City Planning Commission
Regular MeetingLiberty Lake, WA · April 10, 2024
Minutes
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 10, 2024
HELD VIA ZOOM & IN PERSON AT CITY HALL
Planning Commission Members Present: Joe Mann, Tom Sahlberg, Jim Baumker, DG Garcia
(via ZOOM), Charlie Jencks, and Phil Folyer
Adjunct Member(s) Present: Gene Heuschel and Troy Mullenix
Staff Present: Amy Mullerleile, Lance Mueller and Kathy Cummings
Call to Order: Meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m.
Roll Call: A quorum of members was present.
Unexcused absence: Dale Robbins
Review of Agenda & Approval of Minutes:
Commissioner Jencks motioned to approve the agenda, seconded by Commissioner Sahlberg.
The motion carried unanimously.
Commissioner Jencks motioned to approve the March 13, 2024, Planning Commission meeting
minutes, seconded by Commissioner Baumker. The minutes were approved unanimously.
Workshops:
Spokane Transit Authority Strategic Plan:
Brian Jennings, Deputy Director of Community Development for the Spokane Transit Authority
(STA), presented an overview of STA’s upcoming 10-year strategic plan called Connect 2035.
He provided the phases of Connect 2035 and the goals for each phase. These goals, along with
Facilities Master Plan will assist in developing what additional investments, services and capital
investments will need to be made. STA proposes to have Final Plan Development by December
2024.
Questions regarding the strategic plan development were asked by the Planning Commission and
answered accordingly.
Proposed Lighting Code Amendments:
Scott Wetterling, the Director of Development for Topgolf, gave a presentation and thorough
overview of Topgolf, which included the amenities and facility characteristics. Topgolf is
interested in locating a venue within the City of Liberty Lake but due to the current outdoor lighting
standards within the City’s Development Code and the River District’s Development Code,
amendments will need to be made. Topgolf submitted a code amendment application on March
29, 2024. This proposed amendment will impact M-1, M-2, C-1, C-2, I, RD-C and RD-M zones.
All agreed that further discussion will be necessary. Commissioner Baumker requested that a
zoning map be prepared that delineates the possible locations of impact.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 1|2
April 10, 2024
Citizens Comments:
None
Secretary’s Report:
Senior Planner, Amy Mullerleile, reported updates in Director Key’s absence. The first was letting
the Planning Commission know that the city’s new recreation coordinator has reviewed and made
changes to the community event application, and it will soon be available online for the public.
The second update was that the city has received a proposal from a sign code consultant. Lastly,
the Planning Commissioner’s mailboxes have been moved to the front desk of City Hall for easier
access.
Commissioner Report:
No reports at this time.
Adjournment:
Commissioner Jencks motioned to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Commissioner Folyer. The
motion carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 5:40 p.m.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 2|2
April 10, 2024
Agenda
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 10, 2024
4 P.M.
CITY HALL
HELD REMOTELY& IN-PERSON AT CITY HALL
To participate remotely, you can:
• Sign up to provide Public Comment at the meeting via calling in
• Submit Written Public Comment Prior to 2 pm on April 10, 2024
• Join the Zoom Meeting
Questions or Need Assistance? Please contact Planning Commission Clerk Kathy Cummings at
kcummings@libertylakewa.gov .
1. Call to Order – 4:00 pm
2. Roll Call
3. GENERAL BUSINESS
• Review of Agenda
• Approval of Minutes from March 13, 2024
4. WORKSHOPS:
• Spokane Transit Authority Strategic Plan – Brian Jennings
• Proposed Lighting Code Amendments – Scott Wetterling
5. CITIZEN COMMENTS
6. REPORTS
• Secretary’s Report
• Planning Commissioner Reports
7. Adjournment
Next Meeting: May 8, 2024
PUBLIC COMMENT
If you wish to provide oral public comments or testimony during the Planning Commission
meeting, please register through this link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/s/86818958997
WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS
If you wish to provide written public comments for the upcoming council meeting, please
email your comments to kcummings@libertylakewa.gov by 2:00 p.m. the day of the
Planning Commission meeting and include all of the following information with your
comments:
1. The Meeting Date
2. Your First and Last Name
3. If you are a Liberty Lake resident
4. The Agenda Item(s) which you are speaking about
JOIN ZOOM MEETING
To view the meeting live via Zoom Meeting, join the Zoom web meeting:
Meeting Instructions:
To join the Zoom web meeting:
https://us02web.zoom.us/s/86818958997
Dial In Phone Numbers:
• +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
• +1 253 205 0468 US
Meeting ID: 868 1895 8997
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 13TH, 2024
HELD VIA ZOOM & IN PERSON AT CITY HALL
Planning Commission Members Present: Joe Mann, Tom Sahlberg, Jim Baumker, DG Garcia,
Charlie Jencks, Phil Folyer, and Dale Robbins
Adjunct Member(s) Present: Gene Heuschel and Troy Mullenix
Staff Present: Lisa Key, Amy Mullerleile, Lance Mueller and Kathy Cummings
Call to Order: Meeting was called to order at 4:35 p.m. due to technical difficulties with Zoom.
Roll Call: A quorum of members was present.
Director Key introduced the new Associate Planner, Lance Mueller. Lance provided a brief
introductory speech on his professional background and previous work experience.
Review of Agenda & Approval of Minutes:
Commissioner Jencks motioned to approve the agenda, seconded by Commissioner Robbins.
The motion carried unanimously.
Commissioner Jencks motioned to approve the February 14, 2024, Planning Commission
meeting minutes, seconded by Commissioner Garcia. The minutes were approved unanimously.
Workshops:
Preliminary Periodic Comprehensive Plan Update Work Program:
Director Key presented an overview of the work program she created outlining each of the
mandatory elements of the comprehensive plan update, the tasks, the timelines in which these
need to be completed and the methodology that will be used. She explained that Spokane
County’s process can change the City’s timelines. The overview also included an explanation of
the adoption process and the coordinated involvement with other outside agencies.
Questions regarding the process were asked by the Planning Commission and answered
accordingly.
Proposed Amendment for Fueling Stations as an Accessory Use:
Commissioner Baumker motioned that this proposed amendment item be moved to the May
meeting due to the late start from technical difficulties that occurred at the beginning of the
meeting. Commissioner Garcia seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.
Citizens Comments: None
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 1|2
March 13, 2024
Commissioner Heuschel commended Director Key on how well she synthesized the complex
work program with the document she created. Director Key thanked him.
Secretary’s Report:
Director Key will send an invitation to watch the (SCEO) Steering Committee of Elected Officials
meeting that is happening on Wednesday, March 20, 2024, and will include the link for the
Washington State Department of Commerce website to the Commissioners.
At the next Planning Commission meeting, Senior Planner, Amy Mullerleile, will be discussing our
population projection, the analysis methodology and a very preliminary analysis on the housing
projections for the city.
Director Key is on the agenda to present this work program at the April 16, 2024, City Council
meeting and would encourage the Commissioners to attend if available.
Commissioner Report:
Commissioner Mann had recently sat in on an Eastern Washington Planning Seminar and learned
about the water bank and aquifer availability within Stevens County. This included information on
water resource inventory areas (WRIAs) within Washington state and how all the counties will be
required to analyze their water resources. The second portion of this seminar discussed laws
that currently affect middle class housing, one of which pertains to parking. One of the upcoming
laws will address more on-street parking for middle class housing. He highly recommends going
to the WA State Department of Commerce website and signing up to receive emails for the
different subjects that planning departments statewide are having to act upon.
Adjournment:
Commissioner Jencks motioned to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Commissioner Robbins.
The motion carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 6:06 p.m.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 2|2
March 13, 2024
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT REQUEST
Liberty Lake Planning & Building Services
22710 E. Country Vista Drive, Liberty Lake WA 99019
Phone: (509) 755-6707 Fax: (509) 755 6713
Website: www.libertylakewa.gov
PLEASE CHECK APPLICABLE AMENDMENT REQUEST (submit 1 application per request)
□ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT
□ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT
□ DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT / ZONING MATRIX AMENDMENT
□ ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
NOTE: A DEVELOPMENT CODE / ZONING MAP AMENDMENT MAY BE REQUIRED CONCURRENT
WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP / TEXT AMENDMENT REQUEST IN ORDER TO KEEP THE
DOCUMENTS CONSISTENT. CONSULT PLANNING & BUILDING SERVICES FOR MORE INFORMATION.
ADDITIONALLY, A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL OF THIS
APPLICATION. TO SCHEDULE A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE, PLEASE CONTACT PLANNING &
BUILDING SERVICES.
Planning is an ongoing process, and improved data or changing circumstances will require amendment to the
comprehensive plan or development regulations. Amendments to the comprehensive plan or development
regulations can be requested by the City Council, Planning Commission, City Staff, or by any affected citizen
on a yearly basis. Yearly review of proposed amendments shall begin in April and should conclude in
December. Complete applications for amendments shall be submitted by 4pm on April 1st of each year
in order for the amendment to be reviewed that year. Applications for amendments submitted after 4pm on
April 1st or incomplete applications shall be reviewed the following year. Refer to City Development Code
Section 10-4B-5 (Type IV Projects) for additional information.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT / LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT:
Proposed amendments to the City of Liberty Lake Comprehensive Plan will initially be reviewed by the
Planning Commission. A public workshop and a public hearing will be held, and the Planning Commission will
make a recommendation of approval or denial to the City Council. The City Council will approve or deny the
proposed amendment after an additional public workshop and public hearing. Comprehensive Plan
amendments can only be considered once each calendar year; City Staff, the Planning Commission, and the
City Council must consider all of the proposed amendments for the year concurrently in order to assess their
cumulative impact. A Development Code / Zoning Map Amendment may also be required concurrent with a
Comprehensive Plan Map / Text Amendment request in order to keep the documents consistent.
DEVELOPMENT CODE / ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS:
The annual deadline for submittal of requests for Development Code Amendments is 4pm on April 1st.
Proposed amendments to the Development Code, the Zoning Map, and the Zoning Matrix are reviewed once a
year during the Comprehensive Plan annual review period in order to keep the documents consistent.
3/6/13 Page 1 of 10
The Planning Commission will review amendment requests and prepare a recommendation of approval
or denial to the City Council based on the following criteria. Amendments will only be granted if the
City Council determines that the request is consistent with the following criteria. Applicants must
address each of the following standards and criteria in a written response that shall be attached to this
amendment request application:
1. The amendment will not result in development that will adversely affect the public health, safety, and
general welfare.
2. The amendment is based on new information that was not available at the time of adoption of the
Comprehensive Plan / Development Code, or that circumstances have changed since the adoption of
the Comprehensive Plan / Development Code that warrant an amendment.
3. The amendment is consistent with other goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, and that the
amendment will maintain concurrency between the Land Use, Transportation, and Capital Facilities
Elements of the Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Code sections.
To address the above criteria, consider and discuss the following questions:
What is the public benefit, necessity and/or convenience that requires this amendment?
What significance will the proposed amendment have to the community?
What effect will the proposed amendment have on other elements of the Comprehensive Plan or
Development Code sections?
What effect will the proposed amendment have on public funding? Will approval or denial of the
proposed amendment cause public funds to be expended?
Will approval of the proposed amendment require expansion of infrastructure for transportation,
utilities and/or other essential public services and facilities?
What effect will the proposed amendment have on related ordinances, regulations, and development
standards?
What impact will the proposed amendment have on:
a) The health, safety and general welfare of the public;
b) The City design and aesthetics;
c) Development interests;
d) Neighborhoods;
e) Environmentally sensitive areas.
3/6/13 Page 2 of 10
APPLICATION - PART 1
ANSWER THE FOLLOWING, AS APPLICABLE (ANSWER N/A IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS AMENDMENT REQUEST)
APPLICANT 1:
Name: Frontera Acquisitions, LLC Contact Person: Jay Schneider
Mailing Address: 2850 E Camelback Rd., Suite 180 Phone: 602-524-5495
City/State/Zip: Phoenix, AZ 85016 Fax Number:
Signature: E-mail: jay@fronteradevelopment.com
APPLICANT 2:
Name: ARCO/Murray National Construction Company Co., Inc Contact Person: Jose Pazmino
Mailing Address: 3110 Woodcreek Dr. Phone: 331-703-0077
City/State/Zip: Downers Grove, IL 60515 Fax Number:
Signature: E-mail: jpazmino@arcomurray.com
AGENT/ CONSULTANT/ ATTORNEY: (mandatory if primary contact is different from applicant or property owner)
Name: Kutak Rock LLP Contact Person: Nathan G. Smith
Mailing Address: 510 W Riverside Avenue, Suite 800 Phone: 509.747.4040
City/State/Zip: Spokane, WA 99201 Fax Number:
s/ Nathan G. Smith
Signature: E-mail: nathan.smith@kutakrock.com
PROPERTY OWNER:
Name: Contact Person:
Mailing Address: Phone:
City/State/Zip: Fax Number:
Signature: E-mail:
PROPERTY OWNER 2 : (if more than two property owners attach additional info/signature sheets)
Name: Contact Person:
Mailing Address: Phone:
City/State/Zip: Fax Number:
Signature: E-mail:
The above signed property owners certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of our knowledge and under penalty of
perjury, each state that we are all of the legal owners of the property described above and designate the above listed
agent/consultant/attorney to act as our agent with respect to this application.
3/6/13 Page 3 of 10
Comprehensive Plan & Development Code Text Amendment -
Which goals and policies of the Liberty Lake Comprehensive Plan are you requesting to be amended or
added? List the applicable element(s) and text sections for which an amendment is being sought. Please
include the element number(s), specific sections of the text and page number(s).
Sections 10-3F-2 (D)(1), 10-3F-2 (G), 10-3F-2 (I), & 10-3F-2 (J)(1). In addition, this would also be an amendment to the
River District Development Regulations to include the RD-C and RD-M zones.
Comprehensive Plan & Development Code Text Amendment -
What do you want to change about the Comprehensive Plan / Development Code and why? Discuss the
reason or rationale for the proposed text amendment.
The amendment is requested to accommodate a unique use that was not an available land development option at the
time the lighting requirements of the Development Code was last amended. Specifically, the amendment would allow for
the construction and operation of a Topgolf facility in Liberty Lake. Please refer to the amendment narrative provided under
a separate cover for additional details.
Comprehensive Plan & Development Code Text Amendment -
What specific language revisions to the Comprehensive Plan / Development Code text are you requesting?
Please refer to redline included herein with proposed language for code amendment.
3/6/13 Page 4 of 10
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map & Zoning Map Amendments - N/A; Map Amendment not requested
Site Address / Location:
Parcel Number(s) of Project / Proposal:
Legal Description of Project / Proposal:
Section Township Range Source of Legal Description:
Parcel Size(s):
Adjacent Area Owned or Controlled (acres or sq. ft.):
Parcel Number(s) of Adjacent Area:
Description of Proposal:
Current Requested
Designation Designation
Land Use Map:
Zoning Map:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Single Family Dwellings □ Duplexes □ Multifamily Dwellings □
Manufactured Homes □ Commercial □ Industrial □ Mixed Use □
Other □ (describe):
Reason or Rationale for the Proposed Amendment / Reclassification:
3/6/13 Page 5 of 10
What Factors Support the Proposal?
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan:
Compliance with the Purpose and Intent of the Zoning:
School District: Fire District:
Sewer Purveyor: Water Purveyor:
List Previous Planning Actions Involving Subject Property:
Name of Public Road(s) Providing Access:
Width of Property Fronting on Public Road:
Does the Proposal Have Access to an Arterial or Planned Arterial: □ YES □ NO
Name of Arterial Road(s):
If You Do Not Hold Title to the Property, What is Your Interest In It?
What Impacts Will the Proposed Amendment / Reclassification Have on the Adjacent Properties?
What Measures Do You Propose to Mitigate Your Proposal's Impact on Surrounding Land Use?
3/6/13 Page 6 of 10
APPLICATION - PART 2
THE ITEMS BELOW MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATION, AS APPLICABLE:
□ APPLICATION FORM & FEES
Submit completed application on the attached form with all signature blocks completed and non-refundable
application fees and associated environmental fees (contact Planning & Building Services for a copy of the
current fee schedule). Acceptance of the application and fees does not guarantee approval of the amendment).
□ AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES
□ WRITTEN RESPONSE TO STANDARDS & CRITERIA FOR AMENDMENTS (see Page 2 of 10 above)
□ ASSESSOR'S SECTION MAPS (MAP AMENDMENTS ONLY)
Submit 1 copy of current County Assessor maps showing the subject property outlined in red and adjacent
property owned or under option to the owner or sponsor (indicate adjacent property with a red dashed line).
Adjacent includes property located across roads and rivers, etc.
Assessor maps are available at the County Assessor’s Office and must be current (less than 30 days old) at the
time of submittal and stamped by a licensed land surveyor. Platted (1"=200’) and range (1”=400’) parcel maps
must be obtained, as you may need both sets, depending on your property location. The maps are used for legal
notification of property owners within 400 feet of the boundary of the total contiguous ownership and/or controlled
property (shown in red). Label and show in red line the 400 foot boundary from the total contiguous ownership.
Note: The property does not have to be surveyed at this time. The map stamped by a licensed land surveyor
verifies the written legal description for the proposed zone change is an approximate representation on the map.
□ ZONING SECTION MAP (MAP AMENDMENTS ONLY)
Submit 1 copy of the official zoning map with the boundary of the proposed zone change(s) indicated in red, with
the proposed zoning labeled on the property. The zoning boundary shall be stamped by a licensed land surveyor.
Copies of official zoning maps are obtainable from the City of Liberty Lake. (The written legal description(s) on the
application form and the zoning boundary(s) shown on the map shall coincide).
Note: The property does not have to be surveyed at this time. The map stamped by a licensed land
surveyor verifies the written legal description for the proposed zone change is an approximate representation on
the zoning map.
□ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Submittal forthcoming at a later date.
□ CERTIFICATE OF WATER & SEWER AVAILABILITY (MAP AMENDMENTS ONLY)
Submit 1 copy of a signed certificate of water availability from the water purveyor and 1 copy of a letter from the
sewer purveyor discussing how sewer will be provided to the site (size of lines and improvements required to
connect) and whether the required improvements are in conformance with the approved sewer comprehensive
plan or an amendment to the sewer comprehensive plan is required.
□ ZONING PLAN AND / OR SITE PLAN (MAP AMENDMENTS ONLY, IF APPLICABLE)
Submit 1 hard copy of the development proposal zoning plan / site plan drawn to scale and 1 .pdf (on CD)
indicating the following information in a clear and concise manner:
a. Scale of drawing; north arrow; dimensions of the site boundaries and area in square feet or acres;
corporation, firm, or individual preparing the site plan – with the date; and a small vicinity map.
b. The following data in table form on the site plan:
3/6/13 Page 7 of 10
Existing Zone(s) Proposed Zone(s) Acres or Sq. Ft.
Building Information:
Percent of Building Coverage (in sq. ft.)
Building Use(s)
Landscaped Areas (in sq. ft.)
Type of Landscaping
No. of Parking Spaces Required
Percent of Open Space (exclude paved areas) (in sq. ft.)
Building Setbacks
c. Indicate the following:
1. Indicate right of way width and names of streets adjacent to the site.
2. Existing buildings and other improvements; indicate which ones are to remain, which ones are to be
removed.
3. Proposed buildings and dimensions.
4. Height of all buildings, structures, and signs.
5. Access points and driveways.
6. Proposed or existing easements providing access to the site.
7. Interior circulation patterns.
8. Parking areas and spaces.
9. Building setbacks to property lines, and to center line of adjacent private and public roads.
10. Type and location of landscaping, fencing, lighting, and signage.
□ REQUIRED PUBLIC NOTICE - Planning & Building Services staff will provide you with the preparation
instructions at the Pre-Application Conference
□ OTHER EXHIBITS OR APPLICATIONS
-Amendment narrative.
-Redline with proposed language for code amendment.
3/6/13 Page 8 of 10
APPLICATION - PART 3
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION REQUESTED.
THE MAP / SITE PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE ZONING / SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND THE LAWS OF
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON.
PRINTED NAME: _____________________________ PHONE: ____________
ADDRESS: ____________________________
CITY: STATE: ZIP: _______________
SIGNATURE OF SURVEYOR DATE
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE
MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE
OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF
NOT THE OWNER. ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY
ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF.
PRINTED NAME: Jay Schneider
_____________________________ PHONE: ____________
602-524-5495
ADDRESS: 2850 E Camelback
____________________________
Rd., Suite 180
CITY: Phoenix STATE: AZ ZIP: 85016
_______________
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE
NOTE: APPLICANT NOT AN OWNER WITHIN THE CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS:
CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE )
Notary: Signed and sworn to before me this day of , 20
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Residing at:
My Appointment Expires:
THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING MATERIAL REQUIRED BY THE CITY MUST BE
SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION IN ORDER FOR THE APPLICATION TO BE COMPLETE.
3/6/13 Page 9 of 10
(PLANNING & BUILDING SERVICES OFFICE USE ONLY)
DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY:
DATE COMPLETE: FILE NUMBER:
TOTAL FEES: RECEIPT NUMBER:
AMENDMENT INITIATED BY:
Citizen Planning Commission City Council City
Staff
Other:
3/6/13 Page 10 of 10
Jose Pazmino
ARCO/Murray National Construction co, Inc.
3110 Woodcreek Dr.
Downers Grove, IL 60515.
3/29/2024
Lisa D. Key
Director of Planning & Engineering
Liberty Lake Planning & Building Services
22710 E Country Vista Drive
Liberty Lake, WA 99019
Proposed Code Amendment for Exterior Lighting Standards of Commercial Outdoor
Recreation Uses
Dear Lisa,
Please find a narrative below to address the standards and criteria outlined in the Development Code
Amendment Request Application.
I. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Frontera Acquisitions, LLC and its affiliates (collectively, “Frontera”) is a prospective purchaser of
undeveloped real property located within the City of Liberty Lake. Frontera is a commercial real
estate developer and brokerage company that focuses primarily on retail developments. The
company is headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona but has a broad geographical presence across
the western United States. Frontera works with landowners and Cities on annexations, rezoning,
and entitlements in the course of its commercial development transactions, and often works with
local engineers, zoning attorneys and facilitators to complete developments.
II. NARRATIVE AMENDMENT STANDARDS AND CRITERIA RESPONSES
The Planning Commission will review amendment requests and prepare a
recommendation of approval or denial to the City Council based on the following criteria.
Amendments will only be granted if the City Council determines that the request is
consistent with the following criteria. Applicants must address each of the following
standards and criteria in a written response that shall be attached to this amendment
request application:
1. The amendment will not result in development that will adversely affect the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The amendment is designed to minimize potential off-site lighting impacts and to enhance
commercial development in accordance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
2. The amendment is based on new information that was not available at the time of adoption of
the Comprehensive Plan / Development Code, or that circumstances have changed since the
adoption of the Comprehensive Plan / Development Code that warrant an amendment.
OFFICE FAX WWW.ARCOMURRAY.COM
The amendment is requested to accommodate a unique use that was not an available land
development option at the time the lighting requirements of the Development Code were last
amended. Specifically, the amendment would allow for the construction and operation of a
Topgolf facility in Liberty Lake. Since Topgolf designed and built the first prototype in 2011,
Topgolf has grown to nearly 100 units across the globe. Over this most recent 13-year period,
Topgolf has developed new prototypes to serve major and medium markets. Presently,
Topgolf has over 20 of its 100 units in many medium sized markets which are of similar size to
Spokane-Coeur d'Alene MSA such as Albuquerque NM, Omaha NE, Boise ID, Knoxville TN,
and Charleston SC.
3. The amendment is consistent with other goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, and
that the amendment will maintain concurrency between the Land Use, Transportation, and
Capital Facilities Elements of the Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Code sections.
The City adopted Urban Design Policy 14 to protect its night sky. The amendment is
intended to adhere to the purpose of the City’s Comprehensive Plan by encouraging lighting
restrictions that preserve the value of the City’s night sky. The modifications to Section 10-
3F-2 of the City’s Development Code are designed to curtail the degradation of the nighttime
visual environment and control skyglow, glare and light trespass, while still promoting
commercial development in furtherance of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. These
modifications are designed to ensure that there remains land use compatibility between
various zoning classifications and property owners.
The amendment would accommodate the development of a Topgolf facility in the City which
would support one of the City’s chief goals of enhancing quality of life among the community
by promoting recreational opportunities, as stated in the Vision Statement of the City’s
Comprehensive Plan. A commercial outdoor recreation facility operating year-round would
be an ideal combination of commercial and recreational use, which is a planning principal for
economic development in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The facility would not only provide
a commercial entertainment development within the City that is designed to draw customers
to the City from outlying areas along the I-90 corridor, but it would also align with the City’s
existing open space and recreational uses which emphasize outdoor activities and the
scenery surrounding Liberty Lake. The golf courses currently located in and operated by the
City would be enhanced by a commercial outdoor recreation facility located in the City. The
facility would likely draw new golfers which would likely increase existing use of the golf
courses operated by the City.
The City’s Comprehensive Plan also acknowledges that recreational and scenic opportunities
around Liberty Lake make tourism an excellent source for employment, as the City has or is
within easy driving distance to outdoor activities for visitors such as lakes, golf, scenic
mountains and trail systems. A commercial outdoor recreation facility would provide yet
another outdoor activity drawing visitors to the City. It would provide visitors with year-round
accessibility to an outdoor golf facility, which is not currently available in the City.
Furthermore, the amendment will only apply to outdoor recreational facilities associated with
a commercial use in limited zones, which generally are only economically feasible with
respect to relatively large commercial developments, such as a commercial outdoor
recreation facility, located on large parcels of real estate. Given the scarcity of large parcels
PAGE 2 OFFICE WWW.ARCOMURRAY.COM
of undeveloped real estate available in the City, it is highly unlikely that the amendment would
even apply to enough commercial outdoor recreational facilities associated with a commercial
use to cause any degradation of the dark sky of the City.
A Topgolf venue in the Spokane-Coeur d'Alene MSA may generate:
a $25MM+ construction project
$20-$24MM in tax revenue (sales and property taxes)
+/- 150 jobs created during construction
+/- 250 jobs at the Topgolf venue at a competitive wage and offering significant benefits
(healthcare and 401K plans)
+/- $14-17M projected annual sales venue projection
+/- 250,000 visitors estimated annually
Topgolf also delivers a commitment to the communities they operate in. Topgolf’s Driving for
Good defines its global giving, responsible business practices, and supporting local
communities through charitable events, donations and volunteering. A key element of the
Topgolf Driving for Good platform is “Youth Play It Forward” – a program which offers free
bay usage to area golf teams and youth organizations.
The successful openings of Topgolf venues in the Pacific NW region (Hillsboro, OR and
Renton, WA) provided Topgolf with the confidence to expand its reach in the Pacific NW.
The Pacific NW area’s enjoyment of the outdoors and celebration of sport are big factors
behind Topgolf interest to Liberty Lake. Liberty Lake is an excellent midpoint to draw in the
entire Spokane-Coeur d'Alene MSA. Topgolf’s proposed venue in Liberty Lake will have over
70 climatized bays for year-round enjoyment.
With the concentration of golf in the Liberty Lake area, Topgolf will bolster Liberty Lake as the
place to not only enjoy golf, but to introduce and learn the game of golf. This is supported by
studies performed by the National Golf Federation which credits Topgolf with growing the
game of golf by introducing golf in a fun and casual environment.
Below is a breakdown of visitors to Topgolf locations:
8% are avid green grass golfers
14% are moderate green grass golfers
27% are occasional green grass golfers
51% are non-golfers
To address the above criteria, consider and discuss the following questions:
What is the public benefit, necessity and/or convenience that requires this amendment?
See response to question #3 above.
PAGE 3 OFFICE WWW.ARCOMURRAY.COM
What significance will the proposed amendment have to the community?
See response to question #3 above.
What effect will the proposed amendment have on other elements of the Comprehensive
Plan or Development Code sections?
The amendment will be limited to commercial outdoor recreational facilities. The
amendment will implement Urban Design Policy 14 of the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
What effect will the proposed amendment have on public funding? Will approval or
denial of the proposed amendment cause public funds to be expended?
None.
Will approval of the proposed amendment require expansion of infrastructure for
transportation, utilities and/or other essential public services and facilities?
Strictly with respect to the amendment, no expansion of infrastructure for transportation,
utilities and/or other essential public services and facilities will be required. The
amendment is a threshold matter that would first need to be adopted before any possible
infrastructure expansions can occur. Only with the amendment already in place will a
development proceed to the stage of permitting and development review by the City, at
which time the City would analyze any possible expansion of infrastructure for
transportation, utilities and/or other essential public services and facilities.
What effect will the proposed amendment have on related ordinances, regulations, and
development standards?
The amendment will be limited to outdoor recreational facilities associated with a commercial
use. It will be limited to a modification to Section 10-3F-2.
What impact will the proposed amendment have on:
a) The health, safety and general welfare of the public
See response to question #1 above.
a) The City design and aesthetics
The amendment will provide an exception that will create lighting only for outdoor
recreational facilities associated with a commercial use, which such lighting will be no
brighter than the existing Ridgeline High School athletic stadium. Specific to the
Topgolf facility, Qualite (the lighting fixture manufacturer) conducted a study and
determined the following:
The Topgolf facility would emit 7.8% of the light that Ridgeline High School is
emitting.
The Topgolf facility would consume 7.8% of the energy that Ridgeline High
School is consuming.
PAGE 4 OFFICE WWW.ARCOMURRAY.COM
The Topgolf facility will control spill light at a 0.1 footcandle intensity better
than Ridgeline High School by 130 feet.
Please see below for a comparison table between Topgolf and the previously
approved Ridgeline High School athletic stadium.
Ridgeline High
Topgolf Facility
School
No. of Fixtures 15 77
Individual Fixture Wattage 520 W 1,300 W
Total System Wattage 7.8 kW 100.1 kW
Individual Fixture Lumen
48,0000 120,000
Output
Total System Lumen
720,000 9,240,000
Output
0.1 Footcandle Max.
385 feet 515 feet
Distance from Lighted Area
Underside of Mounted on Steel
Fixture Location Canopy; Max Poles; Max Height
Height of 27 feet. of 90 feet
Qualite Qualite
Fixture Type
GameChanger LED GameChanger LED
b) Development interests
See response to question #3 above.
c) Neighborhoods
None.
d) Environmentally sensitive areas
None.
PAGE 5 OFFICE WWW.ARCOMURRAY.COM
If you should have any questions or comments regarding this application, please do not hesitate to contact
me. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Jose Pazmino
Project Developer
jpazmino@arcomurray.com
PAGE 6 OFFICE WWW.ARCOMURRAY.COM
10-3F-2 Lighting
A. Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to provide regulations that preserve and enhance the
view of the dark sky; promote health, safety, security, and productivity; and help protect natural
resources. The provisions of this Section are intended to control skyglow, glare and light
trespass. It is the intent of this Section to provide standards for appropriate lighting practices
and systems that will enable people to see essential detail in order that they may undertake
their activities at night, facilitate safety and security of persons and property, and curtail the
degradation of the nighttime visual environment.
B. Applicability.
1. All outdoor lighting fixtures installed on private and public property shall comply with this
Section. This Section does not apply to interior lighting; provided, that if it is determined
by the Zoning Administrator that any interior lighting emitting light outside of the building
or structure in which it is located creates a light trespass, the interior lighting shall be
subject to the requirements of this Section. Lighting shall also comply with the Non-
Residential Energy Code (NREC), as applicable.
2. In the event of a conflict between the requirements of this Section and any other
requirement of the City of Liberty Lake Municipal Code the more specific requirement
shall apply.
3. Exterior lighting plans, photometric calculations and photometry plan as noted and
fixture specification sheets (cut sheets) must be supplied to the City to review for
compliance with this Section.
C. Exemptions. The following are exempt from the provisions of this Section provided that they
have no glare or other detrimental effects on adjoining streets or property owners:
1. Traffic control signals and devices;
2. Temporary emergency lighting (i.e., fire, police, repair workers) or warning lights;
3. Moving vehicle lights;
4. Navigation lights (i.e., radio/television towers, docks, piers, buoys) or any other lights
where state or federal statute or other provision of the City of Liberty Lake Municipal
Code requires lighting that cannot comply with this Section. In such situations, lighting
shall be shielded to the maximum extent possible, and lumens shall be minimized to the
maximum extent possible, while still complying with state or federal statute;
5. Outdoor lighting approved by the Zoning Administrator for temporary or periodic events
(e.g., fairs, nighttime construction);
6. Internally illuminated signs and searchlights permitted under the City Signage
Standards (Article 10-3E);
7. Private swimming pools;
8. Seasonal holiday decorations;
9. Window displays;
10. Pedestrian walkway lighting;
11. Residential lighting (excluding luminaires for the sidewalks and roadways);
12. Streetlights shall be designed and installed per Section 10-3G-2, subsection W of this
Code;
13. Low light output (under 750 delivered lumens) decorative luminaires; and
14. Accent lighting on the municipal, state, or national flags that is properly shielded to limit
direct glare.
D. General Standards. The following general standards shall apply to all nonexempt outdoor
lighting fixtures and accent lighting:
4873-3317-1122.34873-3317-1122.4
1. All outdoor lighting fixtures and accent lighting shall be designed, installed, located and
maintained such that there is no light trespass onto adjacent properties under separate
ownership unless the adjacent property owner grants an easement to extend the area
of light trespass onto the adjacent property, provided that such easement is perpetual
in duration and recorded with the Spokane County Auditor;
2. Outdoor lighting fixtures and accent lighting must be shielded and aimed downward
(except as noted). The light must be aimed to ensure that the illumination is only
pointing downward onto the ground surface, with no escaping direct light permitted to
contribute to light pollution by shining upward into the sky;
3. Outdoor lighting fixtures and accent lighting shall not directly illuminate public
waterways such as the Spokane River, unless it is a navigational light subject to state
or federal regulations;
4. Accent/architectural lighting shall be directed onto the illuminated object or area and not
toward the sky or onto adjacent properties under separate ownership. Colored lighting is
allowed for accent as long as it meets this standard. All accent lighting must be included
in trespass calculations noted. Uplight accent lighting is allowed as long as it does not
exceed 750 delivered lumens;
5. Spotlighting on landscaping and foliage may be directed upward and shall be limited
to luminaires with no more than 750 delivered lumens and comply with other
standards in this section.
6. Accent lighting on statues/monuments shall be limited to luminaires with no more
than 750 delivered lumens and comply with other standards in this section; and
7. Accent lighting on flags (except as noted above) shall be limited to luminaires with no
more than 750 delivered lumens and comply with other standards in this section.
E. Prohibited.
1. The following fixtures (luminaires) are prohibited:
a. searchlights for any other purpose other than temporary emergency lighting or
as allowed under the City Signage Standards (Article 10-3E);
b. laser lights or any similar high-intensity light for outdoor use or entertainment;
2. The city reserves the right to further restrict outdoor lighting including, but not limited to,
pole height and level of illumination, when it is deemed to be in the best public interest
consistent with the purpose of this Section.
F. Temporary Outdoor Lighting. Any temporary outdoor lighting that conforms to the requirements
of this code shall be allowed. Nonconforming temporary outdoor lighting may be permitted by the
zoning administrator for a limited duration, provided that the applicant can demonstrate that such
temporary lighting is in the public interest, and any potential annoyance or safety concerns that
may result from the non-conforming temporary outdoor lighting can be mitigated through
conditions of approval.
G. Recreational Facilities. Any light source permitted by this code may be used for lighting of
outdoor recreational facilities (public or private). Including, including but not limited to football
fields, soccer fields, baseball fields, tennis courts, or show areas, provided all of the following
conditions are met:
1. All fixtures used for event lighting shall be fully shielded or provided with sharp cut-off
capability, so as to minimize up-light, spill-light and glare.
2. All events shall be scheduled so as to complete all activity before or as near to 10:30
p.m. as practical, but under no circumstance shall any illumination of the playing field,
4873-3317-1122.34873-3317-1122.4
court, or track be permitted after 11:00 p.m. except to conclude a scheduled event that
was in progress before 11:00 p.m., and circumstances prevented its conclusion before
11:00 p.m. Commercial uses in the M1, M2, M3, C1, C2, and I zones that have an
outdoor recreational facility shall not be subject to the time restrictions on illumination set
forth in this Section.
3. Commercial uses in the M1, M2, M3, C1, C2, and I zones that have an outdoor
recreational facility may use light fixtures that have a rating of G5 or less under the BUG
rating system.
H. Lamp or Fixture Substitution. Should any light fixture regulated under this Section, or the type
of light source therein, be changed after the permit has been issued, a change request must be
submitted to the Zoning Administrator for his/her approval, together with adequate information
to assure compliance with this code, which must be received prior to substitution.
I. Administration. Outdoor lighting plans shall be reviewed by the Department. Approval of the
plan shall be based on conformance with this Section. The Zoning Administrator has the
discretion to require the re-direction of existing light fixtures when it is determined that the fixture
is creating off-site glare not permitted by the approved lighting plan.
J. Plan Review. Lighting plans shall address the following criteria:
1. Backlight and light trespass to adjacent properties. Applicant must provide a site plan
with photometric calculations at the property line. The maintained foot-candle levels
can be no more 0.1 at the property line and 0.0 10’ beyond the property line, unless
permitted under Section 10-3F-2(D)(1).
2. Uplight and skyglow. Using the Backlight, Uplight, and Glare (BUG) rating system,
applicants must provide the luminaire specification sheets for all exterior fixtures
showing no higher than a U0 for up-light. Exception: Luminaires with higher than U0
can be used if they are installed on the underside of an opaque surface that blocks all
up-light (i.e. Soffits and canopies).
3. Glare and luminaire brightness. Using the BUG system rating system, applicants must
provide luminaire specification sheets for all exterior fixtures showing no higher than a
G1 in residential zones R1, R2, and R3; no higher than G2 in Mixed-Use zones M1, M2,
and M3 as well as Public zones P; and G3 in Commercial and Industrial Zones C1, C2,
and I. Open zones, O, shall not have luminaires with higher than G0 rating.
4873-3317-1122.34873-3317-1122.4
Summary report:
Litera Compare for Word 11.4.0.111 Document comparison done on
3/29/2024 12:38:50 PM
Style name: Default Style
Intelligent Table Comparison: Active
Original DMS: nd://4873-3317-1122/3/Frontera - Development Code -
Revisions.docx
Modified DMS: nd://4873-3317-1122/4/Frontera - Development Code -
Revisions.docx
Changes:
Add 9
Delete 3
Move From 0
Move To 0
Table Insert 0
Table Delete 0
Table moves to 0
Table moves from 0
Embedded Graphics (Visio, ChemDraw, Images etc.) 0
Embedded Excel 0
Format changes 0
Total Changes: 12
Get email alerts for Liberty Lake
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.