Council Regular Meeting

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY OF MONTEREY Tuesday, May 19, 2020 4:00 PM 7:00 PM MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA Councilmembers Present: Albert, Haffa, Smith, Williamson, Roberson Absent: None City Staff City Manager, Assistant City Manager, City Attorney, Community Present: Development Director, Public Works Director, Police Chief, Finance Director, Parks and Recreation Director, Acting City Clerk, Human Resources Director, Dir. of Information Resources/City Clerk, Assistant Director of Information Resources, Associate Planner, Administrative Analyst (Housing), Deputy Human Resources Manager, Fire Chief, Assistant Finance Director, Parking Superintendent, Principal Planner Pursuant to Section 3 of Executive Order N-29-20, issued by Governor Newsom on March 17, 2020, this meeting was conducted with telephonic/video participation only by all parties. ***Afternoon Session Agenda *** CALL TO ORDER Mayor Roberson called the meeting to order at 4:02 p.m. Assistant City Manager Rojanasathira provided information about how to participate by calling in to give public comment on the live web meeting. PRESENTATIONS 1. Recognize National Public Works Week 2020 (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Recognized National Public Works Week 2020 Public Works Director Wittry gave a brief introduction and played a video about the work of the Public Works team during the Shelter in Place order due to the COVID-19 pandemic. He answered Councilmembers' questions. 2. Presentation on Public Banking (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Received presentation Councilmember Williamson introduced the matter and Brett Garrett, People for Public Banking in Santa Cruz, gave an oral presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions. The Council discussed the matter. It was suggested that it might help to pass a resolution of support requesting that the County provide leadership. It was noted that access to low-interest funding would be of interest. It was requested to know more about governance and oversight of public banks, and about the scope of the City's potential involvement. Concern was noted about the potential of jeopardizing the City's bond rating or assets. It was stated that there are a lot of questions and this is the first dialogue in a conversation.  City Council Minutes May 19, 2020 Mayor Roberson opened public comments. Duane Peterson, Villa Del Monte, echoed concerns about the City's assets with regard to public banking, and asked if there would be a risk of being raided by the State. Kevin Dayton expressed support for interest and fees being retained locally, and agreed with the concept that local bankers should have the opportunity to weigh in. He expressed concern about special interests and favoritism, but concluded that public banking is worth pursuing. James McIntosh referred to Wells Fargo's actions in the past and said that they may not serve the advantage of the community, and spoke in favor of the City's rental assistance program. With no further requests to speak, Mayor Roberson closed public comments. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mayor Roberson opened public comments. Curt Tipton, Downtown Neighborhood Association, referring to Item 9, requested that City staff look for grants to make the Pearl District a historic district instead of designating each property individually. With no further requests to speak, Mayor Roberson closed public comments. CONSENT ITEMS City Manager Uslar, Public Works Director Wittry, and Parking Superintendent Steffy answered Councilmembers' questions on Items 5, 6, 7, and 8. On a motion by Mayor Roberson, seconded by Councilmember Smith, and carried by the following vote, which was conducted by roll call, the City Council approved the CONSENT ITEMS except Item 6: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Albert, Haffa, Smith, Williamson, Roberson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) Approval of Minutes 3. April 29, 2020 (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Adopted 4. May 5, 2020 (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Adopted Ordinances 5. Introduce, Read by Title Only, and Pass a First Reading of an Ordinance Repealing Monterey City Code 33-29 Park and Recreation Dedication and Fees Action: Passed Ordinance to print Resolutions 6. Amend Resolution 15-215 to Revise the Master Fee Schedule to Adjust Parking Division Rates and Fees (Not a Project Under CEQA, Per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) 2  City Council Minutes May 19, 2020 Action: Pulled from Consent; Adopted Resolution No. 20-060 C.S. as amended to keep Monterey Sports Center (MSC) parking fees as they currently stand, and Directed staff to bring MSC parking fees to Council at a later date Mayor Roberson opened public comments. Curt Tipton referred to the downtown overlay, commenting that downtown garages will be used at night, which he said may not allow residents to use the structure without undue burden. Duane Peterson asked if the increases can be applied gradually in smaller increments, or suggested that if the full increase is put in place at once, there be a longer time period for parking. Kevin Dayton, Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce, echoed a Councilmember suggestion to better share information about local parking deals. DeAnn Brady recommended that the Council increase the flat rate in the Cannery Row garage during peak season and keep employee vouchers the same. She asked Council to wait until January 2021 to implement the fee increases. With no further requests to speak, Mayor Roberson closed public comments. The Council discussed the matter. Regarding the idea of waiting until January to implement the increases, it was stated that instead perhaps staff could come back to Council in January with a report on the impact of increasing the fees. On a motion by Mayor Roberson, seconded by Councilmember Haffa, and carried by the following vote, which was conducted by roll call, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 20- 060 C.S. as amended to keep Monterey Sports Center (MSC) parking fees as they currently stand, and directed staff to bring MSC parking fees to Council at a later date: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Albert, Haffa, Smith, Williamson, Roberson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) 7. Amend Resolution 19-115 Changing the Position Control List for the Information Services Department by Reclassifying the Senior Assistant City Clerk Position to City Clerk ; and Amend Resolution 17-150 Changing the Salary Schedule to Add the Full-time Salary Schedule for the City Clerk (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Adopted Resolution No. 20-061 C.S. Other 8. Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: 330-350 Alvarado Street (Osio Plaza); Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties: Patrick Prindle (MCM Diversified as agent for Green Valley Corporation); Under Negotiation: Terms and Conditions for Lease Termination (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Appointed Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete as agency negotiators *** End of Consent Agenda *** PUBLIC HEARING 9. 1st Reading - Rezone 490 Camino El Estero as a City Historic Resource from PC-D-ES to PC- D-ES-H-2 (Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15305, Class 5) 3  City Council Minutes May 19, 2020 Action: Passed Ordinance to print Senior Associate Planner Roveri gave the staff presentation. Mayor Roberson opened public comments. Pastor Ted Esaki spoke in support of the historic rezone. With no further requests to speak, Mayor Roberson closed public comments. On a motion by Councilmember Albert, seconded by Councilmember Smith, and carried by the following vote, which was conducted by roll call, the City Council passed the ordinance to Rezone 490 Camino El Estero as a City Historic Resource from PC-D-ES to PC-D-ES-H-2: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Albert, Haffa, Smith, Williamson, Roberson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) 10. Adopt a Substantial Amendment to the 2019/2020 Annual Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant Funds and the Citizen Participation Plan, and Authorize Submittal to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to Receive $152,845 in CARES Act Funding for Emergency Housing Assistance (Exempt from NEPA per 24 CFR Part 58 and from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15301, Class1, 15306, Class 6 and 15326, Class 26). Action: Adopted Resolution No. 20-062 C.S. Housing Analyst Leonard gave a brief staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions. Mayor Roberson opened public comments. James McIntosh expressed concern about whether people who have lost their jobs due to COVID-19 will be covered by the program. With no further requests to speak, Mayor Roberson closed public comments. Council discussed the matter. It was stated that this program would be important for the renter community, which accounts for a high percentage of Monterey residents. On question, City Manager Uslar confirmed that the program applies to people who live and/or work in Monterey. On a motion by Councilmember Williamson, seconded by Councilmember Haffa, and carried by the following vote, which was conducted by roll call, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 20- to adopt a Substantial Amendment to the 2019/2020 Annual Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant Funds and the Citizen Participation Plan.: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Albert, Haffa, Smith, Williamson, Roberson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) PUBLIC APPEARANCE 4  City Council Minutes May 19, 2020 11. Authorize the Mayor to Send Letters to Monterey One Water, Monterey Peninsula Unified School District, Monterey Peninsula Water District, and Transportation Agency for Monterey County on behalf of the City Requesting these Agencies Consider Revising Fee Schedules for Residential Development to a Square Footage Basis and to Collect Fees at Certificate of Occupancy (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Tabled This item was continued by Mayor Roberson to be heard as the last item in the evening session and was at that time tabled by Mayor Roberson. RECESS 5:30 p.m. Council recessed at 5:35 p.m. RECONVENE The Council reconvened at 7:03 p.m. *** Evening Session Agenda *** PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Roberson led the Pledge. CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS Mayor Roberson opened public comments. Esther Malkin said that the housing assistance program needs to be creative to help renters, including those who may not be party to a formal lease. Lorna Moffat expressed appreciation for improvements at the sidewalk at Figueroa Street, and expressed concern about lack of social distancing on the wharf and about dangerous additives in a future COVID-19 vaccine. Curt Tipton referred to concerns about sea level rise and stated that the proposed overlay (Item 12) is projected to be under water in the future. Wendy Brickman thanked the City for its responsiveness to the COVID-19 crisis. Katrina Hintze thanked the City for recent repairs on the Recreational Trail, and asked for considerations for those with disabilities regarding access to the Rec Trail and the beaches. With no further requests to speak, Mayor Roberson closed public comments. City Manager Uslar said that City staff is looking into the question about rental assistance for those who are renting a room without being party to a formal lease. PUBLIC HEARING (EVE) 12. Amend Resolution 19-211 to Include 650 East Franklin Street and 437 Figueroa Street In, and Remove 450 Camino El Estero from, the Boundaries of the Density Cap Overlay District in the Downtown Specific Plan; Exempt from CEQA per Government Code Section 65457 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 Action: Adopted Resolution No. 20-063 C.S. Principal Planner Flower gave the staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions. 5  City Council Minutes May 19, 2020 Mayor Roberson opened public comments. Lorna Moffat said that the area is not appropriate for four story buildings. Mallory Mickel expressed concern about four story buildings in the area and said it would be an eyesore with associated traffic and parking concerns. Barbara Meister, Monterey Bay Aquarium, spoke in support of the staff recommendation. With no further requests to speak, Mayor Roberson closed public comments. The Council discussed the matter. It was suggested to include the Mission Mortuary location (450 Camino El Estero) with the sites proposed in the resolution. A motion was introduced by Councilmember Williamson to approve the staff recommendation as amended to include 450 Camino El Estero site. The motion died for lack of a second. It was noted by Council that the City needs to meet current and pent-up housing needs. Regarding height, it was stated that the increased height is needed for density and won't stand out in the area, and that Council desires height modulation and significantly designed buildings in the area. Regarding density, it was noted that this action does not increase the number of units in the area by a huge number, and it was stated that downtown is an appropriate area for housing density and that other areas in the City need to do their part toward the housing crisis as well. It was stated that both proposed properties make sense to add, that the area is in need of attention and redevelopment, and that mixed use development in the area will benefit everyone and increase property values. It was stated that the entire area has historic value and may make sense to acknowledge as a historic district. On a motion by Councilmember Albert, seconded by Councilmember Smith, and carried by the following vote, which was conducted by roll call, the City Council staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 20-063 C.S. to Amend the Downtown Specific Plan to Include 650 East Franklin Street and 437 Figueroa Street in, and remove 450 Camino El Estero from, the Boundaries for the Density Cap Overlay District in the Downtown Specific Plan: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Albert, Haffa, Smith, Williamson, Roberson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) 13. Deny Appeal 20-083 and Approve the Personal Wireless Facility Use Permit UP-20-0039, to Allow a New Verizon Wireless Facility at the Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula Building located at 23265 Holman Highway; Applicant: Ben Hackstedde Sequoia Deployment Services for Verizon Wireless; Owner: Montage Health; PC – Planned Community Zoning District; Commercial General Plan Land Use Designation; Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15303, Class 3 Action: Adopted Resolution No. 20-064 C.S. Mayor Roberson explained the procedural process for a fair hearing. He asked the Council if any member had any ex parte communications, and if so, to please disclose those communications. None were disclosed. Jerry Hittleman, contract planner with Rincon Consultants, gave the staff presentation. He explained the project location and history, and said that staff acknowledges the reasons for the appellant’s appeal, but said that The proposed project complies with all local (Monterey Municipal Code), state (CEQA) and FCC radiofrequency regulations. He went through the points that were the basis for the appeal and addressed them, and explained the findings 6 City Council Minutes May 19, 2020 recommended by staff and the recommendation to deny the appeal and approve the use permit. He answered Councilmembers' questions. Applicant Paul Albritton, Verizon Wireless, on the phone with seven colleagues, spoke on behalf of the project application and the importance to the hospital of obtaining improved access to the Verizon network. He said that the appellant’s principal position relates to RF exposure, but environmental concerns were raised as well. He addressed the appellant’s environmental and property value concerns, noting that Federal law states that once the applicant has shown that the facility complies with FCC guidelines, there can be no environmental regulation on the effects of radiofrequency emissions. He said that electromagnetic sensitivity is not a protected disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). He said that the appellant is mistaken on the law with regard to ADA, the Fair Housing Act, and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). He indicated that the medical professionals are currently unable to communicate with their “click system” using Verizon coverage and noted that wireless services can serve as backup when broadband services fail. Duane Bonham, RF engineer for Verizon Wireless, described the small coverage (one quarter to one half mile in any direction) designed to be reached by the site, and said that the request for coverage came from the hospital. Bill Hammett, P.E., Hammett & Edison Consulting Engineers, said that the maximum RF exposure associated with the proposed facility was well below the federal allowed amount. He said that the circle diagram by CTC showed the exposure at the height of the antenna, not at ground level or inside the building. He said that the exposure inside the building will be less than ground level outside the building. On question from Council, Mr. Hammett said that RF exposure produced by the three carriers at the site is experienced cumulatively, and confirmed that the cumulative total is still substantially below the FCC limit. Appellant Nina Beety stressed the points that make up the basis of her appeal and stated that she stands by their accuracy. She went through statements made by Mr. Albritton in his letter and rejected his statements, saying that ADA and NEPA are not proxy arguments and must be complied with by the City. She stated that the Telecommunications Act (TCA) requires enforcement of other laws, and alleged that Mr. Albritton was cherry-picking the TCA. She stated that Mr. Albritton’s claim about electromagnetic sensitivity (EMS) not being protected by the ADA goes against federal acknowledgement of EMS persons, and said that there must be balancing of vulnerable humans with machine environments. She said that Mr. Albritton’s statement about WHO should be disregarded and that there are thousands of studies that link EMS symptoms to EMF exposure. Regarding the report by Mr. Hittleman on behalf of the City, she said that the recommendation to deny the appeal represents a breakdown in community relations. She called into question Mr. Hittleman’s qualifications on ADA and FHA topics. She stated that the significant change posed by the project should trigger NEPA review as measured by peak decibels at her home, and stated that the City can invoke FCC statutes and require NEPA review due to significant alteration of her home environment. She said that earlier materials indicated a larger area of RF exposure than the area stated by the applicant at this time. She said that this project does not comply with the City’s wireless ordinance due to noncompliance with ADA. She said that if the Council denies the appeal, it is her request that Verizon not activate its facility in a phased manner, and asked for notification when it will be activated to be given to the City and from the City to her. City Attorney Davi stated that the Council could ask questions of Ms. Beety, and no questions were asked. Mayor Roberson opened public comments. Tim Nylen, Montage Health, said that the wireless facility is needed to increase connectivty at the hospital and that the decision to add the tower is not a business decision but a decision to support the medical community. Lorna Moffat, citing health concerns relating to cellular technology, asked City Council to postpone the project and read the book Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards of the Wireless Age by George Carlo. 7  City Council Minutes May 19, 2020 Susan Foster referred to a 2004 study of six firefighters who she said were found to have measurable brain damage due to five years of exposure to a tower in front of their station that she said emitted frequencies measured at 1/1000th of the amount allowable by the FCC, at 2G levels. She said that Ms. Beety has every right to request ADA accommodations and asserted that the ADA is not preempted by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Kevin Dayton said that it is notable that the medical professionals have requested the coverage. With no further requests to speak, Mayor Roberson closed public comments. Mr. Albritton, Applicant, said in rebuttal to the appellant that Verizon Wireless is always in compliance with RF regulations set by the FCC. He said that the courts have never been acknowledged EMS as a disability requiring accommodations under the ADA. He said that Verizon Wireless complies with all NEPA requirements and that this project does not qualify for NEPA review. Mr. Hammett said that the 10% referred to by Mr. Hittleman is based on figures provided by a City-obtained report and that the 3% is on the conservative end of the calculation. He said that his April 1 letter addressed Ms. Beety’s concerns. He said that at a half mile away, at Ms. Beety’s home, exposure would be at a thousandths-of-a-percent level. Council recessed at 9:14 p.m. and reconvened at 9:30 p.m. A motion was introduced by Councilmember Smith, and seconded by Councilmember Haffa, to accept the staff recommendation and find that the Planning Commission's vote should be upheld to Deny Appeal 20-083 and Approve the Personal Wireless Facility Use Permit UP-20- 0039. It was stated by Council that the points of the appeal were studied carefully and that the Planning Commission's questions and decisions were thorough and made the right findings. It was stated that the Councilmembers could not find anything that the Planning Commission erred on to suggest a need to overturn their decision. It was stated that the Council appreciates the concerns of the appellant but there is nothing that would justify a denial, such as no aesthetic impacts or historic status of a building, and even though Council can't consider RF exposure, it is found that the RF exposure at the ground is less than 10% of what is allowed by FCC, and in the building the exposure is even less. It was stated that this site is a priority site since it is not a residential area, so the applicant is actually trying to do what Council is asking them to do and is well within the FCC standards. The motion carried by the following roll-call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Albert, Haffa, Smith, Williamson, Roberson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) PUBLIC APPEARANCE (EVE) 14. City Manager Report on Covid-19 Response Efforts (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061) Action: Received report City Manager Uslar gave the presentation. On question, he said that there are inquiries considering closing streets to allow pedestrian traffic and outdoor seating, and that the business 8  City Council Minutes May 19, 2020 community has not spoken yet with one voice on this matter. A Councilmember requested that business people who are hesitant try to become open to the idea. Mayor Roberson opened public comments. Esther Malkin said she has concerns about the lack of enforcement of current policies such as requiring masks and social distancing. She said that that it is important not to undo the progress the area has made to keep COVID-19 numbers low. With no further requests to speak, Mayor Roberson closed public comments. 15. Adopt a Resolution Ratifying the Order of the Director of Emergency Services (Monterey City Manager) Directing Limited Beach and Park Closures to Prevent the Spread of COVID-19, Amended May 8, 2020 (Exempt from CEQA Per Article 18, Section 15269.c) Action: Adopted Resolution No. 20-065 C.S. Assistant City Manager Rojanasathira gave the staff presentation. He and City Manager Uslar answered Councilmembers' questions. Mayor Roberson opened public comments. Lorna Moffat asked how the City would enforce the regulations, and said that people need to wear masks on the beach. Thomas cited a KION report that Monterey Police are not enforcing COVID-19 regulations. Esther Malkin said that it is unfair to place the burden for the lack of enforcement on the front-line staff; she said that education is not a substitute for enforcement, it is an invitation for more disobedience. Leslie Svetich said that asking police officers to enforce the regulations would put them in in harm's way. With no further requests to speak, Mayor Roberson closed public comments. The Council discussed the matter. It was stated that the City team is handling the situation well. The Council addressed the police officers and thanked them for the work they are doing. It was stated that public health and safety and personal liberty are both valid, serious concerns, and that the Council and staff are trying to find the balance. It was emphasized that we have a responsibility to each other to observe social distancing and wear masks in public. On a motion by Councilmember Smith, seconded by Councilmember Albert, and carried by the following vote, which was conducted by roll call, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 20- 065 C.S. Ratifying the Order of the Director of Emergency Services (Monterey City Manager) Directing Limited Beach and Park Closures to Prevent the Spread of COVID-19, Amended May 8, 2020: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Albert, Haffa, Smith, Williamson, Roberson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None) COUNCIL COMMENTS Council comments were not heard, in the interest of time. CITY MANAGER REPORTS City Manager reports were not heard, in the interest of time. Mayor Roberson opened public comments on the closed session, and received none. ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CLOSED SESSION 9  City Council Minutes May 19, 2020 cs1. Closed Session Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: 330-350 Alvarado Street (Osio Plaza) Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete Negotiating Parties: Patrick Prindle (MCM Diversified, as agent for Green Valley Corporation) Under Negotiation: Terms and Conditions for Lease Termination (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Not heard cs2. Conference with Labor Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency Negotiators: Allyson Hauck and Gina Russo; General Employees of Monterey (GEM), Management Employees' Association (MEA), Police Lieutenants' Management Association (PLMA), Monterey Fire Chief Officers' Association (MFCOA), Monterey Police Association (MPA), Monterey Fire Fighters' Association (MFFA) Monterey Executive Management Employees' Association (MEMEA) (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: On a unanimous roll call vote, the Council gave confidential direction to their labor negotiators cs3. BECERRA MARQUEZ, PEDRO vs. CITY OF MONTEREY, et al. WCAB No.: ADJ11340948: Fwd: Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1) Name of Case: BECERRA MARQUEZ, PEDRO vs. City of Monterey (Workers' Compensation Appeals Board) (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: On a unanimous roll call vote, the Council gave confidential direction to their legal counsel ADJOURNMENT The Council adjourned at 11:27 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Approved, Clementine Bonner Klein Clyde Roberson Acting City Clerk Mayor 10