Architectural Review Committee Meeting
Regular MeetingMonterey, CA · November 13, 2013
Minutes
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
SPECIAL MEETING
4:00 PM - 7:00 PM
FEW MEMORIAL HALL OF RECORDS, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
Members Present: Sullivan, Dawson, Freeman, Jacoubowsky, Silva
Members Absent: Latasa, Kimzey
Staff Members Present: Principal Planner Caraker, Principal Planner Kinison Brown,
Recording Secretary Nelson
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Sullivan called the meeting to order at 4:00 pm.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
PUBLIC APPEARANCE
1. Consider Recommendation to the Planning Commission Regarding the North
Fremont Specific Plan (Continued from the November 6, 2013 meeting)
ACTION: Adopted a resolution recommending that the Planning Commission recommend
that the City Council adopt the North Fremont Specific Plan with amendments
Committee Member Dawson gave a presentation to the Committee regarding his participation on
the North Fremont Specific Plan subcommittee. He said the most important issue to be
discussed regarding the Plan is how building height is measured.
Staff Presentation
Elizabeth Caraker presented the Agenda Report and answered Committee Members’ questions.
Committee Member Questions
Committee Member Dawson said that height should be measured either by plate height or roof
height. Committee Member Silva concurred.
Committee Member Silva said that shadow impacts should be considered instead of sunlight
impacts.
Committee Member Jacoubowsky suggested requiring a shadow study with a specific
measurement date. Committee Member Silva said that would be an objective way to measure
shadows. Committee member Dawson concurred.
Committee Member Silva said that the North Fremont Specific Plan is a hybrid document
because it includes both form-based and numerical measurement guidelines and standards.
Committee Member Dawson said that he does not support 40 foot buildings on Bruce Lane.
Committee Member Silva said that the terms “inappropriate” and “appropriate” in the Plan should
be replaced with “encourage” and “discourage”. Chair Sullivan concurred.
Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, November 13, 2013
Committee Member Dawson said that Standard S.2.9.4 regarding open space should be a
guideline and not a standard. Committee Member Silva concurred that very specific quantitative
dimensions should be written as objectives and not standards.
Jacoubowsky said that the image on page 54 should be updated to better reflect open spaces.
He also said they should be accessible from the North Fremont Street and not the side streets.
Committee Member Silva said there should be a principle guideline in the Plan to orient outdoor
spaces to gain maximum sunlight.
Paul Davis, Planning Commission Member and North Fremont Specific Plan Subcommittee
Member clarified open space and Standard S.2.9.
Committee Member Silva said that Objective O.2.8 does not include standards, just objectives.
He also said there should be a definition for “usable open space” and that balcony size
requirements should be approved on an individual process basis.
Committee Member Jacoubowsky said there should be a guideline requiring the use of materials
tied to the architecture of the building for trash enclosures.
In response to Committee Member Freeman’s question regarding provisions for event-based
parking, Ms. Caraker said the Plan recommends the Fairgrounds working with area businesses
to provide extra parking for events.
Committee Member Jacoubowsky said that the standard of one space per studios and one
bedroom apartments should be increased to 1.5 spaces. Committee Member Freeman said that
increasing the requirement to 1.5 spaces would help to draw people to the area and help meet
ADA standards.
Chair Sullivan said he supports the requirement of one parking space to encourage alternate
forms of transportation.
In response to Committee Member Dawson’s question regarding parking, Ms. Caraker said that
the Plan can be amended after approval if it creates negative impacts on the community.
Committee Member Silva recommended that projects undergo a parking study as a Condition of
Approval if only one parking space is proposed.
Public Comment
Mike Brassfield, Casanova Oak Knoll Board of Directors, said he supports the use of shadow
studies as opposed to sunlight studies. He said one to two spaces per bedroom is appropriate,
however additional parking is necessary with mixed-use buildings. Mr. Brassfield said any open
spaces added to the North Fremont Specific Plan area would be beneficial and appreciated.
Jerry Anderson said that it would be possible to build a 40 foot structure that fronts North
Fremont and backs onto Bruce Lane with minimal impact to adjacent residences and encourages
the Committee not to eliminate that part of the Plan, but to look at projects on a case by case
basis. He also suggested one parking space for studios, 1.5 spaces for one bedroom and 2
spaces for two bedrooms.
Mary Alice Cerrito Fettis, North Fremont Street Property owner, said she thoroughly supports
Specific Plan and agrees with Mr. Anderson regarding height and parking requirements.
2
Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, November 13, 2013
Continued Committee Member Comments
Committee Member Silva said that he does not agree with restricting building height to 40 feet
and that buildings should be reviewed individually. Committee Member Jacoubowsky said that
when site topography is known it is not a problem staying within the 40 foot height maximum.
In response to Committee Member Silva’s question, Mr. Davis said determining building height
by averaging grades was not discussed as part of the plan because it is not a measurement
method used in other areas of the City.
Committee Member Silva said that building height should be determined by averaging the grade
levels.
Committee Member Jacoubowsky said he does not support placing buildings at the back of the
sidewalk because it does not support the vision of Monterey and is more appropriate in an urban
area.
Committee Member Freeman said she supports the Plan’s addition of open spaces, bike lanes,
and wider sidewalks as they will enrich the North Fremont Street area.
Chair Sullivan said the graphics for roof guidelines should be changed to reflect gable and hip
roofs.
Committee Member Silva said that eclectic contemporary is not reflected in the first bullets of
Guidelines G.3.8. and G.3.1. He also said the character areas should be clarified with specific
design themes on page 31 and that the 30-40 foot guideline should be eliminated in Guideline
G.3.3. All Committee Members present concurred.
Committee Member Silva also said the height measurements of buildings should be based on
stories instead of feet. Committee Member Freeman said a guideline should be made requiring
three stories or a certain height, whichever is less.
Committee member Silva said the word “appropriate” should be removed from Guideline G.4.1.
He also said the word “inappropriate” should be changed to “discouraged” in Guideline G.4.5. All
Committee Members present concurred.
Committee member Freeman said an objective preventing lights from interfering with the airport
should be added to the Plan.
Dawson suggested that Standard S.5.1. be changed to reflect that exposed bulbs without shields
are prohibited.
Committee Member Jacoubowsky said Guideline G.6.6. should say that signs “may remain
unchanged” as opposed to “should remain unchanged.”
Committee Member Silva said that some of the existing pole signs are artful and language should
be added to the North Fremont Specific Plan allowing historic pole signs to stay in place.
Continued Public Comment
Mike Brassfield said that the North Fremont Specific Plan area has some of the most densely
populated neighborhoods in Monterey, and creating buildings over two stories in residential areas
will adversely affect the current neighborhood occupants. He also said that waiving parking fees
3
Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, November 13, 2013
for properties diminishes the impacts of the parking requirements on the properties.
Jerry Anderson said that there are no incentives for property owners to tear down and create new
buildings, and that the housing density is needed to draw people in. He also said that the Plan’s
form-based approach has the strength and flexibility to get the right type of development on North
Fremont Street.
Continued Committee Member Comments
Committee Member Silva suggested staff create a three dimensional model displaying the
building heights and masses of the North Fremont Specific Plan.
In response to Committee Member Dawson’s question, Mr. Davis said that the size of the parcels
in the Plan area prevents underground parking.
Committee member Silva made a motion for averaging the grades at the building corners.
On a motion by Committee Member Silva, seconded by Committee Member Dawson, and carried
by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee amended the North Fremont Specific
Plan to average grades at the building corners; to determine building height measurements:
AYES: 5 MEMBERS: Sullivan, Dawson, Freeman, Jacoubowsky, Silva
NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 MEMBERS: Latasa, Kimzey
ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None
RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None
Committee Member Silva made a motion to strike the prescriptive measurements in Standard
S.3.1 and use form based measurements with three and four stories.
No Committee Member seconded the motion.
Committee member Dawson made a motion to change the maximum height facing North
Fremont Street in Standard S.3.1 to 25 feet.
No Committee Member seconded the motion.
Chair Sullivan made a motion to approve the height as it’s described in Standards S.3.1-S.3.4 as
written.
On a motion by Chair Sullivan, seconded by Committee Member Freeman, and carried by the
following vote, the Architectural Review Committee voted to approve the height as described in
Standards S.3.1 through S.3.4 as written:
AYES: 3 MEMBERS: Sullivan, Dawson, Freeman
NOES: 3 MEMBERS: Dawson, Jacoubowsky, Silva
ABSENT: 2 MEMBERS: Latasa, Kimzey
ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None
RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None
The motion failed.
Committee Member Dawson said that the parking should be changed to one space for studios
and 1.5 for one bedroom, with a parking study required for one space with two bedrooms.
4
Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, November 13, 2013
Ms Caraker and Mr. Kinison Brown summarized the changes to the North Fremont Specific Plan
agreed upon by the Committee.
Committee Member Dawson made a motion to adopt a resolution recommending that the
Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt the North Fremont Specific Plan
with the amendments as follows:
Usable open space will be defined and distinguish the residential requirement
from the plaza areas with the 15 foot dimensions
The graphics on pages 53 and 54 will be fixed
Sunlight study will be changed to shadow study
The words “appropriate” and “inappropriate” will be changed to “encourage”
and “discourage” throughout the guidelines
Clarification will be added to page 56 that trash enclosures will be made of
materials drawing from the building and that screening will be added.
No side setbacks for the accessory structures will be needed
The requirement of parking spaces will be changed to 1 space for studios and
1.5 spaces for one bedroom apartments.
50 foot buildings will be limited to the south side of North Fremont Street
Height will be measured by averaging grades of building corners
G.3.3 and the first bullet of G.3.8, which reads “A base, middle and cap into the
building design,” will be eliminated.
Graphics depicting roofs in the plan will be changed from flat roofs to gabled
roofs
The word “appropriate” will be eliminated in Standard S.4.1 and “inappropriate”
will be changed to “discouraged” in S.4.5
The standard regarding exposed bulbs will be eliminated
Other examples of signs will be included in the Plan
The word “should” will be changed to “may” in the document regarding
location of signs.
On a motion by Committee Member Dawson, seconded by Committee Member Sullivan, and
carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee Adopted a resolution
recommending that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt the North
Fremont Specific Plan with amendments:
AYES: 5 MEMBERS: Sullivan, Dawson, Freeman, Jacoubowsky,
Silva
NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 MEMBERS: Latasa, Kimzey
ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None
RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None
5
Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, November 13, 2013
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7:34 pm.
Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Taven Kinison Brown Chair
Principal Planner Architectural Review Committee
6
Agenda
Architectural Review Committee Committee Members
Agenda James Sullivan, Chair
Terry Latasa, Vice Chair
Mike Dawson
Sandra Freeman
Boris Jacoubowsky
Wednesday, November 13, 2013 Charles Kimzey
Few Memorial Hall of Record Peter Silva
Council Chambers SPECIAL MEETING
580 Pacific Street 4:00 PM - 7:00 PM
Monterey, California
FIELD TRIP
The Architectural Review Committee will not conduct a field trip Friday, November 8, 2013
to review the Wednesday, November 13, 2013 Architectural Review Committee Agenda.
For information call (831) 646-3885. Date Posted: November 8, 2013.
CALL TO ORDER
CONSENT ITEMS
CONSENT ITEMS allow for a review of those items recommended for approval on consent or
recommended to be continued, tabled or withdrawn, etc. Consent items consist of those items
which are routine and for which a staff recommendation has been prepared. A member of the
public or a Committee Member may request that an item recommended for approval on consent
be heard on the regular agenda for further discussion.
***End of Consent Agenda***
PUBLIC COMMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS. At this time, the public may speak for a maximum of three minutes on any
subject which is within the jurisdiction of the Monterey Architectural Review Committee and which
is not on the agenda. Any person or group desiring to bring an item to the attention of the
Committee may do so during Public Comments or by addressing a letter of explanation to the
Committee, City Hall, Monterey, CA 93940. Public Comments are taken during the afternoon
session and continued at the evening session. Individuals may choose to speak once for up to
three minutes at either session, but not both.
PUBLIC APPEARANCE
PUBLIC APPEARANCE items are reports on action or informational issues that might stimulate
public discussion, but that do not require formal noticing as public hearings. You are welcome to
offer your comments after being recognized by the Chair. The Chair may limit the time allocated to
each speaker.
1. Consider Recommendation to the Planning Commission Regarding the North
Fremont Specific Plan (Continued from the November 6, 2013 meeting)
CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS
CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS. At this time, the public may speak for a maximum of three
minutes on any subject which is within the jurisdiction of the Monterey Architectural Review
Committee and which is not on the agenda. Any person or group desiring to bring an item to the
attention of the Committee may do so during Public Comments or by addressing a letter of
explanation to the Committee, City Hall, Monterey, CA 93940. Public Comments are taken during
the afternoon session and continued at the evening session. Individuals may choose to speak
once for up to three minutes at either session, but not both.
COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS
COMMITTEE MEMBERS may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or
make a brief report on his or her activities. In addition, a Committee Member may provide a
referral to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back to the body
at a subsequent meeting concerning any City matter, or direct staff to place a request to agendize
a matter of business on a future agenda. (G.C. 54954.2)
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS supply information on activities or
announcements and may request clarification or direction regarding the scheduling of meetings
and study sessions.
ADJOURNMENT
ADJOURNMENT — Any public agenda items that have not been completed within the designated
adjournment time may be formally extended by the Committee, or continued to the next regularly
scheduled Architectural Review Committee Meeting, or continued to a Special Meeting.
Agenda packets may be reviewed by the public in the Monterey Public Library, in the Planning Office,
or on the web at http://www.monterey.org beginning late Friday afternoon prior to the date of the
meeting.
Members of the public have the right to address the Committee on any Agenda items. The Chair will
formally open the floor for public comment. However, if you wish to speak to items during "Consent
Agenda" or "Staff Informational Report," please advise the staff or the Chair prior to the action on that
item and you will be recognized. Notification as much in advance as possible is appreciated.
Information distributed to the Committee at the meeting becomes part of the public record. A copy of
written material, pictures, etc. should be provided to the Secretary for this purpose.
Architectural Review Committee decisions may be appealed within ten (10) days from the date of the
decision on forms available in the Planning Division during business hours. When the tenth day falls
on a weekend or a holiday, the appeal deadline date is the next working day following the holiday or
weekend. An appeal fee will apply. For more agenda information, call the Planning Office at 831/646-
3885.
CITY OF MONTEREY'S 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES:
Voicemail: 646-3799
FAX: 646-3793
Email: suggest@ci.monterey.ca.us
WebPage: http://www.monterey.org
The City of Monterey is committed to include the disabled in all of its services, programs and
activities. For disabled access to the City, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS)
to speak to City offices. CRS offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-
language services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you require a hearing amplification
device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-
3935 to coordinate use of a device or for information on an agenda.
UPCOMING MEETINGS AT CITY HALL
Nov 14 Zoning Administrator Meeting, Monterey Public Library - 4:00 pm
Nov 14 Historic Preservation Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Nov 14 MP Regional Water Authority Meeting, Council Chamber - 7:00 PM
Nov 18 MP Regional Water Authority TAC Meeting, Council Chamber - 10:00 AM
Architectural Review Committee
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
2
Nov 19 Council Regular Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
Nov 20 Architectural Review Committee Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Nov 21 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 7:00 PM
Nov 25 Colton Hall Museum Cultural Art Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Nov 26 Planning Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Nov 27 Zoning Administrator Meeting, Monterey Public Library - 4:00 pm
Nov 27 Oversight Board Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
Nov 28 City Holiday, City Offices Closed - 8:00 AM
Nov 28 MP Regional Water Authority Meeting, Council Chamber - 7:00 PM
Nov 29 City Holiday, City Offices Closed - 8:00 AM
Dec 2 MP Regional Water Authority TAC Meeting, Council Chamber - 10:00 AM
Dec 3 Council Regular Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
Dec 4 Architectural Review Committee Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Dec 4 Library Board Meeting, Library Community Room - 5:00 PM
Dec 10 Planning Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Dec 12 Zoning Administrator Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
MORE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE BY CALLING 646-3885
Architectural Review Committee
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
3
Get email alerts for Monterey
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.