City Planning Commission

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, August 8, 2018 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4:00 P.M. Planning Commission Members: Phil Folyer, Jesse Fox, Gary W. Green, Stan Jochim, Charles Matthews, Richard Siler, and Jared Von Tobel Adjunct Member(s): Jamie Baird & Tom Sahlberg Staff: Lisa Key, Kelsey Wright. Barbara Barker 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Review of Agenda 4. Approval of Minutes: July 11, 2018 5. Ratification of Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations: • CPA2018-0001 • CPA2018-0002 • CPA2018-003 6. DISCUSSIONS/ PRESENTATIONS • Low Impact Development Presentation – Lee First, Outreach Coordinator with Spokane Riverkeeper • Planning & Building Permit Stats for First Half of 2018 – Barbara Barker • Update on Planning & Building Reorganization • Strategic Plan Status Update & Schedule – Lisa Key 7. Secretary’s Report 8. Planning Commissioner Reports 9. Citizens Comments 10. Adjournment Next Meeting: September 12, 2018 Non-hearing items scheduled, and their order, are only tentative and are subject to change. The Planning Commission may not address all items as listed and/or may continue certain items to a later session. The Commission reserves the right to take action on all items listed on the agenda. The Planning Commission provides at least 3 minutes for public comment and submission of written comments for inclusion into the public record and consideration by the Planning Commission is encouraged. For more information, please contact Planning & Building Services at 755-6708. The public is invited to attend. Parking and meeting rooms are accessible for persons with disabilities. Contact the City at 755-6700 with 48-hours advance notice for special accommodations.  PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES WEDNESDAY, July 11, 2018 Planning Commission Members Present: Phil Folyer, Jesse Fox, Gary W. Green, Stan Jochim, Charles Matthews, Richard Siler Adjunct Member(s) Present: Jamie Baird Absent: Jared Von Tobel, Tom Sahlberg Staff Present: Lisa Key, Kelsey Wright, Barbara Barker Call to Order: Meeting was called to order at 4:04 p.m. Roll Call: A quorum of members was present. Public Hearing: 2018 Code Amendment Requests Commissioner Jochim reviewed the process and expectations for the hearing. Lisa Key presented a brief staff report on the proposed code amendments. Kevin Schneidmiller presented on behalf of Greenstone’s proposed code amendments. No public testimony was heard on the proposed amendments. Public testimony was closed at 4:46 PM. The Planning Commission opened deliberations, taking each case separately. Greenstone/CPA2018-0001 In the matter of CPA2018-0001, a request for amendment to city of liberty lake municipal code § 10-4c-5 (a) & river district sap 08-001 development regulations §10-4c-5(a), regarding bonding and assurances for required site improvements, Commissioner Folyer recused himself, as a developer who works within the City of Liberty Lake. Upon deliberation, the Planning Commission concluded that: • The proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is not detrimental to the public welfare. • The proposed amendment is warranted by a change in economic conditions. • The proposed amendment is deemed necessary as being in the public interest. On this basis, Commissioner Matthews moved to recommend approval. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Siler. A roll call vote followed, the motion was approved: 6 Ayes, 0 Nays, 1 Abstention. Greenstone/CPA2018-0002 In the matter of CPA2018-0002, a request for amendment to section 4.1 of RD-SAP 08-001, the river district zoning matrix, to include recreational vehicle storage as an allowable use in the RD- Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 1|3 July 11, 2018 M (River District – Neighborhood Center) zone, upon deliberation, the Planning Commission concluded that: • The proposed amendment not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is detrimental to the public welfare (two of seven Commissioners dissented with this conclusion). • The proposed amendment is not warranted by a change in economic, technological and/or land use conditions. • The proposed amendment is not necessary to correct an error. • The proposed amendment is not necessary to clarify meaning or intent. • The proposed amendment is necessary to provide for a proposed use that was not previously addressed (two of seven Commissioners dissented with this conclusion). • The proposed amendment is not deemed necessary as being in the public interest (one of seven Commissioners dissented with this conclusion. On this basis, Commissioner Matthews moved to recommend that the application not be approved. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Siler. A roll call vote followed, the motion was approved: 6 Ayes, 1 Nay. Greenstone/CPA2018-0003 In the matter of CPA2018-0003, a request for amendment Liberty Lake Municipal Code § 10-2c- 7, lot area dimensions, coverage & residential densities, eliminating minimum and maximum lot areas in the R-2 zone, upon deliberation, the Planning Commission concluded that: • The proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is not detrimental to the public welfare (one of seven Commissioner dissented with this conclusion). • The proposed amendment is warranted by a change in economic, technological and/or land use conditions (three of seven Commissioners dissented with this conclusion). • The proposed amendment is deemed necessary as being in the public interest (three of seven Commissioners dissented with this conclusion). On this basis, Commissioner Siler moved to recommend approval. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Matthews. A roll call vote followed, the motion was approved: 6 Ayes, 1 Nay. The public hearing was closed at 5:58 PM Approval of Minutes: June 13th minutes were approved. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 2|3 July 11, 2018 Discussions /Presentations: The following agenda items were deferred until the August meeting. A. Planning and Building Permit Stats for First Half of 2018 B. Strategic Plan Status Update and Schedule Secretary’s Report: Lisa Key reported on upcoming meeting agenda items: • August 8th o Low Impact Development Presentation by the River Keepers o (tentative) City of Liberty Lake Strategic Plan Update o (tentative) Update on Building, Planning & Engineering Reorganization o Deferred topics from 7-11-18 Meeting, Permits Stats & Strategic Plan Update • September 12th o Work Program Discussion o LQA Update Planning Commissioner Reports: No reports at this time. Citizens Comments: None were made. Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at 6:04p.m. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 3|3 July 11, 2018  FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE MATTER OF CASE NO. LUA2018-0036 / CPA2018-0001, A REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE MUNICIPAL CODE § 10-4C-5 (A) & RIVER DISTRICT SAP 08-001 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS §10-4C-5(A), REGARDING BONDING AND ASSURANCES FOR REQUIRED SITE IMPROVEMENTS. HEARING DATE: July 11, 2018 @ 4:00 p.m. PROPOSAL SUMMARY: Location Citywide Applicant(s) Greenstone 2018 Development Code Text Amendment Proposal Information LUA2018-0036 / CPA2018-0001 Code Chapter / Section Proposed Amendment Liberty Lake Municipal Code Section 10-4C-5 (A) & River District SAP 08- 001 Development Regulations §10-4C-5(A), regarding bonding and assurances for required site improvements. Proposed Amendment: 10-4C-5 Bonding and Assurances Article 10-4C Site Design A. Performance Bonds. On all projects where project related Review improvements are required, the City shall require a bond in an amount not greater than 150% of the private cost as a condition of development approval in order to guarantee the improvements. Issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for fee simple residential units will not require a bond or assurance. Payment of a re-inspection and conversion fees will be required. STATE OF WASHINGTON REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, AUTHORITY & REQUIREMENTS: RCW 36.70A: Growth Management Act (GMA): Liberty Lake is mandated to plan under GMA. The City’s Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations were developed in accordance with the requirements of GMA. Development Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 1 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0036 / CPA2018-0001  Regulations are required to implement the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and any amendments to City Development Code must be consistent with the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan. The City must provide reasonable public notice of proposed amendments and opportunities for public participation. WAC 365-196: Growth Management -- Procedural Criteria for Adopting Comprehensive Plans and Development Regulations Development code amendments must comply with procedures established in WAC 365-196, including rules regarding internal consistency, interjurisdictional coordination, public participation requirements, and notification to the Department of Commerce of “intent to adopt” proposed code amendments at least 60 days prior to final adoption. WAC 197-11: State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Rules: Development code amendments are subject to SEPA review as a non-project action, in accordance with procedures established in WAC 197-11. CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK & PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS: City Code §10-4B-5: Type IV Projects: Comprehensive Plan and Development Code Amendments are classified as Type IV Projects in the City of Liberty Lake Development Code and are considered legislative decisions. The procedural requirements and decision criteria are detailed in City Development Code §10-4B-5. SEPA REVIEW: SEPA Checklists were completed for the proposed Comprehensive Plan & Development Code Amendments. The City of Liberty Lake Planning & Building Services determined that the proposals, as non- project reviews, would have no significant adverse environmental impacts and issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) and Adoption of Existing Environmental Document on the 2018 Development Code Text Amendments on June 13, 2018. The City adopted the Spokane County Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan that was prepared on November 22, 2000 and was previously adopted for the original City of Liberty Lake Comprehensive Plan and Development Code, as well as the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Liberty Lake Urban Growth Area Boundary Alternatives that was prepared on December 13, 2006. The Notice of Availability, SEPA Checklist and Threshold Determination, and Amendment Lists were routed to agencies on June 11, 2018 and a Notice of Availability was posted at the Liberty Lake Municipal Library and at City Hall, as well as being published in the June 15, 2018 edition of the Valley News Herald. On June 13, 2018, the Notice of Availability, SEPA Checklist and Threshold Determination, and Amendment Lists were also posted on the City website, and the notice and a link to the City website was emailed to the public notice group, as well as the amendment applicants. Comments on the SEPA Checklist and Threshold Determination were due by 4 p.m., on June 26, 2018. No comments were received. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION: March 30, 2018 Applications Received April 11, 2018 Planning Commission Workshop: Agenda & packet published on City website & distributed to City’s “Notify Me” e- Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 2 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0036 / CPA2018-0001  mail distribution list May 9, 2018 Planning Commission Workshop: Agenda & packet published on City website & distributed to City’s “Notify Me” e- mail distribution list June 13, 2018 Planning Commission Workshop: Agenda & packet published on City website & distributed to City’s “Notify Me” e- mail distribution list June 13, 2018 SEPA Notice of Availability Issued: NOA packet with SEPA checklist and DNS e-mailed to involved agencies, adjacent jurisdictions, “Notify Me” e-mail distribution list & posted on website June 15, 2018 SEPA Notice of Availability: Published in Valley News Herald June 26, 2018 SEPA Comment Period Ends SEPA appeal period begins June 27, 2018 Planning Commission Public Hearing Notice: Published on City website & distributed to City’s “Notify Me” e-mail distribution list June 29, 2018 Planning Commission Public Hearing Notice: Published in Valley News Herald July 11, 2018 Planning Commission Hearing & Recommendation: Agenda & staff report published on City website & distributed to City’s “Notify Me” e-mail distribution list on July 6th AGENCY REVIEW: SEPA Distribution List & Adjacent Jurisdictions: Liberty Lake Police Department; Avista; Century Link; Central Valley School District; City of Spokane Valley; CDA Tribe; Comcast; Spokane Clean Air; Spokane Valley Fire District; Spokane Transit Authority; Spokane Regional Health District; Spokane Tribe; WS Department of Ecology; S Department of Fish & Wildlife; WS Department of Natural Resources; WS Department of Transportation; Spokane Regional Transportation Council; Liberty Lake Water & Sewer District; Consolidated Irrigation District Spokane County Utilities; Spokane County Planning; WS Department of Commerce. Agencies Notified Notification Comment Summary SEPA Distribution List & SEPA Notice of Availability; No comments received Adjacent Jurisdictions Proposed Amendment Summary; Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) Emailed 6/11/18 Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 3 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0036 / CPA2018-0001 PUBLIC COMMENTS (WRITTEN): Name & Address Comment Summary N/A No comments received RELEVANT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOALS & POLICIES: Governance Policy 1: The City shall use the website, email, social media, newsletters, local newspapers, special announcements and other techniques to keep the community well-informed. Housing Goal 2: Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments, promote a variety of densities and housing types, and encourage the preservation of existing housing stock. Housing Policy 2: Periodically assess the effects of policies and regulations on the affordability of housing, fair housing choice, and examine the need to reduce regulatory barriers. STAFF ANALYSIS: The proposed amendment will reduce cost and improve efficiency both for the developer and the City. The City will not issue a temporary certificate of occupancy (TCO) if essential services and infrastructure (water, sewer, etc.) are not available. Bonding for landscaping, sidewalks, and driveways is time- consuming, staff intensive, and costly for both the developer and the City. The City will not issue a final Certificate of Occupancy (CO) unless the required improvements have been completed. The proposed revisions are consistent with the practice of other jurisdictions in Spokane County. FINDINGS: 1. The required SEPA review has been completed on the proposed amendment. 2. All public and agency notice requirements were met and accomplished in a timely manner. 3. The public was provided the opportunity for early and continuous participation. 4. The public had the opportunity to submit written comments and testify at a public hearing before the Planning Commission. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL: The criteria for approval of a code amendment are established in City Code §10-4B-5(A), which states: A. Criteria for Amendment: The City may amend development regulations when it finds that any of the following applies: 1. Such amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is not detrimental to the public welfare; 2. Change in economic, technological, or land use conditions has occurred to warrant modification; 3. It is found that an amendment is necessary to correct an error; Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 4 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0036 / CPA2018-0001  4. It is found that an amendment is necessary to clarify meaning or intent; 5. It is found that an amendment is necessary to provide for a use(s) that was not previously addressed; or 6. Those amendments as deemed necessary by the City Council as being in the public interest. CONCLUSIONS: In reviewing the application, the Planning Commission unanimously made the following conclusions in consideration of their recommendation: 1. The proposed amendment IS consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and IS NOT detrimental to the public welfare. 2. The proposed amendment IS warranted by a change in economic conditions. 3. The proposed amendment IS deemed necessary as being in the public interest. RECOMMENDATION: In the matter of Case No. LUA2018-0036 / CPA2018-0001, a request for amendment to City of Liberty Lake Municipal Code § 10-4C-5 (A) & River District SAP 08-001 Development Regulations §10-4C-5(A), regarding bonding and assurances for required site improvements, the City of Liberty Lake Planning Commission recommends to City Council that the amendment be APPROVED, by a vote of 6-0, with one abstention. Ratified by the City of Liberty Lake Planning Commission on the 8th day of August, 2018. ___________________________________ Stan Jochim, Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 5 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0036 / CPA2018-0001  FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE MATTER OF CASE NO. LUA2018-0038 / CPA2018-0003, A REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT LIBERTY LAKE MUNICIPAL CODE § 10-2C-7, LOT AREA DIMENSIONS, COVERAGE & RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES, ELIMINATING MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM LOT AREAS IN THE R-2 ZONE HEARING DATE: July 11, 2018 @ 4:00 p.m. PROPOSAL SUMMARY: R-2 (Mixed Residential) Zone R-2 Zone Location Applicant(s) Greenstone Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 1 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0038 / CPA2018-0003  2018 Development Code Text Amendment Proposal Information LUA2018-0038 / CPA2018-0003 Code Chapter / Section Proposed Amendment Proposed Amendment to Table in Section 10-2C-7(C): Section 4.1 of River District SAP 08-001 Zoning Matrix (as amended by Ordinance 241) Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 2 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0038 / CPA2018-0003 STATE OF WASHINGTON REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, AUTHORITY & REQUIREMENTS: RCW 36.70A: Growth Management Act (GMA): Liberty Lake is mandated to plan under GMA. The City’s Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations were developed in accordance with the requirements of GMA. Development Regulations are required to implement the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and any amendments to City Development Code must be consistent with the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan. The City must provide reasonable public notice of proposed amendments and opportunities for public participation. WAC 365-196: Growth Management -- Procedural Criteria for Adopting Comprehensive Plans and Development Regulations Development code amendments must comply with procedures established in WAC 365-196, including rules regarding internal consistency, interjurisdictional coordination, public participation requirements, and notification to the Department of Commerce of “intent to adopt” proposed code amendments at least 60 days prior to final adoption. WAC 197-11: State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Rules: Development code amendments are subject to SEPA review as a non-project action, in accordance with procedures established in WAC 197-11. CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK & PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS: City Code §10-4B-5: Type IV Projects: Comprehensive Plan and Development Code Amendments are classified as Type IV Projects in the City of Liberty Lake Development Code and are considered legislative decisions. The procedural requirements and decision criteria are detailed in City Development Code §10-4B-5. SEPA REVIEW: SEPA Checklists were completed for the proposed Comprehensive Plan & Development Code Amendments. The City of Liberty Lake Planning & Building Services determined that the proposals, as non- project reviews, would have no significant adverse environmental impacts and issued a Determination of Non-significance (DNS) and Adoption of Existing Environmental Document on the 2018 Development Code Text Amendments on June 13, 2018. The City adopted the Spokane County Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan that was prepared on November 22, 2000 and was previously adopted for the original City of Liberty Lake Comprehensive Plan and Development Code, as well as the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Liberty Lake Urban Growth Area Boundary Alternatives that was prepared on December 13, 2006. The Notice of Availability, SEPA Checklist and Threshold Determination, and Amendment Lists were routed to agencies on June 11, 2018 and a Notice of Availability was posted at the Liberty Lake Municipal Library and at City Hall, as well as being published in the June 15, 2018 edition of the Valley News Herald. On June 13, 2018, the Notice of Availability, SEPA Checklist and Threshold Determination, and Amendment Lists were also posted on the City website, and the notice and a link to the City website was emailed to the public notice group, as well as the amendment applicants. Comments on the SEPA Checklist and Threshold Determination were due by 4 p.m., on June 26, 2018. No comments were received. Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 3 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0038 / CPA2018-0003 PROCEDURAL INFORMATION: March 30, 2018 Applications Received April 11, 2018 Planning Commission Workshop: Agenda & packet published on City website & distributed to City’s “Notify Me” e- mail distribution list May 9, 2018 Planning Commission Workshop: Agenda & packet published on City website & distributed to City’s “Notify Me” e- mail distribution list June 13, 2018 Planning Commission Workshop: Agenda & packet published on City website & distributed to City’s “Notify Me” e- mail distribution list June 13, 2018 SEPA Notice of Availability Issued: NOA packet with SEPA checklist and DNS e-mailed to involved agencies, adjacent jurisdictions, “Notify Me” e-mail distribution list & posted on website June 15, 2018 SEPA Notice of Availability: Published in Valley News Herald June 26, 2018 SEPA Comment Period Ends: SEPA appeal period begins June 27, 2018 Planning Commission Public Hearing Notice: Published on City website & distributed to City’s “Notify Me” e-mail distribution list June 29, 2018 Planning Commission Public Hearing Notice: Published in Valley News Herald July 11, 2018 Planning Commission Hearing & Recommendation: Agenda & staff report published on City website & distributed to City’s “Notify Me” e-mail distribution list on July 6th AGENCY REVIEW: SEPA Distribution List & Adjacent Jurisdictions: Liberty Lake Police Department; Avista; Century Link; Central Valley School District; City of Spokane Valley; CDA Tribe; Comcast; Spokane Clean Air; Spokane Valley Fire District; Spokane Transit Authority; Spokane Regional Health District; Spokane Tribe; WS Department of Ecology; S Department of Fish & Wildlife; WS Department of Natural Resources; WS Department of Transportation; Spokane Regional Transportation Council; Liberty Lake Water & Sewer District; Consolidated Irrigation District Spokane County Utilities; Spokane County Planning; WS Department of Commerce. Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 4 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0038 / CPA2018-0003 Agencies Notified Notification Comment Summary SEPA Distribution List & SEPA Notice of Availability; No comments received Adjacent Jurisdictions Proposed Amendment Summary; Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) Emailed 6/11/18 PUBLIC COMMENTS (WRITTEN): Name & Address Comment Summary N/A No comments received RELEVANT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOALS & POLICIES: Governance Policy 1: The City shall use the website, email, social media, newsletters, local newspapers, special announcements and other techniques to keep the community well-informed. Housing Goal 1: Preserve the character of existing neighborhoods and support high quality new development. Housing Goal 2: Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments, promote a variety of densities and housing types, and encourage the preservation of existing housing stock. Land Use Policy 1: Encourage developers to work with neighborhoods to develop plans that address neighborhood concerns, such as environmental protection, aesthetics, quality of life, property values, and preservation of open space. Housing Policy 2: Periodically assess the effects of policies and regulations on the affordability of housing, fair housing choice, and examine the need to reduce regulatory barriers. Housing Policy 3: When developing housing regulations, consider the balance between housing affordability and environmental quality, design quality, public resources, and maintenance of neighborhood character. STAFF ANALYSIS: The applicant indicates that this will provide greater flexibility in the R-2 zone, since currently, a smaller home on a narrow lot in that does not require a 5,000 sq. ft. lot is not allowed; and, conversely if a person wants to do a unique product with a detached type of garage on a lot greater than 10,000 sq. ft., that also is not permitted. Density and lot coverage provision, as well as setback requirements would still drive the number of units and overall intensity of development. The proposed amendment would apply to the Mission Villas Subdivision (south of Mission Avenue, and along E Maxwell Drive on the north side of I-90); Homestead –The Cottages PUD along E Maxwell Avenue on the south side of I-90); Meadowwood Village Phase II PUD (on the north side of E Valley Avenue); and, the undeveloped northern portion of Rock Hill North. Of those developments, both the Homestead – The Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 5 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0038 / CPA2018-0003 Cottages PUD and Meadowwood Villas Phase II are completely built-out, and Mission Villas Subdivision is largely built-out. Only Rock Hills North would likely be impacted by the amendment. FINDINGS: 1. The required SEPA review has been completed on the proposed amendment. 2. All public and agency notice requirements were met and accomplished in a timely manner. 3. The public was provided the opportunity for early and continuous participation. 4. The public had the opportunity to submit written comments and testify at a public hearing before the Planning Commission. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL: The criteria for approval of a code amendment are established in City Code §10-4B-5(A), which states: A. Criteria for Amendment: The City may amend development regulations when it finds that any of the following applies: 1. Such amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is not detrimental to the public welfare; 2. Change in economic, technological, or land use conditions has occurred to warrant modification; 3. It is found that an amendment is necessary to correct an error; 4. It is found that an amendment is necessary to clarify meaning or intent; 5. It is found that an amendment is necessary to provide for a use(s) that was not previously addressed; or 6. Those amendments as deemed necessary by the City Council as being in the public interest. DELIBERATIONS: In deliberations, Commissioner Siler indicated his only concern had been with regard to maximum lot size, but that concern was addressed by the requirement for development to comply with minimum and maximum density requirements, as established by the Comprehensive Plan, and explicitly required in development code. Commissioner Baird indicated that the proposal addresses the need for a variety of housing types, and meets Comprehensive Plan goals and policies. Commissioner Folyer concurred that it met all six relevant Comprehensive Plan goals. Chairman Jochim indicated that he was not concerned about maximum lot sizes, he was nervous about eliminating the minimum lot size, and felt that more study of the issue was warranted. CONCLUSIONS: In reviewing the application, the Planning Commission made the following conclusions in consideration of their recommendation: Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 6 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0038 / CPA2018-0003  1. The proposed amendment IS consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and IS NOT detrimental to the public welfare (one of seven Commissioner dissented with this conclusion). 2. The proposed amendment IS warranted by a change in economic, technological and/or land use conditions (three of seven Commissioners dissented with this conclusion). 3. The proposed amendment IS deemed necessary as being in the public interest (three of seven Commissioners dissented with this conclusion). RECOMMENDATION: In the matter of Case No. LUA2018-0038 / CPA2018-0003, a request for amendment Liberty Lake Municipal Code § 10-2C-7, Lot Area Dimensions, Coverage & Residential Densities, eliminating minimum and maximum lot areas in the R-2 Zone, the City of Liberty Lake Planning Commission recommends to City Council that the amendment be APPROVED, by a vote of 6-1. Ratified by the City of Liberty Lake Planning Commission on the 8th day of August, 2018. ___________________________________ Stan Jochim, Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 7 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0038 / CPA2018-0003  FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE MATTER OF CASE NO. LUA2018-0037 / CPA2018-0002, A REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO SECTION 4.1 OF RD-SAP 08-001, THE RIVER DISTRICT ZONING MATRIX, TO INCLUDE RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE AS AN ALLOWABLE USE IN THE RD-M (RIVER DISTRICT – NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER) ZONE. HEARING DATE: July 11, 2018 @ 4:00 p.m. PROPOSAL SUMMARY: River District-M (Neighborhood Center) Zone Location Applicant(s) Greenstone 2018 Development Code Text Amendment Proposal Information LUA2018-0037 / CPA2018-0002 Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 1 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0037 / CPA2018-0002 Code Chapter / Section Proposed Amendment Amend the River District Zoning Matrix to include Recreational Vehicle Storage as an allowable use in the RD-M (River District – Neighborhood Center) zone. Proposed Amendment: Section 4.1 of River District SAP 08-001 Zoning Matrix (as amended by Ordinance 241) STATE OF WASHINGTON REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, AUTHORITY & REQUIREMENTS: RCW 36.70A: Growth Management Act (GMA): Liberty Lake is mandated to plan under GMA. The City’s Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations were developed in accordance with the requirements of GMA. Development Regulations are required to implement the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and any amendments to City Development Code must be consistent with the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan. The City must provide reasonable public notice of proposed amendments and opportunities for public participation. WAC 365-196: Growth Management -- Procedural Criteria for Adopting Comprehensive Plans and Development Regulations Development code amendments must comply with procedures established in WAC 365-196, including rules regarding internal consistency, interjurisdictional coordination, public participation requirements, and notification to the Department of Commerce of “intent to adopt” proposed code amendments at least 60 days prior to final adoption. Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 2 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0037 / CPA2018-0002  WAC 197-11: State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Rules: Development code amendments are subject to SEPA review as a non-project action, in accordance with procedures established in WAC 197-11. CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK & PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS: City Code §10-4B-5: Type IV Projects: Comprehensive Plan and Development Code Amendments are classified as Type IV Projects in the City of Liberty Lake Development Code and are considered legislative decisions. The procedural requirements and decision criteria are detailed in City Development Code §10-4B-5. SEPA REVIEW: SEPA Checklists were completed for the proposed Comprehensive Plan & Development Code Amendments. The City of Liberty Lake Planning & Building Services determined that the proposals, as non- project reviews, would have no significant adverse environmental impacts and issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) and Adoption of Existing Environmental Document on the 2018 Development Code Text Amendments on June 13, 2018. The City adopted the Spokane County Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan that was prepared on November 22, 2000 and was previously adopted for the original City of Liberty Lake Comprehensive Plan and Development Code, as well as the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Liberty Lake Urban Growth Area Boundary Alternatives that was prepared on December 13, 2006. The Notice of Availability, SEPA Checklist and Threshold Determination, and Amendment Lists were routed to agencies on June 11, 2018 and a Notice of Availability was posted at the Liberty Lake Municipal Library and at City Hall, as well as being published in the June 15, 2018 edition of the Valley News Herald. On June 13, 2018, the Notice of Availability, SEPA Checklist and Threshold Determination, and Amendment Lists were also posted on the City website, and the notice and a link to the City website was emailed to the public notice group, as well as the amendment applicants. Comments on the SEPA Checklist and Threshold Determination were due by 4 p.m., on June 26, 2018. No comments were received. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION: March 30, 2018 Applications Received April 11, 2018 Planning Commission Workshop: Agenda & packet published on City website & distributed to City’s “Notify Me” e- mail distribution list May 9, 2018 Planning Commission Workshop: Agenda & packet published on City website & distributed to City’s “Notify Me” e- mail distribution list June 13, 2018 Planning Commission Workshop: Agenda & packet published on City website & distributed to City’s “Notify Me” e- mail distribution list June 13, 2018 SEPA Notice of Availability Issued: NOA packet with SEPA checklist and DNS e-mailed to involved agencies, adjacent jurisdictions, “Notify Me” e-mail distribution list & posted on website Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 3 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0037 / CPA2018-0002 June 15, 2018 SEPA Notice of Availability: Published in Valley News Herald June 26, 2018 SEPA Comment Period Ends SEPA appeal period begins June 27, 2018 Planning Commission Public Hearing Notice: Published on City website & distributed to City’s “Notify Me” e-mail distribution list June 29, 2018 Planning Commission Public Hearing Notice: Published in Valley News Herald July 11, 2018 Planning Commission Hearing & Recommendation: Agenda & staff report published on City website & distributed to City’s “Notify Me” e-mail distribution list on July 6th AGENCY REVIEW: SEPA Distribution List & Adjacent Jurisdictions: Liberty Lake Police Department; Avista; Century Link; Central Valley School District; City of Spokane Valley; CDA Tribe; Comcast; Spokane Clean Air; Spokane Valley Fire District; Spokane Transit Authority; Spokane Regional Health District; Spokane Tribe; WS Department of Ecology; S Department of Fish & Wildlife; WS Department of Natural Resources; WS Department of Transportation; Spokane Regional Transportation Council; Liberty Lake Water & Sewer District; Consolidated Irrigation District Spokane County Utilities; Spokane County Planning; WS Department of Commerce. Agencies Notified Notification Comment Summary SEPA Distribution List & SEPA Notice of Availability; No comments received Adjacent Jurisdictions Proposed Amendment Summary; Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) Emailed 6/11/18 PUBLIC COMMENTS (WRITTEN): Name & Address Comment Summary N/A No comments received RELEVANT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOALS & POLICIES: Governance Policy 1: The City shall use the website, email, social media, newsletters, local newspapers, special announcements and other techniques to keep the community well-informed. Housing Goal 1: Preserve the character of existing neighborhoods and support high quality new development. Land Use Policy 1: Encourage developers to work with neighborhoods to develop plans that address neighborhood concerns, such as environmental protection, aesthetics, quality of life, property values, and preservation of open space. Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 4 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0037 / CPA2018-0002 Urban Design Policy 1: Maintain design standards and a design review process to ensure that neighborhood and community centers are developed with minimal impact on surrounding land uses, are consistent with community character, and assure pedestrian and vehicular access. Urban Design Policy 19: Maintain design standards and land use plans for neighborhood centers, community centers, and the Central Business District that are based on the following principles: c. Unsightly views, such as heavy machinery, storage areas, loading docks, and parking areas, should be screened from the view of adjacent uses and from arterials. [relevant excerpt only] STAFF ANALYSIS: Currently, “outdoor vehicle storage” is not allowed in any zone within the River District. According to the applicant, they receive many requests for onsite RV storage so residents and non-residents do not have to travel to store and access their RVs. The applicant indicates that developed correctly with appropriate screening, any impacts to surrounding properties can be mitigated. The proposed amendment adds “Recreational Vehicle Storage” as a separate category within the matrix, thus distinguishing it from the category “vehicle storage”. Because the use is not currently allowed in any zone in the River District, no design or landscaping standards are provided for such uses in RD-SAP 08- 001. Screening and landscaping standards for this use have been added as a footnote to the River District Zoning Matrix, referencing Liberty Lake Municipal Code §10-3C-3(G), as detailed below: A. Screening of Mechanical Equipment, Outdoor Storage, and Loading Areas. All mechanical equipment, outdoor storage and manufacturing areas, and loading, service, and delivery areas, shall be screened from view from all public streets and any Residential Zones. Screening shall be provided by one or more of the following (minimum of 6 feet tall): 1. Decorative wall (i.e., masonry or similar quality material), 2. Evergreen hedge, 3. Sight-obscuring fence, or 4. Similar feature that provides a non-see through barrier. Walls, fences, and hedges shall comply with the vision clearance requirements (Section 10-3B-2, subsection N) and provide for pedestrian circulation, in accordance with Article 10-3B - Access and Circulation. (See Section 10-3C-5 for standards related to fences and walls.) It should be noted that recreational vehicles are generally taller than the minimum height of 6 feet. Alternately, the Planning Commission may want to consider a modification to the proposed amendment, listing this as a limited use (“L”) in the matrix, and proposing some additional design standards and limitations, which may include, but not limited to additional screening height requirements. FINDINGS: 1. The required SEPA review has been completed on the proposed amendment. 2. All public and agency notice requirements were met and accomplished in a timely manner. 3. The public was provided the opportunity for early and continuous participation. Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 5 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0037 / CPA2018-0002  4. The public had the opportunity to submit written comments and testify at a public hearing before the Planning Commission. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL: The criteria for approval of a code amendment are established in City Code §10-4B-5(A), which states: A. Criteria for Amendment: The City may amend development regulations when it finds that any of the following applies: 1. Such amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is not detrimental to the public welfare; 2. Change in economic, technological, or land use conditions has occurred to warrant modification; 3. It is found that an amendment is necessary to correct an error; 4. It is found that an amendment is necessary to clarify meaning or intent; 5. It is found that an amendment is necessary to provide for a use(s) that was not previously addressed; or 6. Those amendments as deemed necessary by the City Council as being in the public interest. DELIBERATIONS: In deliberations, Commissioner Siler stated that the proposal does not have any support in Comprehensive Plan Policy, nor does it provide any mechanism for addressing or enforcing on aesthetics. Commissioner Green indicated that, in his opinion, the proposal had the potential to generate “ill-will amongst neighbors”. Commissioner Matthews was concerned that the proposal would “grant special privilege to a small percentage of Liberty Lake residents”, and that there was sufficient supply of recreational vehicle storage within 10 minutes of Liberty Lake. He also expressed concerns that there was no limit on how large the recreational vehicle storage lots could be. Commissioner Baird indicated that she felt the proposal was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies, including that Housing Goal #1, which supports high quality, new development, could be addressed through additional design standards; that it was addressing neighborhood concerns, consistent with Land Use Policy #1; that Urban Design Policy # 1 could be addressed through additional design standards; that it was a new use, design standards should be developed, consistent with Urban Design Policy # 19. She also noted that the district was directly adjacent to a legal non-conforming storage facility. Commissioner Folyer indicated that he struggled with whether this was consistent with the Urban Design Policy related to consistency with community character, but indicated that this approval of the proposal would only be the start of a larger discussion regarding design standards. Chairman Jochim indicated that he was concerned about the potential number of units per site, and that it might better be considered as a limited use with design standards and appropriate screening regulations. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed amendment NOT consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and IS detrimental to the public welfare (two of seven Commissioners dissented with this conclusion). 2. The proposed amendment IS NOT warranted by a change in economic, technological and/or land use conditions. Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 6 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0037 / CPA2018-0002  3. The proposed amendment IS NOT necessary to correct an error. 4. The proposed amendment IS NOT necessary to clarify meaning or intent. 5. The proposed amendment IS necessary to provide for a proposed use that was not previously addressed (two of seven Commissioners dissented with this conclusion). 6. The proposed amendment IS NOT deemed necessary as being in the public interest (one of seven Commissioners dissented with this conclusion. RECOMMENDATION: In the matter of Case No. LUA2018-0037 / CPA2018-0002, a request for amendment to Section 4.1 of RDSAP 08-001, the River District Zoning Matrix, to include recreational vehicle storage as an allowable use in the RD-M (River District – Neighborhood Center) zone, the City of Liberty Lake Planning Commission recommends to City Council that the amendment be NOT APPROVED, by a vote of 6-1. Ratified by the City of Liberty Lake Planning Commission on the 8th day of August, 2018. ___________________________________ Stan Jochim, Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 7 2018 Development Code Text Amendment LUA2018-0037 / CPA2018-0002  Our Community Vision Liberty Lake is a safe, family‐friendly and engaged community. We are known for our great civic pride, quality recreational and educational opportunities, and abundant trails and green space. Our business environment supports a diverse, sustainable, and financially secure economic base. Vibrant Economy & Progressive Business Safe , Active & Engaged Community Environment Our Mission Serving with Integrity Partnering with Residents & Businesses Preserving Quality of Life, Economic Vitality & Sense of Community Sustainable Resources Quality Facilities & Infrastructure Our Values Integrity, Partnership, Civic Pride, Community Investment, Family‐Centered Activities, Quality of Life, Financial & Environmental Sustainability  Strategic Initiatives Vibrant Economy & Progressive Business Safe, Active & Engaged Community Environment GOALS: GOALS:  Progressive community engagement & information  Thriving Businesses exchange  Investment in Community  Lifelong activities & educational opportunities  Positive Partnerships through City services & partnerships  Diverse Economic Base  Proactive policing & public safety  Sustainable Revenue Stream  Connected & vibrant community  Equitable services Sustainable Resources Quality Facilities & Infrastructure GOALS: GOALS:  Diversified revenue stream  High quality city facilities that meet the needs of our  Fiscally prudent financial policies growing community  Strategic asset management  Efficient & effective operations & maintenance  Investin our employees  Financially‐sound capital investment for:  Focus on core services first: o Trails, parks & open space o Public health o Multi‐modal transportation network o Safety o Equipment o Welfare o Bridging I‐90 o Community priorities  Vibrant Economy & Progressive Business Environment ACTION PLAN STRATEGIES TASKS Business Recruitment & Expansion  Identify targeted business types o To diversify tax base o To address needed services in the marketplace o To attract visitors  Engage existing & potential new businesses, property owners & developers o Needs assessment o Relationship building o Provide opportunities for local businesses to connect with City Council  Promote business recruitment strategy with economic development partners o GSI o Inland Northwest Partners o Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce Advertising & Promotion of Liberty  Buy Liberty Lake Local Campaign Lake as a Great Place to do Business  Develop & maintain Cost of Doing Business comparison with neighboring jurisdictions (e.g. taxes, fees, permitting, utility costs, etc.)  City website, social media, brochures & annual report  Engage existing & potential new businesses  Cultivate economic development partnerships o GSI o Inland Northwest Partners o Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce Simplify Development Regulations &  Audit development code and procedures Streamline Permitting Processes  Identify opportunities to streamline application, review, and approval processes o Implement administrative changes as appropriate o Propose procedural code revisions, where necessary and appropriate  Identify opportunities to streamline and simply development regulations, where necessary and appropriate o Vet & prioritize code revisions with Plan Commission & City Council o Implement Code revisions  Safe, Active & Engaged Community ACTION PLAN STRATEGIES TASKS Provide Clean, Safe & Secure Parks &  Enhance & expand video surveillance Open Space  Increased police presence in parks & open space  Evaluate cost recovery fees for park reservations & events (e.g. refuse, clean up costs, staff support, etc.) Utilize Park Facilities to Maximize  Park programming including sports camps, day camps , recreational youth, and family Public Use & Sense of Community activities  Provide exceptional park facilities for reservation and public use  Provide City sponsored events providing opportunities for local business involvement  Provide events & activities co‐sponsored by local non‐profit organizations Communicate, Connect, & Engage  Social media with the Public  City website  Electronic message board(s) & information kiosks  Farmers market & other events  The Splash  Ongoing information maintenance Maintain & Expand Extensive Trail  Ongoing quality maintenance System to provide Connectivity &  Developer‐driven expansion of network Promote Active Lifestyle  Identify gaps in connectivity & opportunities for expanded interconnectivity  Identify funding strategies to address existing gaps Enrich & Enhance Intellectual, Cultural  Increase Library’s visibility & community use & Creative Opportunities through  Continuous improvement of technology resources available to community Liberty Lake Library Services  Increase programming and improve access for all age groups o educational classes o regular & special events  Increase teen opportunities through innovative programming, events and technology  Continue implementation of early literacy programming  Build community partnerships with local businesses, community groups & supporters  Sustainable Resources ACTION PLAN STRATEGIES TASKS Implement & Refine Asset  Ongoing needs assessment & evaluation Management Plan  Refine & formalize asset management policies  Identify & implement funding strategies Implement Asset Management  Develop funding stream for ongoing asset management Funding Strategy o Buildings ‐ Create maintenance schedule o Transportation Infrastructure – Maintain inventory of streets (pavement rating) o Equipment ‐ Update maintenance and replacement schedules  Provide contingency funding for emergency repairs  Implement, evaluate and adjust ongoing funding strategy as needed for maintenance, repair and replacement Develop Financial Management Plan  Continue to implement policies  Evaluate & update financial software? Invest in Employees  Maintain a collaborative and supportive work environment  Provide a competitive compensation package  Invest in employee training that: o Promotes professional growth & development o Improves productivity o Maximize services provided by existing work force Quality Facilities & Infrastructure ACTION PLAN STRATEGIES TASKS Develop Capital Facilities Improvement  Prioritize Projects Plan  Develop Project Master Plans, as needed  Prepare Cost Estimates & Phasing Plans  Identify Potential Funding Sources  Develop Schedule for Design & Construction