Planning Board
Regular MeetingLaconia, NH · December 1, 2020
Minutes
CITY OF LACONIA PLANNING BOARD
6:30 PM City Hall - Armand A. Bolduc Council Chamber
Accepted January 5, 2021
12/1/2020 - Minutes
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Peter Brunette read the emeeting introduction:
As Chair of the Laconia Board, due to the COVID-19/Coronavirus crisis and in accordance with Governor
Sununu’s Emergency Order #12 pursuant to Executive Order 2020-04, this Board is authorized to meet
electronically.
Please note that there is no physical location to observe and listen to the meeting, which was authorized
pursuant to the Governor’s Emergency Order. However, in accordance with the Emergency Order, this is to
confirm that we are:
a) Providing public access to the meeting by telephone, with additional access possibilities by video or
other electronic means;
We are utilizing the Zoom platform for this meeting where all members of the Board will have the ability to
communicate, and the public will have access to watch the live YouTube video at
https://www.youtube.com/laconianh, listen to this meeting through dialing the following phone # 1-312-626-
6799 or 1-646-558-8656 or participate with the Zoom app. Webinar ID 824 4388 0229, Webinar Password
005909.
b) Providing public notice of the necessary information for accessing the meeting;
We previously gave notice to the public of how to access the meeting using Zoom, and instructions are
provided on the City of Laconia’s website at
c) Providing a mechanism for the public to alert the public body during the meeting if there are problems
with access;
If anybody has a problem, please call 524-3877 x 249 or email at: planning@laconianh.gov
d) Adjourning the meeting if the public is unable to access the meeting.
In the event the public is unable to access the meeting, we will adjourn the meeting and have it rescheduled
at that time.
Please note that all votes that are taken during this meeting shall be done by Roll Call vote.
Let’s start the meeting by taking a Roll Call attendance. When each member states their presence, also
please state whether there is anyone in the room with you during this meeting, which is required under the
Right-to-Know law.
The meeting was called to order at 6:36 PM
2. ROLL CALL
Members physically present: Bruce Cheney, Charlie St. Clair, Mike DellaVecchia
Members remotely present via Zoom: Edwin Bones, Rich MacNeill, Kirk Beattie, Jewel Fox, Brett Beliveau,
Stacy Soucy, Peter Brunette
Absent: Sarah Jenna
All members of the board via Zoom were alone in the room and quorum established.
Alternate members B. Beliveau and S. Soucy were seated as a voting members.
3. RECORDING SECRETARY
Kalena Graham
Alternate members B. Beliveau and S. Soucy were seated as a voting members.
3. RECORDING SECRETARY
Kalena Graham
4. STAFF IN ATTENDANCE
Planning Director Dean Trefethen, Zoom Host Assistant Planner Rob Mora
5. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS
5.I. Acceptance of Minutes from November 4
With no objections, Chair P. Brunette declared the minutes accepted
6. PRESENTATIONS
7. EXTENSIONS Note: The purpose of this agenda section is for the board to consider requests from
applicants with previously approved projects to extend the deadline dates. The board may also deliberate
the request, decide and conduct a final vote at this time. PUBLIC INPUT IS NOT TAKEN ON EXTENSION
REQUESTS.
8. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS, CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE VOTE Note: The purpose of this
agenda section is for the Board to continue the Public Hearing for the applicant and the public to provide
input. The Board may also deliberate the application, decide and conduct a final vote at this time.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS, POSSIBLE CONSIDERATION AND VOTE Note: The purpose of this agenda section
is for the Board to have a presentation from the applicant and open a Public Hearing for the public to provide
input. The Board may also deliberate the application, decide and conduct a final vote at this time.
9.I. PL2020-0094CUP(wetland); 17 Western Terrace; Proposal to use 20 ft of the 50 ft wetland buffer
Jon Bernard addressed the board via Zoom. He would like to use 20 feet of the 50 ft buffer area as lawn
area. There will be no impervious surface.
The public hearing opened at 6:39 PM. No one spoke for or against the application.
The public hearing closed at 6:40 PM.
Planning Director D. Trefethen mentioned that when the sewer line was put in for the development more
land was disturbed than intended due to what they came across while digging. The rest of the area will
be left to naturally grow up. Conservation Commission took all of this into consideration and was ok
with the use of the lawn.
There are still a few villages not fully built out and some small villages left to be built in the development.
B. Beliveau suggested there be a condition that no structures can be built unless they come back to
the Planning Board. J. Bernard had no issue with that condition.
Motion to approve the application with the dates and conditions as stated in the staff review, with the
added condition that no structure be built in the 50 ft wetland buffer without Planning Board approval
made by K. Beattie, B. Cheney seconded. All voted in favor by roll call vote.
9.II. PL2020-0096SP; 110 Hilliard Rd; Proposal to add a single family residence on the property that
currently houses a duplex to make for multifamily
John Sheehy addressed the Board. He explained the proposal. There is currently a duplex on the 3.5
acres and they would like to add a single family home to the lot which, in turn, makes for a multifamily,
which requires Planning Board approval.
currently houses a duplex to make for multifamily
John Sheehy addressed the Board. He explained the proposal. There is currently a duplex on the 3.5
acres and they would like to add a single family home to the lot which, in turn, makes for a multifamily,
which requires Planning Board approval.
The public hearing opened at 6:52 PM. No one spoke for or against the application.
The public hearing closed at 6:52 PM.
Planning Director D. Trefethen noted that this also has a conditional use permit due to the location of
the septic system. There is a 75 ft buffer due to the proximity to the water body. The Conservation
Commission was happy with the proposal and the water flow heading to the center of the property and
away from the wetlands. The applicant received a special exception for the third unit from the Zoning
Board. E. Bones asked if there were other multifamily units in the area and Planning Director D.
Trefethen stated there are a mix of campgrounds and duplex in the surrounding area. Water is served
by the City but private sewer. This lot would be difficult to subdivide in the future due to the location of
the structures.
Motion to approve the application with the dates and conditions as stated in the staff review made by B.
Cheney, K. Beattie seconded. All voted in favor by roll call vote.
Chair P. Brunette recused himself from the next application and Vice Chair E. Bones stepped in.
9.III. PL2020-0098SP, 0099CUP(perf zon); 41-63 Elm/9 Park Street; Proposal to construct mixed use
buildings with associated parking
Steve Smith addressed the Board. He explained the project. This was before the Board in August for
conceptual review without much change since that. The existing buildings will be demolished, the lots
will be merged and new buildings with full foundations will be constructed. Commercial on the first floor
and residential units on the second and third floors. The sidewalk along Elm will be redone and City
maintained. The intersections of Railroad/Elm and Park/Elm will be redone and maintained by the
property owner. Parking will be reorganized along Elm and Railroad Ave. A new covered access will be
constructed in the rear with access only form Park Street. This will give a total of 58 parking spaces.
Compared to the existing buildings, the new structures will be all on the private property and not
encroach on City right of way. The performance zoning conditional use permit is being requested for
relief on the front setback. The buildings are still under design and minor adjustments will probably need
to be done. The applicant is waiting to hear back from DPW regarding the sewer line and see if the
apartment can tie into it.
The public hearing opened at 7:13 PM
Peter Brunette of 15 Park Street addressed the Board via Zoom. He is very much in favor of the project
and the layout and the sidewalk. Parking is needed in Lakeport Square. He noted that he hadn’t heard
any negative comments from people except for the displaced folks in the existing building.
The public hearing closed at 7:19 PM
The proposed bridge will only be used for residents and under the bridge is access to the parking.
Staff Review: Planning Director D. Trefethen read the staff review. He noted that the plans have been
looked at by all the departments and there is a meeting tomorrow at the site to discuss the demolition.
Motion to approve the application with the dates and conditions as stated in the staff review made by B.
Beliveau, B. Cheney seconded. All voted in favor by roll call vote.
Chair P. Brunette stepped back in as chair.
9.IV. 04-016SPamd2; 135 Weirs Blvd, Boulevard Commons; Proposal to amend the original application to
allow for park models, skirting, and decks
Motion to accept the application made by E. Bones, B. Beliveau seconded. All voted in favor by roll call
Chair P. Brunette stepped back in as chair.
9.IV. 04-016SPamd2; 135 Weirs Blvd, Boulevard Commons; Proposal to amend the original application to
allow for park models, skirting, and decks
Motion to accept the application made by E. Bones, B. Beliveau seconded. All voted in favor by roll call
vote.
Applicant: Mike Patenaude addressed the Board via Zoom. He explained the proposal. When the RVs
were approved the area had more transient and since has been condominiumized and the people are
more long term. Decks, skirting and park model were not allowed per the original approval, but some
decks had been put on with City permission and building permits. The decks are platforms and not
attached to anything with an average size of about 120 sf. There are 10 units and about half have
decks. The applicant didn’t have any objection with a size limit on any new decks but would like the
existing to remain. The property owners don’t want the site to be an eyesore and keep things to a
minimum. Each site has a 400 sf area. The site is only open April 1-October 31.
The public hearing opened at 7:45 PM
Matthew Monkiewicz of 147 Weirs Blvd Unit #3 addressed the Board via Zoom. He asked about
ownership and M. Patenaude explained that most of the owners are fairly new now. M. Monkiewicz
asked about rentals in the units and M. M. Patenaude said that the bylaws says a minimum of 30 days
for rentals with Condo Board approval. M. Monkiewicz had an issue with past noise issues from rentals
and mentioned the 8 ft stockade fence was in need of maintenance.
Wayne Moriarty of 147 Weirs Blvd addressed the Board via Zoom. He asked about height restrictions
and setbacks. He was told that because it needs to be on the road all have to be under 13.6 feet.
Staff Review: Planning Director D. Trefethen read the staff review. He noted that he would check on the
fence issue to see what the situation was at the time.
Motion to approve the application with the dates and conditions as stated in the staff review made by B.
Beliveau, R. MacNeill seconded. All voted in favor by roll call vote.
10. APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE Note: The purpose of this agenda section is to publicize that a Planning
Board application has been submitted AND for the Planning Board to determine if the application is
complete enough to begin the review process. PUBLIC INPUT IS NOT TAKEN AT THIS TIME. If the
application is accepted the Planning Board will schedule a Public Hearing at which time the application will
be heard and public comments will be accepted. Information about applications can be obtained on the
city’s web site or by calling the Planning office.
10.I. PL20200066SU, 0067CUP(cluster), 0068CUP(wetland); Mile Hill Road, Mountain Lake Village; proposal
for a 51 lot (18 in Belmont, 33 Laconia) cluster subdivision with underground utilities & sidewalk
Planning Director D. Trefethen noted that there are some outstanding issues but are working with the
applicant.
Motion to accept the application made by B. Cheney, C. St. Clair seconded. All voted in favor by roll
call vote.
11. NEW BUSINESS
11.I. Capital Improvement Committee (CIP) recommendations to Planning Board
Assistant Planner R. Mora went over the CIP process.
Motion to forward the Planning Board recommendations to City Council made by S. Soucy, B. Cheney
seconded. C. St. Clair asked if putting down concrete instead of pavement on bridges was discussed at
all and was told no. There was a discussion on bike lanes on Weirs Blvd. The motion passed by roll
call vote. M. DellaVeccha abstained from the vote as he recently arrived to the meeting.
12. OLD BUSINESS
Motion to forward the Planning Board recommendations to City Council made by S. Soucy, B. Cheney
seconded. C. St. Clair asked if putting down concrete instead of pavement on bridges was discussed at
all and was told no. There was a discussion on bike lanes on Weirs Blvd. The motion passed by roll
call vote. M. DellaVeccha abstained from the vote as he recently arrived to the meeting.
12. OLD BUSINESS
12.I. Update on Weirs Beach Village sidewalks along Hilliard
Planning Director D. Trefethen explained that the development is close to being done. The last few
houses are under construction. The sidewalk along Hillard needs to be constructed. The original
approval has it located on the southerly edge. There are right of way and slope issues. Staff met with
the applicant and what makes the most sense is to construct it on the other side and create a safe
crosswalk across Hillard. Planning Director D. Trefethen was looking to see if the Board wanted the
applicant to go before the Board or if they are in favor that change going through the administrative
review process. The Board was in agreement.
13. PLANNING DEPT REPORT
Master Plan Steering Committee: Planning Director D. Trefethen has been working with the Mayor and
reaching out to members regarding meeting dates and get it going again.
He also brought up sidewalks. There is a disconnect between the Planning Board policy and DPW. He feels
that this might be able to be corrected by a small subcommittee with Board members, Staff and DPW. E.
Bones and R. MacNeill volunteered to be on that committee.
Planning Director D. Trefethen brought up short term lodging and the fact that there are some things that
need to be reworked now that they have been working with it for over a year. The thought was the MPSC
could work on that.
14. LIAISON REPORTS
LRPC: Assistant Planner R. Mora stated there was a meeting the night prior and demographics and
economic growth was discussed. Chair P. Brunette requested that another take his spot as he hasn’t been
able to make many meetings. S. Soucy volunteered.
Conservation Commission: Planning Director D. Trefethen noted that the Commission has been working on
making revisions to the wetland ordinance and a draft should be before the board in the next few months.
Council: B. Cheney noted that he is in support on the decision for the Board discussions in amending the
short term lodging.
Historical District Commission: C. St. Clair mentioned there was a meeting last week and the Commission
is looking to expand the historical overlay district.
15. OTHER BUSINESS
Chair P. Brunette brought up the Mayor’s Homeless Task Force and brought up a few points discussed at
the last meeting. He stated that it is a shared issue in surrounding communities.
C. St. Clair brought up Barton’s Motel sign has been removed earlier in the day.
16. ADJOURNMENT
With nothing further to discuss, Chair P. Brunette adjourned the meeting at 8:33 PM.
Respectfully,
K. Graham
Respectfully,
K. Graham
Get email alerts for Laconia
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.