Muyni
← Back to Luray

Town Council

Regular Meeting

Luray, VA · March 9, 2026

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LURAY, VIRGINIA Monday, March 9th, 2026 The Luray Town Council met in regular session on Monday, March 9th, at 7:00 p.m. in the Luray Town Council Chambers located at 45 East Main Street, Luray, Virginia at which time there were present the following: Presiding: Mayor Lillard Council Present: Ron Vickers Ryan Dean Jason Pettit Chuck Butler Council Absent: Jerry Dofflmeyer Joey Sours Also Present: Bryan Chrisman, Town Manager Danielle Babb, Clerk Treasurer Danielle Alger, Deputy Clerk Treasurer Chief Bow Cook, Luray Police Department Lonnie Foster, Luray Police Department Brooke Fox, Planning and Zoning Town Attorney, Jason Botkins, Litten & Sipe Jackie Wood, Luray Downtown Initiative Gina Hilliard, Luray-Page Chamber of Commerce Leslie Currle, Page County Economic Development Authority Powell Markowitz, Luray-Page County Airport Authority Giovannella Frankel, Citizen Comment Dylan Cooper, Citizen Comment A quorum being present, Mayor Lillard declared the Council to be in session for the transaction of business. All present stood for a moment of silence. Mayor Lillard led everyone in the United States Pledge of Allegiance. CONSENT AGENDA Motion: Councilman Vickers motioned to approve the Consent Agenda as presented, motion seconded by Councilman Butler with the vote as follows: YEA: Council Members Vickers, Dean, Pettit, Butler. Approved 4-0 Consent Agenda (A) Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting –02/09/2026 (B) Work Session Minutes- 02/24/2026 (C) Accounts Payable totaling- $166,037.46 (D) Financial Reports for the period ending 02/28/2026 GENERAL CITIZEN COMMENTS Dylan Cooper- 300 Springfield Road, Luray Mr. Cooper stated that he is the Outdoor Columnist for Page Valley News and wanted to address the Lake Arrowhead Swimming Area. Mr. Cooper stated that in the Town’s Comprehension Plan last year, the Town stated they would be adding restrooms, more recreational activities but nothing pertaining to swimming. He added that he is aware of the petition that has been signed by over five hundred people. Giovannella Frankel- 160 Riverbend Drive, Luray Ms. Frankel stated that the petition that she had started has grown quite a bit since last month when she attended the Town Council Meeting. Ms. Frankel stated she had received staff correspondence and was sad to hear there was a negative response from Council. Ms. Frankel stated that she inquired about the cost of lifeguard training and doesn’t understand why the Town can’t pay for the certification. Councilman Vickers stated that the Town went through many efforts to obtain adequate lifeguards but there were no applicants. Mayor Lillard stated that Ms. Frankel could reach out to members after the Council meeting. Mr. Butler explained that the certification required for open water lifeguards is more extensive than pool lifeguards. BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS Luray Downtown Initiative LDI Director, Jackie Wood, stated there were a lot of good things going on with LDI and Downtown Luray. Ms. Wood stated LDI hosted a retreat in February funded by Virginia Mainstreet. She stated that it was an honor to be selected. Ms. Wood thanked everyone for making it a huge success. Ms. Wood stated that 45 directors said that Luray was doing it right and added how good our streets looked. Ms. Wood said there will be several new businesses coming to downtown in the next few months. Ms. Wood stated they were asked to spearhead the VA 250 Flag project. She added that 250 Betsy Ross flags will be going up in the historic district. She added this project will be ready to launch in May. Ms. Wood advised Council Members of a new applicant for the facade grant. Luray-Page Chamber of Commerce Gina Hilliard, stated on January 1st, the Chamber had a new executive committee. Ms. Hilliard said they are thriving with 10 ambassadors and 385 members. Ms. Hillard said they will be celebrating the 100th anniversary of the Chamber this year. She encouraged everyone if they are not a member to join. Ms. Hilliard thanked everyone for coming to the Networking Breakfast. She added there will be many events coming up including the Laurel Ridge job fair, ribbon cuttings, annual banquet and awards and women in business opportunities. Ms. Hilliard stated that Jen Jenkins was the guest speaker for March Tourism Tuesday and thanked the Town for their sponsorship. Page County Economic Development Authority Leslie Currle, stated the housing study is currently under way with a roundtable comprehensive assessment of Page County’s housing needs and what potential housing would look like. She added the feasibility study for public transportation has been completed. Ms. Currle stated discussions are underway to assess future water and sewer costs. She added the meat processing facility continues to move forward in Shenandoah. Ms. Currle also stated there is a short term rental study going around analyzing short term rentals in the County. She added the goal is that short term rentals do not ruin rural neighborhoods. Ms. Currle stated that the EDA meetings are open to the public and meet the fourth Monday of every month. Ms. Currle stated that People Incorporated a non project group supports small businesses and added they were recently awarded Page, Shenandoah , and Warren County funding. She stated there will be quarterly trainings held at the Chamber in March, June and September. She stated there will be funding options for existing businesses. Councilman Vickers inquired about the update on funds for the roundabout. Mayor Lillard stated that she could give an update on that. Ms. Lillard stated the County has 75k set aside to support that project and added the director was out for some time which has caused a delay. Luray-Page County Airport Authority Powell Markowitz with the Airport Authority stated their main accomplishment was closing their USDA loan. Mr. Markowitz stated they were originally borrowing 4.3 million but ended up borrowing 3.9 million. Mr. Markowitz stated they added eighteen hangars and a new terminal building. Mr. Markowitz stated they have fifteen active full-time positions at the Airport and are bringing in more traffic. Mr. Markowitz stated that there will be a new business there which includes an avionics shop. DISCUSSION ITEMS Sommers Alley Vacation Request- 312 N Court Street Town Manager, Bryan Chrisman, requested Council discuss and consider taking action on the requested alley vacation request from: Royce & Irene Sommers 312 North Court Street Mr. Chrisman stated they are requesting vacation of the alley beside their home due to encroachment by their principal structure at 312 N Court Street. Mr. Chrisman stated the situation hasn’t changed much since the last discussion and there were no material changes since the last meeting packet. Council held a Public Hearing and discussed this at their February 9, 2026, meeting. One of the owners, Irene Sommer’s, was present at that Public Hearing and spoke. As noted in the accompanying information, this would be the first step of many required to bring this situation into compliance. As shown on the original and recent survey plat, there has been significant construction at the site without zoning or building permits. The recent survey plat shows that nearly all this additional work over the years encroaches into, and across, the pre-existing alley. Since we have no records of applications for any of this work, we cannot say who owned the property when the various stages of construction occurred. We do know, from the applicants, that they completed the most recent additions. Copies of the request letter, information, and aerials were included for Council’s review. Councilman Butler inquired if the neighboring landowner had been contacted. Mr. Chrisman stated that he was unaware if that had taken place. Mr. Butler stated he doesn’t want to act on this until hearing feedback from the neighboring landowner. Mr. Chrisman stated that a lot of things need to line up prior to making a decision and will reach out to Mr. and Mrs. Sommers and have them reach out to the other property owner. Mr. Vickers inquired if anything has been torn down in the past due to the zoning. Mr. Chrisman stated there was a property in Forest Hills that wasn’t surveyed correctly a few years ago. Mayor Lillard inquired if it could be approved with a contingency until staff hears from the property owners. Town Attorney, Jason Botkins, stated that a boundary line easement or adjustment could be done. Councilman Pettit stated he believes the property owner was misled by previous property owners. Mr. Chrisman stated there is a fourth option as well until they can gather more information. Councilman Pettit stated that he was thinking to deny it. Motion: Councilman Butler motioned to deny the Alley Vacation Request & Ordinance, as presented. Councilman Pettit seconded the motion with the vote as follows: Council Members: YEA: Vickers, Dean, Pettit, Butler. Approved 4-0 County of Page Alley Vacation Request- 215 West Page Street Town Manager, Bryan Chrisman, requested Council discuss and consider taking action on the requested alley vacation request from: County of Page 215 West Page Street Requesting vacation of a portion of the alley beside their property for the construction of a new retaining wall to support 215 West Page Street. Council held a Public Hearing on this issue at their February 9, 2026, meeting. A neighbor spoke against the request due to his access concerns. The general feeling was that the County should consider replacing the current retaining wall where it is currently located. Therefore, a vacation of a part of the alley would not be required. A temporary construction easement could be granted to allow construction while neighboring access would be maintained. The Town postponed action to await a Site Plan from the County. Additionally, the alley property pins and/or line were to be survey-marked in the field. ACTION ITEMS Sign Ordinance Amendments Town Manager, Bryan Chrisman, requested Council consider adopting the proposed sign ordinance amendments. These changes have been proposed by Town staff and formulated by the Town Attorney. A copy of the latest proposed Ordinance and Exhibit are included for review. Principal elements of the proposed amendments include, but are not limited to: Reducing the size and scope of the Ordinance Increasing the type of signs allowed without a permit Increasing the size and/or number of certain allowable sign types Consolidating several sections of the Ordinance Eliminating unneeded portions of the previous Ordinance Ensuring conformity with applicable state codes Simplifying the Ordinance for use by customers and staff Council held a Public Hearing on this topic at their February 9, 2026, regular meeting. No action was taken since the Council was awaiting a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Motion: Councilman Vickers motioned the Sign Ordinance Amendments be approved, as presented. Councilman Butler seconded the motion with the vote as follows: YEA: Council Members Vickers, Dean, Pettit, Butler Approved 4-0 TOWN ATTORNEY’S REPORT Civil Penalties for Zoning Ordinance Violations Town Attorney, Jason Botkins, stated that Zoning Ordinances have traditionally been enforced by prosecuting violations as crimes. Mr. Botkins stated there is a general reluctance by Courts to impose a criminal penalty for violating a zoning ordinance. This usually results in numerous continuances spanning a significant time-period, sometimes years, to provide the owner with every opportunity to comply. The process and outcome are often unsatisfactory due to the time and cost involved to abate a violation. Mr. Botkins stated the service of process is also an issue for owners that live outside of Virginia because it requires cooperation by non-Virginia law enforcement to obtain personal service. The Virginia Code 15.2-2209 authorizes a civil penalty that replaces the criminal penalty for violating a zoning ordinance. The ceilings on the penalties are: • $200 for first violation. • $1,000 for the second violation. • $1,500 for a third or subsequent violation. • A total of $4,200 for all violations within a 12-month period. Civil penalties totaling $5,000 or more may still be prosecuted as a criminal misdemeanor. The summary process was provided in this evening’s council packet. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Vickers suggested an idea for a better budget. Mr. Vickers stated that if part time employees do not receive health insurance coverage, then Council Members shouldn’t receive that benefit. Mr. Vickers believes this should be considered as a cost savings method. MAYOR’S ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Lillard reminded everyone there will be no work session for March. ADJOURN With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:21 p.m. _____________________________ Stephanie Lillard Mayor _________________________ Danielle Alger Deputy Clerk-Treasurer

Agenda

LURAY TOWN COUNCIL March 9, 2026 - 7:00 p.m. REGULAR MEETING AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER & PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE U.S. FLAG Mayor Lillard II. ROLL CALL Danielle Alger III. AGENDA ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS Mayor Lillard IV. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Lillard V. GENERAL CITIZEN COMMENTS (other than agenda items) VI. COUNCIL RESPONSE VII. BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS A) Luray Downtown Initiative Jackie Wood B) Chamber of Commerce Gina Hilliard C) Page County Economic Development Authority Leslie Currle D) Luray-Page County Airport Authority Powell Markowitz VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS Mayor & Council IX. DISCUSSION ITEMS Mayor & Council A) Sommers Alley Vacation Request - 312 N. Court Street B) County of Page Alley Vacation Request – 215 West Page Street X. ACTION ITEMS Mayor & Council A) Sign Ordinance Amendments XI. TOWN ATTORNEY’S REPORT Jason Botkins A) Civil Penalties XII. COUNCIL COMMENTS Town Council XIII. MAYOR’S ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Lillard XIV. ADJOURN Mayor Lillard The meeting will be live streamed on the Town’s website. Please submit any public comments concerning the agenda items through any of the following means: Attendance at meeting; Email – bchrisman@townofluray.com; Mail – Luray Town Council, Attention Bryan Chrisman, Post Office Box 629, Luray VA, 22835; Hand Delivery – Place in exterior DROP BOX in the alcove located at the front of the Town’s Town Hall facing Main Street; or Phone – (540) 743-5511. All comments must be submitted by 12 noon on the day of the meeting and will be read aloud at the meeting. Town of Luray PO Box 629 45 East Main Street Luray, VA 22835 www.townofluray.com 540.743.5511 Mayor Stephanie Lillard slillard@townofluray.com Term: 2025-2028 Council Members Jason Pettit Ryan Dean jpettit@townofluray.com rdean@townofluray.com Term: 2025-2028 Term: 2023-2026 Joey Sours Jerry Dofflemyer jfsours@townofluray.com jdofflemyer@townofluray.com Term: 2025-2028 Term: 2025-2026 Chuck Butler Ron Vickers, Vice Mayor cbutler@townofluray.com rvickers@townofluray.com Term: 2025-2028 Term: 2023-2026 Town Officials: Commissions & Committees: Town Manager – Bryan Chrisman Luray Planning Commission Assistant Town Manager- Vacant Luray-Page County Airport Commission Planning & Zoning Technician – Brooke Fox Luray Tree and Beautification Committee Town Clerk/ Treasurer- Danielle Babb Luray Board of Zoning Appeals Deputy Town Clerk/ Treasurer- Danielle Alger Luray Downtown Initiative Chief of Police- Bow Cook Luray-Page County Chamber of Commerce Superintendent of Public Works- Lynn Mathews Superintendent Parks & Recreation-Jennifer Jenkins Superintendent of the WTP – Joey Haddock Superintendent of the WWTP – John Sonifrank February 24, 2026 Town of Luray, Virginia Item No: III Town Council Agenda Statement Meeting Date: March 9, 2026 Agenda Item: ADDITION TO OR DELETION FROM THE AGENDA Suggested Motion: (If required) I move that the Town Council add Agenda Item __ to the agenda regarding __________________________________________________________________. OR I move that the Town Council delete Agenda Item __ from the agenda regarding _______________________________________ for the reason of ______________. OR I move that the Town Council move Agenda Item ____ to a location on the Agenda following Agenda Item ____. TOWN OF LURAY Town Council Regular Meeting March 9, 2026 Consent Agenda IV. Town of Luray, Virginia Item No: IV Town Council Agenda Statement Meeting Date: March 9, 2026 Agenda Item: CONSENT AGENDA I move to approve the following Consent Agenda (all items must be read): (A) Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting – 02/09/2026 (B) Work Session Minutes- 02/24/2026 (C) Accounts Payable Totaling - $ 166,037.46 (D) Financial Reports for the period ending- 02/28/2026 Prepared By: ______________________________ Danielle P. Babb, Treasurer A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LURAY, VIRGINIA Monday, February 9th, 2026 The Luray Town Council met in regular session on Monday, February 9th, at 7:00 p.m. in the Luray Town Council Chambers located at 45 East Main Street, Luray, Virginia at which time there were present the following: Presiding: Mayor Lillard Council Present: Ron Vickers Jerry Dofflemyer Ryan Dean Jason Pettit Joey Sours (via phone) Chuck Butler Also Present: Bryan Chrisman, Town Manager Michael Coffelt, Assistant Town Manager Danielle Babb, Clerk Treasurer Danielle Alger, Deputy Clerk Treasurer Chief Bow Cook, Luray Police Department Brooke Fox, Planning and Zoning Town Attorney, Jason Botkins, Litten & Sipe Tyler Austin, 4304 Millcreek Road, Luray Giovannella Frankel, 160 Riverbend Road, Luray John Coleman, 8 Luray Avenue, Luray Susan Corbett, 397 Riverbend Road, Stanley Irene Sommers, 26 Stover Street, Luray Scott Alger, 115 S Bank Street, Luray (This meeting was made public via the Town’s Facebook page. Public comments were accepted prior to the meeting via e-mail to bchrisman@townofluray.com). A quorum being present, Mayor Lillard declared the Council to be in session for the transaction of business. All present stood for a moment of silence. Mayor Lillard led everyone in the United States Pledge of Allegiance. CONSENT AGENDA Motion: Councilman Vickers motioned to approve the Consent Agenda as presented, motion seconded by Councilman Butler with the vote as follows: YEA: Council Members Vickers, Dofflemyer, Dean, Sours, Pettit, Butler. Approved 6-0 Consent Agenda (A) Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting –01/12/2026 (B) Work Session Minutes- 01/27/2026 (C) Accounts Payable totaling- $282,469.28 (D) Financial Reports for the period ending 01/31/2026 GENERAL CITIZEN COMMENTS Susan Corbett- 397 Riverbend Road, Stanley Ms. Corbett thanked the Town Crew for doing a good job with the snow removal. Ms. Corbett stated that she is working with Liz Lewis amongst a few other ladies in getting the Farmer’s Market up and running. She said her plan is to be open every Saturday. She added that her goal is to have many vendors and she will be attending a grower’s meeting to see who will be committing their produce for the market. Ms. Corbett stated that she is very concerned about the empty buildings on Main Street. Ms. Corbett believes the Town can do something about these derelict buildings. Ms. Corbett stated that it doesn’t look good to visitors to see empty buildings. Giovannella Frankel- 160 Riverbend Drive, Luray Ms. Frankel stated that she has started a petition to re-open Lake Arrowhead and has close to five hundred signatures. Ms. Frankel believes that the Town should be adding things to Luray not taking them away. Ms. Frankel believes this would be a way for kids to have a summer job and stay out of trouble. Ms. Frankel left the petition for Council to review. Tyler Austin- 434 Millcreek Road, Luray Mr. Austin stated that he wanted to piggyback off what Ms. Corbett stated about the derelict buildings. Mr. Austin stated that being a structural engineer, he evaluates things like this all of the time. He stated that buildings are becoming more valuable and believes the Town could exercise a vacancy tax. BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS Luray Downtown Initiative Town Manager, Bryan Chrisman, stated that LDI Director Jackie Wood apologized but was under the weather and couldn’t be here this evening. Mr. Chrisman advised that the State and National reports have been completed. Mr. Chrisman added that the Virginia Main Street Conference was a huge success and visitors had great things to say about our Town. PUBLIC HEARINGS Alley Vacation Requests Town Manager, Bryan Chrisman, stated that Council is requested to conduct Public Hearings to receive citizen input and to consider the requested alley vacation requests from: Royce & Irene Sommers 312 North Court Street 541 West Main Holdings, LLC 541 West Main Street County of Page 215 West Page Street 312 North Court Street Mr. and Mrs. Sommers are requested vacation of the alley beside their home due to encroachment by their principal structure at 312 N. Court Street. Mayor Lillard opened the Public Hearing. Hearing none, Mayor Lillard closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Dofflemyer stated this request is complicated and inquired if Mr. and Mrs. Sommers had spoken with the neighboring property. Mr. Chrisman stated that he doesn’t believe they have spoken with the neighboring property. Ms. Sommers stated that she is aware that it is a complicated situation. She stated the reason for the request is because she and her husband have lived there for twenty-six years and maintained the alley. Ms. Sommers stated that she would be in agreement with the Town using it and is asking for leniency. Councilman Butler stated that if the Town completely vacates it that it still wouldn’t help the problem. Ms. Sommers stated that she is willing to see what the neighbors would do. Mr. Chrisman stated that Council does not have to take action tonight and could defer until a later date. 541 West Main Street Town Manager, Bryan Chrisman, stated that 541 West Main Holdings, LLC requests vacation of the alley beside and behind their proposed business for continued use as gravel parking and access at 541 West Page Street. Mayor Lillard opened the Public Hearing. Hearing none, Mayor Lillard closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Pettit stated that area has been used by the previous owner and that it’s a common space for the operation of that piece of property. John Coleman, 8 Luray Avenue, inquired if the Town was going to provide an easement to use it. Town Attorney, Jason Botkins stated that the Town would vacate with interest to both alleys. Councilman Pettit inquired about the utilities. Mr. Chrisman stated the Town would obtain their rights on southern and western boundaries for water, sewer, storm water and future lines. He added the Town could install a bigger line if no one builds and give that area more pressure. 215 West Page Street Town Manager, Bryan Chrisman, stated the County of Page is requesting vacation of a portion of the alley beside their property for the construction of a new retaining wall to support 215 West Page Street. Mayor Lillard opened the Public Hearing. Scott Alger, 115 S Bank Street, stated that there is only room for one vehicle to drive through. Mr. Alger stated that surveyors had come to look at this situation. Mr. Alger stated that the Town should be aware of the run-off and that it will wash out. He added that there were issues in the past and that it’s just not wide enough. Mr. Alger also stated that he had been to Council and requested the alleyway fifteen years ago for himself and was told no. Mayor Lillard closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Pettit stated that he had been by the property and stated that it is extremely narrow. Mr. Alger stated that he has been taking care of this property for twenty-three years and has gotten three loads of gravel from the Town, the rest he was doing himself. Councilman Butler also stated that he had went by the property and that it is not wide at all and can’t imagine them narrowing it anymore. Councilman Dofflemyer inquired if Mr. Alger had contacted the County. Mr. Alger stated that he is still waiting for a call back. He added that he had heard two different things. He stated that he was told it could be for a parking lot and then he also heard that the Maintenance Department was going to use the building. Mr. Alger stated that he doesn’t care what they do, he just needs his driveway. Councilman Dofflemyer inquired if the building is salvageable. Mr. Alger stated yes but does need repairs. He added that it is a historical building. Councilman Pettit inquired if the County were to do the construction process would it be possible to encroach during the construction. Councilman Dean stated that if they start this project, Mr. Alger wouldn’t be able to get to his house. Mayor Lillard inquired if Council wanted to delay action until the receive feedback from the County. Councilman Dofflemyer asked Ms. Sommers if she would prefer this be put off for a month or so. Ms. Somers stated that she’d prefer not to but would do what was best. Motion: Councilman Pettit motioned to approve the request at 541 W Main Street as presented. Councilman Dofflemyer seconded the motion with the vote as follows: YEA: Council Members Vickers, Dofflemyer, Dean, Pettit, Sours Butler. Approved 6-0 Motion: Councilman Butler motioned to table 312 N Court and 215 W Page Street until next month. Councilman Pettit seconded the motion with the vote as follows: YEA: Council Members Vickers, Dofflemyer, Dean, Pettit, Sours, Butler. Approved 6-0 FY26 Budget Amendment Town Manager, Bryan Chrisman, requested Council conduct a Public Hearing to receive citizen input and to consider the enclosed amendments to the FY26 budget in the amounts specified. These amendments include: Amending General Fund revenues to reflect receipt of $1,000,000 to reflect grant funds awarded by the Virginia Department of Housing & Community Development. Amending General Fund expenditures to reflect spending $1,000,000 of Virginia DHCD grant/loan funds. General Fund expenditures will increase for: Parks & Recreation- $16,900 for the Cave Pond Pump system replacement General Fund/Water Fund/Sewer Fund expenditures will increase for: Public Works- $16,500 for an HVAC system replacement (1/3 each of General, Water, and Sewer) General Fund revenues will increase by $22,400 from reserve funds Water Fund revenues will increase by $5,500 from reserve funds Sewer Fund revenues will increase by $5,500 from reserve funds Sewer Fund expenditures will increase for: Wastewater Treatment Plant-$187,000 for critical equipment replacement Wastewater Treatment Plant-$166,000 for a Preliminary Engineering Report Sewer Fund revenues will increase by $353,000 from reserve funds Mayor Lillard opened the Public Hearing. Hearing none, Mayor Lillard closed the Public Hearing. Mayor Lillard stated that there has been much discussion over these items and have been brought forward prior to tonight’s meeting. Motion: Councilman Vickers motioned to adopt the FY26 Budget Amendments Ordinance as presented. Councilman Butler seconded the motion with the vote as follows: Council Members Vickers, Dofflemyer, Dean, Pettit, Sours, Butler. Approved 6-0 Sign Ordinance Amendments Town Manager, Bryan Chrisman, requested Council conduct a Public Hearing to receive citizen input and to discuss proposed amendments to the Sign Ordinance. Principal elements of the proposed amendments include, but are not limited to: Reducing the size and scope of the Ordinance Increasing the type of signs allowed with a permit Increasing the size and/or number of certain allowable sign types Consolidating several sections of the Ordinance Eliminating unneeded portions of the previous ordinance Ensuring conformity with applicable state codes Simplifying the Ordinance for use by customers and staff Mr. Chrisman stated that there will be no action tonight and will need to await recommendation from the Planning Commission. Mayor Lillard opened the Public Hearing. John Coleman, 8 Luray Avenue, stated that he had a few questions and would like clarification on a few things. Mr. Coleman inquired if someone puts up a flag and takes it down, will they need to wait sixty days before putting the flag back up. Mr. Coleman also inquired about the M1/B1 zoning districts. Mr. Coleman stated that he’s curious about the logic of the sign’s square footage. He added that he’s under the impression that M1 tends to not be traveled very much by the public and it would seem logical that the square footage sign on an Industrial facility that has visitors would need a smaller sign and B1 would rely on a larger sign. Mr. Coleman stated that he would like to see them swapped. He would like to see a decrease for M1 and increase for B1. Mr. Chrisman stated that this would have to be reviewed. Mr. Coleman stated that he’s in no hurry but would appreciate clarification. Mr. Coleman also inquired about the sign illumination. He stated the Ordinance suggests that if there is a lot in M1 or B1 used a residence that the business couldn’t have a sign. Mr. Chrisman stated that has occurred twice that a business wasn’t able to have a sign because it was closer to one hundred feet. Mr. Coleman inquired why the Town would allow a residential unit in a business district. Mr. Chrisman stated that it predated the ordinance. Mr. Coleman would like Council and Planning Commission to revisit this. Councilman Butler thanked staff and Jason Botkins for thorough review of this Ordinance Amendment. Mr. Butler added that he is always encouraged when we can reduce an Ordinance to make it a little less complicated. Councilman Pettit inquired about projecting signs and that we have many in the Downtown area. He stated that it mentioned wall signs but didn’t sound like it’s a projecting sign. Councilman Pettit added that it doesn’t look like projecting signs are covered and in part where it says non permitted. Mr. Chrisman stated that it would be reviewed. Mr. Chrisman stated that if time allows, he plans on trying to have this before Planning Commission next month. Mayor Lillard closed the Public Hearing. ACTION ITEMS Acceptance of DHCD IR Funds- 15 Campbell Street Town Manager, Bryan Chrisman, requested Council consider accepting the Industrial Revitalization Funds from the IRF Grant/Loan program with the Virginia Department of Housing & Community Development. Mr. Chrisman stated that a specific Council Motion and Action is needed. Mr. Chrisman stated that he’s reviewing documents now. He added that he has an upcoming meeting with Mr. Herman and will submit to HUB for their final approval. Mr. Chrisman stated that it may be the March meeting before the final documents arrive. Mr. Chrisman stated this was a twenty-year commitment between the Town and HUB Development, LLC. Principal loan funds repaid to the Town are required to be used for similar Industrial Revitalization projects. Loan interest can be used by the Town as it sees fit. Mr. Chrisman added the projected construction period is twelve to eighteen months. Motion: Councilman Dofflemyer motioned to accept the Funds from DHCD for the IRF Grant/Loan Program as presented. Motion seconded by Councilman Butler with the vote as follows: YEA: Council Members Vickers, Dofflemyer, Dean, Pettit, Sours, Butler. Approved 6-0 BZA Nomination Town Manager, Bryan Chrisman requested Council consider a nomination for a Town Citizen to serve on the Luray Board of Zoning Appeals. Councilman Dean submitted a nomination to fill the unexpired term of Richard M. “Rick” Black who moved outside of the Luray corporate limits and therefore was ineligible to continue serving. Mr. Black was originally appointed by former Councilman Alex White. Councilman Dean proposed Ralph Steven “Steve” Davis. Mr. Davis lives at 18 Wallace Avenue in Luray. He has a B.S. in Engineering from Virginia Tech. He worked for the U.S. Bureau of Printing & Engraving for over thirty years. He has since retired back to Luray. Motion: Councilman Dean motioned Council recommend that Ralph Steven “Steve” Davis be appointed to the BZA for a term commencing upon his appointment and qualification and expiring on June 30, 2030, be approved, as presented. Motion seconded by Councilman Pettit with the vote as follows: YEA: Council Members Vickers, Dofflemyer, Dean, Pettit, Sours, Butler. Approved 6-0 ~Recess~ CLOSED SESSION Discussion of the Performance and Employment of Specific Local Government Personnel – The Town Manager, Town Attorney and Town Clerk/Treasurer Town Council conducted a Closed Meeting for the discussion and consideration of specific local government personnel/appointees, and to discuss the performance and employment of said personnel/appointees, as authorized by Section 2.2-3711 (A)(1) of the Code of Virginia. The subject matter is the performance and employment of the Town Manager, Town Attorney, and Town Clerk/Treasurer. Motion: Councilman Pettit motioned to convene and go into Closed Meeting for discussion and consideration of specific local government personnel/appointees, and to discuss the performance and employment of said personnel/appointees as authorized by Section 2.2-3711 (A)(1) of the Code of Virginia. The subject matter is the performance and employment of the Town Manager, Town Attorney, and Town Clerk/Treasurer. Motion seconded by Councilman Butler with the vote as follows: YEA: Council Members Vickers, Dofflemyer, Dean, Pettit, Sours, Butler. Approved 6-0 ~Closed Meeting~ Motion: Councilman Pettit motioned the closed meeting be adjourned and the Luray Town Council reconvene in open session. Motion seconded by Councilman Dofflemyer with the vote as follows: Council Members Vickers, Dofflemyer, Dean, Pettit, Sours, Butler. Approved 6-0 Certification: Councilman Pettit asked members of Council with respect to the just-completed closed session and to the best of each member’s knowledge, only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, and only such public business matters as were identified in the motion by which the closed meeting was convened were heard discussed or considered in the meeting by the Town Council. Motion seconded by Councilman Dofflemyer with the vote as follows: YEA: Council Members Vickers, Dofflemyer, Dean, Pettit, Sours, Butler. Approved 6-0 TOWN ATTORNEY’S REPORT Mr. Botkins had nothing further this evening. COUNCIL COMMENTS Nothing further this evening. MAYOR’S ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Lillard reminded everyone that the Town Office will be closed on President’s Day. ADJOURN With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:02 p.m. _____________________________ Stephanie Lillard Mayor _________________________ Danielle Alger Deputy Clerk-Treasurer WORK SESSION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LURAY, VIRGINIA Monday, February 24th, 2026 The Luray Town Council met in work session on Tuesday, February 24th, at 5:30 p.m. in the Luray Town Council Chambers located at 45 East Main Street, Luray, Virginia at which time there were present the following: Presiding: Mayor Lillard Council Present: Ron Vickers Jerry Dofflemyer Jason Pettit Joey Sours Chuck Butler Council Absent: Ryan Dean Also Present: Bryan Chrisman, Town Manager Danielle Babb, Clerk Treasurer Danielle Alger, Deputy Clerk Treasurer Chief Bow Cook, Luray Police Department Brooke Fox, Planning and Zoning Jen Jenkins, Superintendent, Parks and Recreation (This meeting was made public via the Town’s Facebook page. Public comments were accepted prior to the meeting via e-mail to bchrisman@townofluray.com). A quorum being present, Mayor Lillard declared the Council to be in session for the transaction of business. All present stood for a moment of silence. Mayor Lillard led everyone in the United States Pledge of Allegiance. UPDATES AND DISCUSSION ITEMS Parks & Recreation Community Survey Jen Jenkins, Parks and Recreation Superintendent, briefed Council on their updated Master Plan survey. Ms. Jenkins stated that a favorable response was received and provided Council with a summary of the results. Ms. Jenkins stated that respondents were able to choose five options and an option to do a write in. Ms. Jenkins provided to Council the top twelve on the list. Most of these were also on the old master plan. Ms. Jenkins stated that Racey Engineering is in the process of updating backgrounds and mapping from the old plan as well as results from the new plan. Ms. Jenkins hopes to have a draft for the next meeting. Ms. Jenkins would like feedback from Council on whether she should do a follow-up survey and is happy to hear thoughts and suggestions. Councilman Pettit thanked Ms. Jenkins on her work on the survey but didn’t think there was enough response on the first survey to produce a second survey. Ms. Jenkins stated that it was advertised at the Recreation Park, Facebook Page, and went out in the utility bills. Councilman Pettit stated that only a small amount of people felt it important to respond to the survey. Councilman Sours stated that Town Hall would be a good place for citizens to pick up a survey. Councilman Pettit stated if it would’ve been at least twenty percent, he would be for a second survey. Ms. Jenkins inquired what Council suggested as what to put on the Master Plan, an outdoor or indoor aquatic center. Ms. Jenkins added that she wants to be prepared in the future and feel confident at funding options on the items on the Master Plan. Mayor Lillard thanked Ms. Jenkins and stated that it was a good place to start. Mr. Chrisman indicated that we would complete the Master Plan update with non-specific space allocations and not complete a second survey. Draft Amendments to Chapter 98 - Parks Jen Jenkins, Parks and Recreation Superintendent, discussed proposed changes to the Chapter 98 ordinance. These proposed changes are designed to better reflect current operations and needs. Ms. Jenkins would like Council feedback related to the proposed changes and give input on potential additions or modifications. Mayor Lillard inquired about electric scooters on the greenway. Police Chief, Bow Cook, stated that he has seen them on the greenway and are typically very courteous. He added that it’s a tough decision because bicycles go fast as well. Ms. Jenkins went through the different changes in the ordinance and provided these in the council packet for Council’s review. Ms. Jenkins and Council discussed these updates. Ms. Jenkins will forward all recommendations/changes/comments to Town Attorney, Jason Botkins. Ruffner Plaza Wall Mural (Pence) Jen Jenkins, Parks and Recreation Superintendent, stated that the Ruffner Plaza Wall Mural proposed by Leah Pence has been reviewed and recommended with monetary support from the Tree & Beautification Committee by Artist Gary Grant. The agreement has been signed, and a copy was provided in tonight’s Council Packet. Councilman Butler inquired about who decides the artwork for the mural. Mr. Chrisman stated the Tree & Beautification Committee reviews and sends to Council then it moves forward from there. Councilman Vickers inquired about the Parks and Recreation employees. Ms. Jenkins stated they have a full-time staff with no turnover. She added they do have part-time/seasonal positions posted. Ms. Jenkins stated they are in need of three to four seasonal park attendants for mowing, weed eating and trash pick-up. Councilman Vickers also inquired if they were able to utilize the trustees. Ms. Jenkins stated that it had been years since they were able to do that. Councilman Vickers stated that everything looks nice and added that she has a good crew. Mayor Lillard thanked Ms. Jenkins and her staff. Council had no objections to the concept, or lease agreement. FY27 Budget Priorities Town Manager, Bryan Chrisman, gave an update on the Town’s budget priorities. Mr. Chrisman stated they are trying local rate proposals to the Consumer Price Index and are looking at a few scenarios and percentages. Mr. Chrisman stated they are looking at a tiered COLA where the lower employees get the higher percentage, and the higher employees get the lower percentage. Mr. Chrisman stated he is working with department heads on their operational budget drafts. Mr. Chrisman added that Construction in Progress (CIP’s) are important because they need prior authorization. Treasurer, Danielle Babb, touched on a few things as well. Ms. Babb stated that she had received sample reports from the Commissioner’s Office that indicate a forty percent increase in taxable values. Ms. Babb stated that a decision will need to be made on the tax rate. Ms. Babb provided a sample copy for the Public Hearing. She also added that she could provide this to Council in their weekly report. Mr. Chrisman stated that the April 13th meeting is the latest for the tax rate. Ms. Babb touched on other revenue items. She added the Meals Tax is trending well ahead of what was projected in the current fiscal year. Ms. Babb stated that several new restaurants will be opening downtown, economically things are going well. Ms. Babb stated that the Lodging Tax is also doing good and trending well. Ms. Babb stated there was a seven percent increase in health insurance. Ms. Babb added there hasn’t been an increase since 2023, which is unheard of. Ms. Babb stated she has reached out to other localities, and they are seeing similar increases. Mr. Chrisman added the draft will be at the March 24th work session and must be a balanced budget. Mr. Chrisman stated the sooner they get the information the easier it will be moving into the schedule. Ms. Babb stated that overall, the departments have been very conservative in their requests. Ms. Babb made Council aware that increases in water and sewer rates are driven by infrastructure costs. Councilman Pettit inquired about what the reserve looked like. He stated that in the first three years it wasn’t touched while he was on Council but for the last two years, we had to use some of the reserves. Ms. Babb stated the Town is doing fine with the reserves. Ms. Babb added she is capitalizing on peak cash flow and money market interest. Mayor Lillard inquired about the bank franchise tax allocations. Ms. Babb stated that she should get those reports in about a month and they are usually the last thing to come in for the budget. ~Recess~ CLOSED SESSION Discussion of the Hiring or Appointment of Specific Local Government Personnel- the Assistant Town Manager, the Chief of Police, and the Superintendent of Public Works Town Council conducted a Closed Meeting for the discussion and consideration of specific local government personnel, and to discuss the hiring or appointment of said personnel, as authorized by Section 2.2-3711 (A)(1) of the Code of Virginia. The subject matter is the hiring or appointment of the Assistant Town Manager, the Chief of Police, and the Superintendent of Public Works. Motion: Councilman Pettit motioned to convene and go into Closed Meeting for discussion and consideration of specific local government personnel, and to discuss the hiring or appointment of said personnel, as authorized by Section 2.2-3711 (A)(1) of the Code of Virginia. The subject matter is the performance and employment of the Town Manager, the Chief of Police, and the Superintendent of Public Works. Motion seconded by Councilman Sours with the vote as follows: YEA: Council Members Vickers, Dofflemyer, Pettit, Sours, Butler. Approved 5-0 ~Closed Meeting~ Motion: Councilman Pettit motioned the closed meeting be adjourned and the Luray Town Council reconvene in open session. Motion seconded by Councilman Sours with the vote as follows: Council Members Vickers, Dofflemyer, Pettit, Sours, Butler. Approved 5-0 Certification: Councilman Pettit asked members of Council with respect to the just-completed closed session and to the best of each member’s knowledge, only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, and only such public business matters as were identified in the motion by which the closed meeting was convened were heard discussed or considered in the meeting by the Town Council. Motion seconded by Councilman Butler with the vote as follows: YEA: Council Members Vickers, Dofflemyer, Pettit, Sours, Butler. Approved 5-0 ADJOURN With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:55 p.m. _____________________________ Stephanie Lillard Mayor _________________________ Danielle Alger Deputy Clerk-Treasurer TOWN OF LURAY Town Council Regular Meeting March 9, 2026 Discussion Items IXA. Sommers Alley Vacation Request – 312 N. Court St. Town of Luray, Virginia Item No: IX-A Town Council Agenda Statement Meeting Date: March 9, 2026 Agenda Item: TOWN COUNCIL DISCUSSION & POTENTIAL ACTION Item IX-A – Alley Vacation Request Summary: The Town Council is requested to discuss and consider taking action on the requested alley vacation request from: Royce & Irene Sommers 312 North Court Street Requesting vacation of the alley beside their home due to encroachment by their principal structure at 312 N. Court Street Copies of the request letter, information, and aerials are included for review. Council held a Public Hearing and discussed this at their February 9, 2026, meeting. One of the owners, Irene Sommer’s, was present at that Public Hearing and spoke. As noted in the accompanying information, this would be the first step of many required to bring this situation into compliance. As shown on the original and recent survey plat, there has been significant construction at the site without zoning or building permits. The recent survey plat shows that nearly all of this additional work over the years encroaches into, and across, the pre-existing alley. Since we have no records of applications for any of this work, we cannot say who owned the property when the various stages of construction occurred. We do know, from the applicants, that they completed the most recent additions. Commission Review: N/A Fiscal Impact: N/A Suggested Motions: I move that the Alley Vacation Request & Ordinance be approved, as presented. OR I move that the Alley Vacation Request & Ordinance be approved with the following changes____________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ OR I move that Alley Vacation Request & Ordinance be denied for the following reasons____________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ Agenda Item 9A – Alley Vacation Request March 9, 2026 Supplemental Report 312 North Court Street This alley vacation is the first step (of several) in an attempt by the owners to bring their construction situation into compliance with current Town and County ordinances. Apparently, the principal structure has been added onto multiple times over the years. Only one project, the remodeling of the screen porch at the south end of the structure (opposite from the alley) received a Building Permit. The addition of several other structures or extensions, and the enclosing of those structures, have been completed without zoning approval from the Town and without building/construction permits from the County. As a result, some of the improvements extend across the adjacent alley and encroach onto the parcels across the alley. If this alley vacation is granted, the applicants will then need to acquire a quit claim from the owners of Parcels 25A and 25B for any interest they may have in the alley and an easement, lease, or boundary line adjustment for the portions of the adjoining parcels being encroached upon. If those are granted, then the applicants can continue with an appeal to the Town Board of Zoning Appeals to reduce the required side setback to zero feet. Then, and only then, can the Town consider whether to allow the past construction retroactively. Such construction would still need to obtain approvals from the Page County Building Official. There are no known public utilities in the alley. There is a water pipe installed that is connected to an underground tank on parcel 42A3-5-F-25A (to the north). This tank once served as the fire suppression “elevated” tank for the former Wrangler Annex on North Hawksbill Street. That owner still owns parcel 25A, but with the extension of a larger waterline to the Annex many years ago, the elevated tank was no longer needed. Parcel 25B is an old cemetery with no known ownership. The current construction effectively blocks the use of the alley for access of any kind. Failure to obtain any of these approvals would result in the owners being required to demolish the encroaching construction. Even if the construction is allowable, it still must meet Building Code requirements. If not, it may have to be renovated or removed and rebuilt. Earlier comments by the Building Office indicate that the newly built car port does not have viable foundations or attachment points. The Town should retain future access, storm water, and utility rights in the event that the alley can be utilized at some point in the future. Ordinance No. 2026-__ AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE TOWN OF LURAY, VIRGINIA THIS ORDINANCE is enacted on the 9th day of March, 2026, by the Council of the TOWN OF LURAY, VIRGINIA, a Virginia municipal corporation (index as “Grantor”) upon the application of ROYCE W. SOMMERS and IRENE M. SOMMERS (index each as “Grantee”). WHEREAS, there exists a certain unimproved public right-of-way (the “Alley”) within the Town of Luray running from North Court Street to North Bank Street between the parcels on North Court Street identified as Tax Map No. 42A3-5-F-26 and Tax Map No. 42A3-5-F-25A; and WHEREAS, Royce W. Sommers and Irene M. Sommers are the owners of the parcel identified as Tax Map No. 42A3-5-F-26 and have requested that the portion of the Alley adjacent to their property be vacated; and WHEREAS, after following the procedures established in Virginia Code § 15.2-2006, the Town Council concludes that the request should be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Council of the Town of Luray, Virginia, as follows: 1. The portion of the Alley running from North Court Street to North Bank Street that is immediately adjacent to and parallel with the boundary of Tax Map No. 42A3-5-F-26 is hereby vacated. 2. The Town makes no representation or warranty regarding the impact, if any, of the foregoing vacation upon the boundaries of the adjoining land parcels. 3. The Town reserves a public utility easement over, under, upon, and across the vacated portion of the Alley for the right and privilege to access, construct, operate, and maintain public facilities including water and sewer lines, drainage facilities, utilities, and all related equipment, accessories, and appurtenances. Mayor 1 z\Gen2\07054-0TownofLuray\07054.0.1GenMatters\07054.0.1WorkingDocs.\ Gen.Ordinances\Ord.Vacation\Ord.Vac.Sommers\01.30.26 CERTIFICATE I certify that I am the Clerk of the Town of Luray, Virginia, and that the foregoing is a true copy of an Ordinance adopted by the Council of the Town of Luray, Virginia, on March 9, 2026, upon the following vote: NAME AYE NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Mayor Lillard1 Ron Vickers Jerry Dofflemyer Ryan Dean Jason Pettit Joey Sours Charles Butler, Jr. Date: March 9, 2026 [SEAL] ATTEST: Clerk, Town Council of Luray, Virginia 1 Votes only in the event of a tie. 2 z\Gen2\07054-0TownofLuray\07054.0.1GenMatters\07054.0.1WorkingDocs.\ Gen.Ordinances\Ord.Vacation\Ord.Vac.Sommers\01.30.26 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF PAGE The foregoing Ordinance was acknowledged before me this ___ day of February, 2026, by Stephanie Lillard, Mayor of the Town of Luray, Virginia, on behalf of the Town. My commission expires: _________________. Notary Registration No.: _________________. _______________________________ Notary Public COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF PAGE The foregoing Ordinance was acknowledged before me this ___ day of February, 2026, by Danielle P. Babb, Clerk of the Town of Luray, Virginia, on behalf of the Town. My commission expires: _________________. Notary Registration No.: _________________. _______________________________ Notary Public 3 z\Gen2\07054-0TownofLuray\07054.0.1GenMatters\07054.0.1WorkingDocs.\ Gen.Ordinances\Ord.Vacation\Ord.Vac.Sommers\01.30.26 TOWN OF LURAY Town Council Regular Meeting March 9, 2026 Discussion Items IXB. County of Page Alley Vacation Request – 215 W. Page St. Town of Luray, Virginia Item No: IX-B Town Council Agenda Statement Meeting Date: March 9, 2026 Agenda Item: TOWN COUNCIL DISCUSSION & POTENTIAL ACTION Item IX-B – Alley Vacation Request Summary: The Town Council is requested to discuss and consider taking action on the requested alley vacation request from: County of Page 215 West Page Street Requesting vacation of a portion of the alley beside their property for the construction of a new retaining wall to support 215 West Page Street Copies of the request letter and aerials are included for review. Council held a Public Hearing on this issue at their February 9, 2026, meeting. A neighbor spoke against the request due to his access concerns. The general feeling was that the County should consider replacing the current retaining wall where it is currently located. Therefore, a vacation of a part of the alley would not be required. A temporary construction easement could be granted to allow construction while neighboring access would be maintained. The Town postponed action to await a Site Plan from the County. Additionally, the alley property pins and/or line were to be survey-marked in the field. Commission Review: N/A Fiscal Impact: N/A Suggested Motions: I move that the Alley Vacation Request & Ordinance be approved, as presented. OR I move that the Alley Vacation Request & Ordinance be approved with the following changes____________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ OR I move that Alley Vacation Request & Ordinance be denied for the following reasons____________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ Agenda Item 9B – Alley Vacation Request March 9, 2026 Supplemental Report 215 West Page Street The County of Page has acquired this parcel located at 215 W. Page Street. This was the former site of Strickler Garage & Repair Shop, and before that it housed the Town of Luray Public Works Shop. The intention of the five (5) foot alley vacation is to allow a new retaining wall to be constructed. A temporary construction easement of another ten (10) feet will be requested from the Town in order to build this wall. The Town has no intention of building this section of South Bank Street. There is a water line in the alley that serves the only house at 115 West Page Street. We believe that the sewer for 115 West Page Street goes downhill to South Hawksbill Street. Provided that access is not impeded for the owner/tenant of 115 West Page Street, we have no objection to this vacation. Damage to any existing utilities must be immediately repaired by the County of Page. The Town will continue to retain rights for access, storm water, and utilities as before. Recent comments from the adjacent tenant had indicated that the replacement of the existing wall in its same footprint is preferred. In that case, no permanent alley vacation would be needed. A temporary construction easement would still be needed. Ordinance No. 2026-__ AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE TOWN OF LURAY, VIRGINIA THIS ORDINANCE is enacted on the 9th day of March, 2026, by the Council of the TOWN OF LURAY, VIRGINIA, a Virginia municipal corporation (index as “Grantor”) upon the application of PAGE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, a Virginia political subdivision (index as “Grantee”). WHEREAS, there exists a certain public right-of-way (the “Alley”) within the Town of Luray running from West Page Street between a parcel identified as Tax Map No. 42A10-A-115 and parcels identified as Tax Map Nos. 42A10-A-116, 42A11-7-5, and 42A10-A-116A. WHEREAS, Page County, Virginia, is the owner of the parcel identified as Tax Map No. 42A10-A-115 and has requested that the Town vacate the five-foot wide portion of the Alley that is immediately adjacent to and parallel with the eastern boundary of its parcel; and WHEREAS, after following the procedures established in Virginia Code § 15.2-2006, the Town Council concludes that the request should be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Council of the Town of Luray, Virginia, as follows: 1. The five-foot wide portion of the Alley running from West Page Street immediately adjacent to and parallel with the eastern boundary of Tax Map No. 42A10-A-115 is hereby vacated. 2. The Town makes no representation or warranty regarding the impact, if any, of the foregoing vacation upon the boundaries of the adjoining land parcels. 3. The Town reserves a public utility easement over, under, upon, and across the vacated portion of the Alley for the right and privilege to access, construct, operate, and maintain public facilities including water and sewer lines, drainage facilities, utilities, and all related equipment, accessories, and appurtenances. Mayor 1 z\Gen2\07054-0TownofLuray\07054.0.1GenMatters\07054.0.1WorkingDocs.\ Gen.Ordinances\Ord.Vacation\Ord.Vac.County\01.30.26 CERTIFICATE I certify that I am the Clerk of the Town of Luray, Virginia, and that the foregoing is a true copy of an Ordinance adopted by the Council of the Town of Luray, Virginia, on March 9, 2026, upon the following vote: NAME AYE NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Mayor Lillard1 Ron Vickers Jerry Dofflemyer Ryan Dean Jason Pettit Joey Sours Charles Butler, Jr. Date: March 9, 2026 [SEAL] ATTEST: Clerk, Town Council of Luray, Virginia 1 Votes only in the event of a tie. 2 z\Gen2\07054-0TownofLuray\07054.0.1GenMatters\07054.0.1WorkingDocs.\ Gen.Ordinances\Ord.Vacation\Ord.Vac.County\01.30.26 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF PAGE The foregoing Ordinance was acknowledged before me this ___ day of February, 2026, by Stephanie Lillard, Mayor of the Town of Luray, Virginia, on behalf of the Town. My commission expires: _________________. Notary Registration No.: _________________. _______________________________ Notary Public COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF PAGE The foregoing Ordinance was acknowledged before me this ___ day of February, 2026, by Danielle P. Babb, Clerk of the Town of Luray, Virginia, on behalf of the Town. My commission expires: _________________. Notary Registration No.: _________________. _______________________________ Notary Public 3 z\Gen2\07054-0TownofLuray\07054.0.1GenMatters\07054.0.1WorkingDocs.\ Gen.Ordinances\Ord.Vacation\Ord.Vac.County\01.30.26 TOWN OF LURAY Town Council Regular Meeting March 9, 2026 Action Items XA. Sign Ordinance Amendments Town of Luray, Virginia Item No: X-A Town Council Agenda Statement Meeting Date: March 9, 2026 Agenda Item: TOWN COUNCIL DISCUSSION & ACTION Item X-A Sign Ordinance Amendments Summary: The Town Council is requested to consider adopting the proposed sign ordinance amendments. These changes have been proposed by Town staff and formulated by the Town Attorney. A copy of the latest proposed Ordinance and Exhibit are included for review Principal elements of the proposed amendments include, but are not limited to: Reducing the size and scope of the Ordinance Increasing the type of signs allowed without a permit Increasing the size and/or number of certain allowable sign types Consolidating several sections of the Ordinance Eliminating unneeded portions of the previous ordinance Ensuring conformity with applicable state codes Simplifying the Ordinance for use by customers and staff Council held a Public Hearing on this topic at their February 9, 2026, regular meeting. No action was taken since the Council was awaiting a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Commission Review: January 14, 2026, Public Hearing No Action Taken February 11, 2026, Action Item Recommended for Approval 7 – 0 (with the changes noted by the Council) Fiscal Impact: N/A Suggested Motions: I move that the Sign Ordinance Amendments be approved, as presented. OR I move that the Sign Ordinance Amendments be approved with the following changes____________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ OR I move that Sign Ordinance Amendments be denied for the following reasons____________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ARTICLE VIII. SIGNS 801. General provisions. 801.1. Purpose and intent: The purpose of this article is to regulate the size, location, height and construction of all signs placed on private property for public observance; to protect the public health, safety, convenience and general welfare; to facilitate the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community; and to protect property values. This article shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. If any provision of this article is found to be invalid, such finding shall not affect the validity of other provisions of this article that can be given effect without the invalid provision. 801.2. Definitions. Flag. A sign applied to cloth or similar material attachable by one edge to a pole or rope. Ground sign. A sign that is supported by structures or supports in or upon the ground and independent of any support from any building or wall. Location. The broadest of the following: (a) a lot, (b) multiple lots spanned by a single commercial enterprise, organization, or entity, or (c) a shopping center comprised of multiple commercial enterprises. Minor sign. A sign not exceeding six square foot in sign area and six feet in height. Off-premises sign. A sign, such as a billboard, which directs attention to an event, activity, business, commodity, service or establishment conducted, sold or offered at a location other than the location on which the sign is erected. Sign. Any object, device, display, or structure, or part thereof, visible from a public place, a public right-of- way, any parking area or right-of-way open to use by the general public, which is designed and used to attract attention to an institution, organization, business, product, service, event, or location by any means involving letters, words, figures, designs, symbols, fixtures, logos, colors, illumination, or projected images. Sign area. The surface area of the face of the sign, all frames, and all other components not used for support. In calculating sign area, exterior dimensions are used and any open space within the sign is included. The sign area of a sign designed to be viewed from two directions shall be the area of the largest sign. Nonetheless, if the two faces of a sign are (a) more than two feet apart, or (b) neither parallel nor at an angle of less than 45 degrees, the area of the sign shall be the total area of all sides. Sign height. Sign height for ground signs is the distance from the ground to the highest point on the sign or its support structure. Temporary sign. A temporary sign is either (a) a sign, pennant, valance, banner, feather banner, or advertising display constructed of cloth, canvas, light fabric, cardboard, wallboard, plastic, or other light materials with or without frames, intended to be displayed for a short period of time, or (b) a sign, through the use of wheels or otherwise, which is designed to be transported from place to place. The category of "temporary signs" is not mutually exclusive with other categories. For example, a temporary sign may also be a ground sign. Therefore, a temporary sign must meet the requirements for temporary signs as well as other requirements which apply to the type of sign involved. Wall sign. A sign with one face attached to or with or without a bracket attached to or painted upon a wall or other vertical surface of a structure such as a window, marquee, canopy, or awning. 801.3. Sign permit required. Except as provided herein, no sign shall be erected, installed, used, altered, relocated, replaced or reconstructed until a sign permit has been issued. All signs are considered accessory uses and accessory structures. 801.4. Prohibited signs. The following signs are prohibited: 1 (a) Off-premises signs. (b) Any sign which may be confused with or obstruct the view of a traffic sign or signal. (c) Animated signs that rotate, move, or appear to rotate or move, including but not limited to pennants, propellers, and discs. This does not include the hands of a clock or a weather vane. (d) Signs that flash, blink, or turn on and off intermittently. (e) Glaring signs, signs with moving or changing images, and signs with light sources that constitute a traffic hazard or distraction. (f) Signs affixed to a tree, other natural vegetation, rocks, public utility poles, or public signs. (g) Window signs that occupy more than 50 percent of the area of a window. (h) Signs that obstruct the visibility of intersections or block any door, fire escape, or stairway, or any opening intended for light, air or access to any building. (i) Signs erected on public property or within or over a public right-of-way. 801.5. Signs Allowed Without a Permit. The following signs are allowed without a permit in all zoning districts and do not count against the zoning-specific allowances set forth in Section 801.6: (a) Plaques, tablets or markers made of granite, bronze or a similar material. (b) Flags up to 36 square feet in sign area. (c) Three minor signs per lot. (d) A ground sign not to exceed 36 square feet in area or six feet in height at each major street entrance to a subdivision. (e) Signs attached to gasoline pumps or protective structures adjacent to such pumps provided the sign is not larger than the pump itself. (f) Window signs aligned against the top of the window frame on the first floor of a structure that cover up to 50 percent of the area of each window. (g) The following temporary signs: (1) Temporary signs not more than six feet in height and 36 feet in sign area on: (i) Any lot for sale or rent, but only until the property is sold or rented; (ii) Any lot with an active building permit during the life of the permit; (iii) Any lot zoned R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, or R-5 for a period of 60 days. (2) For any lot zoned B-1 or M-1: (i) Feather banners not more than 12 feet in height and 36 square feet in area for a period of 60 days. (ii) Two sandwich board signs not more than seven square feet in sign area per side and six feet in height displayed during business hours in a manner that does not impede pedestrian traffic or intersection visibility. (h) Any sign erected by the town or required by law. 801.6. Signs allowed by Permit. (a) R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, R-5, and PND zoning districts: (1) On a lot with a non-residential use, one ground sign up to six feet in height or one wall sign up to ten feet in height with neither to exceed 36 square feet in area. 2 (2) One temporary sign of not more than six feet in height and 36 square feet in area may be displayed at each residential subdivision entrance for up to two years. (b) B-1 and M-1 zoning districts: (1) For each location, one ground sign of up to (i) 36 square feet in area, or (ii) one square foot in area for each linear foot of principal building width facing the public right-of-way, whichever is greater. (2) For each street frontage of a commercial, industrial, or other enterprise, one wall sign of up to (i) 56 square feet in area, or (ii) two square feet in area for each linear foot of principal building width facing the public right-of-way, whichever is greater. (3) Minor signs throughout each location. (c) Temporary signs. The following temporary signs up to six feet in height and 36 square feet in sign area are allowed by permit and may be displayed for a maximum period of 60 days: (1) Temporary signs advertising an event. (2) Temporary signs on a vacant lot. (3) Temporary signs on a location with a business that is new, closing, or under new management. 801.8. General limitations. (a) Height. Unless a more restrictive limit is specified, the following maximum heights apply: (1) R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, and R-5 zoning districts: (i) Flags: 25 feet. (ii) Ground signs: 15 feet. (2) PND, B-1 and M-1 zoning districts: (i) Flags: 35 feet. (ii) Ground signs: 25 feet. (b) Location. (1) No sign may be erected or constructed, in whole or in part, upon or above the highest point of a building with a flat roof, or the lowest portion of a roof for any building with a pitched roof. This limitation shall not apply to the gable end of structures located in the B-1 and M-1 zoning districts. (2) A five-foot setback shall be observed for any sign located within 25 feet of a street or public right-of-way. The setback shall be measured from the property boundary to the closest point of the sign. (3) No sign within 100 feet of the boundary of a lot with an existing residential use may be illuminated with an exterior light sourceunless the illumination does not shine or reflect light onto the lot with the residential use. (c) A temporary sign for which a maximum display period is specified that is may not beremoved may not be replaced by the same or another temporary sign for 60 days after being displayed for the specified display period. (d) All signs and components shall be maintained in good repair and in a safe, clean and attractive condition. (e) All signs shall be constructed in compliance with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. All illuminated signs shall comply with the National Electrical Code. 3 802. Administration. 802.1. Sign permit applications. (a) Filing of applications; fees. Applications for sign permits shall be filed by the applicant or his agent with the zoning administrator along with a nonrefundable filing fee. (b) Information required. Every application shall include the following information: (1) Name, address and telephone number of the applicant. (2) Position of the sign in relation to adjacent lot lines, buildings, sidewalks, streets and intersections. (3) A general description of the proposed sign type, structural design, and construction materials. (4) Purpose of the proposed signs. (5) Drawings of the proposed sign with specifications of the height, perimeter, area dimensions, means of support, method of illumination, colors, and any other significant aspect of the proposed sign. (6) Size and placement of all existing signs on the lot. (7) For temporary signs, the time period during which the applicant seeks to display the proposed sign. (8) The relevant principal building width for signs permitted pursuant to Sections 801.6(b)(1)(ii) and 801.6(b)(2)(ii). (c) The zoning administrator shall review each application and either approve the application, reject the application, or notify the applicant of deficiencies in the application within five business days after receipt. Any application that meets all requirements of this article, the building code, and other applicable laws, regulations, and ordinances shall be approved. If an application is rejected, the zoning administrator shall provide a list of the reasons for the rejection in writing. An application shall be rejected for non-compliance with the terms of the zoning ordinance, building code, or other applicable law, regulation, or ordinance. (d) Sign permits shall be numbered in the order of issuances and recorded separately from other zoning permits for building or remodeling. The zoning administrator shall maintain a record of all sign permits issued. (e) If a sign is not constructed within 12 months following the issuance of a sign permit (or within 30 days in the case of a temporary sign permit), the permit shall be void. A permit for a temporary sign shall state its duration. The town may revoke a sign permit under any of the following circumstances: (1) The town determines that information in the application was materially false or misleading. (2) The sign as installed does not conform to the sign permit application. (3) The sign violates the zoning ordinance, building code, or other applicable law, regulation, or ordinance. 802.2. Nonconforming signs. Any sign lawfully in existence on the effective date of this article that does not conform to the provisions herein, and any sign that is accessory to a nonconforming use, shall be deemed a legally nonconforming sign. The restoration and replacement of legally nonconforming signs shall be governed by appendix A, article VI, section 607 of the town code. 802.3. Special exceptions: Upon proper application and after following the process described in chapter 703 of article VII, the town council may grant a special use permit authorizing a sign which would otherwise be prohibited by this article. The permit may contain such conditions as the town council deems proper. 4 Ordinance No. 2026-__ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE VIII OF APPENDIX A OF THE TOWN CODE OF THE TOWN OF LURAY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, Appendix A of the Town Code currently sets forth the zoning ordinance that applies to property within the Town; and WHEREAS, textual amendments to Article VIII of Appendix A have been proposed that would simplify and streamline provisions regarding signs while expanding and standardizing sign allowances in a responsible manner within the Town; and WHEREAS, the Town Planning Commission conducted a duly-advertised public hearing on the proposed amendments and has provided a recommendation to the Town Council; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has conducted a duly-advertised public hearing and wishes to adopt the proposed amendments. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Council of the Town of Luray, Virginia, as follows: 1. Article VIII of Appendix A of the Town Code is hereby amended and readopted as shown in Exhibit A. 2. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately. Adopted: March 9, 2026 _______________________________ Mayor 1 z\7054 Town of Luray\7054.0.1 General Matters\ Working Docs\Ord.AdoptingSignAmend\JAB\03.03.26 CERTIFICATE I certify that I am the Clerk of the Town of Luray, Virginia, and that the foregoing is a true copy of an Ordinance adopted by the Council of the Town of Luray, Virginia, on March 9, 2026, upon the following vote: NAME AYE NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT Mayor Lillard1 Ron Vickers Jerry Dofflemyer Ryan Dean Jason Pettit Joey Sours Charles Butler, Jr. Date: March 9, 2026 [SEAL] ATTEST: ________________________________ Clerk, Town Council of Town of Luray, Virginia 1 Votes only in the event of a tie. 2 z\7054 Town of Luray\7054.0.1 General Matters\ Working Docs\Ord.AdoptingSignAmend\JAB\03.03.26 EXHIBIT A ARTICLE VIII. SIGNS 801. General provisions. 801.1. Purpose and intent: The purpose of this article is to regulate the size, location, height and construction of all signs placed on private property for public observance; to protect the public health, safety, convenience and general welfare; to facilitate the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community; and to protect property values. This article shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. If any provision of this article is found to be invalid, such finding shall not affect the validity of other provisions of this article that can be given effect without the invalid provision. 801.2. Definitions. Flag. A sign applied to cloth or similar material attachable by one edge to a pole or rope. Ground sign. A sign that is supported by structures or supports in or upon the ground and independent of any support from any building or wall. Location. The broadest of the following: (a) a lot, (b) multiple lots spanned by a single commercial enterprise, organization, or entity, or (c) a shopping center comprised of multiple commercial enterprises. Minor sign. A sign not exceeding six square foot in sign area and six feet in height. Off-premises sign. A sign, such as a billboard, which directs attention to an event, activity, business, commodity, service or establishment conducted, sold or offered at a location other than the location on which the sign is erected. Sign. Any object, device, display, or structure, or part thereof, visible from a public place, a public right-of- way, any parking area or right-of-way open to use by the general public, which is designed and used to attract attention to an institution, organization, business, product, service, event, or location by any means involving letters, words, figures, designs, symbols, fixtures, logos, colors, illumination, or projected images. Sign area. The surface area of the face of the sign, all frames, and all other components not used for support. In calculating sign area, exterior dimensions are used and any open space within the sign is included. The sign area of a sign designed to be viewed from two directions shall be the area of the largest sign. Nonetheless, if the two faces of a sign are (a) more than two feet apart, or (b) neither parallel nor at an angle of less than 45 degrees, the area of the sign shall be the total area of all sides. Sign height. Sign height for ground signs is the distance from the ground to the highest point on the sign or its support structure. Temporary sign. A temporary sign is either (a) a sign, pennant, valance, banner, feather banner, or advertising display constructed of cloth, canvas, light fabric, cardboard, wallboard, plastic, or other light materials with or without frames, intended to be displayed for a short period of time, or (b) a sign, through the use of wheels or otherwise, which is designed to be transported from place to place. The category of "temporary signs" is not mutually exclusive with other categories. For example, a temporary sign may also be a ground sign. Therefore, a temporary sign must meet the requirements for temporary signs as well as other requirements which apply to the type of sign involved. Wall sign. A sign with or without a bracket attached to or painted upon a wall or other vertical surface of a structure such as a window, marquee, canopy, or awning. 801.3. Sign permit required. Except as provided herein, no sign shall be erected, installed, used, altered, relocated, replaced or reconstructed until a sign permit has been issued. All signs are considered accessory uses and accessory structures. 1 801.4. Prohibited signs. The following signs are prohibited: (a) Off-premises signs. (b) Any sign which may be confused with or obstruct the view of a traffic sign or signal. (c) Animated signs that rotate, move, or appear to rotate or move, including but not limited to pennants, propellers, and discs. This does not include the hands of a clock or a weather vane. (d) Signs that flash, blink, or turn on and off intermittently. (e) Glaring signs, signs with moving or changing images, and signs with light sources that constitute a traffic hazard or distraction. (f) Signs affixed to a tree, other natural vegetation, rocks, public utility poles, or public signs. (g) Window signs that occupy more than 50 percent of the area of a window. (h) Signs that obstruct the visibility of intersections or block any door, fire escape, or stairway, or any opening intended for light, air or access to any building. (i) Signs erected on public property or within or over a public right-of-way. 801.5. Signs Allowed Without a Permit. The following signs are allowed without a permit in all zoning districts and do not count against the zoning-specific allowances set forth in Section 801.6: (a) Plaques, tablets or markers made of granite, bronze or a similar material. (b) Flags up to 36 square feet in sign area. (c) Three minor signs per lot. (d) A ground sign not to exceed 36 square feet in area or six feet in height at each major street entrance to a subdivision. (e) Signs attached to gasoline pumps or protective structures adjacent to such pumps provided the sign is not larger than the pump itself. (f) Window signs aligned against the top of the window frame on the first floor of a structure that cover up to 50 percent of the area of each window. (g) The following temporary signs: (1) Temporary signs not more than six feet in height and 36 feet in sign area on: (i) Any lot for sale or rent, but only until the property is sold or rented; (ii) Any lot with an active building permit during the life of the permit; (iii) Any lot zoned R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, or R-5 for a period of 60 days. (2) For any lot zoned B-1 or M-1: (i) Feather banners not more than 12 feet in height and 36 square feet in area. (ii) Two sandwich board signs not more than seven square feet in sign area per side and six feet in height displayed during business hours in a manner that does not impede pedestrian traffic or intersection visibility. (h) Any sign erected by the town or required by law. 801.6. Signs allowed by Permit. (a) R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, R-5, and PND zoning districts: (1) On a lot with a non-residential use, one ground sign up to six feet in height or one wall sign up to ten feet in height with neither to exceed 36 square feet in area. 2 (2) One temporary sign of not more than six feet in height and 36 square feet in area may be displayed at each residential subdivision entrance for up to two years. (b) B-1 and M-1 zoning districts: (1) For each location, one ground sign of up to (i) 36 square feet in area, or (ii) one square foot in area for each linear foot of principal building width facing the public right-of-way, whichever is greater. (2) For each street frontage of a commercial, industrial, or other enterprise, one wall sign of up to (i) 56 square feet in area, or (ii) two square feet in area for each linear foot of principal building width facing the public right-of-way, whichever is greater. (3) Minor signs throughout each location. (c) Temporary signs. The following temporary signs up to six feet in height and 36 square feet in sign area are allowed by permit and may be displayed for a maximum period of 60 days: (1) Temporary signs advertising an event. (2) Temporary signs on a vacant lot. (3) Temporary signs on a location with a business that is new, closing, or under new management. 801.8. General limitations. (a) Height. Unless a more restrictive limit is specified, the following maximum heights apply: (1) R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, and R-5 zoning districts: (i) Flags: 25 feet. (ii) Ground signs: 15 feet. (2) PND, B-1 and M-1 zoning districts: (i) Flags: 35 feet. (ii) Ground signs: 25 feet. (b) Location. (1) No sign may be erected or constructed, in whole or in part, upon or above the highest point of a building with a flat roof, or the lowest portion of a roof for any building with a pitched roof. This limitation shall not apply to the gable end of structures located in the B-1 and M-1 zoning districts. (2) A five-foot setback shall be observed for any sign located within 25 feet of a street or public right-of-way. The setback shall be measured from the property boundary to the closest point of the sign. (3) No sign within 100 feet of the boundary of a lot with an existing residential use may be illuminated with an exterior light source. (c) A temporary sign for which a maximum display period is specified may not be replaced by the same or another temporary sign for 60 days after being displayed for the specified display period. (d) All signs and components shall be maintained in good repair and in a safe, clean and attractive condition. (e) All signs shall be constructed in compliance with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. All illuminated signs shall comply with the National Electrical Code. 3 802. Administration. 802.1. Sign permit applications. (a) Filing of applications; fees. Applications for sign permits shall be filed by the applicant or his agent with the zoning administrator along with a nonrefundable filing fee. (b) Information required. Every application shall include the following information: (1) Name, address and telephone number of the applicant. (2) Position of the sign in relation to adjacent lot lines, buildings, sidewalks, streets and intersections. (3) A general description of the proposed sign type, structural design, and construction materials. (4) Purpose of the proposed signs. (5) Drawings of the proposed sign with specifications of the height, perimeter, area dimensions, means of support, method of illumination, colors, and any other significant aspect of the proposed sign. (6) Size and placement of all existing signs on the lot. (7) For temporary signs, the time period during which the applicant seeks to display the proposed sign. (8) The relevant principal building width for signs permitted pursuant to Sections 801.6(b)(1)(ii) and 801.6(b)(2)(ii). (c) The zoning administrator shall review each application and either approve the application, reject the application, or notify the applicant of deficiencies in the application within five business days after receipt. Any application that meets all requirements of this article, the building code, and other applicable laws, regulations, and ordinances shall be approved. If an application is rejected, the zoning administrator shall provide a list of the reasons for the rejection in writing. An application shall be rejected for non-compliance with the terms of the zoning ordinance, building code, or other applicable law, regulation, or ordinance. (d) Sign permits shall be numbered in the order of issuances and recorded separately from other zoning permits for building or remodeling. The zoning administrator shall maintain a record of all sign permits issued. (e) If a sign is not constructed within 12 months following the issuance of a sign permit (or within 30 days in the case of a temporary sign permit), the permit shall be void. A permit for a temporary sign shall state its duration. The town may revoke a sign permit under any of the following circumstances: (1) The town determines that information in the application was materially false or misleading. (2) The sign as installed does not conform to the sign permit application. (3) The sign violates the zoning ordinance, building code, or other applicable law, regulation, or ordinance. 802.2. Nonconforming signs. Any sign lawfully in existence on the effective date of this article that does not conform to the provisions herein, and any sign that is accessory to a nonconforming use, shall be deemed a legally nonconforming sign. The restoration and replacement of legally nonconforming signs shall be governed by appendix A, article VI, section 607 of the town code. 802.3. Special exceptions: Upon proper application and after following the process described in chapter 703 of article VII, the town council may grant a special use permit authorizing a sign which would otherwise be prohibited by this article. The permit may contain such conditions as the town council deems proper. 4 TOWN OF LURAY Town Council Regular Meeting March 9, 2026 Town Attorney’s Report XIA. Civil Penalties LITTEN & S IPE MEETING MEMORANDUM 410 NEFF AVENUE  HARRISONBURG, VIRGINIA 22801 S INCE 1 877 P HONE : (540) 434-5353  F AX : (540) 434-6069 E MAIL : jason.botkins@littensipe.com  INTERNET : www.littensipe.com TO: Mayor and Town Council FROM: Jason Botkins DATE: March 9, 2026 RE: Civil Penalties for Zoning Ordinance Violations - Zoning ordinances have traditionally been enforced by prosecuting violations as crimes. - There’s a general reluctance by Courts to impose a criminal penalty for violating a zoning ordinance. o This usually results in numerous continuances spanning a significant time period – sometimes years – to provide the owner with every last opportunity to comply. o The process and outcome are often unsatisfactory due to the time and cost involved to abate a violation. - Service of process is also an issue for owners that live outside Virginia because it requires cooperation by non-Virginia law enforcement to obtain personal service. - Virginia Code § 15.2-2209 authorizes a civil penalty that replaces the criminal penalty for violating a zoning ordinance. The ceilings on the penalties are: o $200 for the first violation. o $1,000 for the second violation. o $1,500 for a third or subsequent violation. o A total of $4,200 for all violations within a 12-month period. - Civil penalties totaling $5,000 or more may still be prosecuted as a criminal misdemeanor. - Here is a summary of the process: o The Zoning Administrator issues a civil summons for a zoning violation that includes a return date in General District Court. 1  Although not required by statute, we recommend providing one written notice prior to the civil summons so that the owner has an opportunity to comply without any fine being imposed. o Personal service of the summons on the owner is not required because it is a civil claim – posted and substituted service can be used when permitted. o The person summoned may appear in person or in writing by mail to the Town Treasurer prior to the court date. o The person summoned may enter a waiver of trial, admit liability, and pay the civil penalty after being informed of their right to a trial and that admitting liability has the same effect as a court judgment.  The person admitting liability is also required to abate the violation within a time period set by the Town of at least 30 days but not more than 24 months. o If a person summoned does not elect to waive trial and admit liability, the violation is tried in the general district court in same manner as any other civil claim. o If the case is tried, the court is authorized to order the violator to abate the violation within a time period not to exceed six months. 2

Get email alerts for Luray

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting