Site Plan & Architectural Review Committee

SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL AGENDA Date: April 14, 2021 REVIEW COMMITTEE Time: 5:15 P.M. Carnegie Forum 305 West Pine Street, Lodi Streaming Links: https://www.facebook.com/CityofLodi/ https://zoom.us/j/92963331153?pwd=QVZlNVVVa3VEN1U2aTJRN1ZHMnZkZz09 Effective immediately and while social distancing measures are imposed, all meetings of the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee will be held virtually. All Committee Members will appear telephonically or via Zoom. The following alternatives are available to members of the public to watch Planning Commission meetings and provide comments on agenda and non-agenda items before and during the meetings. Viewing: Members of the public may view and listen to the open session of the meeting by clicking the below links or pasting the link into a browsers https://zoom.us/j/92963331153?pwd=QVZlNVVVa3VEN1U2aTJRN1ZHMnZkZz09 Passcode: 378086 Or iPhone one-tap: Us: +16699009128,,96951605474 Or Telephone: Dial: Us: +1 669 900 9128; Webinar ID: 929 6333 1153 Public Comment: Members of the public may provide comment via Zoom video conferencing at the following link: https://zoom.us/j/92963331153?pwd=QVZlNVVVa3VEN1U2aTJRN1ZHMnZkZz09 Public Comments are limited to five minutes per person. Members of the public may submit written comment prior to or during the meeting. Comments should be submitted to the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee (SPARC) sparccomments@lodi.gov (or via mail sent to: Community Development Department, P.O. Box 3006, Lodi CA 95241). Written comments received two hours prior to the start of the meeting will be provided to the SPARC and filed as part of the official record of the meeting. Five minutes of each written comment received before the Chair announces that the time for public comment is closed will be read into the record. IMPORTANT: Identify the Agenda Item Number in the subject line of your email. Example: Public Comment for Agenda Item Number 4a DISCRIPTION. Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Executive Order N-29-20, if you need special assistance to provide public comment in this meeting, please contact the Office of the Community Development Department at (209) 333-6711 or sparccomments@lodi.gov at least 48hours prior to the meeting in order for the City to make reasonable alternative arrangements for you to communicate your comments. If you need special assistance in this meeting for purposes other than providing public comment, please contact the Community Development Department at (209) 333- 6711 or sparccomments@lodi.gov at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.160 (b) (1)). SPECIAL TELECONFERENCE NOTICE Pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20: The Brown Act, Government Code Section 54953, contains special requirements that apply when members of a legislative body participate in a public meeting by telephone. Certain of these requirements have been suspended by Paragraph 3 of Executive Order N-29-20, executed by the Governor of California on March 17, 2020 to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus known as COVID-19. In particular, the Executive Order suspends that provision of the Brown Act that requires noticing, posting of agendas, and public access to each location where a member will be participating telephonically, as well as provisions that require physical presence of members of the legislative body or the public for purposes of a quorum or to hold a meeting. Executive Order N-29-20 allows an agency to conduct a teleconference meeting that provides members of the public telephonic or other electronic participation in place of making a physical location for the public to observe the meeting and provide public comment, consistent with other provisions of the Brown Act. SPARC Agenda April 14, 2021 For information regarding this agenda please contact: Kari Chadwick @ (209) 333-6711 Community Development Secretary 1. ROLL CALL 2. MINUTES – March 10, 2021 3. COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC (NON-AGENDA ITEMS) If you wish to address the Committee, please refer to the Special Teleconference Notice at the beginning of this agenda. Individuals are limited to one appearance during this section. 4. REVIEW ITEMS a. Request of Site Plan and Architecture Review Committee (SPARC) to consider façade improvements at 610 W. Kettleman Lane for the existing Grocery Store (Food Maxx); (Applicant: Rod Alonzo for Save Mart Companies; File Number: 2021-004 SP; CEQA Determination: Exempt Per Section 15301) b. Request of Site Plan and Architecture Review Committee (SPARC) to consider Site Plan and Architectural Review for two new commercial buildings at 3 Commerce St. (Applicant: Gary Tsutsumi.; File Number: 2021-005 SP; CEQA Determination: Exempt Per Section 15332) NOTE: The above item is a quasi-judicial hearing and requires disclosure of ex parte communications as set forth in Resolution No. 2006-31 5. REGULAR BUSINESS 6. COMMENTS BY SPARC MEMBERS & STAFF (NON-AGENDA ITEMS) 7. ADJOURNMENT Pursuant to Section 54954.2(a) of the Government Code of the State of California, this agenda was posted at least 72 hours in advance of the scheduled meeting at a public place freely accessible to the public 24 hours a day. **NOTICE: Pursuant to Government Code §54954.3(a), public comments may be directed to the legislative body concerning any item contained on the agenda for this meeting before (in the case of a Closed Session item) or during consideration of the item. Right of Appeal: If you disagree with the decision of the commission, you have a right of appeal. Only persons who participated in the review process by submitting written or oral testimony, or by attending the public hearing, may appeal. Pursuant to Lodi Municipal Code Section 17.70.050, actions of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by filing, within ten (10) business days, a written appeal with the City Clerk and payment of $300.00 appeal fee. The appeal shall be processed in accordance with Chapter 17.70, Appeals, of the Lodi Municipal Code. Contact: City Clerk, City Hall 2nd Floor, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California 95240 – Phone: (209) 333-6702. Page 2 of 2  SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET WEDNESDAY, MARCH 10, 2021 MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL The Regular Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee meeting of Wednesday, March 10, 2021 was called to order by Chair Slater at 5:15 p.m. Present: Committee Members Diehl, Stafford and Chair Slater Absent: Committee Members Craig and Rosado Also Present: Community Development Director John Della Monica, Deputy City Attorney Katie Lucchesi, Contract Planner Joann Martinez and Administrative Assistant Kari Chadwick 2. MINUTES None 3. COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC None 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Notice thereof having been published according to law, an affidavit of which publication is on file in the Community Development Department, Chair Slater called for the public hearing to consider the request of Site Plan and Architecture Review Committee (SPARC) to consider Site Plan and Architectural Review for the existing Kettleman Station Shopping Mall for façade improvements at 400 E. Kettleman Lane (Applicant: John A. Vierra for Matt Teresi; File Number: 2021-002 SP; CEQA Determination: Exempt Per Section 15301) John Della Monica, Community Development Director, introduced contract Planner Joann Martinez, to present the item. Joann Martinez, Contract Planner, gave a brief presentation based on the staff report. Staff is recommending approval of the project as conditioned with a minor change to reflect the phasing to condition number five. Chair Slater asked about lighting for the site. Ms. Martinez stated that there will be upgrades to lighting and the applicant can answer the specific questions regarding the sign lighting. Member Diehl stated his support with how the project looks and the improvement it will make to the center. Member Stafford stated that most of his questions were answered by the presentation. He asked what safety measures were being taken to protect the dinners sitting in the new outdoor space. Ms. Martinez stated that she would prefer the applicant to answer that question. Mr. Stafford stated his appreciation of the design of the awnings. March 10, 2021 SPARC Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 Hearing Opened to the Public • John Vierra, NJA Architect and representative for the applicant, came forward to address questions. He introduced Enrique Martinez, NJA project manager, and Matt Teresi, owner representative, who will also be speaking regarding the project • Enrique Martinez, representative with NJA Architects for the applicant, came forward to address questions. • Joann Martinez stated that one of the Committee Members had a question regarding lighting. John Vierra stated that there will be some backlighting or up lighting on the signage, direct lighting at each suite as well as some up lighting of the landscaping. • Chair Slater asked if Roger’s concern regarding protection for the seating area in case a vehicle loses control could be addressed. Mr. Martinez stated that there is a concrete wall behind the fountain that should act as a barrier. • Member Stafford asked for clarification regarding the monument signs lighting. Mr. Vierra stated that there are a couple of options; one is for back lighting and the other is for up lighting of the face and it will depend on the budget which option the applicant chooses. Mr. Stafford asked if the applicant is comfortable with the conditions of approval. Mr. Vierra stated that the only issue they had was with condition number five and staff has worked with them to make the changes. • Director Della Monica stated that the signage and landscaping plans will be submitted as a separate submittal for director review. Public Portion of Hearing Closed MOTION / VOTE: The Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee on motion of SPARC Member Diehl, Stafford second, approved the request for Site Plan and Architectural Review for the existing Kettleman Station Shopping Mall for façade improvements at 400 E. Kettleman Lane subject to the draft conditions of approval with the change to condition number 5. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Commissioners – Diehl, Stafford and Chair Slater Noes: Commissioners – None Absent: Commissioners - Craig and Rosado 5. REGULAR BUSINESS Mr. Della Monica stated that the next meeting that SPARC will have an item ready for review is currently April 14th. 6. COMMENTS BY SPARC MEMBERS AND STAFF Member Stafford asked about the realtor signage and how long they can remain on walls and fences along Lower Sacramento Road. Mr. Della Monica stated that he believes that it is 45 days from the start of building, but that the time can be extended. Chair Slater stated that there is a new resident on the north east side of the Kettleman Lane train trellis underpass that is a little messy. He would like to alert CalTrans. J:\Community Development\Planning\MINUTES\SP 2013 2 March 10, 2021 SPARC Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3 Chair Slater asked how the Tiny Homes project is progressing. Mr. Della Monica stated that the project should be breaking ground soon. 7. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 5:42 p.m. ATTEST: Kari Chadwick Administrative Assistant J:\Community Development\Planning\MINUTES\SP 2013 3 Item 4a.  CITY OF LODI SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Staff Report MEETING DATE: April 14, 2021 APPLICATION NO: 2021-004 SP REQUEST: Request of Site Plan and Architecture Review Committee (SPARC) to consider façade improvements at 610 W. Kettleman Lane for the existing Grocery Store (Food Maxx); (Applicant: Rod Alonzo for Save Mart Companies; File Number: 2021-004 SP; CEQA Determination: Exempt Per Section 15301) LOCATION: 610 W. Kettleman Lane Lodi, CA 95240 APN: 060-040-11 APPLICANT: Rod Alonzo For Save Mart Companies 1800 Standiford Ave Modesto CA, 95240 PROPERTY OWNER: Save Mart Companies 1800 Standiford Ave Modesto CA, 95240 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee approve the request of Rod Alonzo for Save Mart Companies for the proposed façade and site improvements to the existing Grocery Store located at 610 W. Kettleman Lane, subject to the SPARC Common Design Requirements and Supplemental Conditions outlined below at the end of the staff report. PROJECT/AREA DESCRIPTION General Plan Designation: Mixed Use Corridor Zoning Designation: PD (15) Property Size: 203425 sf / 4.67 acres SUMMARY The applicant proposes façade and site improvements of the existing Grocery Store located at 610 W. Kettleman Lane, has reviewed the proposed plans for conformance with City policies, and recommends approval based upon findings and subject to conditions. 1 BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS The following sections describe the site and its setting: • General Plan and Zoning • Existing Land Use General Plan and Zoning The site is designated Commercial on the General Plan Land Use Map and General Commercial on the Zoning Map, as shown below in Figures 1 and 2. Table A: Adjacent General Plan Zoning Designations and Land Uses General Plan Zoning Classification Existing Land Use North Mixed Use Corridor PD 15 Shopping Center (retail, restaurant, office etc.) South Low Density Residential PD 15 Single Family Housing East Mixed Use Corridor PD 15 Shopping Center (retail, restaurant, office etc.) West Mixed Use Corridor PD 15 Shopping Center (retail, restaurant, office etc.) Project Site Mixed Use Corridor PD 15 Shopping Center (retail, restaurant, office etc.) Development standards for the General Commercial zoning district are summarized below. Table B: General Commercial Development Standards Setbacks Front 10 feet Street Side 10 feet Side 5 feet Rear 10 feet Floor Area Ratio 1.2 Height Limit 4 stories, not to exceed 60 ft. Landscaping Per Zoning Code Chapter 17.30 Parking Per Zoning Code Chapter 17.32 1 Table C: Parking Parking is not affected by updates. Parking is met per City standards. 2  Figure 1: General Plan The Commercial General Plan land use designation is described as follows: The Mixed-Use Corridor classification includes a variety of office and general commercial uses, as well as low-, medium-, and high-density residential along the city’s major corridors: Kettleman and Cherokee lanes and Lodi Avenue. This category allows for somewhat more intensive development along these corridors to take advantage of vacant and underutilized sites and provide shopping and services to residents in highly accessible corridors. The maximum FAR for this designation is 1.2. Medium Public Density Residential Low Density Residential Mixed Use Corridor Medium Density Low Density Residential Residential 3  Figure 2: Zoning The PD 15 zoning district is described as follows: Beckman Ranch is the area bounded by: Kettleman Lane, Hutchins Street, Century Blvd. and Woodbridge Irrigation Canal. Beckman ranch consists of the following zoning designations: Single Family Dwelling, Duplex, Zero Lot Line Single Family, Condo, Religious Institution, and Commercial Restaurant. Medium Public Density Residential Low Density Residential Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use Corridor PD (15) Medium Density Residential 4 EXISTING LAND USE A Shopping Center currently occupies the site, most of which is occupied. Figure 3: Existing Site Aerial Photos of the site in its existing condition are shown below. 5 Figure 4: Existing Site, Buildings and Landscaping 6 PROPOSED PROJECT The applicant is proposing: • New façade improvements to the existing supermarket building. • The applicant has proposed a new paint scheme, it will include mixture of natural colors that will complement the existing center and create distinct entry features. • The façade improvements will include a new metal cladding panels at the front of the building along with new metal clad soffit at the entry. The applicant has provided proposed elevations, site plans etc. (Figure 5 - 11). The project proposal helps modernize an existing commercial center with updated colors, textures and elevations. Figure 5: Proposed Site Plan 7 Figure 6: North Elevation – Perspective View Figure 7: North Elevation Figure 8: South Elevation Figure 9: West Elevation Figure 9: Wall Section (Existing / Proposed) 8 FINDINGS The project has been reviewed in accordance with the City’s General Plan, the Municipal Development Code standards, and the City’s Design Guidelines. Based upon City evaluation and analysis, staff recommends that the SPARC adopt the findings of this report and approve the proposed modification to the existing buildings. The design and architecture of the proposed project, as conditioned, complies with the Findings for Architectural Review as required in Lodi Development Code 17.40.020 (E): 1. The design is consistent and compatible with the design standards/guidelines of the applicable zoning district. Comment: The project site is zoned PD 15. The project applicant is proposing façade and site improvements that modernizes the center and is consistent with other commercial developments in Lodi. The proposal does not include new buildings on the site. 2. The project will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and does not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. Comment: The proposal does not include any new buildings on the project site and will not create altered circulation patterns. 3. The project shall maintain and enhance the affirmative, harmonious, and orderly development contemplated by the Development Code. Comment: The proposed façade improvements are visually compatible with the rest of the commercial center and neighborhood. The façade modernization will enhance the aesthetics of the commercial center and has the potential to help modernize the rest of the center buildings. 4. The project provides a desirable environment for its occupants, neighbors, and visiting public through good aesthetic use of durable materials, texture, and color. Comment: The project design promotes visual environments that are of high aesthetic quality and variety. 5. The project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Comment: The project is consistent with the Lodi Development Code and adopted City standards. The project proposal is an investment into an existing commercial facility. All improvements are on private property and approval of the proposed project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The site of the proposed project can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. 6. Comment: The project is found to be categorically exempt from CEQA review under 14 CCR §15301. Class 1 consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency’s determination. The key consideration is whether the project involves negligible or no expansion of an existing use. The project proposal does not increase the intensity of the project site. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Staff’s recommended conditions of approval for the proposed project are included in the attachments to this report. 9 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE: Legal Notice for the Use Permit was published in the Lodi News Sentinel on Saturday, April 3, 2021. Fifty-Seven (57) public hearing notices were sent to all property owners of record within a 300-foot radius of the project site as required by California State Law §65091 (a) 3. Public notice also was mailed to interested parties who expressed their interest of the project. Respectfully Submitted, Concur, Joann Martinez John R Della Monica Jr. Contract Assistant City Planner Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS: A. Applicant Submittal B. Conditions of Approval 10  Conditions of Approval Site Plan and Architectural Review 2021-004 Food Maxx, 610 W. Kettleman Lane APN 060-040-11 1. The project proponent and/or the property owner and/or successors in interest and management shall, at their sole expense, defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lodi, its agents, officers, directors and employees, from and against all claims, actions, damages, losses, or expenses of every type and description, including but not limited to payment of attorneys’ fees and costs, by reason of, or arising out of, this SPARC approval. The obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall include, but is not limited to, any action to arbitrate, attack, review, set aside, void or annul this SPARC approval on any grounds whatsoever. The City of Lodi shall promptly notify the developer of any such claim, action, or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. The project proponent shall submit appropriate plans to the Community Development Department for plan check and building permit. The plans shall include architectural features such as the colors, elevation including all other elements approved by the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee. Any significant alteration to the site plan as approved by the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee shall require an action by the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee. Minor changes, however, may be approved subject to review and approval of the Community Development Director. 3. The developer/applicant shall construct and operate the project in strict compliance with the approvals granted herein, City standards, laws, and ordinances, and in compliance with all State and Federal laws, regulations, and standards. In the event of a conflict between City laws and standards and a State or Federal law, regulation, or standard, the stricter or higher standard shall control. 4. The project shall be developed in accordance with the Site Plan and Architectural Review approved by the SPARC on April 14, 2021, including the approved site plan, architectural elevations, colors, materials, etc., including all changes required by these conditions of approval. 5. The applicant shall comply with all of the conditions from the Public Works Department, below. 6. The applicant shall comply with all of the conditions from the Building and Safety Department, below. 7. Any roof-mounted equipment not shown on the plans approved by the SPARC shall be subject to review and approval by the City to ensure that adequate screening is provided to prevent view of the equipment from the public right of way. 8. All signs shall be in strict compliance with the City of Lodi’s Zoning Ordinances. All signage shall be subject to review and approval of the Community Development Director. All signage shall be individual channel letters or the equivalent. No exposed raceway shall be permitted with the signage. All identification signs shall require a building permit. Building Department (General Comments): 9. Any changes to the existing buildings, which are regulated by the current codes, shall require a building permit. All plan submittals shall be based on the City of Lodi Building Regulations and currently adopted 2016 California Building code. Please review our policy handouts for specific submittal procedures. 10. The California Building Code (Title 24 Section 11B-202) requires that existing buildings, when alterations are made, shall be verified for compliance with disabled access requirements. These requirements shall apply only to the specific area of alteration and shall include an accessible entrance, an accessible route to the altered area, at least one accessible restroom for each sex, telephones and drinking fountains (if existing), and when possible additional items such as parking, storage and alarms. Public Works The Public Works Department has the following comments regarding the approval of the SPARC review for 610 West Kettleman Lane: 11. Project Remove and replace all damaged or non ADA-conforming sidewalk and driveways fronting the subject parcel in conformance with City of Lodi Standard Plans, if applicable. These improvements, if required, shall be done under the terms of a CalTrans encroachment permit. 12. All existing survey monuments are to be preserved per California Senate Bill 1467. It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure that monuments are properly protected and/or perpetuated. If any of the monuments are to be disturbed or are near the area of construction, a licensed surveyor must confirm that the monuments have been protected and/or perpetuated and the appropriate documentation has been recorded. 13. As required by the California Green Building Code (CALGreen), project shall participate in the Construction and Demolition Recycling Program. 14. Obtain the following permits: a. Building permit issued by the City of Lodi Building Division. b. Encroachment Permit issued from CalTrans for any work within the Kettleman Lane right of way. 15. Payment of the following fees prior to building permit issuance unless noted otherwise: a. Fees and charges for services performed by City forces per the Public Works Fee and Service Charge Schedule. i. (The fees referenced above are subject to periodic adjustment as provided by the implementing ordinance/resolution. The fee charged will be that in effect at the time of collection indicated above.) 16. Additional comments and conditions will be provided during the building permit review process when more detailed plans are available. Item 4b.  CITY OF LODI SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Staff Report MEETING DATE: April 14, 2021 APPLICATION NO: PL2021-005 REQUEST: Request of Site Plan and Architecture Review Committee (SPARC) to consider Site Plan and Architectural Review for two new commercial buildings at 3 Commerce St. (Applicant: Gary Tsutsumi.; File Number: 2021-005 SP; CEQA Determination: Exempt Per Section 15332) LOCATION: 3 Commerce Street APN: 049-190-01 APPLICANT: Gary Tsustumi 2379 Maggio Circle Suite J Lodi, CA 95240 PROPERTY OWNER: Gary Tsustumi 2379 Maggio Circle Suite J Lodi, CA 95240 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee approve SPARC Review 2021-005, subject to the proposed conditions of approval. PROJECT/AREA DESCRIPTION General Plan Designation: Industrial Zoning Designation: M (Industrial) Property Size: .03 acres - 13108 sq ft SUMMARY The applicant proposes to construct two new industrial buildings for storage and a future tenant. The project site and existing surrounding buildings are shown in Figure 1, below, and in the street view photos later in this report. SPARC 3 Commerce St. April 14, 2021 Pg 2 of 15 Figure 1: Project Site Aerial Per the Lodi Zoning Code, the proposed facility requires approval of a site plan and architectural review by the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee (SPARC). The proposed use of the structure is permitted and does not require a conditional use permit. BACKGROUND The following sections describe the site and its setting: • General Plan and Zoning • Existing Land Use • Existing Land Use General Plan and Zoning The site is designated Industrial on both the General Plan Land Use Map and the Zoning Map, as shown below. 2 SPARC 3 Commerce St. April 14, 2021 Pg 3 of 15 Table A: Adjacent General Plan Zoning Designations and Land Uses General Plan Zoning Classification Existing Land Use North Industrial M (Industrial) Light industrial South Industrial M (Industrial) Office and light industrial East Industrial M (Industrial) Light industrial West Industrial M (Industrial) Light industrial Project Site Industrial M (Industrial) Vacant Figure 2: General Plan and Zoning M (Industrial) M (Industrial) M (Industrial) Out of City Limits The Industrial General Plan land use designation is described as follows: The Industrial classification includes a mix of heavy manufacturing, warehousing, general service, storage, and distribution activities. This category includes the General Mills factory and existing uses along the railroad and east of SR-99. Industrial sites are available within and adjacent to the existing cluster of industrial uses in the east side of the city. The maximum FAR for this designation is 0.6. The M (Industrial) zoning district is described as follows: The M zoning district is applied to areas appropriate for a mix of heavy manufacturing, warehousing, general service, storage, and distribution activities. The maximum FAR is 0.6. The M zoning district is consistent with the industrial land use designation of the general plan. Development standards for the M zoning district are summarized below. 3 SPARC 3 Commerce St. April 14, 2021 Pg 4 of 15 Table B: M Zone Development Standards Setbacks Front 10 feet Street Side1 10 feet Side No setback required Rear No setback required Floor Area Ratio 0.60 Height Limit 70 feet Landscaping Per Zoning Code Chapter 17.30 Parking Per Zoning Code Chapter 17.32 The project meets all the standards for the M zoning district. Existing Land Use The site is currently vacant, the area around the project site is developed with a variety of light industrial uses. Aerial photos and street views of the project site are shown below. Figure 4: Existing Site and Vicinity Aerial View Photos of the site and the existing buildings to be demolished are shown below. 4 SPARC 3 Commerce St. April 14, 2021 Pg 5 of 15 Figure 5a: Street Views of Site View of project site from Guild Avenue, looking west. Figure 5b: Street Views of Site View of project site from Guild Avenue, looking south. PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project is a new industrial building. From the applicant’s submittal: The proposed project consists of redeveloping the site with the construction of two buildings. Building A will be for owners storage, 3,300 sf building. Building B will be for a future tenant, 1,225 sf. Buildings will be pre-engineered metal buildings matching the surrounding industial park. The proposed building is shown on the following page. 5 SPARC 3 Commerce St. April 14, 2021 Pg 6 of 15 Figure 6: Bird’s Eye View of Proposed Building B Figure 7: Bird’s Eye View of Proposed Building A 6 SPARC 3 Commerce St. April 14, 2021 Pg 7 of 15 Site Plan and Architecture A site plan of the proposed development, including adjacent parcel is shown below. The proposed buildings are located in the center of the site, with truck and vehicle access in the middle of the buildings. (A more detailed view of the site plan is provided as Attachment A.) Note: North is up ^ • Employee parking will be located in the middle of the two buildings. • A fence will be surrounding the whole property with two gates, one at each entrance. • Landscaping will be provided all around the buildings, the perimeter of the property. • The design of the proposed facility reflects the industrial character of the building and the surrounding area.). 7 SPARC 3 Commerce St. April 14, 2021 Pg 8 of 15 Figure 7: Proposed Fencing Plan (in red) 8 SPARC 3 Commerce St. April 14, 2021 Pg 9 of 15 Figure 8: Landscape Plan 9 SPARC 3 Commerce St. April 14, 2021 Pg 10 of 15 The proposed landscaping would include trees shading in the parking areas, as well as ornamental understory plantings. The project does include the installation of fences and gates at the perimeter of the site. The proposed project includes 6 parking spaces, including: • 5 standard parking spaces • 1 ADA-accessible parking space (without electrical vehicle charging) The project also proposes no bicycle parking spaces. The building will have roof-mounted equipment, which will be screened from public view by a combination of a parapet and the placement of the equipment. A proposed condition of approval is included to require staff review of any equipment not shown on the current plans. Figure 11: Materials and Colors Metal finish matching the surrounding buildings in color. 10 SPARC 3 Commerce St. April 14, 2021 Pg 11 of 15 ANALYSIS The following sections address several topics associated with the proposed project: • Compliance with M zoning district development standards • Industrial Design Guidelines • Landscaping and site improvements • Parking • Parking Lot Shading Staff’s analysis of these issues is provided below. Compliance with M Zoning District Development Standards The M zoning district includes the following development standards, which are shown with the proposed project’s measurements. As shown, the project complies with the development standards of the M zone. Table C: M Zoning District Development Standards M District Proposed Compliance Standard Project Setbacks Front 10 feet 10 feet Yes Street Side 10 feet 10 feet Yes Side No setback Landscaping is Yes required provided (landscaping must be provided) Rear No setback Landscaping is Yes required provided (landscaping must be provided) Floor Area Ratio 0.60 0.36 Yes Height Limit 70 feet 21 feet Yes Industrial Design Guidelines The Lodi Zoning Code includes architectural design guidelines for industrial uses (Zoning Code section 17.24.050). These guidelines provide, “… useful recommendations for the design construction, review, and approval of industrial development … [to] … ensure that new projects will be well designed, uphold the city's vision, and contribute to the quality of the public realm.” The guidelines for industrial development cover a variety of topics, including: 11 SPARC 3 Commerce St. April 14, 2021 Pg 12 of 15 • Building Orientation • Building Design and Architecture • Articulation and Detail • Roofs • Building Materials and Colors • Parking and Circulation • Landscaping • Lighting • Equipment, Service Area, and Refuse Screening • Metal Buildings In staff’s opinion, the proposed 3 Commerce industrial project meets the intent of the industrial design guidelines, and is a well-designed project. Parking Vehicle Parking The proposed building requires 5 parking spaces, as follows: Parking Use Area Spaces Required Requirement Building: A: 3,300 SF 3,300 SF 1 per 1,000 SF 5 B: 1,387 SF 1,387 SF Total Spaces Required: 5 Total Spaces Provided: 6 Parking Lot Shading The Lodi Zoning Code seeks to ensure that parking areas will have shade for both aesthetics and for the comfort of patrons and employees. The most direct standard is: "Landscaped areas within or adjacent to the parking area shall provide for a minimum of one shade tree for every four parking stalls. Depending on type and size of shade tree, requirements may be modified by the City Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee." [Zoning Code 17.32.070.D.2] Staff interprets this requirement to require that parking spaces alternate with trees every fourth space, providing shade throughout the parking lot. Staff views this as important in this particular case for the comfort of both visitors and staff, especially during Lodi’s hot summer months. The Code also includes "General Design Considerations" for parking areas that includes a variety of factors including, "Shading the parking lot by means of canopy trees or other landscaping." [Zoning Code 17.32.110.A.1.i] The Code also requires that, 12 SPARC 3 Commerce St. April 14, 2021 Pg 13 of 15 "Tree well and planting islands shall have a minimum dimension of eight feet and be excavated to a depth of three feet and filled with amended soil as necessary." [Zoning Code 17.32.110.F.9] The proposed landscape plan (Figure 11, earlier in this report, excerpt below) provides parking which meets these requirements. Figure 12: Landscape Plan Excerpt (Showing Typical Tree Spacing in yellow) FINDINGS The Lodi Municipal Code (Section 17.14.040 F) requires that the SPARC make the following findings in order to approve a site plan and architectural review application: 1. The design and layout of the proposed project would: a. Be consistent with the development and design standards/guidelines of the applicable zoning district; b. Not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; c. Maintain and enhance the attractive, harmonious, and orderly development contemplated by this development code; and d. Provide a desirable environment for its occupants, neighbors, and visiting public through good aesthetic use of durable materials, texture, and color. 2. The proposed development: a. Would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and b. Has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Lodi Environmental Review Guidelines [Zoning Code 17.040.020.E] 13 SPARC 3 Commerce St. April 14, 2021 Pg 14 of 15 Staff’s recommendations are shown below: 1a. The design and layout of the proposed project would be consistent with the development and design standards/guidelines of the applicable zoning district; Analysis: The proposed building complies with the development standards of the M district, including minimum and maximum height, floor area ratio, and parking The project will provide more parking than is required by the Zoning Code. 1b. The design and layout of the proposed project would not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; Analysis: The proposed project will not create any impediments to surrounding developments. The project includes safe pedestrian access into the site from the adjacent public sidewalk. 1c. The design and layout of the proposed project would maintain and enhance the attractive, harmonious, and orderly development contemplated by this development code; and Analysis: The project’s design, colors, and materials are appropriate for the type of building, and reflect a high level of design and quality. 1d. The design and layout of the proposed project would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, neighbors, and visiting public through good aesthetic use of durable materials, texture, and color. Analysis: The proposed project includes colors consistent with the type of building, and would be constructed with durable materials and finishes. 2a. The proposed development would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and Analysis: There is no evidence in the record to suggest that the proposed industrial building would result in any detriments to the public health, safety, or welfare. The project has been designed to be consistent with the Zoning Code and applicable public works, building, and other codes and requirements. 2b. Has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Lodi Environmental Review Guidelines. Analysis: The proposed project is exempt from environmental review per CEQA section 15332, as discussed below. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project meets the criteria for a “common sense” exemption from CEQA per CEQA Guidelines Section 15332: Class 32 consists of In-Fill Development Projects. The project is consistent with the General Plan, is located in the City limits, is less than 5-acres in size and is surrounded by existing 14 SPARC 3 Commerce St. April 14, 2021 Pg 15 of 15 urban uses. The project site is not a habitat for any rare or endangered species of plant or wildlife, and the project will not create a significant environmental impact. The project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and the site of the proposed project can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Staff’s recommended conditions of approval for the proposed project are included in the attachments to this report. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Legal Notice for this item was published in the Lodi News Sentinel on Saturday, April 3, 2021. Thirteen (13) public hearing notices were sent to all property owners of record within a 300- foot radius of the project site as required by California State Law §65091(a)3. Public notice also was mailed to interested parties who expressed their interest of the project. RECOMMENDED MOTION Staff recommends that the SPARC approve Site Plan and Architectural Review PL2020-035, subject to the attached conditions of approval. Should the Committee agree with staff’s recommendation, the following motion is suggested: “I move that the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee find that the proposed project is exempt from CEQA per CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 and approve site plan and architectural review PL2021-005, subject to the conditions of approval.” ALTERNTIVE SPARC ACTIONS • Approve the request with attached or alternate conditions • Deny the project • Continue the item to a future SPARC meeting Respectfully Submitted, Joann Martinez John Della Monica Contract Assistant Planner Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS: A. Detailed Plans B. Conditions of Approval 15  NO NO PARKING PARKING NO PARKING OFESSIO PR L W. N A AE S REG S E RE I T L H M G I NE E R EN M IC D I TH NO. CO44590 EXP. 3-31-22 S TA IA T E C I V I L ORN OF C ALI F THESE PLANS ARE PRELIMINARY AND NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS THERE IS A WET SIGNED SIGNATURE UPON STAMP  OFESSIO PR L W. N A AE S REG S E R E I T L H M GINE ER EN M IC D I TH NO. CO44590 EXP. 3-31-22 S TA IA T E C I V I L ORN OF C ALI F THESE PLANS ARE PRELIMINARY AND NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS THERE IS A WET SIGNED SIGNATURE UPON STAMP  OFESSIO PR L W. N A AE S REG S E R E I T L H M GINE ER EN M IC D I TH NO. CO44590 EXP. 3-31-22 S TA IA T E C I V I L ORN OF C ALI F THESE PLANS ARE PRELIMINARY AND NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS THERE IS A WET SIGNED SIGNATURE UPON STAMP 2/3/2021 SketchUp Model https://equote.cbcsteelbuildings.com/ProjectInformation/ProjectDrawings.aspx?projectId=905077&buildingId=1605879# 1/1 2/3/2021 SketchUp Model https://equote.cbcsteelbuildings.com/ProjectInformation/ProjectDrawings.aspx?projectId=905090&buildingId=1605899# 1/1 2/3/2021 SketchUp Model https://equote.cbcsteelbuildings.com/ProjectInformation/ProjectDrawings.aspx?projectId=905077&buildingId=1605879# 1/1 2/3/2021 SketchUp Model https://equote.cbcsteelbuildings.com/ProjectInformation/ProjectDrawings.aspx?projectId=905090&buildingId=1605899# 1/1  Conditions of Approval Site Plan and Architectural Review 2021-005 3 Commerce Street APN 049-190-01 1. The project proponent and/or the property owner and/or successors in interest and management shall, at their sole expense, defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lodi, its agents, officers, directors and employees, from and against all claims, actions, damages, losses, or expenses of every type and description, including but not limited to payment of attorneys’ fees and costs, by reason of, or arising out of, this SPARC approval. The obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall include, but is not limited to, any action to arbitrate, attack, review, set aside, void or annul this SPARC approval on any grounds whatsoever. The City of Lodi shall promptly notify the developer of any such claim, action, or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. The project proponent shall submit appropriate plans to the Community Development Department for plan check and building permit. The plans shall include architectural features such as the colors, elevation including all other elements approved by the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee. Any significant alteration to the site plan as approved by the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee shall require an action by the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee. Minor changes, however, may be approved subject to review and approval of the Community Development Director. 3. The developer/applicant shall construct and operate the project in strict compliance with the approvals granted herein, City standards, laws, and ordinances, and in compliance with all State and Federal laws, regulations, and standards. In the event of a conflict between City laws and standards and a State or Federal law, regulation, or standard, the stricter or higher standard shall control. 4. The project shall be developed in accordance with the Site Plan and Architectural Review approved by the SPARC on April 14, 2021, including the approved site plan, architectural elevations, colors, materials, etc., including all changes required by these conditions of approval. 5. The applicant shall comply with all of the conditions from the Public Works Department, below. 6. The applicant shall comply with all of the conditions from the Building and Safety Department, below. 7. Any roof-mounted equipment not shown on the plans approved by the SPARC shall be subject to review and approval by the City to ensure that adequate screening is provided to prevent view of the equipment from the public right of way. 8. All signs shall be in strict compliance with the City of Lodi’s Zoning Ordinances. All signage shall be subject to review and approval of the Community Development Director. All signage shall be individual channel letters or the equivalent. No exposed raceway shall be permitted with the signage. All identification signs shall require a building permit. 9. All landscape and irrigation plans shall be consistent with the requirements of Zoning Code Chapter 17.30, Landscaping, and other applicable codes and requirements. 10. Customer to ensure that the electrical utility has 24-hour access to the main panel. Main panel should be located in an accessible location for maintenance and readings. Building Department (General Comments): 11. The construction of the new buildings and related site improvements shall require building permits. All plan submittals shall be based on the City of Lodi Building Regulations and currently adopted 2019 California Building code. Please review our policy handouts for specific submittal procedures. 12. All buildings and structures shall have the required fire separation distance separation to the property lines as specified by the 2019 CBC, Table 602 or shall provide the required fire rated protection of walls, limitations of protected and unprotected openings for each building, as per 2019 CBC, Sections 705, Tables 601, 602 ,705.8 and 716.5 13. This project includes a shell building. A separate and complete tenant improvement plan submittal and permit is required prior to occupancy of each tenant space and issuance of a “Certificate of Occupancy”. Such plans shall specify the tenant’s name, type of business, and include a complete design for: Site & Building Accessibility, Occupancy, Exiting, Sanitation, Ventilation and other Habitability elements (i.e., envelope, lighting, mechanical design and energy reports)”. 14. Storage racks greater than 6’ in height are required to be submitted under separate permit and cover. Storage racks greater than 8’ in height shall be provided with structural calculations. Storage 12’ or greater in height must be reviewed as high piled storage.” City of Lodi Policy and Procedure B-[08]-[09] 15. Plans shall provide occupancy load calculations for each building based on square footage and the applicable occupant load factor from Table 1004.5. 2019 CBC, Section 1004.5 16. If the occupant load for either building exceeds 49, the plans shall show: a. A minimum of two (2) exits that are separated by a minimum of 1/2 (1/3 in sprinklered buildings) of the diagonal distance of the area served. 2019 CBC, Section 1007.1.1 b. Exit doors shall swing in the direction of egress travel. 2019 CBC, Section 1010.1.2.1 c. The exit doors and exit access doors shall be equipped with panic hardware. 2019 CBC, Section 1010.1.10 d. A means of illuminating the egress path of travel in case of power failure, including path to the egress doors, the corridor and the exterior landings. The emergency power system shall provide back up power for the duration of at least 90 minutes and shall illuminate the path of travel at the rate of an average of 1 foot candle at floor level. 2019 CBC, Sections 1008.1 thru 1008.3.5 e. Show locations of required illuminated exit signs. 2019 CBC, Section 1013 f. Provide complete and adequate details and locations of the required tactile exit signs at the following locations: i. Each grade-level exterior exit door shall be identified by a tactile exit sign with the word, “EXIT.” ii. Each exit access door from an interior room or area that is required to have a visual exit sign, shall be identified by a tactile exit sign with the words, “EXIT ROUTE.” 2019 CBC, Section 1013.4 17. Site Plan to show all building entrances and ground level exits shall be connected on an accessible route to other buildings on the site, public transportation stops, accessible parking and passenger loading zones and to public streets and sidewalks. 2019 CBC, Sections 11B-206.4.1, 11B-404, 11B-Division 4 18. Plans to specify walkways and sidewalks along accessible routes of travel (1) are continuously accessible, (2) have maximum 1/2" changes in elevation, (3) are minimum 48" in width, (4) have a maximum 2% cross slope, and (5) where necessary to change elevation at a slope exceeding 5% (i.e., 1:20) shall have ramps complying with 2019 CBC, Section 11B-405 or 11B-406 as appropriate. Where a walk crosses or  adjoins a vehicular way, and the walking surfaces are not separated by curbs, railings or other elements between the pedestrian areas and vehicular areas shall be defined by a continuous detectable warning which is 36” wide, complying with 2019 CBC, Sections 11B-247.1 & 11B-705.1.2.5. 19. Plans to specify and show accessible parking spaces in compliance with 2019 CBC, Sections 11B-208.2, 11B-502 and Table 11B-208.2. At least one space shall be van accessible as per 2019 CBC, Section 11B- 208.2.4. Provide complete and adequate accessible parking details to specify and show: a. A 9’ wide x 18’ deep accessible parking space(s) with 5’ wide striped access aisle. “Van accessible” parking spaces shall be a minimum 12’ wide x 18’ deep with a 5’ wide access aisle or 9’ wide with an 8’ wide access aisle. 2016 CBC, Section 11B-502.2 b. The access aisle(s) may be located on either side of the accessible parking space(s), except “van accessible” parking spaces shall have the access aisle located on the passenger side of the accessible parking space. Two accessible parking spaces shall be permitted to share a common access aisle. 2016 CBC, Sections 11B-502.3.4, 11B-502.3 c. The access aisles shall be marked with a blue painted borderline around their perimeter. The area within the blue borderlines shall be marked with hatched lines a maximum of 36” on center in a color contrasting with the aisle surface, preferable blue or white. The words “NO PARKING” shall be painted in 12” high white letters in each access aisle. 2016 CBC, Section 502.3.3 d. The accessible parking spaces and the access aisles shall not exceed 2% cross slope in any direction. 2016 CBC, Section 11B-502.4 20. Plans to specify location and provide complete and adequate details of the following required parking signage: a. "Unauthorized vehicles..." signs at all driveway entrances, or located adjacent to and visible from each accessible parking space. Indicate on the plans that the sign shall be filled out with the correct appropriate information to become a permanent part of the sign (Lodi Police Department, 209-333-6727). 2016 CBC, Section 11B-502.8 b. Specify permanently posted reflectorized parking space identification sign at each accessible parking space, 70-sq. inches in area, and mounted a minimum of 60" (80” when located in the path of travel) from bottom of sign to paving. Provide a "van accessible" sign at appropriate parking spaces. The sign may also be posted on a wall at the interior end of the parking space at a height of 36" above the finished walk or grade. An additional sign below the symbol of accessibility shall state “Minimum Fine $250”. 2016 CBC, Section 11B-502.6 c. Specify pavement-marking symbols at each accessible parking space. 2016 CBC, Section 11B- 502.6.4 21. Long and short term bicycle parking as required by the 2019 CGBC, Section 5.106.4 and designated parking spaces for Clean Air/Van Pool/EV vehicles as required by the 2019 CGBC, Section 5.106.5.2 shall be provided. 22. Plans shall show facilitation for future installations of Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) for the charging of electric vehicles. The number of Electric Vehicle (EV) charging spaces to be provided shall be as per the 2019 CGBS, Table 5.106.5.3.3. The plans shall specify: 1) The type and locations of the EVSE(s), 2) Raceways that originate at the service panel or subpanel serving the area, and shall terminate in close proximity to the proposed location(s) of the charging equipment and into listed, suitable cabinets, boxes, enclosures or equivalent. 3) Plan design shall be based on 40 amp minimum branch circuits. 4) Electrical calculations shall substantiate the electric system design to include the rating of the equipment and any on-site transformers and have sufficient capacity to simultaneously charge all required EVs at its full rated amperage. 5) The service panel or sub-panel shall have sufficient capacity to accommodate the required number of dedicated branch circuits for the future installation  of the EVSE. 6) Future EV charging spaces qualify as designated clean air vehicle spaces. 2019 CGBS, Section 5.106.5.3 Be aware, in determining the location(s) of the EVSE(s) to take into consideration accessibility requirements for the future installation of EV charging spaces. Minimum number of accessible EV charging spaces will be required as per 2019 CBC, Table 11B-228.3.2.1 at the time of installation. Accessible EV charging spaces are required to comply with 2019 CBC, Section 11B-812 and to be located on an accessible route. The accessible EV charging spaces are not considered accessible parking spaces for the purpose of calculating the minimum number of accessible parking spaces as per 2019 CBC, Sections 11B-208.1, 11B-208.2, & Table 11B-208.2 23. Unless the building meet one of the exceptions of 2019 CPC, Section 422.2 (allowing a unisex restroom), separate toilet facilities shall be provided for each sex. Plumbing occupant load shall be calculated using the plumbing occupant load factor specified by 2019 CPC Table A for each area use. The required number of plumbing fixtures (water closets, urinals, lavatories) shall be provided, as specified for each occupancy by 2019 CPC, Table 422.1. 24. Restrooms will be required to be accessible as per 2019 CBC, Section 11B-213xxx Public Works The Public Works Department has the following comments regarding the approval of the SPARC review for 3 Commerce Street: 25. Project Project design and construction shall be in compliance with applicable terms and conditions of the City’s Stormwater Management Plan (SMP), and shall employ the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the SMP. a. Conformance with the City’s Stormwater Development Standards will be required with this project and an appropriately sized sand/oil trap in compliance with City of Lodi Standard Plan 315 shall be installed onsite before discharging storm water to the public system (if one does not exist already). b. State-mandated, year around construction site inspections to assure compliance with the City of Lodi Storm Discharge Permit are required. The fee for the inspections is the responsibility of the developer. 26. Existing water, wastewater, and storm water services to the parcel shall be utilized for this project, if possible. Otherwise the developer is responsible to abandon any excess/unused connections and install new service connections to the public facilities at the developer’s expense. 27. If a new connection to the City’s storm system is proposed with this project, then submit a Project Stormwater Plan in compliance with the Multi-Agency Post-Construction Stormwater Standards Manual (PCSP) as adopted by City Council on November 4, 2015. If connection to the existing onsite shared storm drain system is proposed for this project, then this development would be considered as part of a planned development and no PCSP shall be required. 28. If fire service is needed it shall be installed according to the City of Lodi Design Standards § 4.403. 29. The parking lot shall be designed in conformance with City of Lodi Standard Plan 134. The first parking stall shall continue to be located a minimum of 10-feet from the street Right-of-Way. 30. The proposed slide gates shall be remained open during business hours to avoid stacking of vehicles onto the public street. 31. All existing Public Utility Easements (PUEs) shall be clearly identified and labeled to ensure no structures are being proposed within the City Right-of-Way (ROW) or PUEs. 32. Irrigation plans and plantings shall conform to the Model Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance (MWELO) per the Governor’s Executive Order B-29-12 adopted on December 31, 2015, if the proposed landscape area is larger than 500 square feet. 33. As required by the California Green Building Code (CALGreen), project shall participate in the Construction and Demolition Recycling Program. 34. All on-site water wells and septic systems, if any, shall be abandoned in conformance with applicable City and County codes and requirements prior to the approval of the public improvement plans. A copy of the abandonment permit shall be submitted to the City after the completion of the abandonment. 35. The City of Lodi is a participant in the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP). An application for evaluation of the project site with respect to SJMSCP requirements shall be submitted to the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) prior to commencement of any clearing, grading or construction activities on the project site. 36. Install the proposed driveways and remove and replace all damaged or non ADA-conforming sidewalk, driveways, and ramps fronting the subject parcel in conformance with City of Lodi Standard Plans. 37. All project design and construction shall be in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Project compliance with ADA standards is the developer’s responsibility. 38. Prior to any work within City Right-of- Way and Public Utility Easements, the applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. 39. All existing survey monuments are to be preserved per California Senate Bill 1467. It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure that monuments are properly protected and/or perpetuated. If any of the monuments are to be disturbed or are near the area of construction, a licensed surveyor must confirm that the monuments have been protected and/or perpetuated and the appropriate documentation has been recorded. 40. Obtain the following permits: a. Building permit issued by the City of Lodi Building Division. b. Encroachment Permit issued from the City of Lodi Public Works Department for any work within the City’s public right of way or on existing public water, wastewater, and storm drain infrastructure. c. San Joaquin County well/septic abandonment permit (if needed). 41. Payment of the following fees prior to building permit issuance unless noted otherwise: a. Fees and charges for services performed by City forces per the Public Works Fee and Service Charge Schedule. b. Installation of water and wastewater services by City Forces if current services shall be upsized. c. Abandonment of existing water and wastewater services by City Forces, if applicable. d. Water meter installation fees. e. Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF). f. Encroachment permit fee. g. Habitat Conservation fee. h. County Facilities fees. i. Stormwater Compliance Inspection Fee prior to building permit issuance or commencement of construction operations, whichever occurs first, if applicable. j. Post Construction Storm Water Plan Check fee, if applicable k. MWELO Compliance Plan Check fee, if applicable. 42. Payment of the following fee prior to temporary occupancy or occupancy of the building unless noted otherwise: a. Development Impact Mitigation Fees per the Public Works Fee and Service Charge Schedule.  i. (The fees referenced above are subject to periodic adjustment as provided by the implementing ordinance/resolution. The fee charged will be that in effect at the time of collection indicated above.) 43. Additional comments and conditions will be provided during the building permit review process when more detailed plans are available