Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority
Regular MeetingMonterey, CA · September 27, 2012
Minutes
MINUTES
MONTEREY PENINSULA REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY (MPRWA)
Regular Meeting
6:00 PM, Thursday, September 27, 2012
FEW MEMORIAL HALL
580 PACIFIC STREET
MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
Directors Present: Bachofner, Burnett, Edelen, Pendergrass, Della Sala
Directors Absent: Director Garcia
Staff Present: Monterey City Manager, Clerk of the Authority
ROLL CALL
President Della Sala called the meeting to order at 6:06 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
OTHER BUSINESS
1. Accept Monterey County As Participatory Member of the Monterey Peninsula Regional Water
Authority And Authorize Amendment to Bylaws
Legal Council Davi presented the report. On August 1, 2012 the Board sent a letter to The
County of Monterey inviting participation in the MPRWA. The County voted on September 11,
2012 unannimously to join the MPRWA and appointed Supervisor Dave Potter
as their representative. In addition, they approved a payment of $83,300 for Fiscal Year
12/13. The board would have the discretion to request a pro ration cost for the County to join,
determined $5,561.611. Staff answered questions from the board.
President Della Sala opened the item to public comments. Having no requests to speak
President Della Sala closed public comment.
On a motion by Director Burnett, seconded by Vice President Bachofner, and carried by the
following vote, the Monterey Penninsula Regional Water Authority Accepted The County of
Monterey As A Participatory Member of the Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority
Authorizing an Amendment to the Bylaws, and accepting the $83,300 cost share for FY 12/13
and waiving the pro-rated cost sharing amount of $5k.
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Bachofner, Burnett, Edelen, Pendergrass, Della
Sala
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 1 DIRECTORS: Garcia
ABSTAIN: 0 DIRECTORS: None
RECUSED: 0 DIRECTORS: None
MPRWA Minutes Thursday, September 27, 2012
REPORTS FROM BOARD DIRECTORS AND STAFF
President Della Sala opened the item for reports from the Board.
President Burnett reported that the Monterey Penninsula Water Management
District addressed the topic of gonvernance simlar to the discussion at the last MPRWA
meeting, but differed on the condition the MPWMD proactivly be a public owner. The result will
be submission of seperate organizational letters to the CPUC. The Monterey County Board of
Supervisors will have a special meeting on September 28th, 2012 to review the same question
of governance.
Director Pendergrass reported that the MRWPCA voted on the budget for growndwater
replenishment. The weighted vote results was 11 to 9 against that budget. Groundwater
replenishment is being fought by the valley.
Director Burnett requested a breakdown of the jurisdictions voting against the motion to be able
discuss the dissention. Director Pendergrass indicated those dissenting were the Cities of
Salinas, Marina Coast, Pacific Grove and The Moss Landing Harbor District. Monterey County
abstained from the vote.
Director Garcia arrived at the meeting at 6:26 p.m. expressing regret for being late and stated
for the record that she supports the joining of Monterey County to the MPRWA.
Vice President Bachofner clairfied the resulting impacts of the vote and stressed that timing
was the issue.
Director Burnett said his previous meetings with local Agricultural Representatives to
understand water rights concerns were amiable conversations. Next week there will be another
negotiating session with the farmers.
Supervisor Potter arrived and was welcomed by the board at 6:27 p.m.
2. Receive Report from Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
TAC Chair Stoldt gave an update about the September 18, 2012 TAC Meeting. Item on the
agenda included a presentation and discussion from Consultant Chris Helm regarding
environmetnal and permitting issues and a response to his preliminary look at the three
targeted desalination proposals. Mr. Helm's scope has been adjusted to reflect compliance
activities.
Stoldt indicated that two reports have been recieved to date. Responses were slower than
anticipated and a final report should be available on or before October 31, 2012. Lastly, one
invoice for consulting services has been recieved to date and forwarded on to the finance
officer for payment.
Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority
Regular Meeting Minutes - Thursday, September 27, 2012
2
MPRWA Minutes Thursday, September 27, 2012
a. Summary of September 17, 2012 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
b. Review of Consultant Schedule and Progress
PUBLIC COMMENTS
President Della Sala opened public comment for items not on the agenda.
George Riley speaking as a citizen, concerned about the scheduel the CPUC is on. There has
been a fair amount of effort related to governance. Huge discussion of meeting deadline. FAIR
amount of discussion regarding cost. Concern, the longer you wait to discuss, the longer it will
take to have clear understanding of the paramaters. Concern of public financing. Proving
advantage public financing is less expensive than cal am. 2) too much lip service, not enough
discussion of the opportunites going forward. Expressed concern that there has been very
little discussion on paramaters, opportunties of the costs of the projects,
funding available and how to approach cost of public financing. Requested to agendize a
discussion of costs. Competition breeds lower costs.
Tom Rowley - representing MP Taxpayer association. Attending meetings that discussed many
issues, but the cart before the horse. Spoke to Mr. Rileys concerns about "stranded Costs".
Who is going to pay for stranded costs? They will wind up with the ratepayers. This board
needs to be present when other organizations make decisions that change the costs to the
residents. Looking for more leadership from the board, when it is time appropriate.
TAC Stoldt reminded there is CPUC workshop is on Dec 11,12 & 13 on Costs and Cost
Impacts.
Nelson Vega spoke to Mr. Rileys comments. He disagress that money should not be spent until
a project is decided on. Public financing is not needed if it's not a public source. True
competition is based only on costs and the scope requested would be much larger.
Pigeonholed into a smaller project than is needed.
Having no further comments to speak on Item #2, President Della Sala closed public comment.
Director Burnett commented after public comments that if we have time, we may want to take
on that issue in advance so we can work out our position and be prepared with a fully fleshed
out proposal by December 11th.
President Della Sala opened public commets -THEREALL PUBLIC COMMENTS
Nelson vega : the tax on the parcel, not on how much water was used. commented on votes
that were cast to put something on the ballot in regard to the tax on the bill. Why are duplicating
process and creating buracracys that are not necessary. Here to day that we should not have
Mr. Stoldt on the tac because he cannot serve two masters and it will be a conflict of
interest. He had a no confidence vote a while ago and
President Della Sala is serving at the pleasure of the Board and is donating his time to this
process. There may be a time that ther eis a vote to disband this organization, which was
formed to speak with one voice and move a project forward that the WMD was unable to do in
Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority
Regular Meeting Minutes - Thursday, September 27, 2012
3
MPRWA Minutes Thursday, September 27, 2012
the past. There may come a time we won't have both organizations serving, but this is not the
time.
Having no fruther comments to speak, he closed public comments.
bachofner, not may havea time it will dispand, but WILL have a time it will disband.
Edelen - just because we have water in our name does not mean we have authority to oversea
or change all things water, jsut finding more water. Can't bring extraneious items that are not
related to the mission into this meeting and that can take place after ward.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mr. Potter Abstains
Motion to Approve MINUTES for August 1, 2012 and September 12, 2012
AYES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 DIRECTORS: None
RECUSED: 0 DIRECTORS: None
3. August 1, 2012
4. September 12, 2012 Special Meeting
AGENDA ITEMS
5. Direct the Selection of Legal Counsel and Authorize the President to Execute a Professional
Services Contract with the Selected Firm/Attorney
Legal Council Davi presented the report. Previously requested the City of Monterey to release
an RFQ for legal council, August 10th it was received and 21 proposals were recieved. Ad Hoc
reviewed and reccomends the following 4 firms. 1) 2) 3) 4) . All were qualified and recomended
based on specific criteria. These be put before the firm, for discussion and selection in open
session. Staff answered questions of the board.
Bachofner stated that one firm resids in Santa Cruz and the costs and timliness and the likely
savings on travel time would be benficial to limit and fram the discussion down to 3 firms. $600
Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority
Regular Meeting Minutes - Thursday, September 27, 2012
4
MPRWA Minutes Thursday, September 27, 2012
a month per month
Burnett: how many of the firms would be willing to accept a retainer. Davi responded as 1.
Potter- none of the associate fees were included except for one. Work can always be done by
associates. No specifics, only assumptions can be made.
Della sala opened the item for public comments: Anthony Candovy, principal attorney at _____
& Kevonovich. Did put a reduced rate in their. principally been a practice not to charge for travel
but since it is a further time.
Don Freeman: Spoke in support of his submission and gave qualifications for his consideration
of his firm.
Jason Redder: Partner at L& G, submitted proposal, very well qualified for competent legal
services. Question of partners vs associates. Each partner has 10 to 15 years. Rates are
reflective of experience.
Richard Glenn: Thompson Law office, it's the closest and uses no milage to get here. Did not
recognize socliation for a fixed fee. Bundlin services is very doable. Paralegal rate at $110, very
flexible to provide type of services a lawyer can get caught up in, which can save costs.
Substantial experience in public agency work, and water supply issues.
Having no further questions to speak on item 5, closed public comment on this item.
Pendergrass: What we really need is someone that can get on the ship that has already been
there, knows us, knows penninsula issues, knows the players. Reccomend Don Freeman's
firm. Does not sees a bias in what he does. Needs someone that can jump on running and not
have to get up to speed. Strongly reccomend Don Freeman and his office. Likes retainers
instead of hourly rates.
Edlenen: 4 firms represented were all well qualified, the fact that all four firms showed up was
very professional. Agreed with Pendergrass due to the sucessful relationship and work that Don
Freeman has provided, he would like to go with experience factor.
Burnett moved to accpet firm of Don Freeman and the option of a retainer of $2500,
Pendergrass seconds. There is a lot of history and it's not that the other firms can't get up to
speed but don has been doing a good service at this time.
bachofner spoke to the motion: Interested in hering fmore fromthe Thompson lawfirm, regarding
the fixed cost rates as well. Decision is to the greatest degree possible go with the most local ,
has a net positive impact on the penninsula. Not be averse to coming back to a next meeting to
get a presentation from the Thompson law firm.
Garcia: Points out specifics of Don Freeman's proposal. Staff Davi spoke to her concern that
the retainer rate would not be used up if extra services were billed at a higer rate. the $2500 flat
rate would not be affected. Only used during litigation. Option for review after 90 days.
Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority
Regular Meeting Minutes - Thursday, September 27, 2012
5
MPRWA Minutes Thursday, September 27, 2012
Don Freeman came back in to discuss the fee schedule presented in the proposal. Rarely
charge the extrordainary fees, unless must attend ligigation.
Bachofner: How many hours were you spending on a monthly basis? REsponse: well more
than 10 hours. Clarified the 90 day review peiord to be fair to both the board and personally.
Potter - he expressed concerned that Mr. Freeman serves at the pleasure of too many of the
local jurisdictions and there would be a concern with an element of influence. This should be
subject to consideration of the board. If the issue of conflict came up it would most likely be at a
critical time and ti would be unreasonable to have to continuously retain outside council in times
of conflict.
Freeman: Does represent other JPAs but he would be required to bring a letter to each of the
jurisdictions for which he participates to deal with any conflicts of interest. If there was a conflict,
he is conservative, and he would suggest to the Board retaining seperate legal council.
Bachofner: Concerned about conflict of interest as well. Rich Glenn worked for th City of
Seaside previously land the Thompson law firm would be a good selection, there is no conflict
of interest and he has extensive public agency experience
Garcia: Has had great experiences with Mr. Freeman and hsa been very professional and does
not forsee that there would be a conflict of interest.
Motion: To select Perry and freeman, the motion is the alternative fee of $2500 - All in favor -
Passed unanimously.
"Accept don freemans propsal of a fixed month contract of $2500 with teh undertsanding of the
addiotnoal costs would bge above and beyond and there would be a 90 da yreview period. "
Davi will review the contract
Freeman would submit all costs for review and approval seperatly.
Motion to Approve Direct the Selection of Legal Counsel and Authorize the President to
Execute a Professional Services Contract with the Selected Firm/Attorney Don Freeman
AYES: 6 DIRECTORS: Bachofner, Burnett, Edelen, Garcia, Pendergrass,
Della Sala
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 DIRECTORS: None
RECUSED: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Motion to Approve Direct the Selection of Legal Counsel and Authorize the President to
Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority
Regular Meeting Minutes - Thursday, September 27, 2012
6
MPRWA Minutes Thursday, September 27, 2012
Execute a Professional Services Contract with the Selected Firm/Attorney Don Freeman
AYES: 6 DIRECTORS: Bachofner, Burnett, Edelen, Garcia, Pendergrass,
Della Sala
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 DIRECTORS: None
RECUSED: 0 DIRECTORS: None
6. Review the Necessity/Desirability of Executive Director
City Manager Meurer presented the report on this item.
President Della Sala opened public comment on this item.
Tom Rowley: Very lucky to have him involved, teh workshops. The sooner the ED is appointed,
the more efficient the Agency can function. Della Sala Closed public comment.
Bachofner - reccomends to adjourn to closed session and supports the hiring of an ED.
Garcia: Agrees with Meurer that CMs are challenged to compelte their jobs with the limited
resources, and thinks this is the right path to go down sooner or later.
Burnett: Does not disagree with the need, but focus shoudl be getting the right person. Does
not want to be forced into an arrangement that is not ideal.
Concensus to move forward with an executive director. Is a motion necessary? Freemean:
Appropriate.
Garcia Makes motion, Burnet to indicate that the authrit board will hire an exeutive
director.
Motion to Approve Review the Necessity/Desirability of Executive Director
AYES: 6 DIRECTORS: Bachofner, Burnett, Edelen, Garcia, Pendergrass,
Della Sala
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 DIRECTORS: None
RECUSED: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority
Regular Meeting Minutes - Thursday, September 27, 2012
7
MPRWA Minutes Thursday, September 27, 2012
7. Discuss Agenda Items for Future Meetings
President Della Sala introduced this item requesting additional agenda topics for future
meetings. Director Burnett requested that a discussion over the surcharge take place in the
future due to the fact the issue may come before the Board prior to the completion of the SPI
Consulting report. Having no further requests to speak from the board, President Della Sala
brought it out to the public. Having no requests to speak, he closed public comment on the
item.
8. Information
President Della Sala introduced the item and indicated that there are previous commitments in
the Council Chamber at 6:00 p.m. through the end of 2012 and we can renegotiate the 6:00
hour for the 2013 meetings.
President Della Sala adjorned the meeting to Closed Session at 7:38 p.m.
***Adjourn to Closed Session***
ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CLOSED SESSION
Legal Council Don Freeman announced that the Board gave confidential direction to staff.
ADJOURNMENT
ATTEST:
Lesley Milton, Clerk to the Board, Authority Clerk MPRWA President
Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority
Regular Meeting Minutes - Thursday, September 27, 2012
8
Agenda
Agenda
Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority (MPRWA)
Regular Meeting
6:00 PM, Thursday, September 27, 2012
Few Memorial Hall, City Council Chamber
580 Pacific Street
Monterey, California
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
OTHER BUSINESS
1. Accept Monterey County as Participatory Member of the Monterey Peninsula Regional
Water Authority and Authorize Amendment to Bylaws - <Davi>
REPORTS FROM BOARD DIRECTORS AND STAFF
2. Receive Report from Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) - <Stoldt>
a. Summary of September 17, 2012 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
b. Review of Consultant Schedule and Progress
PUBLIC COMMENTS
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
3. August 1, 2012
4. September 12, 2012 Special Meeting
AGENDA ITEMS
5. Direct the Selection of Legal Counsel and Authorize the President to Execute a
Professional Services Contract with the Selected Firm/Attorney – <Davi>
6. Review the Necessity/Desirability of Executive Director – <Meurer>
7. Discuss Agenda Items for Future Meetings - <Della Sala>
8. Information - <Della Sala>
***Adjourn to Closed Session (See additional agenda)***
ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CLOSED SESSION
ADJOURNMENT
Thursday, September 27, 2012
The Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority is committed to include the disabled in all of
its services, programs and activities. For disabled access, dial 711 to use the California Relay
Service (CRS) to speak to staff at the Monterey City Clerk’s Office, the Principal Office of the
Authority. CRS offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services
24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a
meeting, dial 711 to use CRS to talk to staff at the Monterey City Clerk’s Office at
(831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device or for information on an agenda.
Agenda related writings or documents provided to the MPRWA are available for public
inspection during the meeting or may be requested from the Monterey City Clerk’s Office at 580
Pacific St, Room 6, Monterey, CA 93940. This agenda is posted in compliance with California
Government Code Section 54954.2(a) or Section 54956.
2
Get email alerts for Monterey
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.