City Council
Regular MeetingMinot, ND · September 21, 2017
Minutes
September 21, 2017
MINOT CITY COUNCIL – SCHEDULED MEETING – 6:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Barney, Jantzer, Olson, Podrygula, Sipma, Straight, Wolsky
Members Absent:
None
Mayor Chuck Barney presiding.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Barney led the City Council in the Pledge of Allegiance.
ICMATV MINOT RESILIENCE PROMOTIONAL VIDEO – APPROVED
Alderman Jantzer moved the City Council approve the use of $22,500 of NDR Administration funds to
Websedge with IMCA for production of a resilient themed promotional video and authorize the Mayor to sign
the agreement. Motion seconded by Alderman Straight.
The City Manager explained the request by saying, the City of Minot was offered an opportunity from ICMAtv, a
promotional arm to the International City and County Manager’s Association, to feature Minot in a video about
resilience. The video would be 5-6 minutes long and would run every hour at their conference in San Antonio
and would be available on their website. It would be seen by thousands of people in local government, as well as
consultants and engineers. This would afford the opportunity to not only recognize what the City of Minot is
doing but also identify additional engagement opportunities for future partners. There is a flat fee of $22,500 and
the City would own the rights to all interviews and footage obtained during production. The footage will be
edited how we choose and could be re-edited to use for other promotional videos as well. He said, he received
clarification from the NDR Program Manager, this project is eligible for funding under the Administrative funds
so there would be no cost to the City and it would not compromise any of the other projects.
Alderman Wolsky suggested using the information the City has gained during this experience to become a
training center for other cities who are working toward the same goals.
The City Manager agreed, there is an opportunity there and maintaining a national presence will demonstrate the
leadership we’ve shown and the work that has been done. There are other conferences available where staff
could show presentations or share papers to elicit interest.
Alderman Straight commented, this will be a great opportunity to showcase to other cities currently recovering
from hurricanes and earthquakes, a message that times are tough but you can overcome it.
Whereupon a vote was taken on the above motion by Alderman Jantzer, seconded by Alderman Straight and
carried by the following roll call vote: ayes: Barney, Jantzer, Olson, Podrygula, Sipma, Straight, Wolsky; nays:
none
ORDINANCE NO. 5228 – ADOPT THE 2018 ANNUAL BUDGET – SECOND READING –
APPROVED
Alderman Jantzer moved the City Council place ordinance no. 5228 on second reading to adopt the 2018
Annual Budget. Motion seconded by Alderman Sipma.
1|Page
September 21, 2017
The City Manager stated, he provided a memo outlining the various reductions to the budget that staff was
directed to find in an attempt to preserve the pay plan as recommended in the preliminary budget.
Alderman Podrygula moved the City Council amend ordinance no. 5228 to include the reductions proposed by
the City Manager and the pay plan as initially presented in the preliminary budget. Motion seconded by
Alderman Olson.
Travis Zablotney came forward in opposition to the amendment. He said, he has spoken with business owners
who have told him they have not imposed any raises this year. Most businesses have reduced their pay
through attrition and hiring new employees on a lower scale. The economy has been affected because without
the higher wages, people aren’t spending as much at local businesses. Property taxes will increase this year
even though all citizens are making less money. He asked how the City Manager was able to make additional
reductions if there was nothing left to cut and said he did not think it is fair to cut services. Lastly, he said,
public perception is that there is a conflict of interest when a Council member is directly affected by an
employee’s salary increase.
Chief Olson came forward regarding the conflict of interest and stated, he has offered to freeze his salary while
his spouse serves on the City Council and it has been included at the City Manager’s discretion. The Council
can also choose to vote separately on his wage to eliminate any appearance of a conflict of interest.
The Mayor stated, he believes Alderman Olson’s ethics are beyond reproach and her decisions are not
influenced by personal gain.
Krista Mattice and Aaron Moss, Executive Board Members of the Fraternal Order of Police, spoke in favor of
the amendment. They explained a letter they had published in the Minot Daily News. Senior Patrol Officer
Moss stated, the comparison to the private sector is not an accurate comparison and it does not paint the
picture of the effect on public safety. During boom times in the economy, the private sector may see dramatic
compensation increases when public employees do not experience the same increase. In exchange, the public
sector expects stability and predictability when it comes to our pay plans. He further explained, there is a
greater loss in tax dollars by not funding the pay plan. In the past, Council voted to eliminate the pension plan,
chipping away at the benefits for employees. As a result, employee morale is affected and leads to seeking
other employment. Minot Police Department has become a training ground where officers hire on, receive
training, and then find employment with a municipality that offers a better compensation package. Minot
employees pay out of pocket for healthcare whereas the county pays for their employee’s healthcare. Turnover
is constant in the Police Department and there are three to four hiring cycles each year. The staff has been
stretched thin in order to continuously train new officers meaning there is a lower experience base. He said, he
shares concerns about rising taxes, because he is also a Minot resident, but there are greater costs associated
when employees are not paid up front.
Upon questioning by Alderman Podrygula, Senior Patrol Officer Moss stated, when officers are hired, they
undergo a six-week in-house training, attend a 12-week basic law enforcement academy and spend 400 hours
in field training. In his opinion, it takes about five years to really get a feel for the job. Chief Olson then
explained, currently, 46% of officers have less than five years of experience and the median is six years with
the department.
Mr. Zablotney asked if the software was the reason the City implemented the pay plan across the entire
organization because it doesn’t allow individual changes. The HR Director said, the system has been in place
since 1992 and requires manual changes. The City Manager clarified, the software was developed in
2|Page
September 21, 2017
alignment with the pay plan that was approved by Council many years ago. They work together but it is not
the case where the staff is making a recommendation based on the limitations of the software.
Alderman Olson thanked the City Manager and the Finance Director for their hard work and said she hopes the
Council, who voted unanimously to direct staff to look for additional cuts to fund the pay plan, will honor that
commitment and vote in favor of the amendment.
Alderman Podrygula shared information regarding health insurance premiums and the difference that makes to
an employee’s pay. The wages between the City, County, State and MSU are comparable until you factor in
health insurance premiums, then the City pays $6,712.32 less per year for an employee with family coverage.
Upon questioning by Alderman Sipma, the City Manager said, staff was tasked with finding $424,901 in
reductions from the mill levy impacted accounts and $106,721 in non-mill levy impacted accounts. There
were approximately 41 line items from across the organization that were reduced in order to meet the request.
Alderman Wolsky discussed how President Jantzer’s recommendation is a reduction in the increase in
employee pay but not a reduction in pay. He said, he believes citizens need to see a gesture that symbolizes
they understand the significant increase they are putting on the taxpayers and are working to minimize that
increase without cutting services.
Aldermen Sipma and Straight agreed, there are proposed reductions listed which they are not willing to make.
From a business standpoint, it is a balancing act and they need to adjust with the economy.
Alderman Podrygula stated his final remarks on the subject by saying, the additional $0.40 per week the
average property owner will save by reducing the initial pay plan is not worth the effect it will have on
employee morale and services.
Whereupon a vote was taken on the amendment by Alderman Podrygula, seconded by Alderman Olson and
failed by the following roll call vote: ayes: Olson, Podrygula; nays: Barney, Jantzer, Sipma, Straight, Wolsky.
Alderman Podrygula moved the City Council amend the motion by proportionately reduce the awards of $1
Million from Community Development funds by $150,000 each and use those dollars to fully fund the pay
plan as initially proposed in the preliminary budget. Motion seconded by Alderman Olson.
The City Attorney clarified, the ordinance describing the second penny allocation specifies that 30% of the
second penny has to go toward Community Facilities.
Whereupon a vote was taken on the above motion by Alderman Podrygula, seconded by Alderman Olson and
failed by the following roll call vote: ayes: Podrygula; nays: Barney, Jantzer, Olson, Sipma, Straight, Wolsky.
Alderman Podrygula gave an explanation as to why he would be voting against the overall budget. He said,
the budget is a statement of the City’s priorities and he does not agree with spending $1 Million on the Zoo
when we cannot spend half of that amount on employees.
Larry Bellew, of 812 Bel Air Place, came forward in opposition to the budget. He said he is retired, on a fixed
income and will have a hard time paying an increase to property taxes. He estimated his personal tax increase
and spoke about the budget changes between 2009 and 2018.
Jeff Hoverson, Melissa Faris, and Travis Zablotney also spoke in opposition to the proposed budget and the
increase it would cause to property taxes.
3|Page
September 21, 2017
Whereupon a vote was taken on the original motion by Alderman Jantzer, seconded by Alderman Sipma and
carried by the following roll call vote: Barney, Jantzer, Olson, Sipma, Straight, Wolsky; nays: Podrygula
Alderman Jantzer moved the City Council pass ordinance no. 5228 on second reading. Motion seconded by
Alderman Sipma and carried by the following roll call vote: ayes: Barney, Jantzer, Olson, Sipma, Straight,
Wolsky; nays: Podrygula.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Alderman Sipma moved that the meeting be adjourned. Motion seconded by
Alderman Straight and carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 7:57 p.m.
ATTEST: APPROVED:
_________________________________
Kelly Matalka, City Clerk Chuck Barney, Mayor
4|Page
Get email alerts for Minot
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.