Public Improvement and Transportation Committee
Regular MeetingMarshall, MN · February 29, 2024
Minutes
MINUTES
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT/TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING
February 29, 2024
5:30 PM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Schafer (via Zoom), Lozinski, Alcorn
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: City Administrator Sharon Hanson
Director of Public Works/City Engineer Jason Anderson,
Park & Recreation Supervisor Preston Stensrud
City Assessor Dave Parsons
OTHERS PRESENT: Sarah Sonsalla, Attorney for Kennedy and Graven, Mayor Robert Byrnes, Councilmember
Steven Meister
Call to Order
Lozinski on behalf of Chair Schafer called the meeting to order at 5:31 pm.
1. Approval of the Minutes
MOTION BY Schafer, SECOND BY Alcorn to approve the minutes of the February 13, 2024, Public
Improvement/Transportation Committee meeting. ALL VOTED IN FAVOR. MOTION PASSED 3:0.
2. Elaine Park Discussion
Administrator Hanson provided information on the history of Eatros Place. In 1947 the area was platted and developed
as a new housing development and the Eatros family dedicated Elaine and Michael Parks to the city on the plat, as an
easement for park purposes. Since this was through an easement the city does not actually own Elaine or Michael Park
like the other parks within city limits. The Marshall Golf Course and the Eatros Family would be the title holders of the
land according to the Eatros Place plat. In 2006 the Public Improvement and Transportation Committee reviewed Elaine
Park and decided to not vacate the park and left maintenance to the area residents. On February 13, 2012, the city of
Marshall held a meeting with homeowners to discuss options for Elaine Park and following the meeting no process for
land transfer had been started or completed. In late 2023 a property owner queried the city to maintain Elaine Park,
which prompted the request from the city to meet with surrounding homeowners. Hanson presented a few options
the city could take.
1. City staff maintained the park but would stake boundaries of the park and any personal property would need
to be removed. Such as sheds or playsets.
2. The City could try to obtain clear title to the park property from the Eatros Family and Marshall Golf Course.
Once title was obtained the park would be divided through a new plat and a sales price would be determined
and sold to adjoining property owners. Through the plat process easements would need to be obtained for
utilities.
3. An HOA could be established or a condo association to maintain the shared greenspace.
4. Leave Elaine Park as a “neighborhood park” and maintenance would continue to fall on the adjoining property
owners.
Attorney Sonsalla explained the process of what would need to be done for the city to obtain clear title to the land.
Dave Parsons expanded upon if the city were to obtain title and sell the land to homeowners. The value of the newly
PI/T – 02/29/2024
-1-
acquired land would increase property values if it were combined, which could result in an increase in property tax. If
any landowners had a mortgage, Lyon County would not combine the newly acquired land with their current home so
landowners would receive two tax statements.
Jon Schmugge, resident at 713 Marguerite Ave., asked about buildings or structures being on utility easements. Janine
Erickson spoke on behalf of her mother Fran Andrzewski, resident at 704 South 4th Street. Janine stated that her mother
would not like to continue to maintain the public area and would not be interested in purchasing the property if it were
to split. Fran would prefer it if the city were to maintain Elaine Park. Hanson and Sonsalla commented that if the city
were to divide the park every owner would need to purchase to streamline the process. Member Alcorn questioned
how HOA fees would work and what would be covered under the agreement. Parsons mentioned the HOA would at
least want to have enough fees to pay for mowing/weeds, property taxes, and possibly insurance. Member Schafer
spoke about covenants and possible liabilities that might fall under the HOA. Attorney Sonsalla stated that a declaration
of some sort would need to be drafted and recorded at the Lyon County Recorder’s Office as part of formalizing the
HOA process. The topic of drainage came up and how the park tended to retain water in the past. Director Anderson
stated during the Marguerite Street reconstruction project drains were moved and there should have been an impact
on the park as the water was being redirected. Deb Anderson, at 711 Marguerite Street, commented on the value of
having the green space and that some of the adjacent streets do use the park. Deb would be in favor of the city
maintaining the area, but they have issues with weeds and thistles. Stensrud said the parks department would be able
to mow but they wouldn’t be able to spray consistently. Deb also mentioned that an old tree had fallen and was
removed but the hole left behind was a concern as children could be injured by falling or tripping. Stensrud said the
parks department would consider bringing some dirt to fill the hole left by the tree. Matt Whitesitt at 700 South Fourth
Street wished for the park to be developed as an official city park with signage and ADA access. Chad Springborg at 612
West James Avenue commented that he would have liked the park to stay as a “neighborhood park” and left to the
surrounding homeowners. Member Lozinski remarked that an option could be to turn the park into a pollinator area
with wildflowers to reduce the need for maintenance. Lozinski also noted that in his area of the city the homeowners
maintain the medians that divide the one-way streets. Administrator Hanson spoke about encroachment issues and if
the direction was decided to have the city maintain Elaine Park personal property would need to be moved and
boundaries would need to be established. Sarah Whitesitt at 700 South Fourth Street questioned if things were left as
is who would be liable for an injury in the park area. It was noted that if the HOA were formed or if the land were
divided liability would fall onto the homeowners. Matt Whitsitt re-addressed the committee and commented about
city ordinances and mowing of other city parks.
Attorney Sonsalla again explained that the dedication of the park on the Eatros Place plat granted the city an easement
and no ownership of Elaine Park. Permission would need to be granted by the Eatros family and the Marshall Golf Club.
Janine Erickson on behalf of her mother Fran stated that her mother would have liked to see an actual decision made
with some form of formality. Hanson also indicated that she would like a binding decision on record. Hanson also
commented that among the individuals that had voiced their opinions no one mentioned vacating the park and selling
the land, nor forming an HOA. Member Schafer reiterated the integrity of a neighborhood park and the wishes of the
developer to allow some freedom and enjoyment of the park for the surrounding homeowners. Member Alcorn also
mentioned that he felt the developer intended the area to be a neighborhood park.
Adjourn
MOTION BY ALCORN, SECOND BY SCHAFER to adjourn the meeting. ALL VOTED IN FAVOR. MOTION PASSED 3:0.
Meeting adjourned at 6:20 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Steven Anderson, City Clerk
PI/T – 02/29/2024
-2-
Agenda
CITY OF MARSHALL
Public Improvement and Transportation
Committee
Agenda
Thursday, February 29, 2024 at 5:30 PM
344 W. Main St., City Hall
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Consider Approval of the Minutes
NEW BUSINESS
2. Elaine Park Discussion
ADJOURN
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a quorum of the Marshall City Council may be present. No action by the Council will be
taken during this meeting. Action will only be taken by members of the Public Improvement and Transportation
Committee to conduct the meeting.
Disclaimer: These agendas have been prepared to provide information regarding an upcoming meeting of the
Common Council of the City of Marshall. This document does not claim to be complete and is subject to change.
Get email alerts for Marshall
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.