Architectural Review Committee Meeting

MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Wednesday, September 17, 2014 AFTERNOON SESSION ONLY 4:00 pm - 7:00 pm 580 PACIFIC STREET, COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA Members Present: Latasa, Freeman, Dawson, Kimzey, Searle, Silva Members Absent: None Staff Members Present: Principal Planner Cole, Principal Planner Caraker, Senior Associate Planner Bennett, Senior Associate Planner Hopper, Recording Secretary Nelson CALL TO ORDER Chair Latasa called the meeting to order at 4:00 pm. Christine Hopper announced that Jim Sullivan resigned from his position on the Architectural Review Committee. CONSENT ITEMS Committee Member Kimzey requested that page five of the minutes to be changed to reflect that he did not support the first motion but supported the second motion of item #6. Committee Member Dawson requested that the word “change” on page four of the minutes under “Action” be corrected to say “changeable.” Committee Member Silva recused himself from item #2. Committee Member Dawson made a motion to approve the Consent Items with amendments to the minutes. Committee Member Freeman seconded the motion. On a motion by Committee Member Dawson, seconded by Committee Member Freeman, and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee approved the CONSENT ITEMS: AYES: 6 MEMBERS: Latasa, Freeman, Dawson, Kimzey, Silva (recused from item #2), Searle NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None Approval of Minutes 1. September 3, 2014 ACTION: Approved as amended. Other Consent Items  Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, September 17, 2014 Committee Member Silva recused himself from item #2. 2. Consider 442 Van Buren Street; Permit 14-343 to Amend AR Permit 14-242 for Final Architectural Review of a Building Addition for New Exterior Lights, Windows and Landscaping; Applicant Lou Bartlett, AIA (Wald, Ruhnke and Dost Architects); Owner The Presidio and Fellows of Middlebury College (Monterey Institute of International Studies); Residential Medium Density Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA ACTION: Adopted a Resolution approving Permit 14-343 to amend AR Permit 14- 242 for Final Architectural Review for exterior lights, windows and landscaping plan. 3. Consider 2200 Garden Road (Monterey Herald); Sign Permit 14-275 for a New Wall Sign; Applicant Anjanette Adams; Owner Coastal Storage; IR-130-RA Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA ACTION: Adopted a Resolution approving a Sign Permit for a new wall sign for Monterey Herald with Conditions of Approval. 4. Consider 414 Ramona Avenue; AR Permit 14-334 for Preliminary and Final Review of an Additional Dwelling Unit and Carport to be Added to an Existing 6-Unit Multi- Family Project; Applicant/Owner Peter Laughlin; R-3-15 Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA Requirements ACTION: Adopted a Resolution approving AR Permit 14-334 for Preliminary and Final Architectural Review of an additional dwelling unit and carport to be added to an existing 6-unit multi-family housing project. ***End of Consent Agenda*** PUBLIC COMMENTS None. PUBLIC APPEARANCE 5. Consider 2338 Del Monte Avenue (Mobil Gas Station); Sign Permit 14-268 for Two Free Standing Vehicle Oriented Signs and Decals and AR Permit 14-344 for Minor Exterior Modifications; Applicant Ahmand Ghaderi (A&S Engineering); Owner Tesoro Sierra Properties LLC.; C-3-D2 Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA Requirements ACTION: Continued to October 1, 2014 per applicant’s request. Ms. Hopper informed the Committee that the applicant formally requested a continuance of the project to October 1, 2014. Committee Member Silva made a motion to continue the project to the October 1, 2014. Committee Member Dawson seconded the motion. On a motion by Committee Member Silva, seconded by Committee Member Dawson, and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee continued the project to the October 1, 2014: 2  Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, September 17, 2014 AYES: 6 MEMBERS: Latasa, Freeman, Dawson, Kimzey, Searle, Silva NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None Committee Member Silva recused himself from item #6. 6. Consider 30 Wharf #1; AR Permit 14-269 for Preliminary and Final Architectural Review of Exterior Changes to an Existing Building; Applicant Kenneth Turgen, AIA (Wald, Ruhnke and Dost Architects); Owner City of Monterey; No Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA ACTION: Adopted a Resolution approving Preliminary and Final Architectural Review 14-269 for 30 Wharf #1. Staff Presentation/Committee Member Questions Kimberly Cole presented the Agenda Report and answered Committee Members’ questions. Applicant Ken Turgen, Wald, Ruhnke and Dost Architects, said the proposed project will join the front and back buildings on the site together and include a folly, coordinating colors and materials throughout, and a standing seam metal roof for seagull deterrence. Mr Turgen also said the project proposed an upstairs banquet hall that will fill a void for meeting space on Fisherman’s Wharf. Public Comments None. Committee Member Comments Committee Member Searle said the applicant did a great job creating a memorable building that will bring excitement to the area. Chair Latasa said the proposed gable shaped roof is an appropriate way to unify the buildings. Vice Chair Freeman said the proposed building is beautiful and will be an upgrade for Fisherman’s Wharf. Committee Member Searle made motion to adopt a Resolution approving Preliminary and Final Architectural Review 14-269 for 30 Wharf #1. Committee Member Kimzey seconded the motion. On a motion by Committee Member Searle, seconded by Committee Member Kimzey, and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee adopted a Resolution approving Preliminary and Final Architectural Review 14-269 for 30 Wharf #1: AYES: 5 MEMBERS: Latasa, Freeman, Dawson, Kimzey, Searle NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None RECUSED: 1 MEMBERS: Silva 3  Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, September 17, 2014 7. Consider 865 Lighthouse Avenue (Starbucks); AR Permit 14-235 for Final Architectural Review of Exterior Alterations and Site Improvements; Applicant Lisa Sunderland of SCM Solutions, LLC; Owner Ausonio Nancy Co. TRS Et Al; C-2 Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA Requirements ACTION: Adopted a Resolution approving exterior alterations and site improvements with added Conditions of Approval. Staff Presentation/Committee Member Questions Ms. Hopper presented the Agenda Report and answered Committee Members’ questions. Applicant Melissa Bodway, Starbucks Coffee, said the company is excited to change the façade on Lighthouse Avenue and showcase the area’s rich vegetation with the proposed redwood screen wall. She also said the natural earthy colors and roofing selected for the building will enhance the wood screen. In response to Committee Member Silva’s question, Ms. Bodway said the wood screen will have a marine grade matte finish throughout, with natural color variation, and that there is a maintenance program in place for the up-keep of all Starbucks locations. In response to Chair Latasa’s question, Ms. Bodway confirmed that the corners of the redwood screen will be mitered. In response to Committee Member Silva’s question regarding the bug screen, Ms. Bodway said the current design intent is to give the appearance of a rain screen, with less maintenance. She also said it will be offset from the existing wall by four inches. In response to Committee Member Searle’s question, Ms. Bodway confirmed that the planters on the Lighthouse Avenue frontage will be replaced per the previously approved landscape plan. In response to Committee Member Silva’s question, Ms. Bodway said Starbucks prefers to keep as many parking spaces as possible, but would be open to dedicating a space if the ARC sees fit. Public Comments None. Committee Member Comments Vice Chair Freeman said the 30% parking lane improvement will greatly improve the entire project. Chair Latasa concurred. Committee Member Silva said he supports the project, with the exception of the hazardous parking space, which should be dedicated to motorcycle parking. Committee Member Kimzey said he supports having a dedicated motorcycle space, but does not support the ARC requesting additional requirements after the applicant met all previous requirements. Chair Latasa said the bulb-out requirement was fulfilled, however its size is not satisfactory to prevent vulnerable situations. Committee Member Searle said the bulb- out improves hazard in one area but creates hazard in another. 4  Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, September 17, 2014 Committee Member Silva made motion to adopt a Resolution approving exterior alterations and site improvements with added Conditions of Approval as follows: 8. That the parking space closest to the drive thru and new bulb-out out shall be used for motorcycle parking only. Committee Member Searle seconded the motion. On a motion by Committee Member Silva, seconded by Committee Member Searle, and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee adopt a Resolution approving exterior alterations and site improvements with added Conditions of Approval as follows: AYES: 5 MEMBERS: Latasa, Freeman, Dawson, Searle, Silva NOES: 1 MEMBERS: Kimzey ABSENT: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None Chair Latasa said he supports the motion because it will improve maneuverability in the parking lot. Committee Member Dawson said understands Kimzey’s concerns, but supports the motion. 8. Consider Adopting New Major and Minor Project List for Architectural Review and Sign Permits ACTION: Adopted a Resolution adopting a Major/Minor List for Architectural Review and Signs. Staff Presentation/Committee Member Questions Elizabeth Caraker presented the Agenda Report and answered Committee Members’ questions. Public Comments None. Committee Member Comments Committee Member Silva said the phrase “complying with ADA Regulations” should be changed to “comply with accessibility regulations.” Committee Member Kimzey said he supports the goal of simplifying the application process, but does not understand the full implications of the proposed changes. Committee Member Silva said staff is attempting to differentiate a fee structure and that all items currently heard before the ARC will continue to be heard. Chair Latasa said he is comfortable with staff’s recommendation to make processes more applicant-friendly, and that he does not see any obvious discrepancies in staff’s proposal. Vice Chair Freeman concurred with Chair Latasa and said staff does well in differentiating applications and bringing them before the ARC. Committee Member Dawson thanked staff for separating the minor and major projects to help reduce the cost burden on applicants. 5  Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, September 17, 2014 Vice Chair Freeman made a motion adopt a Resolution adopting a Major/Minor List for Architectural Review and Signs. Committee Member Silva seconded the motion. Committee Member Kimzey abstained from voting on motion. On a motion by Committee Member Freeman, seconded by Committee Member Silva, and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee Adopted a Resolution adopting a Major/Minor List for Architectural Review and Signs: AYES: 5 MEMBERS: Latasa, Freeman, Dawson, Searle, Silva NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 MEMBERS: Kimzey RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None 9. Consider 900 Lighthouse Avenue; Sign Permit 14-281 for a New Wall Sign within a New Mural; Applicant Randy Walthers for Nob Hill Foods; Owner Saucito Land Co.; C-2-D2 Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA ACTION: Adopted a Resolution approving the new wall sign within a new mural with Conditions of Approval. Staff Presentation/Committee Member Questions Ms. Hopper presented the Agenda Report and answered Committee Members’ questions. Ms. Hopper clarified that the Agenda Report said the proposed mural will face Foam Street, but the correct street is Wave Street. Applicant Dunder Schneider, Western Sign Company, said the sign marries advertising with a mural, and its design will be similar to the preserved murals seen on older buildings. In response to Committee Member Dawson’s question, Mr. Schneider said the mural will be painted directly on the brick wall of the building. Randy Walthers, Nob Hill, said the mural will have a nostalgic feel and improve the appearance of the historic neighborhood. Mr. Walthers also said the mural will deter graffiti, and that the back side of the building will be repainted to cover the current graffiti before the mural goes up. In response to Chair Latasa’s question, Mr. Walthers said landscaping or potted plants are not proposed because they would likely be damaged and difficult to maintain. Public Comments None. Committee Member Comments Committee Member Searle said the mural being applied directly on the bricks will add an artistic element and that the mural will be useful for advertising and wayfinding. Committee Member Silva concurred and said he supports the application and the visual contribution it will make to the community. 6  Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, September 17, 2014 Committee Member Freeman said she supports the project and the size of the letters because they only constitute 10% of the mural and are nicely placed. Committee Member Searle made a motion to adopt a Resolution approving the new wall sign within a new mural with Conditions of Approval. Committee Member Dawson seconded the motion. On a motion by Committee Member Searle, seconded by Committee Member Dawson, and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee Adopted a Resolution approving the new wall sign within a new mural with Conditions of Approval: AYES: 6 MEMBERS: Latasa, Freeman, Dawson, Kimzey, Searle, Silva NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None 10. Consider 647 Oak Street; AR Permit 14-292 for Preliminary and Final Review of a Second Story Addition; Applicant Thomas B. Hood, Architect; Owner Shawn & Melissa Rozsa; R-1-5 Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA Requirements ACTION: Adopted a Resolution approving AR Permit 14-292 for Preliminary and Final Architectural Review of a one and two-story addition to an existing single-family house with added Special Conditions of Approval. Staff Presentation/Committee Member Questions Todd Bennett presented the Agenda Report and answered Committee Members’ questions. Mr. Bennett informed the Committee that revisions have been made by the applicant lowering the roof by 2 feet, 10 inches. Applicant Shawn Rosza, applicant, said he and his wife want to build a home with little view, privacy, and shadow impacts on the neighbors. He also said a story pole installer confirmed that the new story poles are two feet 10 inches lower than the previous poles. Mr. Rosza said the neighbors at 646 Newton Street do not object to the revised project and that they tried to resolve view impacts for the neighbor at 650 Newton with the roof revisions and by moving the back yard shed peak. Melissa Rosza, applicant, said a back yard for her children to play in is very important and moving the house allowed space for a yard. Thomas Hood, Architect, said he did not realize the initial project would cause a loss of ocean and city views for the neighbor at 650 Newton Street, and that he modified the plans to lower the roof slope once the view impacts were discovered. Mr. Hood also said that the revised proposal is five feet below the allowed height for the neighborhood, the New Monterey Neighborhood Association supports the project, and that an acceptable portion of neighboring views have been obtained. Public Comments Theresa Ferrante, resident of 650 Oak Street, she said she appreciates the removal of the shed from the Rosza’s yard, but her main concern is the impact on the views from her two upstairs bedroom windows. She also said that these views still remain substantially decreased after lowering of the story pole staking. Ms. Ferrante said she likes the design 7 Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, September 17, 2014 of the house and appreciates the lowered roof height; however there will still be an impact. Tina Hannas-DeFreitas, friend of Mr. and Ms. Rosza and independent land use consultant, said she examined the project critically and determined that with the revised roof line the view will remain exactly the same as it currently is. Committee Member Comments Committee Member Dawson said that the height of the house at 19 feet is below the maximum allowed height. He also said the roof line impacts Ms. Ferrante’s view, but much less than the previous proposal, and that ultimately the view has been shared by both owners. Committee Member Silva said that he supports the project as revised and that the views from the second floor windows appear to be protected. Committee Member Kimzey complimented the applicants on working with the neighbors and said substantial views have been preserved, and the project will not cause unreasonable impacts. Committee Member Searle said he supports the revised project and that it will be a nice fit for Monterey. Vice Chair Freeman said she agrees with Committee Members’ comments and that the project is a high quality home. Chair Latasa complimented the applicant on their diligence in working the neighbors and said the new design is more attractive than the previous design. Committee Member Silva Made a motion to adopt a Resolution approving AR Permit 14- 292 for Preliminary and Final Architectural Review of a one and two-story addition to an existing single-family house with added Special Conditions of Approval: 4. That a letter from a licensed surveyor be submitted that verifies that the story pole staking is an accurate representation of the proposed height and mass of the approved project. 5. That review authority for the exterior paint colors and light fixtures be delegated to Planning staff, and that these project elements be approved prior to their application on the dwelling. Committee Member Searle seconded the motion. On a motion by Committee Member Silva, seconded by Committee Member Searle, and carried by the following vote, the Architectural Review Committee adopted a Resolution approving AR Permit 14-292 for Preliminary and Final Architectural Review of a one and two-story addition to an existing single-family house with added Special Conditions of Approval: AYES: 6 MEMBERS: Latasa, Freeman, Dawson, Kimzey, Searle, Silva NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None 8  Architectural Review Committee Minutes Wednesday, September 17, 2014 COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS Committee Member Dawson said the Alliance of Monterey Area Preservationists (AMAP) will host an Art Deco bus tour to Salinas with lunch the Steinbeck house on October 25, 2014, and that there are 10 reserved tickets for City of Monterey Commissioner and Committee Members who would like to attend. Mr. Dawson also said he recently met with the North Fremont Business District Association to discuss the upcoming budget year. Vice Chair Freeman complimented the Jules Tavernier Lecture Series with Scott A. Shields, presented by the Old Monterey Business Association, which was held at the Monterey Museum of Art on September 12th, 2014. Committee Member Silva said Councilmember Downey asked for statistics on the number of appeals of ARC projects to the Planning Commission at the September 16, 2014 City Council meeting. Vice Chair Latasa said he will not be in attendance at the October 1, 2014 ARC meeting. Ms. Hopper said the City applied for and received a 6.4 million dollar grant for North Fremont Street and said the Planning and Traffic divisions have brought in over 10 million dollars over the past year. She also said the Planning Office has applied for a grant to revise coastal permits. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS 11. Planning Office Update  Received update  Ms. Hopper said there is a vacant spot on the Architectural Review Committee and encouraged those who may be interest to apply. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:42 pm. Respectfully Submitted, Approved, Christine Hopper Chair Senior Associate Planner Architectural Review Committee 9