Muyni
← Back to Mission Hills

Architectural Review Board (ARB)

Regular Meeting

Mission Hills, KS · February 7, 2023

Agenda

Agenda

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD AGENDA February 7, 2023 3:00 p.m. Pre-meeting to begin at 2:30 p.m. #1 Craig & Joanne Scurato WITHDRAWN Guardrail on existing porch 6723 Tomahawk Road Continued from January 10th meeting #2 Scott & Kalynn Mueller New pergola over existing patio 6220 High Drive #3 Nicholas Hinrichs † Replacing swimming pool and patio / Hot tub 3300 W 69th Street #4 Nicholas Hinrichs Concrete roof 3300 W 69th Street Continued from January 24th meeting *Variance required. † Substantial Construction The Mission Hills Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) provides that the BZA shall determine whether or not an ARB decision was reasonable based upon the evidence presented to the ARB and the record of the ARB proceedings. Testimony at the BZA hearing will be limited to a discussion of the evidence presented to the ARB. No new evidence will be considered. #1 Craig & Joanne Scurato WITHDRAWN 6723 Tomahawk Road The Scuratos are proposing to install a new guardrail atop an existing covered porch. This project was continued at the January 10th meeting so a layout of the proposed railing could be presented along with details for installation. Summary of Property: • Character Area: Neighborhood Estates • Location of Common Green Space: Front & Side • Any Special Frontages: Intersection Green Summary of Project: The propose railing is a simple baluster system that will stand 36 inches tall. It is being installed atop an existing covered porch with a flat roof. Ordinance Compliance: There are no conflicts between the proposed project and the City of Mission Hills Code of Ordinances. Design Guideline Review: There are no conflicts between the proposed project and the City of Mission Hills Design Guidelines. February 7, 2023 #2 Scott & Kalynn Mueller 6220 High Drive The Muellers are proposing to add a new pergola over their existing patio. Summary of Property: • Character Area: Neighborhood Estates • Location of Common Green Space: Front & Side • Any Special Frontages: None Summary of Project: The proposed pergola is located at the rear of the house near the center of the main mass. It is a simple post-and-beam structure supported by the house at one end and two columns at the opposite end. The pergola will stand 10 feet tall. Ordinance Compliance: There are no conflicts between the proposed project and the City of Mission Hills Code of Ordinances. Design Guideline Review: There are no conflicts between the proposed project and the City of Mission Hills Design Guidelines. Lot Information Zoning: R-1(20)/LS-1 Lot Area: 15,284 sf Ordinance/Design Guideline Allowable/Required Provided Patio Minimum Side Yard: 15’ 41’ (Right), 51’ (Left) Patio Minimum Rear Yard: 15’ 35’ Drainage Study Required if any answer below is “Yes” Yes/No Is the project adding 1,000 sq. ft. or more of impervious surface? No Will the project cause the greenspace to be less than recommended by the Design Guidelines? No EXCEPT NO STUDY REQUIRED IF: 1) replacing existing impervious surface in approximately same footprint, and 2) project will not decrease existing greenspace on site Is there a documented drainage issue for this property? No *See the Mission Hills website for drainage study requirements – www.missionhillsks.gov *The Architectural Review Board may require the drainage study be submitted before they act on the proposed project. February 7, 2023 #3 Nicholas Hinrichs † 3300 West 69th Street Mr. Hinrichs is proposing to replace his existing swimming pool and patio, and add a hot tub. This is a substantial project and was noticed as such. Summary of Property: • Character Area: Neighborhood Estates • Location of Common Green Space: Front • Any Special Frontages: Edge Frontage Summary of Project: The proposed pool is located in approximately the same location as the existing pool. The pool includes an integral hot tub. The stone patio is being replaced with a new concrete paver patio. The pool equipment is located within the existing detached garage. Ordinance Compliance: There are no conflicts between the proposed project and the City of Mission Hills Code of Ordinances. Greenspace Review: Lot area: 20,015 sf House Footprint: 2,004 sf Detached Garage: 871 sf Driveway, Patios and walkways: 5,446 sf Remaining Greenspace: 11,694 sf 58.43% Design Guideline Review: Section 2.7.3.A on page 106 recommends that LS-3, 4 and 5 properties have a greenspace no less than 65% of the lot area. This recommendation has not been met. Please note that the proposed greenspace matches the existing greenspace. Lot Information Zoning: LS-3 Lot Area: 20,015 sf Lot Width: 100’ Ordinance/Design Guideline Allowable/Required Provided Patio Minimum Side Yard: 20’ 24.26’ Patio Minimum Rear Yard: 20’ 24.41’ Minimum Greenspace: 65% = 13,009 sf 11,694 sf = 58.43% Drainage Study Required if any answer below is “Yes” Yes/No Is the project adding 1,000 sq. ft. or more of impervious surface? No Will the project cause the greenspace to be less than recommended by the Design Guidelines? Yes EXCEPT NO STUDY REQUIRED IF: 1) replacing existing impervious surface in approximately same footprint, and Yes 2) project will not decrease existing greenspace on site Yes Is there a documented drainage issue for this property? No *See the Mission Hills website for drainage study requirements – www.missionhillsks.gov *The Architectural Review Board may require the drainage study be submitted before they act on the proposed project. February 7, 2023 #4 Nicholas Hinrichs 3300 West 69th Street Mr. Hinrichs is proposing a new concrete (faux slate) roof. Project continued from January 24th meeting so that a mock-up of a new edge profile could viewed by the ARB. Summary of Property: • Character Area: Suburban • Location of Common Green Space: Front • Any Special Frontages: None Summary of Project: The proposed product is a concrete-based tile made to look like natural slate. This is not a product that the ARB has included on the pre-approved roofing materials list. Ordinance Compliance: There are no conflicts between the proposed project and the City of Mission Hills Code of Ordinances. Design Guideline Review: There are no conflicts between the proposed project and the City of Mission Hills Design Guidelines. February 7, 2023

Get email alerts for Mission Hills

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting