Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency
Regular MeetingIdaho Falls, ID · November 18, 2021
Minutes
IDAHO FALLS REDEVELOPMENT AGENC Y
P.O. BOX 50220
IDAHO FALLS, ID 83405
November 18, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes Council Chambers
Call to Order: Lee Radford called the meeting to order at 12:00.
Members Present: Lee Radford, Thomas Halley, Terri Gazdik, Brent Thompson, Chris Harvey (Via
WebEx), Kirk Larsen (via Webex)
Members Absent: Jon Walker
Also Present: Brad Cramer; Ryan Armbruster Esq. (via Webex,), Meghan Conrad, Esq. (via Webex)
Abbey Germaine, Esq. (via Webex); and interested citizens.
1. Modification to Agenda. None.
2. Approval of Minutes October 21, 2021. Armbruster had typographical errors requested to be
fixed. Thompson moved to approve the Minutes with modifications for October 21, 2021, Thomas
Halley seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously.
3. Approval of Expenditures and Finance Report. Lee Radford presented the Finance Report
dated November 18, 2021. In the River Commons Fund: Rebecca Thompson $87.50 for transcription;
Elam and Burke $1,135.20 for legal.
Kirk Larsen moved to approve the Finance Report dated November 18, 2021, Thomas Halley
seconded the motion. The Motion passed unanimously.
4. Approval of Engagement Letter with Rudd and Company for Financial Audit. Mark
Hagedorn stated that the City went out to bid on its financial audit services, and the company (Ide Bailey)
was asked to give a quote on the Redevelopment Association and the quote was almost double than what
was expected, and Hagedorn doesn’t feel it is warranted to have the price double, so they decided to stay
with Rudd and Company.
Radford indicated that they had discussed switching auditors when the City switched periodically, but the
bid was higher than anticipated and Radford consulted with Gazdik and after a bid from Rudd and
Company that was substantially lower (Rudd and Company = $6,750 – Ide Bailey = $12,000) they feel it
is good to stay with Rudd and Company.
Gazdik added that the Agency has diminished involvement in the various Districts currently, the overall
financial activity is lessened and so they had expected that the fee would go down, and Ide Bailey’s bid
did include travel cost, so it was substantially higher.
Radford agrees that the number of transactions has been reduced and there is not a need to incur a higher
bill.
Hagedorn indicated that they have already proceeded and so this is basically a ratification, as they need a
signed approval.
1
Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency November 18, 2021.
Terri Gazdik moved to ratify the approval and approve the Engagement Letter to Rudd and
Company, Thompson seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
5. MOU with Ryan Weimer for City Heights Urban Renewal District. Cramer stated that this is
the beginning to create an urban renewal district that will be named The City Heights Project. Cramer
showed on the aerial map the proposed boundaries that include the entire alley behind the old Melina’s
building, the property, the right of way along the block on 1st Street and Lee. Cramer explained that the
right of way is included because there are some potential improvements at the intersections that could be
done, and they didn’t want to limit the ability of the Agency to participate and expend funds on the rights
of way. Cramer explained that the MOU would authorize the consultant Renee Magee to work on the
eligibility report, as well as Elam and Burke to work on it. Cramer showed on item 5 page 3 there is a
requirement for the developer to supply $2500 in funding to get the projects going, and assuming the
eligibility report comes back that a district can be created, then there is a second portion where the
developer would supply $20,000 to proceed with the creation of the plan ($10,000 up front - $10,000
later.) Cramer pointed out item 8 on page 4 which includes that the Agency will match the contributions
of the developer up to $25,000.
Armbruster indicated that this MOU has come out of a work session that Cramer and Armbruster attended
with the developer, representative, and Renee Magee, and they feel that this MOU incorporates the items
discussed at the work session. Armbruster stated that the boundaries shown on the map are proposed
boundaries and ultimately those might be reduced. Armbruster stated that they wanted to start broad at
the outset and as the process continues to evolve, they can reduce the boundaries if they desire.
Armbruster stated that the Agency is contributing on a pro-rata basis with the developer (dollar for
dollar), and based on the anticipated workflow, the combined resources of the developer and Agency
should meet the cost of putting the District together.
Thompson asked how the boundaries interface with he proposed lane change that the City was going to
do on the north bound lane of Northgate Mile. Cramer stated that the proposed plan was to put an
extended left hand turn where traffic would cross and it would potentially involve moving the small
triangle building and cutting across parking lots, and when the plans were proposed it was assumed that
the Agency would be able to pick up options on the other buildings and those buildings sold, so this
doesn’t anticipate the full intersection change, but it does include the intersection of 1st and Northgate
Mile if there are upgrades needed to provide better access to 1st Street.
Radford reminded the Board that the money to help this developer is coming from the funds that City
Council reserved for the Agency ($200,000) from the distribution the Agency returned last year.
Armbruster stated that they have looked back at the agreement between the City and the Agency, and the
agreement does allow the Agency to use the monies for purposes of paying for the cost of consultants and
others to prepare an Urban Renewal Plan, so it is an appropriate use of funds moving forward.
Radford asked if they have confirmed that this developer owns the property and has an LLC. Cramer
indicated that the LLC name was provided by the developer who is the owner of the property.
Radford feels these smaller districts will help with infill projects that are around town and if this is a
successful model, they could encourage more dense urban development.
Kirk Larsen moved to approve the execution of the MOU with City Heights, Thomas Halley
seconded the motion. The Motion passed unanimously.
2
Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency November 18, 2021.
6. MOU with Derek Ence for Pancheri- East Bank Urban Renewal District. Cramer showed the
former Pancheri Yellowstone Boundary and indicted that this District would be within that old District.
Cramer showed the proposed project area, including the Old King B Jerky Plant existed. Cramer
indicated that they will be demolishing the building and build a new hotel. Cramer stated that they cannot
create a new District with the same boundaries of an old District. Cramer stated that the boundaries will
be fluid as they move through the process of creating the District and they are trying to protect potential
access points to Yellowstone, and the most ideal access point is to come further south on Yellowstone,
and they would have to work with another property owner. Cramer stated that the access point that is
straight east of the property has some potential issues and would require engagement with other property
owners. Cramer stated that they are trying to meet the needs of the new District without creating the old
Pancheri-Yellowstone District. Cramer stated that the agreement is very similar to the previous agreement
with City Heights with the difference being the amounts due to the Agency not being able to contribute to
this project like it can with City Heights. Cramer stated that this will begin the process of an eligibility
report and anticipates leading to an Urban Renewal Plan that would be approved by this Board and City
Council.
Armbruster stated that the boundaries will be fluid and this MOU anticipates questions that will arise
about the previous Pancheri-Yellowstone area.
Derek Ence stated that they created Sentinel Properties more than a decade ago to hold various properties
and it owns the land and the building on this property, as well as Ball Packing cold storage building that is
leased out to an ice manufacturer. Ence stated that they intend to demolish the King B Plan and develop a
hotel on the site along with the Hansen Family. Ence has looked at the agreement and is in agreement
with the terms and understands his obligations. Radford asked if they have started the discussions with
the other property owners to participate. Ence stated that they have not discussed it with the owners yet
and they have talked about how to approach the property owners. Ence stated that the only obstacle they
see is the parcel to the south that is owned by another owner, and they would have to discuss with them
and see if they can get them on board. Ence stated that they feel that Cramer will be the best person to
approach that property owner on behalf of the City.
Radford asked if they would have to create city standard streets. Cramer stated that if they have access to
the south yes, they would, but if it goes north, it would be more of a modified access point.
Brent Thompson moved to approve the MOU with Sentinel Properties for the Pancheri-East Bank
Urban Renewal District, Terri Gazdik seconded the motion. The Motion passed unanimously.
7. Request for Extension for Dr. Lee Project. Dr. Brian Lee. Lee stated that they were able to get a
grant from the Agency for lava blasting and rock removal, and they have used those funds and the
building is progressing, but because of many factors they have needed to extend deadlines. Lee stated
that last May he partnered with Dr. Dan Marshall (Dermatologist), and this is now a joint project. Lee
stated that the building is progressing, but it is taking longer than anticipated due to supply chain
problems, worker shortages, etc. Lee stated that the exterior of the building is 95% complete, the second
level is painted and getting ready to put in cabinets and flooring and the main level is behind the second.
Lee stated that they have an estimated completion date in a few months. Lee stated that they had an
extension on an original deadline that was extended to the end of the year, and they are now requesting
another extension to March 31 to make sure that they don’t have to ask again.
Radford asked if they are planning on occupancy in January or February. Lee stated that the upper level
is trying to get occupancy then, but the main level is behind that. Radford confirmed that Dr. Marshall
3
Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency November 18, 2021.
will have the second floor. Lee stated that he has a lot of medical MedGas piping and that was hard to get
fixtures for that, and a lot of the drywall had to be delayed getting the MedGas fixtures in.
Radford indicated that they have to keep the County apprised because the District ended 2 years ago.
Radford does appreciate the building that is being built and it will be worth the patience. Radford knows
the building is going to get done, but the Agency is accountable to the taxpayers. Radford stated that
currently the agreement is they have to have a CO by the end of the year. Radford asked if they are
asking for a certain fixed date. Cramer stated that Dr. Lee is requesting a date certain. Dr. Lee stated that
the fixed dates have been helpful for goals, but sometimes things are out of their hands, and they just
can’t get the materials. Radford stated that the risk to the Agency was that they would invest in the
building, and it wouldn’t be completed in a way that wouldn’t pay property taxes, but clearly this building
is going to be completed and put in operation to start paying for what Dr. Lee has invested.
Cramer stated that the Agency needs to consider that in order to get a CO (not just temporary) they need
to push farther than March 31st because the City requires landscaping and parking lots done before they
issue CO and if the landscaping is not done, it won’t be done by the end of March with winters the way
they are in Idaho. Cramer suggested pushing out until June. Gazdik agreed and thought June 30th would
be a better date to give them the opportunity to get into the building.
Thompson asked about the criteria for temporary CO. Cramer stated that if they have passed all the other
inspections other than the zoning inspection for landscaping, they can have a temporary CO.
Radford stated that this building will start generating property taxes in 2022 and the risk to the Agency
and the taxpayers has passed. Radford doesn’t feel that they need to be too tight.
Dr. Lee is anxious to get into the building and see patients, as well as Dr. Marshall. Dr. Lee wants to get
in as soon as possible.
Thomas Halley moved to extend the project to June 30, 2022 for Dr. Lee to obtain a Certificate of
Occupancy, Terri Gazdik seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
8. RAI/Legislative Updates. Armbruster stated that the Redevelopment Association Board will be
meeting later today to address issues and try to outline what 2022 might have in store for them on the
Legislative front. Armbruster stated that the reconvened Legislator came into town on Monday and
despite the fact that there were 29 Bills offered, no Bill went through the whole process. There were a
few Bills approved by the House, but the Senate rejected the Bills or didn’t take them at all. Armbruster
stated that the only thing that came out of the session was a joint memorial between the House and the
Senate expressing the Legislators opposition to the Federal Administration Vaccine Mandate. Armbruster
stated that the Property Tax Interim Committee was scheduled to meet tomorrow, but that has been
cancelled, and they may or may not meet again before Legislature reconvenes the 1st part of January.
Halley asked Armbruster if he will be at the AIC Legislative on December 3rd. Armbruster will be in
attendance, and he will go in and register for that session.
Radford stated that they have been asked for their input for the Idaho Falls Chamber of Commerce
Annual Legislative Priorities for redevelopment agencies. Radford has asked RAI and Armbruster to give
a one sentence of what they feel they need to advocate for to have the best processes for urban renewal
and tax increment financing, and Armbruster will get back to Radford so he can give his input to the
Chamber and to the local Legislators.
4
Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency November 18, 2021.
Radford asked if the Eligibility Reports will be done by December 20th. Cramer feels that they will be
done in January, so they might be able to cancel the December meeting.
Next Regular Meeting: December 20, 2021.
Thomas Halley moved to adjourn the meeting, Brent Thompson seconded the motion and it passed
unanimously.
Radford adjourned the meeting at 12:45 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted: Beckie Thompson
5
Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency November 18, 2021.
Agenda
IDAHO FALLS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
P.O. BOX 50220
IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO 83405-0220
Thursday, November 18, 2021
Idaho Falls City Council Chambers
680 Park Avenue
AND via WebEx
Meeting Time: Noon
Idaho Falls believes in public participation and has identified at least four methods of participation.
1. Live Meeting Attendance: Members of the public may attend and provide testimony in person.
2. Via Livestream on the Internet: The public may view the meeting at www.idahofallsidaho.gov
3. Email: Public comments may be shared with the Planning board via email at bcramer@idahofallsidaho.gov.
Emails or other written testimony must be received no later than 5:00 p.m. on the Monday prior to the
meeting.
4. Live Meeting Attendance: Members of the public wishing to participate in a live meeting that has been
legally noticed for this agenda may do so remotely through the WebEx meeting platform with a phone or a
computer. This platform will allow citizens to provide testimony at the appropriate time. Those desiring
meeting access may send a valid and accurate email address to bcramer@idahofallsidaho.gov no later than
11:00 a.m. on November 18th so log-in information can be sent to you prior to the meeting OR follow this
link which will also access the meeting: https://tinyurl.com/IFRA111821
AGENDA
1. ACTION ITEM: Modifications, Additions, Changes to the Agenda
2. ACTION ITEM: Approval of Minutes: October 21, 2021
3. ACTION ITEM: Approval of Expenditures and Finance Report
4. ACTION ITEM: Approval of Engagement Letter with Rudd and Company for Financial Audit
5. ACTION ITEM: MOU with Ryan Weimer for City Heights Urban Renewal District
6. ACTION ITEM: MOU with Derek Ence for Pancheri-East Bank Urban Renewal District
7. ACTION ITEM: Request for extension for Dr. Lee Project
8. DISCUSSION ITEM: RAI and Legislative Update
9. Next Meeting: December 20, 2021
Public hearing items are subject to change. If you have interest in a specific item, please contact the Planning Office at
208-612-8799. If you need communication aids or services or other physical accommodations to participate or access this
meeting or program of the City of Idaho Falls, you may contact Ann Peterson at 208-612-8799, or the ADA Coordinator,
Lisa Farris at 208-612-8323 and every effort will be made to adequately meet your needs.
IFRA Agenda 11-18-21
Get email alerts for Idaho Falls
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.