Architectural Review Committee Meeting
Regular MeetingMonterey, CA · May 15, 2013
Minutes
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
AFTERNOON SESSION ONLY
4:00 pm - 7:00 pm
FEW MEMORIAL HALL OF RECORDS, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
Members Present: Hill, Davis, Dawson, Jacoubowsky, Latasa, Sullivan
Members Absent: None
Staff Members Present: Senior Associate Planner Christine Hopper, City Forester
Robert Reid, Recording Secretary Halabi
CALL TO ORDER
CONSENT ITEMS
Committee Member Hill requested to move item #3 off the Consent Agenda to allow for
further discussion.
On a motion by Committee Member Hill, seconded by Committee Member> Dawson, and
carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee approved the
CONSENT ITEMS:
AYES: 6 MEMBERS: Hill , Davis, Dawson, Jacoubowsky, Latasa, Sullivan
NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None
RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None
Approval of Minutes
1. April 17, 2013
ACTION: Approved as Amended.
Committee Member Hill requested item #4, reflect the correct titles for members Vice
Chair Bartram and Committee Member Sullivan.
Committee Member Hill also requested the motion for 1375 Josselyn Canyon Road
Agenda Item be altered to reflect that the findings for approval would be returned to the
Architectural Review Committee for approval.
Committee Member Jacoubowsky said he would like the minutes to reflect that he
recused himself from the item and Committee Member Latasa was absent.
2. May 1, 2013
ACTION: Approved as Amended.
Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, May 15, 2013
Committee Member Hill requested item #9 be altered to reflect that Committee Member
Dawson's motion was seconded by Committee Member Davis.
***End of Consent Agenda***
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
PUBLIC APPEARANCE
3. Adopt Resolution with Findings for Approval of a New Vehicle Oriented
Freestanding Sign at 1375 Josselyn Canyon Road
ACTION: Adopt Resolution with Findings for Approval of a New Vehicle Oriented
Freestanding Sign at 1375 Josselyn Canyon Road
Committee Member Jacoubowsky recused himself from the item.
Committee Member Dawson said approval of this resolution is not binding for future
projects and will not set a precedent. He said the proposed location of the sign is a
unique corner with numerous vertical elements.
Committee Member Latasa said, had he been present for the meeting, he would have
voted against the item. He said approving signage that points toward a scenic highway
is serious. He said the resolution needs to reflect this will not set precedence and he
noted the applicant’s name needs to be altered from Dennis Hodgin to Daryl Hawkins.
Committee Member Davis made a motion to adopt the Resolution with the following
amended findings:
Freestanding Signs – Vehicle Oriented
A. There should be no more than one vehicle-oriented freestanding sign per
street frontage. This property already has two such signs. However, the
corner of the site is uniquely a frontage because it delineates itself separately
from the frontages of the other two streets. Therefore, the location of the sign
on the corner is appropriate.
Committee Member Sullivan seconded the motion.
Committee Member Dawson said he still has trouble considering the cross as a sign.
On a motion by Committee Member Davis, seconded by Committee Member Sullivan,
and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee Adopted a
Resolution with Findings for Approval of a New Vehicle Oriented Freestanding Sign at
1375 Josselyn Canyon Road.
AYES: 4 MEMBERS: Davis, Dawson, Sullivan
NOES: 1 MEMBERS: Hill
ABSENT: 0 MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 MEMBERS: Latasa
RECUSED: 1 MEMBERS: Jacoubowsky
2
Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, May 15, 2013
4. Consider 867 Pine Street; AR Application 13-119 for Preliminary Architectural
Review and Tree Permit for the Removal of Three Coast Live Oak Trees; Applicant
Roy Poss; Owner Philip and Kristine Edington; R-1-5 Zoning District; Exempt from
CEQA Requirements.
ACTION: Continued the item with direction to the applicant relocate the house
approximately 10 feet toward the rear of the property and redesign as necessary to
accommodate retention of the trees on the site, reduce the width of the front stairs
to four feet at each flight, redesign the chimney for the direct vent fireplaces to
look like a true chimney and direct the venting up toward the roof, add more
windows on the south elevation to create more articulation to break up the
unrelieved wall and to take advantage of the southern sun exposure.
Staff Presentation/Committee Member Questions:
Christine Hopper Presented the Agenda Report and answered Committee Members'
questions.
Applicant:
Roy Poss, applicant, said the home is currently three feet and six inches away from the
tree in question, moving further toward the rear of the property would result in the loss
two trees in the backyard.
Public Comment:
Sharon Dwight, President of the New Monterey Neighborhood Association, said, in
genera,l properties in the New Monterey Area have 20 foot setbacks. She said setting
the house back further would make the property more consistent with the character of the
neighborhood. She expressed that the New Monterey Neighborhood Association would
rather see a loss in square footage than to see the loss of trees. Ms. Dwight also
suggested that design incorporate additional interest and lighting.
Committee Member Comments:
Committee Member Jacoubowsky said the large oak tree in the front yard has a greater
positive impact on the neighborhood than the trees located in the rear of the property,
therefore, moving the house back should be one of the primary considerations.
Committee Member Latasa suggested narrowing the front staircase to help mitigate the
need to remove the tree. Committee Member Jacoubowsky concurred with Committee
Member Latasa's suggestion and said making alterations to the staircase would result in
an easier transformation and avoid a major redesign.
Committee Member Sullivan said the fireplace should be built as an element within the
house.
Committee Member Davis said he would like the item to return to the Architectural
Review Committee (ARC) for further review if the staircase were to be altered.
Committee Member Latasa made a motion to continue the item with direction to the
applicant relocate the house approximately 10 feet toward the rear of the property and
redesign as necessary to accommodate retention of the trees on the site, reduce the
width of the front stairs to four feet at each flight, redesign the chimney for the direct vent
fireplaces to look like a true chimney and direct the venting up toward the roof, add more
windows on the south elevation to create more articulation to break up the unrelieved
wall and to take advantage of the southern sun exposure.
3
Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, May 15, 2013
On a motion by Committee Member Latasa, seconded by Committee Member> Davis,
and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee Continued the item
with direction to the applicant relocate the house approximately 10 feet toward the rear of
the property and redesign as necessary to accommodate retention of the trees on the
site, reduce the width of the front stairs to four feet at each flight, redesign the chimney
for the direct vent fireplaces to look like a true chimney and direct the venting up toward
the roof, add more windows on the south elevation to create more articulation to break up
the unrelieved wall and to take advantage of the southern sun exposure.
AYES: 6 MEMBERS: Hill, Davis, Dawson, Jacoubowsky, Latasa, Sullivan
NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None
RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None
5. Consider 843 Via Mirada; Tree Removal Permit 13-166 for Removal of One
Monterey Pine Tree; Applicant Wendy and David LaRiviere; Owner Tom and Laura
Hibert; R-E-20-D1 Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA Requirements
Mike Dawson recused himself from the item due to a conflict of interest.
Staff Presentation:
Christine Hopper presented the Agenda Report and answered Committee Members'
questions.
Applicant:
Dave and Wendy LaRiviere requested that a tree, located on the neighboring property,
be removed. Mr. LaRiviere said that their master bedroom is being threatened by the
presence of the tree, which is leaning toward their property. He said the tree has
caused significant uplift causing their gate to scrape, and fallen limbs have resulted in
loss of television and internet service.
Committee Member Davis asked the applicant if they had considered pruning back the
branches. In response to Committee Member Davis' question, the Mr. LaRiviere said
they had requested the removal of a large tree branch but the City Forester denied their
request.
Public Comment:
None.
Committee Member Comments:
Committee Member Latasa said although the tree is prominent and aesthetically
appealing, he cannot ignore the anxiety of the applicant and is therefore in support of
granting the appeal.
Committee Member Hill asked for further detail about the applicant owning the
neighboring property and not the lot that contains the tree in question. In response to
Committee Member Hill's inquiry, Ms. Hopper said approval will not require that the
property owner remove the tree, it will simply allow them to do so.
Committee Member Davis made a motion to approve the appeal to remove the tree with
the finding that due to the extent of the concern and anxiety and the degree of damage
4
Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, May 15, 2013
the tree roots are causing to the neighboring property, approval to remove the tree is
appropriate.
and added Condition of Approval:
Special:
1. That, the Monterey Pine tree approved for removal will require a one-for-one
replacement, the size (container size and/or diameter of tree) and location to be
determined by the City’s Urban Forester.
Committee Member Latasa seconded the motion.
On a motion by Committee Member Davis, seconded by Committee Member Latasa, and
carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee approve the appeal to
remove the tree with added Conditions of Approval.
AYES: 3 MEMBERS: Latasa, Davis, Sullivan
NOES: 2 MEMBERS: Hill, Jacoubowsky
ABSENT: 0 MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS:
RECUSED: 1 MEMBERS: Dawson
6. Consider 135 Spray Avenue; AR Application 13-056 for Preliminary and Final
Architectural Review for Exterior Alterations and Addition of Second Story Rear
Deck; Applicant Paul W. Davis; Owner Andrea Olsen; R-1-6-D1 District; Exempt
from CEQA Requirements.
ACTION: Adopted a resolution approving Preliminary and Final Architectural
Review with Conditions of Approval.
Committee Member Davis recused himself from the item.
Staff Presentation/Committee Member Questions:
Christine Hopper presented the Agenda Report and answered Committee Members'
questions.
Applicant:
Paul W. Davis, on behalf of Andrea Wilson, said the intention is to update the house from
T1-11 siding to a low maintenance option. He said the reason for the reverse floor plan is
that the property owner wants to take advantage of the view of the peninsula.
Public Comment:
None.
Committee Member Comments:
Committee Member Latasa said the project is of great design and there are no obvious
view issues.
Committee Member Jacoubowsky made a motion to adopt the Resolution approving
Preliminary and Final Architectural Review with Conditions of Approval.
5
Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, May 15, 2013
On a motion by Committee Member Jacoubowsky, seconded by Committee Member
Dawson, and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee Adopted
a Resolution approving Preliminary and Final Architectural Review with Conditions of
Approval.
AYES: 5 MEMBERS: Hill, Dawson, Jacoubowsky, Latasa, Sullivan
NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None
RECUSED: 1 MEMBERS: Davis
7. Consider 763 Wave Street; Sign Permit 13-129 for a Multitenant Sign Program;
Applicant Anjanette Adams for Monterey Signs; Owner Cannery Row Company; C-
2 Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA Requirements.
ACTION: Adopted a Resolution approving a Sign Permit for a multitenant sign
program with added Conditions of Approval.
Staff Report/Committee Member Questions:
Christine Hopper presented the Agenda Report and answered Committee Members'
questions.
Applicant:
John Pisto said he has occupied this property for 45 years, over these years they have
included additions to the business designating it as a true steakhouse. Mr. Pisto said
they would like to highlight the food choices at their business with new signs.
Frank Donangelo, Cannery Row Company, said they support the new signs. Mr.
Donangelo said the site is unique in that there is not heavy foot traffic and the building is
isolated from many of the other attractions on Cannery Row.
Public Comment:
Sharon Dwight, New Monterey Neighborhood Association President, said that the
Neighborhood Association has historically taken opposition to signs that exceed City
standards, but in this case they think the scale is appropriate. Ms. Dwight noted the
neighborhood association would like to see greater rational in the resolution as to why
the signs are being approved outside the standards.
Committee Member Comments:
Committee Member Davis said the additional signage is justifiable due to the double
frontage of the building.
Committee Member Hill made a motion to adopt a Resolution approving a Sign Permit for
a multitenant sign program with added Conditions of Approval as follows:
Special:
6. That the proposed signs for The Whaling Station are approved as part of this project.
Committee Member Dawson seconded the motion.
6
Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, May 15, 2013
On a motion by Committee Member Hill, seconded by Committee Member Dawson, and
carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee Adopted a resolution
approving Preliminary and Final Architectural Review with Conditions of Approval.
AYES: 6 MEMBERS: Hill, Dawson, Jacoubowsky, Latasa, Sullivan, Davis
NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None
RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None
CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS
COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS
Committee Member Dawson said the Association for Monterey Bay Area Preservationists
(AMAP) cultural landscape event is available on DVD.
Committee Member Sullivan said he is not in favor of the aluminum store front on the
Regency Theater building on Alvarado Street.
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
Christine Hopper reminded the Committee Members that the Council Chamber would
undergo Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) upgrades beginning June 5, 2013.
8. June 11, 2013- Joint Planning Commission/ Architectural Review Committee
Meeting
Ms. Hopper notified the committee that the June 11, 2013 Planning Commission evening
session would be a joint meeting with the ARC to discuss the Van Buren Senior Housing
Project.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 6:18 PM.
Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Chair
Architectural Review Committee
7
Agenda
Architectural Review Committee
Agenda Committee Members
Jonathan Hill, Chair
Regular Meeting Gordon Bartram, Vice Chair
Paul E. Davis
Mike Dawson
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 Boris Jacoubowsky
Terry Latasa
Few Memorial Hall of Records AFTERNOON SESSION ONLY James Sullivan
Council Chambers 4:00 pm - 7:00 pm
580 Pacific Street
Monterey, California
FIELD TRIP
The Architectural Review Committee will conduct a field trip Monday, May 13, 2013 to
review the Wednesday, May 15, 2013 Architectural Review Committee Agenda. The
Architectural Review Committee will depart for the field from behind Colton Hall at 4:00 PM.
For information call (831) 646-3885. Date Posted: May 10, 2013.
CALL TO ORDER
CONSENT ITEMS
CONSENT ITEMS allow for a review of those items recommended for approval on consent or
recommended to be continued, tabled or withdrawn, etc. Consent items consist of those items
which are routine and for which a staff recommendation has been prepared. A member of the
public or a Committee Member may request that an item recommended for approval on consent
be heard on the regular agenda for further discussion.
Approval of Minutes
1. April 17, 2013
2. May 1, 2013
Other Consent Items
3. Adopt Resolution with Findings for Approval of a New Vehicle Oriented
Freestanding Sign at 1375 Josselyn Canyon Road
***End of Consent Agenda***
PUBLIC COMMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS. At this time, the public may speak for a maximum of three minutes on any
subject which is within the jurisdiction of the Monterey Architectural Review Committee and which
is not on the agenda. Any person or group desiring to bring an item to the attention of the
Committee may do so during Public Comments or by addressing a letter of explanation to the
Committee, City Hall, Monterey, CA 93940. Public Comments are taken during the afternoon
session and continued at the evening session. Individuals may choose to speak once for up to
three minutes at either session, but not both.
PUBLIC APPEARANCE
PUBLIC APPEARANCE items are reports on action or informational issues that might stimulate
public discussion, but that do not require formal noticing as public hearings. You are welcome to
offer your comments after being recognized by the Chair. The Chair may limit the time allocated to
each speaker.
4. Consider 867 Pine Street; AR Application 13-119 for Preliminary Architectural
Review and Tree Permit for the Removal of Three Coast Live Oak Trees; Applicant
Roy Poss; Owner Philip and Kristine Edington; R-1-5 Zoning District; Exempt from
CEQA Requirements.
5. Consider 843 Via Mirada; Tree Removal Permit 13-166 for Removal of One Monterey
Pine Tree; Applicant Wendy and David LaRiviere; Owner Tom and Laura Hibert; R-
E-20-D1 Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA Requirements
6. Consider 135 Spray Avenue; AR Application 13-056 for Preliminary and Final
Architectural Review for Exterior Alterations and Addition of Second Story Rear
Deck; Applicant Paul W. Davis; Owner Andrea Olsen; R-1-6-D1 District; Exempt
from CEQA Requirements.
7. Consider 763 Wave Street; Sign Permit 13-129 for a Multitenant Sign Program;
Applicant Anjanette Adams for Monterey Signs; Owner Cannery Row Company; C-2
Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA Requirements.
CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS
CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS. At this time, the public may speak for a maximum of three
minutes on any subject which is within the jurisdiction of the Monterey Architectural Review
Committee and which is not on the agenda. Any person or group desiring to bring an item to the
attention of the Committee may do so during Public Comments or by addressing a letter of
explanation to the Committee, City Hall, Monterey, CA 93940. Public Comments are taken during
the afternoon session and continued at the evening session. Individuals may choose to speak
once for up to three minutes at either session, but not both.
COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS
COMMITTEE MEMBERS may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or
make a brief report on his or her activities. In addition, a Committee Member may provide a
referral to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back to the body
at a subsequent meeting concerning any City matter, or direct staff to place a request to agendize
a matter of business on a future agenda. (G.C. 54954.2)
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS supply information on activities or
announcements and may request clarification or direction regarding the scheduling of meetings
and study sessions.
8. June 11, 2013- Joint Planning Commission/ Architectural Review Committee
Meeting
ADJOURNMENT
ADJOURNMENT — The general policy of the Architectural Review Committee is that the Afternoon
Session will end no later than 5:30 p.m. and the Evening Session will end no later than 11:00 p.m. Any
public agenda items that have not been completed within the designated adjournment time may be
formally extended by the Committee, or continued to the next regularly scheduled Architectural Review
Committee Meeting, or continued to a Special Meeting.
Agenda packets may be reviewed by the public in the Monterey Public Library, in the Planning Office,
or on the web at http://www.monterey.org beginning late Friday afternoon prior to the date of the
meeting.
Members of the public have the right to address the Committee on any Agenda items. The Chair will
formally open the floor for public comment. However, if you wish to speak to items during "Consent
Architectural Review Committee
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
2
Agenda" or "Staff Informational Report," please advise the staff or the Chair prior to the action on that
item and you will be recognized. Notification as much in advance as possible is appreciated.
Information distributed to the Committee at the meeting becomes part of the public record. A copy of
written material, pictures, etc. should be provided to the Secretary for this purpose.
Architectural Review Committee decisions may be appealed within ten (10) days from the date of the
decision on forms available in the Planning Division during business hours. When the tenth day falls
on a weekend or a holiday, the appeal deadline date is the next working day following the holiday or
weekend. An appeal fee will apply. For more agenda information, call the Planning Office at 831/646-
3885.
CITY OF MONTEREY'S 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES:
Voicemail: 646-3799
FAX: 646-3793
Email: suggest@ci.monterey.ca.us
WebPage: http://www.monterey.org
The City of Monterey is committed to include the disabled in all of its services, programs and
activities. For disabled access to the City, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS)
to speak to City offices. CRS offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-
language services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you require a hearing amplification
device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-
3935 to coordinate use of a device or for information on an agenda.
UPCOMING MEETINGS AT CITY HALL
May 16 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 7:00 PM
May 20 CHM-CAC Meeting Cancellation Notice, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
May 21 Council Regular Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
May 22 Library Board Meeting, Library Community Room - 5:00 PM
May 23 Zoning Administrator Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
May 23 MP Regional Water Authority Meeting, Council Chamber - 7:00 PM
May 27 City Holiday, City Offices Closed - 8:00 AM
May 28 Planning Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
May 29 Council Special Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
Jun 4 Council Regular Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
Jun 5 Architectural Review Committee Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Jun 11 Planning Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Jun 13 Zoning Administrator Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Jun 13 Historic Preservation Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Jun 13 MP Regional Water Authority Meeting, Council Chamber - 7:00 PM
Jun 18 Council Regular Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
Architectural Review Committee
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
3
Jun 19 Architectural Review Committee Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Jun 20 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 7:00 PM
Jun 24 Colton Hall Museum Cultural Art Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Jun 25 Planning Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
MORE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE BY CALLING 646-3885
Architectural Review Committee
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
4
Get email alerts for Monterey
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.