Historic Preservation Commission Meeting
Regular MeetingMonterey, CA · October 10, 2019
Minutes
DocuSign Envelope ID: D3BB3859-5445-4141-98BD-E8EBACA38B3B
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Thursday, October 10, 2019
4:00 PM – 6:00 PM
580 PACIFIC STREET, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
Members Present: Dawson, Napoli, Barlow, Collum, O’Brien, O’Neil
Members Absent: Smith-Crivello
Staff Members Present: Housing and Community Development Manager Caraker,
Associate Planner Sabdo, Administrative Assistant Salameh
1. Meeting Procedures
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Dawson called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.
CONSENT ITEMS
Approval of Minutes
2. September 12, 2019
Action: Approved as amended.
On a motion by Commissioner Barlow, seconded by Commissioner O’Brien, and carried
by the following vote, the Historic Preservation Commission approved the September 12,
2019 minutes as amended.
AYES: 6 MEMBERS: Dawson, Napoli, Barlow, Collum, O’Brien, O’Neil
NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 MEMBERS: Smith-Crivello
ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None
RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
PUBLIC APPEARANCE
3. Approve 1281 5th Street; HP-19-0291 to Remove a Property from the Oak Grove
Neighborhood Reconnaissance Survey List; Applicant and Owner Debbie Young;
R-3-6 Zoning District; Medium Family Residential General Plan Designation;
Exempt from CEQA Requirements per Article 19, Section 15331, Class 31
Action: Approved 1281 5th Street; HP-19-0291 to Remove a Property from the Oak
Grove Neighborhood Reconnaissance Survey List
Staff Presentation/Committee Member Questions
DocuSign Envelope ID: D3BB3859-5445-4141-98BD-E8EBACA38B3B
Associate Planner Sabdo presented the Agenda Report and took Commissioners’ questions.
Commissioner Barlow asked when the Oak Grove reconnaissance survey was conducted and
Ms. Caraker replied that it was conducted in 2007.
Public Comments
Don Prescott said that he owned a property near the subject site and that he supported the
applicant’s proposal and staff recommendation, noting that he felt that not all properties that
were listed as potentially historic actually qualified.
Applicant
Debbie Young said that she had noticed the property several years ago, due to its poor
upkeep. She said that she would like it removed from the reconnaissance survey list because
extensive modifications were necessary to update and rehabilitate the property. She spoke of
planned improvements and said that once complete, the home would be an asset to the
neighborhood.
Chair Dawson asked how much of the home Ms. Young planned to preserve and if it would
look like the original structure. Ms. Young said that she did not plan to demolish the structure,
but that plans had not yet been created. She explained that her husband was a general
contractor and that they planned to improve and enhance the home, and that they would like
to leave the front of the home as is.
Commissioner Barlow asked Ms. Young if staff had informed her of the Mills Act program and
Ms. Young said yes, but after researching the program she felt it would not be feasible with
the amount of repairs to be made. She also noted that the expense of rehabilitating the
house to historic standards was not something that they had budgeted for.
Mr. Bergstein said that, as a consultant hired to analyze the subject, he felt that this was not
an eligible property because not much of the original home remained and changes had
occurred haphazardly over time.
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner O’Neil said that she felt the field trip had been very valuable, as the photos
included in the agenda report did not do justice to the condition of the property. She said that
she did not see much historical integrity in the subject site and that she supported the
applicants’ request to remove it from the reconnaissance survey.
On a motion by Commissioner O’Neil, seconded by Commissioner Collum, and carried
by the following vote, the Historic Preservation Commission approved 1281 5th Street;
HP-19-0291 to Remove a Property from the Oak Grove Neighborhood Reconnaissance
Survey List
AYES: 6 MEMBERS: Dawson, Napoli, Barlow, Collum, O’Brien, O’Neil
NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 MEMBERS: Smith-Crivello
ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None
RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None
4. Approve 554 Van Buren Street; Historic Permit HP-19-0263 to Allow Landscape
Alterations; Applicant and Property Owner: Kenneth Williston; R-3-6-H2 Zoning
Designation; Medium Family Residential General Plan Designation; Exempt from
CEQA Requirements per Section 15301, Class 1, Section 15303, Class 3, and
15331, Class 31
2
DocuSign Envelope ID: D3BB3859-5445-4141-98BD-E8EBACA38B3B
Action: Approved 554 Van Buren Street; Historic Permit HP-19-0263 to allow
landscape alterations with staff-recommended conditions of approval and direction to
the applicant to submit a letter from an architectural historian that evaluates the front
stairs and walkway for consistency with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards.
Staff Presentation
Associate Planner Sabdo presented the Agenda Report and took Commissioners’ questions.
Commissioners asked questions regarding landscape and hardscape, the logistics of
narrowing the front walkway, and for what portion of the proposed project staff did not
recommend approval, to which staff replied.
Public Comments
None.
Applicant
Karen Williston thanked staff for their help with the project. She said that the front steps were
not to code and that the risers and treads were uneven. She added that their material,
cement, was not historic in her opinion and that she would like permission to rebuild the steps
to the proper dimensions. She said that her goal was not only to make the steps safe, but
also attractive.
Commissioner Comments
Chair Dawson noted that without an intensive survey, the timeframe of the steps’ installation
was uncertain.
Vice Chair Napoli noted that the steps appeared to have been built later and that they did
detract from the house.
Chair Dawson said that it was possible the steps had been widened at one point, as the
subject site had once been a duplex.
Commissioner Barlow said that he did not have an issue with requiring a historic report solely
for the front steps, but that he was not comfortable with alterations occurring to the front of the
building if the stairs were to be removed and replaced.
Chair Dawson said that she would like to see plans that illustrated how the walkway and stairs
would be narrowed.
Commissioner O’Neil said that without a historic report, the HPC did not have complete
information to make a determination.
Commissioner O’Brien noted that the original steps were most likely wood.
Vice Chair Napoli agreed that the original steps were most likely wood and noted that a five-
foot walkway would be an appropriate size for a historical structure. He said that it appeared
the applicant had done research on their own and that they seemed to want to improve the
historic resource rather than altering it.
Chair Dawson suggested separating the motion into two parts; one for the landscape and one
for the stairs.
Ms. Sabdo asked HPC to consider staff’s recommended special conditions of approval in their
motion.
3
DocuSign Envelope ID: D3BB3859-5445-4141-98BD-E8EBACA38B3B
Commissioner Collum made a motion to approve the walkway, wall, gate and wrought iron
and Commissioner O’Neil seconded the motion.
Ms. Caraker noted that if the HPC would like to consider anything further, a new resolution
would need to be drafted and brought back to the HPC.
Chair Dawson noted that they did not know the best way to narrow the stairs, as no relevant
plans had been presented.
Commissioner Barlow agreed, adding that aside from an intensive survey on the steps,
information had been provided on all other aspects of the project.
Commissioners O’Neil and O’Brien said that they would like to see a historic report on the
front steps.
Commissioner Barlow noted that a historic report focused solely on the stairs should
considerably reduce the cost.
Ms. Caraker noted that a historic report is required by the historic ordinance.
Commissioner O’Neil said that it was a lovely house and Commissioner Barlow thanked the
applicant for working through the historic process.
On a motion by Commissioner Collum, seconded by Commissioner O’Neil, and carried
by the following vote, the Historic Preservation Commission approved 554 Van Buren
Street; Historic Permit HP-19-0263 to allow landscape alterations with staff-
recommended conditions of approval and direction to the applicant to submit a letter from
an architectural historian that evaluates the front stairs and walkway for consistency with
the Secretary of Interior’s Standards.
AYES: 6 MEMBERS: Dawson, Napoli, Barlow, Collum, O’Brien, O’Neil
NOES: 0 MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 MEMBERS: Smith-Crivello
ABSTAIN: 0 MEMBERS: None
RECUSED: 0 MEMBERS: None
4
DocuSign Envelope ID: D3BB3859-5445-4141-98BD-E8EBACA38B3B
COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS
Commissioners Collum and O’Neil spoke about upcoming events.
Chair Dawson asked for an update on the historic ordinance and Ms. Caraker said that it would
be presented for review in the near future.
Chair Dawson asked that Commissioners wishing to attend meetings via teleconference please
let staff know at least a week prior to the meeting.
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
5. Planning Office Update
Update received.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 4:42 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Elizabeth Caraker, AICP Chair
Housing & Community Development Manager Historic Preservation Commission
5
Agenda
Historic Preservation Commission Commissioners
Agenda Carole Dawson, Chair
Michael Napoli, Vice Chair
REGULAR MEETING Christopher Barlow
Cathy Collum
Thursday, October 10, 2019 Jean O’Brien
Carol O’Neil
4:00 PM Jerilynn Smith-Crivello
Council Chambers
580 Pacific Street
Monterey, California
FIELD TRIP
The Historic Preservation Commission will conduct a field trip on Monday, October 7,
2019 to review the Thursday, October 10, 2019 HPC meeting agenda. The field trip will
depart from the lawn behind Colton Hall at 4:00 p.m. For more information, call (831)
646-3885. Date Posted: October 4, 2019
CALL TO ORDER
1. Meeting Procedures
CONSENT ITEMS
CONSENT ITEMS allow for a review of those items recommended for approval on
consent or recommended to be continued, tabled or withdrawn, etc. Consent items
consist of those items which are routine and for which a staff recommendation has been
prepared. A member of the public or a Commissioner may request that an item
recommended for approval on consent be heard on the regular agenda for further
discussion.
Approval of Minutes
2. September 12, 2019
***End of Consent Agenda***
PUBLIC COMMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS. At this time, the public may speak for a maximum of three minutes
on any subject which is within the jurisdiction of the Monterey Historic Preservation
Commission and which is not on the agenda. Any person or group desiring to bring an
item to the attention of the Commission may do so during Public Comments or by
addressing a letter of explanation to the Commission, City Hall, Monterey, CA 93940.
Public Comments are taken during the afternoon session and continued at the evening
session. Individuals may choose to speak once for up to three minutes at either session,
but not both.
PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC HEARINGS are required by law for certain actions. You are welcome to offer
your comments after being recognized by the Chair. The Chair may limit the time
allocated to each speaker. Project representation is encouraged.
3. Approve 1281 5th Street; HP-19-0291 to Remove a Property from the Oak
Grove Neighborhood Reconnaissance Survey List; Applicant and Owner
Debbie Young; R-3-6 Zoning District; Medium Family Residential General Plan
Designation; Exempt from CEQA Requirements per Article 19, Section 15331,
Class 31
4. Approve 554 Van Buren Street; Historic Permit HP-19-0263 to Allow
Landscape Alterations; Applicant and Property Owner: Kenneth Williston; R-
3-6-H2 Zoning Designation; Medium Family Residential General Plan
Designation; Exempt from CEQA Requirements per Section 15301, Class 1,
Section 15303, Class 3, and 15331, Class 31
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
COMMISSIONERS may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or
make a brief report on his or her activities. In addition, a Commissioner may provide a
referral to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back to
the body at a subsequent meeting concerning any City matter, or direct staff to place a
request to agendize a matter of business on a future agenda. (G.C. 54954.2)
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS supply information on activities or
announcements and may request clarification or direction regarding the scheduling of
meetings and study sessions.
5. Planning Office Update
ADJOURNMENT
ADJOURNMENT— The general policy of the Historic Preservation Commission is that the Afternoon
Session will end no later than 6:30 p.m. Any public agenda items that have not been completed within
the designated adjournment time may be formally extended by the Commission, or continued to the
next regularly scheduled Historic Preservation Commission Meeting, or continued to a Special Meeting.
Agenda packets may be reviewed by the public in the Monterey Public Library, in the Planning Office,
or on the web at http://www.monterey.org/ beginning late Friday afternoon prior to the date of the
meeting.
Members of the public have the right to address the Commission on any Agenda items. The Chair will
formally open the floor for public comment. However, if you wish to speak to items during "Consent
Agenda" or "Staff Informational Report," please advise the staff or the Chair prior to the action on that
item and you will be recognized. Notification as much in advance as possible is appreciated.
Information distributed to the Commission at the meeting becomes part of the public record. A copy of
written material, pictures, etc. should be provided to the Secretary for this purpose.
Historic Preservation Commission decisions may be appealed within ten (10) days from the date of the
decision on forms available in the Planning Division during business hours. When the tenth day falls
on a weekend or a holiday, the appeal deadline date is the next working day following the holiday or
weekend. For more agenda information, call the Planning Office at (831) 646-3885.
CITY OF MONTEREY'S 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES:
Voicemail: (831) 646-3799
FAX: (831) 646-3793
Email: suggest@monterey.org
WebPage: http://www.monterey.org
The City of Monterey is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs
and activities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special
assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (831) 646-
Historic Preservation Commission
10/10/2019 4:00:00 PM
2
3935. Notification 30 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title
II]. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible. For communication-related
assistance, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS
offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7
days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use
CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device.
MORE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE BY CALLING 646-3885
Historic Preservation Commission
10/10/2019 4:00:00 PM
3
Get email alerts for Monterey
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.