City Planning Commission

Información en Español acerca de esta junta puede ser obtenida Ilamando al (213) 978-1300 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING THURSDAY, JULY 26, 2007, 8:30 A.M. VAN NUYS CITY HALL 14410 SYLVAN STREET COUNCIL CHAMBER, 2ND FLOOR VAN NUYS, CALIFORNIA, 91401 Jane Ellison Usher, President S. Gail Goldberg, Director William Roschen, Vice President Eva Yuan-McDaniel, Deputy Director Diego Cardoso, Commissioner Regina M. Freer, Commissioner Robin R. Hughes, Commissioner Sabrina Kay, Commissioner Fr. Spencer T. Kezios, Commissioner Cindy Montañez, Commissioner Michael K. Woo, Commissioner Gabriele Williams, Commission Executive Assistant II POLICY FOR DESIGNATED PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NOs. 5, 6, 8 and 9. Pursuant to the Commission=s general operating procedures, the Commission at times must necessarily limit the speaking times of those presenting testimony on either side of an issue that is designated as a public hearing item. In all instances, however, equal time is allowed for presentation of pros and cons of matters to be acted upon. All requests to address the Commission on public hearing items must be submitted prior to the Commission=s consideration of the item. EVERY PERSON WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION MUST COMPLETE A SPEAKER=S REQUEST FORM AND SUBMIT IT TO THE COMMISSION STAFF. In November 2006, the Commission adopted rules regarding written submissions to ensure that it has reasonable and appropriate opportunity to review your materials. The mailing and email addresses, deadlines, page limits, and required numbers of copies for your advance submissions may be found at www.lacity.org/PLN under “FORMS/PROCEDURES”. Day of hearing submissions (15 copies must be provided) are limited to 2 pages plus accompanying photographs, posters, and PowerPoint presentations of 5 minutes or less. Non-complying materials will NOT be distributed to the Commission. The Commission may ADJOURN FOR LUNCH at approximately 12:00 Noon. Any cases not acted upon during the morning session will be considered after lunch. TIME SEGMENTS noted * herein are approximate. Some items may be delayed due to length of discussion of previous items. The Commission may RECONSIDER and alter its action taken on items listed herein at any time during this meeting or during the next regular meeting, in accordance with the Commission Policies and Procedures and provided that the Commission retains jurisdiction over the case. AGENDA are posted for public review in the Main Street lobby of City Hall East, 200 No. Main Street, Los Angeles, California, and are accessible through the Internet World Wide Web at www.lacity.org/PLN. Click the Meetings and Hearings@ quick link. CPC agenda are available under any of the seven service areas. If you challenge these agenda items in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing agendized here, or in written correspondence on these matters delivered to this agency at or prior to the public hearing. The time in which a party may seek judicial review of this determination is governed by California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Under that provision, a petitioner may seek judicial review of any decision of the City pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5, only if the petition for writ of mandate pursuant to that section is filed no th later than the 90 day following the date on which the City=s decision became final. GLOSSARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL TERMS: CEQA - Calif. Environmental Quality Act ND - Negative Declaration EIR - Environmental Impact Report MND - Mitigated Negative Declaration CE - Categorical Exemption 1. DIRECTOR=S REPORT A. Council actions and schedule. B. Other items of interest. C. City Attorney Litigation Status Report – City Attorney’s Office 2. COMMISSION BUSINESS A. Advance Calendar. B. Commission Requests. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD The Commission shall provide an opportunity in open meetings for the public to address it, for a cumulative total of up to thirty (30) minutes, on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission. (This requirement is in addition to any other hearing required or imposed by law.) PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK MUST SUBMIT A SPEAKER=S REQUEST FORM. ALL REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS AND ITEMS OF INTEREST TO THE PUBLIC THAT ARE WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE COMMISSION MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD. Individual testimony within the public comment period shall be limited as follows: (a) For non-agendized matters, up to three (3) minutes per person and up to ten (10) minutes per subject. (b) For agendized matters, up to two (2) minutes per person and up to ten (10) minutes per subject. PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THESE ITEMS WILL BE DEFERRED UNTIL SUCH TIME AS EACH ITEM IS CALLED FOR CONSIDERATION. The Chair of the Commission may allocate the number of speakers per subject, the time allotted each subject, and the time allotted each speaker. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 2 JULY 26, 2007 4. CPC-2006-2423-GPA-ZC Council District: 15 CEQA: ENV-2005-9188-MND Expiration Date: 10-09-07 Plan: South Los Angeles Appeal Status: Appealable to Council Carried over from July 12, 2007. Public Hearing completed on March 02, 2007. th Project Location: 11516-11518 S. Vermont Avenue; 811-145 W. 115 Place Requested Actions: Pursuant to Section 11.5.6 of the Municipal Code, a General Plan Amendment (Periodic Plan Review for Window No. 158, Geographic Area 2) to the South Los Angeles Community Plan from Public Facilities to Medium Residential. Pursuant to Section 12.32 F of the Municipal Code, a Zone Change from R1-1 (One Family Zone) to R3-1 (Multiple Family Zone) Proposed Project: Construction of a four-story (maximum 45 foot high), 42 unit, condominium project consisting of up to three buildings. The project proposes to provide 84 resident parking spaces, 11 guest parking spaces, and two additional parking spaces for a total of 97 parking spaces on the first level of the buildings to be located on an approximately 53,321 square foot site previously occupied by a park and ride facility. (Note: Tentative Tract Map No. 65361 has been filed for condominium purposes and will require a separate notice and hearing before the Advisory Agency at a later date, a vacation of the public alley for access purposes has also been requested). Applicant: Mohamad Purnamdari STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL; APPROVAL OF THE ZONE CHANGE TO R3-1, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. Madhu Kumar, (213) 978-1162 5. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 67490-1A Plan: Central City TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 67491-1A Council District: 9 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 67492-1A Expiration Date: 8-2-07 CEQA: ENV-2006-6998-MND Appeal Status: Further Appealable PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED Project Location: 100, 221, 225, and 237 S. Grand Avenue; 121, 129, and 135 S. Hill Street; 220 and 236 S. Hope Street; 111, 121, 130, 134, 138, 141, 145, 151, and 161 S. Olive st nd Street; 400 and 440 W. 1 Street; 411, 417, 419, 419, 421, 425, 427, 429, and 431 W. 2 Street; and 630 and 635 W. General Thaddeus Kosciuszko Way Requested Action: Appeal, from the entire Deputy Advisory Agency’s approval of : Pursuant to Section 17.03 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (L.A.M.C.), Tentative Tract Map No. 67490 (Parcel Q) to permit a two-master lot subdivision and 19 airspace lots for the construction of a new 400-unit residential condominium, 20% of the total amounts of residential units shall include affordable apartment units as follows: 35% at extremely low and 65% at very low income levels, 284,000 square feet of commercial/retail, and a 275-room hotel with a total of 1,510 parking spaces on a 3.02 net acre site in the C2-4D and R5-4D zones; also, haul route approval; and CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 3 JULY 26, 2007  Pursuant to Section 17.03 of the L.A.M.C., Tentative Tract Map No. 67491 (Parcels W-1 and W- 2) for the merger and re-subdivision of two lots to permit a 2-master lot subdivision and 27 airspace lots for construction of either 1) a new 568-unit residential condominium, 142 affordable apartment units with 50% at very low and 50% at low income levels, 64,000 square feet of commercial/retail, and 681,000 square feet of commercial office with a total of 1,955 parking spaces; or 2) a new 1,048-unit residential condominium, 262 affordable apartment units with 50% at very low and 50% at low income levels, 64,000 square feet of commercial/retail with a total of 2,175 parking spaces on a 3.14 net acre site in the C2-4D and R5-4D zones; also, haul route approval; and Pursuant to Section 17.03 of the L.A.M.C., Tentative Tract Map No. 67492 (Parcels L and M-2) for the merger and re-subdivision of one lot and one portion of a lot to permit a two-master lot subdivision and 13 airspace lots for a new 680-unit residential condominium, 170 affordable apartment units with 50% at very low and 50% at low income levels, and 101,000 square feet of commercial/retail with 1,570 total parking spaces on a 2.20 net acre site in the R5-4D zone; also, haul route approval. Proposed Project: The creation of a 16-acre Civic Park, streetscape improvements along Grand Avenue from Fifth Street to Cesar Chavez Avenue, and development of five parcels for an approximate 3.6 million square foot mixed use development consisting of two development options. Under the County Office Building Option, up to 2,060 residential units, including 412 affordable apartment units; up to 275 hotel rooms; up to 449,000 square feet of retail space; and up to 681,000 square feet of County office space would be constructed with 5,035 parking spaces. Under the Additional Residential Development Option, up to 2,660 residential units, including 532 affordable units; up to 275 hotel rooms; and up to 449,000 square feet of retail space would be constructed with 5,255 parking spaces. The Project will also include an Equivalency Program that will allow the composition of the five development parcels to be modified in a manner that does not increase the project’s impacts on the environment within a framework within which land uses can be exchanged for certain other permitted land uses within and between parcels so long as the limitations of the Equivalency Program are satisfied and no additional environmental impacts occur. All permitted land use increases can also be exchanged for corresponding decreases of other land uses. Applicant: The Related Companies; Beatrice Hsu Representative: Psomas; Jennifer Yakubik Appellant: Christopher Sutton; Today’s IV Inc., dba Westin Bonaventure Hotel STAFF RECOMMENDS DENY THE APPEAL AND SUSTAIN THE DEPUTY ADVISORY AGENCY DECISIONS. Maya Zaitzevsky, (213) 978-1416. 6. VTT-67012-1A Council District: 2 CEQA: ENV-2006-5007-MND Expiration Date: Extended Plan: North Hollywood- Valley Village Appeal Status: Appealable to Council Continued from June 28, 2007. PUBLIC HEARING Project Location: 11933 West Magnolia Boulevard Requested Action: Appeal, from the entire Deputy Advisory Agency’s approval of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 67012. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 4 JULY 26, 2007  Proposed Project: Construction, use and maintenance of a 78-unit condominium complex on a 61,975 net square foot site in the R3-1 and R4-1 zones with 156 resident parking spaces and 39 guest spaces. Applicant: Gary Schaffel, Schaffel Development Representative: Yale Partners, Ltd. Appellant(s): The Valley Village Residents Association; Sandy Hubbard; Chuck Tennan; and Magnolia Tree Villas Homeowers Association Representative : Tom Paterson STAFF RECOMMENDS DENY THE APPEALS; GRANT IN PART TO MODIFIY CONDITIONS. Jack Chiang, (818) 374-5045. 7. CPC-2005-41-CU Council District: 7 CEQA: ENV-2005-0042-MND Expiration Date: 7-26-07 Plan: Mission Hills-Panorama City-North Appeal Status: Appealable to Council Hills Continued from March 22, 2007. Public Hearing completed on October 21, 2005. Project Location: 15031 Rinaldi Street Requested Action: Pursuant to Sections 12.24.T and 12.24.U.12 of the Municipal Code, a Vesting Conditional Use for a Hospital located in an A2-1 (Agricultural) zoned property, and: Pursuant to Section 12.24.F of the Municipal Code, a Conditional Use Modification: of the height regulations to permit a maximum building height of approximately 97 feet in lieu of the maximum 45 feet permitted in the A2-1 Zone pursuant to Section 12.21.1 of the Municipal Code; to permit a side yard of 7 feet in lieu of the required 25 feet in the A2-1 Zone. Proposed Project: Expansion of an existing hospital building by adding a new 136 bed patient tower, 119,570 square feet, four stories plus penthouse, and 97 feet in height. The project will also include a net addition of 390 square feet to the central utility plant, and add 1,068 square feet to a mechanical and utility building. The proposed expansion of the hospital will provide a total of 390 beds and 972 parking spaces on site and on adjacent parcels. Applicant: Waldo T. Romero, Providence Holy Cross Medical Center Representative: Lee Ambers STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. Jim Tokunaga, (213) 978-1309 8. CPC-2006-8999-GPA-ZC-SP-DA Council District: 12 CEQA: October 2006 Addendum to EIR Expiration Date: 10-23-07 NO. 88-0026(SP)(ZC)(DA) Appeal Status: Appealable to Council Plan: Porter Ranch Continued from April 26, 2007. (At its meeting of April 26, the City Planning Commission modified and approved portions of the requested Specific Plan Amendments and the Development Agreement) CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 5 JULY 26, 2007  Public Hearing completed on January 26, 2007. Project Location: 19701 Rinaldi Street Requested Action: Pursuant to Section 11.5.6 of the Municipal Code, a General Plan Amendment (Periodic Plan Review to the Chatsworth-Porter Ranch Community Plan from Very Low II to Low II on 101.5 acres (Proposed Subareas C-1 and D-1); and Pursuant to Section 12.32 of the Municipal Code, a Zone Change from [T]RE-1 (Residential Estate Zone) to (T)RD6-1 (Restricted Density Multiple Dwelling Zone) on approximately 52.5 acres (Proposed Subarea C-1); and Pursuant to Section 11.5.7 G of the Municipal Code, an Amendment to the sections of the Porter Ranch Land Use/Transportation Specific Plan (Ordinance Nos. 175,070 and 175,641): a. (Developments and Improvements to be assured by Development Agreement(s)), Subsections I (Library and Municipal Facilities), J (Community Meeting Facility) and K (Child Care Facility) would be amended to provide that “such facilities can be located on the new K-8 school on at least a 13-acre site as provided for in Section 9 H, and provided that the Los Angeles Unified School District and the City Council have entered into a joint use agreement regarding such site. If no such agreement has been reached prior to the Los Angeles Unified School District breaking ground on the K-8 school site, then the Applicant shall provide these facilities within Subareas I, II, III or IV of the Community Center”. Added Process to Convert Non-residential Floor Area and Transfer of Density b. Section 3 (Definitions) would be amended by revising the definition of Donor Site and Receiver Site, to include “Subareas I, II, or II”, and the definition of Donor Subarea would be amended to include within the Single–Family Area “or Community Center Area” (in addition to Subareas in the Single-Family Area). This will expand the area for which Base Permitted Dwelling Unit density “or density resulting from a conversion of non-residential floor area in the Community Center Area” may be transferred to a Receiver Subarea; c. Section 6.C.4 (transfers of unused floor area from Donor Sites within Subareas I, II and III) would be amended to include such floor area transfers to lots within “Subareas I, and III” in addition to Subarea II; d. Section 11.A.2 (Project Permit Compliance Approvals) would be amended to allow transfers of unused permitted non-residential floor area among “Subareas I, II, and III” of the Community Center Area in addition to Subarea II (corresponding reference to Section 6, Subsection C.4 above); e. Section 7.B.2 (Single-Family Area Regulations) (Density) (caps on dwelling units and density in the Single Family Subarea resulting from density transfers) would be amended to delete the maximum permitted 2,195 total units in the Single Family Area and the maximum 110% base density in any Subarea and allow for the “transfers of density of unused permitted non-residential floor area in the Community Center Area to Subareas of the Single Family Area in addition to the transfers of residential density among Single Family Subareas that are currently permitted under Section 7 B.3.” f. Section 7.B.3 (Director approval of transfers of unused density from Donor Subareas among Single Family Subareas) would also be amended to also provide for the Director’s approval of “transfers of residential density resulting from the conversion of non- residential floor area from a Donor Subarea in the Community Center Area to a Receiver Subarea in the Single Family Area”, “provided that an equivalent reduction is made to the CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 6 JULY 26, 2007  A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Trips and the total permitted non-residential floor area in Subarea II of the Community Center Area.” In addition, Section 11, Subsection A.3 (Project Permit Compliance Approvals) and Section 11, Subsection C.3 (and Paragraph (a) of such Subsection) would be amended to make corresponding references to the transfers of dwelling units resulting from the conversion of non-residential floor area in the Community Center Area. Transfers of dwelling units approved pursuant to the above process are anticipated to occur in Subarea A and in new Subareas C-1 and D-1, which would increase the number of dwelling units in those Subareas from the number specified in the amended Specific Plan. Map and Base Density Modifications for Subareas g. Section 1 (Map) would be amended to revise the Single Family Subarea boundaries to create new Subarea C-1, within a 52.5-acre portion of Subarea C, and new Subarea D-1, within a 49-acre portion of Subarea D. h. Section 7 B 1.(c) and (d) (Density) of would be amended to re-distribute the base permitted density permitted in Subareas C (270 units) and Subarea D (230 units) to permit “60 dwelling units” in Subarea C, “210” dwelling units in Subarea C-1, “60 dwelling units” in Subarea D and “170” dwelling units in Subarea D-1, as the new base permitted density in such subareas. The transfers of dwelling units which may be approved pursuant to the proposed amendments, when added to the base permitted dwelling units, would increase the number of dwelling units in new Subareas C-1 and D-1, in addition to Subarea A, as follows: Subarea A -a total of 325 dwelling units, new Subarea C-1 -a total of 340 dwelling units, and new Subarea D-1 -a total of 190 dwelling units. Use and Development Standards i. Section 7.A.1.(a) (permitted uses) would be amended to provide that new Subarea C-1 may have detached single family dwelling units conforming to the provisions of the RD6 zone, and Section 7.B.1 (base permitted dwelling units) would be amended to except new Subarea C-1 from the requirement for one single family dwelling on a lot, in order to be consistent with RD6 zone provisions. j. Section 7.A.2.(a), (c), and (d) (lot width and area) would be amended to specify that lots in Subarea A would have a minimum width of 50 feet and a minimum area of 6,000 square feet instead of 70 feet and 8,400 square feet, respectively, to refer to new Subarea C-1, and to refer to new Subarea D-1 having a minimum width of 45 feet and a minimum area of 5,000 square feet. k. Section 8.G.2.(b) (Advisory Agency Approvals), (Private Open Space) would be amended to reference the new Single Family Subareas “C-1” and “D-1” in the specified findings. This would require the inclusion of private open space regulations to new subareas C-1 and D-1. l. Section 6 (Community Center Area Regulations), Subsection G.2.(c) (Landscaping, Setback, and Required Walls) would be amended to provide for a setback of “25” feet instead of 40 feet along the north side of Rinaldi Street between Porter Ranch Drive and Mason Avenue. m. Section 6. A.5 (relating to Subarea IV permitted uses) would be amended to add “An additional use of parking shall be permitted within a 2.77 acre portion of Subarea IV located south of Rinaldi Street and east of Porter Ranch Drive on Lot 22 of Tract 52154, provided that such parking use serves a permitted use in Subareas I, IV and V south of Rinaldi Street” to the list of permitted uses in Subarea IV. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 JULY 26, 2007  n. Section 6.A.4 (Permitted Uses) and Section 6.C.2.(c) (Floor Area) would be amended to add “assisted living units for which a Conditional Use or similar approval has been granted under LAMC Section 12.24 W. 38; medical service and office uses; general office uses; and banks,” as permitted uses within Subarea III. This would add to the list of permitted uses within Subarea III allowed floor area; and o. Sections 9 L.1, L.2 and L.4 (Developments and Improvements to be Assured by Development Agreements), (Senior Citizen Housing) and 11.C.6.(a) would be amended to specify senior citizens “as defined by State Law” instead of senior citizens 65 years of age or older in provisions relating to affordable housing and assisted living units for seniors to conform to State law: Administrative clean-up as a result of the above proposed amendments p. Section 6.C.2 would be amended to correct the reference from Paragraph to 5 to Paragraph “4”; q. Section 11 (Project Permit Compliance Approval Procedure), Subsection A.2 would be amended to correctly identify Subareas I, II or III and reference Section 6 C 4; r. Section 11.A.3, C.3, and C.3.(a) would be amended add “and dwelling units resulting from the conversion of non-residential floor area in the Community Center Area” and reference Section 6 C “4 or 6”; and Pursuant to Section 65864-65869.5 of the California Government Code and the City implementing procedures, an amendment to the existing Development Agreement between Porter Ranch Development Company and the City of Los Angeles. The Development Agreement is intended to provide reasonable assurances to the Applicant with respect to their ability to implement proposed Project Approvals, with the Applicant providing the City with certain public benefits. The amendment proposes to change the agreement pertaining to the school site (s), reduced commercial space thresholds for provision of library and other municipal facilities, community meeting facility, child care community meeting facility and community center area senior housing. Proposed Project: The proposed entitlements would permit an additional 242 single-family dwelling units in the Single-Family Area for a total of 2,437 single-family dwelling units and a corresponding reduction of 366,000 square feet of commercial space for a total of 2,927,000 square feet of non-residential floor area in the Community Center Area. The proposal would allow for the development of a larger K-8 school site at an alternate location in Subarea D and establish a process to allow dwelling units converted from a portion of the remaining allowable non- residential floor area in the Community Center Area to be transferred as single-family dwelling units into the remaining Single Family Subareas. The proposal also includes minor changes to implement the transfer mechanism and adjust density and area requirements to accommodate any transferred units. The current Porter Ranch Land Use/ Transportation Specific Plan, permits 2,195 single-family dwellings in the Single Family Area, 1,400 multi-family dwellings in the Community Center Area, and 3,293,000 square feet of non-residential floor area in the Community Center Area which may be converted to residential dwelling units within the same area, based upon a trip equivalency formula and a maximum cap on the A.M. and P.M. peak hour and total trips generated. The Specific Plan currently requires the reservation of a 7-acre parcel at the southeast corner of Sesnon Boulevard and Mason Avenue (in Subarea D) for kindergarten and Elementary school facilities, and the potential purchase by the Los Angeles Unified School District of a 15-acre parcel for a junior high school (in Subarea C). CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 8 JULY 26, 2007  Applicant: Porter Ranch Development Company, Dave Hasson Representative: Tom Stemnock STAFF RECOMMENDS DENY THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT; DENY THE ZONE CHANGE; AND APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN AS MODIFIED. Madhu Kumar, (213) 978-1162. 9. CPC-2007-2978-ICO Council District: 12 CEQA: ENV-2007-2982-CE Expiration Date: N/A Plan: Granada Hills-Knollwood Appeal Status: N/A PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED Project Location: All residentially zoned properties bounded by San Fernando Mission Road on the north, San Jose on the south, Zelzah Avenue on the west, and Amestoy Avenue on the east, with the exception of the corridor along Chatsworth Street from Zelzah on the west to Amestoy on the east, from the alleys that run parallel to Chatsworth on both the north and south. Requested Action: An Interim Control Ordinance (ICO) to temporarily prohibit the issuance of building permits for residential uses within the “Old Granada Hills” area in the Granada Hills- Knollwood Community Plan area. Proposed Project: No project is proposed. Applicant: City of Los Angeles STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED INTERMIN CONTROL ORDINANCE. Anna M. Vidal, (818) 374-5043. 10. CPC-2007-2986-ICO Council District: 2 CEQA: ENV-2007-2987-CE Expiration Date: N/A Plan: Sunland-Tujunga-Shadow Hills- Appeal Status: N/A Lake View Terrace-East La Tuna Canyon PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED Project Location: All single-family residentially zoned properties that are 8,000 square-feet or less that are bounded by Lowell Avenue and the City boundary on the east, the Foothill Freeway on the southwest, the eastern edge of the Big Tujunga Wash on the northwest, and the city boundary on the north. Requested Action: A new Interim Control Ordinance (ICO) to temporarily prohibit the issuance of building and demolition permits for single-family residentially zoned lots that are 8,000 square-feet or less within the “Sunland-Tujunga” area in the Sunland-Tujunga-Shadow Hills-Lake View Terrace-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan area. Proposed Project: No project is proposed. Applicant: City of Los Angeles STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED INTERIM CONTROL ORDINANCE. Anita Cerna, (818) 374-5042. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 9 JULY 26, 2007 11. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION OF PLANNING POLICY AND GOALS The Commission may ADJOURN FOR LUNCH at approximately 12:00 Noon. Any cases not acted upon during the morning session will be considered after lunch. The next regular meeting of the City Planning Commission will be held at 8:30 a.m. on Thursday, August 9, 2007, 200 North Spring Street, Room 1010, City Hall, Los Angeles, California An Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action employer. As a covered entity under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Los Angeles does not discriminate. The meeting facility and its parking are wheelchair accessible. Sign language interpreters, assistive listening devices, or other auxiliary aids and/or other services may be provided upon request. To ensure availability of services, please make your request no later than three working days (72 hours) prior to the meeting by contacting the Commission Executive Assistant at (213) 978-1300 or email to CPC@lacity.org CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 10 JULY 26, 2007