City Council
Regular MeetingMission Hills, KS · April 1, 2022
Minutes
MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MISSION HILLS, KANSAS
April 1, 2022
The City Council of the City of Mission Hills, Kansas held a public hearing on April 1, 2022 at
12:00 p.m.
PRESIDING: Mayor David W. Dickey (via phone)
PRESENT: Councilpersons Bill Bruning, Braden Perry (via phone), Eden Thorne (via
phone), and Andy Weed (via phone)
ABSENT: Barbara Nelson
ALSO PRESENT: Jennifer Lee, City Administrator; Meghan Woolbright, City Clerk; Anna
Krstulic, City Attorney; Jesse Kirk, City Arborist
VISITORS: Tarak Devkota, 2517 W. 68th Street
Mayor Dickey called the public hearing to order to discuss if 2517 W. 68th Street should be
ordered repaired or demolished pursuant to K.S.A. 12-1750 et seq. and Section 5-301 et seq. of
the City Code at 12:05 p.m. Ms. Lee referred to the staff timeline that provided a history of the
ongoing nuisances and maintenance issues at 2517 W. 68th Street that started in December 2020
with the most recent and outstanding nuisance issue in February 2022. She noted that the
Architectural Review Board (ARB) had approved a whole house remodel for this address at the
February 15, 2022 meeting. Ms. Lee noted the next step towards issuing a permit is the
submission of construction drawings for the building inspector to review. At this time
construction drawings have yet to be submitted for this project. Ms. Lee added there is a
remaining balance due to the City for the fees to remedy nuisance issues at this property. Ms.
Lee stated that draft Resolution No. 2022-K had been prepared for Council’s consideration
following the public hearing.
Mr. Devkota requested an opportunity to review the draft Resolution No. 2022-K prior to further
Council discussion. Ms. Lee stated that the draft Resolution No. 2022-K is for the Council’s
consideration and Mr. Devkota was provided an opportunity to review the draft. Ms. Krstulic
stated that the specific violations against 2517 W. 68th Street and reason for the public hearing is
the structure does not meet the minimum building standards due to the fact that there is no water
service at the property. Mayor Dickey asked if the Council had any questions or comments.
Councilperson Bruning noted he attended the February 15, 2022 ARB meeting as the Council
liaison and was very impressed by Mr. Devkota’s proposal, but noted a lack of confidence that
action would be taken based on the history of ongoing nuisances and maintenance issues. He
continued that the Council is being proactive in this public hearing and noted the Council is
1
managing another vacant property issue where similarly the minimum building standards were
not met and overtime the property became a nuisance to the neighborhood and danger to children
playing. Councilperson Bruning stated that prior to taking any action today, he would require a
timeline for proceeding with the ARB approved project and assurances that the timeline would
be kept and there would be responsive communication between the property owner and City.
Mr. Devkota responded that he believes there has been a mischaracterization of the facts and he
has informally been in contact with City Hall trying to understand the violations. He asked that
the record reflect the violations at his property including nuisance lawn maintenance, a
recreational vehicle on property exceeding the allowed timeframe, porch disrepair, dangerous
limb removals, fence disrepair, and water utility shut-off. He opined that these violations did not
pose dangerous conditions for children and the structure was habitable when purchased. Mr.
Devkota stated that prior resident did not have a history of structural complaints and the building
itself is in the same condition in which he purchased it, so he fails to understand the City’s
position on the matter. He noted that the current supply chain issues for construction materials
and the increased demand for constructors has made it difficult for him to proceed with the
renovation of this property. Mr. Devkota added that he has the finances to proceed with the ARB
approved project. He noted the construction drawings were delayed but are now being prepared.
Mr. Devkota stated he and the City started off on the wrong foot and that he is pained that the
City’s minutes reflect his property as a repeat nuisance offender. He noted his in-person
attendance to the public hearing was to demonstrate his commitment to being a part of this
community and his desire to raise his family in this neighborhood. Mr. Devkota apologized for
the current status of the matter and added he attempted to pay for the nuisance abatement directly
prior to the public hearing and would pay them without contest. He noted he selected to turn off
the water system and winterize the pipes because the property was unoccupied and vacant in cold
weather. Mr. Devkota suggested setting a date by which the building permit at his property be
issued as a remediation step and signal of confidence to the Council.
Mayor Dickey thanked Mr. Devkota for attending the public hearing in person, which
demonstrates commitment to addressing the matter, and his testimony. He noted that the
challenge for the Council is there have been examples in the past where residents or potential
residents have promised to remediate issues, yet they remain for years to the detriment of the
neighboring residents. Mayor Dickey stated the Council is seeking to balance this current matter
and previous experiences in the City in a way that is fair to all parties.
Ms. Krstulic clarified that the purpose of this public hearing is not to address any of the
outstanding nuisance items, but to address the minimum building standards, which is a different
section of Code. She noted in recognition of the fact that Mr. Devkota intends to begin a project,
the draft Resolution No. 2022-K proposes two alternatives, either the water supply is required to
be turned on and property is compliance with the minimum standards or purchase the building
permit for the proposed renovation within a timeframe determined by the Council. Mr. Devkota
opined a reasonable timeframe to purchase the building permit, as determined by the Council,
2
would benefit the progression of his project. Mayor Dickey asked Mr. Devkota what a
reasonable timeframe would be for the Council to set. Mr. Devkota noted his discussions with
the architect and replied that construction drawings could be provided in 21 to 30 days and the
building permit would then be purchased immediately upon City approval. He added that while
materials are on order, the demolition of the interior could be completed within 30 days of the
building permit being issued. Councilperson Bruning noted the proposed timeframe and
suggested the building permit could be purchased in advance of the May 9, 2022 Council
meeting. Ms. Lee noted for instance that if the construction drawings were received by April 22nd
or April 29th the City Inspector could review the drawings in two to three business days and
determine whether additional information is required. She noted that generally staff allows for
two weeks for construction drawing review, but in this matter the review timeframe would be
expedited. Mayor Dickey agreed with Councilperson Bruning and suggested the last day of the
timeframe to purchase the building permit be May 9, 2022 so that if necessary the Council could
take additional action at the May meeting. Mr. Devkota noted the construction drawing review
process and if there should be concern of delay. Ms. Lee replied this is typically a standardized
process with the City Architect reviewing that the drawings match the ARB approval and the
City Inspector reviewing for Code compliance.
Councilperson Bruning noted he has been contacted by more than one resident in this
neighborhood that there is concern about property maintenance and asked if the yard would be
maintained as an occupied residence. Mr. Devkota replied yes. Councilperson Bruning asked if
moving forward if Mr. Devkota would be more responsive to City communications. Mr. Devkota
replied that mailed communication issues have been resolved and he will be responsive with
phone communications with staff. Councilperson Bruning asked if Mr. Devkota would be
responsive and address any property issues presented to him moving forward. He stated he could
engage a lawn care company to ensure that the property was maintained. He added during
construction the property will be more difficult to maintain. Mayor Dickey agreed and noted that
the neighborhood will be more understanding during the construction process because progress is
being made.
Mayor Dickey asked if there was a motion. Councilperson Bruning moved to approve Resolution
No. 2022-K and that the owner complete necessary improvements to meet the Minimum
Standards or obtain a building permit on or before May 9, 2022. Councilperson Thorne
seconded. Approved 4-0.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 12:32 p.m.
/s/ Meghan Woolbright, City Clerk
3
Agenda
MISSION HILLS CITY COUNCIL
Public Hearing
April 1, 2022
12 pm
I. Public Hearing to determine whether the structure located at 2517 W. 68th Street
should be condemned and ordered repaired or demolished pursuant to K.S.A.
12-1750 et seq. and Section 5-301 et seq. of the City Code.
II. Adjourn
Get email alerts for Mission Hills
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.