that has likely discouraged
other developers from this land. Halley asked how many core drillings they did. Fitzgerald stated that
they did approximately 20 test holes. Halley asked if Fitzgerald is aware of the eligibility process to
create a District. Fitzgerald is unaware of the process but will talk more with Cramer and Beutler on the
details. Radford asked if there is a need for a bridge. Fitzgerald stated that there is a potential need for a
bridge on the development. Fitzgerald stated that they are trying to make the best use of the space.
Radford stated that the Agency is always looking to the future and have invested in areas that have been
slow to develop. Radford asked Fitzgerald why he feels this would sell in the markets he is looking into.
Fitzgerald stated that once you get into the site it does have a secluded feel and that will help with the
residential side of things. Fitzgerald stated that the INL is always needing housing for their interns and
workers just out of college. Fitzgerald stated that the light commercial uses would benefit the residential
and compliment each other with the two uses. Fitzgerald stated that the industrial would be a buffer and
they would do their best to create natural buffers.
Cramer stated that when they looked at the Comprehensive Plan they struggled at first with the idea of
residential and the they studied it and the Comprehensive Plan does say find creative ways to develop
areas like this that are industrial, but close to services, and a lot of ways this will ultimately become a
really good spot, but you can see where the rock starts to hit because the development hasn’t occurred
even to the industrial spot to the west. Cramer stated that the surface rock is the reality for the area.
Cramer showed some other areas in Idaho Falls that have people looking to develop, but they have the
same issue with the surface level rock, and it doesn’t make financial sense to invest in it without
assistance to make it viable.
Radford asked if there are any pathways in the area, for people to walk to the INL, as that would enhance
the property if the people could connect to the INL and the river. Beutler stated that the railroad corridor
is not part of the Connecting Our Community Pathways system. Beutler stated that Public Works is trying
to do a better job in putting in the public infrastructure and the sidewalk in the undeveloped area has
recently been installed by Science Center.
3
Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency July 15, 2021.
Radford instructed Fitzgerald to talk to Cramer and Beutler as they know the requirements and conditions
that have to be met and the process for approval. Radford stated that this is what the Agency is supposed
to be doing in helping with infill developments.
6. Northgate/1st Street Project Updates. Cramer stated that he got an interesting phone call
regarding the property that the Agency has been discussing on the Northgate and 1st Street project.
Cramer stated that today was supposed to be the auction for the Melina’s property but an investment
group out of Boise had put the property under contract on a cash deal and are also working on the
pharmacy building but were interested in what the Agency and the City wanted to see happen there.
Cramer sent the developer the Proforma and the Plan that had been developed with the EPA dollars and
they are interested in that plan but wanted to know if it had to be built exactly like that, which Cramer
informed them that no, it is a vision and a goal. Cramer had invited them to explain their vision and
explain to them about partnering on the other properties that the Agency could potentially purchase
options on. The developer had to drop off the call and was unable to discuss. Cramer indicted that the
properties are now under private contract, and they developer is still interested on the pharmacy building
if there is an opportunity to create a district and help with some of the property purchase costs or
reimbursement for the costs.
Radford asked how they were able to buy the Melina’s property out of a foreclosure process without
going to the auction. Chad Murdock stated that the foreclosure sale was set for yesterday and so they had
reached out to the previous owner who was being foreclosed against and worked out a deal to buy it
higher than the price that the Agency had discussed and then paid off the lien holder in full with fees
before the auction to make the property current and pay off the lien, so it never made it to sale and it was
paid off and the sale cancelled. Radford stated that the Agency could have helped accelerate that process.
Murdock stated that it is hard to say, but he had reached out to the owner a bunch, and the owner did call
Murdock when he was working out the deal with the other people. Murdock stated that it is crazy how
things work when property has sat for years and then suddenly property starts moving as soon as the
Agency has an interest.
Cramer stated that they haven’t given a lot of development plan, but they did state that they were
interested in doing residential and what mixed use they could do. Cramer doesn’t feel that the visions are
mis-aligned.
Radford asked if the Agency should push on the Chinese restaurant and get the option or see if the other
developer can buy it. Murdock stated that he is open to what ever instructions the Agency gives him.
Murdock stated that the Chinese restaurant owner is easy to get a hold of and has a family member that
wants to start the business back up, but the building is still sitting empty.
Murdock stated that the drug store on Northgate Mile is still for sale and available. Cramer stated that he
would get Murdock in touch with the developer (Ryan) and Cramer feels that they are interested in
expanding what the original project was, but not without assistance. Cramer stated that they bought what
they could with their capital and cash, but if there were some reimbursement dollars, they are willing to
expand. Murdock asked if the plan in buying Melina’s was to only develop that lot. Larsen asked if they
made any comment about the Chinese restaurant. Cramer stated that that the only comment was
regarding the Northgate mile building, and they weren’t seeing value in it unless there was purchase price
assistance.
4
Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency July 15, 2021.
Radford asked if there is an option out to the Chinese Restaurant. Murdock stated that they haven’t got
that far, and the owner had said $660,000 is where he would sell it, as that is the deal, he worked with the
family member. Murdock stated that he is likely more flexible.
Radford asked Larsen and Thompson to work with Cramer and Murdock on the Chinese restaurant and
determine how to approach that.
Thompson talked with Kelly Sayer briefly and he said he’d be willing to talk. Thompson is going to keep
trying to talk with Sayer about his property.
Radford stated that the City is making progress on 1st Street and the Agency needs to keep pushing.
7. RAI/Legislative Updates. Armbruster stated that the Property Tax Interim Committee has not
scheduled a meeting and there should be something scheduled in the next month and there is talk that it
may reconvene to deal with other issues and if they do other things could come up. Armbruster stated
that the House recessed, but did not adjourn, and so they could come back together and with concurrence
the Senate could too
Next Regular Meeting: August 19, 2021
Brent Thompson moved to adjourn the meeting, Thomas Halley seconded the motion and it passed
unanimously.
Radford adjourned the meeting at 12:50 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted: Beckie Thompson
5
Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency July 15, 2021.
Agenda
IDAHO FALLS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
P.O. BOX 50220
IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO 83405-0220
Thursday, July 15, 2021
Idaho Falls City Council Chambers
680 Park Avenue
AND via WebEx
Meeting Time: Noon
Idaho Falls believes in public participation and has identified at least four methods of participation.
1. Live Meeting Attendance: Members of the public may attend and provide testimony in person.
2. Via Livestream on the Internet: The public may view the meeting at www.idahofallsidaho.gov
3. Email: Public comments may be shared with the Planning board via email at bcramer@idahofallsidaho.gov.
Emails or other written testimony must be received no later than 5:00 p.m. on the Monday prior to the
meeting.
4. Live Meeting Attendance: Members of the public wishing to participate in a live meeting that has been
legally noticed for this agenda may do so remotely through the WebEx meeting platform with a phone or a
computer. This platform will allow citizens to provide testimony at the appropriate time. Those desiring
meeting access may send a valid and accurate email address to bcramer@idahofallsidaho.gov no later than
11:00 a.m. on July 15th so log-in information can be sent to you prior to the meeting OR follow this link
which will also access the meeting: https://tinyurl.com/IFRA71521
AGENDA
1. ACTION ITEM: Modifications, Additions, Changes to the Agenda
2. ACTION ITEM: Approval of Minutes: May 24, 2021
3. ACTION ITEM: Approval of expenditures and finance report
4. DISCUSSION ITEM: Update on Potential District Requests for small districts
5. DISCUSSION ITEM: Northgate/1st Street Project Updates
6. DISCUSSION ITEM: RAI and Legislative Updates
7. Next meeting August 19, 2021
Public hearing items are subject to change. If you have interest in a specific item, please contact the Planning Office at
208-612-8799. If you need communication aids or services or other physical accommodations to participate or access this
meeting or program of the City of Idaho Falls, you may contact Ann Peterson at 208-612-8799, or the ADA Coordinator,
Lisa Farris at 208-612-8323 and every effort will be made to adequately meet your needs.
IFRA Agenda 7-15-21
Get email alerts for Idaho Falls
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.