Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority
Regular MeetingMonterey, CA · December 13, 2012
Minutes
MINUTES
MONTEREY PENINSULA REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY (MPRWA)
Regular Meeting
7:00 PM, Thursday, December 13, 2012
COUNCIL CHAMBER
FEW MEMORIAL HALL OF RECORDS
MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
Directors Present: Pendergrass, Rubio, Carmel Alternate Talmage, Della Sala
Directors Absent: Kampe, Edelen
Staff Present: Interim Executive Director, Legal Counsel, Clerk of the Authority
ROLL CALL
President Della Sala called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. indicating Director Edelen is
absent due to a prior City commitment and Mr. Kampe is expected to arrive late. Director
Burnett is represented by Alternate Director Ken Talmage.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
REPORTS FROM BOARD DIRECTORS AND STAFF
President Della Sala invited reports from Directors. Director Pendergrass reported on the major
outcomes of the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (MPWMD) meeting on
December 10, 2012 to discuss and approve going forward with a secondary or back up
desalination facility program. The MPWMD Council was unanimous supporting the motion to
have an alternate project in the event the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project (MPWSP)
project is not completed prior to the 2017 deadline, and to release a Request for Qualifications
(RFQ).
1. Update from Ad Hoc Committee on Governance and Financing Regarding Discussions with
California American Water
Action: Received Update
Carmel Alternate Director Ken Talmage gave an update on the California Public Utilities
Commission Desalination cost workshop he and Director Burnett attended December 11, 12 &
13, 2012. He also reported a separate meeting took place December 11, 2012 with MPRWA
and Cal Am representatives to discuss the capital costs of the proposed Cal Am desalination
facility and the potential to substitute public funds for Cal Am’s equity. Cal Am representatives
requested a written proposal from the MPRWA before they would consider alternatives. Cal Am
also suggested the Water Management District prepare multiple strategies to support viable
public funding options.
President Della Sala acknowledged that this was only an update but for the sake of
transparency and input, opened the item for public comment. Doug Wilhelm spoke against Cal
Am’s $99 million surcharge, the risks associated with project failure and potential stranded
costs. Mr. Wilhelm also spoke to Director Pendergrass’ update regarding the Water
Management District’s meeting last week and encouraged information sharing as not to
duplicate efforts. Nelson Vega encouraged the Authority to look at establishment of a water
purchase agreement which would allow the Authority to sell the water to Cal Am and let Cal Am
facilitate the desalination of the water. Having no further requests to speak President Della Sala
closed public comment and moved on to the next agenda item.
MPRWA Minutes Thursday, December 13, 2012
Interim Director Meurer responded to the comments about the budget regarding future
anticipated costs. The Authority agreed to agendize a budget update and possible request for
additional funding at a future Authority meeting.
2. Update from California Public Utilities Commission Cost Workshop and Pre-Hearing
Conference
Action: Received Report
Alt Director Talmage presented a report on the outcomes of the CPUC Cost workshop and
noted changes to previously released information from Cal Am and indicated the below areas of
concern that should be addressed in the future.
The size of the proposed facility: The proposal has no allocation for general plan
buildout. The plant should be sized to meet maximum monthly demand and pipes must
be sized to meet peak pipe demand.
Cal Am estimated water need was based on usage factors gathered in the last 5 years,
which will not be representative of true need due to extraneous factors that have
occurred in that time frame.
The completion schedule has slipped to October 2017 and this timeline does not include
any flexibility for potential litigation.
The operating budget had the cost of power as more than 50% of total operating budget
which calls into question the power cost estimates in the SPI Consultant’s report.
Mr. Talmage additionally reported about the cost of project delay indicating for every 1%
inflation the project will increase by $1.85 million for every six months for a total amount of 11
million dollars. He also noted Cal Am purchased 46 acres on Benson Road for a desalination
facility, straight east from cement plant in City of Marina, adjacent to waste water plant, at 100
foot level past the 500 year flood plain.
Mr. Talmage lastly reported that the Cal Am identified their financial model needs adjustments
and wdill introduce two new model sizes and revise demand numbers around January 1,
2012He suggested the TAC discuss this model at their January 7, 2012 meeting.
Pacific Grove City Manager Frutchey presented information about the third day of the workshop
agreeing with all points made by Mr. Talmage and added emphasis that Cal Am’s savings
estimates are due to the current economic situation which are very questionable assumptions
and are unreliable. He also noted that with respect to schedule slippage, Cal Am did not
indicate the cause was based on delay of test well or permitting, which generates more
questions about further potential slippage.
Russ McLaughlin communicated that Judge Weatherford and Andrew Barnsdale agreed to
major alternatives will be considered to be analyzed at the same level and depth as the initial
proposal and Cal Am acknowledge that their original proposal had serious risks. Judge
Weatherford communicated six major issues that need resolution before he will make a
decision:
1. Any changes in the project description of the applicant which causes problems for
environmental analysis and political discussions. Three Changes: site acquisition,
screening levels of the wells, and timeline
2. Suggested to shift the cost recovery issues to a separate phase of the project.
3. Status of the public agency participation proposals.
4. Environmental Review – NEPA/CEQA process
5. Protocols and procedures for the hearing: pushed for submission of joint testimony as
Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority
Regular Meeting Minutes - Thursday, December 13, 2012
2
MPRWA Minutes Thursday, December 13, 2012
unanimity was seen as important and helpful for achieving a decision.
6. Two motions have been filed: 1) Size of the plant based on the groundwater recharge –
the motion requested plant sizing be based solely on objective criteria. 2) Argued that
public input is also important and Cal Am needs to do a better job of providing a
quarterly report to the public on project status and being up front with the community.
George Riley spoke to Mr. Talmage remarks and added that he was pleased Cal Am was very
forthright with data and commended them for their openness. He was concerned that Cal Am
did not identify potential hazards, making many assumptions without addressing potential
permitting or legal issues.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
President Della Sala invited public comments for items not on the agenda and with no requests
to speak closed public comment.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
3. June 14, 2012
Action: Approved as Amended
On a motion by Director Pendergrass, seconded by Alternate Director Talmage, and carried by
the following vote, the Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority approved the minutes of
June 14, 2012 as amended.
AYES: 3 DIRECTORS: Pendergrass, Talmage, Della Sala
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 2 DIRECTORS: Edelen, Kampe
ABSTAIN: 1 DIRECTORS: Rubio
RECUSED: 0 DIRECTORS: None
4. Approval of Appointments to the Technical Advisory Committee
Action: Approved Addition of Three New TAC Members
President Della Sala introduced the item requesting the Authority appoint three individuals as
members of the TAC. Alternate Director Talmage provided a verbal synopsis of each of the
three recommended candidates. President Della Sala opened the item for questions from the
Board. Director Pendergrass questioned the appointment of Mr. Bill Reichmuth while
contending for the Executive Director position and staff indicated there was no conflict. Director
Pendergrass also spoke in support of the appointment of Dale Haus indicating he might be able
to be a key negotiator to the Salinas Valley Growers region. President Della Sala opened the
item to public comment and having no requests to speak, closed public comment on the item.
On a motion by President Della Sala, seconded by Director Rubio and carried by the following
vote, the Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority approved the Appointments to the
Technical Advisory Committee of Dale Haus, Bill Reichmuth and Robert Siegfried:
AYES: 4 DIRECTORS: Rubio, Pendergrass, Talmage, Della Sala
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 2 DIRECTORS: Edelen, Kampe
ABSTAIN: 0 DIRECTORS: None
RECUSED: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority
Regular Meeting Minutes - Thursday, December 13, 2012
3
MPRWA Minutes Thursday, December 13, 2012
5. Legal Counsel Discussion of Brown Act, Closed Session Conduct and Noticing Requirements
for Public Agencies
Action: Received Presentation and Discussed
Legal Counsel Freeman presented the report explaining the purpose of the Ralph M. Brown Act
is to ensure that public agency actions are transparent and responsive to the public, ensuring
members do not make decisions outside of a public meeting. Closed session meetings have
specific exceptions which are limited to specific categories, but likely outside of the scope of the
MPRWA. Mr. Freeman discussed agenda noticing requirements and noted that in June of this
year, the state of California waived the requirements of the Brown Act noticing, but
acknowledged the MPRWA will still continue to comply with public noticing requirements as it is
in the best interest of the public trust. President Della Sala opened the meeting to public
comments.
Pacific Grove resident Donald Murphy echoed working in the trust of the public and applauded
the effort of the Authority. State law does allow closed session meetings but requested the
Authority always consider the necessity of having closed sessions, and only schedule if the
public could benefit from the results. Having no further requests to speak, President Della Sala
closed public comment and proceeded to the next agenda item.
6. Discuss Outreach Strategy for Engaging the Public on the Role of the Water Authority and
Provide Direction
Action: Discussed and Continued to Future Meeting
President Della Sala requested an update for video services for future Authority meetings.
Interim Director Meurer reported he will request Monterey City Council fund the staff time to
televise future Authority meetings. Director Pendergrass encouraged more interaction with the
local media, specifically written publications to vocalize the Authority’s position with accurate
information. Alternate Director Talmage requested continuing the item until a future meeting
when all Directors are present. President Della Sala opened the item for public comment and
having no requests to speak closed public comment and continued the item to an unspecified
future meeting date.
7. Approval of MPRWA Meeting Dates for 2013
Action: Approved Scenario A
Clerk to the Authority presented an update on future potential meetings for the Authority noting
that the regularly scheduled meeting dates of the second and fourth Thursday of the month has
potential facility conflicts. The Authority directors were presented with two scenarios of future
meeting dates. President Della Sala opened the item for public comments and Pacific Grove City
Manager Tom Frutchey offered the City of Pacific Grove facilities to host the Authority meetings
on the alternate dates. With no future requests to speak President Della Sala closed public
Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority
Regular Meeting Minutes - Thursday, December 13, 2012
4
MPRWA Minutes Thursday, December 13, 2012
comment.
On a motion by Director Rubio, seconded by Director Pendergrass and carried by the following
vote, the Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority approved future meeting dates as
presented in scenario A through March 31st, 2012:
AYES: 4 DIRECTORS: Rubio, Pendergrass, Talmage, Della Sala
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 2 DIRECTORS: Edelen, Kampe
ABSTAIN: 0 DIRECTORS: None
RECUSED: 0 DIRECTORS: None
8. Adopt Resolution Approving Legal Services Contract to the Firm of Perry and Freeman
Action: Approved Contract and Adopted Resolution No. 2012-07
Legal Counsel Freeman introduced the item indicating consistency with the Request for
Qualification the Authority released for legal services. He noted the contract included a previously
approved 90 day review period and the contract would be fully executed as of December 15,
2012. President Della Sala opened the item for public comment and having no requests to speak,
closed public comments and brought discussion back to the board.
On a motion by Alternate Director Talmage, seconded by Director Pendergrass and carried by
the following vote, the Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority approved the legal
services contract for The Firm of Perry and Freeman as presented and adopted resolution
number 2012-07.
AYES: 4 DIRECTORS: Rubio, Pendergrass, Talmage, Della Sala
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 2 DIRECTORS: Edelen, Kampe
ABSTAIN: 0 DIRECTORS: None
RECUSED: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to come before the Authority, President Della Sala adjourned the
meeting at 8:23 p.m.
ATTEST:
Lesley Milton, Clerk of the Authority MPRWA President
Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority
Regular Meeting Minutes - Thursday, December 13, 2012
5
Agenda
Agenda
Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority (MPRWA)
Regular Meeting
7:00 PM, Thursday, December 13, 2012
Council Chamber
Few Memorial Hall of Records
Monterey, California
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
REPORTS FROM BOARD DIRECTORS AND STAFF
1. Update from Ad Hoc Committee on Governance and Financing Regarding Discussions
with California American Water
2. Update from California Public Utilities Commission Cost Workshop and Pre-Hearing
Conference
PUBLIC COMMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS allows you, the public, to speak for a maximum of three minutes on any
subject which is within the jurisdiction of the MPRWA and which is not on the agenda. Any person
or group desiring to bring an item to the attention of the Authority may do so by addressing the
Authority during Public Comments or by addressing a letter of explanation to: MPRWA, Attn:
Monterey City Clerk, 580 Pacific St, Monterey, CA 93940. The appropriate staff person will contact
the sender concerning the details.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
3. June 14, 2012
AGENDA ITEMS
4. Approval of Appointments to the Technical Advisory Committee
5. Legal Counsel Discussion of Brown Act, Closed Session Conduct and Noticing
Requirements for Public Agencies
6. Discuss Outreach Strategy for Engaging the Public on the Role of the Water Authority and
Provide Direction
7. Approval of MPRWA Meeting Dates for 2013
8. Adopt Resolution Approving Legal Services Contract to the Firm of Perry and Freeman
ADJOURNMENT
Thursday, December 13, 2012
The Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority is committed to include the disabled in all of
its services, programs and activities. For disabled access, dial 711 to use the California Relay
Service (CRS) to speak to staff at the Monterey City Clerk’s Office, the Principal Office of the
Authority. CRS offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services
24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a
meeting, dial 711 to use CRS to talk to staff at the Monterey City Clerk’s Office at
(831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device or for information on an agenda.
Agenda related writings or documents provided to the MPRWA are available for public
inspection during the meeting or may be requested from the Monterey City Clerk’s Office at 580
Pacific St, Room 6, Monterey, CA 93940. This agenda is posted in compliance with California
Government Code Section 54954.2(a) or Section 54956.
2
Get email alerts for Monterey
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.